• His Holiness The 14th Dalai Lama is concerned about the freedom, peace and happiness of the six million Tibetan people.
• His Holiness The Dalai Lama is concerned about the future of the most precious, profound culture in the world, which preserves the entire teaching of the Buddha: the Lesser Vehicle, and the Great Vehicle, Sutra and Secret Mantra.
• Even though some evil beings criticize His Holiness,unlike common people and even other religious leaders, He only benefits them in return.
What a crap of video... they not even know what they are talking about!!! well, ok, the quality of life in tibet never was perfect, BUT... at least before they are free to have their own culture.
Now, they have a awful quality of life and don't have any freedom!
And, wow, there is no need to offend the chinese.
There is a loooot of contries that do these kind of things!.... Yeah... USA is on the Iraque to 'save the poor iraquians'... Right!!!! They don't want the oil, of course...! ¬¬
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn I'm sorry, stupid are you, who don't understand my point.
-.- Where I say that dalai lama was a good guy or that the resistence was a peace one? I think you need glasses, sir.
I was talking about the hipocrisy to try to show that 'China was there to save then from the bad dictador', when themselves just wanted power and lands, and put a dictatory state and restringe the tibet culture. I don't think any of them are in their right, but try to glorify China, that is a bit too much
That China just wanted power and lands? Are you serious? Have you read a thing about the historic context?
Tibet was a isolated nation discover in the end of XIX century, it was a race of China X England to get more lands. Do you really think that the tibetan people WANTED to be invade, and the chinese wanted do SAVE them? How naive can you be? -.-
I'm not saying that the before government was a good one, but the posture of the video is hipocryte.
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn 'Invade' in ''? Nowdays, Tibet still has to obey China's command and pay taxes to China, don't know why the '', they invade and still control the country -.-'
And, oh, you are repeating what I say in my first commentary, but I think you just bother to read/see what you wanted to . Quote:''And, wow, there is no need to offend the chinese. There is a loooot of contries that do these kind of things!.''
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn But I still think this vid is crap, not because I support the previous leader, but because it 'paints' the Chinese domination as a benefical one, and, as you said "i don't know if china made the quality of life great there". They don't.
What I'm oppose is to the cultural and social restrition that China impose upon Tibet.
But, I don't know where in my comments did a showed support to previous govermment... I think I must be blind, or is you that have a visual ability that I lack?
@Natketty you don't know that, unless you've been there
not look at the lying BBC CNN news ( i live in thailand and they made news here about the Red Shirt protest and it's all bullshit, our previous PM paid them to say those things)
how do you know China doesn't allow socializing in Tibet?
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn It's not only CNN news, but ONU data and others data organs shows that the situation in Tibet is still precary (before was bad as well, but if you READ my comments, will see that I don't approved the previous government, but this doesn't make me aprove the China one, and that is the point I'm making since my first post -.-).
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn China doesn't allow a lot of cultural activities from tibetan people, China IMPOSE his own system of government changing all the structure of Tibet, every political and social decision MUST be approved beforehand by chinese leaders before being applied in Tibet. This is what 'social and cultural' restrition is.
And by the way, this rules over the 'anexed states' in China cause another 3-4 etinical conflicts well documented in China, so YES, there is proves that China does that.
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn Second: China thinks that Tibet is part of china... But as well thinks that Taiwan is part of China, despite the fact that Taiwan is consider by the international community as a independent country. China thinks the same about Cazaquistan and Quirquizia. China thinks that because of it's 'hitorical right' to dominate these lands, because some centurys ago the China empire dominated these lands. I can't see a poorly argument than 'oh, my ancestors dominate these lands, so i will'.
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn Proves that China thinks that these countries are his?
Until today, China doesn't reconized the independece of Taiwan and see it as a 'rebel state', despite the fact of the international community seeing Taiwan as a independent country. Can't be clearer than that.
