Omid Djalili - Pride and Racial Prejudice - PART 4

[piniwalie]

DON'T ANYONE DO ANYTHING FOR FUN ANYMORE?!

[a7medovic]

mmoooooooohahahahahahahahahaha­ha

[MrIjazz]

Theologist, you sound like a dick.

[annie2shoes]

hahahahahahaahaha! Not seen this before, I love it, fabulous!! :=DDD

[kachalman]

Persian NOT arab!!!

[andishmandan]

@kachalman plz... this is a civillised forum.. not for u to spread the persian arab crap.. i am iranian and i love arabs and turks and british people... i hardly doubt makes a diffirence for a westerner persian or arab, were middle eastern they are european,another is east asian , were all happy people who wanna get along and are sick and tired of comments like yours.

[RoodiMoses]

@andishmandan That's the spirit bro.. I'm and Arab and I love Persians  ;)

[zebibey]

"daddybear"

[davisgreen2020]

Shame Jane Austen´s book was not more like this.. it would have been more interesting..

[crazy4ever0]

lol can all of u get a life

[bassclefRage]

Arguing on Youtube is like the special olympics

Win or lose...

[gypsygirlish]

0.54.. lmao! only omid could get away with that outfit hahaha

[Erednyen]

Theologist, you are just a bit ignorant. It just happens that it was precisely in the Middle East that the first civilations emerged around architecture, art, mathematics, science, medicine, etc , as you say. And how about China? They knew writing longtime before anybody else. How about Ancient Egypt? All these great civilizations were not built by white European people. Europe as civilization evolved much later.

[gypsygirlish]

@Erednyen well said!

[Writergurl24]

@Erednyen Very true. And the middle eastern peoples were the ones who came up with the numbers we have today, and the Greeks came up with the letters we know use. The people of England looked back on the writers of the Great Greek Philosophers like Homer, Ovid, and others and became inspired and thus the Renaissance.

[The1stPoster]

@Erednyen Why do you faggots insist on starting historical debates. This is a piece of fucking comedy.

[GingieMalmsteen]

@Erednyen you should really put @theologist so he can see you have responded to him, otherwise you just have the last say. maybe you did this on purpose to make him look like he is scared to respond when infact its just that by writing 'theologist' dosent actually give any notification to theologist that you have responded to him :P just sayin...

[Erednyen]

@GingieMalmsteen , thanks for your comment. naaah, didn't do it on purpose, and why would anyone be scared of what I have to say anyway? I guess if theologist or anybody else is really interested in replying , he will do so.

[AryoArian]

looooooool

[ShinnokPrime]

lol at 0:54. Big pubes

[bishamon1461]

lol thats just creepy......... but funny :P

[Xantion]

Why are you all talking about this racist crap when the video has nothing to do with it? Is that chip on your shoulder too heavy or what?

[luketorpedo]

she love a bit of the persian rug

[peymaania]

I adore "Persian Love Rugs" I'm looking for a Furry Purrrrsian for my Pussy meself!

[staringintotheabyss]

rofl

[magister1412]

does anybody ever fight and argue with their mother for the same man?!

[mopanahi]

mr farsi?

[hanbanxxx]

alison steadman is sooo good :)

[TheLocalBlackandLiz]

I love her for doing this. She is the perfect Mrs. Bennett.

[qbadge3]

hahahahahahahahahaahahahahahah­ahahahahaa look at all the comments that thought all that hair was real

[Theologist]

Wow if people think Persians are hairy, they need to look at Greeks and Italians first, lol.

And yeah...that hair is most obviously fake. Even to someone who has downs syndrome.

[adeelaw86]

Come to teddy bear ... AHAHAHAHAHA

[Niobesnuppa]

Hahaha! "No animals were harmed in the making of the chest hair"! That's one really hairy guy. I love this sketch.

[NazriB]

My god, that's one hairy furball...Somebody certainly needs a good shaving. He certainly can keep her warm at night.

[GhormehSabzi6700]

Persian NOT arab!!!

[ahabbaba]

thank you!

there's a difference!

[Theologist]

Difference being Persians are Aryan, and arabs are semites. It's like saying the chinese are french. Ridiculous, no? Exactly.

[rumbato]

theo i think that was bit of extreme analogy, french and chinese. However, i see ur point though, persians are closer to their indian aryan brothers then to Arabs or Turks.

[Theologist]

Err...that's an incorrect reference as well. The only connection to the 'indians' is a big of racial mixing that happened in the northern part of india, as actual indians are dravidians which are a form of Black.

And indians aren't Aryan. That's a misconception. I don't want to get into this with you.

And no, Persians are closer to Turks than Indians anyway because the Turks are a mixture of the Persians, Mongols, and a bit of Greek.

I'm sick of revisionist history.

