Why did the UN not help the people in palestine for 63 years. Ban Ki Mon and his crew in the UN are obliged to help the palestinian land because palestine is a member of the UN. Free the Palestine Land. UN G20 G8 !!!!
Vundet hvad? Han har fået et nyt job, men KRIGEN er ikke vundet endnu. Det går faktisk ad helvede til, så det er ikke så sært at han er nervøs over at have ansvaret for NATO.
so disappointed at his idea not to send more troops in the field. could be he thinks himself "I DONT TRUST GENERALS ON THE FIELD! THEY ARE JUST WAR MONGERING ASSHOLES! I M THE ONE WHO KNOWS EVERYTHING AND CAN CONTROL EVERYTHING!"
there leaning on the NWO of the "Allies" coming together as a whole and removing the ones who will stop this from happening... i dont think its bad i just like to know im aware of it
20-0-5 may be the biggest ass I've heard in a long time. His/Her intolerance is so far down that there is no way to talk sense to them. At the end of the day I disagree with damn near all of ya..I'm an American Atheist...pretty marginalized in my own country. Why can't you religious morons realize the idea of God with any name is a joke. There is no "God", "Allah", " Yahwey" or whatever name you want to stick on a non-existent concept. Read a Real book instead of your silly religious texts.
Then you're not the brightest of Atheists, since no one can either prove or disprove the existance of god. I'd recommend you to read some books of Dawkins, Harris or Hitchens. Though I am an atheist I would not recommend this approach you're making. You will not able to convince anyone by talking down to them. IMHO: youtube isn't really the place for such a discussion anyway. Peace!
looks like they plan on forcing them to use it against Iran. Since they are letting Iran proceed with their nuke plan, The Israeli's will have no choice but to strike.
Who will allow?? Excuse me but your ignorance is showing.
You are either a super far left anti American, antisemite, anti whatever would help this world progress toward peace, or your one of the radical islamic terorists. Oh wait, that's the same thing.
I refuse to debate with your type, you just need to be canceled.
how about radical Christian terrorists who wages perpetual wars in Muslim countries, under the mask of Freedom, Democracy and Human Rights, to steal more middle eastern OIL!
you refuse to debate with me because you know that your argument are full of hypocrisy.
Israel can have nukes and not a threat to middle-east security or the world, but no other middle eastern country should have nukes.
You are nothing but women and child murderers. You all should be expelled from the earth.
One arguement for the sake of making you even more crazy.
Israel has nukes because they are a peaceful people, if you crazies would leave them alone. Try it and see.
You crazies can't be trusted, you will use one when you get it. Stop talking to me. You can't justify strapping bombs on your children and sending them downtown to kill innocents on purpose. Nothing justifies that. Get off the earth plz
i knew those truths would make you crazy, spamming me with your crazy lying propoganda videos. Hahahaha,
Israel has nukes to annihilate Palestinians? Oh yea, they used one yesterday didn't they? no they didn't you crazy idiot. They put up with your insane crazy friends, lobbing unguided missles everyday and they do nothing because all they want is peace.
You won't see the truth because your so evil your head spins 360 degrees.
go ahead and keep spamming me, I am not affected by your craziness
"is that why your peaceful (war-mongering) kinds strap bombs in predator drones and kill innocent civilians".
no, the innocents in that respect die because your messed up crazy idiot evil scum chicken pig smelling friends hide behind women and children like the swine they are.
The predators have guided weapons with over 90% accuracy and they will be coming for you in your pig slop of a cave you hide in. It is a shame you have to hide behind innocent people and slow up the process
I want my democracy back, Obama. Corporations are given a disproportionate representation and we the people need to be heard. I am not going to be abused by health insurance cronies anymore!!!!
How come you call Anders Fogh Rasmussen, former President of Denmark he is not a former President of Denmark he is a former Primeminster there is a diffenters..
Any talk about success in Afghanistan needs to include Pakistan at the table. Iran will not do anything, they are like the bully at school who is tough at school but has a horrible homelife. When you find out where they live you will find a poor, corrupt and crumubling infrastructure that could not possibly support a war with the United States, Israel, or any other country for that matter.
