Added: 2 years ago
From: ForaTv
Views: 10,128
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (85)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Economists should be economists and not physicists. One economist discovered a few years ago, after much research, that there is no return on energy. In other words, there was no process you could use where you put in X amount of energy and got more than X energy out.

    Physicists call this the First Law of Thermodynamics, and discovered it a few hundred years ago.

  • Economists should be economists and not physicists. One economist discovered a few years ago, after much research, that there is no return on energy. In other words, there was no process you could use where you put in X amount of energy and got more than X energy out.

    Physicists call this the First Law of Thermodynamics, and discovered it a few hundred years ago.

  • @BigDeliciousD Tell that to Tesla.

  • al gore did bring to light the warming issue but then immediately attached the co2 as the cause. it was never debated and we listen to scientists who have no expertise in climate or solar activity who are caught up in gore's story. meanwhile no one hears about how 30,000 scientists have filed suit against gore over this lie nor that gore has made made well over a $100 million off of everyone's carbon guilt and government contracts to green companies that he owns. the debate ended before it began

  • @GJonathanWIII WTF are you talking about? Scientists caught up in Gore's story? Science has been studying this much longer than Gore has known about it. Science is what shows there is a direct link between CO2 and warming. Gore has nothing to do with it ... other than as a talking head who makes mistakes. How many of the 30,000 scientists you reference are climate scientists?

  • and believe me our only "trusty" media is this because if u dont do(investigate!) it yourself .................god safe us

  • for ur own safe.... /watch?v=wuj_tlRRQdQ  and research on your own!!

  • proper su__cker!!  check thi vid

    watch?v=wuj_tlRRQdQ

    /watch?v=wuj_tlRRQdQ adn make ur mid by urself!!! plz wake up!

  • The lifetime of carbon emissions is not a hundred years though, it's something like 15.

  • if we collapse the economy that would reduce the greenhouse emissions

  • Carbon dioxide is simply not a problem

    - never has been - never will be.

    CO2 is a normal, natural, part of the biosphere. The sun get's hotter, and CO2 is released out of the oceans. The sun gets cooler, and CO2 goes back into the oceans. It's been like this for Billions of years. Don't believe the pseudo-science.

  • who is this idiot!!the earths getting hotter .Bullshit.

  • @TheRobynhud actually in some parts the earth is getting hotter and weirdly enough slightly colder in others. mainly hotter were it counts though.

  • @NekoLover94when i wrote that comment i was in the czech republic a very cool wet summer with flash floods after incredible rainfall,i watched them clouding the skies with whatever they use its ghastly to watch and my memories of the beautiful czech summers were all i had left.Thats why i feel who ever is planning or doing high altitude spraying of particulates to dim the sun want arresting and imprisoning and they do it in the name of global warming,id rather take my chances.

  • @NekoLover94 Many things are causing a climate shift or change. Man is near the bottom of the causes. This whole scam is for a few to rob the masses some more, that's all this is, these "elites' have info, knowing there would be a change and they "are not letting an opportunity slip by". They use events like this to cash in on the stupid masses who eat up their lies time after time. They lie to us every day, yet, the masses still believe them because they tell us they are "experts".

  • @TheRobynhud This idiot is trying to cash in on tax payers money by pushing the scam. These people(?) have no soul. They are dead.

  • we could just paint all our roofs white which would reflect heat from the sun....am i right?

  • @nuttbush3000 That would reduce your energy costs in the summer (and carbon emissions). Go do it.

  • First 30 seconds he says "strip away right and wrong". What the hell's the point of listening after that?

  • Siggensax, you're right it's called nature

  • Key words are “scientists pretty well understood”science will never be exact!True temperature of the Earth will not be revealed unlessGeoengineering stops!Geoengineering manipulates food prices on the stock market through droughts& floods.Disasters also open up land &water grabs for elite as they take over & rebuild.Bankers cash in while more people go hungry & parish!When people rise up, elitists cash in on war as usual!Take back air,water,land,&sea responsibilities that belong to the people!

  • ChemTrails.

  • Cannabis/HEMP!

  • for beings in Universes in less advantaged realms to create drinking problems resolved. Why live in your harsh , yet comfort filled Universe of NY cities & other big cities which has everything. Your efforts can be used for creating good drinking water for so many beings in other realms using your mindshift to expanding your heart realms........

  • Practical Soulutions to create good drinking water for many disadvantaged beings in other Realms & Universes. You are all kind hearted beings with soft senses & huge minds, but what you create can help much more if you felt the need in your heart realm of kindhearted efforts so that beings like you can be sweeter to create better livable conditions ....

