...There is a place that me and my people (Maori people) of NZ go to behind this hilly mountainy area where our spiritual founder placed a temple for us to go to and EVERY night, these "orb" looking things appear in all colours, will almost like multiply, appear to dance around and more...I do have video proof of all of them which you can see with your on eyes with out camera but I don't know if I want it on here in fear it may be miss used!
@LeeMarieC3 How awesome!! I have pictures taken at Mount Shasta in No California that have two orbs in them. One is the clear, slightly colored orb but the other one is vibrant with rings of color and you can not see through the color. I'll try to check out your pix.
@pharbor41 is it on your channel, what was the film you referenced at the end was it done by the illuminati driven Hollywood. I f it was its probably part of their alien dis information project which is using Telsas inventions
it is difficult but simple,the orb bar wave is not seen at the moment it is in space though. As you get closer to the van allen belts you can see it.
your living room is full of broadcast waves,,BBC,CNN,discovery channel, depends where you are in the world, these are real physical waves but are unseen, if something could illuminate these waves would it be worth not sleeping because you had seen it. this is the energy of creation that's all, the Mayans talked of these two worlds merging in 2012
You should put some questions about these to a channelled entity such as Bashar (Darryl Ankar) or Abraham (Esther Hicks). I'm sure they'd have lots to say about them.
How much research have you done to establish your denial, two cameras capable of capturing orbs at a distance from the lens, that is science and repeatable but knowing this produce no money so no one is interested
sunspots with reversed poles, light particle or wave, supernovas without star present, three trillion dugs industry based on lies, see marys boyles paper on the subject, believe you are right and everything you have been taught is right, you have no understanding what two images from two cameras mean, its you who chose's to deny the evidence, like science if it dose not fit ignore it or deny it. its unfortunate for you that you chose to believe without evidence, origins of man by Darwin,
his evidence was to measure brain capacity, his conclusion flawed, bigger brain proved evolution yet prehistoric man had a bigger brain volume, so now according to Darwin's theory evolution is reversing, what's that about? By the way what I have observed and applied to light seem true that there is not a constant speed to light, I have talked about this for years scientists are only just finding this out. The points on the membrane explain the supernova event without the star present.
New religion of science? You mean the same religion that brought us computers and airplanes and robots that drive on mars? Science is a method of examining phenomenon in order to create predictions of those phenomenon...the predictions, like gravity and nuclear physics, never seem to be wrong. It's a folly for you to not even understand what science is.
Paul, you continually reveal more and more how truly ignorant you are of what you speak. Science is the understanding that there IS NO TRUTH, ONLY THEORY, theories are the approximation of truth. Theory is the best you can hope for. You will never hear a scientist talk about the FACT of gravity, it will always be THEORY, because absolute truth is unattainable.
einstein approached sceince correctly, you only have to look at the mans quotes he was certain of very little, so much unkown, sceintists have lost that, and become the new preachers interpreting and indoctrinating us with their truth, no one has the coruage to break the illusion that has been created,
"it is difficult for a man to belive something when his salary depends upon him not beliving it"..........is sceince free and truthfull.........the drugs industry,petrolchemical industries......any sceintist who questions the chemical toxins in the food chain, probally will end up out of a job,how much techologly has been stolen and buried by the people in power, turkeys do not vote for christmas. Sceintists the holders of ego not truth
paul, stop with the red herrings. If you could prove any of these points individually instead of just blurting out a list of unrelated phenomenon...which there are natural explanations for which you have neglected to research...then we could try to hammer out your hypothesis of these orbs. Otherwise you just sound like a paranoid delusional.
i will be explaining how the theories effect all these things i mentioned, in a new video its simple string theory not quantum , look at tehter incident in space, look at the energy required for gravity to form planets during the big bang, have you seen all the videos the reaserch data is massive and repeatable, thats sceince
MORE red herrings. Paul, you are really ill equipped to even begin to talk about string theory...especially since you cannot grasp the basic concept of out-of-focus dust in photography. You have no repeatable research, you're just mistaking an incredibly MUNDANE effect of common DUST for something ethereal. Do me a favor and talk to some camera experts before you REALLY embarrass yourself.
Some people in the 16thc saw this and is recorded in the museum archives along with the woodcuts, so the villagers account did not happen ...... So now the nurenberg villagers and basil are liers, and through your arrogence you now tell us that did not happen. i think it did,and is an honest account of what they witnessed,why would they lie besides which we have recorded the bars sepperating and dropping spheres as mentioned in the 16thc account.
the account recalls the fear in the villagers, just imagine that they saw this and it could be seen again,we are more certain this could not happen so we have further to fall if it did,
How can orbs reflect light to mirrors in a garden? again proving distance from lense Denial........denial.......denial.......