About cazaquistan, China still has a hostile politic against it, and some individual political pronouncements shows that China still see it as 'rebel state' as well.
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn By your argument of 'historical rights' and 'cultural similarities', Well... this was Hitler argument as well to conquer the Europe. This was Saddam argument in Asia.
By that argument, it would be ok to Russia now invade Ukraine and use the argument 'historical right and cultural similarities', and say that 'it would be one nation', but this phrase wouldn't make it all go right.
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn Third: This hasn't nothing to do with communism, my criticism is about IMPERIALISM, not communism. And, even so, nowdays you can't say China is communist, China has a bi-polar government that is communist in politics and capitalist in economy.
Others ethnic conflicts nowdays - uighurs(Xinjiang), manchur (Manchuria), mongol (Inner Mongolia), Taiwan (political issue - China doesn't reconize it's independence) Here yours 3-4 other major ethnic conflicts.
@Natketty The changes are needed to be inspected by their leaders IS communism, everything under 1 control
They adapted to survive in a world with capitalist, that's just immature insulting, you're saying an office full of retards managed to make China powerful and beable to feed themselves?
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn Imature insulting?? -.-' Saying that they are a bi-polar government, how is that a insult? It is not a insult, it is the world wide DEFINITION of the nowdays goverment of China, defined by geografers an social sciences experts.
But the FACT that China does not fit in the DEFINITION of a communist country is not a bad or a good thing, don't misinterpret (AGAIN ¬¬) what I say. Where did I say, or even imply, that this was bad?
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn And one more thing, stop trying to imply that I am a 'anti-communism', I didn't say a thing that can be interpreted in this way.
I am agains Imperialism, censorship, cultural repression. Even so some communists states have this characteristics, I didn't link then in any moment in my comments.
But, as I say, China IS a bipolar state, not by my definition, but by the specialists nowdays, you can look in the net or em geo books and you will find ^~
@Natketty How are those other ethnic conflicts? I don't see how Mongols hate the PRC due to the fact that the former Mongol goverment even starting an alliance with China(and in that case, Russia), same with Manchus (Not that they started an alliance, but I don't see any protest/uprising)
Taiwan's ethnicy are FULL of Han Chinese (98 percent according to their office of information website)
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn About Taiwan, didn't you read the comment I say that this was a POLITICAL issue, just for you don't have the trouble to say that 'Oh, blablabla, this is not ethinical'. But I guess, AGAIN, you don't bother to read carefully.
About mongols and manchus, there is separatist movements of part of the population, not so expressive in mongol, but with expression in the manchur.
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn Cazaquistan, ~17 years ago, was part of China territory, but was able to get independence.
China tried to get the country back, but insurations in Manchuria and in Inner Mongolia, that also tried to get independence, get more Chinas atention.
Until today, there is still many separatists groups in Manchuria and some Inner mongolia (both ethnical conflicts), and many political prisioners.
@Natketty and what are they suppose to do huh?are they suppose to say "WE INVADE TIBET FOR LAND AND POWER!!!! NOT SAVE THE CIVILIANS!!!!" every goverment is like this, so dont hate chinese goverment, hate humanity
In 1987, The Dalai Lama advocated that Tibet should not become independent, but that it should be given meaningful autonomy within the People's Republic of China. This approach is known as the "Middle Way". The Dalai Lama has held firm to this but China just keeps labeling him a Separatist because they dont want to settle anything with The Dalai Lama or The Tibetans.
