Added: 4 years ago
From: theTRUTHgroup
Views: 17,370
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (115)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • is this for real? A christian group is using horrible outdated stereo types for laughs? how can they be this behind? I also like how they try to shit on science, but then have to admit it was scientists who discovered the error, not anyone else. so in other words...science works.

  • this is so funny! only white culture makes sense i agree.

  • That kind of racism belongs in a museum. A real musuem not a creationist shrine of stupidity.

  • To anyone confused, the Brontosaurus IS a real animal, and looks just like you think it does, however it's name is technically apatosaurus because that was the first name given to, but they found a baby and adult and named them different things.

  • That's interesting, it took science to correct an error made earlier, intentional or not. Explain how creationism would have corrected a similar mistake, what principal of creationism would help a paleontologist fix that?

  • This is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo racist.

  • 1877: Apotasaurus fossils discovered.

    1879: More complete species thought to be found, named Brontosaurus.

    1975: It is discovered that the head on the Brontosaurus specimen is actually that of a Camarasaurus on an Apotasaurus body. Scientific community erases the term Brontosaurus and publicises error.

    2007: Christians make a wholly unacceptable, extremely racist video lampooning a genuine and well-known mistake, long since corrected.

    2011: Atheist Scotsman finds video. Becomes EXTREMELY angry.

  • Brontosaurus name might be mistaken with Brachiosaurus now a day's... you two are Racist this was not funny. I understand the purpose of the video were of you two being deceiving but how about having class. it was 1879 they were just founding about new dinosaurs the mistake was fixed.

  • Unbelievable racism. Why not have a guy in blackface come in and tell them to stop talking jive. Jackasses.

  • oh god no..... that guy is meant to be blacked up.

    This is terrible.

  • Isnt this completely racist?

  • OMG Science is self correcting !?! I guess Evolution is going to be proved wrong then, soon. Crap is been 150 years ! soon...

  • Not only is this video racist, but its rather stupid. I like the complete lack of factual evidence or citation. Take this video down, you guys are making yourself look foolish.

  • HOW HAS THIS RACIST GARBAGE NOT BEEN FLAGGED???!!!

  • Nice. I like my religions with a side order of racism.

  • The real question is how did these guys get 1975 data into a video that was obviously made in the early 1950's before stereotypes like these were realized to be offensive?

  • BillyJoJimBob, you should go back to playing the banjo and fucking your sister and stuff. Because you obviously don't know anything about either science or humour or making videos. That was just retarded.. And can somebody remove these moronic videos, please? Damn, people can't just put brain-dead crap like that on YouTube!

  • Wow. At what point did you people decide this was a good idea?

  • Wow. Not only are you anti-science, you guys are total racists. I'm velly disappointed. And your point? Scientists made a mistake? Fine. Science is dynamic. They corrected it. It doesn't change the fact that life existed beyond 6,000 years ago. Meanwhile, the Bible, written by men and transformed over generations into hundreds of different versions, is the immutable truth? Check your facts.

  • i am highly offended 

  • 3:00 Did he say Godzilla?

    It sure looked like Godzilla flying around his head right before it.

  • @RudySpino Yup. :)

  • @theTRUTHgroup Lol, and its the real Godzilla not the 1998 Fraudzilla, Im a fan of Godzilla clearly lol ! ;) I love your videos and got the whole truth about dinosaurs DVD at church, are there any other Truth group episodes out yet?

  • Science corrects itself, when are they going to correct the bible?

  • In defense of these guys', I'm going to say that there were no racial undertones in this. I mean yeah, if I had to guess, these guys are supposed to be Chinese and an Indian, but so what? It's not like they're saying "All Americans are dumb" or anything REALLY racist like that. But then again, white people aren't a race. HAHAHA.

    If your womanly parts hurt, get some vagisil, and take a joke.

  • Strange. Most of the vidoe's on theTRUTHgroup's channel have to do with Christianity versus Athiesm. This has more to do with the Necromancy of dead racial stereotypes and Scientific topics.

    I think I like this video best of all.

  • This kind of nit picking is pathetic. It is like talking about all the attepted cures to polio that didn't work. It is like presuming since we have not cured cancer that the scientist don't know what the are doing and should stop. Using racial stereotypes to get your point across shows the depth of your ignorance." Buck tooth Asian man is so stupid" no one has pulled that joke since the 50s and there is a reason why, it is offensive. How you can be so stupid as to not see that?