Have you ever taken a picture outside with a flash while it was raining or snowing?
Orbs are nothing more than droplets of moisture or motes of dust...you are building a cult based entirely an a well understood phenomenon in photography...it's like the gang stalking victims who think lens flares are lasers.
its so simple take two cameras sepperate them take two images together, eventually you will capture orbs in the shared image area which of couse is not infront of the lense our basic trinagulation had that shared image area about 3m away, see all five videos, how about using mirrors, that works as well from that you can scale the size, what about the video?
It's so simple...because motes of dust and droplets of moisture are real. As long as that mote of dust is in the same volume of space, it will show up on any number of cameras. Did you think that was a real way of setting up a controlled experiment to prove they are supernatural? Because it actually proves MY point that they are totally natural.
so now we have spheres in the shared camera image area which is three to four meter away from each lense, how big is the dust to be captured that distance from the lense, have a look at the holes in the orbs, prime matter hydrgoen have these holes also been seen in space, recorded in 16thc wood cuts but look at the series first, it may be dust but it was awfull dusty in the bronze age the cullimative case study,
video matching digital stills so now you are going to tell me they had bronze age cameras, it is due to be seen again that will of course once seen will also be denied.
video or static images...there is NO difference. I'm not sure exactly what people in the bronze age were seeing since we have no photo evidence of what they saw, so it's yet ANOTHER red herring.
A lot of Herrings in those days but you would expect that, no commerical fishing fleet to wipe out stocks like 20thc man has done, read the account in the Zurich muesum from the 16th centuary, on the woodcut is a cross, on each end a sphere,unique, also on rock art,Are you suggesting we throw away all the images from hubble,no there is no static in space,electromatic feilds, and the light recorded is only millions of years old,
So now all equipment gives false readings. as for bronze age man They carved in rock art what they saw, like the events in Basel and Nuremberg in the 16thc
lmao, do you even know what a red herring is? You just threw yet another one into this discussion. Face it, you don't have a leg to stand on. All these individual and unrelated phenomenon being sewn together into this paranoid tapestry isn't convincing anyone. It's like arguing with a truther.
This was a process of discovery not something patched together. Like the excuse, "the fossil record will be found!"..... why is it taking so long?....... why don't you talk to the geologists about a time when the earths sedimentary rock process stopped, This is believed by the biologists/ evolutionists so they can keep selling those fish .....
The fossil record is there. Go look at it. Go to a museum. Ask to see the real fossil room.
Imbecile...go to a photography studio, ask them what these "spheres" are, they will explain it to you...and you'll probably dismiss it in favor of your comforting delusion.
So tell me why my mate who's a published Dr of Geology, who donated his fossil collection to the national museum because it was too large, told me in time they would find it (true transitional forms). So when did you get your doctorate, it would not matter anyway your mind is set, there is a massive fossil record, but it still is like a leaky sieve, why do some species return into their original form, so evolution reverses,
nothing in Darwins theory accounts for it, why do blind cave fish still have the dna for eyes? A quote for you from Enistein "To me the worst thing seems to be a school principally to work with methods of fear, force and artificial authority. Such treatment destroys the sound sentiments, the sincerity and the self-confidence of pupils and produces a subservient subject."
And one from me............. " and If you are such a product It will take you a lifetime to unpick the truth" I have not posted this for you if it causes you problems I am sorry, in time the science you have been taught will change, what I am observing has been seen since the bronze age
paul, it upsets me that you begin with such a bold assumption. Lightning has been around since the bronze age. They thought it was supernatural too. We now have a natural explanation for it. Science overturns old assumptions with new evidence. The plasticity of theories is NOT a strike against the scientific method. You fucking idiot. The fact that a theory might be modified or discarded is what makes it SUPERIOR to dogmatism. Yet another red herring.
when i was one i was looked after, two i was walking, ten i could fish,18 played rugby,26 married ran my own business, 30 had children,48 my birthday tomorrow, got the picture,i deffinatly know more than when i was twenty, that is not the case for you give up your studies of indoctration you know it all as there is nothing you need to learn. god bless you.
Find a single case where evolution "reverses" and you might have some ground to stand on. I DARE YOU.