This effort will only succeed by having the Afghan people lead in their own country.
The countries who are supporting Afghanistan with troops and monies must hold their own contractors and the Afghan government accountable. One of the ways to hold individuals/organization accountable is demanding transparency in the process of of decision making and spending of allocated funds.
Without this bare minimum requirement by the countries involved, they would be better off leaving Afghanistan.
We need to finish what we started in afghanistan.The insurgents are not unlimited and they are poorly equiped.Plus we have alot of the local militias on our side there.We can win we just have to be willing to do what we have to.
Finally understanding, They are not unlimited, If America can't beat them then are we truly Americans? I am tired of whiny wimps who are like unsuspecting sheep and just want the shepard to give them all they need and ignore it when the wolf takes what he will.
"Take care of us please, coz we can't take care of ourselves please Barrack", They don't even see what babies they are.
We need to send a million men there and do our best to kill those fucks. Seriously, we're wasting our time, send more men, why lose lives for no reason?
If you send more men there that is exactly what will happen. More dead soldiers.
What we need to do. Is get out of their. Or at least not send any more Americans troops but send NATO troops. I have no problems seeing 500000 more NATO troops.
except you forgot the ones Iran gives to their surrogate armies, hezbollah, hamas, taliban, alqueda. Those nukes come to America, New York gets one, Chicago, LA, Atlanta, where? I think phoenix, because they smuggle it from mexice and they can't wait to ignite it so they do it in Phoenix.
Then Obama blames it on Bush and all the sheep believe him.
Thats absurd Obama never blamed bush for the situation in iran.Though bush certainly did nothing to help by fanning flames of hatred in the middle east by the way we conducted ourselves in his years.But do you honestly think israel will allow that facility to stand if negotiations fall through?Of course not, they'll drop some bunker busters on it.We won't have to worry about military action.
President Obama will not try and win by giving the General what he needs to WIN.
President Obama will pull the ground forces out of Afghanistan and use drones and surgical strikes and leak them to the news to show he is doing something.
He will leave the innocent citizens to the Taliban, all because there is no oil there.
If there was oil there, he would be sending all the troops the General asked for and more.
is bad because, by allowing the taliban to have safe haven in Afghanistan, means more innocents everywhere in the world are at risk. which is worse? soldiers, who's job it is? or unsuspecting people working in high rises thinking what they will do with their family when the work day is done?
So keep pressure on by overwhelming force, or go back to pre 911 and just wait for it?
There are boots on the ground in Afghanistan already, if the goal is to keep the Taliban from finding safety then isn't a Predator strike able to do that in many situations? They are relatively quiet and small and can strike quickly. Ground based troops tend to make a presence that can alert the Taliban.
So which is smarter? Having many soldiers crashing around Afghanistan where the Taliban can keep one step ahead, or destroying them at night with Drones that they can't even see?
that would be good, except we need to find them. The WIn, is no more taliban. we need counter insurgent strategy similar to in Iraq. If we go flying tomahawks and predators over afghanistan without troups in all cities winning the hearts and minds of the regular folk, we are then just seen as murderers striking from above.
you remember the Win in Iraq came after the surge and the counter insurgent strategy of winning hearts of the people.
predator strikes are good for Obama, he can "make points" with his flock. They will never Win the war because they just make the (innocent) people on the recieving end very angry and scared..
We've 'won' in Iraq? Really, you should let everyone know because I don't believe that is a commonly known fact.
There is only one solution to the conflict in Afghanistan: They Afghani people will have to learn how to hold a government that their people trust. That won't change no matter how many soldiers are in Afghanistan. Its not a problem fixed with more firepower, its a problem that is much deeper and something we have almost no control over.
ooh, I thought we were having an intelligent debate. Now I see you are selective in your news.
I would call an end to combat missions, an elected government, a 5000 a month troop pullout, Saddam and his son's dead, An economy that makes ours look 3rd world in it's growth, a complete and total victory. One of the best America has ever had, when it comes to lives lost, and length, and accomplishments. Go US
You must get your news from the varsity pompom news team. USA can do it in Afghanistan!
winning in Iraq is a very subjective idea. To me, even having a presence of more than one or two military bases means we haven't won. Their government is still growing (leaving opportunities for corruption) and its little more than a template. As far as their economy, growth isn't much of an indicator. Of course their growth is greater because they have room to grow. No country with more than $40K per capita GDP is going to have growth of more than 2%-3%.
