Added: 3 years ago
From: scotchrks
Views: 6,941
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'm happy I found your videos. I'm contacting you because

    I'd like to pay you some dollars for placing my link in

    your video description. 949-545-1195

  • Hello again, it seems you are quite busy, I wonder if you could let me know if you had any bad experience in the time you used HHO. I am aware that in the winter everything will go back to no HHO but as soon as possible I will activate it (once I installed it in the first place). People are getting more and more interested in HHO and I believe it will boom again. Thanks for sharing ;-)

  • @DirkME1022 I never had any bad experience with HHO, and that is because of VERY careful research, and safety precautions. Zerofossilfuel on youtube is the channel you want to hit up for more advanced and further research. I hope this helps you!

  • @scotchrks Thank you for your reply. Maybe you will come back to HHO, I think they have made quite some progress with all the devises and controls in place. I will let you know if yo want how it goes ;-) Thank you for your advice, I will check Zerofossilfuel for further information. Thank you and take care. If you start using HHo agin, would be great if you could give me a message ;-) God Bless You.

  • Hello and thank you for your survey. Are you still using HHO and are you still happy with it? Any long term effects? Thanks for sharing ;-)

  • @DirkME1022 I am no longer using HHO in my car unfortunately. Winter months, and constant monitoring and maintenance on this paticular set up was not practical

  • @scotchrks I just bought the VOLO chip which should take care of the fuel/air mixture regarding to the O2 Sensor. Once I have that chip installed, I would like to add a small HHO cell in my car and see what it does. Most people have no effect as they don't care about the O2 sensor letting the computer think the car is to lean and injects more fuel. However, I trust it will work and I will attempt to change water and baking powder every 2 month, hoping that keeps me running.

  • @scotchrks How long did you have this running and what is your observation regarding to maintenance etc.? Thanks for your reply ;-)

  • EMISSIONS AND TOTAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF A MULTI CYLINDER PISTON ENGINE RUNNING ON GASOLINE AND A HYDROGEN-GASOLINE MIXTURE

    Johz F. Cassidy Lewis Research Center

    Cleveland, Ohio 44135

    - NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, 0. C. MAY 1977

    Search for that and then you see that HHO does work according to NASA, maybe the critics do believe NASA.

  • Fuel economy improvement by on board electrolytic hydrogen production.

    - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kocaeli University, 41100, Kocaeli, Turkey

    - Hydrogen Economy Utilisation Co., Altintepsi Mah. Kazim Karabekir Cad. No: 67, Istanbul, Turkey

    AGAIN OFFICIAL RESEARCH, LOOK FOR YOURSELF, GOOGLE IT.

  • Just to be sure, for the real hardheaded critics.

    GUIDELINES FOR USE OF HYDROGEN FUEL IN COMMERCIAL VEHICLES Final Report, November 2007.

    - US department of transportation

    SEARCH FOR IT BEFORE YOU MAKE STUPID COMMENTS TO THIS VERY HONEST VIDEO WITH TRUE RESULTS.

  • This is excellent, but I got a little lost on your calculations, so I did my own...

    At 410.9/gal (although I'm sure it's cheaper now):

    23.7mpg is 17.337 cents per mile.

    27.1mpg is 15.162 cents per mile.

    So on your weekly journey of 410 miles, you used to spend $71.08 but now you spend $62.16.

    You save $8.92 per week.

    In a year, you'll save $463.84 but I'm sure you do more journeys than just to/from work!

  • Well BILL, I appreciate the patronizing, but very whimsy way you fabricate your words together. Sounds like a hallmark card. I only started these projects to just get the honest facts out there for interested people who don't have alot of money to be chasing false dreams BEFORE they become prey to half-witted, greedy manufacturers. This is HYDROGEN folks, and should always be treated with safety and respect!

  • Well BILLYHURRICANE, I think I should be asking you the same question, since you are selling HHO units to customers. You must be a confident expert at this. So what is your answer? If you think there might be a valve or piston meldown using HHO, don't you think you should do more research before selling your units to unknowing customers???

  • Well Billy, since you've posted the same damn question throuought my videos, I will answer your question... I DON'T KNOW! I never claimed I knew, nor would I ever. OR would I ever state such fear injecting questions about a subjesct that is rather new to most, such as yourself. Most people believe that since hydrogen burns much quicker than gas, it has much less time to transfer heat to parts that are in contact with it, resulting in a more efficient, cleaner burn.