Second of all, let me explain what a red herring is since you continually fail to look it up and realize what an infantile method of argumentation it is (which you are employing)
A red herrings is any change of subject that allows you to abandon an argument you are losing in order to make a point on a completely different subject to make it look like you are winning.
that's not an example of evolution going in reverse. It's an example of an adaptation becoming useless and evolution streamlining the architecture of the brain and body. It's a perfect example of evolution moving foreward...wow you are ignorant.
so the dna for the eyes remain in the genome sequence of the fish the building block of life,tell me why? Junk dna we know so little 90% unknown but you my freind know why so tell me,
So, you apparently still have not understood the meaning of the phrase "RED HERRING". Holy fucking cow. Genes get turned on and off all the time, it doesn't mean they disappear and reappear. Junk DNA is NOT junk. It's like all your knowledge of the things you argue against come from JUST laymen sources. Amazing. Did you even take highschool biology?
So now we have it 90% of dna is junk, not knowing the majority, effects small portion that is claimed is known, ramdomly take ten pages of 100 page book,so now you can tell everything thats contained in it, 10 mins of a hour documentary, and you know all the auguments, then lay claim sceince has the answer,its just an approximation of the truth. best guess, dark matter 80-90% of our universe is made of it,nothing known about it other than its there,
it the orb process so now i know 80-90% of the universes processes, in understanding this i begin to understand that i truly know nothing, unlike you my freind who claim to know everything!!!!!
Stop making assertions that my mind is "set". I'm not on a whim going to accept your poor arguments and flimsy evidence.
Second of all, go to a museum and ask them to show you all the transitional forms. Go on google and find tham. Watch CDK007's video on the abundance of transitional fossils.
Evolution does NOT reverse. You clearly have no understanding of evolution or you would not assert "evolution reverses". Your ignorance is astounding.
They are not SPHERES. It is astounding how ignorant you are about the WELL UNDERSTOOD effect of motes and droplets. They are OUT OF FOCUS OBJECTS and so they appear as blurry circles. I am shocked by how you are completely unaware of the very VERY basic and thoroughly understood effect of dust in photography.
I have often thought that anm Orb and a fertilized egg look very similar. It is like the small point of energy from which life develops, or is projected. I also don't think "Junk DNA" is "Junk" they just don't understand it - and quite possibly never will. I don't believe in "God" but I believe in Carl Sagan - hope this makes "sense"!!!
Of course, given your attempt at media attention, in due time you might have enough material written about you to make you eligible for 1.000.000 (1 Million) US Dollars by applying for the Million Dollar Challenge of which I'm certain you heard of...
Shurely with such overwhelming evidence you can't possibly fail to win?
my work is nothing to do with you, all i am demonstrating is that the ancient people knew this.
if there is a creator,(i am allowed my own veiw)money would be illrevelent,which of course it is,unless you have a god of money. what you worship is up to you !!
i think the important thing is loving yourself without condition, ego.... relase yourself from it, as it sepperates from everything.
as for worship look at you last comment about money i do not mean to insult you but that seems like worship to me. religion would have no point, if you could see this process again.......... peace brother.
At the end of your video you tell us to question things, and yet in your comments you expect us to unconditionally accept your "evidence".
I don't know whether you are a true believer or just hoaxing it to create a debate, but there is something highly illogical about these conflicting demands of us.
i am sure that at the end of the video i suggest that you prove it to yourself by getting you cameras out and taking you own images i suggest the best conditions rain ligthening give the quickest results, i will check on the videos i hope i did not leave that out
the last thing i want is people beliving me because i told them too, thats how we got into this mess in the first place. inside everynoe is the source of creation and the fingerprint of the creator. unlocking that what within, will set you free
i find it strange we can accept images from thousands of light years away(hubble), yet images of energy fifteen feet away we dismiss,many people have a hatred of a concept of a creator you my freind are no exception, keep buying Richard Dawkins books.
Have you ever considered that you may be a lunatic? Have you heard of Cognitive Dissonance? You have walked too far down the path of delusion, it would hurt too much to go back.
