I just fucked my Anima, she portaled through infinite universes for a visit (she visits often) and we were randy all over the house. Because she's real, it makes for more intense sessions.
Do you think it is possible for Anima (Animus in my case) to find a mate, where the other's animus can relate to your anima and you can therefore have a beautiful relationship? Or is that impossible to you? Just curious... I have the same dillema.
you speak of the logically next dimensional step, which is a real-life relationship between two people: i'll choose to believe in the possibility.
keep in mind that the anima is one thing, related to words like "animation" and "soul" whereas the animus is another, related to words like "animosity" and the english "animus" itself.
as a male psychology, i haven't successfully glimpsed any generic animus concept (yet) --
but, like i said, i choose to believe in the beautiful relationship.
When we are children we are growing the brain we possess now just as much as we are still growing the brain that the 82 year old version of ourselves will be wearing in that distance future. Is it valid to say that I experienced my Anima when I was a child because her name was Karen, she had very colorful hair...Actually it was all the colors of the rainbow and always different from day to day, but no one else could see her....She was very very little and people often sat on her.
I didn't read any othe comments cause I'm drunk and I gotta piss and I'm going to bed after I'm done watching this...But I'm writing a story about this very ideah....except my unique view. I laughed when I heard you say these things because it gave me understanding that there ARE other people out there who think like I do....Which is awesome
I would love to hear more on this topic and everything you just spoke about in the video.
But instead of troubling you with 10 questions, I would appreciate it if you would point me in a direction that would lead to an experience with my own anima just as you did with yours.
This is so incredible. When I was much younger, I had an animus. But I couldn't escape the idea that I was stuck in this universe, so I never met him.
i might suggest that he simultaneously experienced the inability to escape the same idea of being stuck in his universe and that you've thus identified the point where your marriage occurred.
Nice video dude, I only just discovered the anima animus concept and it is a very interesting one. I like it when people just bear their soul on youtube, ur a lot braver than I.
Can i ask how you experienced jane, like in a dream or hallucination???
one more comment, u need to understand that "jane is an entirely seperate personality, and in the event there is a multiverse, in which case ur definitley right about a universe of anima and animus, "jane" would be able to do as she pleases, not just what ur doing now.
in fact everything you said, especially the gross generalizations like "this happens 2 everyone win they fall in love" -- is what i might call "incorrect" meaning you have no data to back that up.
except for "he sounds like a loser..." -- i'm not sure if you have enough data, but it's a lucky guess at worst. i am definitely a loser.
you are at the same time correct and wrong. if there is a multiverse or as he said an infinate number of universes then you have to acknoledge that there is a possiblity that one of those universes jane is doing exactly as what he descirbes her as doing.
jane's will and my will are contraidentical. so she in fact IS "able to do as she pleases," as am i.
this video is not about your "scientific objectivity" but about my metascientific subjectivity.
surely i must have said something like "this video isn't about ideas in physics which are discussed elsewhere already, but rather about an interesting idea/portal for thought experimentation." if i did not, then i behaved irresponsibly, and apologize for wasting your time.
he sounds like a loser at first, but u hav 2 understand that this happens 2 everyone win they fall in love, all that happened was he began communing with his anima without someone it had been projected onto, (ie: someone with the same initial qaulities as his anima) and now that it has fully developed, he cant find anyone that has every detail of its personality
please post a better explanation of my experience. i did not know that anyone else was attempting to explain my experience. sorry this is worse than the other attempts at communicating my experience, i did not know they existed.
for more info about the CONCEPT called anima/animus, you can use a search engine like google or altavista.
but they probably don't have much information concerning this particular experience of mine, for i know not of anyone else attempting to describe my experience (or anyone else having my experience directly, for that matter).
If the goal is to be in a relationship where you will never experience being hurt, then shouldn't the focus be on examining the experience of getting hurt?
You are already aware that your experience of other people is a projection of yourself.
It seems that "getting hurt" is the more mysterious thing and that it would prove a more fruitful exploration.
by the way I realize that I might be wrong and want you to know that I don't mean to offend you in any way...this was just a thought that occured to me inspired by your video.
see "to be in a relationship" probably should not be part of the ends. "never experience being hurt" should be. the need for this experiment probably arose from my confusing "in a relationship" with "being fulfilled" or at least from identifying the former as a prerequisite for the later.
so this experiment is something of a deletion of what is here (indirectly) dubbed "less mysterious thing" so that what is here dubbed "more mysterious thing" can be properly examined.
no need for the disclaimer, especially since your thoughts are not just extremely relevant but extremely welcome.