So to you, we haven't won in Japan because we still have military bases there? Or Gerrmany? Or Bosnia? Or Kosovo? Or Panama? Or Greneda? I guess we better get busy and win these wars we still have a presence in their countries.
Of course after Hitler was beaten the government was shaky for years, We still had parades here for our victory.
Maybe that's the problem. This time because of the Left, There was no National Parades. there are many local ones still. Open up and see. It is wonderful
I don't mean just troops, but troops to keep the scholars and craftsmen safe to teach and show the better way. There is a better way. We have done it in Germany, Look at Japan. Open up and get behind the better peaceful world for all. It won't be done by appeasement. It will be won with the sword. We can do it as we have in the past. Yes, it is intrusive, but it leads to a better way.
In 15 years the afghani's can elect their own Barrack Obama and the world can love them! Our troops can do it!
True there is a lot of work to do in Afghanistan. The people need to learn trust. Same as they did/are learning in Iraq. It can be done. With a big enough American presence. They can expell the Taliban in an area, then stay, helping the people to thrive, and keeping the taliban from returning. It can be done, we are or were American's. Nothing was/is beyond us. I don't understand this pessimism and the it can't be done attitude.
War is horrendus, no doubt. Only understand, it is always with us.
its not that I don't think it can be done, but not just with more troops. Its a societal and cultural issue; Afghanis don't see government in the same way we do. We believe that a democratic republic is the best form of government. Its what I was told was the best way as long as I've been in school. But in Afghanistan it is almost a new concept, outside the bounds of their experience. More troops won't change that.
well, sorry, but in history that is the way. So your school is misleading you. Look back all through history cultures have been changed by troop occupation. Ghengis Khan, Alexander, All the vast culture changes in our world have been done by one presence influencing another. Without troops there to show the way, how will they know the path?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
probably? what the fuck is good about having less missile defenses near the worthless fag countries who are stupid enough to shoot off a nuke? I'd have a shit load of missile defense systems there, enough to line their entire fucking borders. You can't trust those sand eaters.
by doing this, obama is basically saying he's too pussy to stand up to the commie bastards that are an abomination to this world.
You're all talk. All the Republican Party does is screw everything up and then they leave a mess for someone else to clean up. They then resort to the same old tired name calling routine and phony tough talking nonsense. The worst attack on American in history came on their watch. Add in one of the worst recessions . Osama Bin Laden attacked us and the his Saddam and a 1.3 trillion dollar deficit.
Bill Clinton is the one that sucks. George Bush had to deal with the shit he started. Everyone blames Bush for the shit. Hopefully Obama will turn things around. We can't jump out of this immediately. It's gonna take some time.
That's our old prime Minister (:
TullerJackson 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why did the UN not help the people in palestine for 63 years. Ban Ki Mon and his crew in the UN are obliged to help the palestinian land because palestine is a member of the UN. Free the Palestine Land. UN G20 G8 !!!!
News107 7 months ago
FOGH IS THE MACHINE!!!
rytmen 10 months ago
What is the point of Nato now? THE COLD WAR IS OVER!!!!!
mizzoulibertarian 1 year ago
@mizzoulibertarian Protect as, Europe and USA, the Occidental culture from all the possibles enemies
666denish666 1 year ago
2 war happy shitheads
SuperAcab666 1 year ago
Slap nu af Fogh. Du ser så anspændt ud hele tiden. Du har jo vundet.
Vinbums 2 years ago
Vundet hvad? Han har fået et nyt job, men KRIGEN er ikke vundet endnu. Det går faktisk ad helvede til, så det er ikke så sært at han er nervøs over at have ansvaret for NATO.
nordicpatriot 2 years ago
former president of denmark???? don't push it, he was the prime minister.
louisedue 2 years ago
@louisedue Yes but in Denmark there is no president so he was the most poverfull man in Denmark.