New New World Order 国際連盟SAGEテーマソング「ピース・オブ・ザ・ワールド」♪ KAZUKI&SIZUKU ♪ United Nations SAGE Theme Song「Peace of the World」・(KAZUKI)2009年 国連ユネスコ世界遺産音楽祭エグゼグティブプロデューサー
For those of you who believe the Dalai Lama is only going to "BE A SPIRTUAL LEADER", you guys are more gullible and idiotic than i ever thot you could be... Check out your Tibetan history... The leader of the nation has ALWAYS BEEN a Dalai Lama... They are dictated thru their religious principles to select a leader.
if Tibet get autonomy at this time the current Dalai Lama will be leader of Tibet for a few decades thereafter a new Dalai Lama from a different family will become spiritual mentor of Tibet you stupid fool know the real facts
dalai lama has said he will not be a leader in genuine autonomy Tibet, he will remain a spiritual leader, know your points completely before accusing.
who can say there is a obsolutly free? you can do whatever you want? if it is simple as the some people thin, There woun't be Iraq war,Vienam War and Korea War.
What's the conecept of free Tibat mean? does it mean that Tibet should be ruled by Dalai Lama again?
By the time when Dalai Lama fled to India in 1959, Tibet is a slavery society, Lama the monks and Tibetan aristcrat class own those slaves. the slaves can be used to be skinned for religious practicing,body parts and bones used as religious appliances as human remain made appliances were belived to be more functional than other material.
everybody can say what ever want, but how many can see in thair hearts and feel freedom and peacefull. who can say that is totaly free? can you live without judge? think about this and let the love make you better
okay , don't you think its fishy that MOST of the pro-chinese gov anti-tibetains. JUST created an account today or in the past few days????? I SMELL GOVERNMENTS DOGS at work.
THis is obvious Chinese gov. PROPAGANDA like :osaishadddl, passusa2008, uuu07, vioceoftibet, pengju1988, NEWLIFECHINA robertsun9098 bigchinadoll ,inmynotsoho ,TiananmenKiller.AND MANNY MORE ...LOOK FOR YOURSELF... and who the hell copies paste the same thing over and over again for 5 hours straight???? Obvious Propaganda
I don't know what your motivation is to make such a video. However, judging by you superficiaility in content and comments, I can only say, may your soul rest in peace. I hope you can sleep in peace and be able to see in the eyes of your family.
Chinese army intelligence reports admit that the PLA killed 87,000 members of the Tibetan resistance in Lhasa and surrounding areas between March and October 1959 alone. [Xizang Xingshi he Renwu Jiaoyu de Jiben Jiaocai, PLA Military District's Political Report, 1960]
Yes, in the war and reformation some Tibetans are killed, but they are all the slaveholders ( Monks ) and their soldiers of old Tibet. Before 1950 the number of slaveholders to slaves is 1 : 5, so you can calculate how many evil slaveholders were in Tibet. Dalai Lama is the leader of all the brutal slaveholders in Tibet. He should also have been punished ! ! !
Guinness Book of World Records: Although nowadays they don't come right out and declare Mao Zedong to be the Top Dog in the Mass Killings category, earlier editions (such as 1978) did:
- On 7 Apr 1969 the Soviet government radio reported that 26.3 mil people were killed in China, 1949-65
- In April 1971 the cabinet of the government of Taiwan reported 39.94 mil deaths for the years 1949-69
- The Walker Report: between 32.25 mil and 61.7 mil
Tom Grunfeld never went to Tibet until after his book was published. Anna Louise Strong -- a diehard Marxist -- was given a tightly monitored Chinese government tour of Lhasa and then went on to proclaim that "a million Tibetan serfs have stood up! They are burying the old serfdom and building a new tomorrow!" One might say that one doesn't need to go to Paris to know the Eiffel tower exists.
"Scholars" like Parenti and Grunfeld and Strong, with limited source material and no firsthand experience, see old Tibet as a horrible place; but the bottom line is they're not Tibetan. And if Tibetans themselves don't see their past as a past of feudal lords and merciless repression, then do they really need "scholars" like Parenti to tell them what their past is all about?
Parenti's thesis that summarizes how completely disconnected he is from any kind of Tibetan reality. In his thesis, he states that old Tibet was a society that was 'damaging to the human spirit.' Any person who has spent any time with the Tibetan people would laugh at the irony.
