Social constructionists sometimes walk on thin ice when they critique natural science. There are often social biases that go into scientific theories, but atoms still exist and organisms have phylogenetic relationships with each other independent of our interpretations of them. I would expect a rational social constructionist to be able to make that distinction. Do you agree?
Social constructionists sometimes walk on thin ice when they critique natural science. There are often social biases that go into scientific theories, but atoms still exist and organisms have phylogenetic relationships with each other independent of our interpretations of them. I would expect a rational social constructionist to be able to make that distinction. Do you agree?
prschuster 1 month ago