To anyone whose saying an i5 rapes the FX, THINK AGAIN.
AMD updated the 8 core making it compatible with windows so now it supports games, apps, technically everything. Also, module splitting destroys hyper threading..
i5 2500K does not use Hyper Threading and stll beats the AMD FX "Bulldozer" in any games. There is a saying "You Got what You Paid For" Sorry but I'm not a fan of AMD. Ever since when I started using PC way back in the 80's I've been using Intel flatform. Intel 286, 386, 486, 586, then came Pentium I, 2, 3 and 4 and now Sandy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-E and the forthcoming Ivy Bridge. This Ivy Bridge Flatform is soon to be release but millions out there PC Enthusiasts and alike are already waiting.
@couer1911 Take one all core using and architecture orientated software and your lower brother of the 3960x will barely see the 8150's backlights.
You would be stunned knowing how many servers (hey, we do not only need gaming rigs - also servers to play on *lol* ) run with intel CPU's. Almost none of them ;)
The fact is: Most end-user software is build for Intel. Same with games for nVidia instead of ATI/AMD. Don't judge without knowing where both of them have their strength.
Does anybody out there right now using 8 applications(heavily threaded) such as photo editing softwares at the same time in one Computer? If the answer is no then, why in this world such as AMD manufatures such CPU's?
I'm not a fanboy for and or intel i jusr rathher pay less for a cpu and its just a computer it wont kill ur electrix bill if it so into green mode saving electricity buy a Intel Gaga
I dont know why is everyone so b*tching around about that...ok I admit that bulldozer isnt what should be and its fail and everything....ok intel IS better than amd and will be always, but the question is...why is amd not good enough for you? for most of people is enough to have amd in pc because they dont do enything special...even for gamers is enough amd....this cpu war is stupid...intel is for science and amd for people...get over it!
People just like to say "yeah I got an 8 core processor"... well I like to say "yeah I got a 4 core processor that beats your 8 core processor" The 2600k and even the 2500k i7 beats the bulldozer hands down for gaming. That is not to say this is a bad chip. It does excel for business apps like photoshop, video editing and rendering. AMD fanboys always talk price. What about the 100 watts higher the 8 core runs then the i7? Don't you pay your own electric bill?...lol
@themanofram Kinda right. I just tested it on a friends system, but you're stressing Java. We had MC running with 8 gigs allocated to Minecraft, and used about 10.000 tnt, and couldn't handle it. But the CPU was used for about 20%
Im building a system just like that but I have the AMD Fx 6100, XFX HD 6970, 16GB Vengance ram, H80 Cooler, 1000W PSU, 120 Agility SSD, and 2 TB HDD :)
@germas369 Im sure he gets all the parts from the company and they do there reviews and what not and maybe sell it as a "display" product in there stores
I read a lot of reviews about this new AMD CPU FX Bulldozer and they say it is not what users expected. It is being out performed by Intel i5 2500K which has only 4 cores.
@dakkeltibuto4466 In lightly threaded applications and 90% of the things the average user will do with their computer every day yes the i5 kills it. In some heavily threaded apps the FX performs better. But not an 8 core vs 4 core cpu kind of better. More like within a few seconds
@dakkeltibuto4466 AMD classify there modules as cores, there are two modules in each core, so basically its a quad core with 8 modules, AMD basically lied but in a smart way that they can lie if you get what I mean, theres an article in custom pc mag if you live in the UK
@emomotorgeek But they represent the real usable power really well. There's no need to make special editions of programs for that "weird core design".
@dakkeltibuto4466 um just in case u didnt know, intel uses hyper threading, which lets it double its cores and AMD doesnt use hyper threading. so to make up for hyper threading, AMD tries to put as many cores as possible, such as the opteron 16 core cpu
@BulletProofGeek i5 2500K does not use Hyper Threading and stll beats the AMD FX "Bulldozer" in any games. There is a saying "You Got what You Paid For" Sorry but I'm not a fan of AMD. Ever since when I started using PC way back in the 80's I've been using Intel flatform. Intel 286, 386, 486, 586, then came Pentium I, 2, 3 and 4 and the rest is history.
@VuDu4000 Yeah! sort off but. I mean I'm not a fan of AMD processors. Actually right now I will be obliges to buy an AMD GPU because my Motherboard doesn't support SLI, it only supports CrossfireX. And before I forget, These GPU's are originally from ATI Radeon, not from AMD.
