Added: 3 years ago
From: KtsGoldenPoker
Views: 240,786
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (233)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Is it a bluff when he had the best hand?

  • @danvonnewman

    yes

  • Comment removed

  • I MISS FULL TILT :(

  • to everyone saying that he should have done this or that was a bad call or whatever....shut your stupid mouth cuz noone cares and your not a poker pro, facebook poker doesnt count u idiot, u werent there so u cant say shit...that is all.

  • We are watching some poker here... NO SHIT

  • Poetry in motion... that was beautiful.

  • Poker is for people with 'small man syndrome' who can't play actual sport. Put on a pair of shades and think they're a tough guy.

  • Comment removed

  • @Hoc8687 tough guy

  • @Hoc8687 IVEY DON'T WEAR SHADES BRO

  • Jacson couldn't go all-in because he couldn't risk being called by Ivey with a 4 to 1 chip lead and possible straight draw like 89 or 10 9. Jackson would then be risking two ways to lose instead of just the one (by folding to Ivey). That's why Ivey pushed is because he is good enough to figure that out when he asked himself "Why didn't he just push all-in, ahhh because he's drawing low. All-in."

  • ivey's poker face is outstanding. he wouldn't even cry at his daughters wedding.

  • WHAT THE FUCK WHY ARE THAY BINGO BRAND OF POKER

  • Hey guys If you want 50$ free on one of the major poker rooms of your choice message me and you just have to pass a quiz based on simple poker(it's about 20 questions), nothing hidden everything is straight forward, they are partnered with a bunch of major poker rooms, just send me a message and I can give you the link and if you have any questions I can answer them, I'm only doing this to get a few referrals and this is a great way to start off your bankroll.

  • Jackson should have went all in instead of re-re-raising. In this case most of the time its who goes all in first. Both played this hand well

  • @HoLeInOnE905 Jackson couldn't go all-in because he couldn't risk being called by Ivey with a 4 to 1 chip lead and possible straight draw like 89 or 10 9. Jackson would then be risking two ways to lose instead of just the one (by folding to Ivey). That's why Ivey pushed is because he is good enough to figure that out when he asked himself "Why didn't he just push all-in, ahhh because he's drawing low. All-in."

  • "we are watching some poker here gary" no shit.

  • 5 6 was so readable, if he overbets the j then why not all in after the reraise? Without that all in it was obvious that he was bluffing.

  • I sa outstanding poker logo created by two canadian guys who were making a solid income online at 50free2play.co.cc on a consistent basis...

  • thats why where here, and there there.

  • @RickyAssadxD

    Thats while yoo knead two stay in skool

  • Paul jackson's face gives away too much

  • very sad he didnt call, i believe he could win.

  • pokerview is open to us players as well

  • @johnsmith7490 Pokerview is a scam and will be closed down!

  • One Million chips cost only USD100

  • You should take poker training program for improving game at 50free2play.co.cc. This is even true when they are here now with their bouns...

  • Any mistake made through audacity can easily be corrected...with more audacity.

    -law 28.

  • who ever ships it first on the river wins lol.

  • how retarded are you when you think this is real money? I mean come on. you are interested in the game, but you cant see the difference between a cash and a tournament game

  • Non_USA_players_sign_up_at_Ful­l_Tilt_Poker_with_referral_cod­e:FTUS600_and_you-will_get_a_6­00$_signing_bonus

  • I think he gonna fold here...all in

  • Thumbs down for the very incorrect title that still hasn't been fixed.

  • woooow its not a million DOLLAR bluff its a million tournament-chips bluff what a idiot who post the title on this video . . . .

  • maybe after all that time playing all these reraises they went totally in tilt and both made crap..

  • Man these rigged sites should be banned!!

  • "We are watching some poker here Barry"

  • like great art, it is absurd and beautiful at the same time. Awesome comment

  • Pro!

  • He is obviously bluffing cause he didnt go all in when he was pot commited

  • Using_Referral_Code:FTUS600_at­_account_sign_up_with_Full_Til­t_Poker_gets_you_a-600$_bonus

  • I farted when I watched this. Also, the huge stack overpowering the short stack isn't magic.

  • I just want to thank Full Tilt Poker for giving me 600$ when I used the Referral Code: FTUS600 when I signed up for a new account.

  • misleading title those are tournament chips not cash chips. GFY.

  • @HartmanErika  This made me lol

  • lol riverbelle.info hows that site comin guys?

  • Comment removed

  • @killingj0ke23 sometimes he will be phil ivey

  • Last night I won money playing online poker with some chick too bad she was kinda cute too. It was fun and the action was real man. Everyone on the table sees each other real live through webcam its on pokerview. The funnest and realest online game Ive ever been on man. Gotta try it! Youll prolly never play these bs sites anymore.

  • It was a great hand...Phil Ivey have very good instincts when it comes to stuff like this.

