I dont see why this wouldnt be an interpersonal act, because you transmit something and i'm retrieving it. You're totally right and i totally agree with what you're saying.
hey so didn't u pretty much answer your own question? The 'delay' as u say in the potential recipient receiving and then responding to you doesn't really matter considering that would happen anyway. In that sense it is just a matter of relative time. Having said that, if your video went unseen and unheard it could not generate a reaction. However, only when it is (not only) seen and then responded to can it be an interpersonal interaction.
Also, if it was ONLY seen and not responded to, keeping in mind that this here site is the only mediator then it cannot be counted as an interaction because you wouldn't have known who ignored it or if someone did for that matter.
@WickedWolverine and he's also talking about physical reaction so you cant fool me theres anybody who didnt even react a little to this video, in a physical way.
So even if you wouldnt comment on this video, you are giving a reaction, in a physical way.
Yes, I believe so - as long as I understand the concept. But the question now is whether watching and not commenting can be considered interpersonal behaviour as well.
The internet can be a very good way to express yourself via any number of forums. It can indeed bring about stimulating discussions you may have never had otherwise. I value this, but I think it is also extremely important to monitor your interpersonal habits and never let slide the most valuable form of interaction of all-- face to face conversation and discussion. Actual reasoned discussion and debate is sadly becoming somewhat of a dying art and that is the sizable downside of internet mania!
The things you have to say bring me to a different level. You are very profound and I honestly don't think you need to worry about your speaking skills, you are absolutely marvelous with your words.
Micah excellent topic video it's funny in a way how we all go about our lives and probably ignore each other directly we pride ourselves in our relationships with family and friends, classmates or co workers but we seem too have little responce to so many when we randomly pass others throughout our daily life. we all hate being alone funny thing is there are so many people that none of us are truly ever alone. Yet so many feel so alone. hmm.
Similarly, a tree records passing time & seasons with its growth, the individual who observes the tree, experiences the tree quite personally. Light departs from a star 250,000 light years away, the waveform of light, in reality, takes all paths before it coalesces into the photon that hits our retina’s rhodopsin. The experience of the particle of light is personal and would not have been possible without that light waveform taking all possible paths from its source. I think this is so cool!
If you were a writer and wrote a book, and people chose to read your book, even though the book was written in the readers' absence, and the book may or may not have been written for the expressed purpose of being read, nevertheless the act of writing is with intention to record. Reading is an interpersonal experience. So much of what we learn is by reading!
i would argue that this is truly an interpersonal interaction since a) you are interacting with a potential audience and have chosen to express yourself in the way that you have for this yet unrealised audience and b) we as you say are going to react to your delayed ineraction with us who are now your realised audience and c) this comment would be a concrete example of the same
The interpersonal relationship is always available to an open mind. You are sending your vibrations by using this form of technology. Your willingness to communicate is taking you onto the path less traveled. Recognize those who walk the talk and you will never be alone.
yep. it's all interpersonal. your animations, your music, your words, and even the random videos you post with your friends. The world is full of networks. But, who is to say that interpersonal always result conscious behaviors??? These networks you post your video's and tunes on... they operate in mysterious ways. I wish the people who ran them had a heart and soul more like you Micah. But, unfortunately i believe there is negative shit floating out there waiting to peel whats good.
- Interpersonal, yes. 103 times now. Delay is no problem. "Problem" is the degree of blind- or unawareness of the reaction from your part. Now from mine.
- The paparazzi's work (unlike the sniper's) stays not-interpersonal until his picture is published and viewed by the pictured. It takes two to tango.
- If i programmed a computer to view you uploads and click like or dislike depending on the appearance of a piano it would be interpersonal even if i meanwhile died?
@nje03 thanks for the response. i think the most interpersonal part of this video is the recieving comments and responding to them. in fact, i would say that is the only interpersonal part of youtube. but comments would not be possible without a video, so it is the video that prompts interpersonal actions. i think the video alone is not interpersonal.