Not all theories are denied, some are just ignored until they hit the main stream. Yours is ignored because it is so much like so many other disproved "scientific" theories. It's also not a scientific theory: You make no predictions, and your only evidence is that round things look like other round things. What you have is all feeling, and nothing that is testable.
when the magnetic feild increases it will be seen again,the rotational speed of the earth will quicken due to the reduction in sun spot activity this is not the total picture.i could spend hours explaining light and why it does not have a constant speed.these events have been recorded in rock art and seen in the skies but its still dust infront of the lense,
Neither sun spots nor any gravitational field has any noticeable effect on the rotation of the earth. Stick figures painted next to a bunch of lines that are perpendicular to other lines is no explanation of the behavior of light. You still have not explained how your "orbs" are any different than blurry pictures of dust which are well-known in photography.
what about fluid, friction and the ice age,i will put it simply, spin a frozen ballon of water,then let it defrost and spin again.the fluid friction causes the earth to slow and the feild to weaken thats not the total story but it enough to explain it, so the little ice age is when we seen it last.
This video does not answer any of the questions that people have asked you on your previous videos, or the points that were made about dust flecks in the air.
heard of triagulation to calcuate distance missed the bit with the mirrors and reflections shooting with two cameras that are 1.3m apart still its dust infront of lense,no hope, first stager hey.
The same bit of dust would be in the same place, so two cameras could see it. Ten cameras could see it, that doesn't mean that there is anything there. On top of that, none of the pictures seem to have been taken at the *exact* same time by two different cameras, so triangulation is moot.
also if the cameras are 1.5m apart the dust would would have to apppear in the shared image area which of course is not in front of the camera as they are apart this would make the dust rather large.not your strong point i suppose
In which video, and at what time, have two cameras taken the same picture at the same time. I must have missed that, and I don't want to watch the videos again every time you make a point. I have been trying to find some pictures that you could triangulate in principle.
THANKS
TheSapphire011 1 month ago
Unbedingt beachten:
w w w. die-wahre-natur. de
DaskleineLogo 1 month ago
nice series, good info, keep up the good work...
KilluminatiTheMovie 5 months ago
i see these..check out my vids...
YackerUK 6 months ago
Attention all Orb loving Obamazombies!
I have just been told by an Obamabot that Obama is powerless to stop Bush
and Cheney from increasing deficit spending at a faster and faster rate day by
day. As we speak Obama is trying to put the brakes on driving this country into
bankruptcy but Bush and Cheney are forcing him to put his foot on the
accelerator! What are we to do? Will slamming Palin and Glenn Beck help? Can the Orb help us?
showthosearches 1 year ago
...There is a place that me and my people (Maori people) of NZ go to behind this hilly mountainy area where our spiritual founder placed a temple for us to go to and EVERY night, these "orb" looking things appear in all colours, will almost like multiply, appear to dance around and more...I do have video proof of all of them which you can see with your on eyes with out camera but I don't know if I want it on here in fear it may be miss used!
LeeMarieC3 1 year ago
@LeeMarieC3 How awesome!! I have pictures taken at Mount Shasta in No California that have two orbs in them. One is the clear, slightly colored orb but the other one is vibrant with rings of color and you can not see through the color. I'll try to check out your pix.
Tones4me1 1 year ago
Hi Paul I woud like to share a private video of an orb I have made in my country, so tell me if you are interessted.
And could you please give me the name of that beautiful song ....many thanks and bravo for your work
pharbor41 1 year ago
@pharbor41 is it on your channel, what was the film you referenced at the end was it done by the illuminati driven Hollywood. I f it was its probably part of their alien dis information project which is using Telsas inventions
paulcmuir 1 year ago
por que no lo subtitulan al español ??? /
Zubpaco 1 year ago
.youtube.com/watch?v=3f-8xMdhbOc
moskitobug 1 year ago
Remember they thought the appendix served no function or tonsils were useless. So they will probably figure out dna soon enough.
MajorqueenB 1 year ago
cool!!
wildernow 1 year ago
find the movie in Youtubesearch with masterloord a real Movie of Orbs
enjoy it
Masterloord 1 year ago
Photos can be taken in daylight too, just need a dark background
Eonetrucker 2 years ago
I filmed objects that are in motion during the daytime inside my home. Many are seeing them all over the planet.
See my channel for the first 2 clips that I put up today.
CosmicMessages 2 years ago
it is difficult but simple,the orb bar wave is not seen at the moment it is in space though. As you get closer to the van allen belts you can see it.
your living room is full of broadcast waves,,BBC,CNN,discovery channel, depends where you are in the world, these are real physical waves but are unseen, if something could illuminate these waves would it be worth not sleeping because you had seen it. this is the energy of creation that's all, the Mayans talked of these two worlds merging in 2012
paulcmuir 2 years ago
@paulcmuir check out my vids...what am i seeing then? i think spirit orbs...who knows.