[rumbato]

Theo does it bother u to be compared to Indian? well the whole world's linguist experts and historians say that Indians are Aryans, so , just becuase u iranians dont like it, does not change established facts. You should not be ashamed of it, becuase indians now are for more advanced in my opinion in science and economy than iran and other middle eastern countries.Dont let ur personal prejudices cloud ur judgment. Further more, speaking of being mixed, iranians are also very mixed racially.

[Theologist]

Instead of following what you've been told, why don't you actually research it? The problem is that historians initially believed one of the following:

- Aryans came from India to Norway

- Aryans came from Norway to India

The problem was that further research showed that the Aryans actually originated on the western side of the Caspian sea (Iran), and went in 3 directs:

1) Europe

2) Around the other side of the Caspia

3) East of Persia, into northern india

[Theologist]

So then what you have is the Brahman and Zoroastrian 'indians' which are of mixed Iranian/Indian lineage. As you can see, they are also the ones who are in charge of everything.

If you look back from a scientific stand point, you will see that it would be impossible for India to have ever been Aryan, due to historic artifacts and documents which show the origination of many things Indians lay claim to, as being Iranian.

The name of their country is Persian, supporting the "Invasion" theory.

[Theologist]

If you actually want to discuss this with me, read up on it rather than saying "It's true because I was told it's true."

Also, "Iranians" are mixed because "Iranian" isn't a racial designation. Iran has many different races in it. About 49% of Iranians are actually Persian.

Remove all spaces:

ww w . ca is-soa s . c om /CAIS /Images2 /General /Gene_c lusters . jpg

[rumbato]

theologist i am not an expert of linguistics or history, but i love to read about it. This topic is not the kind that contain grey areas, ALL encyclopeadas, history books i have read about india says that they are Aryans(i dont know about dervidians though). so dont try to lecture me go lecture 99% of history experts. However, i say a man who has a motto "racist as fuck" such as ur self is by it self very revealing, not only u need lessons on history but lessons on humanity.

[Theologist]

The problem is that with earlier works, a lot of it went based off of Theories. That's why even as early as the 1940's there were some who believed the Nordic theory.

As geneology has advanced and more archeological research has been done, a lot of information has come up which debunks the previous theories. That's why there are many who are now pushing for the abolition of the term "Indo-European" as it wasn't the Indians who went to Europe, but the Aryans who went to India AND Europe.

[Theologist]

People who are intolerant of racists are just as intolerant of them as the racists are of other races. You are both practicing intolerance, and you each believe yourselves to be the righteous one. So don't preach to me about racism. ;)

My belief is that most country's have their OWN history that they need to be proud of. Instead of indians trying to ride the Iranian/European coat tails, they should be proud of all the things their own people have contributed to civilization.

[rumbato]

Nazi politicians were very shrewed and used race to advance their adgendas to maniuplate the ignorant masses to create an empire, dont compare them to skinheads who use race to feel good about their personal miserable situation. Furthermore, Iran is very mixed and the vast majority are very brown, maybe not as brown as the indians but neverthless brown, and dont fit the aryan idea of hitler. however, the shrewed politicians he was, he used aryan nonsense to get support from iran.

[DimbagFanRIP]

Iran was a neutral country

the allied forces even had meetings there

[Theologist]

To be VERY blunt:

- The Germans would have burned the Indians (and they did. the gypsies, which were of Indian descent)

- The Germans labeled Iran as the only Aryan nation outside of Europe, and exempted them from the Nuremberg Racial Laws.

- Neither the Germans nor the Iranians accept indians as Aryans

- Any attempts at calling themselves "Aryan" will make the Actual Aryans and the world hate them, and it also diminishes their own Indian culture, which DID give a lot to the world.

Cheers.

[rumbato]

theo u r completely wrong, Hitler was extremely friendly with the Indians and the indian freedom movements , actually they even milked the idea of england occupying india. Himler him used to even make weekly radio addresses praising the indian struggle. Further more, the Nazis almost get rid of the Aryan nonsense by the time they invaded Russia to get support from the slavs and Italians who were not fond of such nonsense.

[Theologist]

None of what you said is real. I will leave you with one line:

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend...for now."

That's all it's about. But you can think what you want. Leave me out of it. I study race through science. Not through "What I want to believe because I'm an Insecure Indian who is ashamed of my own race" like you.

Tata.

[rumbato]

theologist, studying of race is not a sin, it is what u make of it. If it is meant to subject others then we know what happend in ww2 , millions were persished becuase of it, and the minute u sanitazed the idea of killing and subjicating people becuase of their race then u could be the next victim, becuase the minute u seem reedamble the doctore will say they u have defected genes (ethonasia) then u will be killed next, it could happen to ur brother or sister or father etc.

