bullshit people in the givernment are not inoccent, they get their cut one way or another, everyone governement official or not has a price. who has the gold makes the rules.
man total bullshit...the government and cia get funds from narvcotics.......we waste billions on weed enforcement with a totally benign plant....yet still idiots want to wipe out weed....well, it aint ever happening....
@SGSSI25 the problem dipshit....is that the american and british government fund their ops with narcotics....its keeps their jobs significant too to put more drugs on the street. This was just in the news....as far as "yes i will" well no i wont and neither will a gazillion other citizens of the earth. WE ARE LEGION
@232323C tell the coast guard, the royal navy, the royal australian navy, the australian coast guard, the royal canadian navy, the cops from anywhere, the spanish navy, and the prison guards that
@dirtbikersteve Government doesn't get any money from narcotics? No, they're not slinging dime bags on the corner, but they get billions in funding for the war on drugs. Billions.
Excellent job you fucking moron Coasties and DEA douchers - YOU'VE WON THE WAR ON DRUGS!
Oops. No you haven't, you've lost miserably and the low cost and high purity of illegal drugs proves you're a bunch of fucking losers.
USCG drug interdiction and DEA are the fucking welfare queens of the 21st century. Go get real jobs you fucking failure and stop sucking off the tit of taxpayers.
So this troll shizzleman makes a post on the video I just referenced asking that I be banned.. I suppose for finding the video and daring to use it flog him with.
Your a piece of work shizzleman.. I rest my case on this point.. that video I referenced says more then I could in 8 more pages on the subject. Have fun all.. and I'll raise a glass (of legal) booze to the CG members that made this video possible. Semper Paratus!
This reminds me of some book on Amazon called: The Org 'Biography of a Violent Man'. Not sure how a book can be so violent and still funny at the same time, but it is.
This isn't basement weed... the money that you pay goes directly to those who don't have our best interest, or the best interest of those communities they infest... at heart.
One quick look at Juarez should open your eyes. If you don't feel the two should be lumped in together.. then perhaps your next vacation should be in Juarez.. eh?
@PaleHearse Old saying- if you don't know your history your doomed to repeat it!! Look what happened during the prohibition of alcohol, do you know how many criminal organizations we created when we tried to make it illegal? Remember Al Capone? Same with the war on drugs, we are allowing the black market and the cartels to thrive!! you will not stop people from using drugs, just like how you can not stop people from using alcohol!! Wake up people our gov is throwing away ourr dollars!!
The reason for the end of prohibition was quite different for the reason we ended opium dens. On that there can be no historical argument. I am a study of history, but when having this argument with pot heads it becomes rapidly clear that they don't view their drug of choice as any more dangerous then alcohol.. when it is. Now I grant you it's not but by a small margin and opium it's not.. but at some point a line has to be drawn .. and marijuana is currently that line.
@PaleHearse see now your giving your opinion not facts which makes your argument invalid!!! Marijuana is much safer then alcohol and if you don't believe that then you need to pull your head out of the sand and start doing some research instead of believing everything your told!!!
You sir.. are being absurd. As I stated before.. both are very close.. but as study after study has shown, marijuana use is insidious and nearly impossible to recover from. Not nearly as easy to put down as alcohol.. though both have disastrous effects on the body. Again.. your approaching this from the position of the pot head who is trying to defend what he/she is doing by comparing it to something ELSE that's nasty. Check your science before challenging my own.
Trust that I've become quite used to being shouted down by pot heads that haven't thought this through.
I'm not going to waste my time posting links to things that are easily researched on your own.. should you ever put the bong down and do the research. Instead, all you will do is to try and say you want it legalized without giving that thought either. You don't want it legal like alcohol, you want it legal like caffeine or nicotine... so you have no responsibility.
@PaleHearse You fucking asshole you don't care about anyone but yourself!! This whole protectionist bs has gone to far in this country!! You don't give a damn about anyone but yourself, you want to continue filling our jails and spending money we don't have on a failed war WAKE THE FUCK UP!!! You don't get to tell people what they can or cannot put in their bodies we are not children!! I don't even smoke pot and your going off calling me a pothead shows how ignorant you really are!!
Again.. your arguments are old. You accuse me of "not caring about anyone but myself" yet I'm not the one here who wants to smoke weed at any cost... the cost of flat out ignoring the deleterious physical and social effects of this drug... and others I'm assuming. Like I said.. make it legal.. just do it in such a way that keeps it out of the hands of kids as much as possible and make YOU responsible for the stupid things you do (or don't do.. like go to work) while your stoned.
On the contrary, I do have a say in who I do and do not hire and hence what you "put in your body".. Also, society DOES tell folks what they can and can not put in their body and operate a car.
I will most certainly screen out pot heads from my business.. because they are a danger to others and to themselves. If your not a child.. then don't act like one. You want to make it legal.. then be responsible for what you do... man up. Your not working for me while drunk or stoned.
@ridah925 This is not about operating vehicles or being in the workplace under the influence, obviously anyone in their right mind would agree with what you said about that. Nobody is saying do away with responsibility and morals!! Your argument is so weak, and you showed everyone how ignorant you really are!! I'm done with you don't even bother to respond!!!
@ridah925@PaleHearse Sorry for being a big butinski (troll) it just looks like the two of you got you're signals crossed, got off on the wrong foot, but acutally have the exact same view point. I also don't smoke pot, but here in Californian it's a BOOMING BUSINESS and could have solved all of our economic woes when it came on our ballot to make it recreational. I don't think Pale Hearse is against economic recovery or for sending the handicapped to prison. Just medicinal here & it WORKS!
Oh.. I'd not say we have the same view point... and no, taxing pot isn't going to solve CA's budget issues. All taxing pot will do is put more people in jail for tax evasion. For them, it's not about responsibility.. it's about getting high. Once we have that clear.. we're golden.
If you want economic recovery your going to have to do away with unionized entitlements for half done jobs. We also probably differ on the use of the term "medicinal".
@PaleHearse Can Marijuana Help Rescue California's Economy? (Time) < google.