Mankind is naturally sinful and falls in pursuing goodness. People will be people, Chinese, Tibetan, American, whatever. We're all evil without God's guidance.
Everyone should watch this video...Dalai Lama himself was a dictator, the leader of all slave masters....now he is acting like a peaceful monk????give me a break!
• His Holiness The 14th Dalai Lama is concerned about the freedom, peace and happiness of the six million Tibetan people.
• His Holiness The Dalai Lama is concerned about the future of the most precious, profound culture in the world, which preserves the entire teaching of the Buddha: the Lesser Vehicle, and the Great Vehicle, Sutra and Secret Mantra.
• Even though some evil beings criticize His Holiness,unlike common people and even other religious leaders, He only benefits them in return.
dorje168 1 year ago 5
His Holiness the Dalai Lama is Tibet!
Spiritually Tibet belongs to the Tibetans!
China Invaded and Stole the Tibetans’ Land!
But China Will Never Conquer the Tibetan People!
Tibetans will always be Tibetans in their Hearts!
China can pretend that the physical Tibet belongs to them!
Deep down the Tibetans Will Never Accept Chinese Rule!
• Long Live His Holiness The 14th Dalai Lama.!
dorje168 1 year ago 6
DALAI LAMA EVIL BASTARD HE MUST DIE
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
What a crap of video... they not even know what they are talking about!!! well, ok, the quality of life in tibet never was perfect, BUT... at least before they are free to have their own culture.
Now, they have a awful quality of life and don't have any freedom!
And, wow, there is no need to offend the chinese.
There is a loooot of contries that do these kind of things!.... Yeah... USA is on the Iraque to 'save the poor iraquians'... Right!!!! They don't want the oil, of course...! ¬¬
Natketty 2 years ago
@Natketty are you stupid, THIS ARE SLAVES under the Dalai Lama rule SLAVES
do you see any slaves in Tibet now that china come in?
and tibetan resistant fuckers set fire on 5 chinese workers (1 was a tibet) YOU CALL THAT PEACE RESISTANT?????
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn I'm sorry, stupid are you, who don't understand my point.
-.- Where I say that dalai lama was a good guy or that the resistence was a peace one? I think you need glasses, sir.
I was talking about the hipocrisy to try to show that 'China was there to save then from the bad dictador', when themselves just wanted power and lands, and put a dictatory state and restringe the tibet culture. I don't think any of them are in their right, but try to glorify China, that is a bit too much
Natketty 1 year ago
@Natketty ok i misunderstood
how do you know that, have you been to tibet?
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn How do I know wich part? -.-
That China just wanted power and lands? Are you serious? Have you read a thing about the historic context?
Tibet was a isolated nation discover in the end of XIX century, it was a race of China X England to get more lands. Do you really think that the tibetan people WANTED to be invade, and the chinese wanted do SAVE them? How naive can you be? -.-
I'm not saying that the before government was a good one, but the posture of the video is hipocryte.
Natketty 1 year ago
@Natketty you misunderstand me, i did not say china should invade tibet
i am saying that are the tibetans miserable?
china "invaded" tibet and freed it from it's slavery
i don't know if china made the quality of life great there, but i'm sure that they DID save them from their evil dictator
no goverment wants to "save" otther people, it's always about benefit so no i don't believe that
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn 'Invade' in ''? Nowdays, Tibet still has to obey China's command and pay taxes to China, don't know why the '', they invade and still control the country -.-'
And, oh, you are repeating what I say in my first commentary, but I think you just bother to read/see what you wanted to . Quote:''And, wow, there is no need to offend the chinese. There is a loooot of contries that do these kind of things!.''
Natketty 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn But I still think this vid is crap, not because I support the previous leader, but because it 'paints' the Chinese domination as a benefical one, and, as you said "i don't know if china made the quality of life great there". They don't.
What I'm oppose is to the cultural and social restrition that China impose upon Tibet.
But, I don't know where in my comments did a showed support to previous govermment... I think I must be blind, or is you that have a visual ability that I lack?
