Susskind, he promotes black holes wich doesn't exist, runs for evolution, and he's invited by tedtalks wich it's supported by goldman sachs and other companies.
Even if Feynman had been been my professor, I would still have been mediocre. But in the higher echelon of mediocre, merely by being taught by him. He was, and still is, a wonderful tutor who taught people to think in a different , get logical, way. He is sadly missed.
@Mycha31 Have you ever seen a lecture by him? He thinks he uses no jargon, but he does. As any physicist that give names to ideas and concepts (higgs bosom?). These become jargon: tools for physicists to communicate quickly about ideas. Philosophers also do have those. He calls them jargon derisively, but this just shows his mediocre empathy to other disciplines. Quantum mechanics sometimes get things right, but not more often than the best philosophy. Have you checked string-theory lately?
@Wrath0fKhan Has better reasons or thinks he has better reasons? To each problem his own vocabulary, i believe. Physics can only explain consciousness 'away'. The presumption of physicists is to think that matrices and probabilities plus photosensors is going to explain consciousness.
Enter Hessians, Hermitians, Abelians. Complex names for simple ideas. Jargon. Not better.
@troglodite "has better or thinks has better" Better... Why? Because "his" models ultimately have much better predictive powers than "yours". "to each problem ... i believe" You can believe whatever you want to believe. I agree with that. "explain consciousness "away"" "Away" with consciousness, indeed. watch?v=E8V8rtdXnLA "The presumption of physicists" And thats a "good" presumption because in its consequences, it is the most "operative" one. "jargon" Yet you still dont get it.
@Wrath0fKhan you also believe what you want to believe. BTW, i have published papers in particle physics. Models don't 'work', models 'fit'. The same with words.
Yea... You even cant properly quote me for whatever reason that is (i.e. Ive never said that models would actually work).
"Its to get to your level"
Wouldnt that be something! We wouldnt have to be discussing obvious crackpottery. Holy sh*t... What am I still doing here? Lowering myself to your level. Time to jet! Bye bye!
@archaedemos I thought that...probably the consequence of knowing him/living in the same area. I wish i sounded like him, even if i didnt say thing 1/100th as clever.
I love the videos where authentically notable people are talking, or authentically notable people are being talked about, or, as is the case here, both.
@FFSray Any set of notions not based on evidence from the scientific method are inherently religious in nature and therefore bologna. Perhaps you are a religious believer after all.
@alvincay100 well then you have truly no idea of philosophy and i won't even bother arguing with you... come back when you've read hegel or something... comparing philosophy with religion is just outrages. your comment just shows that you have no idea what philosophy represents
@alvincay100 now that i thought of it, your thought of comparing philosophy to religion gets even more ridiculous because the first atheist were philosophers (epikur for example) who engaged the question wether or not there is a god through pure logic, reason and in their days without ANY nature-science. sure, the philosophical-"scientificmethod" differs from the naturescientific one, but even hegel said about metaphysical problems that they can not be established as science...
with no pre-content about this guy Richard Faynman i felt it could have been a story about anyone. other content on Ted feels more appealing because there is no need for pre-content to enjoy. still was good story but it was not appealing to me :(
I have read two of Sussikind's books and have seen several of his lectures, all of which were excellent. Though I must say that this video comes of as quite narcissistic to me with his constant comparisons to Feynman. Perhaps the comparisons are fair, but they nonetheless come off as narcissistic to me.
Leonard Susskind is such a genuine speaker, thinker, person etc. Ah, watching some of the free stuff he puts out from stanford is so wonderful... Just so real, him and feynman both... great ted talk, wish it were longer =[
great talk.... although i have absolutely zero in-depth knowledge of physics i could really understand and thought the way in which he explained and told his stories were fantastic.
This was more of a eulogy than a TEDTalk, but was Feynman was a fascinating man. And of course anything fascinating is worth talking is worth a TEDTalk.
Awesome talk, I'm a huge Feynman fan, also Susskind has a bunch of free lecture series here on youtube anyone can watch and learn about quantum mechanics. Awesome!
It seems like Richard Feynman was actually a very interesting person not only in science but in everyday life. Good to know there are some people interested in his works.
Well.. Feynman is my personal hero and I'm a big fan of Susskind, so this is one of the gratest TED talks ever in my opinion. Sure, it doesn't touch on very much of what makes me a Feynman and Sussnid fan, but my fanboyness shines through I guess :D
what? eat bologna full of bologna? seriously, Love the if you can't say it simply you aint got it. ought be song, and maybe I wasn't meant to get it till it put in simple terms. . like genius being our give the insights for riding the crest of our cosmic potential. we are indeed, evolution in progress with all we consciously move through
I have heard so many talk about Feynman that knew him, such as this video. From it all, it seems like Feynman was an extraordinary human being (and scientist of course) who enjoyed having fun. I think one can say he truly enjoyed his life.