  • I would of played that hand the same as phil!

  • Ivey put him on a seven and decided to bully him off it, no?

  • I realize that the other guy should have pushed earlier in the hand, but this has to be one of the sickest sequence of raises in history. Obviously Phil read the small reraises as a sign of weakness, but there was a possiblity that he was trying to milk Phil for a little more, or entice Phil to go all in over the top. Nonetheless, it was a great play by Phil.

  • sick.......but idiot, id never bluff with 6/5 offsuit, specially against phil ivey

  • @skisunshine they are pokerplayers

    jackson probably felt Ivey was bluffing in the start but then after that all in he did think he had J

  • @danieldavidbast just watched it again

    i spose Jackson trying to show strength at the start, thinking about its a great re-raise from Ivey, so clever, he must have though "why would you re-raise if you had a Jack?!" takes some balls though...

    Really Crazy play!

    and im not a proffesional poker player, but maybe i'll try this if the situation ever crops up, 6 5 off suit all the way

  • i dont see how he can possibly continue in this hand... everything paul jackson has.. i'm all in... WHAT!?

  • its not a million dollar bluff, its chips, not cash

  • @disfiguration cash in chips

  • 5 people are related to jackson

  • Honestly, if Jackson had known both players cards, wouldn't it have been correct to call the All-in considering he was getting more than 3 to 1?

  • @RHeckman00 i think he needed 4 to 1 to call and thats if he KNEW ivery had absolutely nothing. he messed up by just reraising the reraise. He should of just went all in after phils reraise if he was solid about his read, but he rerasied and looked weak and phishy.

  • @RHeckman00 no it would have been better to just go all in after the first raise

  • this is incredible!!!

  • only one guy in the crowd clapped when he laid it down

  • MILION DOLLAR? RIGHT

  • Unraised pot? Fucking stupid commentators

  • TOURNAMENT CHIPS, NOT MONEY. IT IS NOT A MILLION DOLLARS

  • its not 1 million dollars

    its 1 million chips!!!

  • anybody interested in an online game just email me at thepokerguy2323@yahoo

  • you have to give some credit to jackson also...

  • @jackdooley Eh no. He played it stupid. He should have just called the first bet of Phil Ivey. Why the hell would you raise. Should have called flop and raised the turn or bet big on the turn if Ivey checked.

  • @jackdooley Jackson played it bad though. He needs to shove on his second raise, or call and bluff the turn. His stacks too small to play any different. Or, the powerplay I like in his spot, the old fold 6 high.

  • @captcool420

    Exactly what I thought when I was watching this. His second re-raise just looks SO weak.

  • @captcool420 yeah he did play pretty bad .. i probably would have went all in before phil did , if he really wanted to bluff .

  • reraise ivey on flop.Verry wrong play against agressive players.If he had something he would call,call,raise on river and finished the job,he should play like that in this position

  • reraise ivey on flop.Verry wrong play against agressive players.If he had something he would call,call,raise on river and finished the job

  • 1:51 left above 666,000 :P

  • this would never happen in 2010... imo bad play both of them...with PHIL playing it a little bit better

  • @faspan2000

    what's the point going around posting this on all those videos?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @mudron2277

    Rofl.. I can spare 10 dollars my full tilt name = furdren0884 =D

    And yes

    You might have heard people sharin all over their facebook wall that you can register using the promo code AMERICAS @ Full Tilt Pokers web page.

    Its a amazing promotional deal. They will double your first deposit also a few other amazing perks. Sucks but its limited to the first 3500 players that create an account usin this

  • he should have went all in when phil did a re-reraise.. should have been instant all in straight away.. and phil would have to fold unless he got the ace high and thinks the other guy is bluffing.

  • the title is "Crazy Million Dollar Bluff"... it wasn't a million dollars, it was a million ***tournament chips***... and there's a huge difference. Even if Ivey loses all his chips, he still finishes second and wins money. If this was a cash game, this hand would never have taken place.

  • @jsberson tourny winner gets a million dollars dumb shit

  • @jolli86 Yeah, but I guess you're too much of a moron to realize that if second place pays $600,000, then the difference being $400,000 is what they're actually playing for, not the full million. And that wasn't the reason for the title of this video, but you're just too dumb to understand that too.

  • @jsberson

    Scotty could have played that way in a cash game

  • @jsberson u r right, but read some about icm.

  • @jsberson agreed...even if he would have lost thta hand, he would have had him 3-1 in chips...still a reasonable position

  • lol rigtards

  • 666k pot

  • that's why they are there, an we are here

  • @andreacusi no the only reason is because they have money to bet and not us lol

  • Eyes on the balls.. Uhm, eyeballs that is.

  • put the physical tells aside cuz jackson clearly looks nervous. but he could be nervous with the ace high flush draw which would call. its the bet size that ivey picks up on. if jackson had a jack, a seven, or a flush draw he wouldve just moved in. the only logical thing is a bluff. would any of us mere mortals picked up on this... probably not, but im pretty sure its the bet size more than anything that allows ivey to make the play.

