Chicken is a long related cousin to dinosaurs, they are evolved dinosaurs, much like us humans are evolved monkeys, so the chicken, infact, came first
i think the chiken was genetically created to serve nutrition neeeds of maybe pre man im not sure all i no is we aint clevver these days who knows what happened thousands oy years ago all we have is books like the bible so we are so blind
I agree (to some level) with Blazflare.. if you really want to solve such a thing, look at its history.. I believe eventually you come to the conclusion that the egg had to come first, but it did not specificly need a chicken to keep it warm etc etc.. mutation, evolution whatever.. if you want to make a somewhat funny child joke, you could just say that the chicken came first, because god created animals, not eggs...
Chicken or egg? Neither, both are derivations from the archaeopteryx, as a result of divergent evolution, and the culmination of reproductive isolating mechanisms resulting in allopatric speciation. Morphological similarities, homologous structures, amino acid and DNA similarities, fossil records along with numerous other sources have shed light on this very issue. Such a paradox can only exist without sound understanding of molecular biology or quantum physics. Sorry if I'm being harsh.
why the hell did you turn a vid about someone showing off their animation skills into a religious debate?
and WHY THE HELL are you even talking about religion on the INTERNET in the first place, don't people realize by now that arguing about religion on the internet is pointless?
Hallo, it is a good work, I like this chickens foot step...Is it Maya? Any way you keep the principle of animation, and good sound effect...i thinking the story concept..It is a bad thinking…because as a viewer
We are like a very good and dreamy ending …. But it s good, a good concept, develop it
Why is everyone arguing about God and evolution? The video is cool, well thought out, the sounds great, and the chickie is cute! Awesome blender animation!
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do tomorrow will be the best day of your life
Ok so the answer is based upon whether you're an athiest or you're religious involving the beliefs of Creationism. To the top to comments currently, you're just as stupid considering your "facts" have been disputed time and time again.
the dispute over the chicken and the egg has already been examined and proven. the chicken came first. evolution shows that birds evolved from reptiles, reptiles evolved from fish and fish evolved from asexual bacteria over a span of millions of years. the first fish laid eggs, the first reptiles laid eggs and the first chicken laid an egg. so...lets move on.
"In the summer of 2010, British researchers cracked the eneggma when they discovered that the protein necessary to create the eggshell was fowlnd exclusively in the ovaries of the chicken. So the chicken had to come first, because the eggshell can't be made without that protein." -From Cracked's Article "7 Simple Questions You Won't Believe Science Just Answered."
I was talking to 'karmadeath'. do some research before trying to insult a way of life. In science itself research must be done to prove a theory which evolution& continental drift were. do the same for islam/judaism watever ''We made from water every living thing'' Qur'an, Al Anbiya (a chapter). This was recited over 1400 years ago. Scientists just discovered this. Islam explains science, not the other way around. if you want more proof I'll gladly give you more.quranandsciencedotcom
adaptations and mutations from different species caused the egg to happen like in the ancient times when amphibians which are our ancestors came to land and layer hard shelled eggs and then those eggs evolved into reptilians which then of course turned to dinosaurs and as we all know it turned into the birds of today so nothing came first it's just an old question to make you ponder my friends. :)
the chicken and the egg analogy is similar to the big bang in the fact that you need a higher power to "spark" life ie "big bang" you cant make life without a "God" you cant have a "big bang" with nothing... no man can prove the big bang he can only unfold the story and events AFTER the unexplainable...are you following me? im saying i believe in the evolution of life but i find it funny to think an explosion can from nothing. get it? THUMBS UP
Ohlololol too funny comments :D how about this; the egg came first, cause the chicken evolved from a previous ancestral species. The chicken moved away from that species bit by bit with tiny mutations. Those mutations however are formed in the forming process of an embryo/foetus. It's quite simple: a species lays an egg - the egg produces that species, but with a minor mutation; so the thing that comes out, is the ancestor of the chicken, a primitive chicken.
the egg couldn't be the first (for those who think it was) cuz the eggs can't hatch if it's not warm and taking care of....why do you think the the mother chicken sits on the eggs?....to keep them warm and protect them....complicated question answered tough a simple and logical answer....not some stupid theory
@alemeyo so, what, you think the chickens were just there, popped an egg and continued producing more chickens? just like everything else, their ancestors started suffering said mutations, which caused the product of the egg to change drasticly over time, dus producing what we know as chicken. Ancestor -> egg -> chicken -> and a cicle. Try thinking beyond just like OgreWorld1 said. Out of the box, so to speak. Out of the egg, and beyond the chicken :)
@bCupon i'm just finding it hard to believe that the egg came first;lets say it did and the chicken hatched from that egg,then what?...how was it possible for that little chick to survive without some guidance....how was it able to survive alone...to keep itself warm at night to find food and shelter when it just came out of an egg; i respect your theory and i don't deny it could have happened that way too;but we just have to stick in what we believe since there's no way to prove it otherwise
@alemeyo Well put, I personally think that with every new generation, species evolved and mutated, but that didn't meant that it's ancestors didn't take care of them as usual. All I care is that there are chickens. Other than that, I'm fine with it. I like the egs and I find the little baby chickens cute haha.
religion is stupid it was 'created' to help people think, learn, and teach lessons but instead creates wars and arguments so stupid...has anyone ever wondered why there are tons of religions?they cant all be real.
@celluoiddify the religion has been invented to coerce people....mainly so that the laws can be respected, to create a safe society....with the help of the religions we managed to restrain people for 1000 of years....it was the only way to create a sense of fear
Scientifically: Dinosaurs laid eggs millions of years before chickens. Reptiles before that, and fish before that. The real question is about a 'chicken egg', which relies on the definition of the term. If a chicken egg has to be laid by a chicken, or has to hatch into a chicken. Since Chicken eggs hatch Chicks, not Chickens, it could be argued that way, but honestly, it depends largely on definition of terms.
Or on religion. From that side, God will pwn you for asking the question. >8( lol
It depends on your views, if you religous and think that all the animals just popped onto earth then its was the chicken first, but if you listen to logic and reason and evolution than it was the egg.
@CursedOrb I'm sorry but how is evolution logic and reason, you think that life comes from non-life even though that was proved impossible with scientific experiments many years ago.
@TheCyberChimp Did I ever say non-life? I didnt, there has always been life, everywhere, It just needs that spark or start to get a hold and evolve. There is proven life on mars, those small microscopic animals, the same thing that populates earth and always did. And yes non-life can not produce life, so how can all the animals just be popped onto earth from "god"?