@VuDu4000 The thing is: You guys can't admit that Intel is still more advance in terms of CPU manufacturing than AMD, read cutomer's reviews and you will find out the truth.
@dakkeltibuto4466 Why are you saying that to me? I know Intel is better than AMD at making best CPU's, I have an i5 @ 4.5ghz for gaming and it's doing good. But the thing is, even if Intel makes the better CPU's, AMD is not a bad processor, it does good in gaming as well.
@dakkeltibuto4466 CAN U PLEASE CALM DOWN!!!!??? ok so i see where u mis-understood,, the i3 does have hyperthreading but it doesnt have turbo boost, only i7 has that.. thats where u got confused
@BulletProofGeek So now u r telling me I misunderstand you? You didn't know what you're talking about. i3 got no turbo boost but it does hyper threading, i5 got no hyper threading but it has turbo boost. i7 got turbo boost and hyperthreading. I am not confused because I read the facts first before I say something in this public forum. The lesson is: do your reseach and read the facts before you write your reply so that you wouldn't be so shamefull of yourself.
@BulletProofGeek If you want to learn more about Computer technology, be a member of Tom's Hardware. There you will learn the does and don'ts , facts and myth about Computing Industry and Electronics and Communications Technology.
@dakkeltibuto4466 FX Series's Is Meant To Be The Bulldozers Server Series, They'll Build Some New Phenom Chips Built Around The Bulldozers Architecture, So When It's Made For A Server It Should Be Put Up Against A Xeon. Jackass.
@ferretco So if it's made for server system, Why are they advertising it for use as a desktop or a gaming system? I therefore conclude that this is a false advertising and to mislead the Consumers! PEA HEAD!!!!!!!!!
@dakkeltibuto4466 Thats because windows 7 can't take advantage of the Bulldozer and they were using the wrong chips. They re did benchmarks it it was placed around the same as a 2600k
@dakkeltibuto4466 Of course it's outperformed by a 4 core processor because there are no applications that use 8 cores. Anyways, Intel is better than AMD in all possible ways, hands down. I'm not trying to be an Intel fanboy, but AMD issues and indifference brought them to their own shit.
@dakkeltibuto4466 Actually, it is much more complicated than that. In my job I have to do with both Intel AND AMD and I cannot say I prefer one of them... When we build a server or a CAD/modelling/texturing/art - orientated computer, we always recommend and use AMD. For advanced videoediting, gaming rigs and that stuff we use Intel. The 2500k is faster in games, yes. But the AMD will lead in all core using softwares, which are rare for 8 of 'em atm.
@dakkeltibuto4466 For all the people who misunderstood.. fx 8 core does rape i5 2500k but intel uses hyper threading and hyperthreading doubles its cores, thats why intel is so hard to overclock.. but amd uses full cores so amd needs to provide more cores, so the 2500k should have more power but amd fx 8150 actually beats the 2500k quad core at both, performance and price THUMBS UP SO ALL CAN SEE!!!
@BulletProofGeek FYI! i5 2500K doesn't have hyper threading, only i7 2600K and i7 2700K uses hyper threading, Read the Intel's Spec's about these 3 outstanding CPU and you will learn the truth, because truth will set you free. Go to Intel website right now. i5 2500K is not hard to oveclock, overclocking depends on many factors like: MOBO, the chipset, core temps and the voltage or vCore and most of all the CPU cooler(air/liquid). To sum it up, where did you get those wrong info?
@dakkeltibuto4466 lol doesnt it concern u how a intel core i3 which is dual core is really close to a amd fx 4100 which is a quad core? ITS CALLED HYPERTHREADING!! i3 i5 i7 ALL USE IT stupid now stop arguing and back to 2nd grade
@BulletProofGeek The thing is you can't accept the truth, as I told you before go to Intel's Website and find out the truth, because the truth will set you free. DUMBASS STUPID GEEK!
@dakkeltibuto4466 normally i am a AMD fan but that´s exactly the reason why i have bought a i5 2500k for my new gaming rig, even if it does cost me a bit more! but to be fair you have to say that there is nut much programs/games out there, which could really use the advantage of an 8-core!
@ndogg360 Because corsair make brilliant electronics i use their ram and psu but seriously that case is not even a full tower my previous cases are Thermaltake Armour+ Haf 932 this corsair case im betting would cost a premium and you can't even fit tripple gfx.