Excellent talk! I really enjoyed listening to him talk about Feynman, he was such a great man. If only Richard and Carl Sagan were alive today, what a dream world that would be. These scientsts are the REAL celebrity's, not famous actors or come-and-go popstar. These guys figured out how the universe works, and then found the words to explain it in layman's terms. We will struggle to ever repay the debt we owe these great scientists.
@jaylias you're right I did understand a lot about the world reading Feynman, and those were simple words, not complex jargon, he is great, and still lives in our minds and textbooks
@Mrmoc7 - And what exactly is mainstream philosophy? I think you just set yourself up for a fail there big guy, Especially when philosophy only means the think about a subject in depth.
It's very disappointing that he only had 15 minutes. You cannot have just 15 minutes to talk about Richard Feynman. Susskind should have had at least half an hour.
I've re-read my copy of Classic Feynman about 3 times, and I've listened to the audio cd it came with, "Los Alamos From Below" at least 9 or 10 times. What a curious character he was!
this is a talk about one of the smartest people of the last century and the comment section is filled with a bunch of idiots trying to be first to reply :/
@Neylonx this is good. means even the idiots are listening. Soon our civilization will transform at one point idiots didnt read and could remain ignorant. Now you have to try really hard not to learn anything. Soon it shall be impossible.
Susskind, he promotes black holes wich doesn't exist, runs for evolution, and he's invited by tedtalks wich it's supported by goldman sachs and other companies.
rx327prime 4 weeks ago
@rx327prime
surely your joking...
mdwarrior27 2 weeks ago
Rewatching this 3 months later saddens me. What a shame that people like Leonard give arguments to the masses of religious physicist zealots.
troglodite 4 months ago
5:10 loved this part
mattysimsoficial 4 months ago
Even if Feynman had been been my professor, I would still have been mediocre. But in the higher echelon of mediocre, merely by being taught by him. He was, and still is, a wonderful tutor who taught people to think in a different , get logical, way. He is sadly missed.
jc333jc 6 months ago
Susskind's attitude towards philosophical concepts is typical of pretensious people who thinks their own jargon has primacy.
troglodite 8 months ago
@troglodite I think his point was you don't need fancy jargon of any type.
Mycha31 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mycha31 Have you ever seen a lecture by him? He thinks he uses no jargon, but he does. As any physicist that give names to ideas and concepts (higgs bosom?). These become jargon: tools for physicists to communicate quickly about ideas. Philosophers also do have those. He calls them jargon derisively, but this just shows his mediocre empathy to other disciplines. Quantum mechanics sometimes get things right, but not more often than the best philosophy. Have you checked string-theory lately?
troglodite 4 months ago
@troglodite
"who thinks their own jargon has primacy"
He surely has much better reasons to think so than any other "jargon" user.
Wrath0fKhan 4 months ago
@Wrath0fKhan Has better reasons or thinks he has better reasons? To each problem his own vocabulary, i believe. Physics can only explain consciousness 'away'. The presumption of physicists is to think that matrices and probabilities plus photosensors is going to explain consciousness.
Enter Hessians, Hermitians, Abelians. Complex names for simple ideas. Jargon. Not better.
troglodite 4 months ago
Wrath0fKhan 4 months ago
@Wrath0fKhan you also believe what you want to believe. BTW, i have published papers in particle physics. Models don't 'work', models 'fit'. The same with words.
troglodite 4 months ago
@troglodite
"you also believe what you want to believe"
Of course, of course...
"i have published papers in particle physics"
Niiiiiiice.
"Models dont work, models fit"
Pffffffffft.
"the same with words"
You are starting to discredit yourself. But thats OK with me.
Wrath0fKhan 4 months ago
@Wrath0fKhan discrediting meself? It's to get to your level!
troglodite 4 months ago
@troglodite
"discrediting meself"
Yea... You even cant properly quote me for whatever reason that is (i.e. Ive never said that models would actually work).
"Its to get to your level"
Wouldnt that be something! We wouldnt have to be discussing obvious crackpottery. Holy sh*t... What am I still doing here? Lowering myself to your level. Time to jet! Bye bye!
Wrath0fKhan 4 months ago
Susskind has no idea about consciousness.
troglodite 8 months ago
greatness
foketesz 8 months ago
Damn.. if only i had a teacher like that.. maybe it would have been me there.... (?)