@CursedOrb Oh wait yeah that's right God did make life, i don't see any other way for it to be possible since we both know life can't come from non life
I noticed that it was supposed to be a loop, 'cause the start and end poses were almost exactly the same. You should make the video loop using annotations! Cory Mr. Safety at SMPfilms has a video teaching people how to do it!
ok, no offense, but you you never got ur fair share of logic if you are even ARGUING this topic. much better question: where did the chicken (or the egg) come from ?
Fish were laying eggs hundreds of millions of years before land animals of any sort ever existed. It should also be noted that the chicken is a subspecies of the Red Junglefowl, & is therefore the domesticated decendent of the other species.
So, one need ask a better question, since this question has a difinitive answer, why is it still being asked?
LOL people getting pissed off at one and other over the same question that has been going for years...... people get over it lol its a dumb question anyway no one knows what came frist.... besides there are people who believe in one thing and others believe in another thing.... this is where war begins so chill everyone
lol, evolutionary arguments. Ok here's the thing, It's imposable to PROVE evolution. There are so many flaws in the THEORY, there's a reason is still a THEORY. And before you go all "blah blah but you can't prove God blah blah" yeah I know that's why it's a religion.
@Caiomhin98 That's because religions were created as a result of people not understanding complex things. The proof behind that is every religion contains made up "stories" to fill in the gaps that science could not explain in that time period.
Such as, evolution, the fact that the earth wasn't created in 7 days by a mystical character but in millions of years, and ultimatly that we know how stars from and when the universe started.
@Caiomhin98 honestly I don't know what to believe in, I choose to believe in god because why not believe in something in case. rather something than nothing.
@shelbayehfood And just so you know i believe in God too, Jesus and all that good stuff. But your setting a horrible example of free thinkers and lovers of God and the truth by arguing over a chicken and egg on youtube. Just sayin.
@ilovemaxims "a horrible example of free thinkers"
are you kidding me? He's given many examples of facts and his own mind to you and you completely ignored him.
"arguing over a chicken"
if you look at your argument its at least a few pages, so if you're going to accuse him of arguing over something stupid, you're a fucking hippocrite.
@JoeArbiter Ignored him? Ignored what his confused rants? Might i add Pointless rants. It is a horrible example of free thinkers AND lovers of God. He is generalizing and speaking for more than himself and im just clearafying that he cant speak for people like me that love God and believe in him just as much yet dont waste time arguing about it on youtube. The point of these comments is to be twards the video about what YOUR idea is. Knocking down other peoples ideas is rude and uncalled for.
@ilovemaxims but you see, you are a hippocrite, because you DID accuse him of arguing over 'something stupid' did you not? Well you also participated according to several pages of this video, therefore making you a hippocrite. I'm not going to argue any more unless I forget about this line, but really I'm bothered that you called him on something that you also did, there are no more variables to this segment of the argument so the sooner you accept the fact, the better.
@JoeArbiter Ok well excuse me for trying to end something silly. I always see people arguing on here and find it ridiculous, it wasnt what i was trying to do, i was trying to end it and shed some light on how silly it all really was. Maybe i should have gone about it differently.
i wasnt arguing about chickens or eggs, i was arguing about how he made no sense. Do you understand anything he said? all he did was repeat himself Now i am not arguing, you seem very reasonable so please enlighten me
@JoeArbiter I didnt repeat myself. But im done with this argument...its not going anywhere lol. We have different views obviously. lets leave it at that shall we? Bye.
Responder a este vídeo... Also, if you even read his comments and understood them care to explain why he simply repeats himself ignoring what i am saying? yeah hypocrite my ass. The only reason i am even responding to you is because i will not be called a hypocrite for undeserving reasons. So fuck you for that, make sense or gtfo.
@shelbayehfood why are u being so complicated? "the fabric shop of eggs inside the CHECKIN"? hahahahhaha dude your triipin. Im starting to think this is all a joke to you and you know how much you dont make sense...accually i hope thats it cause if its not i feel bad for you :(
go live your life and stop worrying about factories with "chickins" and imaginary employees and sperm. :)
lets make the difference between a CHICKEN egg, and just a normal egg.
It is true that the egg existed first, because the chicken is just a mutation from another species. Thats what we call evolution. But if you ask the same question, and replace the egg for a CHICKEN egg, then the chicken was first. Because in this situation, the egg must be layed by a chicken. :)
@snellekogel3 I see it this way: Before the hen, there was another race... lets say dinosaur. At the very point the classifisation shifts from dinosaur to chicken/hen, we have a chicken/hen from the egg. So the chicken was a offspring of a non-hen... Egg first! :-)
@snellekogel3 yeah i know, it was just to... cut it out in paper, as you say in Denmark... (making it easy to understand) But honestly; it's a hilarious conversation after all... Who want's fried eggs? :D
Hold on, where did this Quran stuff come from? Don't judge religions! So if the parents of the egg were a different species, the hatchling would be the same or similar species to the parents, not randomly a chicken. The chicken came first. And don't you dare bring religion into this cuz I am not part of any religion.
You don't believe in evolution because of your irrational belief in the Quran. You're nothing but a delusional religious idiot so you'll never accept the evolutionary facts that I just explained to you. The egg came first because of the way evolution works, it could be no other way but no amount of logic will ever make a dent in your opinion so shut up you fucktard.
"The principles of evolution dictate the exact opposite"
NO, THEY DON"T. Species can only change BEFORE BIRTH. This means that the very first chicken had to come from an egg as it's parents were technically a different species. The chicken in the egg had parents, but they technically weren't chickens. It's a simple concept and yet you can't understand it - go back and read all my posts again as you just aren't getting what I am saying. You must be a creationist.
I'm not sure why you keep posting the same identical argument to me that I have already refuted. This explanation was wrong the first time and it's still wrong now. Copy and paste this same explanation again and guess what - it will STILL be wrong. Repeating something over and over does NOT make it true - that's the technique your religion uses in an attempt to brainwash people but it does not work on free-thinkers like me.
You just posted the exact same argument again - identical to your first post which I just refuted. I explained exactly why the egg HAD to come before the chicken because of how evolution works and you just completely ignored what I said. Are you a robot incapable of forming new thoughts?
And just for your info - male chickens are called roosters and female chickens are called hens - you seem to have some confusion there. AGAIN, neither are called "hence". Go get some education
Like a typical religious fundamentalist you are too ignorant to understand the simple principles of evolution that show the egg MUST have come before the chicken. You can't think beyond the Quran and never will since you were indoctrinated since birth to believe in such nonsense.