@GuernB2 threads are used to perform multiple processes in 1 proces. But they are still only handled at 1 of the 4 cores for the i7. So 8 threads would just que up 2 threads at 1 core. Simply explained that is..
Were the amd has 8 cores, which would perform 1 proces from a bigger proces for example at 1 core.
@GuernB2 i7 2600k has 4 logical cores, and 4 virtual threads. So one thread for each core, creating the illusion of an 8-core CPU. Although windows reads it as 8 cores, it is actually a quad core with 4 additional threads. Its a great design, and is WAY more efficient than AMD's ridiculous multicore CPU's. Intels use less power, perform better in multi-threaded applications, and don't burn up and die after a year.
@thewizard99 They hold the highest frequency attained by a CPU, but that was only with 2 cores enabled. So no, even a 1100t or 2500k @ stock would have performed better in games than a 8150 @ 8.5GHz...
I've got 2 or 3 times weaker computer that this one and running on this same Corsair memory kit:D I'm not to mention the fact, that because of My AMD Athlon II X2 CPU i can use them only at 1066Mhz. - LOL hahaha
this is a good gaming pick for the price, but in most apps its still falling behind the latest i7 qual or even the i5 qual in some cases, despite the intel ones run with slower clock and run slower in a few games. but if you overclock both the i7 qual and fx 8cores to 5.2 ghz, there's a chance that the intel can prove to be even further in performance. hence i don't think amd has done enough, but still it's nice to see it goes for higher core/memory support and easy overclocking.
ffs this video wont load correctly its slow unbearable to watch -___-
007foppe 1 hour ago
I want that case!
masterchief3k 16 hours ago
so tell me... what is your average fps on minecraft? 1,000 2,000 or MABY 10,000? yeah i get all of those just maby with the three 0's at the end gone
MrCrazyGrampa 1 day ago
@MrCrazyGrampa i think 100.000 FPS easy :D
AlvedaMusic 2 hours ago
AMDの8コアがいいと いってる見たいだが 実際はどうなのかわからん
re26ee 2 days ago
I have the Intel version of this PC running dual gtx 580's and AX1200.
jewie27 2 days ago
fuck c:
theligitdisney 2 days ago
you dont know how much id love to have your job.
IamDuhmb 2 days ago
FAILDOZER
pabstd 3 days ago
it could've been great, but why the horrible case?
sirchrisbuckley 3 days ago
What's "push-pull configuration?" I've never heard of it.
Jeffmili00 4 days ago
@Jeffmili00 2 fans pulling air, 2 other fans pulling air
denisaaj 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jeffmili00 2 fans pulling air, 2 other fans pulling air
MartinToniste 3 days ago
Comment removed
scott93257 4 days ago
wow nice amd
vmn1451 5 days ago
what about overclocking?=
davidvu396 5 days ago
@davidvu396 thats the whole point of the fx series
DarkEmoE 2 days ago
I have boxes! xD
Jesseowneh 5 days ago 3
SELL ME THIS >:O
FindingLuis 5 days ago
Uses VGA kabel on HD6970 -.-'
xGerjann 6 days ago 3
How can I buy that exact system?
bigchamp18 1 week ago in playlist Liked videos
@bigchamp18 I dont think you can brand new. You would have to ask around to get one second hand.
ThEc00lEr 1 week ago
@ThEc00lEr Damn it. I want that exact system. All those parts and what not. That whole set up. Lol
bigchamp18 6 days ago
what type of monitor is that? also what is a good overclock of the 8150 on a crossfire v
SplintahWTF 1 week ago
what cold cathodes are you using linus?
Filoz64 1 week ago 19
@Filoz64 lol its soo bright
BulletProofGeek 1 week ago
@Filoz64 Use led stripes :p
NotBackinDown04 6 days ago
To anyone whose saying an i5 rapes the FX, THINK AGAIN.
AMD updated the 8 core making it compatible with windows so now it supports games, apps, technically everything. Also, module splitting destroys hyper threading..
ElementalMonster54 1 week ago
Special Edition!!! Woooooooow Cum in my pants
What!!! Turbo?? did you say TURBO??? squirt in my pants
MrLeelee1980 1 week ago
Bulldozer sounds so freaking badass :)
timpos546 1 week ago
what case are you using?