I enjoyed the interpersonal act,it still felt the same even with the delay.Like getting a postcard from someone on holiday :) just a few words scribbled on a card do the trick.
Very interesting stuff, Micah. I think that where signs work there's interpersonal relation. I also belive that we all have an interpersonal relations with ourselves, cause even if we are one person we are made of different signs. In the sense that what I am is in relation with what I am not...
...I mean I'm now what I've been before and what I wanna be in the future. I think this is a problem of presence and absence, but the presence has been built by absence and absence must be brought to presence to BE absent. I think delay is essential: the moment of difference and identity. :-)
@fasterthanbolt i enjoyed reading your responses. thanks so much for the input. an act is personified once it's message is recieved. in order for an interpersonal act to occur, the recipient of the information must be stimulated in some way. if the recipient recieves no sensory stimulation by the act, then the act is not interpersonal even though an interpersonal action was preformed.
an example of this would be if a person was watching the news, became angry at a politician, and began yelling at the person on the screen. even though words and facial expressions have been conducted by the viewer, the politician on television has no access to this information; however, the mind of the viewer responds to the politicians electronically guided stimulus as if he is directly involved with the conversation.
Well, thanks to you for the input, Micah :-) I think you have good intentions and are able to stimulate people in a good way, with pathos. I see here everybody likes your attitude and curiosity, I think. So, I hope you'll keep interacting with us through your videos. Don't stop being uncertain, or keep being certain of being uncertain. Don't know if my italian thoughts are correctly translated and make sense. Sometimes I don't understand them in my own language. :-)
Dearest Micah the Searcher - Everyone can make their own choices.
Although my sense perception of your ponderous questions is digital and electronic AND after the fact; the past is never lost! Anyone, by some grace of God and the gift of being human, can truly be affected by someone else's intention, enthusiasm, and thoughts. The past is never GONE: it's just harder to find. One needs 'loving interest.
that is so true! communicating blows my mind. people encounter each other (or talk over the phone or through the internet) and then, by some magic, thoughts are sent and recieved. it's hard to know if the intended message gets across, and probably 99% of the time the original thought itself is distorted in some way due to the limitations of langauge, and yet social life goes on and things are accomplished.
your last sentence made reminded me of "inception". have you seen it?
He he, yes I agree: it is independet from time and space, except for the time and the space required to say that it is independent. I mean the time and the space needed to give it its essence of independence.
you cant ever know what people are thinking completely
even with speech
Groblinfull 2 months ago
I think this is pretty deep and I'm not even stoned, well done.
will79randomstuff 4 months ago
either im too stupid to understand wtf ur tryin to say or im too fried..
smicklefritz 4 months ago
you are on the right track. the "delay" is effected by the future.
ntrval 4 months ago
You smell like sex ;D
vintagetoast14 4 months ago 2
I dont see why this wouldnt be an interpersonal act, because you transmit something and i'm retrieving it. You're totally right and i totally agree with what you're saying.
skaterocker666 5 months ago
i think most people smell more people than they touch.. depending on how good your ability to smell is
jacketnipple 5 months ago
hey so didn't u pretty much answer your own question? The 'delay' as u say in the potential recipient receiving and then responding to you doesn't really matter considering that would happen anyway. In that sense it is just a matter of relative time. Having said that, if your video went unseen and unheard it could not generate a reaction. However, only when it is (not only) seen and then responded to can it be an interpersonal interaction.
WickedWolverine 6 months ago
Also, if it was ONLY seen and not responded to, keeping in mind that this here site is the only mediator then it cannot be counted as an interaction because you wouldn't have known who ignored it or if someone did for that matter.
WickedWolverine 6 months ago
@WickedWolverine but you're responding to it so its an interaction. Otherwise it wouldn't be, i agree on that.
skaterocker666 5 months ago
@WickedWolverine and he's also talking about physical reaction so you cant fool me theres anybody who didnt even react a little to this video, in a physical way.
So even if you wouldnt comment on this video, you are giving a reaction, in a physical way.
skaterocker666 5 months ago
@skaterocker666 well that is basically what I'm saying, it would then just be a reaction. good point on the physical reaction part!