I've smoked pot before it didn't make me want to evade paying my taxes, I just got the munchies. Apparently that's one of it's big draws for cancer patients during chemotherapy, that and it helps alleviate pain.
Yup.. THC is shown to lower vascular pressure.. especially in the eye and it's proven to increase the appetite of those undergoing cancer treatment. No argument there.. it should be taken off the schedule one list.
But.. that's not what they are looking to do with so called "medical" marijuana. They.. ah.. want to smoke it.. for anxiety. They want to allow children to use it.. for concocted ADHD.. when it's shown that the remedy for that comes from self discipline alone.
Spoken like a true pot head troll looking for his medical marijuana prescription.
I'll address your only actual point. Anxiety does not cause chronic hypertension... it is an exacerbating contributing factor. If your looking to cure your "anxiety" you might want to try something a bit less physically and mentally addictive. If it's the hypertension your trying to cure.. diet and other drugs are far more effective at managing chronic hypertension then THC is. So try again.
@PaleHearse I don't suffer from anything except inexcusable character assasinations.
Life can't be compartmentalized as easily as you seem to think it can be. There are many contributing factors as to how we remember information for instance, and how we develop debilitating and crippling prejudices as well. First year law school you're taught ambiguity. Some jackwagon was telling me that I was arguing to ignorance, well there are 4 options and he wasn't presenting ONE. Be open minded!
Open mindedness has it's limits. I am open minded when presented with points of view, but after examining the facts.. until new ones come to light.. it's acceptable to form an opinion based on what you understand to be true and can relate to others. I feel I've done that here. I do not feel that it's acceptable to continue to accept the abuse of prescriptions of smokeable marijuana. This isn't about relieving suffering.. it's about getting high.. let's get that perfectly clear.
@PaleHearse To whatever extent you don't take a position will be the extent that your assessment of the facts will be accurate.
Abuses do exist no doubt, but marijuana has a low incident of overdose and physical addiction, it's a hard drug to abuse. Ridah 925 made a comment about how we shouldn't have the right to control what a person ingests inside their own home especially when nothing else is at stake except THAT person. You take all of a person's liberties and life begins to suck.
I disagree about the physical addiction but because the drug, like alcohol, is so socially addictive.. it's hard to separate out it's physically addictive properties. Because it remains in the system, and the endocrine system adapts to the long term presence of THC... this separates it from alcohol. Alcohol is a short duration toxin that, though it has long term health effects, does not remain in the system forcing the body to adapt to it except in the case of chronic use/abuse.
.. do some of that research your talking about. As to the "man made compounds" in tobacco, even without those trace amounts, the amounts of natural tar alone in marijuana is staggering compared to tobacco.
Ingestion of THC via eye drops or consumption would only be considered medicinal by me and others where the amount given can be measured and it's intake monitored by a physician. Hence my persistent belief that they are out to get high..not to medicate. That covers it I think.
Untrue on a couple points.. physical addiction isn't just craving related. For example many heart medications are physically addictive in that with their sudden removal you can get huge spikes in blood pressure because the body can no longer produce the internal chemistry to regulate the circulatory system. Similar with THC. THC goes after certain aspects of the endocrine system, for example... as well as certain aspects of the circulatory and immune system. You may need to ...
Not talking about their state of mind.. we were talking about the physical "addictive" effects of THC.. right?
THC, because it lingers in the system for 30 days or more.. continues to have a variety of effects on the body that get worse over time. The mental debilitation that occurs is harder to quantify.. but not so with the effects on the immune system and the endocrine system.
Or are you back to your absurd idea that "anxiety kills".. or is somehow untreatable by other means?
@PaleHearse Hence my persistent belief that they are out to get high..not to medicate. That covers it I think < You're believing something about others states of mind, what someone is out to do and what they hope to gain from it goes to motive.
I work for a Dr. I can ask her anytime I have a question about disease and remedies. Plus each of us can do research on our own and form our own conclusions on the matter. I've cared for a number of people who have gone through withdrawl.
Ah.. no, not their state of mind but how they choose to have the drug delivered... so it simply an assessment ov motive based on the fact that they don't really care how much THC they are ingesting for any medicinal effect that can be monitored over time but instead so they can feel the effects of the THC.. clear as mud? So no,, not trying to get into their head that way.. just looking at evidence for motive as one would for any other crime.or passion.
@PaleHearse belief that they are out to get high..not to medicate. < that's clear as glass. My initial and still only response is: it's none of my business why someone gets high, it doesn't effect me. Everything is monitored in this world, the amount of active ingredients (THC) is carefully monitored. What are you thinking, the insurance compaines are telling their clients it's a "free-for-all"?
Hey Friend, maybe go back to the Baldwin/Dawkins upload and leave the doctoring to others?
... in marijuana today is astronomical compared to that from 20 years ago. But that's not even what I'm basing this on.. I know 2 fellows with glaucoma.. and I got a chuckle from each of them when they gave the same answer to a question posed to them.. I asked.. "Why don't you use the eye drops?"...
"The eye drops don't get you stoned.. ".. was the reply.
So no, there is a clinical difference between medical treatment and recreational use. That's not going to go away.
@PaleHearse They're still medicating, right? They smoke pot is their "reason" to get high, but "why" they're doing it could be a hundred different things that they're probably not even "aware" of themselves.
You're FIXATED on people getting high and why. There's probably a "reason" and "why" you are, but again I don't think you know yourself well enough to articulate it to me, and once you did, your state of mind is temporary so it might change before you even finished writing, see?
What I suppose I'm "fixated" on.. is that I don't much care for disingenuous people and liars. If you want to do something.. then don't hide behind a medical use excuse. Take responsibility for what you want to do.. defend what you want to do as best you can.. and then do it in a responsible way. You accused me of not "being in their head".. I simply pointed out situations where folks could medicate using THC and monitor the clinical intake.. but choose not to.
@PaleHearse wrote No, in MOST medical marijuana cases in CA they are NOT medicating anything.