NiPGamingInc 1 week ago
@NiPGamingInc i believe this case is the Corsair Obsidian 650D
lpjz290 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i5 2500K does not use Hyper Threading and stll beats the AMD FX "Bulldozer" in any games. There is a saying "You Got what You Paid For" Sorry but I'm not a fan of AMD. Ever since when I started using PC way back in the 80's I've been using Intel flatform. Intel 286, 386, 486, 586, then came Pentium I, 2, 3 and 4 and now Sandy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-E and the forthcoming Ivy Bridge. This Ivy Bridge Flatform is soon to be release but millions out there PC Enthusiasts and alike are already waiting.
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
My 3930k would wipe the floor with this AMD shit
couer1911 1 week ago
@couer1911 Take one all core using and architecture orientated software and your lower brother of the 3960x will barely see the 8150's backlights.
You would be stunned knowing how many servers (hey, we do not only need gaming rigs - also servers to play on *lol* ) run with intel CPU's. Almost none of them ;)
The fact is: Most end-user software is build for Intel. Same with games for nVidia instead of ATI/AMD. Don't judge without knowing where both of them have their strength.
8Denkmeister8 1 week ago
@couer1911 who cares? Lol
Kryonproductions 1 week ago
@Kryonproductions If you're not on my social class level then please don't reply. You're not a gentleman.
couer1911 1 week ago
try play shogun 2 total war, good fight amd fx...
TheStockzzz 1 week ago
are the two top fans exhausting?
Filoz64 1 week ago
Does anybody out there right now using 8 applications(heavily threaded) such as photo editing softwares at the same time in one Computer? If the answer is no then, why in this world such as AMD manufatures such CPU's?
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
Fuck I hate this dudes voice! Sounds like the fuckin fag boy FRED!!
rycaca 1 week ago
@rycaca don't watch the video?
Kryonproductions 1 week ago
I'm not a fanboy for and or intel i jusr rathher pay less for a cpu and its just a computer it wont kill ur electrix bill if it so into green mode saving electricity buy a Intel Gaga
Wesdamac8 1 week ago
I dont know why is everyone so b*tching around about that...ok I admit that bulldozer isnt what should be and its fail and everything....ok intel IS better than amd and will be always, but the question is...why is amd not good enough for you? for most of people is enough to have amd in pc because they dont do enything special...even for gamers is enough amd....this cpu war is stupid...intel is for science and amd for people...get over it!
Crystal94SK 1 week ago
i have 2500k n my bro have fx 8150.. but i dunno why i like to use his fx pc more than my 2500k.. :(
silversRAY 1 week ago
People just like to say "yeah I got an 8 core processor"... well I like to say "yeah I got a 4 core processor that beats your 8 core processor" The 2600k and even the 2500k i7 beats the bulldozer hands down for gaming. That is not to say this is a bad chip. It does excel for business apps like photoshop, video editing and rendering. AMD fanboys always talk price. What about the 100 watts higher the 8 core runs then the i7? Don't you pay your own electric bill?...lol
oldsk8r 1 week ago
LOYALTY + ROYALTY AMD IS SLOWER THAN INTEL BUT BETTER AT STAYING AT A LOWER PRICE AND BANGIN OUT 8 CORES.
or you can call it 4 CORES with 2 Threads per core. 8-CORE intel was slower on releasing in the number of cores.
but, more than likely when intel does release 8-cores it blow everyone away 4 SURE
I LOVE AMD BETTER THAN INTEL
Wesdamac8 1 week ago
@Wesdamac8 u r stupid
BigWillyam 1 week ago
How to stress your computer=Minecraft+variable amounts of TNT.
themanofram 1 week ago 109
@themanofram Kinda right. I just tested it on a friends system, but you're stressing Java. We had MC running with 8 gigs allocated to Minecraft, and used about 10.000 tnt, and couldn't handle it. But the CPU was used for about 20%
TheGrilledPineapple 1 week ago
@themanofram You're not stressing your comp by doing that. Minecraft it self is just too shitty to handle all the explotions.
EnhancedExhaust 1 week ago
@themanofram Or the nuke mod :p
pkowner484 5 days ago
@pkowner484 Nuke x10 >:D
itsCHIExD 4 days ago
@themanofram my computer crashed when i was doing just that...