@CaneFu I am a physicist and I believe in God, why do people have to think that just because someone believes in God, it means that the person has to discard science or free thinking. God gave us free will, if you haven't read the Bible or the Qur'an. So stop putting down people for believing in God, what proof do you have that God doesn't exist. Just because you don't see him doesn't mean nothing. It is like saying bacteria doesn't exist because you cannot see microbial life without an aparatus
@CaneFu - Like it or not the fathers of modern science, Galileo, Newton and Lemaitre (founder of the theory of big bang) were Catholics. Science and faith are not opposites. But you say "fundamentalist"Catholics as proof of your religious intolerance. Science has not shown who came first: the chicken or the egg. End.
"wow you're such a bitch, insulting someone because he believes in God..."
I am not insulting him for believing in a god, I am insulting him for refusing to believe in the proven factual science of evolution. What one believes in beyond that I don't really care but if you are going to vote and help decide important issues then you owe it to the rest of us to be educated enough to know the difference between fact and fantasy. Believing in Creationism is pure nonsense.
@CaneFu Ugh, I'm atheist and honestly, QUIT FIGHTING OVER THIS! It isn't nonsense at all! It's what they believe, and you can't just call someone wrong because of their beliefs. That's pretty much the same of me calling you wrong because you voted for Obama.
You obviously have a reading comprehension problem as you didn't understand my post so go read it again - and this time read it slowly. I said that I don't insult anyone for their religious beliefs, I insult people that say they don't believe in proven factual science and don't know the difference between fact and fantasy. You're obviously a boob.
@CaneFu and who appointed you to say who should believe what......not believing is pure nonsense....someday you will be the one that gets surprised....
I won't be surprised and neither will you be, because when we're both dead we won't have anymore thought processes.. Believe what you want but no one can offer even one shred of evidence for an afterlife and the nonsense is that people still cling to such fairy tales.
Now I don't care to get into a religious debate with you because I have been in thousands of them and they go nowhere. You believe in religion only because you want to, not because of any real evidence you can offer.
I won't be surprised and neither will you be, because when we're both dead we won't have anymore thought processes.. Believe what you want but no one can offer even one shred of evidence for an afterlife and the nonsense is that people still cling to such fairy tales.
Now I don't care to get into a religious debate with you because I have been in thousands of them and they go nowhere. You believe in religion only because you want to, not because of any real evidence you can offer.
I won't be surprised and neither will you be, because when we're both dead we won't have anymore thought processes.. Believe what you want but no one can offer even one shred of evidence for an afterlife and the nonsense is that people still cling to such fairy tales.
Now I don't care to get into a religious debate with you because I have been in thousands of them and they go nowhere. You believe in religion only because you want to, not because of any real evidence you can offer.
do you even know what Islam is? stop acting like you know who was a muslim from birth, even if they were so what? if you were brought up with the 'priniciples of evolution' from birth does that make you a boob? if islam is such nonsense i wonder why 1400 years ago it stated life began in water. try doing research into a way of life before insulting it. dont bother replying until you get actual research from the Quran and not people who spend their lives circulating miconceptions
@CaneFu You can shove your Science up your ass as you're too ignorant to actually understand religion is not merely based upon evolution. If you feel the need to degrade people then at least get your info straight before you start spouting shit out of your mouth. You sir, need to chill the fuck out.
Wow, you really don't understand what the question is about. This question isn't about a specific chicken, but the species of chickens. You completely miss the point as the parents also came from eggs or don't you get that? You are simply naming one specific sex act and ignoring the long line of chickens before that. At some point if you go back far enough in evolution the parents will not be chickens exactly but a different species and what hatches will be the FIRST chicken.
From an "evolutionists" viewpoint the egg would come first because a chicken-like being would have layed it and it would be different from its parents.
From a "creationists" viewpoint the chicken came first because it says so in the bible.. etc....
So depending on whether you're a creationist or an evolution believer the answer changes.
The only problem with your attempt at being diplomatic here is that you are giving false importance to creationism, treating it as an alternative theory to evolution, which it is NOT. Call the religious fundamentalists out for what they are - WRONG. Political correctness does not apply when people are severely delusional and post nonsense - shelbayehfood believes in Islamic fundamentalism and thinks the Quran is the most perfect science book ever written.
YOU'RE WRONG - the rooster & the chicken parents came from eggs too. All life is descended from the sea and chickens are descended from egg-laying fish as we are descended from live-bearing fish. Chickens have always laid eggs, long before they were chickens. DNA changes to a new species are only made BEFORE birth, not after so the egg had to exist before it was a chicken. You are either a Creationist or just don't understand evolutionary science - either way you're wrong.
The egg came first and this is indisputable - at some point for the animal to evolve from an ancestral life form into a chicken it's DNA had to change and DNA can only be changed before birth, not after. But it's also a stupid question based on entirely on Creationism because...
The changes from ancestral life forms to modern chickens were such a gradual transition that one would have trouble deciding at what point along the evolutionary scale to classify the animal as a chicken.
1. Two different animals sexually interacted to lay the egg of the chicken.(Like a lion and a tiger= liger)
2. Through adaptation and natural selection the chicken slowly evolved from one thing to another. So the modern chicken today, came from an egg of an early ancestor
Thats doesn't explain anything, its just you telling me what your religious beliefs are, im non religous, so i ask you If the chicken came first how did it come to be,
twas the egg first =].. the egg was a fish then an alligator then maybe a walking thing then it decided it needed useless wings so evolved into a chicken but by that point the egg has been there for like... ages >_>.. boom, evolution for the win fuck you god
the egg. dinosaurs were members of the bird family. 1 dinosaur was born with feathers, it mated with a another dinosaur with feathers and laid an egg that hatched into a chicken.
@shelbayehfood In sorry to differ but if u say the rooster and the chicken must exist first, were they born alive and not in egg form?, they must have come from eggs too, if u follow evolution, the parents of the first chicken must not count as a chicken specie, so the first living animal that can be caled a chicken must have all the qualities of a chicken including coming form an egg, hence the first chicken must be in egg form, the egg came first.
im an vegetarian so egg
stjepanzero 2 days ago
Chicken first !
sccatke 6 days ago
Well next time someone says "what come first, the chicken or the egg?" Ill send them this
CharliesGirl1986 1 week ago
Look: This video is cool, period. No need to start a debate over it.
abtarabishy 1 week ago
XFch..qrebyjy yjrhfvsvdmf: %;;'*$@,+5;
sileCC 2 weeks ago
wtf?!
madebytaschiii 1 month ago
sperm or human..???