Sure they are, that's why it's called medicine and you have to go see a Dr. and get a prescription for it. Do you know what presumption means? What about the presumption of innocence? I, like all Americans, have divine inalienable rights against anyone that interrupts unjustly my pursuit of happiness, my liberty, or my free will choices. The issue here is presumption of innocence not guilt.
While I do agree about what you pointed out in the erosion of our liberties, legalizing marijuana smoking without applying the appropriate responsibilities on it's use isn't going to fly with me. It's not tobacco or an energy drink. Are folks willing to go to jail for a DUI or "open container" for having pot unsecured in their car?
Are they willing to have CPS come for their kids because their kids have been repeatedly caught smoking or because they have pot accessible to them?
@PaleHearse Actually it is a tobacco that's why the preferred delivery system today is a vaporizer or ingestion through brownies or other food type products. Nicotine cigarettes have a number of "man made" drug additives that marijuana doesn't.
Anything you want to know can be found on the internet. Just from experience alone in California I'm not aware of anyone ever cited for just pot. In Arizona I had a girlfriend who got 2 years for a roach (small insignifican't amount, a cig. butt)
@ridah925 Jude is Patron Saint of lost causes, I'm not him but it looks like palehearse is opening up and I'm finding more agreement all the time. I was the number one salesman for the number one dealership of Mobile homes in the State of California one year. You have to find things to agree on and work out the details later. I don't see one real point where you two disagree and a half a dozen where you do. I followed him to this page and he's an atheist and I'm a Pentecostal, we're talking!
I personally would have no issue legalizing all drugs.. IF... and this is a VERY important IF..
IF.. it was a capital offense, or at the very least pre meditated murder to kill another person while under the influence of any drug, and IF there were NO publicly funded programs for drug addiction.
It's critical that should legalization ever occur, there would have to apply with it a social responsibility and remedy.
Someone watching this video might get the idea that their government is trying to stop drugs from entering the country, when in reality, the people who control the government are the same ones who control the drug trade.
what right do they have do they have to fire on a ship in international waters. There is nothing illegal about running around with a boat full of cocaine in international waters. It's the same principal that makes gambling booze cruises out of south florida legal. Gambling boat cruises out to international water and boom they are free to gamble.
@matt9822 They were in US waters. Even if they arn't; if they were heading towards US waters any sovereign nation can stop them before they enter their waters. But they would only do that for miltiray or last resort type of reasons were lives are at risk (i.e. if a russian sub got clsoe during the cold war it would ahve been blown up before it got in US waters) in this situation they probably waited until they got in the US in order for the evidence to be admissable.
wow were they even in united states water and they opened fire on an unarmed vessel i meanwho gives a crap if a couple idiots get high,and to add to that they actually hit the vessel then they vandallized private property by setting the boat on fire and shooting at it doesnt our gov't have anything better t do and do any of you people realize how much these boats cost
@MultiLeon333 well if you think about once they get out they'll go back to smuggling and by a brand new one that is probually better... but i do agree that it was dumb to destroy the boat
hookypooky, 2lbs? You mean 2 tons moron. And would you had rather they set it adrift, letting it become a hazard to nav? Burning it burned off the fuel onboard and I can't bet you a nod that they removed the barrels of fuel before setting it onfire. Unless you were there, best to sit back and keep your mouth shut and just enjoy the show..
if that was the taliban on that boat they would have shot at the coast guard they wouldnt have cared if they died but some of those coast guard fags would have cAme with them
@M3hammerdown - You expected them to save a boat that was already sinking? That single boat wasn't carrying that much fuel and oil as it is. Nothing in comparison to an offshore rig or a cruise ship. Not to mention once the boat reaches the bottom it may provide a little shelter for fish, although it was a relatively small boat.
They would have to kill me if they wanted it. Your life is over anyway. Cut open a bail shove your face in it and sniff as hard as you can a couple times before you start spraying them with bullets. Plain a simple. If you don't want your life to end simply don't do it for a living.
Come on guys, you know the reason the government and police stop drug dealers is cause if the general population had drugs everybody would stop working and we'd all be worthless and dying.
I thought it was pretty funny when that coast guard guy is stupid and says get down on the ground...then he changes what he says to get down on the deck. Lol there is no ground there. There is definately a deck though.
The laws are bullshit here too in Australia, a 9 year old can legally own a shotgun, but you have to over 18 to buy spray paint? It kind of sends a message of what the government supports: We don't want kids writing on walls, that'd be horrible! but we'll give a small child a fucking shotgun!
All that drug money this must be years and years agao cause in 2010 they would be sniping Blackhawks with RPGs and .50 cal Barret rifles I would AHHHHH!
feel sorry for the guys who get busted as there not big time dealers,but i wonder what the cartels do when there boat dont reach usa? do they just call it a loss? or would there familys pay by death for it?? i mean if its not on video like this one how do the cartels tell if they got robbed or busted??
Nice shooting, Tex. Any other country on earth would have blown that boat to smithereens. With the smugglers in it. Problem solved - they won't do it again.
Good job coast guard, thanks for polluting the water by lighting a boat on fire, you're as bad as BP. WTF does it matter anyways? Everyone in the world does drugs, whether it be caffeine, tobacco, alcohol, pain killers, pot, coke, etc. They are fighting a never ending war on drugs, and for what reason? Making stuff illegal is not going to stop anything. People are going to get what they want no matter what. Instead of wasting good drugs why don't you geniuses standardize and legalize?
@yellowpony302 fighting against drugs creates more jobs than legalizing otherwise i think it would be legal, in the end everything is about business, even though drugs would be such a big business fighting it creates more jobs
Those jobs are paid for with tax money though. If those drugs where legally regulated and sold by buisnesses, it would create a arguably equivalant amount of jobs as the DEA does. And they would bring in billions in annual tax revenue.
The DEA and police isn't a business though, and it sucks up tax money pointlessly trying to do something thats impossible.
We spend over 90 billion in tax dollars every year uselessly trying to "eliminate drugs". It doesn't work.
Time an time again the criminal would be in uniform....
blackpridentc 1 week ago
bullshit people in the givernment are not inoccent, they get their cut one way or another, everyone governement official or not has a price. who has the gold makes the rules.