WickedWolverine 5 months ago
Yes, I believe so - as long as I understand the concept. But the question now is whether watching and not commenting can be considered interpersonal behaviour as well.
StevenKellyBelly 6 months ago
Comment removed
HesDaryl 8 months ago
The internet can be a very good way to express yourself via any number of forums. It can indeed bring about stimulating discussions you may have never had otherwise. I value this, but I think it is also extremely important to monitor your interpersonal habits and never let slide the most valuable form of interaction of all-- face to face conversation and discussion. Actual reasoned discussion and debate is sadly becoming somewhat of a dying art and that is the sizable downside of internet mania!
PhilErup2000000 9 months ago
The things you have to say bring me to a different level. You are very profound and I honestly don't think you need to worry about your speaking skills, you are absolutely marvelous with your words.
HerroStrawBowie 10 months ago 4
@HerroStrawBowie hey thanks alot. i feel pretty ridiculous in front of camera, so thanks for the encouragement!
MicahBuzan 10 months ago
Micah excellent topic video it's funny in a way how we all go about our lives and probably ignore each other directly we pride ourselves in our relationships with family and friends, classmates or co workers but we seem too have little responce to so many when we randomly pass others throughout our daily life. we all hate being alone funny thing is there are so many people that none of us are truly ever alone. Yet so many feel so alone. hmm.
Igenerally 1 year ago
Similarly, a tree records passing time & seasons with its growth, the individual who observes the tree, experiences the tree quite personally. Light departs from a star 250,000 light years away, the waveform of light, in reality, takes all paths before it coalesces into the photon that hits our retina’s rhodopsin. The experience of the particle of light is personal and would not have been possible without that light waveform taking all possible paths from its source. I think this is so cool!
ohwhererehwho 1 year ago
If you were a writer and wrote a book, and people chose to read your book, even though the book was written in the readers' absence, and the book may or may not have been written for the expressed purpose of being read, nevertheless the act of writing is with intention to record. Reading is an interpersonal experience. So much of what we learn is by reading!
ohwhererehwho 1 year ago
i would argue that this is truly an interpersonal interaction since a) you are interacting with a potential audience and have chosen to express yourself in the way that you have for this yet unrealised audience and b) we as you say are going to react to your delayed ineraction with us who are now your realised audience and c) this comment would be a concrete example of the same
bangaway 1 year ago
The interpersonal relationship is always available to an open mind. You are sending your vibrations by using this form of technology. Your willingness to communicate is taking you onto the path less traveled. Recognize those who walk the talk and you will never be alone.
ThisBoyTV 1 year ago
yep. it's all interpersonal. your animations, your music, your words, and even the random videos you post with your friends. The world is full of networks. But, who is to say that interpersonal always result conscious behaviors??? These networks you post your video's and tunes on... they operate in mysterious ways. I wish the people who ran them had a heart and soul more like you Micah. But, unfortunately i believe there is negative shit floating out there waiting to peel whats good.
badblues102 1 year ago
- Interpersonal, yes. 103 times now. Delay is no problem. "Problem" is the degree of blind- or unawareness of the reaction from your part. Now from mine.
- The paparazzi's work (unlike the sniper's) stays not-interpersonal until his picture is published and viewed by the pictured. It takes two to tango.
- If i programmed a computer to view you uploads and click like or dislike depending on the appearance of a piano it would be interpersonal even if i meanwhile died?
InuitAldebaran 1 year ago
hey there, pre-werewolf jacob black!
AsSimpleAsThat 1 year ago
@nje03 thanks for the response. i think the most interpersonal part of this video is the recieving comments and responding to them. in fact, i would say that is the only interpersonal part of youtube. but comments would not be possible without a video, so it is the video that prompts interpersonal actions. i think the video alone is not interpersonal.
MicahBuzan 1 year ago
This is a brilliant thought, you are very philosophical.