Madshhdk 2 years ago 3
@Madshhdk POWERFULL
Madshhdk 2 years ago
@louisedue there isnt any difference u retard
rytmen 10 months ago
obama save israel, save our world! Israel is key to peace for hole world.
bass109 2 years ago
so disappointed at his idea not to send more troops in the field. could be he thinks himself "I DONT TRUST GENERALS ON THE FIELD! THEY ARE JUST WAR MONGERING ASSHOLES! I M THE ONE WHO KNOWS EVERYTHING AND CAN CONTROL EVERYTHING!"
IloveUSA1941 2 years ago
there leaning on the NWO of the "Allies" coming together as a whole and removing the ones who will stop this from happening... i dont think its bad i just like to know im aware of it
Apeman1991 2 years ago
WHEN WILL PEOPLE LEARN THAT POLOTICS AND RELIGION DON'T MIX. It's been how many centuries?
Voltegasproductions 2 years ago
20-0-5 may be the biggest ass I've heard in a long time. His/Her intolerance is so far down that there is no way to talk sense to them. At the end of the day I disagree with damn near all of ya..I'm an American Atheist...pretty marginalized in my own country. Why can't you religious morons realize the idea of God with any name is a joke. There is no "God", "Allah", " Yahwey" or whatever name you want to stick on a non-existent concept. Read a Real book instead of your silly religious texts.
mrfiggins 2 years ago
Then you're not the brightest of Atheists, since no one can either prove or disprove the existance of god. I'd recommend you to read some books of Dawkins, Harris or Hitchens. Though I am an atheist I would not recommend this approach you're making. You will not able to convince anyone by talking down to them. IMHO: youtube isn't really the place for such a discussion anyway. Peace!
Maarten26 2 years ago
it may be so, but have a notice. I debated 2 people on here very short debates, and both have fallen silent.
when a person says idrael has nukes to annilate palistinians, it is just so easily disproved by the fact that they haven't done it. undeniable.
I am not religious. I just learn the facts.
Facts are Americans love peace and are basic couch potatos, but they will go to all ends of the world to defends their freedom to sit on the couch!
Fact also, there is no oil in Afghanistan.
twentyoh5 2 years ago
But even though I am not religious I do believe in God.
Our basic rights were endowed on us by our creator.
So if we go by your belief system, then those rights don't exsist just as God doesn't.
pretty easy for them to be taken from you then, since there is no God, there are no God given rights.
Your view if dominate would subject us to all forms of slavery and depravation.
Thanks a lot
twentyoh5 2 years ago
Why Iran? ... Why not Iran?! from AntiDefm
/watch?v=7VegupvsG6Q
iknewitalready 2 years ago
Wonder what they plan to do about the Israeli nuclear arsenal problem...
newdebate 2 years ago
looks like they plan on forcing them to use it against Iran. Since they are letting Iran proceed with their nuke plan, The Israeli's will have no choice but to strike.
You will love that huh?
twentyoh5 2 years ago
"The Israeli's will have no choice but to strike."
Who will allow Israel to strike Iran?
iknewitalready 2 years ago
Who will allow?? Excuse me but your ignorance is showing.
You are either a super far left anti American, antisemite, anti whatever would help this world progress toward peace, or your one of the radical islamic terorists. Oh wait, that's the same thing.
I refuse to debate with your type, you just need to be canceled.
twentyoh5 2 years ago
"radical islamic terorists"
hahahaaa.... good one!
how about radical Christian terrorists who wages perpetual wars in Muslim countries, under the mask of Freedom, Democracy and Human Rights, to steal more middle eastern OIL!
you refuse to debate with me because you know that your argument are full of hypocrisy.
Israel can have nukes and not a threat to middle-east security or the world, but no other middle eastern country should have nukes.
Spare me of your hypocrisy!
iknewitalready 2 years ago
You are nothing but women and child murderers. You all should be expelled from the earth.
One arguement for the sake of making you even more crazy.
Israel has nukes because they are a peaceful people, if you crazies would leave them alone. Try it and see.