[Theologist]

Stop talking. You're brown.  You're not Aryan. Your north was invaded by us, but that's long gone. You are Brown. That's all you'll ever be. Don't talk about this shit with me.

Worthless fucking indopaki's.

[rumbato]

theologist oh i thought u were one of those european nutcases, but u r an iranian praising racism, how sad and shocking! And i guess u could not continoue to speak with civility becuase u ran out of idea. Anyway, and no i am not indopaki, i would be honored if i am one, I am an Arab. You are no different than those black nationalist who keep dissing everyone racillay to feel superior. Man, u dont need racism and insulting other people to feel good, there are better ways!

[carkeyking13]

LOL!

[staringintotheabyss]

Theologist, what the fuck are you smoking? Go google Azeri's. Northern Iranians are pale/white. It was the Northern Iranians that pwned the fuck out of the Arabs and removed them from the south. When Islam took over Iran, it was the Northern Iranians that made their own version to fight the Arabs with. Arabs may have wiped out most Mid-East races, but they failed with the Persians, and hence are jealous.

[Theologist]

As a Persian myself, I'm confused as to why you're telling me this.

[staringintotheabyss]

Ah, looking back, it was a mistake. When I saw your comment, "you're brown, you're not aryan", I thought you were talking to another Persian and I didn't know you were Persian yourself, lol. Moham neest ;)

[alphaamplitude]

one way i agree wid ya.

[seamr05]

"The Germans labeled Iran as the only Aryan nation outside of Europe, and exempted them from the Nuremberg Racial Laws".

Alfred Rosenberg also viewed the berbers of northern africans as Aryans. Rosenberg, the socalled "racial" expert, said that they descended from the Vikings and not the Vandals.

Source: wikipedia.

[Theologist]

If you had a clue, you'd realize that Alfred Rosenberg went offtrack to support the Nordic Theory of Aryanism which was later disproven.

And regardless of any theoretically falsehoods, at the end of the day, it was labeled as "The Two Nations: Germany and Iran." With Germany being the Aryan flag-bearer in Europe, and Iran being the Aryan flag-bearer in Asia/Eurasia.

Too bad Wikipedia doesn't give you all the details, huh? ;)

[seamr05]

I guess so :-)

The reason that I ran into Rosenberg, was because I was studying the ethnic origins of the berbers, which is extremely hard, due to the numerous empires that have, let us say "dropped by" for a visit or two during the course of history. But if berbers or amazigh are simply African, then where does red/blond hair, and green/blue eyes, and white skin pop up at time to time? In regards to the berbers there is no conclusive answer actually...:-)

[Theologist]

Well there were Aryan invasions into north Africa, just as there into North India. That's why you have s somewhat different haplogroup makeup between the Brahmans and the Dravidians in India.

I was actually reading a study on the contributions of Aryans to the history of Egypt. Apparently the early Pharaohs had Aryan/Mixed blood. You can research on "Nefertiti."

There were also notes regarding the Egyptian God, "Ra," having actually been Mithra (Zoroastrian/Mithraism..perso-­greek/roman). ;)

[seamr05]

I knew about the pharoes and pure blodlines, but i didn't know that the casts of India were based on race actually. I was under the impression that it was based on politics that later became hinduism as we know it today.

But you really seem to be into all that stuff :-)

I think it's interesting as long as one does not obsess over it. But that's my

opinion :-) Take care...whatever race or creed you belong to...

[carkeyking13]

WTF!!!

surely u shud be talkin about omid djallili?

[seamr05]

yeah, well we got a little of track...it happens:-)

[gheysarhadi]

I am from iran and aryanism is been around more than that, you are wrong my dear little friend ...

[DimbagFanRIP]

the indians have only slight aryan blood

but aryan blood is aryan blood and im persian and i accept them

[Theologist]

I have 2 ways to go about this. One is to say that only a small percentage of Indians have any Aryan blood at all. And because of that, the English gave all government posts, land, etc to them when they left. The majority of the indian population is negroid. Just because a minority has 'trace' amounts of Aryan blood, mostly through invasions, it doesn't make them Aryan.

Secondly... Hitler said other races/countries are weak/useless because they mixed their Aryan blood. Like the Indians.

[Ittace]

@Theologist

hitler never said that jews are weak because they mixed their aryan blood.

He said jews are weak because they are jews and their blood is a curse

[Theologist]

I was referring to their comments on other Europeans. He said that while they were mostly from the same Aryan ancestry, the others allowed themselves to breed and mix blood with weaker races, making them inferiors.

Jews are Semites.

[punkrockinggirly]

@Theologist i think ur awful

[DimbagFanRIP]

i feel so sorry for you

you are aryan and that retard cant accept you because of his primitive "superiority"

im iranian also and with you

[Theologist]

My motto is:

"I'm racist as fuck, and I've studied what I talk about."