Rutle 1 year ago
*head explodes*
myblisslikethis 1 year ago
I enjoyed the interpersonal act,it still felt the same even with the delay.Like getting a postcard from someone on holiday :) just a few words scribbled on a card do the trick.
spiralisedcat 1 year ago
Very interesting stuff, Micah. I think that where signs work there's interpersonal relation. I also belive that we all have an interpersonal relations with ourselves, cause even if we are one person we are made of different signs. In the sense that what I am is in relation with what I am not...
fasterthanbolt 1 year ago
...I mean I'm now what I've been before and what I wanna be in the future. I think this is a problem of presence and absence, but the presence has been built by absence and absence must be brought to presence to BE absent. I think delay is essential: the moment of difference and identity. :-)
fasterthanbolt 1 year ago
@fasterthanbolt i enjoyed reading your responses. thanks so much for the input. an act is personified once it's message is recieved. in order for an interpersonal act to occur, the recipient of the information must be stimulated in some way. if the recipient recieves no sensory stimulation by the act, then the act is not interpersonal even though an interpersonal action was preformed.
MicahBuzan 1 year ago
an example of this would be if a person was watching the news, became angry at a politician, and began yelling at the person on the screen. even though words and facial expressions have been conducted by the viewer, the politician on television has no access to this information; however, the mind of the viewer responds to the politicians electronically guided stimulus as if he is directly involved with the conversation.
MicahBuzan 1 year ago
@MicahBuzan
Well, thanks to you for the input, Micah :-) I think you have good intentions and are able to stimulate people in a good way, with pathos. I see here everybody likes your attitude and curiosity, I think. So, I hope you'll keep interacting with us through your videos. Don't stop being uncertain, or keep being certain of being uncertain. Don't know if my italian thoughts are correctly translated and make sense. Sometimes I don't understand them in my own language. :-)
fasterthanbolt 1 year ago
I love your thought provoking vlogs! Wheres the 16x9 upload?
DesolateMinds 1 year ago
@DesolateMinds thanks, i'm going to try and do more v logs even though i'm bad at speaking.
my computer has been mega-slow lately so i couldn't upload a higher quality vid.
MicahBuzan 1 year ago
Dearest Micah the Searcher - Everyone can make their own choices.
Although my sense perception of your ponderous questions is digital and electronic AND after the fact; the past is never lost! Anyone, by some grace of God and the gift of being human, can truly be affected by someone else's intention, enthusiasm, and thoughts. The past is never GONE: it's just harder to find. One needs 'loving interest.
therarub 1 year ago
For every action there is an infinite reaction.
We exist in infinite agreed realities of cause and effect.
Singularity is a state of complete awareness.
Ponder this: when you see a person during dream awareness, do they react independently of you? Where now is your view of 'reality'?
smileykai77 1 year ago
that is so true! communicating blows my mind. people encounter each other (or talk over the phone or through the internet) and then, by some magic, thoughts are sent and recieved. it's hard to know if the intended message gets across, and probably 99% of the time the original thought itself is distorted in some way due to the limitations of langauge, and yet social life goes on and things are accomplished.
your last sentence made reminded me of "inception". have you seen it?
MicahBuzan 1 year ago
@MicahBuzan I have unplugged from the mainstream media but will watch or listen if recommended.
Consciousness is independent of time and space.
smileykai77 1 year ago
@smileykai77
He he, yes I agree: it is independet from time and space, except for the time and the space required to say that it is independent. I mean the time and the space needed to give it its essence of independence.
fasterthanbolt 1 year ago
Yes it is interpersonal because I just clicked on the thumbs up.
batfly 1 year ago
@batfly good point, very clever ;)
MicahBuzan 1 year ago
You're sweet. :)
Xpsychedelic60sX 1 year ago
I think in the science world this is known as an interpersonal YouTubieal act : )
Rocket
Ottawarocket 1 year ago
@Ottawarocket the science world comes up with some pretty radical names :)
MicahBuzan 1 year ago
interesting topic.
stopjoshing 1 year ago
I like. : )
MidwinterSon 1 year ago