  • I'm sorry to say, but the forums kind beings minds, collectively could be so used for PRACTICALLY heralding some actions within their Heart Realms by verving the beings around them in a kindhearted way to perhaps achieve their dreams practically & also create Hearts kindness. ...cont

  • (It feels like the mission statement of Logitech corp,....which went nowhere ...too much monies/resources/time wasted for middle & upper management& then the smart VP who was instrumental to create an elaborate hoax to reveal to the entire corp........they were really not much ado about anything,& the kindhearted results of that hoax to shift the perspectives of the management never brought out to the public).

  • I'm against the ocean clouds because it sounds like that the method of generating the ocean clouds can be very harmful to the oceanic ecosystems.

  • Today they say that capitalism will destroy the climate. Maybe capitalism will save climate :)

  • This year did the sun have very few "sunspots" (I believe its called in English), this winter was really cold here in Europe too, I assume they might have something to do with each other, since some scientists that does not say the debate is over, says that the climate change might be regulated by the suns activity.. I have a good link for it. Anyways, am I hearing a lot of crony stuff about the global warming etc. I say its not worth it..(going green).

  • these guys are criminals and evil sap sacks.

  • @siggensax

    Google 'CLIMATEGATE'

  • I think some of the debate here misses the point. These guys say to look at the thing in economic terms "costs" and "benefits". Is 2 pct of the world's gdp to reduce co2 reasonable given co2 is actually necessary to life on earth? IF co2 reduction is critical "RIGHT NOW" then what is the most cost effective way to achieve it vs all the cap and trade scam approach? Wouldn't nuclear power plants be important? AGW is a hoax but ways to provide energy efficiently is a good thing..

  • I have a very simple solution to global warming. Quit lying and quit serving Algore he has been proven to be a liar and global warming is in the same category as Godzilla....total fantasy! I can't believe these people are still trying to push this bullshit up hill.

  • Totally un-approved by public and active now, privately and federally under Canado-American treaties. These guys are about a quick buck,

  • I suggest that "global warming" is probably more likely to manifest in an ice age than continued warming. If so, our climate intervention strategy has to accommodate both global warming and global cooling scenarios. Space-based solar power systems could do it either way, low-earth orbits for casting a shadow on the equator, and geosynchronous orbits for not casting a shadow. The space tether (elevator) would be the only way to make this affordable.

  • what about Venus its hot because gases trap heat wouldn't that suggest co2 is warming the earth

  • Fucking weasels.

  • true, fyi - your comments got zapped

  • @surferpeteinspace to understand the problem you have to look at empirical data from scientist around the globe. Discussing what happened in your geographic area as a comparison to the state of the globe is inappropriate. That's like me saying it's a drought in Georgia, therefore the world is heading for drought. I have to look at global patterns to discuss global issues.

  • And as for the topic... geoengineering? "well understood scientifically" ?!?

    Guy, shut up or I will sue your butt into the next best jail ...for life.

    And the worst part is... he even believes what he says... only just a few decades later you'll only get a shameful "How could we have known this would happen?"

    Sorry, but does anyone here truly believe humanity is up for climate technology?

    I mean, come on, the fuck!... as cartman would put it. ;-)

  • Spread the word!

  • "Climate Change" was just debunked!!!...So, you can throw these ideas in the garbage where they belong. Goddess bless those Hackers, They saved the Planet!!!

    Type "Climate-Gate".

    Love.

  • Could you people just stop rating down what doesn't suit your spontaneous gut feelings and go research?

    'hacker IPCC CRU'

    and if that's not enough, watch:

    bit . ly/6UwsL

    And also, for the future, I highly recommend you being a bit more suspicious when it comes to anyone saying "the science is pretty clear" or "all scientists agree that" ...besides, even if that were so, that doesn't add nada to the soundness of the argument.

  • then what does what does it take. Scientist naturally voice look at all perspectives, doesn't mean they think global warming is int happening. We may or may not have higher temperatures, but weather certainly has become more extreme in the last few decades

  • The solution of polluting the upper atmosphere to create climate change

    Is readily accepted and deemed plausible

    by those that have for decades

    denied that polluting the upper atmosphere creates climate change

    And that human activity can create what they refuse to believe humans have created

    Pollutioners that spout ideals of tera-forming Mars

    They believe in greening a foreign planet

    But don't believe it can be done on their own

    And deny that we have any influence at all

  • Wouldnt creating more rain on the ocean mean that there is less rain on the land? Drought?

  • didn't you listen the idea is to send water into atmosphere, so it cant result in less rain.