  • There are ways to be funny without being disgustingly racist. There are ways to cleverly use aspects of racism to make people laugh and think.

    This film did neither. Sarah Silverman you ain't.

    Thanks for the apatosaurus tip, though. Not sure what it had to do with your bible, but I'll take it.

  • Comment removed

  • Great video thanks

  • In 1879 they made a mistake, wow, that changes everything, thanks dino experts.

  • Most of what we know about T-Rex came from one fossil, today they have 5 complete fossils of T-Rex. And more feathered dinosaurs too. The gaps are being filled.

  • I don't understand the point or logic here. Through racism you demonstrate that science made a mistake that it admitted, therefore the Bible is fact? Really I dont get it.

  • Exactly where does this video have anything to do with the Bible?

  • @theTRUTHgroup the two guys saying bible in the beginning

  • @christlover3000 They also said "book." So that proves they are librarians secretly trying to convert the world into the dark ages where the internet did not exist. Right?

  • @theTRUTHgroup

    "Exactly where does this video have anything to do with the Bible?"

    ...exactly. Does anything you say on this channel have anything to do with the Bible? Or are you just trying to fight the mass scientific conspiracy that says the earth (as we can study it) is Billions of years old?

    ...kind of reminds me of the scientific conspiracy that said the earth revolves around the sun and not the other way around....

  • you're religion isn't based on the bible? that wasn't the second word brought up about 20 seconds into the video?

  • What sort of religion are we teaching with this video?

  • oh with the silly games. you aren't good at them.

  • @theTRUTHgroup well since it's filmed at the creation museum, it's clear that you've got a pro-christian agenda. i'd guess this is an attempt to 'debunk' science, by illustrating there was one mistake (*gasp*) in identifying a dinosaur back in the 1800's. The fact that you did so using offensive racial stereotypes only serves to hurt your cause. You're idiots.

  • @theTRUTHgroup You are teaching the religion of anti-Science. OR  Are you teaching violence to get the twinkie you want to steal?

  • @theTRUTHgroup if you weren't trying to emphasize a religious belief then you did a poor job since bible was the 2nd word shown and it is clearly set up to be trying to debunk science. On a side note was the racism really necessary? I find it extremely offensive and very stupid. It also does nothing to support your argument (whatever it might actually be) and in fact only hurts it by making your group seem extremely narrow minded.

  • @theTRUTHgroup

    "What sort of religion are we teaching with this video?"

    Obviously the Religion Ken Ham told you to follow...or was this video not taken in his Bastard Temple of pseudo-scientific, bible-raping, religiousity????

    I hope you've been reading the comments on here from other believers. We are Justified in our anger and disappointment with this entire ministry. You can always delete this stuff for the Glory of God! :)

  • @theTRUTHgroup Okay lets say you are right okay? WTF Is your point? If ONE dinosaur isn't real all the other MILLIONS of bones are fake?

  • lol "per-haps twinkie (he he ho)" lol

  • how ever i have herd these things form other sources

  • I'm glad that you pointed out a virtue of science (revising or rejecting information when better information becomes available), but you didn't need to do it in a racially-offensive manner.

  • They did a Video of them as Rednecks so its ok...i mean its ok for Russel Peters or Bernie Mack or Carlos Mencia...but to them its Racially-Offensive? hhmmm..unfair.

  • Is the shamalama ding-dong song an american version of the walla-walla-bing-bang song or something? Also, very funny guys! :D

  • Actually that's allknown about the apatosaur and camarosaur... So what? It was corrected by scientists. So who does actually correct cristians? Maybe I just don't know of any but... well yeah, I don't know of any case a cristian correcting the errors of cristianity. So... enlighten me ;)

    Well the point of the first part: Scientists try to get the truth and make mistakes which they correct. Unlike religious people who make up things and balieve in it stubbornly.

  • Wow...

    you sound pretty hostile for a guy who just watched a video teaching people that the 'Brontosaurus' never really existed.

    Do you have deeply held religious beliefs about the 'Brontosaurus'?

    Or, are you just offended that we would have the audacity to teach such a thing?

    Relax.

    This video isn't attacking anything.

    We're just TEACHING the truth.

    Nobody is to blame here.

    We're just trying to inform the general public to quit using the word 'Brontosaurus'.

    Is that so wrong?

  • "you sound pretty hostile for a guy who just watched a video"

    ???