MegaDaddyjake 1 week ago
but i love coke :(
carlcoxismygod 2 weeks ago
Coke busters FTW
BadAssEngineering 2 weeks ago
fucking stupid Americans..
boghdan2000 1 month ago
The coast guard are behaving like pirates
patriotisnot 1 month ago
@patriotisnot um yea thats the only way to operate in water..
513Scotchpagan 3 weeks ago
Thanks a lot for the pollution
SuperMazorquero 1 month ago
man total bullshit...the government and cia get funds from narvcotics.......we waste billions on weed enforcement with a totally benign plant....yet still idiots want to wipe out weed....well, it aint ever happening....
232323C 1 month ago
Comment removed
SGSSI25 1 month ago
@SGSSI25 the problem dipshit....is that the american and british government fund their ops with narcotics....its keeps their jobs significant too to put more drugs on the street. This was just in the news....as far as "yes i will" well no i wont and neither will a gazillion other citizens of the earth. WE ARE LEGION
232323C 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@232323C tell the coast guard, the royal navy, the royal australian navy, the australian coast guard, the royal canadian navy, the cops from anywhere, the spanish navy, and the prison guards that
"no I wont"
SGSSI25 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@232323C we dealt with entire terrorist networks who say
"no i wont" all the time.
so you fuckin try it, bitch.
and you look like a fuckin piss weak fat bitch to me, try it ??
I'll tell ya what, im 5 ft 11, 225 lbs, I lifted the front of a crown victoria, and punched a big fat dent in the kitchen sink.
I'll fuckin kill ya.
SGSSI25 1 month ago
@232323C we dealt with adolf hitler, who said "no I wont"
lol
SGSSI25 1 month ago
Comment removed
SGSSI25 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@232323C inmates tell the extraction force "no I wont"
SGSSI25 1 month ago
@232323C you r a moron drugs fuck up peoples lives and no one in the government gets money from narcotics so stfu
dirtbikersteve 1 month ago
@dirtbikersteve Government doesn't get any money from narcotics? No, they're not slinging dime bags on the corner, but they get billions in funding for the war on drugs. Billions.
smith45acp 3 weeks ago
thats why im joining the uscg, to laugh at people who lose drugs
FR3DisGAY 3 months ago
that was'nt 5 mil worth
MrChocoRabit 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Excellent job you fucking moron Coasties and DEA douchers - YOU'VE WON THE WAR ON DRUGS!
Oops. No you haven't, you've lost miserably and the low cost and high purity of illegal drugs proves you're a bunch of fucking losers.
USCG drug interdiction and DEA are the fucking welfare queens of the 21st century. Go get real jobs you fucking failure and stop sucking off the tit of taxpayers.
forthedefence82 4 months ago
Comment removed
forthedefence82 4 months ago
which island in the caribbean was this close to?
mrgoodlookin320 4 months ago
coke and weed in the same vid. please don't.
thetoneranger1 4 months ago
$5 million @ $5/joint sure.....
stoodstilltoolong 5 months ago
where is charlie sheen when you need him?
kemper1962 5 months ago
there usin shitty boats....gotta use go-fast(cigarette boat) dummies. if you aint doin it right u deserve to get toasted.
vinniP123 5 months ago
was 2:13 to 2:21 a joke? cause i laughed
coconuthead900000 6 months ago
dumbass cops piss in your pants hahaha
eminem4everchannel 6 months ago
...and then the pigs went home and smoked it
firuinthehouse 6 months ago
So this troll shizzleman makes a post on the video I just referenced asking that I be banned.. I suppose for finding the video and daring to use it flog him with.
Your a piece of work shizzleman.. I rest my case on this point.. that video I referenced says more then I could in 8 more pages on the subject. Have fun all.. and I'll raise a glass (of legal) booze to the CG members that made this video possible. Semper Paratus!
PaleHearse 6 months ago
I'm so glad they are spending our tax dollars to try and stop something that we demand!!! Gotta love our government
ridah925 6 months ago
i HATE when drug boys get BUST
lonnie8911 6 months ago
Pollute the seas much.
5029 7 months ago
Watching the 3 new Yamaha Outboards sink BREAKS MY HEART !!!!
AntonioCocaine 7 months ago
lol, coke busters.
StrikeCinematics 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This reminds me of some book on Amazon called: The Org 'Biography of a Violent Man'. Not sure how a book can be so violent and still funny at the same time, but it is.
dragongon71 8 months ago
please dont lump cannabis into the same category as coke
pkdukesnides1 8 months ago 18
@pkdukesnides1
This isn't basement weed... the money that you pay goes directly to those who don't have our best interest, or the best interest of those communities they infest... at heart.
One quick look at Juarez should open your eyes. If you don't feel the two should be lumped in together.. then perhaps your next vacation should be in Juarez.. eh?
PaleHearse 7 months ago
@PaleHearse Old saying- if you don't know your history your doomed to repeat it!! Look what happened during the prohibition of alcohol, do you know how many criminal organizations we created when we tried to make it illegal? Remember Al Capone? Same with the war on drugs, we are allowing the black market and the cartels to thrive!! you will not stop people from using drugs, just like how you can not stop people from using alcohol!! Wake up people our gov is throwing away ourr dollars!!
ridah925 6 months ago
@ridah925
The reason for the end of prohibition was quite different for the reason we ended opium dens. On that there can be no historical argument. I am a study of history, but when having this argument with pot heads it becomes rapidly clear that they don't view their drug of choice as any more dangerous then alcohol.. when it is. Now I grant you it's not but by a small margin and opium it's not.. but at some point a line has to be drawn .. and marijuana is currently that line.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse see now your giving your opinion not facts which makes your argument invalid!!! Marijuana is much safer then alcohol and if you don't believe that then you need to pull your head out of the sand and start doing some research instead of believing everything your told!!!
ridah925 6 months ago
@ridah925
You sir.. are being absurd. As I stated before.. both are very close.. but as study after study has shown, marijuana use is insidious and nearly impossible to recover from. Not nearly as easy to put down as alcohol.. though both have disastrous effects on the body. Again.. your approaching this from the position of the pot head who is trying to defend what he/she is doing by comparing it to something ELSE that's nasty. Check your science before challenging my own.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse Your so full of shit its not even funny!!! Show me links to these so called study's or else your talking out of your ass!!!!
ridah925 6 months ago
@ridah925
Trust that I've become quite used to being shouted down by pot heads that haven't thought this through.