MrVinney96 1 day ago
jealousy!!!!!
cameb98 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you also need to Buy a Water Pump or Just install the H100 and The Radiator?
fshlps 1 week ago
clean and sleek setup there, looks very nice!
razorbackblood06 1 week ago
Is the case modded or whats the name of this beauty? :)
zMulletin 2 weeks ago
@zMulletin It's a Corsair obsidian 650d which has been painted red. :)
xG4m3rJ4m3z 1 week ago
@xG4m3rJ4m3z thanks alot :D
zMulletin 1 week ago
Im building a system just like that but I have the AMD Fx 6100, XFX HD 6970, 16GB Vengance ram, H80 Cooler, 1000W PSU, 120 Agility SSD, and 2 TB HDD :)
eXBouncers 2 weeks ago
@eXBouncers too bad AMD bulldozer, and pretty much all AMD cpus suck
TCW97 1 week ago
@TCW97 Lol, shows what you know.
michaelhpedersen 1 week ago
That case looks SEXY! Please sell :D
TheHeew 2 weeks ago
Can we buy the painted case separately?
FLASHGABExMEDIAx 2 weeks ago
case?! its soo cool
BulletProofGeek 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
" Today on the Crazy Russians' NCIX PC lab, I have BOXES!!!" lol
BulletProofGeek 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
BulletProofGeek 2 weeks ago
i have see red and green paint. Why not make a blue paint on 650d?
manssupar 2 weeks ago
im crazy mexican.
halo56822 2 weeks ago
Man you are crazy i am curious how much does this sistem costs..
duzi17 2 weeks ago
Crazy Russian?
TheOfficialComokanu 2 weeks ago
Y U BE SO RICH?!
germas369 2 weeks ago
@germas369 NCIX is a company so he technically get all the parts free
RCLB2455 2 weeks ago
@RCLB2455 and keep it or just for the review purposes?
germas369 2 weeks ago
@germas369 Im sure he gets all the parts from the company and they do there reviews and what not and maybe sell it as a "display" product in there stores
RCLB2455 2 weeks ago
screw this shit, phenom ii x4/x6 rapes shitdozer
niteterror2k7 2 weeks ago
@niteterror2k7 lol shitdozer put amd on debt... intel is on top
gaminglaps 1 week ago
I read a lot of reviews about this new AMD CPU FX Bulldozer and they say it is not what users expected. It is being out performed by Intel i5 2500K which has only 4 cores.
dakkeltibuto4466 2 weeks ago 40
@dakkeltibuto4466 In lightly threaded applications and 90% of the things the average user will do with their computer every day yes the i5 kills it. In some heavily threaded apps the FX performs better. But not an 8 core vs 4 core cpu kind of better. More like within a few seconds
lamiac2411 2 weeks ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 AMD classify there modules as cores, there are two modules in each core, so basically its a quad core with 8 modules, AMD basically lied but in a smart way that they can lie if you get what I mean, theres an article in custom pc mag if you live in the UK
TheEliteFrags 2 weeks ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 Yeah thats true,BUT there will be a 2nd edition of Bulldozers...
viktoytube 2 weeks ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 most of those reviews use benchmarks that don't support using 8 cores/the weird core design Bulldozer uses.
emomotorgeek 2 weeks ago
@emomotorgeek But they represent the real usable power really well. There's no need to make special editions of programs for that "weird core design".
JARMOPOWER 2 weeks ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 um just in case u didnt know, intel uses hyper threading, which lets it double its cores and AMD doesnt use hyper threading. so to make up for hyper threading, AMD tries to put as many cores as possible, such as the opteron 16 core cpu
BulletProofGeek 2 weeks ago
@BulletProofGeek i5 2500K does not use Hyper Threading and stll beats the AMD FX "Bulldozer" in any games. There is a saying "You Got what You Paid For" Sorry but I'm not a fan of AMD. Ever since when I started using PC way back in the 80's I've been using Intel flatform. Intel 286, 386, 486, 586, then came Pentium I, 2, 3 and 4 and the rest is history.
dakkeltibuto4466 2 weeks ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 You are not a fan of AMD you say but you still use AMD graphics card? So a little fan you are afterall.
VuDu4000 2 weeks ago
@VuDu4000 Yeah! sort off but. I mean I'm not a fan of AMD processors. Actually right now I will be obliges to buy an AMD GPU because my Motherboard doesn't support SLI, it only supports CrossfireX. And before I forget, These GPU's are originally from ATI Radeon, not from AMD.
dakkeltibuto4466 2 weeks ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 AMD has owned Radeon since 2006 if I remember correctly, there is no more ATI cards, so no, the Radeon GPU's is AMD Radeon.