DeepAbsentia 8 months ago
@DeepAbsentia Damn.. It is so True
human2011able 8 months ago
When I was taught OO programming I was told it was a "paradigm shift" in software engineering.. so I slapped him.
jacksawild 9 months ago
yes. there is also a lot of baloney in ted talks and people trying to sell something. Susskind got it right! lol
mahatmaBit 9 months ago
You sound like him(Feynman) Leonard (:
archaedemos 9 months ago
@archaedemos I thought that...probably the consequence of knowing him/living in the same area. I wish i sounded like him, even if i didnt say thing 1/100th as clever.
xkoenigseggx 9 months ago
@xkoenigseggx nice (: me too
archaedemos 9 months ago
I love the videos where authentically notable people are talking, or authentically notable people are being talked about, or, as is the case here, both.
JeanKM1 9 months ago 2
very interesting talk.... btw is the dude carrying a whiskey flask with him :)
sakokosa 9 months ago 2
Richard Feynman....ma man...
TimmacTR 9 months ago
WHY WOULD THEY GIVE ANYTHING INVOLVING RICHARD FEYNMAN A TIME LIMIT!
axelasdf 9 months ago 21
Nobody's brought up that Susskind speaks like Christopher Walken? Lots of examples but 7:24 is the first one I found...hyPOTenuse!
eonblue32 9 months ago 3
Well what was the "simple" thing he wrote down?
ChasinTranes 9 months ago
keith jardine in 40 years? anyone?
vardana 9 months ago
Philosophy is bologna
alvincay100 9 months ago
@alvincay100 i am sorry but no :/
FFSray 9 months ago
@FFSray Any set of notions not based on evidence from the scientific method are inherently religious in nature and therefore bologna. Perhaps you are a religious believer after all.
alvincay100 9 months ago
@alvincay100 well then you have truly no idea of philosophy and i won't even bother arguing with you... come back when you've read hegel or something... comparing philosophy with religion is just outrages. your comment just shows that you have no idea what philosophy represents
FFSray 9 months ago
@alvincay100 now that i thought of it, your thought of comparing philosophy to religion gets even more ridiculous because the first atheist were philosophers (epikur for example) who engaged the question wether or not there is a god through pure logic, reason and in their days without ANY nature-science. sure, the philosophical-"scientificmethod" differs from the naturescientific one, but even hegel said about metaphysical problems that they can not be established as science...
FFSray 9 months ago
@alvincay100 ...because you can not test them. hegel was a real strict philosopher in that case.
FFSray 9 months ago
with no pre-content about this guy Richard Faynman i felt it could have been a story about anyone. other content on Ted feels more appealing because there is no need for pre-content to enjoy. still was good story but it was not appealing to me :(
iFarsight 9 months ago
@iFarsight Start reading up on Feynman. You'd be doing yourself a huge favor.
Phelan666 9 months ago
Richard Feynman sounds like the Dr. House.
SuperiorApostate 9 months ago 3
oh wow. i busted out laughing at "the shortcut distance". :3 i don't laugh very often.
OpakeArawra2 9 months ago
Another reason I love Feynman: he frequented strip clubs and always ordered a Sprite while enjoying the girls.
MrHotpantsImComin 9 months ago 2
I didn't understand the last sentence... Anyone can write it please ?
AtomicSushi92130 9 months ago
@AtomicSushi92130
Bologna is meat in a sandwich. It's also another word for bullshit.
What he means is this: You need to get read of all the BS (religion, woo, etc.) in you life (sandwich).
Aaberg123 9 months ago
@Aaberg123 Thks a lot ! These kind of metaphor is a bit hard to understand for a foreigner
AtomicSushi92130 9 months ago
dick wtf?
leparditas 9 months ago
@leparditas Dick is short for Richard. Serious
roidroid 9 months ago
I've got to see some of these puzzles and games that Feynman liked.
AlanKey86 9 months ago
A completely SFW talk about one of the greatest minds in the world, and every other word is Dick.
akylae101 9 months ago
911 vids :O
mafbbb 9 months ago
The trashcan of history xD
xilliah 9 months ago
Glad I didn't unsubscribe now
SkepticalBastard 9 months ago
damn it screw the time limit I wanna hear more stories about Feynman
DaSurge26 9 months ago 8
@DaSurge26 lol me too! XP
iurak6868 9 months ago
incidentally, this guy sounds like the dude from 'the big lebowsky'
knobcheese69 9 months ago 2
I think that last statement was beautiful. It was a simple solution to a complex set of problems. :)
t3tsuyaguy1 9 months ago 28
I don't think I've ever met anyone that love science but didn't love Richard Feynman.