And I repeat again, Indians are not 'Aryan.' The term "Indo-European" is false and is non-existent. I'm not going to give you a lecture. Study it yourself. Read up on haplogroup dna listings.

[DimbagFanRIP]

you sound like Hitler

It's been scientificaly proven that although we are all different colours no race is better than the other FACT

[Theologist]

That's not true. Every race evolves in a specific way, giving it certain strengths in certain areas. Look at races in the olympics. 90%+ are black people. No matter which country they represent. Because blacks are built for it. They can also breathe better, again because they evolved for those purposes. Hunting, etc...

Whites, on the other hand, evolved around architecture, art, mathematics, science, medicine, etc...so their body didn't need to upgrade. Their mind did. :)

[Ittace]

@Theologist

It's true that most black people evolved better physical skill. But saying that white people are smarter because they grew up with intelectual is absolutely racist.

IQ has got nothing to do with what your growing up with. Black people can be as smart as white people.

[Theologist]

See, now you're just being a retarded hypocrite. You will admit that Black people are better at something, but you will not admit that they are worse at something. That is just down right ignorant, and RACIST. You are RACIST against white people, because you say Black people are superior to White people physically, and are 100% matched in every other way.

It's just idiocy to make such a claim.

[Ittace]

I don't even know if you are worthy of my comments. It is scientificly proven that the percantage of black people with "light" bones is bigger than the amount of the white people. This is PHISICALLY speaking.

IQ, "smartness" does not depend only on inheritance! therefore if you grow around intellectuals you will probably be smarter. the reason why there are more "bright" white people is because most of them grow in better places than black people. It has got nothing to do with evolution!!!

[Theologist]

Facts are fun when they're not real. You can study and see that even when it comes to black people who were raised in wealthy families who lived in white communities, they don't reach the same level of intelligence and success in the scientific fields as a white person.

Honestly. You're ignorant. There was an article in the Journal of Science a few years ago that showed a mans brain works 3% faster than a womans brain. I bet you'll deny that too.

Racial Differences are REAL and significant

[Ittace]

your right a mans brain works faster and a man have a better conseption of space, women for example can do more things at once.

But there is absolutely no agreement of scientists claiming that black people are more stupid than white people. you can't claim that white people are smarter because they are more successful. This differences may be due to many reasons but they can't tell you that a white man is brighter than a black one. Racial differences exist... this isn't one of them.

[matoushka]

@Ittace

Men's brains do NOT work faster. Where on earth did you hear that? It's nice that you're critical of racism, but that doesn't mean you're allowed to be sexist instead. :)

[Voydr]

@Theologist Your nickname says it all. I don't debate with stupid people, no offense, but you should get a life. I mean a real one. Dissing races and women won't improve your social status.

[Theologist]

@Voydr Really? You must not live where I live then. Over here everybody is either a racist or a secret racist. ;)

[1tjos]

@Theologist if it wasnt for black people most the world wouldnt be the same today and mens brians do work faster but thats only becuase in prehistoric times men did more and women were seen as objects but also there are many things women are better at than men.

[matoushka]

@Theologist

This is why I always regret reading the YouTube comments section: because I inevitably come across idiotic and ignorant comments like yours.

[Theologist]

@matoushka My comments aren't ignorant. You're being ignorant of facts in favour of political over-correctness.

[matoushka]

@Theologist

If what you are putting forward are facts, then why is racism rejected by basically every academic and intellectual institution in the world? You think they're just blinded by political correctness? You have some rudimentary knowledge of history, but being knowledgeable doesn't help you if you see only what you want to see.

[Theologist]

@matoushka Because the world is overly politically correct and they'd risk their job by being honest and truthful about matters regarding race. Such as what happened to a world renowned Nobel prize winner a few years back.

[matoushka]

@Theologist

Sigh. You seriously think there's a worldwide conspiracy to keep the "truth" of racism under wraps? I think, for starters, you can read "Black Skin, White Masks" by Frantz Fanon. Really, I urge you to read this book.

[Theologist]

@matoushka No, there's no conspiracy. It's just socially frowned upon because we live in an age of extreme political correctness.

[matoushka]

@Theologist

No, actually we live in an age of extreme racism only slightly mitigated by half-hearted efforts at political-correctness.

[matoushka]

@Theologist

As Francis Bacon has said, “The root of all superstition is that men observe when a thing hits, but not when it misses.”

You're only looking at things that confirm your prejudices, and it makes me sad to see otherwise intelligent people destroying their minds in such ways.

[0RAMARAMADINGDONG0]

THANK U !

[ScxiiPersiianH0daa]

we'd like 2 point out that there were no animals harmd in the making off the cest hair there all mine

loved that partxD

[xrandomloverxx]

"come to daddy bear!"

[life4nothing]

you the best omid :D

[mainmanguy]

lol