Hi, thanks for contacting me. I've been waiting for a long time for someone to come along and say what you've said here.
I'm curious about whether you saw her face and body or was it more an abstract experience? I have been doing a lot of reading on these type of concepts and how they shatter (or perhaps challange) the modern view on relationships. I'd enjoy hearing any more experiences or thoughts you have on this.
PS I hope that experience with the silverware was just made up! : )
in universe a, jayme is not doing something other than feeling something other than love for someone who is not someone other than jane.
--
this pair could be called a contracontradiction. we might interestingly note that diction is defined as "choice and use of words in speech or writing."
here the actual content of my experiment becomes infinitely contrainfinite.
when i read(reed) the above pair (in universe b...in universe a...) it says "(to) love."
take this literally (though, mind you, the verb "love" falls away and is replaced by a meta-image pointed to by arcanum vi, which you can find on google images).
[some have asked me about my everyday thought process and i feel that there is sufficient information in these replies to point at my way of thinking rather directly].
I hope She would remain autonomous after penetrating deep into an idea like this. This isn't limited to the animus I would think. I don't know if this is Jungian stuff or what but I'm new to it but I'd guess it wouldn't She/He isn't just a loving songbird or whatever and non existent in depressing relationships. Baudelaire references a writer named De Quincey that wrote on the Ladies of Sorrow I think they're called. Maybe the archetypes you refer to have a bigger span.
I had mentioned that Socrates always said thinking requires a dialogue, and that thinking by oneself is no exception. To think internally, we must be present to ourselves, and although I don't think Socrates (or Plato) mentioned that this pair of myself might be gendered, I'd say Jung was on to something by suggesting that each member of our inner dialogue must have a polar relationship with the other. The male/female persona engages anima/animus when thinking.
And it does seem like the anima, unconscious in men, represents the vital or emotional aspects of the soul, while the animus, unconscious in women, represents the rational or intellectual aspect.
i plan on discussing that whole anima's in homosexuals thing in another video - i tried doing one already but i need one that's less than two hours long, y'know.
how i'm looking at this: if i fuck up what i'm doing, i'll essentially snap and have to be committed. i am fine with that as long as i document what i did such that others can figure out where i went wrong. it's all about contributing to the library, and sometimes that means big sacrifices. whatever, i'll be fine anyway, but thanks for the concern.
I just fucked my Anima, she portaled through infinite universes for a visit (she visits often) and we were randy all over the house. Because she's real, it makes for more intense sessions.
seplrm 1 year ago
Really enjoyed the concepts, nice video.
Fisherdec 2 years ago
Do you think it is possible for Anima (Animus in my case) to find a mate, where the other's animus can relate to your anima and you can therefore have a beautiful relationship? Or is that impossible to you? Just curious... I have the same dillema.
MammaNole 2 years ago
you speak of the logically next dimensional step, which is a real-life relationship between two people: i'll choose to believe in the possibility.
keep in mind that the anima is one thing, related to words like "animation" and "soul" whereas the animus is another, related to words like "animosity" and the english "animus" itself.
as a male psychology, i haven't successfully glimpsed any generic animus concept (yet) --
but, like i said, i choose to believe in the beautiful relationship.
isismelting 2 years ago
When we are children we are growing the brain we possess now just as much as we are still growing the brain that the 82 year old version of ourselves will be wearing in that distance future. Is it valid to say that I experienced my Anima when I was a child because her name was Karen, she had very colorful hair...Actually it was all the colors of the rainbow and always different from day to day, but no one else could see her....She was very very little and people often sat on her.
TheShaneHaley 2 years ago
I didn't read any othe comments cause I'm drunk and I gotta piss and I'm going to bed after I'm done watching this...But I'm writing a story about this very ideah....except my unique view. I laughed when I heard you say these things because it gave me understanding that there ARE other people out there who think like I do....Which is awesome
TheShaneHaley 2 years ago
that was interesting. I am going to dig in more into the subject.
I'll accept this as the video response :]
Braindiscovering 3 years ago
Are you aware that Carl Jung is credited with originating the concepts of anima and animus?
Bodobaas 3 years ago
yes
isismelting 3 years ago
I would love to hear more on this topic and everything you just spoke about in the video.