Jaringan2 1 month ago
I dont care both taste good
james12335 1 month ago
Chicken is a long related cousin to dinosaurs, they are evolved dinosaurs, much like us humans are evolved monkeys, so the chicken, infact, came first
heated1814svlog 1 month ago
doesnt matter which comes first, fried chicken taste good.....
hunkkisable 2 months ago
:o Isn't it supposed to replay D:
catwomen61 2 months ago
THE EGG WAS FIRST
dinosaurs also had eggs :p
1998lowbacca 2 months ago
i think the chiken was genetically created to serve nutrition neeeds of maybe pre man im not sure all i no is we aint clevver these days who knows what happened thousands oy years ago all we have is books like the bible so we are so blind
smellybyebe 2 months ago
I agree (to some level) with Blazflare.. if you really want to solve such a thing, look at its history.. I believe eventually you come to the conclusion that the egg had to come first, but it did not specificly need a chicken to keep it warm etc etc.. mutation, evolution whatever.. if you want to make a somewhat funny child joke, you could just say that the chicken came first, because god created animals, not eggs...
BigMisterApple 2 months ago
egg came first.. dinosaurs lay'd eggs :D
thakillernl 2 months ago
Chicken or egg? Neither, both are derivations from the archaeopteryx, as a result of divergent evolution, and the culmination of reproductive isolating mechanisms resulting in allopatric speciation. Morphological similarities, homologous structures, amino acid and DNA similarities, fossil records along with numerous other sources have shed light on this very issue. Such a paradox can only exist without sound understanding of molecular biology or quantum physics. Sorry if I'm being harsh.
blazflare 3 months ago
What comes first the chicken or the egg.......... neither it comes from eddies ass :D
Erickboy8 3 months ago
sperm & ovum first!
FlyingArmy 3 months ago
which one go first a maother or a baby, which one go first a chicken or an egg... stupid question
garysmart1 3 months ago
maybe the chicken evolved from a mammal, thus starting to lay and egg, i dont think eggs pops up out or nowhere...or do they? o.o
tshaiyanique 3 months ago
CHICKENS? NOPE, CHUCK TESTA
zythepsarian 3 months ago
Eggs came first - reptiles were laying eggs for millions of years before the bird
DillingerEscapeMan 3 months ago
@DillingerEscapeMan so a reptile gave birth to a chicken
tshaiyanique 3 months ago
@tshaiyanique Reptiles were laying eggs millions of years before chickens existed - therefore eggs came first
DillingerEscapeMan 3 months ago
@DillingerEscapeMan so what come first the egg or the reptile?
tshaiyanique 3 months ago
should have made it loop
kinggabe314 3 months ago
Pretty simple answer: the egg was there before the chicken, a couple of 100 million years earlier. if you believe in evolution that is....
thumbs up if you believe in evolution
immunetocommonsense 4 months ago
@immunetocommonsense but who or what layed the egg? it must popped out of something
tshaiyanique 3 months ago
E a vida continua...
Além de fato de termos essa consciência, é preciso viver a vida de forma intensa a cada dia..., pois tudo passa e a vida continua.
MsPsicopedagogia 4 months ago
well, chicken is tumor inside of her belly
cillitafresh92 4 months ago
i've just got 2 questions for the folks here...
why the hell did you turn a vid about someone showing off their animation skills into a religious debate?
and WHY THE HELL are you even talking about religion on the INTERNET in the first place, don't people realize by now that arguing about religion on the internet is pointless?
Link500ACS 4 months ago
which first ? chicken or egg ? there's no start between those two .
palooza100 5 months ago
was it constipated?
sasukeiscool14 5 months ago
Hallo, it is a good work, I like this chickens foot step...Is it Maya? Any way you keep the principle of animation, and good sound effect...i thinking the story concept..It is a bad thinking…because as a viewer
We are like a very good and dreamy ending …. But it s good, a good concept, develop it
Garciathomas100 6 months ago
Why is everyone arguing about God and evolution? The video is cool, well thought out, the sounds great, and the chickie is cute! Awesome blender animation!
SkyBubbleful 6 months ago 4
@SkyBubbleful shut up
Rastaziggy 6 months ago in playlist Dancing cartoons
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do tomorrow will be the best day of your life
kirbyrules2000 6 months ago
Come on people, do we really have to turn everything into a religious conversation?
AnimeQueenie888 6 months ago 10
@AnimeQueenie888
YES
Jlemay117 3 months ago
Tonytouchzz if god didn't exist we wouldn't b here right now
chohlbau 6 months ago
@chohlbau i think he was joking. haha.
ilovemaxims 6 months ago
God wispered me a secret last night, he told me he doesnt exist
tonytouchzz 6 months ago 2
Ok so the answer is based upon whether you're an athiest or you're religious involving the beliefs of Creationism. To the top to comments currently, you're just as stupid considering your "facts" have been disputed time and time again.
redsoxfinatic77 6 months ago
@redsoxfinatic77 finally someone who makes fucking sense. i was starting to think i was going crazy.
ilovemaxims 6 months ago
The egg.
Fish layed eggs long before chickens evolved.
DeeplyShalllow 6 months ago
the dispute over the chicken and the egg has already been examined and proven. the chicken came first. evolution shows that birds evolved from reptiles, reptiles evolved from fish and fish evolved from asexual bacteria over a span of millions of years. the first fish laid eggs, the first reptiles laid eggs and the first chicken laid an egg. so...lets move on.
zheffner666 7 months ago
"In the summer of 2010, British researchers cracked the eneggma when they discovered that the protein necessary to create the eggshell was fowlnd exclusively in the ovaries of the chicken. So the chicken had to come first, because the eggshell can't be made without that protein." -From Cracked's Article "7 Simple Questions You Won't Believe Science Just Answered."
mynintendo 7 months ago
can a baby take care of itself? no. so it would be the chicken.
wrestlemainiaxxxxxiv 7 months ago
@wrestlemainiaxxxxxiv it can if it's a baby horse.
you lose.