  • Do you have the EFIE running on this car?

  • Hey scotchrks! Question... How close is the estimated mpg of your Scangauge to your numbers at the pump. I am having very conflicting results using the "TOP OFF" method. If the scangauge is more accurate let us know.

  • I would trust the car computer first, then second the scangauge, but only if you've entered in the correct numbers. At setup, you are asked to enter your tank size, then every fillup, you have to enter the gallons pumped into the tank. If you do that correctly, it's pretty close when it tells you how many gallons you've used. Usually I expect 3-4 tenths deviation from the actual pump gallons when the pump shuts off. Not a very good control to use the pump click off method to determine MPG.

  • Thank you for your efforts Scott! They are more than appreciated! I have a 2006 Impala with the 3.5, did you get the o2 sensor and MAF resolved? If so, what method did you employ? Feel free to contact me at FL610atAOLdotcom. I beleive we have the frequency MAFs so the adjusters on the market wont work. I did see your video with the o2 EFIE, did you stick eith the approach. Again, thank you !!

    Bill

  • A saving is a saving,you are right!if petrol was 10 cents cheaper think of the queue!

  • Tip! Listen very carefully. ONCE you can achieve STABLE output of at least 1 litre/ min, PROPERLY tweak your sensors, and achieve 100% reliability, go to the Chevy dealer and have them retard your timing 2 degrees for a later spark. Petrol burns at 14,000/sec and Hydro burns (explodes) @ 40,000ft/sec. By doing so, you will reduce back pressures from "premature ignition" of the Hydrogen. Remember, Hydro burns first, the it in turn burns the petrol, all of it. This you save your crank bearings.

  • I think from a previous video showing a State Trooper vehicle that you live in Michigan. I live in Alpena. I have a patent pending generator that is very very small. It can be mounted at any angle but upside down and fit almost anywhere. I have mine mounted between my grill and radiator where it stays cool. The output runs along the radiator hose for quick heating in winter, but puts out bigtime at freezing temps. I don't want to give away 2 much on here so I will leave it there for now.

  • Hydrogen Hybrid Technologies is listed on the stock exchange. They hold several worldwide patents for these designs. Good luck to you with that. They've been in business a long time so it's going to be tough for anyone to patent a new idea on this design. I'm not saying you can't. That would be foolish. Just some information that everyone may be interested in. They're listed as HYHY.

  • The technology can come in many forms. They can't patent what is public domain. This is what HHO is Public Domain. You can produce HHO with a Feather Cap for a top and patent that if you like, but not the electrolyzing of water to make HHO. So now I see we have gone from HHO that can't improve MPG to Be careful about doing so because it may have a patent. HOORAY!

  • Yeah...I agree. I was getting a little tired of the morons with physics degrees myself.

    A physics degree doesn't mean you know everything. Motors are only about 40-50% efficient. Many things can improve that. And even if you doubled the efficiency physics would be correct in stating you will never achieve 100%. That WOULD be a perpetual motion machine which I also don't believe is possible.

  • Reply#2. The condensate tank I use is an aftermarket fluid reservoir from Advance Auto. It's about $8.00. Very sturdy and small. Just run the bubbler out line to the bottom or side of the condensate tank, then from the condensate tank to your air intake. This really works great. No apparent loss of Vinegar in 2 weeks. Want more Hydro and less O2? Use Distilled white vinegar. Vinegar has 1 more Hydrogen molecule than water. Boosted my output for sure. Doesn't evaporate as fast as water either.

  • 1 of 2 replies. Use a condensate tank after your bubbler, then use an in line gas check valve in the line leading to your intake manifold. A bubbler alone is NOT ENOUGH to satisfy the insurance company. Trust me, I have done my homework here. The condensate tank does trap almost all the condensate before entering your intake delivery tube. It is not necessary to put electrolyte in the condensate tank. Just use what gets trapped to replenish your bubbler or generator. Godspeed.

  • You are on the right track! Dont get discouraged with your mileage findings. I know for a fact you can get at least 25% more friend. I would like to share some things with you but I dont want them posted on youtube. I Live in Alpena, Mi. How can I leave you info to contact me without it being seen by all? My youtube name is excell4God.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more