You crazies can't be trusted, you will use one when you get it. Stop talking to me. You can't justify strapping bombs on your children and sending them downtown to kill innocents on purpose. Nothing justifies that. Get off the earth plz
twentyoh5 2 years ago
"You can't justify strapping bombs on your children and sending them downtown to kill innocents on purpose." twentyoh5
Oh really.....is that why your peaceful (war-mongering) kinds strap bombs in predator drones and kill innocent civilians.
"Israel has nukes because they are a peaceful people" - twentyoh5
Israel has nuclear weapons to annihilate Palestinians and to steal Palestinian lands.
Palestinian Genocide in works, courtesy of Israeli Nukes.
Stop Warmongering and Get off the earth plz
iknewitalready 2 years ago
i knew those truths would make you crazy, spamming me with your crazy lying propoganda videos. Hahahaha,
Israel has nukes to annihilate Palestinians? Oh yea, they used one yesterday didn't they? no they didn't you crazy idiot. They put up with your insane crazy friends, lobbing unguided missles everyday and they do nothing because all they want is peace.
You won't see the truth because your so evil your head spins 360 degrees.
go ahead and keep spamming me, I am not affected by your craziness
twentyoh5 2 years ago
"is that why your peaceful (war-mongering) kinds strap bombs in predator drones and kill innocent civilians".
no, the innocents in that respect die because your messed up crazy idiot evil scum chicken pig smelling friends hide behind women and children like the swine they are.
The predators have guided weapons with over 90% accuracy and they will be coming for you in your pig slop of a cave you hide in. It is a shame you have to hide behind innocent people and slow up the process
twentyoh5 2 years ago
Comment removed
vdohwatcher 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Shove the 90% predator up your ASS sideways.....that will slow the process of your stupid evil warmongering.
vdohwatcher 2 years ago
Is congress actually going to declare war this time? ( with iran )
...or are you going to VIOLATE our constitution like the last 3 criminals?
END THE DAM WARS LIKE YOU SAID YOU WOULD
rungy07 2 years ago
Where is our public option? I will not be abused by health insurace companies any longer.
EcrossH 2 years ago
Its dead ;/ to many dems are going against it.Probably the ones who got insurance company contributions.
harkonnen554 2 years ago
I want my democracy back, Obama. Corporations are given a disproportionate representation and we the people need to be heard. I am not going to be abused by health insurance cronies anymore!!!!
EcrossH 2 years ago 3
How come you call Anders Fogh Rasmussen, former President of Denmark he is not a former President of Denmark he is a former Primeminster there is a diffenters..
g8etdane 2 years ago
Dear President Obama,
I FUCKING LOVE YOU!
asdfghjkl418 2 years ago
lets hope for good.
desiperdesi558 2 years ago
how, how HD is this vid...
machinenamon 2 years ago
Comment removed
FreshDebonair 2 years ago
Go to a place where the people speak english well..
ReitersOfTheStorm 2 years ago
just listen to msnbc and the other varsity pom pom news media's, you will be talking like them in no time!
twentyoh5 2 years ago
OBAMA is a genius...
fsrafols 2 years ago
I support Obama and respect him deeply. I think he's doing a good job but hope he will take a stronger stand against Iran.
daderone 2 years ago 2
Any talk about success in Afghanistan needs to include Pakistan at the table. Iran will not do anything, they are like the bully at school who is tough at school but has a horrible homelife. When you find out where they live you will find a poor, corrupt and crumubling infrastructure that could not possibly support a war with the United States, Israel, or any other country for that matter.
bacbecker 2 years ago
they'll do less in Iran if real sanctions are put in place now. I'm glad Obama has the balls to stand up for sanctions.
Iran has given Obama the middle finger and a clenched fist in response to his open hand.
daderone 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
barack obama will be the best president ever*******
AnthonyNews 2 years ago
This effort will only succeed by having the Afghan people lead in their own country.
The countries who are supporting Afghanistan with troops and monies must hold their own contractors and the Afghan government accountable. One of the ways to hold individuals/organization accountable is demanding transparency in the process of of decision making and spending of allocated funds.