    Tell me, which part of my post was hostile? Well that's the biggest problem of write-chat, you actually don't see the person who's talking and don't know the persons... uhm... expression?

    Well but why did I wrote those things: Well you come in this video with an "idiot" who's representing the scientist. Like scientists don't know about brontosaur. so please, don't give me that teaching the truth thingie.

  • Obviously, they're BOTH scientists.

    It's a comedy gag.

    That's why one is the 'smart one' and the other is the 'not so smart side-kick'.

  • Its actually spelled Camarasaurus.

  • Thanks.

    But, if you read the description, you'll notice that we spelled it correctly.

    We only spelled it wrong in the video for the sake of the joke.

  • So, what you're saying is that science sometimes makes mistakes, but then automatically corrects them. *yawn*

  • Yeah, shame on science for being able to admit its mistakes and move on.

  • Isn't the intelligent design movement trying to get creationism viewed as a serious scientific alternative to evolution?

    I think you may have missed that mark a bit with this video.

  • This teaching has nothing to do with either Creationism OR evolution OR intelligent design.

    It's just a simple sketch about the Brontosaurus misunderstanding.

  • Haha I find it so pathetic that people will pick apart the way the message is delivered rather then pick apart the actual argument. So self righteous I would not apologize for that. Good Job Guys keep up the good work! I will defiantly recommend this to all that I know and use it as a resource for kids. (to notquitegobshite your remark about racism is absolutely rediculas go watch a video about mud coming to life).

  • As I understand it, the "argument" here is that scientists made a mistake in an era when paleontology was a haphazard pseudo-science. Later, when data contradicting this became available they corrected it. This is somehow supposed to undermine evolution.

    Correcting mistakes with new data and revising old theories is the strength of science. No credible scientist believes the theory of evolution won't be revised and changed a little bit in the future. But it's the best theory we have right now.

  • I decided not to wait for you to get back to me with evidence and did some of my own research.

    Marsh had no deceptive intent when he uncovered a fossilized Brontosaurus with a missing head, feet, and parts of the tail. He constructed the missing pieces the best he knew how, and when it was later discovered that his predictions were innacurate and the Brontosaurus was a Apatosaurus, corrections were made.

    So you should say a Brontosaurus is a Apatosaurus, not that they don't exist.

  • There you go...

    see what a little research will do for you?

    There's nothing in this video BLAMING Marsh for deceptive intent. This video merely teaches the facts.

    I find it kind of sad that you immediately want to argue with anything we teach just because we're Christian.

    Have you ever considered listening to and researching a thing before you attack it based on your preconceived ideas and worldview?

    ...just a thought.

  • "There's nothing in this video BLAMING Marsh for deceptive intent. This video merely teaches the facts."

    I didn't say there was. I was just reporting on what I had researched.

    "I find it kind of sad that you immediately want to argue with anything we teach just because we're Christian."

    I didn't even know this was a Christian made video when I first saw it.

    "before you attack it based on your preconceived ideas and worldview?"

    It's a still a racist vid, and that's still my point.

  • I was skeptical about everything said in this video because it's RACIST, not CHRISTIAN. By the time the video ended the fact that the bible was brought up was NOT my concern.

    And if your theology promotes equality, fine, but this video does not. You still haven't addressed why THIS VIDEO isn't racist.

    I am happy that I learned something through this vid, but your point would be much clearer if you dropped the stereotypes.

  • If, somehow, you were actually offended by our silly characters of 'Shama Lama & Dhing Dhong', then for that I apologize.

    But, I expect that you are equally as disgusted with Mike Meyers movies, Adam Sandler movies and Will Ferrell movies, to name just a few.

  • "I expect that you are equally as disgusted with Mike Meyers movies, Adam Sandler movies and Will Ferrell movies, to name just a few."

    If you don't see the difference between an ACTUAL ethnic actor in a movie being able to laugh at themselves playing a role (ex. Harold and Kumar, Gerry Bednob, etc.) and two white guys dressed up portraying negative, racist stereotypes then, well, good luck with that.

    Seriously, halfway through this vid I expected some white dude in black-face to show up.

  • You're right.

    I was not aware that Mike Meyers was an actual Hindu love therapist.

    Or that he was an actual Jewish woman or a German talk show host.

    I also didn't know that Will Ferrell was a gay fashion designer.

    Or that Rob Sneider was any number of racial characters he's portrayed.