VuDu4000 1 week ago
@VuDu4000 The thing is: You guys can't admit that Intel is still more advance in terms of CPU manufacturing than AMD, read cutomer's reviews and you will find out the truth.
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 Why are you saying that to me? I know Intel is better than AMD at making best CPU's, I have an i5 @ 4.5ghz for gaming and it's doing good. But the thing is, even if Intel makes the better CPU's, AMD is not a bad processor, it does good in gaming as well.
VuDu4000 1 week ago
@VuDu4000 So we're good! I used i5 2500K also and I overclocked it at 4.7 GHZ 1.35 V Vcore.
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@VuDu4000 So we're good! I used i5 2500K also and I overclocked it at 4.7 GHZ 1.35 V Vcore.
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 CAN U PLEASE CALM DOWN!!!!??? ok so i see where u mis-understood,, the i3 does have hyperthreading but it doesnt have turbo boost, only i7 has that.. thats where u got confused
BulletProofGeek 1 week ago
@BulletProofGeek So now u r telling me I misunderstand you? You didn't know what you're talking about. i3 got no turbo boost but it does hyper threading, i5 got no hyper threading but it has turbo boost. i7 got turbo boost and hyperthreading. I am not confused because I read the facts first before I say something in this public forum. The lesson is: do your reseach and read the facts before you write your reply so that you wouldn't be so shamefull of yourself.
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
@BulletProofGeek If you want to learn more about Computer technology, be a member of Tom's Hardware. There you will learn the does and don'ts , facts and myth about Computing Industry and Electronics and Communications Technology.
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 LOL we all know ur a member or toms hardware no need to express that.. its ok
BulletProofGeek 1 week ago
@BulletProofGeek i5 has it too.
lolwut1337n355 2 days ago
@lolwut1337n355 i5 has small cache.
AlvedaMusic 2 hours ago
@AlvedaMusic 6mb vs 8mb? Seriously, that gives the i7 like a 2% advantage over the i5 even with hyperthreading.
lolwut1337n355 49 minutes ago
@BulletProofGeek AMD(Advance Micro Device) in reality they are not advancing as Intel, AMD is way behind Intel.
dakkeltibuto4466 2 weeks ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 intel fangirl troll.
michaelhpedersen 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 FX Series's Is Meant To Be The Bulldozers Server Series, They'll Build Some New Phenom Chips Built Around The Bulldozers Architecture, So When It's Made For A Server It Should Be Put Up Against A Xeon. Jackass.
ferretco 1 week ago
@ferretco So if it's made for server system, Why are they advertising it for use as a desktop or a gaming system? I therefore conclude that this is a false advertising and to mislead the Consumers! PEA HEAD!!!!!!!!!
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 well nothing actually uses 8 cores... maybe servers.
RalphCQ 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 Since the i5 750 is 5% slower than the 2500k in Clock per Clock, th Bulldozer even loses for the i5 750. Shame.
TheRodrigogames 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 Thats because windows 7 can't take advantage of the Bulldozer and they were using the wrong chips. They re did benchmarks it it was placed around the same as a 2600k
MW2watchyourback09 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 Of course it's outperformed by a 4 core processor because there are no applications that use 8 cores. Anyways, Intel is better than AMD in all possible ways, hands down. I'm not trying to be an Intel fanboy, but AMD issues and indifference brought them to their own shit.
reichstag10 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 Actually, it is much more complicated than that. In my job I have to do with both Intel AND AMD and I cannot say I prefer one of them... When we build a server or a CAD/modelling/texturing/art - orientated computer, we always recommend and use AMD. For advanced videoediting, gaming rigs and that stuff we use Intel. The 2500k is faster in games, yes. But the AMD will lead in all core using softwares, which are rare for 8 of 'em atm.
8Denkmeister8 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 For all the people who misunderstood.. fx 8 core does rape i5 2500k but intel uses hyper threading and hyperthreading doubles its cores, thats why intel is so hard to overclock.. but amd uses full cores so amd needs to provide more cores, so the 2500k should have more power but amd fx 8150 actually beats the 2500k quad core at both, performance and price THUMBS UP SO ALL CAN SEE!!!