InternetLad 6 months ago
@InternetLad chickens are far from horses. it isint over, this is just the beginning >:)
wrestlemainiaxxxxxiv 6 months ago
@Canefu
I was talking to 'karmadeath'. do some research before trying to insult a way of life. In science itself research must be done to prove a theory which evolution& continental drift were. do the same for islam/judaism watever ''We made from water every living thing'' Qur'an, Al Anbiya (a chapter). This was recited over 1400 years ago. Scientists just discovered this. Islam explains science, not the other way around. if you want more proof I'll gladly give you more.quranandsciencedotcom
Pomegranat0 7 months ago
This is the funniest comments thread ever.
I bet the guy creating the animation never suspected it would trigger 7 pages of comments on which of the egg or the chicken came first.
Come on people! Leave it, go and get a life for god's sake.
I'm off.
elpharam 7 months ago
Velicoraptor.
TehEvilSpork 7 months ago
This is one of the most unreaveled mysteries ever!
Deadpool948 7 months ago
Am I the only one a little concerned?
6KingCooper6 7 months ago
OK You guys LISTEN UP coz I'm about to settle this 'what came 1st' arguement once 'n' for all...
The answer is...
THE EGG... That was laid by a T-rex ^_^
panthakurai 7 months ago
it is just sad what happens to the chicken:(
blackstar201188 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1 put ur hand over ur mouth
2 make a wish into it
3 make ur hand into a fist
4 put ur fist to ur hart for 4 to 5 seconds
5 post this to 3 more videos
6 today will be the best of ur life
angelawilliams222 7 months ago
AND ALL OF YOU STOP ARGUING!! just watch the damn animation or don't comment at all.. gawd
TheBeast6664 7 months ago 2
adaptations and mutations from different species caused the egg to happen like in the ancient times when amphibians which are our ancestors came to land and layer hard shelled eggs and then those eggs evolved into reptilians which then of course turned to dinosaurs and as we all know it turned into the birds of today so nothing came first it's just an old question to make you ponder my friends. :)
TheBeast6664 7 months ago
Comment removed
NGiannini12 7 months ago
How did a chicken hatch from an infertile egg?
NGiannini12 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the chicken and the egg analogy is similar to the big bang in the fact that you need a higher power to "spark" life ie "big bang" you cant make life without a "God" you cant have a "big bang" with nothing... no man can prove the big bang he can only unfold the story and events AFTER the unexplainable...are you following me? im saying i believe in the evolution of life but i find it funny to think an explosion can from nothing. get it? THUMBS UP
killuminati1871 7 months ago
Ohlololol too funny comments :D how about this; the egg came first, cause the chicken evolved from a previous ancestral species. The chicken moved away from that species bit by bit with tiny mutations. Those mutations however are formed in the forming process of an embryo/foetus. It's quite simple: a species lays an egg - the egg produces that species, but with a minor mutation; so the thing that comes out, is the ancestor of the chicken, a primitive chicken.
OgreWorld 8 months ago
There were first birds that evolved into chickens then had eggs. So the eggs came first.
dogsiter4567 8 months ago 2
the egg couldn't be the first (for those who think it was) cuz the eggs can't hatch if it's not warm and taking care of....why do you think the the mother chicken sits on the eggs?....to keep them warm and protect them....complicated question answered tough a simple and logical answer....not some stupid theory
alemeyo 8 months ago
@alemeyo The egg that produced the primitive chicken was taken care of by the 'previous' species. It's a nice theory, but think beyond.
OgreWorld 8 months ago
@OgreWorld what previous species?
alemeyo 7 months ago
@alemeyo so, what, you think the chickens were just there, popped an egg and continued producing more chickens? just like everything else, their ancestors started suffering said mutations, which caused the product of the egg to change drasticly over time, dus producing what we know as chicken. Ancestor -> egg -> chicken -> and a cicle. Try thinking beyond just like OgreWorld1 said. Out of the box, so to speak. Out of the egg, and beyond the chicken :)
bCupon 7 months ago
@bCupon i'm just finding it hard to believe that the egg came first;lets say it did and the chicken hatched from that egg,then what?...how was it possible for that little chick to survive without some guidance....how was it able to survive alone...to keep itself warm at night to find food and shelter when it just came out of an egg; i respect your theory and i don't deny it could have happened that way too;but we just have to stick in what we believe since there's no way to prove it otherwise
alemeyo 7 months ago
@alemeyo Well put, I personally think that with every new generation, species evolved and mutated, but that didn't meant that it's ancestors didn't take care of them as usual. All I care is that there are chickens. Other than that, I'm fine with it. I like the egs and I find the little baby chickens cute haha.
bCupon 7 months ago
@alemeyo
PLEASE, go read the process of evolution and all your questions are answered - and YES, it can and is proven.
CaneFu 7 months ago 2
religion is stupid it was 'created' to help people think, learn, and teach lessons but instead creates wars and arguments so stupid...has anyone ever wondered why there are tons of religions?they cant all be real.
celluoiddify 8 months ago
@celluoiddify the religion has been invented to coerce people....mainly so that the laws can be respected, to create a safe society....with the help of the religions we managed to restrain people for 1000 of years....it was the only way to create a sense of fear
alemeyo 8 months ago
@alemeyo yes i also agree wtih this :P
celluoiddify 7 months ago
awesome! :D
Joblopz 8 months ago
The Egg must have come first cuz for a chicken you need a egg :-D
But on the other side there must be a chicken to get a egg XD
im getting crazy by thinking on it :-)
game2912 8 months ago
Is it not obvious that Chick-fil-A came first?
WhiteLionKing10 8 months ago
Some close relative of a chicken laid an egg with a chicken in it. That's how I figure it.
TehAl3X 8 months ago 3
hahaha nice animation check mine out
datdanstudios 8 months ago
Scientifically: Dinosaurs laid eggs millions of years before chickens. Reptiles before that, and fish before that. The real question is about a 'chicken egg', which relies on the definition of the term. If a chicken egg has to be laid by a chicken, or has to hatch into a chicken. Since Chicken eggs hatch Chicks, not Chickens, it could be argued that way, but honestly, it depends largely on definition of terms.
Or on religion. From that side, God will pwn you for asking the question. >8( lol
IamCoalfoot 8 months ago
It depends on your views, if you religous and think that all the animals just popped onto earth then its was the chicken first, but if you listen to logic and reason and evolution than it was the egg.
CursedOrb 9 months ago
@CursedOrb I'm sorry but how is evolution logic and reason, you think that life comes from non-life even though that was proved impossible with scientific experiments many years ago.