I'm not going to waste my time posting links to things that are easily researched on your own.. should you ever put the bong down and do the research. Instead, all you will do is to try and say you want it legalized without giving that thought either. You don't want it legal like alcohol, you want it legal like caffeine or nicotine... so you have no responsibility.
Grow up.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse You fucking asshole you don't care about anyone but yourself!! This whole protectionist bs has gone to far in this country!! You don't give a damn about anyone but yourself, you want to continue filling our jails and spending money we don't have on a failed war WAKE THE FUCK UP!!! You don't get to tell people what they can or cannot put in their bodies we are not children!! I don't even smoke pot and your going off calling me a pothead shows how ignorant you really are!!
ridah925 6 months ago
@ridah925
Again.. your arguments are old. You accuse me of "not caring about anyone but myself" yet I'm not the one here who wants to smoke weed at any cost... the cost of flat out ignoring the deleterious physical and social effects of this drug... and others I'm assuming. Like I said.. make it legal.. just do it in such a way that keeps it out of the hands of kids as much as possible and make YOU responsible for the stupid things you do (or don't do.. like go to work) while your stoned.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@ridah925
On the contrary, I do have a say in who I do and do not hire and hence what you "put in your body".. Also, society DOES tell folks what they can and can not put in their body and operate a car.
I will most certainly screen out pot heads from my business.. because they are a danger to others and to themselves. If your not a child.. then don't act like one. You want to make it legal.. then be responsible for what you do... man up. Your not working for me while drunk or stoned.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@ridah925 This is not about operating vehicles or being in the workplace under the influence, obviously anyone in their right mind would agree with what you said about that. Nobody is saying do away with responsibility and morals!! Your argument is so weak, and you showed everyone how ignorant you really are!! I'm done with you don't even bother to respond!!!
ridah925 6 months ago
@ridah925 @PaleHearse Sorry for being a big butinski (troll) it just looks like the two of you got you're signals crossed, got off on the wrong foot, but acutally have the exact same view point. I also don't smoke pot, but here in Californian it's a BOOMING BUSINESS and could have solved all of our economic woes when it came on our ballot to make it recreational. I don't think Pale Hearse is against economic recovery or for sending the handicapped to prison. Just medicinal here & it WORKS!
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
Oh.. I'd not say we have the same view point... and no, taxing pot isn't going to solve CA's budget issues. All taxing pot will do is put more people in jail for tax evasion. For them, it's not about responsibility.. it's about getting high. Once we have that clear.. we're golden.
If you want economic recovery your going to have to do away with unionized entitlements for half done jobs. We also probably differ on the use of the term "medicinal".
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse Can Marijuana Help Rescue California's Economy? (Time) < google.
I've smoked pot before it didn't make me want to evade paying my taxes, I just got the munchies. Apparently that's one of it's big draws for cancer patients during chemotherapy, that and it helps alleviate pain.
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
Yup.. THC is shown to lower vascular pressure.. especially in the eye and it's proven to increase the appetite of those undergoing cancer treatment. No argument there.. it should be taken off the schedule one list.
But.. that's not what they are looking to do with so called "medical" marijuana. They.. ah.. want to smoke it.. for anxiety. They want to allow children to use it.. for concocted ADHD.. when it's shown that the remedy for that comes from self discipline alone.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse Anxiety is the number one killer in America, hyper tension.
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is cured by self discipline alone.
That's the funniest thing I've heard all day.
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
Spoken like a true pot head troll looking for his medical marijuana prescription.
I'll address your only actual point. Anxiety does not cause chronic hypertension... it is an exacerbating contributing factor. If your looking to cure your "anxiety" you might want to try something a bit less physically and mentally addictive. If it's the hypertension your trying to cure.. diet and other drugs are far more effective at managing chronic hypertension then THC is. So try again.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse I don't suffer from anything except inexcusable character assasinations.
Life can't be compartmentalized as easily as you seem to think it can be. There are many contributing factors as to how we remember information for instance, and how we develop debilitating and crippling prejudices as well. First year law school you're taught ambiguity. Some jackwagon was telling me that I was arguing to ignorance, well there are 4 options and he wasn't presenting ONE. Be open minded!
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
Open mindedness has it's limits. I am open minded when presented with points of view, but after examining the facts.. until new ones come to light.. it's acceptable to form an opinion based on what you understand to be true and can relate to others. I feel I've done that here. I do not feel that it's acceptable to continue to accept the abuse of prescriptions of smokeable marijuana. This isn't about relieving suffering.. it's about getting high.. let's get that perfectly clear.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse To whatever extent you don't take a position will be the extent that your assessment of the facts will be accurate.
Abuses do exist no doubt, but marijuana has a low incident of overdose and physical addiction, it's a hard drug to abuse. Ridah 925 made a comment about how we shouldn't have the right to control what a person ingests inside their own home especially when nothing else is at stake except THAT person. You take all of a person's liberties and life begins to suck.
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
I disagree about the physical addiction but because the drug, like alcohol, is so socially addictive.. it's hard to separate out it's physically addictive properties. Because it remains in the system, and the endocrine system adapts to the long term presence of THC... this separates it from alcohol. Alcohol is a short duration toxin that, though it has long term health effects, does not remain in the system forcing the body to adapt to it except in the case of chronic use/abuse.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse Nope, it's not physically addictive because when a person stops using they don't go through withdrawls, that's the determining factor.
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
.. do some of that research your talking about. As to the "man made compounds" in tobacco, even without those trace amounts, the amounts of natural tar alone in marijuana is staggering compared to tobacco.