BulletProofGeek 1 week ago
@BulletProofGeek FYI! i5 2500K doesn't have hyper threading, only i7 2600K and i7 2700K uses hyper threading, Read the Intel's Spec's about these 3 outstanding CPU and you will learn the truth, because truth will set you free. Go to Intel website right now. i5 2500K is not hard to oveclock, overclocking depends on many factors like: MOBO, the chipset, core temps and the voltage or vCore and most of all the CPU cooler(air/liquid). To sum it up, where did you get those wrong info?
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 are u challenging a geek? all i3, i5 and i7's use hyperthreading
Go to passmark and compare w/e u like,, ur completely wrong in all ways
BulletProofGeek 1 week ago
@BulletProofGeek You don't get it, i3, i7 use hyper threading. i5 2500K does not use hyper threading.
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
@BulletProofGeek Yeah! Maybe you are still a kid or not been born yet, I am already using a PC. Read first the facts before you write anything here.
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 lol doesnt it concern u how a intel core i3 which is dual core is really close to a amd fx 4100 which is a quad core? ITS CALLED HYPERTHREADING!! i3 i5 i7 ALL USE IT stupid now stop arguing and back to 2nd grade
BulletProofGeek 1 week ago
@BulletProofGeek The thing is you can't accept the truth, as I told you before go to Intel's Website and find out the truth, because the truth will set you free. DUMBASS STUPID GEEK!
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
@BulletProofGeek ALL I KNOW IS YOU ARE A 1ST GRADER, BECAUSE 2ND GRADER IS BETTER THAN IST GRADER. ARE YOU "IDIOT"CATED OR EDUCATED?
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
@dakkeltibuto4466 normally i am a AMD fan but that´s exactly the reason why i have bought a i5 2500k for my new gaming rig, even if it does cost me a bit more! but to be fair you have to say that there is nut much programs/games out there, which could really use the advantage of an 8-core!
BioMoneculaR 1 week ago
@BioMoneculaR amd fx 8150 cost less than a i5 2500k and has more power
BulletProofGeek 1 week ago
@BulletProofGeek I don't know where you getting your info?
Micro Center Price: i5 2500K is $179.99, FX 8150 is $259.99
Newegg Price: i5 2500K is $224.99, FX 8150 is $249.99
Go to their Websites to see the real truth.
dakkeltibuto4466 1 week ago
If only I could have this.
TheHobomanda 2 weeks ago
Sexy red and black.
SATANECRONOMICUS 2 weeks ago
I want that fucking system. <3
flakey94 2 weeks ago
Beautiful system
XxNevaLuvAgainxX 2 weeks ago
ok, you i am going to inbox you my address so you can send this to me ok?
kickASSstudioz 2 weeks ago
What fucking rubbish case use a coolermaster 932.
Str8trips 2 weeks ago
@Str8trips
Why are you calling the Corsair 650D a rubbish case?
ndogg360 2 weeks ago
@ndogg360 Because corsair make brilliant electronics i use their ram and psu but seriously that case is not even a full tower my previous cases are Thermaltake Armour+ Haf 932 this corsair case im betting would cost a premium and you can't even fit tripple gfx.
Str8trips 2 weeks ago
That case...i want it :/
ChikonNuggetz 2 weeks ago
Look at that Shine! >.< It's Cute
AnimeOtakuMade 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
nerbne 2 weeks ago
Link for CPU Fan?
tanjcal 2 weeks ago
@tanjcal cpu fan ? more like CPU COOLER
aeroaa2 2 weeks ago
what the fuck did he just ay
88stiky 2 weeks ago
i have EXACTLY the same Config. Love it! (:
TheDisultory 2 weeks ago
@TheDisultory you are too poor for this >.>
romario50001 2 weeks ago
the components are no longer inside because they are in the system... you can't take another one from the stocks supply?
goodboysfollowrules1 2 weeks ago
yay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i have the new fx cores but i have the bottom of th line one D: so mine is rubbish compared to this
mylaptopdiednooo 2 weeks ago
I have an i7920 and an 8120 and AMD comes up trumps :£ seriously underrated cpu
halibleach 3 weeks ago
Is this any more of an 8 core than the i7 2600k?
I know the fx is not 8 full cores, and the i7 has 8 threads
Whats the difference?