    Or that Dana Carvey was a real church lady.

    Or that Eddie Murphy was an actual Jewish man.

    Or that Neil Patrick Harris was a womanizing heterosexual.

    I'm glad you've set me straight on all of this.

    Thank you.

  • "I was not aware that Mike Meyers was an actual Hindu love therapist."

    He's not.

    "Pitka identifies himself as "a spiritual teacher affiliated with no one faith" and has the same crass-and-goofy charm as Myers' Austin Powers and "Wayne's World" characters."

    - MSNBC

    Not to mention that there IS controversy within the Hindu community, not because Myer's character is actually SUPPOSED to be Hindu (he isn't), but uneducated Americans like yourself will make that very assumption.

  • "Or that he was an actual Jewish woman or a German talk show host."

    Mike Myers' character in Coffee Talk is actually parodying a real person named Linda Richman, who's jewish. Sprockets was more poking fun at the German art culture in the 1980s and minimalism than the entire German race.

    "I also didn't know that Will Ferrell was a gay fashion designer."

    For one thing, gay isn't a race. It took me a minute to realize you were talking about Zoolander. Was he even supposed to be gay?

  • "Or that Rob Sneider was any number of racial characters he's portrayed."

    Rob SCHNEIDER is an idiot. He's only good for cheap laughs and even his racial character portrayals are rivaled by the ones you have here in this vid. Ever hear of the term "yellowface"? Yeah...

    "Or that Dana Carvey was a real church lady."

    Didn't know "church lady" was a race.

  • "Or that Eddie Murphy was an actual Jewish man."

    Again...took a minute to realize. In Coming to America, right? He played every character in the barber shop in that scene, one of the characters he played was jewish. Another was white. Another was black. But again, none of them enforced negative stereotypes like the portrayals in your vid.

    You really, REALLY stretched some of these examples.

    Why not defend your OWN portrayals?

  • Now, I want to clarify something. I know there are stereotypes in movies. I mean, to deny that is retarded. But stereotypes are not always necessarily racist, or even bad.

    Dana Carvey's "church lady" is a negative stereotype, but it isn't racial. Eddie Murphey's jewish character in Coming to America is a stereotype, but it's not meant to make fun of jews.

    Rather than divert attention away from your video, why not explain why you used negative, racial, stereotypes to make your point?

  • Those movies are terrible.

  • What is this racist, insane crap? Is this supposed to be funny? Welcome back to the 1930s folks, where all asians look the same to our left and we have some strange mix of a Hindu and a Muslim off to our right.

    Seriously? No, really, seriously?

    You guys REALLY think you have debunked hundreds of peer reviewed scientific articles with this crap? Wow. Just...wow.

  • Wait a minute...

    Are you actually trying to debate the fact that the Brontosaurus never really existed?

    This isn't even a Christian topic.

    So, I'm curious, what's your excuse for attacking this well known teaching?

  • "Are you actually trying to debate the fact that the Brontosaurus never really existed?"

    The Brontosaurus is an Apatosaurus and thus was given that name, the fossils didn't just disappear when the name changed. That's like if a woman got married and changed her last name from Brown to Smith and says "Ms. Brown never existed", that's stupid.

    "This isn't even a Christian topic."

    You're right.

    "So, I'm curious, what's your excuse for attacking this well known teaching?"

    It's racist?

  • When you take an Apatosaurus and combine it with something else and name it, it doesn't work.

    Therefore, whatever name you came up with is moot.

    The Brontosaurus never existed.

    Why exactly is it so hard for you to wrap your brain around this?

  • I'd also like if you gave us some evidence for the claim that the skulls were switched? They are similiar, and because they are so similiar Brontosaurus were grouped with Apatosaurus. They are part of the same genus.

    And I know you don't think your video is racist. That's because you're daft. You are enforcing age-old negative stereotypes and somehow you don't think that's racist.

  • Talk about daft?

    The Brontosaurus is not SIMILAR to the Apatosaurus. It IS the Apatosaurus body mixed with the wrong head.

    I suppose if I took the body of a raccoon and put the head of a horse on it and called it a horcoon, then you would say that the horcoon is in the same genus as the raccoon?

    It sounds like your life contains a lot more struggles than just your understanding of theology.

  • "The Brontosaurus is not SIMILAR to the Apatosaurus. It IS the Apatosaurus body mixed with the wrong head."