Ingestion of THC via eye drops or consumption would only be considered medicinal by me and others where the amount given can be measured and it's intake monitored by a physician. Hence my persistent belief that they are out to get high..not to medicate. That covers it I think.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
Untrue on a couple points.. physical addiction isn't just craving related. For example many heart medications are physically addictive in that with their sudden removal you can get huge spikes in blood pressure because the body can no longer produce the internal chemistry to regulate the circulatory system. Similar with THC. THC goes after certain aspects of the endocrine system, for example... as well as certain aspects of the circulatory and immune system. You may need to ...
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse You can't know another's state of mind, it calls for speculation.
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
Not talking about their state of mind.. we were talking about the physical "addictive" effects of THC.. right?
THC, because it lingers in the system for 30 days or more.. continues to have a variety of effects on the body that get worse over time. The mental debilitation that occurs is harder to quantify.. but not so with the effects on the immune system and the endocrine system.
Or are you back to your absurd idea that "anxiety kills".. or is somehow untreatable by other means?
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse Hence my persistent belief that they are out to get high..not to medicate. That covers it I think < You're believing something about others states of mind, what someone is out to do and what they hope to gain from it goes to motive.
I work for a Dr. I can ask her anytime I have a question about disease and remedies. Plus each of us can do research on our own and form our own conclusions on the matter. I've cared for a number of people who have gone through withdrawl.
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
Ah.. no, not their state of mind but how they choose to have the drug delivered... so it simply an assessment ov motive based on the fact that they don't really care how much THC they are ingesting for any medicinal effect that can be monitored over time but instead so they can feel the effects of the THC.. clear as mud? So no,, not trying to get into their head that way.. just looking at evidence for motive as one would for any other crime.or passion.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse belief that they are out to get high..not to medicate. < that's clear as glass. My initial and still only response is: it's none of my business why someone gets high, it doesn't effect me. Everything is monitored in this world, the amount of active ingredients (THC) is carefully monitored. What are you thinking, the insurance compaines are telling their clients it's a "free-for-all"?
Hey Friend, maybe go back to the Baldwin/Dawkins upload and leave the doctoring to others?
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
... in marijuana today is astronomical compared to that from 20 years ago. But that's not even what I'm basing this on.. I know 2 fellows with glaucoma.. and I got a chuckle from each of them when they gave the same answer to a question posed to them.. I asked.. "Why don't you use the eye drops?"...
"The eye drops don't get you stoned.. ".. was the reply.
So no, there is a clinical difference between medical treatment and recreational use. That's not going to go away.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse They're still medicating, right? They smoke pot is their "reason" to get high, but "why" they're doing it could be a hundred different things that they're probably not even "aware" of themselves.
You're FIXATED on people getting high and why. There's probably a "reason" and "why" you are, but again I don't think you know yourself well enough to articulate it to me, and once you did, your state of mind is temporary so it might change before you even finished writing, see?
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
What I suppose I'm "fixated" on.. is that I don't much care for disingenuous people and liars. If you want to do something.. then don't hide behind a medical use excuse. Take responsibility for what you want to do.. defend what you want to do as best you can.. and then do it in a responsible way. You accused me of not "being in their head".. I simply pointed out situations where folks could medicate using THC and monitor the clinical intake.. but choose not to.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
Oh.. and to address where your dancing around my point so you don't have to address it.. I'll sharpen the stick and poke again.
No, in MOST medical marijuana cases in CA they are NOT medicating anything. It's just a legal way to grow it and obtain it so they can get stoned.
That's the basic issue here between actual clinical use of THC.. and smoking pot.
Nice dancing shoes though.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse wrote No, in MOST medical marijuana cases in CA they are NOT medicating anything.
Sure they are, that's why it's called medicine and you have to go see a Dr. and get a prescription for it. Do you know what presumption means? What about the presumption of innocence? I, like all Americans, have divine inalienable rights against anyone that interrupts unjustly my pursuit of happiness, my liberty, or my free will choices. The issue here is presumption of innocence not guilt.
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
You are obviously not in California.
Here.. my friend.. are your poster children for my social position on this issue.
watch?v=d2kzFFWPT3o
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@shizzleman8
While I do agree about what you pointed out in the erosion of our liberties, legalizing marijuana smoking without applying the appropriate responsibilities on it's use isn't going to fly with me. It's not tobacco or an energy drink. Are folks willing to go to jail for a DUI or "open container" for having pot unsecured in their car?
Are they willing to have CPS come for their kids because their kids have been repeatedly caught smoking or because they have pot accessible to them?
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@PaleHearse Actually it is a tobacco that's why the preferred delivery system today is a vaporizer or ingestion through brownies or other food type products. Nicotine cigarettes have a number of "man made" drug additives that marijuana doesn't.
Anything you want to know can be found on the internet. Just from experience alone in California I'm not aware of anyone ever cited for just pot. In Arizona I had a girlfriend who got 2 years for a roach (small insignifican't amount, a cig. butt)
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8 You are mistaken.
ridah925 6 months ago
@ridah925 Could you be a tad more specific?
shizzleman8 6 months ago
@shizzleman8 You said we had the same point of view and I said your mistaken NEGATIVE!!
ridah925 6 months ago
@ridah925 Jude is Patron Saint of lost causes, I'm not him but it looks like palehearse is opening up and I'm finding more agreement all the time. I was the number one salesman for the number one dealership of Mobile homes in the State of California one year. You have to find things to agree on and work out the details later. I don't see one real point where you two disagree and a half a dozen where you do. I followed him to this page and he's an atheist and I'm a Pentecostal, we're talking!
shizzleman8 6 months ago
Respond to this video...
OH.. and in closing with that thought..
I personally would have no issue legalizing all drugs.. IF... and this is a VERY important IF..
IF.. it was a capital offense, or at the very least pre meditated murder to kill another person while under the influence of any drug, and IF there were NO publicly funded programs for drug addiction.
It's critical that should legalization ever occur, there would have to apply with it a social responsibility and remedy.