Natketty 1 year ago
@Natketty you don't know that, unless you've been there
not look at the lying BBC CNN news ( i live in thailand and they made news here about the Red Shirt protest and it's all bullshit, our previous PM paid them to say those things)
how do you know China doesn't allow socializing in Tibet?
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn It's not only CNN news, but ONU data and others data organs shows that the situation in Tibet is still precary (before was bad as well, but if you READ my comments, will see that I don't approved the previous government, but this doesn't make me aprove the China one, and that is the point I'm making since my first post -.-).
Natketty 1 year ago
@Natketty what goverment is better than huh? their own? your goverment?
????
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn China doesn't allow a lot of cultural activities from tibetan people, China IMPOSE his own system of government changing all the structure of Tibet, every political and social decision MUST be approved beforehand by chinese leaders before being applied in Tibet. This is what 'social and cultural' restrition is.
And by the way, this rules over the 'anexed states' in China cause another 3-4 etinical conflicts well documented in China, so YES, there is proves that China does that.
Natketty 1 year ago
@Natketty china believes tibet IS a part of china (doesn't mean i do)
since they were historically friendly with each other (due to the chinese thinking it's a holy land with all of the monks and such)
and that's just communism, it isn't really badder than capitalism
3-4 other etinical conflicts? i know this tibet and uighurs (which is the only one conflict i admit is very bad of china to do) and what else
it's still better than Dalai Lama
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn Second: China thinks that Tibet is part of china... But as well thinks that Taiwan is part of China, despite the fact that Taiwan is consider by the international community as a independent country. China thinks the same about Cazaquistan and Quirquizia. China thinks that because of it's 'hitorical right' to dominate these lands, because some centurys ago the China empire dominated these lands. I can't see a poorly argument than 'oh, my ancestors dominate these lands, so i will'.
Natketty 1 year ago
@Natketty
The argument is not poor, it's based on culture, you live in Brazil, you are not in Asia, it is different in Asia
Do you have any proof that China made a statement that think that these Cities/countries belong to China?
These "historical rights" are somewhat right, based on culture, it's different in Asia
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn Proves that China thinks that these countries are his?
Until today, China doesn't reconized the independece of Taiwan and see it as a 'rebel state', despite the fact of the international community seeing Taiwan as a independent country. Can't be clearer than that.
About cazaquistan, China still has a hostile politic against it, and some individual political pronouncements shows that China still see it as 'rebel state' as well.
Natketty 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn By your argument of 'historical rights' and 'cultural similarities', Well... this was Hitler argument as well to conquer the Europe. This was Saddam argument in Asia.
By that argument, it would be ok to Russia now invade Ukraine and use the argument 'historical right and cultural similarities', and say that 'it would be one nation', but this phrase wouldn't make it all go right.
Natketty 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn Third: This hasn't nothing to do with communism, my criticism is about IMPERIALISM, not communism. And, even so, nowdays you can't say China is communist, China has a bi-polar government that is communist in politics and capitalist in economy.
Others ethnic conflicts nowdays - uighurs(Xinjiang), manchur (Manchuria), mongol (Inner Mongolia), Taiwan (political issue - China doesn't reconize it's independence) Here yours 3-4 other major ethnic conflicts.
Natketty 1 year ago
@Natketty The changes are needed to be inspected by their leaders IS communism, everything under 1 control
They adapted to survive in a world with capitalist, that's just immature insulting, you're saying an office full of retards managed to make China powerful and beable to feed themselves?
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn Imature insulting?? -.-' Saying that they are a bi-polar government, how is that a insult? It is not a insult, it is the world wide DEFINITION of the nowdays goverment of China, defined by geografers an social sciences experts.
But the FACT that China does not fit in the DEFINITION of a communist country is not a bad or a good thing, don't misinterpret (AGAIN ¬¬) what I say. Where did I say, or even imply, that this was bad?