TheCyberChimp 8 months ago
@TheCyberChimp Did I ever say non-life? I didnt, there has always been life, everywhere, It just needs that spark or start to get a hold and evolve. There is proven life on mars, those small microscopic animals, the same thing that populates earth and always did. And yes non-life can not produce life, so how can all the animals just be popped onto earth from "god"?
CursedOrb 8 months ago
@CursedOrb So you're saying there's always been life everywhere? so how can all the life just be popped onto earth from "god"?
and they haven't PROVED life on Mars, they have pictures of things, nothing more.
TheCyberChimp 8 months ago
Comment removed
TheCyberChimp 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CursedOrb Oh wait yeah that's right God did make life, i don't see any other way for it to be possible since we both know life can't come from non life
TheCyberChimp 8 months ago
that was nice wasnt it?
2203bex 9 months ago
Thumbs up so he can see this:
I noticed that it was supposed to be a loop, 'cause the start and end poses were almost exactly the same. You should make the video loop using annotations! Cory Mr. Safety at SMPfilms has a video teaching people how to do it!
YOU HAVE TO DO IT!
UnpredictableProduct 9 months ago
Ahaahahhahahaah,sa gjO e bukuuuur...:)))
Laluci007 9 months ago
catolicism or science? is the same thing...
chorileto 9 months ago
ok, no offense, but you you never got ur fair share of logic if you are even ARGUING this topic. much better question: where did the chicken (or the egg) come from ?
makewar17 9 months ago
@makewar17 To answer the question is NEITHER.
Fish were laying eggs hundreds of millions of years before land animals of any sort ever existed. It should also be noted that the chicken is a subspecies of the Red Junglefowl, & is therefore the domesticated decendent of the other species.
So, one need ask a better question, since this question has a difinitive answer, why is it still being asked?
EntinludeX 8 months ago
LOL people getting pissed off at one and other over the same question that has been going for years...... people get over it lol its a dumb question anyway no one knows what came frist.... besides there are people who believe in one thing and others believe in another thing.... this is where war begins so chill everyone
KittyKat200785 9 months ago
ein teufelskreis
MrPlaya2012 9 months ago
the chicken preceded the egg by nearly three minutes.
StormsFishingNMore 9 months ago
lol, evolutionary arguments. Ok here's the thing, It's imposable to PROVE evolution. There are so many flaws in the THEORY, there's a reason is still a THEORY. And before you go all "blah blah but you can't prove God blah blah" yeah I know that's why it's a religion.
TheCyberChimp 9 months ago
@TheCyberChimp So many flaws in evolution? We have flaws, sure, but far less than flaws in religion.
Caiomhin98 8 months ago 7
@Caiomhin98 name some flaws in Christianity.
TheCyberChimp 8 months ago
@TheCyberChimp Hahaha, it's like you're asking me to read the entire dictionary or something. Look them up.
Caiomhin98 8 months ago
@Caiomhin98 u should just look for the right religion man ... believe me u'll know it in ur heart if u look in every religion out there
amgaaaaad 6 months ago
@Caiomhin98 the universe is flawed, why? even God never predicted that all will be flawed. the paradise is just a concept. a concept of make believe.
69liberation 5 months ago
@69liberation Well I guess God isn't very good at his job if he can't predict flaws.
Caiomhin98 4 months ago
@Caiomhin98 That's because religions were created as a result of people not understanding complex things. The proof behind that is every religion contains made up "stories" to fill in the gaps that science could not explain in that time period.
Such as, evolution, the fact that the earth wasn't created in 7 days by a mystical character but in millions of years, and ultimatly that we know how stars from and when the universe started.
NextGenGFX 4 months ago
@Caiomhin98 honestly I don't know what to believe in, I choose to believe in god because why not believe in something in case. rather something than nothing.
JLUFantasy 4 months ago
@shelbayehfood And just so you know i believe in God too, Jesus and all that good stuff. But your setting a horrible example of free thinkers and lovers of God and the truth by arguing over a chicken and egg on youtube. Just sayin.
ilovemaxims 9 months ago
@ilovemaxims "a horrible example of free thinkers"
are you kidding me? He's given many examples of facts and his own mind to you and you completely ignored him.
"arguing over a chicken"
if you look at your argument its at least a few pages, so if you're going to accuse him of arguing over something stupid, you're a fucking hippocrite.
JoeArbiter 6 months ago
@JoeArbiter Ignored him? Ignored what his confused rants? Might i add Pointless rants. It is a horrible example of free thinkers AND lovers of God. He is generalizing and speaking for more than himself and im just clearafying that he cant speak for people like me that love God and believe in him just as much yet dont waste time arguing about it on youtube. The point of these comments is to be twards the video about what YOUR idea is. Knocking down other peoples ideas is rude and uncalled for.
ilovemaxims 6 months ago
@ilovemaxims but you see, you are a hippocrite, because you DID accuse him of arguing over 'something stupid' did you not? Well you also participated according to several pages of this video, therefore making you a hippocrite. I'm not going to argue any more unless I forget about this line, but really I'm bothered that you called him on something that you also did, there are no more variables to this segment of the argument so the sooner you accept the fact, the better.
JoeArbiter 6 months ago
@JoeArbiter Ok well excuse me for trying to end something silly. I always see people arguing on here and find it ridiculous, it wasnt what i was trying to do, i was trying to end it and shed some light on how silly it all really was. Maybe i should have gone about it differently.
i wasnt arguing about chickens or eggs, i was arguing about how he made no sense. Do you understand anything he said? all he did was repeat himself Now i am not arguing, you seem very reasonable so please enlighten me
ilovemaxims 6 months ago
@ilovemaxims I'm still not arguing but it seems as if CaneFu also said that you repeated yourself, yes I happen to understand him a little more.
JoeArbiter 6 months ago
@JoeArbiter I didnt repeat myself. But im done with this argument...its not going anywhere lol. We have different views obviously. lets leave it at that shall we? Bye.
ilovemaxims 6 months ago
@ilovemaxims alright, bye.
JoeArbiter 6 months ago
Responder a este vídeo... Also, if you even read his comments and understood them care to explain why he simply repeats himself ignoring what i am saying? yeah hypocrite my ass. The only reason i am even responding to you is because i will not be called a hypocrite for undeserving reasons. So fuck you for that, make sense or gtfo.
ilovemaxims 6 months ago
@shelbayehfood why are u being so complicated? "the fabric shop of eggs inside the CHECKIN"? hahahahhaha dude your triipin. Im starting to think this is all a joke to you and you know how much you dont make sense...accually i hope thats it cause if its not i feel bad for you :(
go live your life and stop worrying about factories with "chickins" and imaginary employees and sperm. :)
ilovemaxims 9 months ago
@shelbayehfood its rooster dear.
ilovemaxims 9 months ago
lol, this conversation is hillarious.. :)
lets make the difference between a CHICKEN egg, and just a normal egg.