    You are the only person I have ever heard make this claim. Evidence?

    "I suppose if I took the body of a raccoon and put the head of a horse on it and called it a horcoon, then you would say that the horcoon is in the same genus as the raccoon?"

    No.

    "It sounds like your life contains a lot more struggles than just your understanding of theology."

    Why'd you bring up theology?

  • There's only 1 human race, my friend.

    No nationality is any more advanced than any other nationality.

    We ALL got off the same boat (Noah's ark) together.

    How about you?

    What's your explanation of the different nationalities.

    I'm curious, according to evolution, which one's are more preferable than the others?

  • "There's only 1 human race, my friend.

    No nationality is any more advanced than any other nationality."

    And when you perpetuate negative stereotypes like in this video, you completely contradict yourself with that statement. Not that I'm against free speech or anything, you just need to admit when you're being racist?

    "How about you?

    What's your explanation of the different nationalities.

    I'm curious, according to evolution, which one's are more preferable than the others?"

    On topic?

  • "There's only 1 human race, my friend.

    No nationality is any more advanced than any other nationality.

    We ALL got off the same boat (Noah's ark) together.

    How about you?

    What's your explanation of the different nationalities.

    I'm curious, according to evolution, which one's are more preferable than the others?"

    Why are you changing the subject?

    - How is this video NOT racist?

    - Evidence for your head-switching claim?

  • I see that you are afraid of the inquiry.

    That's okay, I understand.

    If you want to accuse us of 'racism', then we need to look at theology. That's where we'll find the truth.

    Our Christian theology knows that all of the nationalities trace back to Noah and the ark over 4000 years ago.

    The Bible also teaches that we are ALL of one blood. No human being is any less or any more than any other human being.

    So, now let's look at your theology and then we can discuss who is and who isn't 'racist'.

  • Please, stop whining! This is not racism, it's humor. Racism is not understanding and accepting that people from different nations and origins look and talk differently. Racism is when you believe that they therefore are lesser in any way, or in the worst cases, ought to die. And who's the perverse thinking that "ding dong" is a genetalia joke!? please, go see a doctor for treatment so that your abnormal sex interest may be cured.

  • It's funny, and I learned something.

  • Also, it would be downright dishonest to leave out the fact that the specimen's nature (that of an adult Apatosaurus)was "outed" - by ELMER RIGGS, another peleontologist (Berman and MacIntosh identified the correct HEAD TYPE [Previously, Apatosaur reconstructions had used that of a Camarasaur]) - in _1903_.

    DO A LITTLE RESEARCH.

  • Professor Dhing Dong . . . oh I get it! It's a genetalia joke. Paul loved those jokes! And like Paul wished on the Pharasees, I wish you all would go emasculate yourselves for this horrible display of ignorance and racist foolishness. You folks need to get out and visit the world, not the Christian bubble, but the REAL world. Go hang out with some non-Christians, go to a foreign non-christian country. Please, expand your horizons because right now they are dangerously and embarrassingly small.

  • Actually, we ARE in a foreign non-Christian country.

    It's called America.

    But, exactly what does Christianity have to do with teaching about the Brontosaurus mistake?

    And, are you the only one that's never heard of the Shama Lama Ding Dong song?

  • Thank you for the small history of science lesson on the Brontosaurus. So what? If you are suggesting that scientists sometimes make mistakes but then review, correct, and thus advance the body of knowledge surely this is better than reiterating a lot misguided bible nonsense in perpetuity.

  • Thanks for the medicine, "A merry heart doeth good like a medicine."

  • Lawilson200,

    If your complaint is that the TRUTH group doesn't have any silly white guy characters, then you can rest assured that this isn't a problem. I myself got to play the silly white guy computer geek who rides his bicycle to work.

    Order has been restored to the universe!

    Blessings,

    Jonathan

  • I like a good fight, especially when they respond in kind. In otherwords, I never walk away without first pummeling the opposition.

  • Well then you will be here for quite a while.

  • Oh, and another thing. If they were to do this as two computer nerds would they be promoting European/American stereotypes?

  • It dosn't matter. Charlie Chan was once considered popular with American audiences and then it was recognized the racist blather that it was. We should have the courage to call a spade a spade and in this case, racist scourge.

  • []It dosn't matter.[]

    I disagree, sir.