But instead of troubling you with 10 questions, I would appreciate it if you would point me in a direction that would lead to an experience with my own anima just as you did with yours.
garycheesefry88 3 years ago
after giving your request sufficient thought, i have come up with the following advice.
input "little essays towards truth" into google and press the "i'm feeling lucky" button.
from there you will be presented with the Knowledge necessary for your purposes.
please approach the material, and any material you discover from there on, with the utmost care and scrutiny.
isismelting 3 years ago
This is so incredible. When I was much younger, I had an animus. But I couldn't escape the idea that I was stuck in this universe, so I never met him.
smittens888 3 years ago
i might suggest that he simultaneously experienced the inability to escape the same idea of being stuck in his universe and that you've thus identified the point where your marriage occurred.
isismelting 3 years ago
you are amazing. wonderfull video. what a wonderfull thing to experience.
Thekimbosarahshow 3 years ago
Nice video dude, I only just discovered the anima animus concept and it is a very interesting one. I like it when people just bear their soul on youtube, ur a lot braver than I.
Can i ask how you experienced jane, like in a dream or hallucination???
SpavChilli 3 years ago
i almost had her type an answer, but we felt that even this response is a violation of something sacred.
isismelting 3 years ago
one more comment, u need to understand that "jane is an entirely seperate personality, and in the event there is a multiverse, in which case ur definitley right about a universe of anima and animus, "jane" would be able to do as she pleases, not just what ur doing now.
ikymuffins 3 years ago
obviously not in my imagined universe. it's my universe, how are you possibly going to tell me its rules?
isismelting 3 years ago
in fact everything you said, especially the gross generalizations like "this happens 2 everyone win they fall in love" -- is what i might call "incorrect" meaning you have no data to back that up.
except for "he sounds like a loser..." -- i'm not sure if you have enough data, but it's a lucky guess at worst. i am definitely a loser.
isismelting 3 years ago
you are at the same time correct and wrong. if there is a multiverse or as he said an infinate number of universes then you have to acknoledge that there is a possiblity that one of those universes jane is doing exactly as what he descirbes her as doing.
Thekimbosarahshow 3 years ago
then she's not jane.
isismelting 3 years ago
jane's will and my will are contraidentical. so she in fact IS "able to do as she pleases," as am i.
this video is not about your "scientific objectivity" but about my metascientific subjectivity.
surely i must have said something like "this video isn't about ideas in physics which are discussed elsewhere already, but rather about an interesting idea/portal for thought experimentation." if i did not, then i behaved irresponsibly, and apologize for wasting your time.
isismelting 3 years ago
he sounds like a loser at first, but u hav 2 understand that this happens 2 everyone win they fall in love, all that happened was he began communing with his anima without someone it had been projected onto, (ie: someone with the same initial qaulities as his anima) and now that it has fully developed, he cant find anyone that has every detail of its personality
ikymuffins 3 years ago
why third person here and second elsewhere?
also, though i am DEFINITELY a loser, i am DEFINITELY NOT "fully developed" in any sense of those strange, strange words.
isismelting 3 years ago
not quite the best explanation. u could probably be a little more in-depth about the anima
ikymuffins 3 years ago
please post a better explanation of my experience. i did not know that anyone else was attempting to explain my experience. sorry this is worse than the other attempts at communicating my experience, i did not know they existed.
isismelting 3 years ago
for more info about the CONCEPT called anima/animus, you can use a search engine like google or altavista.
but they probably don't have much information concerning this particular experience of mine, for i know not of anyone else attempting to describe my experience (or anyone else having my experience directly, for that matter).
isismelting 3 years ago
If the goal is to be in a relationship where you will never experience being hurt, then shouldn't the focus be on examining the experience of getting hurt?
You are already aware that your experience of other people is a projection of yourself.
It seems that "getting hurt" is the more mysterious thing and that it would prove a more fruitful exploration.
sabeansiy 3 years ago
by the way I realize that I might be wrong and want you to know that I don't mean to offend you in any way...this was just a thought that occured to me inspired by your video.
sabeansiy 3 years ago
see "to be in a relationship" probably should not be part of the ends. "never experience being hurt" should be. the need for this experiment probably arose from my confusing "in a relationship" with "being fulfilled" or at least from identifying the former as a prerequisite for the later.
isismelting 3 years ago
so this experiment is something of a deletion of what is here (indirectly) dubbed "less mysterious thing" so that what is here dubbed "more mysterious thing" can be properly examined.
no need for the disclaimer, especially since your thoughts are not just extremely relevant but extremely welcome.
isismelting 3 years ago
oh yea, I confused those things too, big time. I think I've got it a bit clearer now, but oh man was that a rough lesson to learn.
sabeansiy 3 years ago
Can I buy some pot from you?
mos619 3 years ago 3
yes!
isismelting 3 years ago
@mos619 this is one of my favorite comments if not the favorite
isismelting 1 year ago
That was fantastic. Awesome food for thought. Thanks.
amabodie2 3 years ago
Hi, thanks for contacting me. I've been waiting for a long time for someone to come along and say what you've said here.