YackerUK 6 months ago
I can see and summon orbs on a daily basis- aeileon el nino
AeileonElNino 2 years ago
what music is this? beautiful presentation,thanks.
grenda5 3 years ago
You should put some questions about these to a channelled entity such as Bashar (Darryl Ankar) or Abraham (Esther Hicks). I'm sure they'd have lots to say about them.
Great vid.
robrec0rd 3 years ago
yeah whatever your crazy
tenyar 4 years ago
How much research have you done to establish your denial, two cameras capable of capturing orbs at a distance from the lens, that is science and repeatable but knowing this produce no money so no one is interested
"quod erat demonstrandum"
paulcmuir 4 years ago
I see you have still got your fingers firmly in your ears Paul. "I REALLY NEED THIS TO BE TRUE, IT IS REAL! IT IS REAL!! LA LA LA I'M NOT LISTENING.
tenyar 4 years ago
sunspots with reversed poles, light particle or wave, supernovas without star present, three trillion dugs industry based on lies, see marys boyles paper on the subject, believe you are right and everything you have been taught is right, you have no understanding what two images from two cameras mean, its you who chose's to deny the evidence, like science if it dose not fit ignore it or deny it. its unfortunate for you that you chose to believe without evidence, origins of man by Darwin,
paulcmuir 4 years ago
his evidence was to measure brain capacity, his conclusion flawed, bigger brain proved evolution yet prehistoric man had a bigger brain volume, so now according to Darwin's theory evolution is reversing, what's that about? By the way what I have observed and applied to light seem true that there is not a constant speed to light, I have talked about this for years scientists are only just finding this out. The points on the membrane explain the supernova event without the star present.
paulcmuir 4 years ago
Carry on following the new religion of science it's a folly to think these people do not lie.
paulcmuir 4 years ago
New religion of science? You mean the same religion that brought us computers and airplanes and robots that drive on mars? Science is a method of examining phenomenon in order to create predictions of those phenomenon...the predictions, like gravity and nuclear physics, never seem to be wrong. It's a folly for you to not even understand what science is.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
sceince is "an approximation of the truth" you must have heard this said if you are sceintist
paulcmuir 4 years ago
Paul, you continually reveal more and more how truly ignorant you are of what you speak. Science is the understanding that there IS NO TRUTH, ONLY THEORY, theories are the approximation of truth. Theory is the best you can hope for. You will never hear a scientist talk about the FACT of gravity, it will always be THEORY, because absolute truth is unattainable.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
so why the arrogence?
einstein approached sceince correctly, you only have to look at the mans quotes he was certain of very little, so much unkown, sceintists have lost that, and become the new preachers interpreting and indoctrinating us with their truth, no one has the coruage to break the illusion that has been created,
paulcmuir 4 years ago
"it is difficult for a man to belive something when his salary depends upon him not beliving it"..........is sceince free and truthfull.........the drugs industry,petrolchemical industries......any sceintist who questions the chemical toxins in the food chain, probally will end up out of a job,how much techologly has been stolen and buried by the people in power, turkeys do not vote for christmas. Sceintists the holders of ego not truth
paulcmuir 4 years ago
paul, stop with the red herrings. If you could prove any of these points individually instead of just blurting out a list of unrelated phenomenon...which there are natural explanations for which you have neglected to research...then we could try to hammer out your hypothesis of these orbs. Otherwise you just sound like a paranoid delusional.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
i will be explaining how the theories effect all these things i mentioned, in a new video its simple string theory not quantum , look at tehter incident in space, look at the energy required for gravity to form planets during the big bang, have you seen all the videos the reaserch data is massive and repeatable, thats sceince
paulcmuir 4 years ago
MORE red herrings. Paul, you are really ill equipped to even begin to talk about string theory...especially since you cannot grasp the basic concept of out-of-focus dust in photography. You have no repeatable research, you're just mistaking an incredibly MUNDANE effect of common DUST for something ethereal. Do me a favor and talk to some camera experts before you REALLY embarrass yourself.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
Some people in the 16thc saw this and is recorded in the museum archives along with the woodcuts, so the villagers account did not happen ...... So now the nurenberg villagers and basil are liers, and through your arrogence you now tell us that did not happen. i think it did,and is an honest account of what they witnessed,why would they lie besides which we have recorded the bars sepperating and dropping spheres as mentioned in the 16thc account.
paulcmuir 4 years ago
the account recalls the fear in the villagers, just imagine that they saw this and it could be seen again,we are more certain this could not happen so we have further to fall if it did,
How can orbs reflect light to mirrors in a garden? again proving distance from lense Denial........denial.......denial.......
paulcmuir 4 years ago
Have you ever taken a picture outside with a flash while it was raining or snowing?