  • Get rakeback at Hotogetpokerrakeback com. Sign up and email me at ret7268@aol.com and I'll send you a link where you can start your own affiliate site and make money signing up people.

  • U should change the video title cause it's not a million dollar pot. It is a MILLION CHIPS POT. And this is a little HUGE difference.

  • the little guy didn't connect at all because he raised and then he re rasies again would put a red flag up, imediatly all in, because he didn't call all in after the raises means he don't have the hand, if you think about it and with ivy in chip lead he was like fck it all in cause the other guy can only beat a bluff

  • He obviously had a good read on the guy

  • OMG

  • no ivey didn't care. He was 4 to 1 favorite chip wise already. If jackson had the jack so be it. IF not hes got 2 over and back door flush draw. Also could be ahead if jackson on some sort of straight or flush draw. If jackson wsas deeper he would of never shoved for his tournament life. THats not balls of steel if he did for tournament life then thats different but jackson had very few chips left already.

  • it's not million dollar bluff, it's million chip bluff

  • @jparkfosho It's a million dollars for first place, so I guess it's a million dollar bluff after all.

  • @jparkfosho its not a turnament , chips = $

  • @hetfield15 It IS a tournament dummy. The chips do not equal money.

  • @jparkfosho THE PRISE IS million dollar . your indicating its for chump change chips arnt you

  • @jparkfosho It was heads up for 1 million dollars first place, which this hand essentially guaranteed would go to Phil Ivey.

  • @jparkfosho the first place prize is 1 million, so it pretty much is a million dollar bluff

  • @jparkfosho million dollar bluff cos he basically takes him out and the prize pool is over a million..

  • best hand ever!! props to jackson to!

  • btw its milion chips not dollars jerks..

  • @SmoothANI

    The 1st prize is 1 million dollars so basicly an all in bluff is bluffing with a million dollars..

  • @UndercoverLdn only if they would be playing hands up and the difference between 1st and 2nd prize would be 1 million, in that case the title of the video would be correct...

  • pwnd

  • Its a $400,000 bluff a-hole

  • lol man the commentators dont have a clue heads up play is easy most of the time a board like JJ7 is pretty easy to read

    Granted the re re raise is complecated but queen high is gnerally good because u are not always going to hit the flop.

  • @MoFo872 i knew ive seen u on highstakes poker.u did something very similar to this because u r the best

  • @silentscream909 thank you i have made a few moves on phil ivey before think you seen me Tom Dwan lol hey man silent so your telling me you wud not think your queen high was good there 89% of the time queen is best only 4 cards that are beating you if the dude had the 7 of the jack he goes all-in on the re-raise from ivey No am i wrong

  • @MoFo872 well everyone here knows ur right ur obviously up there with ivey and i would expect u to do the same in that exact situation:D i dont wanna argue with someone holding 3 braclets.im sorry

  • @MoFo872 and yea he didnt need a j or a seven but more like a king ace pockets deuce anything would have done it,only 4 cards can beat u? u dont know the possibility k,someone with aces woulda done the same trying not to lose the other guy,why would u go all in if u had the nuts.u want the other guy to call and this was the impression jackson was giving off.please think b4 u talk cus u dont know shit u talking bout.let me see at urfinal table or just shutup please.

  • @silentscream909 Well its heads up the guy wanted to look good on telly making a move on ivey think about it plz

  • its called king ivey.......his reading is maybe even better than daniel N.

    -_-

  • Phil had to have some read on the guy....That's why he's Phil Ivy. If you think about it, after Phil reraised the second time, he would have gone all-in with a Jack in hand. But his opponent only reraised giving Phil the tell to go all-in. Still, a Ba-zallzy move!!

  • Ivey thought he had j8 obv

  • thats why he is ivey

  • Great hand but jackson made a key mistake. His play was good up until the second reraise where he should have either committed to the bluff and gone all in or folded. By only leaving himself 360K he made the decision alot easier for ivey because the way the hand played out it was unlikely jackson had a jack and if he had a 7 ivey still had outs so the all in play was the most logical one to make. All this is very easy to say though when your watching it on youtube with nothing on the line...

  • million dollar chips not real money

  • @p0ppInHo its allmost real money because this is the heads-up

  • this is indeed the most skilled hand i've ever seen! don't give ivey all the credits, well played by jackson also!

  • Damn Phil Ivey looks so scary.

  • So thats what big ass balls facial expression looks like.. I see a little of me in them but only when I have had 2 shots of Hennessey and a big stack of chips with the correct bank roll untouched :)

  • if this had been online the guy with 65 with had called the all in and got a 6 on the river.. and then said ty

  • @nomad806 omg thank you, you amde me laugh...

  • @nomad806 lololol so true