I'm curious about whether you saw her face and body or was it more an abstract experience? I have been doing a lot of reading on these type of concepts and how they shatter (or perhaps challange) the modern view on relationships. I'd enjoy hearing any more experiences or thoughts you have on this.
PS I hope that experience with the silverware was just made up! : )
alexd181 4 years ago
i'v got 2 situation like that , at 5 yo and reacently
bikoshh 4 years ago
I find your idea of the alternate realities in regard to the Anima/Animus interesting. It's almost like a Jungian love story.
I gather you've read Man and His Symbols?
SaturnConsumes 4 years ago
yes and thanks for watching
isismelting 4 years ago
wouldn't the pronouns and nouns be the same but the collective agreement on masculine and feminine backwards?
riverran67 4 years ago
i don't know, i can't remember what i said in this video.
isismelting 4 years ago
i did not understand your question at first, and my snarky reply was inappropriate.
a useful analogy here is the attachment of space and time into a singular, homogeneous fabric.
imagine a digital photograph in an editor. mirror the image vertically. then rotate it 180 degrees.
surely, from there, you will have no problem using thought experimentation to apply this strategy to a three-dimensional object.
what i'm trying to describe here is the application to a four-dimensional construct.
isismelting 3 years ago
in universe b, jane feels love for jayme.
in universe a, jayme is not doing something other than feeling something other than love for someone who is not someone other than jane.
--
this pair could be called a contracontradiction. we might interestingly note that diction is defined as "choice and use of words in speech or writing."
here the actual content of my experiment becomes infinitely contrainfinite.
isismelting 3 years ago
when i read(reed) the above pair (in universe b...in universe a...) it says "(to) love."
take this literally (though, mind you, the verb "love" falls away and is replaced by a meta-image pointed to by arcanum vi, which you can find on google images).
[some have asked me about my everyday thought process and i feel that there is sufficient information in these replies to point at my way of thinking rather directly].
isismelting 3 years ago
surely, from there, you will have no problem using thought experimentation to apply this strategy to a three-dimensional object.
You are more entertaining than you think you are.
riverran67 3 years ago
I hope She would remain autonomous after penetrating deep into an idea like this. This isn't limited to the animus I would think. I don't know if this is Jungian stuff or what but I'm new to it but I'd guess it wouldn't She/He isn't just a loving songbird or whatever and non existent in depressing relationships. Baudelaire references a writer named De Quincey that wrote on the Ladies of Sorrow I think they're called. Maybe the archetypes you refer to have a bigger span.
blindedsun 4 years ago
I think my first comment got lost in cyber space? I'm just testing to see if this one shows up or not...
0ThouArtThat0 4 years ago
I had mentioned that Socrates always said thinking requires a dialogue, and that thinking by oneself is no exception. To think internally, we must be present to ourselves, and although I don't think Socrates (or Plato) mentioned that this pair of myself might be gendered, I'd say Jung was on to something by suggesting that each member of our inner dialogue must have a polar relationship with the other. The male/female persona engages anima/animus when thinking.
0ThouArtThat0 4 years ago
And it does seem like the anima, unconscious in men, represents the vital or emotional aspects of the soul, while the animus, unconscious in women, represents the rational or intellectual aspect.
0ThouArtThat0 4 years ago
and if ya Gay??
zezt 4 years ago 3
i plan on discussing that whole anima's in homosexuals thing in another video - i tried doing one already but i need one that's less than two hours long, y'know.
isismelting 4 years ago
haha, do it and clip the video.
cosmanthony21 4 years ago 2
haha, yeah
zezt 4 years ago
looks like you understand what your talking about, i guess it goes without saying, be careful!
cosmanthony21 4 years ago
how i'm looking at this: if i fuck up what i'm doing, i'll essentially snap and have to be committed. i am fine with that as long as i document what i did such that others can figure out where i went wrong. it's all about contributing to the library, and sometimes that means big sacrifices. whatever, i'll be fine anyway, but thanks for the concern.
isismelting 4 years ago