Without this bare minimum requirement by the countries involved, they would be better off leaving Afghanistan.
inayet 2 years ago
We need to finish what we started in afghanistan.The insurgents are not unlimited and they are poorly equiped.Plus we have alot of the local militias on our side there.We can win we just have to be willing to do what we have to.
harkonnen554 2 years ago
Finally understanding, They are not unlimited, If America can't beat them then are we truly Americans? I am tired of whiny wimps who are like unsuspecting sheep and just want the shepard to give them all they need and ignore it when the wolf takes what he will.
"Take care of us please, coz we can't take care of ourselves please Barrack", They don't even see what babies they are.
twentyoh5 2 years ago
Comment removed
THEUTUBEHATER 2 years ago
We need to send a million men there and do our best to kill those fucks. Seriously, we're wasting our time, send more men, why lose lives for no reason?
smartwarlord 2 years ago
If you send more men there that is exactly what will happen. More dead soldiers.
What we need to do. Is get out of their. Or at least not send any more Americans troops but send NATO troops. I have no problems seeing 500000 more NATO troops.
THEUTUBEHATER 2 years ago
Iran is going to get a nuke and Obama is going to nothing about it. Good for them.
Then Iran can nuke there worst enemy Isreal and maybe started WW3 and we all can see the End Times.
Really that doesn't sound so good. But I know and everyone else knows Iran is going to get nukes and do this. Sorry Barry for the bad news.
THEUTUBEHATER 2 years ago
except you forgot the ones Iran gives to their surrogate armies, hezbollah, hamas, taliban, alqueda. Those nukes come to America, New York gets one, Chicago, LA, Atlanta, where? I think phoenix, because they smuggle it from mexice and they can't wait to ignite it so they do it in Phoenix.
Then Obama blames it on Bush and all the sheep believe him.
twentyoh5 2 years ago
Thats absurd Obama never blamed bush for the situation in iran.Though bush certainly did nothing to help by fanning flames of hatred in the middle east by the way we conducted ourselves in his years.But do you honestly think israel will allow that facility to stand if negotiations fall through?Of course not, they'll drop some bunker busters on it.We won't have to worry about military action.
harkonnen554 2 years ago
And it sounds to me your simply a sheep of a different flock.
harkonnen554 2 years ago
Fuck the war.
theendofconfusion 2 years ago
President Obama will not try and win by giving the General what he needs to WIN.
President Obama will pull the ground forces out of Afghanistan and use drones and surgical strikes and leak them to the news to show he is doing something.
He will leave the innocent citizens to the Taliban, all because there is no oil there.
If there was oil there, he would be sending all the troops the General asked for and more.
twentyoh5 2 years ago
and putting fewer soldiers at risk is bad because...?
elijahxcoldiron 2 years ago
is bad because, by allowing the taliban to have safe haven in Afghanistan, means more innocents everywhere in the world are at risk. which is worse? soldiers, who's job it is? or unsuspecting people working in high rises thinking what they will do with their family when the work day is done?
So keep pressure on by overwhelming force, or go back to pre 911 and just wait for it?
twentyoh5 2 years ago
There are boots on the ground in Afghanistan already, if the goal is to keep the Taliban from finding safety then isn't a Predator strike able to do that in many situations? They are relatively quiet and small and can strike quickly. Ground based troops tend to make a presence that can alert the Taliban.
So which is smarter? Having many soldiers crashing around Afghanistan where the Taliban can keep one step ahead, or destroying them at night with Drones that they can't even see?
elijahxcoldiron 2 years ago
that would be good, except we need to find them. The WIn, is no more taliban. we need counter insurgent strategy similar to in Iraq. If we go flying tomahawks and predators over afghanistan without troups in all cities winning the hearts and minds of the regular folk, we are then just seen as murderers striking from above.
you remember the Win in Iraq came after the surge and the counter insurgent strategy of winning hearts of the people.
They then kicked out alqeda themselves.
twentyoh5 2 years ago
predator strikes are good for Obama, he can "make points" with his flock. They will never Win the war because they just make the (innocent) people on the recieving end very angry and scared..
twentyoh5 2 years ago
We've 'won' in Iraq? Really, you should let everyone know because I don't believe that is a commonly known fact.