PaleHearse 6 months ago
@pkdukesnides1 right with you on that one. ridiculous.
suicidebag666 5 months ago
"major drugs" had me clickin'
OverlyExcitedNewJack 8 months ago
get on the ground. . .hmm i spy dumbasses
clint10134 9 months ago 5
@clint10134 hey said "get on the deck" right after, probably because he realised how stupid it sounds when you're floating on water.
ontariobuds 3 months ago
@clint10134 What would you want them to do instead?
specops1991 2 months ago
@CaptainAAllen watch "cocaine cowboys 2". our government is beyond bullshit.
GoesByUnknown 9 months ago
@GoesByUnknown great movie!
deadkennedys909 9 months ago
@CaptainAAllen are you serious? take a closer look at our government. Watch some videos about it, our gov sucks lolz
GoesByUnknown 9 months ago
Someone watching this video might get the idea that their government is trying to stop drugs from entering the country, when in reality, the people who control the government are the same ones who control the drug trade.
AnotherGlenn 9 months ago
Who you gonna call? Coke busters!!
JRock005 9 months ago
Time for Stinger missles...we are losing the fight Favela!!! Modern Warfare 2
deltaalphaone1 9 months ago
@deltaalphaone1 youre so gay...
jumpthenoob 9 months ago
@jumpthenoob I know I get your little filthy Stoners>>> getting pawned in COD MW2---HA HA HA
deltaalphaone1 9 months ago
weed isn't a drug
kidbsh121 9 months ago
what right do they have do they have to fire on a ship in international waters. There is nothing illegal about running around with a boat full of cocaine in international waters. It's the same principal that makes gambling booze cruises out of south florida legal. Gambling boat cruises out to international water and boom they are free to gamble.
matt9822 10 months ago
@matt9822 wanna tell that to the prez? im sure he totally agrees with you. stop being ingnorant and get your facts straight before posting.
thebigplop 9 months ago
@matt9822 They were in US waters. Even if they arn't; if they were heading towards US waters any sovereign nation can stop them before they enter their waters. But they would only do that for miltiray or last resort type of reasons were lives are at risk (i.e. if a russian sub got clsoe during the cold war it would ahve been blown up before it got in US waters) in this situation they probably waited until they got in the US in order for the evidence to be admissable.
Kmagnus80 9 months ago
fish are getting high tonight!
111foxbat 10 months ago
they ran into the world most dangerous coastline gang, LOL
shaochiavang 10 months ago
better get my scuba gear on and find those bricks :)
xxadoxx521 11 months ago
wtf man the gov gets to do all that shit but if we light on fire the fucking epa's on ass danmit bichtes go to hell
zigafloma 11 months ago
"GET ON THE GROUND! Er... I mean GET ON THE DECK!"
FierySockHat 11 months ago
wow were they even in united states water and they opened fire on an unarmed vessel i meanwho gives a crap if a couple idiots get high,and to add to that they actually hit the vessel then they vandallized private property by setting the boat on fire and shooting at it doesnt our gov't have anything better t do and do any of you people realize how much these boats cost
MultiLeon333 11 months ago
@MultiLeon333 well if you think about once they get out they'll go back to smuggling and by a brand new one that is probually better... but i do agree that it was dumb to destroy the boat
The02polaris 11 months ago
@MultiLeon333 dude there were 2 tons of cocaine on that boat
FierySockHat 11 months ago
8 crackheads voted this vid down
SupremeAmerican 1 year ago
yep
macarreti 1 year ago
Who you going to call coke busters, I hope we got killed latter on in the line of duty.
Beatnick79 1 year ago
all tht weed wasted roflll
BosiayaB 1 year ago
Stop illegal drug smugglers!
The US Government doesnt like competition.
shwantz3 1 year ago
@shwantz3 Yeah, same with stealing and murdering!
112namrepus 1 year ago
hookypooky, 2lbs? You mean 2 tons moron. And would you had rather they set it adrift, letting it become a hazard to nav? Burning it burned off the fuel onboard and I can't bet you a nod that they removed the barrels of fuel before setting it onfire. Unless you were there, best to sit back and keep your mouth shut and just enjoy the show..
tc1uscg 1 year ago
and all 2 lbs were turned in
hookuspookus529 1 year ago
I'm not going to fish in that area!!
crabber59 1 year ago
imagine finding a bag of weed washed up at ur local beach...
Mokuliwah 1 year ago
stupid people going out on the cover of darkness you have to be dumb, there always patroling... ;S
L00tUpFAty 1 year ago
good job you got the dugs. But poluted the waters and air with toxins lol.
Lesnification 1 year ago
i cant wait to join the coast gaurd!
MrBrownns 1 year ago
daaaaaaaaam...
ltuomela 1 year ago
if that was the taliban on that boat they would have shot at the coast guard they wouldnt have cared if they died but some of those coast guard fags would have cAme with them
UpInSmokeeee 1 year ago
What? They behave that the 120 m $ drugs belong to these guy on the boat??!!!!
ZippoZappata 1 year ago
nice environmentally sounds way to dispose of the boat. Shoot it up with heavy caliber rounds and watch the fuel and oil leak into the water.
M3hammerdown 1 year ago
@M3hammerdown - You expected them to save a boat that was already sinking? That single boat wasn't carrying that much fuel and oil as it is. Nothing in comparison to an offshore rig or a cruise ship. Not to mention once the boat reaches the bottom it may provide a little shelter for fish, although it was a relatively small boat.
7rak3r 1 year ago
Google Drugsnot4medotca it's a website where it tells you real facts and commericals how to say no to drugs and how to make wiser decisions
MyUTubeAccount02 1 year ago
wonder if they thought about marpol when sinking the boat..... of course they wont get in trouble for it....
Samgtho 1 year ago
should have hit it with the 76... before you caught them
FTWMikeDero 1 year ago
ya and if our boats go down we have to pay thousands to have them salvaged and they just let them sink
mow4cash 1 year ago
They would have to kill me if they wanted it. Your life is over anyway. Cut open a bail shove your face in it and sniff as hard as you can a couple times before you start spraying them with bullets. Plain a simple. If you don't want your life to end simply don't do it for a living.