PrometheanRunGood 9 months ago 2
@PrometheanRunGood People who don't love science also tend to love Feynmann...!!
yp06407012 9 months ago
anybody catch the flask laying on the ground next to Susskind? lol
natedejuggla 9 months ago
I have read two of Sussikind's books and have seen several of his lectures, all of which were excellent. Though I must say that this video comes of as quite narcissistic to me with his constant comparisons to Feynman. Perhaps the comparisons are fair, but they nonetheless come off as narcissistic to me.
Plz, no hate.
GoatNoodle 9 months ago
One of the great, GREAT ones of physics, and a regular guy, too. If you read any pop physics book this year, read his great:
The Black Hole War: My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics
It's just fascinating. (Yes, he's an outstanding writer, too)
RichardFeynmanRules 9 months ago
Leonard Susskind is such a genuine speaker, thinker, person etc. Ah, watching some of the free stuff he puts out from stanford is so wonderful... Just so real, him and feynman both... great ted talk, wish it were longer =[
millamulisha 9 months ago 2
Might just be me, but Susskind sounds kind of like Feynman did when he talks.
TubeFreakification 9 months ago 3
He's dead wrong about the idea of conscious machines being purely a scientific question, it's clearly both a scientific and philosophical question.
AtheistAntitheist 9 months ago
@AtheistAntitheist Well that was easy.
Kojak7snap 9 months ago
@AtheistAntitheist uhhhhhhm, sure… :->
595o 9 months ago
I've heard this guy talk a few times. I always think he sounds like Jeff Bridges.
Athena1129 9 months ago
He really was one of a kind. I feel lucky just to have watched him on you tube.
justkarmatoo 9 months ago
If you cannot explain something in simple terms then you do not really understand it. That is incredibly profound.
Wormtail81 9 months ago 7
Really entertaining talk, could listen to this guy for hours
Slashtap3 9 months ago
reminds me of cave johnson
Sternertime 9 months ago
911 videos :O
stenchinator 9 months ago
great talk.... although i have absolutely zero in-depth knowledge of physics i could really understand and thought the way in which he explained and told his stories were fantastic.
thatcoulhavebeenfun 9 months ago
This was more of a eulogy than a TEDTalk, but was Feynman was a fascinating man. And of course anything fascinating is worth talking is worth a TEDTalk.
rpm297 9 months ago
Awesome talk, I'm a huge Feynman fan, also Susskind has a bunch of free lecture series here on youtube anyone can watch and learn about quantum mechanics. Awesome!
VonKraut 9 months ago
Wow
DrInfidel 9 months ago
LOL @ the whisky tin beside his foot...hes definitly under the influence
mrtp 9 months ago
"shortcut distance"
I will from today on call the hypotenuse the "shortcut distance.'
NewWorldOrderRED 9 months ago 2
Meh.
dookiecheez 9 months ago
...and the idea worth spreading is !?!
gaiagale 9 months ago
it was not coincidence that Feynman was an actor, acting is connected to being a good communicator and communication is key to thought
valken666 9 months ago
Keep it simple ;) love it! New material for me to read. I feel like I've been living under a rock after watching this video. Lol
DurexDurpaneu2 9 months ago
great talk
valken666 9 months ago
pure genius
twistedbass15 9 months ago
Did anyone else think that it said 'Leonard Skynyrd' at first glance?
WilliamEGD 9 months ago
Richard Feynman is my idol.
IceJT15 9 months ago
"What Feynman hated more than anything else was fonyness, false sophistication, jargon"
Richard Feynman - no bullshit.
MarkArandjus 9 months ago 48
I never knew Richard Feynman, but I felt he was a friend from the first time i heard of him...
Thank you!
javamanV3 9 months ago
It seems like Richard Feynman was actually a very interesting person not only in science but in everyday life. Good to know there are some people interested in his works.
hapkinger 9 months ago 2
Well.. Feynman is my personal hero and I'm a big fan of Susskind, so this is one of the gratest TED talks ever in my opinion. Sure, it doesn't touch on very much of what makes me a Feynman and Sussnid fan, but my fanboyness shines through I guess :D
chixulub 9 months ago 2
@futureboy00... first, first....so there ;)
lulufullana 9 months ago
I have the book 'Surely you're kidding Mr. Feynman'. Fascinating guy!
MrTerryKay 9 months ago 2
That part about the particle in motion having less time when it interacts with another particle blew my mind.
derman077 9 months ago
When I saw the name Richard Feynman it only took me 0.15 seconds to decide to click on this video.