Natketty 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn And one more thing, stop trying to imply that I am a 'anti-communism', I didn't say a thing that can be interpreted in this way.
I am agains Imperialism, censorship, cultural repression. Even so some communists states have this characteristics, I didn't link then in any moment in my comments.
But, as I say, China IS a bipolar state, not by my definition, but by the specialists nowdays, you can look in the net or em geo books and you will find ^~
Natketty 1 year ago
@Natketty How are those other ethnic conflicts? I don't see how Mongols hate the PRC due to the fact that the former Mongol goverment even starting an alliance with China(and in that case, Russia), same with Manchus (Not that they started an alliance, but I don't see any protest/uprising)
Taiwan's ethnicy are FULL of Han Chinese (98 percent according to their office of information website)
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn About Taiwan, didn't you read the comment I say that this was a POLITICAL issue, just for you don't have the trouble to say that 'Oh, blablabla, this is not ethinical'. But I guess, AGAIN, you don't bother to read carefully.
About mongols and manchus, there is separatist movements of part of the population, not so expressive in mongol, but with expression in the manchur.
Natketty 1 year ago
@Natketty + What is Cazaquistan and the other city you said? I don't know what are they
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
@ShAdOwViRuSiAn Cazaquistan, ~17 years ago, was part of China territory, but was able to get independence.
China tried to get the country back, but insurations in Manchuria and in Inner Mongolia, that also tried to get independence, get more Chinas atention.
Until today, there is still many separatists groups in Manchuria and some Inner mongolia (both ethnical conflicts), and many political prisioners.
Natketty 1 year ago
@Natketty and what are they suppose to do huh?are they suppose to say "WE INVADE TIBET FOR LAND AND POWER!!!! NOT SAVE THE CIVILIANS!!!!" every goverment is like this, so dont hate chinese goverment, hate humanity
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In 1987, The Dalai Lama advocated that Tibet should not become independent, but that it should be given meaningful autonomy within the People's Republic of China. This approach is known as the "Middle Way". The Dalai Lama has held firm to this but China just keeps labeling him a Separatist because they dont want to settle anything with The Dalai Lama or The Tibetans.
dorje168 2 years ago
PS: who says that running water and electricity make life better???
Natalie167 2 years ago
not true...
Natalie167 2 years ago
tibet is part of china. no thing you can do..
bingmax 2 years ago
Time is on Tibet's side...
Free Tibet
margotschenk 2 years ago
how free tibet..? just using your fucking mouth...
bingmax 2 years ago
The only things CHINKS are good in are:
- eating dogs
-murder innocent monks
-producing bad copies of western products
-getting assfucked by their own government
-eating dogs!
Muahahahahahahahaaaaa, Chinks are dumbasses, CRAP!
hazerles 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you.. eat shit
bingmax 2 years ago
Tibet WAS,IS,and ALWAYS WILL BE a part of China
dharamsala tbegs WAS,IS,and ALWAYS WILL BE 4 legs crawling animals.
dharamsala tbegs WAS,IS,and ALWAYS WILL BE beggars
goldenkey007 2 years ago
China WAS,IS,and ALWAYS WILL BE a DOG-EATING country full of COPY-KILLERS!
hazerles 2 years ago
hazerles
tbegs WAS,IS,and ALWAYS WILL BE a DOG shit -EATING 4 legged animals
goldenkey007 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Tibet
I LOVE Tibet
Peace of the World
Let's stop killing world all of you.
New New World Order 国際連盟SAGEテーマソング「ピース・オブ・ザ・ワールド」♪ KAZUKI&SIZUKU ♪ United Nations SAGE Theme Song「Peace of the World」・(KAZUKI)2009年 国連ユネスコ世界遺産音楽祭エグゼグティブプロデューサー
ASIA政治経済協力機構 代表中井天山
sageunr 2 years ago
Fuck the Lama.
jadoowallaonion 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow Westerners have better human rights?