Beefer413 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
holy poluting the water fking cops
DanielMikmaq 1 year ago
holy poluting the water fucking cops
DanielMikmaq 1 year ago
i wanna know how many miles they were from the coastline
CreazioniPinnacolo 1 year ago
coastguards have guns?
yourdumbanyway1 1 year ago
Seen this many years ago, never gets old to watch
tbsdrummer87 1 year ago
theyre just "runners" the kingpins are watching this at home laughing saying "thats just good t.v."
Hot80s 1 year ago
Come on guys, you know the reason the government and police stop drug dealers is cause if the general population had drugs everybody would stop working and we'd all be worthless and dying.
SmitHolm 1 year ago
@SmitHolm exactly. good point
tbsdrummer87 1 year ago
@SmitHolm We're all dying anyway.
DKz92 1 year ago
I thought it was pretty funny when that coast guard guy is stupid and says get down on the ground...then he changes what he says to get down on the deck. Lol there is no ground there. There is definately a deck though.
triezen007 1 year ago
=]~
Electroh0lic 1 year ago
isnt it funny that you get 15 years for dealing mary jane but only 8 for rape
josh131987 1 year ago
@josh131987 Let's go rape some cunts!
The laws are bullshit here too in Australia, a 9 year old can legally own a shotgun, but you have to over 18 to buy spray paint? It kind of sends a message of what the government supports: We don't want kids writing on walls, that'd be horrible! but we'll give a small child a fucking shotgun!
wekwafe 1 year ago
Well done US coast guards, you's are worth you'r weight in GOLD!!!!!
JONBHOY1957 1 year ago
top 2 comments wont talk when their kids are hooked on tht shit
oreolover345 1 year ago
F*ck the goverment
if i was some coast gard i would get the marihuana myself and not waste those huge amounts of cash
they could be rich if they where smart
dumbasses
Ramon7948 1 year ago
why didnt they just throw those grass into sea while they're escaping? dummbbb
Mat7Sohai 1 year ago
coke busters^^ lol
MrWraith3001 1 year ago
exactly why you need an inboard, and some decoy outboards
MparishFsu 1 year ago
why the fuck wouldnt they have a submarine?
guitardude99999 1 year ago
@guitardude99999 They do. The DEA just found another one deep in the jungle of Columbia.
Jackle61 1 year ago
They said get on the ground? WTF there on water!
dcool96 1 year ago
what show is this?
spencer123123123 1 year ago
How about sinking the coastguard boat for carrying drugs and piracy on the high seas.
grancito2 1 year ago
WTF!
if you had 120Million Dollars worth of Cocaine!
i would fucking buy a Submarine! :D
BKsMassive 1 year ago
they couldnt take the engines b4 they burned it? =[
mipkay 1 year ago
thats me behind the wheel smoking a big spliff screaming fuck the cops amigo
MrTommyRico 1 year ago
such an insane approach to the drug problem...like trying to sweep up the ocean with a broom and dustpan.
rabiddog314 1 year ago
there are gonna be some highhhh fish
veigalane 1 year ago
is burning boats good for enviroment ??
q8yba7t 1 year ago
All that drug money this must be years and years agao cause in 2010 they would be sniping Blackhawks with RPGs and .50 cal Barret rifles I would AHHHHH!
CBAsystems 1 year ago
@CBAsystems
Your boat would be blown apart by deck gun fire.
godlessmaximus 1 year ago
@godlessmaximus yes>>> I think you are right ...
CBAsystems 1 year ago
if they have 200 million to spend on drugs why not buy a submarine haha
buzbee1991 1 year ago
feel sorry for the guys who get busted as there not big time dealers,but i wonder what the cartels do when there boat dont reach usa? do they just call it a loss? or would there familys pay by death for it?? i mean if its not on video like this one how do the cartels tell if they got robbed or busted??
manxdude1 1 year ago
"Who yah gonna call? Coke busters."
a2n2queen 1 year ago
I love the decision to light it on fire???? wtf
Lastwordismine 1 year ago
What a waste of a nice boat. I would have loved to own something like that.
filtrete867 1 year ago
legalize all druggggggggggs
NeeKroVal 1 year ago
FUCK THE POLICE!
asheriscool0 1 year ago
I love how they celebrated when they caught the coke smugglers but noone even smiled when they got all the chronic
LOLOLOLLOLOLOL
nobrain132 1 year ago
wha happened to mah 280mm nuclear warheads? and mah 800mm dora gun??? meh...me sad now...
BSA305 1 year ago
Nice shooting, Tex. Any other country on earth would have blown that boat to smithereens. With the smugglers in it. Problem solved - they won't do it again.
NauiBitchtl 1 year ago
Good job coast guard, thanks for polluting the water by lighting a boat on fire, you're as bad as BP. WTF does it matter anyways? Everyone in the world does drugs, whether it be caffeine, tobacco, alcohol, pain killers, pot, coke, etc. They are fighting a never ending war on drugs, and for what reason? Making stuff illegal is not going to stop anything. People are going to get what they want no matter what. Instead of wasting good drugs why don't you geniuses standardize and legalize?
yellowpony302 1 year ago 5
@yellowpony302 im not trying to be a nature freak but the boat will help with parasite homes and stuff to... and they should legalize it to
The02polaris 11 months ago
@yellowpony302 he said to..."get on the ground"..? lol!!!
drumminghunter 11 months ago
@yellowpony302 fighting against drugs creates more jobs than legalizing otherwise i think it would be legal, in the end everything is about business, even though drugs would be such a big business fighting it creates more jobs
drewsterm7 10 months ago
@drewsterm7
Those jobs are paid for with tax money though. If those drugs where legally regulated and sold by buisnesses, it would create a arguably equivalant amount of jobs as the DEA does. And they would bring in billions in annual tax revenue.
The DEA and police isn't a business though, and it sucks up tax money pointlessly trying to do something thats impossible.
We spend over 90 billion in tax dollars every year uselessly trying to "eliminate drugs". It doesn't work.
JenkemBOMBS 10 months ago