It is true that the egg existed first, because the chicken is just a mutation from another species. Thats what we call evolution. But if you ask the same question, and replace the egg for a CHICKEN egg, then the chicken was first. Because in this situation, the egg must be layed by a chicken. :)
snellekogel3 10 months ago
@snellekogel3 I see it this way: Before the hen, there was another race... lets say dinosaur. At the very point the classifisation shifts from dinosaur to chicken/hen, we have a chicken/hen from the egg. So the chicken was a offspring of a non-hen... Egg first! :-)
(but don't pin me up on it)
MrJeberg 9 months ago
@MrJeberg In my opinion, we're saying the same thing (tell me if I'm rong). But you use dinosaur, and I use another species and evolution. :)
snellekogel3 9 months ago
@snellekogel3 yeah i know, it was just to... cut it out in paper, as you say in Denmark... (making it easy to understand) But honestly; it's a hilarious conversation after all... Who want's fried eggs? :D
MrJeberg 9 months ago
@ CaneFu
Hold on, where did this Quran stuff come from? Don't judge religions! So if the parents of the egg were a different species, the hatchling would be the same or similar species to the parents, not randomly a chicken. The chicken came first. And don't you dare bring religion into this cuz I am not part of any religion.
AlexForWhales 10 months ago
@shelbayehfood
You don't believe in evolution because of your irrational belief in the Quran. You're nothing but a delusional religious idiot so you'll never accept the evolutionary facts that I just explained to you. The egg came first because of the way evolution works, it could be no other way but no amount of logic will ever make a dent in your opinion so shut up you fucktard.
CaneFu 10 months ago
The comment war below is beyond hilarious.
The egg came first.
ddrmaxman 10 months ago
@shelbayehfood
You keep repeating the same thing over and over and I've already disproved it - are you retarded?
CaneFu 10 months ago
@ArchangelVsWorld
"The principles of evolution dictate the exact opposite"
NO, THEY DON"T. Species can only change BEFORE BIRTH. This means that the very first chicken had to come from an egg as it's parents were technically a different species. The chicken in the egg had parents, but they technically weren't chickens. It's a simple concept and yet you can't understand it - go back and read all my posts again as you just aren't getting what I am saying. You must be a creationist.
CaneFu 10 months ago
@shelbayehfood
I'm not sure why you keep posting the same identical argument to me that I have already refuted. This explanation was wrong the first time and it's still wrong now. Copy and paste this same explanation again and guess what - it will STILL be wrong. Repeating something over and over does NOT make it true - that's the technique your religion uses in an attempt to brainwash people but it does not work on free-thinkers like me.
CaneFu 10 months ago 18
@CaneFu AGREED! he/she did the same to me! Why argue if your not gonna make sense whatsoever.
ilovemaxims 6 months ago
@shelbayehfood
You just posted the exact same argument again - identical to your first post which I just refuted. I explained exactly why the egg HAD to come before the chicken because of how evolution works and you just completely ignored what I said. Are you a robot incapable of forming new thoughts?
And just for your info - male chickens are called roosters and female chickens are called hens - you seem to have some confusion there. AGAIN, neither are called "hence". Go get some education
CaneFu 10 months ago
@shelbayehfood
Like a typical religious fundamentalist you are too ignorant to understand the simple principles of evolution that show the egg MUST have come before the chicken. You can't think beyond the Quran and never will since you were indoctrinated since birth to believe in such nonsense.
You're a complete boob.
CaneFu 10 months ago 15
@CaneFu I am a physicist and I believe in God, why do people have to think that just because someone believes in God, it means that the person has to discard science or free thinking. God gave us free will, if you haven't read the Bible or the Qur'an. So stop putting down people for believing in God, what proof do you have that God doesn't exist. Just because you don't see him doesn't mean nothing. It is like saying bacteria doesn't exist because you cannot see microbial life without an aparatus
monsterhunter445 9 months ago
@monsterhunter445 Your name doesn't seem very "physicist-y"
Caiomhin98 8 months ago
@CaneFu - Like it or not the fathers of modern science, Galileo, Newton and Lemaitre (founder of the theory of big bang) were Catholics. Science and faith are not opposites. But you say "fundamentalist"Catholics as proof of your religious intolerance. Science has not shown who came first: the chicken or the egg. End.
mariocbase 9 months ago
@CaneFu wow you're such a bitch, insulting someone because he believes in God...
almedinbubic 7 months ago
@almedinbubic
"wow you're such a bitch, insulting someone because he believes in God..."
I am not insulting him for believing in a god, I am insulting him for refusing to believe in the proven factual science of evolution. What one believes in beyond that I don't really care but if you are going to vote and help decide important issues then you owe it to the rest of us to be educated enough to know the difference between fact and fantasy. Believing in Creationism is pure nonsense.
CaneFu 7 months ago 18
@CaneFu Ugh, I'm atheist and honestly, QUIT FIGHTING OVER THIS! It isn't nonsense at all! It's what they believe, and you can't just call someone wrong because of their beliefs. That's pretty much the same of me calling you wrong because you voted for Obama.
FogellofDot 5 months ago
@FogellofDot
You obviously have a reading comprehension problem as you didn't understand my post so go read it again - and this time read it slowly. I said that I don't insult anyone for their religious beliefs, I insult people that say they don't believe in proven factual science and don't know the difference between fact and fantasy. You're obviously a boob.
CaneFu 5 months ago
@CaneFu and who appointed you to say who should believe what......not believing is pure nonsense....someday you will be the one that gets surprised....
anittrubu 3 months ago
@anittrubu
I won't be surprised and neither will you be, because when we're both dead we won't have anymore thought processes.. Believe what you want but no one can offer even one shred of evidence for an afterlife and the nonsense is that people still cling to such fairy tales.
Now I don't care to get into a religious debate with you because I have been in thousands of them and they go nowhere. You believe in religion only because you want to, not because of any real evidence you can offer.
CaneFu 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@anittrubu
I won't be surprised and neither will you be, because when we're both dead we won't have anymore thought processes.. Believe what you want but no one can offer even one shred of evidence for an afterlife and the nonsense is that people still cling to such fairy tales.