Search BBC News
US soldier jailed for Iraq deaths
The US has investigated a number of cases of alleged killings in Iraq
A US soldier has been jailed for eight months after admitting playing a part in the killings of four Iraqi men in April 2007.
nojobnolife 3 years ago
For those of you who believe the Dalai Lama is only going to "BE A SPIRTUAL LEADER", you guys are more gullible and idiotic than i ever thot you could be... Check out your Tibetan history... The leader of the nation has ALWAYS BEEN a Dalai Lama... They are dictated thru their religious principles to select a leader.
Hello...
THEOCRACTIC DICTATOR!!!
123UnitedWeStand123 3 years ago 2
if Tibet get autonomy at this time the current Dalai Lama will be leader of Tibet for a few decades thereafter a new Dalai Lama from a different family will become spiritual mentor of Tibet you stupid fool know the real facts
nodalaiclique 3 years ago
dalai lama has said he will not be a leader in genuine autonomy Tibet, he will remain a spiritual leader, know your points completely before accusing.
nodalaiclique 3 years ago
two thing..
first this dalai lama you see in video is the current one..
second he already lead his believer and have done so much deed..
emptyna 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Tibet, free Tibet.
Let the lamas and nobles back.
All the lands shall they own;
All the slaves shall they exploit.
Free Tibet, free Tibet.
Free Tibet, free Tibet.
Strip children of their backpacks.
To the monasteries shall they go;
All the scriptures shall they learn.
Free Tibet, free Tibet.
bgdmxd 3 years ago
who can say there is a obsolutly free? you can do whatever you want? if it is simple as the some people thin, There woun't be Iraq war,Vienam War and Korea War.
john24091978 3 years ago
中共解放军这样子翻山越岭的去杀藏民有什么目的?
Maaguaa 3 years ago
What's the conecept of free Tibat mean? does it mean that Tibet should be ruled by Dalai Lama again?
By the time when Dalai Lama fled to India in 1959, Tibet is a slavery society, Lama the monks and Tibetan aristcrat class own those slaves. the slaves can be used to be skinned for religious practicing,body parts and bones used as religious appliances as human remain made appliances were belived to be more functional than other material.
eight95630 3 years ago
everybody can say what ever want, but how many can see in thair hearts and feel freedom and peacefull. who can say that is totaly free? can you live without judge? think about this and let the love make you better
sisskata23 3 years ago
yes, everything is PROPAGANDA . keep hiding yourself in sand. westerners are too narrow to see the truth
zhangxic 3 years ago
Free Indians,
Free America,
Free Texan,
Free Howaii,
Free California,
Free more and more
Yankees, pack up and go back Europe!
erainchen 3 years ago
Ha,ha then what are you doing living in the USA.
chairde 3 years ago
okay , don't you think its fishy that MOST of the pro-chinese gov anti-tibetains. JUST created an account today or in the past few days????? I SMELL GOVERNMENTS DOGS at work.
THis is obvious Chinese gov. PROPAGANDA like :osaishadddl, passusa2008, uuu07, vioceoftibet, pengju1988, NEWLIFECHINA robertsun9098 bigchinadoll ,inmynotsoho ,TiananmenKiller.AND MANNY MORE ...LOOK FOR YOURSELF... and who the hell copies paste the same thing over and over again for 5 hours straight???? Obvious Propaganda
onepiece2885 3 years ago 2
you should stop stalking people.
WSCP 3 years ago 2
who can tell me truth that how many human skins were made by dalai lama 50 years ago?
1stsilent3rdparty 3 years ago
I don't know what your motivation is to make such a video. However, judging by you superficiaility in content and comments, I can only say, may your soul rest in peace. I hope you can sleep in peace and be able to see in the eyes of your family.