There is only one solution to the conflict in Afghanistan: They Afghani people will have to learn how to hold a government that their people trust. That won't change no matter how many soldiers are in Afghanistan. Its not a problem fixed with more firepower, its a problem that is much deeper and something we have almost no control over.
elijahxcoldiron 2 years ago
ooh, I thought we were having an intelligent debate. Now I see you are selective in your news.
I would call an end to combat missions, an elected government, a 5000 a month troop pullout, Saddam and his son's dead, An economy that makes ours look 3rd world in it's growth, a complete and total victory. One of the best America has ever had, when it comes to lives lost, and length, and accomplishments. Go US
You must get your news from the varsity pompom news team. USA can do it in Afghanistan!
twentyoh5 2 years ago
winning in Iraq is a very subjective idea. To me, even having a presence of more than one or two military bases means we haven't won. Their government is still growing (leaving opportunities for corruption) and its little more than a template. As far as their economy, growth isn't much of an indicator. Of course their growth is greater because they have room to grow. No country with more than $40K per capita GDP is going to have growth of more than 2%-3%.
elijahxcoldiron 2 years ago
So to you, we haven't won in Japan because we still have military bases there? Or Gerrmany? Or Bosnia? Or Kosovo? Or Panama? Or Greneda? I guess we better get busy and win these wars we still have a presence in their countries.
Of course after Hitler was beaten the government was shaky for years, We still had parades here for our victory.
Maybe that's the problem. This time because of the Left, There was no National Parades. there are many local ones still. Open up and see. It is wonderful
twentyoh5 2 years ago
I don't mean just troops, but troops to keep the scholars and craftsmen safe to teach and show the better way. There is a better way. We have done it in Germany, Look at Japan. Open up and get behind the better peaceful world for all. It won't be done by appeasement. It will be won with the sword. We can do it as we have in the past. Yes, it is intrusive, but it leads to a better way.
In 15 years the afghani's can elect their own Barrack Obama and the world can love them! Our troops can do it!
twentyoh5 2 years ago
True there is a lot of work to do in Afghanistan. The people need to learn trust. Same as they did/are learning in Iraq. It can be done. With a big enough American presence. They can expell the Taliban in an area, then stay, helping the people to thrive, and keeping the taliban from returning. It can be done, we are or were American's. Nothing was/is beyond us. I don't understand this pessimism and the it can't be done attitude.
War is horrendus, no doubt. Only understand, it is always with us.
twentyoh5 2 years ago
its not that I don't think it can be done, but not just with more troops. Its a societal and cultural issue; Afghanis don't see government in the same way we do. We believe that a democratic republic is the best form of government. Its what I was told was the best way as long as I've been in school. But in Afghanistan it is almost a new concept, outside the bounds of their experience. More troops won't change that.
elijahxcoldiron 2 years ago
well, sorry, but in history that is the way. So your school is misleading you. Look back all through history cultures have been changed by troop occupation. Ghengis Khan, Alexander, All the vast culture changes in our world have been done by one presence influencing another. Without troops there to show the way, how will they know the path?
twentyoh5 2 years ago
Comment removed
Voltegasproductions 2 years ago
A decent president. pulling the missile shield plans was *probably* a good idea..but we'll see
StLucas776 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
probably? what the fuck is good about having less missile defenses near the worthless fag countries who are stupid enough to shoot off a nuke? I'd have a shit load of missile defense systems there, enough to line their entire fucking borders. You can't trust those sand eaters.
by doing this, obama is basically saying he's too pussy to stand up to the commie bastards that are an abomination to this world.
oldspice2625 2 years ago
You're all talk. All the Republican Party does is screw everything up and then they leave a mess for someone else to clean up. They then resort to the same old tired name calling routine and phony tough talking nonsense. The worst attack on American in history came on their watch. Add in one of the worst recessions . Osama Bin Laden attacked us and the his Saddam and a 1.3 trillion dollar deficit.
stanjz 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Obama lol, could u give me some money from the US and A? Just a couple of million. Noone will notice.
patjoswe 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bill Clinton is the one that sucks. George Bush had to deal with the shit he started. Everyone blames Bush for the shit. Hopefully Obama will turn things around. We can't jump out of this immediately. It's gonna take some time.
pkcrossing89 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
barack obma will be the best president ever*******
AnthonyNews 2 years ago 4