    []Charlie Chan was once considered popular with American audiences and then it was recognized the racist blather that it was.[]

    I don't know much about Charlie Chan, but exactly why is having someone who fits a certain stereotype inherently racist?

  • You seem like a smart guy. Do I really need to spell it out for you.

  • I don't know. Perhaps your standards of racism are lower than mine.

  • Then I feel sorry for you.

  • Why is that? I find being offended less makes life much more enjoyable. I while back racism would have been hanging people because their skin was a certain color. Now, people are offended at this kind of thing.

    That, my friend, is sad.

  • Racism comes in many forms. It is not just "hanging" people because of the color of their skin. Another form is inappropriate characterization of racial groups.

  • Again I ask, if it was white men being characterized stereotypically, would it be racism?

  • Have the Truth group make a video characterizing white men and we will find out.

  • The question has not been answered.

  • We here at the T.R.U.T.H. Group are secure enough in our love of ALL people groups.

    We know and understand that ALL people are descendants of Adam and, eventually, Noah.

    We're ALL of 1 blood.

    As a non-Christian, I assume that you believe differently?

  • So why then are you performing a characterization of ethnic groups that is not your own, based on long ago rejected stereotypes of thoese ethinic groups? If you wanted to pass along a message, behaved like yourselves.

  • Because, being myself, a pastey white boy (oops, was that racist, too?), isn't quite as entertaining.

    You never answered my question, though.

    What exactly do you believe about different 'races'?

    Don't you think that some 'races' are more highly evolved than others?

    How do you successfully mix that with PC liberalism?

  • Your questions are pointless. They seek to distract from your behavior. You are worst then a child, attempting to shift blame onto their other sibling for breaking their parent cookie jar.

  • Well, in this case, there is no cookie jar and nothing's been broken.

    But, I can tell, by your refusal to answer such a simple question, that your belief is not very PC.

  • This is not about my opinions, instead on your behavior. I am not sure why you like to keep avoiding the subject. You were wrong. Admit it! Like the good "Christian" that you claim to be.

  • I certainly don't claim to be a good Christian.

    There's no such thing.

    I'm bad.

    That's why I became a Christian.

    Perhaps when you come face to face with how bad you are, you might do the same.

    I'd be more than happy to explain how salvation works anytime you want.

    Just let me know.

  • So, by the claim that you are a "Christian" justify you to engage in any bad behavior that you want? You still have not come to terms with the bad behavior you demonstrated with making of your video.

    You know confession is good for the soul. After all, it is not my salvation I am worried about, it is yours.

  • Exactly what 'bad' behavior are you refering to?

    Bad behavior is inevitable.

    Being a Christian doesn't mean that you're perfect. It just means that you bow to the one who is.

    I can rest assured that my behavior is forgiven, though.

    So, I sincerely hope that eases your worries.

  • I see you are just like our illustrious Idiot in Thief. Wage wars against countries who pose no threat to the United States or were responsible for terrorist attacks. Engage in torture and illegal rendition of prisoners. And basically give the middle finger to the rest of the world. All the while, without accepting blame or responsibility.

  • Wow, you've got some deep seeded issues, don't you?

    I don't know what 'Thief' is, other than a great description of satan (John 10:10).

    And, I'm not sure why you're trying to blame the T.R.U.T.H. Group for your countries atrocities.

    It sounds like you should take those things up with your government.

    Or, get a new one.

  • For someone who like to refer to themselves as the "Truth Group," you are not very truthful. Especially with yourselves.

  • It is my prayer that God lift the veil of deception from your eyes so that you can know what truth is. (John 8:32)

    Until then, be safe, seek understanding and keep on watching.

  • Since I believe fully that you accept a false theology ("Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves." - Matthew 7:15), I wish to return the complement.

  • I find it ironic that you would quote the very scriptures that you don't believe in to try to make a point to me.

    I take the Bible very seriously.

    Someday, I hope you will to.

    Until then, just remember, persecuting Christianity doesn't have much of a payoff in the end.

  • Now you really are talking from ignorance. However, there is little point into entering a discussion on our theological differences (I am a modernist).

    As for you last comment, I hardly call to pointing the errors of your ways, and asking you to repent from your racist behavior as a form of "persecution."

  • There's obviously nothing I can do to help you understand the plight of your beliefs.

    Unfortunately, the day will come when you try to explain your 'modernist' ideas to God at the Judgment Seat.

    Quick prediction: You're not going to like the results.

    So, have fun while you still can.