GuernB2 3 weeks ago
@GuernB2 The i7 is four cores. With the hyper threading technology it makes a virtual core in each of the cores.
wigg1987 2 weeks ago
@GuernB2 threads are used to perform multiple processes in 1 proces. But they are still only handled at 1 of the 4 cores for the i7. So 8 threads would just que up 2 threads at 1 core. Simply explained that is..
Were the amd has 8 cores, which would perform 1 proces from a bigger proces for example at 1 core.
TristanGoesYT 2 weeks ago
@GuernB2 i7 2600k has 4 logical cores, and 4 virtual threads. So one thread for each core, creating the illusion of an 8-core CPU. Although windows reads it as 8 cores, it is actually a quad core with 4 additional threads. Its a great design, and is WAY more efficient than AMD's ridiculous multicore CPU's. Intels use less power, perform better in multi-threaded applications, and don't burn up and die after a year.
RSSsailing 2 weeks ago
love that case
vizardstorm 3 weeks ago
MOTHER OF GOD
kshitijkumar89 3 weeks ago 40
The pc looks like a disco inside :)
mas90009 3 weeks ago
AMD is cheap but uses so much energy. You better can buy an i7 3960x. (World's fastest processor)
mas90009 3 weeks ago
@mas90009 World Fastest? Dude, AMD holds that record. Go Google it.
thewizard99 3 weeks ago
@thewizard99 They hold the highest frequency attained by a CPU, but that was only with 2 cores enabled. So no, even a 1100t or 2500k @ stock would have performed better in games than a 8150 @ 8.5GHz...
Orexll 3 weeks ago
@thewizard99 Intel i7 3960x
mas90009 3 weeks ago
@mas90009 you tu .be/UKN4VMOenNM ( remove underscore)
thewizard99 3 weeks ago
I just wish my fx-6100 could play some of my Steam games like Space Marine :(
MoobysnaxPercussion 3 weeks ago
and i thought i was the cool kid with a badass rig :(..
galeanoandres 3 weeks ago
been looking into that motherboard and the new 8 core 3.6ghz processor.. looks very bad ass.
tman1122334455 3 weeks ago
its almost the same computer I'm building.Im water cooling the CPU & GPU. Same board & CPU.Nice case. Great job on that project.
SLADEizGOD 3 weeks ago
I've got 2 or 3 times weaker computer that this one and running on this same Corsair memory kit:D I'm not to mention the fact, that because of My AMD Athlon II X2 CPU i can use them only at 1066Mhz. - LOL hahaha
OBcIO911 3 weeks ago
hey linux how much did this cost u looks great
123codfan 3 weeks ago
urg amd
Bendeco08 3 weeks ago
I have an AMD FX-6100, and i'm pretty suprized by the performance that the processor has!
CDA441 3 weeks ago
@CDA441 i was suprized too, because my old Phenom II X 945 with 3,6 GHz is faster than the FX 6100 with 4,2GHz :D
OmorMusica 3 weeks ago
@OmorMusica Bulldozer is designed for power not speed!
dragonmastershow 3 weeks ago
@dragonmastershow Haha, power, what a joke.
JARMOPOWER 3 weeks ago
whats the case?
jjchang310 3 weeks ago
@jjchang310 Corsair 650D painted red.
xPyroxx 3 weeks ago
price? wanne buy :D
splie25 3 weeks ago
I want this system :)
freak2221996 3 weeks ago
this is a good gaming pick for the price, but in most apps its still falling behind the latest i7 qual or even the i5 qual in some cases, despite the intel ones run with slower clock and run slower in a few games. but if you overclock both the i7 qual and fx 8cores to 5.2 ghz, there's a chance that the intel can prove to be even further in performance. hence i don't think amd has done enough, but still it's nice to see it goes for higher core/memory support and easy overclocking.
LHITShappy 3 weeks ago
how many jigaherts???
1koss2 3 weeks ago
@1koss2 I'm pretty sure that isn't how you spell Gigahertz, if that was what you were trying to spell.
I'm not sure, but if you really want to know, try messaging him directly, or just wait and see if he answers.
NerdyLikes 3 weeks ago
@NerdyLikes I know how to spell "Gigahertz" I just wanted to make fun of Linus)))
1koss2 3 weeks ago
@1koss2 Did you actually watch the whole thing?
Godslayerify 3 weeks ago
@Godslayerify yes, I did)
1koss2 3 weeks ago