Orbs are nothing more than droplets of moisture or motes of dust...you are building a cult based entirely an a well understood phenomenon in photography...it's like the gang stalking victims who think lens flares are lasers.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
its so simple take two cameras sepperate them take two images together, eventually you will capture orbs in the shared image area which of couse is not infront of the lense our basic trinagulation had that shared image area about 3m away, see all five videos, how about using mirrors, that works as well from that you can scale the size, what about the video?
paulcmuir 4 years ago
It's so simple...because motes of dust and droplets of moisture are real. As long as that mote of dust is in the same volume of space, it will show up on any number of cameras. Did you think that was a real way of setting up a controlled experiment to prove they are supernatural? Because it actually proves MY point that they are totally natural.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
so now we have spheres in the shared camera image area which is three to four meter away from each lense, how big is the dust to be captured that distance from the lense, have a look at the holes in the orbs, prime matter hydrgoen have these holes also been seen in space, recorded in 16thc wood cuts but look at the series first, it may be dust but it was awfull dusty in the bronze age the cullimative case study,
paulcmuir 4 years ago
video matching digital stills so now you are going to tell me they had bronze age cameras, it is due to be seen again that will of course once seen will also be denied.
paulcmuir 4 years ago
video or static images...there is NO difference. I'm not sure exactly what people in the bronze age were seeing since we have no photo evidence of what they saw, so it's yet ANOTHER red herring.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
A lot of Herrings in those days but you would expect that, no commerical fishing fleet to wipe out stocks like 20thc man has done, read the account in the Zurich muesum from the 16th centuary, on the woodcut is a cross, on each end a sphere,unique, also on rock art,Are you suggesting we throw away all the images from hubble,no there is no static in space,electromatic feilds, and the light recorded is only millions of years old,
paulcmuir 4 years ago
So now all equipment gives false readings. as for bronze age man They carved in rock art what they saw, like the events in Basel and Nuremberg in the 16thc
paulcmuir 4 years ago
lmao, do you even know what a red herring is? You just threw yet another one into this discussion. Face it, you don't have a leg to stand on. All these individual and unrelated phenomenon being sewn together into this paranoid tapestry isn't convincing anyone. It's like arguing with a truther.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
This was a process of discovery not something patched together. Like the excuse, "the fossil record will be found!"..... why is it taking so long?....... why don't you talk to the geologists about a time when the earths sedimentary rock process stopped, This is believed by the biologists/ evolutionists so they can keep selling those fish .....
paulcmuir 4 years ago
*face palm*
Red herring much?
The fossil record is there. Go look at it. Go to a museum. Ask to see the real fossil room.
Imbecile...go to a photography studio, ask them what these "spheres" are, they will explain it to you...and you'll probably dismiss it in favor of your comforting delusion.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
So tell me why my mate who's a published Dr of Geology, who donated his fossil collection to the national museum because it was too large, told me in time they would find it (true transitional forms). So when did you get your doctorate, it would not matter anyway your mind is set, there is a massive fossil record, but it still is like a leaky sieve, why do some species return into their original form, so evolution reverses,
paulcmuir 4 years ago
nothing in Darwins theory accounts for it, why do blind cave fish still have the dna for eyes? A quote for you from Enistein "To me the worst thing seems to be a school principally to work with methods of fear, force and artificial authority. Such treatment destroys the sound sentiments, the sincerity and the self-confidence of pupils and produces a subservient subject."
paulcmuir 4 years ago
And one from me............. " and If you are such a product It will take you a lifetime to unpick the truth" I have not posted this for you if it causes you problems I am sorry, in time the science you have been taught will change, what I am observing has been seen since the bronze age
paulcmuir 4 years ago
paul, it upsets me that you begin with such a bold assumption. Lightning has been around since the bronze age. They thought it was supernatural too. We now have a natural explanation for it. Science overturns old assumptions with new evidence. The plasticity of theories is NOT a strike against the scientific method. You fucking idiot. The fact that a theory might be modified or discarded is what makes it SUPERIOR to dogmatism. Yet another red herring.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
"They thought it was supernatural too."
Assumption
"Sceince overturns old assumptions"
Perhaps they did not see it as supernatural
"You fucking idiot. "
The Arrogence of youth
paulcmuir 4 years ago
"arrogance of youth"
Arrogance of old dumb fucks.