Now I don't care to get into a religious debate with you because I have been in thousands of them and they go nowhere. You believe in religion only because you want to, not because of any real evidence you can offer.
CaneFu 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@anittrubu
I won't be surprised and neither will you be, because when we're both dead we won't have anymore thought processes.. Believe what you want but no one can offer even one shred of evidence for an afterlife and the nonsense is that people still cling to such fairy tales.
Now I don't care to get into a religious debate with you because I have been in thousands of them and they go nowhere. You believe in religion only because you want to, not because of any real evidence you can offer.
CaneFu 3 months ago
@CaneFu
bomb1234able 2 months ago
@CaneFu
do you even know what Islam is? stop acting like you know who was a muslim from birth, even if they were so what? if you were brought up with the 'priniciples of evolution' from birth does that make you a boob? if islam is such nonsense i wonder why 1400 years ago it stated life began in water. try doing research into a way of life before insulting it. dont bother replying until you get actual research from the Quran and not people who spend their lives circulating miconceptions
Pomegranat0 7 months ago
@Pomegranat0
Scientific evidence for Evolution being true = volumes and volumes of proven facts
Scientific evidence for Islam being true = none whatever
CaneFu 7 months ago
@CaneFu You can shove your Science up your ass as you're too ignorant to actually understand religion is not merely based upon evolution. If you feel the need to degrade people then at least get your info straight before you start spouting shit out of your mouth. You sir, need to chill the fuck out.
That is all :)
redsoxfinatic77 6 months ago
@redsoxfinatic77
Spoken like a true religious fanatic filled with hate for anyone that doesn't believe exactly as you do.
CaneFu 6 months ago
Comment removed
CaneFu 10 months ago
@shelbayehfood
And the word isn't "hence", it's "hen". Is English your second language or are you just an illiterate Creationist?
CaneFu 10 months ago 3
@shelbayehfood
Wow, you really don't understand what the question is about. This question isn't about a specific chicken, but the species of chickens. You completely miss the point as the parents also came from eggs or don't you get that? You are simply naming one specific sex act and ignoring the long line of chickens before that. At some point if you go back far enough in evolution the parents will not be chickens exactly but a different species and what hatches will be the FIRST chicken.
CaneFu 10 months ago 2
GUYS!
From an "evolutionists" viewpoint the egg would come first because a chicken-like being would have layed it and it would be different from its parents.
From a "creationists" viewpoint the chicken came first because it says so in the bible.. etc....
So depending on whether you're a creationist or an evolution believer the answer changes.
Personally I believe the egg came first.
setheries 10 months ago
@setheries
The only problem with your attempt at being diplomatic here is that you are giving false importance to creationism, treating it as an alternative theory to evolution, which it is NOT. Call the religious fundamentalists out for what they are - WRONG. Political correctness does not apply when people are severely delusional and post nonsense - shelbayehfood believes in Islamic fundamentalism and thinks the Quran is the most perfect science book ever written.
CaneFu 10 months ago 3
@CaneFu Eh, just avoiding internet arguments. The egg came first.
setheries 10 months ago
@shelbayehfood
YOU'RE WRONG - the rooster & the chicken parents came from eggs too. All life is descended from the sea and chickens are descended from egg-laying fish as we are descended from live-bearing fish. Chickens have always laid eggs, long before they were chickens. DNA changes to a new species are only made BEFORE birth, not after so the egg had to exist before it was a chicken. You are either a Creationist or just don't understand evolutionary science - either way you're wrong.
CaneFu 10 months ago 2
The egg came first and this is indisputable - at some point for the animal to evolve from an ancestral life form into a chicken it's DNA had to change and DNA can only be changed before birth, not after. But it's also a stupid question based on entirely on Creationism because...
The changes from ancestral life forms to modern chickens were such a gradual transition that one would have trouble deciding at what point along the evolutionary scale to classify the animal as a chicken.
CaneFu 10 months ago 2
the egg came before the chicken for two reasons
1. Two different animals sexually interacted to lay the egg of the chicken.(Like a lion and a tiger= liger)
2. Through adaptation and natural selection the chicken slowly evolved from one thing to another. So the modern chicken today, came from an egg of an early ancestor
shadower1928 10 months ago
Eggs come from space dust.
evo2029 10 months ago
We all come from eggs.
evo2029 10 months ago
i dont get it
TheOrreborre2 10 months ago
So cute
Jackieghosts 10 months ago
clearly the chicken came first because god didnt go around the Earth layin eggs :|
ashbunny2068 10 months ago
@ashbunny2068 Your an idiot. God isn't real.
xxxDarkcloud0xxx 8 months ago
Thats doesn't explain anything, its just you telling me what your religious beliefs are, im non religous, so i ask you If the chicken came first how did it come to be,
TheeDelibird13 10 months ago
@shelbayehfood but how did they come to existence?
TheeDelibird13 10 months ago
@shelbayehfood Nope Egg Fool
dennyfrontier 10 months ago
the egg
andigal70 10 months ago 2
twas the egg first =].. the egg was a fish then an alligator then maybe a walking thing then it decided it needed useless wings so evolved into a chicken but by that point the egg has been there for like... ages >_>.. boom, evolution for the win fuck you god
Cypher791 11 months ago
chicken came first
DONTuLOOKatMEEE123 11 months ago
Chicken + Walking = Baby
legomessiah 11 months ago
@EcoQuennMistress I joined YouTube to say this, ROFL XDD
Blackshades101 11 months ago
the egg. dinosaurs were members of the bird family. 1 dinosaur was born with feathers, it mated with a another dinosaur with feathers and laid an egg that hatched into a chicken.
TopHatSaur 11 months ago
@TopHatSaur No, birds are dinosaurs. The dinosaur egg came first.
gregrutz 11 months ago
its obviously CHICKEN, why is that? its because God created animals in their own images, and God first created Chicken not an EGG. :]
princessy18 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@princessy18 Your an idiot God doesn't exist.
xxxDarkcloud0xxx 8 months ago
Who came first, the chicken or the egg? The answer: Who gives a rat's ass, they both taste great.
EcoQueenMistress 1 year ago
@shelbayehfood In sorry to differ but if u say the rooster and the chicken must exist first, were they born alive and not in egg form?, they must have come from eggs too, if u follow evolution, the parents of the first chicken must not count as a chicken specie, so the first living animal that can be caled a chicken must have all the qualities of a chicken including coming form an egg, hence the first chicken must be in egg form, the egg came first.
markanthonyquiambao 1 year ago