Monk3ySee 9 months ago 5
@Monk3ySee It only took me the Planck time. So there.
deedubya286 9 months ago
what? eat bologna full of bologna? seriously, Love the if you can't say it simply you aint got it. ought be song, and maybe I wasn't meant to get it till it put in simple terms. . like genius being our give the insights for riding the crest of our cosmic potential. we are indeed, evolution in progress with all we consciously move through
HamOnCan 9 months ago
I have heard so many talk about Feynman that knew him, such as this video. From it all, it seems like Feynman was an extraordinary human being (and scientist of course) who enjoyed having fun. I think one can say he truly enjoyed his life.
qncsc 9 months ago
I have no idea who the guy who is talking is, or who he talks of, but he sounds a lot like me, just 60 years older and more... geniusish :p
Odinshi 9 months ago
he actually sounds a bit like feynman.
skorpen2 9 months ago
@skorpen2 Yea I noticed that too, wonder what is going on there.
adrenacrumb 9 months ago
YES LEO!
YES!
Silhouette93 9 months ago
thx for posting these!!!!!!!
Angusliketheburger 9 months ago
All this man needs to do to look like Yoda is wake up in the morning.
razer11 9 months ago
Excellent talk! I really enjoyed listening to him talk about Feynman, he was such a great man. If only Richard and Carl Sagan were alive today, what a dream world that would be. These scientsts are the REAL celebrity's, not famous actors or come-and-go popstar. These guys figured out how the universe works, and then found the words to explain it in layman's terms. We will struggle to ever repay the debt we owe these great scientists.
jaylias 9 months ago 7
@jaylias you're right I did understand a lot about the world reading Feynman, and those were simple words, not complex jargon, he is great, and still lives in our minds and textbooks
valken666 9 months ago
1 Feynman > 1000 Philiosophers
CognosSquare 9 months ago 5
Richard feynman
heiki1234 9 months ago
he even talks like feynmann
Grundalizer 9 months ago
The more I hear about Feynman the more I like him.
Darvinisti 9 months ago
@Darvinisti - I am the same way with "animal" from Sesame Street.
TheSpankymonkey 9 months ago
very good :)
Brascofarian 9 months ago
I always knew the philosophers were full of sh*t. Thanks Feynman.
Mrmoc7 9 months ago
@Mrmoc7 Feynman was also a philosopher you moron. What ever a genius does there will be morons trying to do the same and failing.
Darvinisti 9 months ago
@Darvinisti
I imagine that his philosophy was more grounded and contained less intellectual posturing and verbiage garbage compared to mainstream philosophy.
Mrmoc7 9 months ago
@Mrmoc7 - And what exactly is mainstream philosophy? I think you just set yourself up for a fail there big guy, Especially when philosophy only means the think about a subject in depth.
TheSpankymonkey 9 months ago
@TheSpankymonkey
"when philosophy only means the think about a subject in depth."
I'm not the one setting my self up for "fail," and no, I'm not talking about the typo.
Mrmoc7 9 months ago
is this a re-upload?
defect530 9 months ago
@defect530 it was uploaded on tedxtalks the 15 of February
ChalleFoV3 9 months ago
Ease up there neylon-warrior... i'm a physicist myself... thus i see the absurdity of writing senseful comments in the youtube comment section.
Think of it this way: if Feynman could comment this video... he would write "1rd!".
SoulProvider88 9 months ago
It's very disappointing that he only had 15 minutes. You cannot have just 15 minutes to talk about Richard Feynman. Susskind should have had at least half an hour.
majestic93 9 months ago
I've re-read my copy of Classic Feynman about 3 times, and I've listened to the audio cd it came with, "Los Alamos From Below" at least 9 or 10 times. What a curious character he was!
kryptoknightmare 9 months ago
Whoever is directing did a great job. Great work on the cameras to keep it interesting despite his non mobility during the presentation.
frebel93 9 months ago 83
this is a talk about one of the smartest people of the last century and the comment section is filled with a bunch of idiots trying to be first to reply :/
Neylonx 9 months ago 161
@Neylonx why so serious? I don't think feynman would be
defaultuser88 9 months ago
@defaultuser88 id like to think someone that intelligent would have a sense of humour above that of trying to get first on a youtube video.
Neylonx 9 months ago
@Neylonx first
futureboy00 9 months ago
@Neylonx this is good. means even the idiots are listening. Soon our civilization will transform at one point idiots didnt read and could remain ignorant. Now you have to try really hard not to learn anything. Soon it shall be impossible.
princeofexcess 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the person after 1st,99th and 1rd
cool2t 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1rd!
SoulProvider88 9 months ago
99th who gives a fuck
Miloglu 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1st
defaultuser88 9 months ago