God bless.
pemadhondup 3 years ago
Chinese army intelligence reports admit that the PLA killed 87,000 members of the Tibetan resistance in Lhasa and surrounding areas between March and October 1959 alone. [Xizang Xingshi he Renwu Jiaoyu de Jiben Jiaocai, PLA Military District's Political Report, 1960]
monsieurkevinmsia 3 years ago
Report made by Free Tibet Terrorists? lol
calebeurope02 3 years ago
Yes, in the war and reformation some Tibetans are killed, but they are all the slaveholders ( Monks ) and their soldiers of old Tibet. Before 1950 the number of slaveholders to slaves is 1 : 5, so you can calculate how many evil slaveholders were in Tibet. Dalai Lama is the leader of all the brutal slaveholders in Tibet. He should also have been punished ! ! !
newyorktenzin30 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Tibet!!! Chinese invent lies to have reason!!! True is clear, Chinese are lying!!!
abelrios1970 3 years ago
brainwashed scum
samihkoo 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
I agree Albatross!
FREE TIBET!!
The Chinese are lying!!
FREE TIBET!!
smurkledunk 3 years ago
Guinness Book of World Records: Although nowadays they don't come right out and declare Mao Zedong to be the Top Dog in the Mass Killings category, earlier editions (such as 1978) did:
- On 7 Apr 1969 the Soviet government radio reported that 26.3 mil people were killed in China, 1949-65
- In April 1971 the cabinet of the government of Taiwan reported 39.94 mil deaths for the years 1949-69
- The Walker Report: between 32.25 mil and 61.7 mil
monsieurkevinmsia 3 years ago
Tom Grunfeld never went to Tibet until after his book was published. Anna Louise Strong -- a diehard Marxist -- was given a tightly monitored Chinese government tour of Lhasa and then went on to proclaim that "a million Tibetan serfs have stood up! They are burying the old serfdom and building a new tomorrow!" One might say that one doesn't need to go to Paris to know the Eiffel tower exists.
monsieurkevinmsia 3 years ago
"Scholars" like Parenti and Grunfeld and Strong, with limited source material and no firsthand experience, see old Tibet as a horrible place; but the bottom line is they're not Tibetan. And if Tibetans themselves don't see their past as a past of feudal lords and merciless repression, then do they really need "scholars" like Parenti to tell them what their past is all about?
monsieurkevinmsia 3 years ago
Parenti's thesis that summarizes how completely disconnected he is from any kind of Tibetan reality. In his thesis, he states that old Tibet was a society that was 'damaging to the human spirit.' Any person who has spent any time with the Tibetan people would laugh at the irony.
monsieurkevinmsia 3 years ago
Very funny but true about Dalai - a hypocrite, a traitor to his religion!
Loveclassical 3 years ago
Everyone should watch this video...Dalai Lama himself was a dictator, the leader of all slave masters....now he is acting like a peaceful monk????
bigchinadoll 3 years ago
What a joke. A slave master won Nobel peace prize.
qlmjqlmj 3 years ago
Mankind is naturally sinful and falls in pursuing goodness. People will be people, Chinese, Tibetan, American, whatever. We're all evil without God's guidance.
phoenixlament8 3 years ago
the power of the money.
ego9009 3 years ago
how stupid the dala lama is!
really hate them!
sggz813 3 years ago 2
Hey! Where did my comment go?
Majik47 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Funny you should post this "unbiased" look at Tibet at this very time. How much did the Chinese government pay you for being their propaganda tool?
Majik47 3 years ago
that dalai guy is a freaking terrorist!!
mikeplbf 3 years ago 3
Dalai Lama was the leader of all slavel masters in Tibet....He is now acting like a peaceful monk...LIAR!
onegoodman66 3 years ago 3
Everyone should watch this video...Dalai Lama himself was a dictator, the leader of all slave masters....now he is acting like a peaceful monk????give me a break!
onegoodman66 3 years ago 4
铁血是保证,时间是能抹去记忆的。要不然昔日的魔鬼怎能成了你大爷!
spamliers 3 years ago 4