"assumption"
It's safe to say that they did not know it had something to do with ionized air.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
when i was one i was looked after, two i was walking, ten i could fish,18 played rugby,26 married ran my own business, 30 had children,48 my birthday tomorrow, got the picture,i deffinatly know more than when i was twenty, that is not the case for you give up your studies of indoctration you know it all as there is nothing you need to learn. god bless you.
paulcmuir 4 years ago
Find a single case where evolution "reverses" and you might have some ground to stand on. I DARE YOU.
Second of all, let me explain what a red herring is since you continually fail to look it up and realize what an infantile method of argumentation it is (which you are employing)
A red herrings is any change of subject that allows you to abandon an argument you are losing in order to make a point on a completely different subject to make it look like you are winning.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
Cave fish after millions year of evolution to create eyes, then loosing them,
paulcmuir 4 years ago
that's not an example of evolution going in reverse. It's an example of an adaptation becoming useless and evolution streamlining the architecture of the brain and body. It's a perfect example of evolution moving foreward...wow you are ignorant.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
so the dna for the eyes remain in the genome sequence of the fish the building block of life,tell me why? Junk dna we know so little 90% unknown but you my freind know why so tell me,
paulcmuir 4 years ago
So, you apparently still have not understood the meaning of the phrase "RED HERRING". Holy fucking cow. Genes get turned on and off all the time, it doesn't mean they disappear and reappear. Junk DNA is NOT junk. It's like all your knowledge of the things you argue against come from JUST laymen sources. Amazing. Did you even take highschool biology?
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
"Holy fucking cow." why are you so rude?
So now we have it 90% of dna is junk, not knowing the majority, effects small portion that is claimed is known, ramdomly take ten pages of 100 page book,so now you can tell everything thats contained in it, 10 mins of a hour documentary, and you know all the auguments, then lay claim sceince has the answer,its just an approximation of the truth. best guess, dark matter 80-90% of our universe is made of it,nothing known about it other than its there,
paulcmuir 4 years ago
it the orb process so now i know 80-90% of the universes processes, in understanding this i begin to understand that i truly know nothing, unlike you my freind who claim to know everything!!!!!
paulcmuir 4 years ago
Stop making assertions that my mind is "set". I'm not on a whim going to accept your poor arguments and flimsy evidence.
Second of all, go to a museum and ask them to show you all the transitional forms. Go on google and find tham. Watch CDK007's video on the abundance of transitional fossils.
Evolution does NOT reverse. You clearly have no understanding of evolution or you would not assert "evolution reverses". Your ignorance is astounding.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
"Face Palm"
Slang on todays youth
paulcmuir 4 years ago
They are not SPHERES. It is astounding how ignorant you are about the WELL UNDERSTOOD effect of motes and droplets. They are OUT OF FOCUS OBJECTS and so they appear as blurry circles. I am shocked by how you are completely unaware of the very VERY basic and thoroughly understood effect of dust in photography.
DeimosSaturn 4 years ago
Looking to the wrong things for answers...
pelagic6 4 years ago
could you let me know what the right things are?
do you except a black christ?
paulcmuir 4 years ago
I have often thought that anm Orb and a fertilized egg look very similar. It is like the small point of energy from which life develops, or is projected. I also don't think "Junk DNA" is "Junk" they just don't understand it - and quite possibly never will. I don't believe in "God" but I believe in Carl Sagan - hope this makes "sense"!!!
Rubyshoes2 4 years ago
Of course, given your attempt at media attention, in due time you might have enough material written about you to make you eligible for 1.000.000 (1 Million) US Dollars by applying for the Million Dollar Challenge of which I'm certain you heard of...
Shurely with such overwhelming evidence you can't possibly fail to win?
jerommeke1701 4 years ago
my work is nothing to do with you, all i am demonstrating is that the ancient people knew this.
if there is a creator,(i am allowed my own veiw)money would be illrevelent,which of course it is,unless you have a god of money. what you worship is up to you !!
paulcmuir 4 years ago
You are assuming then that I worship?
Does any human NEED to worship anything?
jerommeke1701 4 years ago
i think the important thing is loving yourself without condition, ego.... relase yourself from it, as it sepperates from everything.
as for worship look at you last comment about money i do not mean to insult you but that seems like worship to me. religion would have no point, if you could see this process again.......... peace brother.
paulcmuir 4 years ago
At the end of your video you tell us to question things, and yet in your comments you expect us to unconditionally accept your "evidence".