  • No, its called cloud seeding. Listen to what they said. Clouds doesnt fall on the ocean because there is no dust to form cloud droplets. They kick up salt water, and the salt forms rain droplets (Its not the water they kick up, its the particles).

    But if you seed clouds out on the ocean, then thats water that isnt falling on the land (where the dust is, and where it would otherwise form).

    Though im still pro geoengineering.

  • @Saktoth

    There is no practical limit to how much cloud can form as the ocean`s water is effectively unlimited and the sunlight evaporating in one area has no effect on the sunlight in another area.

    The point is to create more conditions where clouds are likely to form, mostly in areas where we have few clouds forming anyway.

  • @RaymondCorrigan

    Yes, but the clouds arent formed from the kicked up water, but from the salt particles that cause rain droplets to form around them from, the current moisture in the area. If this is moisture that would usually be blown over the land to form clouds -there- instead, will this mean less rainfall over land?

  • @Saktoth

    OK, yeah, this could be a problem in areas very close to land.

    But once the air above the sea becomes dry chemistry kicks in. Moisture will be added at a higher rate because the system will no longer be in dynamic equilibrium (basically the dry air will not be adding moisture to the sea but the sea will to the air).

    Since the temperature/pressure aren`t really affected it would probably return to normal moisture levels, or at least get very close, in a short time (few hours? days?)

  • @RaymondCorrigan

    Air travelling near the surface picks up heat and moisture, but as it rises and cools, it releases this moisture as rain. There are massive systems of high and low pressure in our climate pushing moisture around the atmosphere that cause floods or drought depending on where it falls (monsoons, trade winds, el nino etc). The Sahara exists because of these global air currents. We really need to understand these systems better so we can engage in geoengineering wisely.

  • @Saktoth I couldn't agree more. Even some of the simplest systems have surprised us (game of life replicating a pattern). How on earth can we actually predict every meaningful factor that needs to be taken into account.

    I mean, few days ago CW (and other local San Diego channels) forecasted a clear and hot day in the morning, but the day turned out cold and damp. How could we foresee a global wide side effect when we can't even predict today's weather, and never stop altering the system?

  • What a pile.

  • As if chemtrails arnt already happening.The biggest problem is greedy mofo's,big oil&gov(income from taxxation oil related stuff).Geo engineering does NOT fix the root of the problem.

  • "taxation"

  • lol i never hear about big green. why is that?

  • These types of solutions remind me of turning off the lights by throwing water on the switch.

  • haha I love these crackpot ideas...

  • I thought it was obvious this was a joke. Yet another blunder, apparently.

  • Global Warming is a joke!

    This week computer hackers broke into a server of the University of East Anglia disposing the fraud of glabal warming. In dozens e-mails of the employees of this cebter you can see how they have been fabricating data to prove their theorie.

    They were changing the data instead of changing their theorie.

  • its not any better when they change the theory, look up dark matter and dark energy. Scientist know its happening look at the examples, Venus and earth in the age of the dinosaurs. If we put all the carbon back well have over millions of years similar climate to dinosaur age.

  • Regardless of the quality of the solutions that he proposes, he is absolutely right on one thing: that we need to stop focusing all our energies on complaining how bad things are and start focusing on developing real solutions and that applies on so many levels.

  • Wow, Levitt is a dumb, dumb man.

    He's concerned about the global coordination problems of a carbon tax or market but not of a James-Bond-style weather machine.

  • You don't need any global coordination to shoot sulfur into the stratosphere or to shoot salt water in to the sky. One country or even one rich guy could take care of it all by themselves.

    Cutting carbon emissions however requires the cooperation of every major industrial country in the world.

  • global warming? isn't it called climate change now? who the hell calls it global warming anymore?

  • And it is VERY important what we call it, right?

    Can you tell me why it is so important that we all call it "climate change?"

  • The only "solution" that will be proposed globally will involve taxation and punishment. Why? Because this issue is more about political control and power than about the environment.

  • Earth is getting hotter...so is every other planet in our solar system. I am all for eliminating the use of fossil fuels but this global warming campaign is a hoax in order to implement a new tax.

  • l-o-l

  • why is taxes a big deal anyway, just cut taxes elsewhere or pay down deficits. Its like new taxes is the same as robbery.

  • what next?

  • Ummmm...perhaps you should have watched the news about global warming being the biggest hoax of the century before posting this video, haahaha!!!!

  • these guys are a threat to the system

  • I agree trying to get ordinary people to think for themselves, it just causes things like the thirty year war, better to get people to just vote based on snappy comebacks and slogans

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more