  • This is funny, considering just how biblically unsound those who advocate a theology based around the so-called "rapture" (which you will not find in the Bible, no matter how hard you look) and ignore the teachings of the Church that Daniel's prophecy was fulfilled in 70 AD. Frankly, I have little worries on the day of judgment. It is you who should be worried for following a false theology.

  • Wow, for someone who wants to be right about SOMETHING, you sure do miss every opportunity.

    The word 'rapture' is in the Latin version of the Bible. The English version translates it as 'caught up'. (1 Thes 4:17)

    So, if it helps you, I DO believe in the 'CAUGHT UP'.

    Although, I fail to see what this topic has to do with this video.

  • Nothing. It merely points to the error of your ways. And your interpretation of 1 Thes 4:17 is completely wrong. This is why you really ought to read scripture in context. Paul was not suggesting that God, would do a "Pre-Trib" send up. If you read Paul in context, he was relieving the concerns of the people to not to worry about Christians who already died. They too will be raised from the dead when Christ returns. Context. It is all about context.

  • Who said anything about interpretation?

    I didn't say anything about pre-trib, post-trib or mid-trib.

    I merely said that I believe in 1 Thes 4:17.

    I take the Bible seriously.

    Your one-sided argument is amusing to me, though.

    I'm sorry that you feel the need to degrade others while trying to lift yourself up.

    That's not going to pan out for you.

    If you're just looking for a fight, you should buy a dog or something.

  • If you take the Bible seriously, then you should take 1 Thes 4:17 into proper context.

    As for the rest. Stick and Stones.

  • I also believe in John 8:32.

    Please, oh please, won't you tell me what's wrong with my interpretation of it?

  • And your interpretation is?

    As for your comment from yesterday, we already established you will not acknowledge your racism, we have established that you don't know the "truth" if it came and bit you in the other region. So I am not surprise that you stoop to name came calling to make up for your other shortcomings.

  • First, you labeled us racists, which we are not. (most of our best friends are of the human race)

    Then, you tell us our interpretation of a scripture is wrong, even though we've never commented on that scripture.

    And now, you accuse us of name-calling?

    Exactly when did this happen?

    If you would like to argue about something, please try to pick something that actually exists.

  • Perhaps you should add deniers to your list of faults.

    Afterall, this is the hole you are digging. I am merely responding to what your are posting. Beyond that, I really don't give an excrament. You have already demonstrated yourselves as dishonest people.

  • Okay, you win.

    We are officially bored with your pointless spewing of hatred and circular non-reasoning.

    However, in the long run, you may not remember us, but please don't forget about what Jesus did for you.

    He paid the price that you'll never be able to afford. Whenever you decide to find out what He's all about, He'll be waiting for you.

    Don't wait till it's too late.

  • Yes, I will always follow the TRUE message of Christ our Savior and reject heresy.

    I hope someday you will find it in your own hearts, the evil you cause by racial stereotyping people in your characterization and turn to Christ and ask forgiveness. For when you do, you will be redeemed.

  • I sincerely pray for anyone that might take spiritual advice from you.

    When you finish correcting the Bible and setting everything straight, let me know.

    Maybe God will move over and share His throne with you.

    Until then, we're going to keep focused on the true God and His true Word.

    And, I'm sorry that our calling doesn't line up with your agenda.

    Oh well.

  • I thought you were done with this thread. So why are you insisting on continuing? Admit your racism and move on! If you are not Chinease or Indian, then you should not play a character of one. Especially when all you are doing is advancing a stereotype (that is racism).

  • I am truly sorry that you choose to be wrong.

  • "I am truly sorry that you choose to be wrong."

    On.....? Care to give an example? I think once again, you are seeking to avoid your own racist behavior.

  • "Maybe God will move over and share His throne with you." Funny thing is, I don't believe in God's throne either. You have to realize that there are rational intelligent people around you that do not believe a shred of what you believe. Your beliefs are small minded, sectarian and scary. My agenda (and any rational human being's agenda) is nothing more than a loss of dogma and an increase in rigorous investigation. Your dogma has stunted you ability to grow or change. Shame on you.

  • If that truly was your agenda, then we'd have a lot more in common.

    However, I'm sorry that our 'small minded' beliefs threaten you so much.

    We'll pray for you.

  • It's fun AND educational!

    Good video!

  • I don't think you can actually knock out a full grown man with one of those.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more