I don't know whether you are a true believer or just hoaxing it to create a debate, but there is something highly illogical about these conflicting demands of us.
jerommeke1701 4 years ago
i am sure that at the end of the video i suggest that you prove it to yourself by getting you cameras out and taking you own images i suggest the best conditions rain ligthening give the quickest results, i will check on the videos i hope i did not leave that out
paulcmuir 4 years ago
is it not clear in this video,that at the end you should question things the next frame ask you to take your own pictures.
paulcmuir 4 years ago
It is absolutely clear, and in fact, I have taken these types of pictures myself even before your videos.
As an avid photographer, I know these effects to be the result of Flash Fotography on unfocussed objects.
Why else would you ask us only to repeat the experiment in rainy conditions?
jerommeke1701 4 years ago
when it rains i see more frogs, are they frogs or rain?
paulcmuir 4 years ago
the last thing i want is people beliving me because i told them too, thats how we got into this mess in the first place. inside everynoe is the source of creation and the fingerprint of the creator. unlocking that what within, will set you free
paulcmuir 4 years ago
You are doing a masterful job of inciting a lot of discussion using the cheesiest crappiest photographic effects ever.
greenatom 4 years ago
i find it strange we can accept images from thousands of light years away(hubble), yet images of energy fifteen feet away we dismiss,many people have a hatred of a concept of a creator you my freind are no exception, keep buying Richard Dawkins books.
paulcmuir 4 years ago
Those "Prehistoric Energy Workers" sure couldn't draw worth a damn.
And they all use the same kind of white paint.
greenatom 4 years ago
look for scandinavian rock art you will see why the archilogists used the same colouring
paulcmuir 4 years ago
Have you ever considered that you may be a lunatic? Have you heard of Cognitive Dissonance? You have walked too far down the path of delusion, it would hurt too much to go back.
tenyar 4 years ago
There are three stages of acceptance of sceince,
1 denyial
2 there may be something in this
3 why didnt i think of it
paulcmuir 4 years ago
Not all theories are denied, some are just ignored until they hit the main stream. Yours is ignored because it is so much like so many other disproved "scientific" theories. It's also not a scientific theory: You make no predictions, and your only evidence is that round things look like other round things. What you have is all feeling, and nothing that is testable.
kaktrot 4 years ago
when the magnetic feild increases it will be seen again,the rotational speed of the earth will quicken due to the reduction in sun spot activity this is not the total picture.i could spend hours explaining light and why it does not have a constant speed.these events have been recorded in rock art and seen in the skies but its still dust infront of the lense,
paulcmuir 4 years ago
Neither sun spots nor any gravitational field has any noticeable effect on the rotation of the earth. Stick figures painted next to a bunch of lines that are perpendicular to other lines is no explanation of the behavior of light. You still have not explained how your "orbs" are any different than blurry pictures of dust which are well-known in photography.
kaktrot 4 years ago
what about fluid, friction and the ice age,i will put it simply, spin a frozen ballon of water,then let it defrost and spin again.the fluid friction causes the earth to slow and the feild to weaken thats not the total story but it enough to explain it, so the little ice age is when we seen it last.
paulcmuir 4 years ago
This video does not answer any of the questions that people have asked you on your previous videos, or the points that were made about dust flecks in the air.
Congratulations, you are now...
Time Cube Guy, Part deux: Energy Orb Guy.
kaktrot 4 years ago
heard of triagulation to calcuate distance missed the bit with the mirrors and reflections shooting with two cameras that are 1.3m apart still its dust infront of lense,no hope, first stager hey.
paulcmuir 4 years ago
The same bit of dust would be in the same place, so two cameras could see it. Ten cameras could see it, that doesn't mean that there is anything there. On top of that, none of the pictures seem to have been taken at the *exact* same time by two different cameras, so triangulation is moot.
kaktrot 4 years ago
refection of orb over the pond and in mirrors?
explain
also if the cameras are 1.5m apart the dust would would have to apppear in the shared image area which of course is not in front of the camera as they are apart this would make the dust rather large.not your strong point i suppose
paulcmuir 4 years ago
In which video, and at what time, have two cameras taken the same picture at the same time. I must have missed that, and I don't want to watch the videos again every time you make a point. I have been trying to find some pictures that you could triangulate in principle.
kaktrot 4 years ago
Also, please point me to the spot in the videos that shows a reflection in the pond or a mirror.
kaktrot 4 years ago
part two
paulcmuir 4 years ago