Added: 5 years ago
From: Hefeweizen
Views: 3,599,958
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3,438)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Look up Nikola Tesla.

    Technology is hidden when those that benefit from the energy , monopoly don't find a way to market it.

  • @berny88925 Look up the laws of nature. Conservation of energy for one. Might actually learn something. Beliefs don't go very far, never does.

  • People wonder why this can't be patented and then made into something we all can use. I think the answer is simple and sad - if the powers that be - including the government and the courts - don't want anyone to have the patent on this then THAT'S THE WAY ITS GOING TO BE. But you don't have to have a patent on this to have somebody make such a device for you. I think that there is emerging an underground industry - cash only - where you can get these things. Give this to the world's poor...

  • @ShawnGrayV The problem is that water is NOT a source of energy. What part of that do you not understand?

  • @a1mint Water is not a source of energy - but the hydrogen and oxygen gases released when water is FRACTURED using the Stanley Meyer approach IS a source of energy.

  • @ShawnGrayV Stan Meyers does not stand above the laws of nature. Conservation of energy: you can not create or destroy energy, only convert it.

    Therefore, it takes at least the same amount of energy to split water, than the amount of energy that becomes available in the generated hydrogen.

    What part of that do you not understand?

    *NO* water is NOT a source of energy, because you have to SPEND energy to split water. There can NOT be a net gain.

    What part of that do you not understand?

  • @a1mint Ignorant.

  • @ShawnGrayV No! People that ignore actual science, refuse to use the scientific method, and refuse to consider and understand the laws of nature, are the ones that are ignorant.

  • @ShawnGrayV Stupid Troll is Stupid.

  • Water is composed of two gases - hydrogen and oxygen. Both gases burn. No one disputes this. Two simple questions guys, how much does a barrel of OIL cost? How much does a barrel of RAINWATER cost? It's funny to me how we can post comments but not links to other sites. When these two gases are burned did you know that there is NO POLLUTION created... this would save the planet but we are not allowed to have it because this conflicts with the interests of the wealthy and the powerful. It sucks.

  • @ShawnGrayV A few corrections. Hydrogen and oxygen are elements. Burning hydrogen produces heat, energy, producing water. To split water, it takes at least that same amount of energy. Rainwater is in essence burned hydrogen. Water is not a source of energy, because it's already burned, so to say.

    Now, rinse and repeat.

  • @a1mint Why do I suspect that you are in collaboration with those who wish to suppress this technology? It's either that or you're a complete imbecile.

  • @ShawnGrayV But of course, when delusional quacks like you run out of anything to say, you'll make dumb paranoid statements how the other is "with the oil companies", "with the government", "secret men in black".

    Daaah ok. Rriiggghtt.... so all the scientists are all part of a conspiracy then... rriigghhtt..... You're SUCH a moron...

  • @a1mint Can you at least admit that HHO gas exists? Or is it a myth?

  • So why don't I see this on rods?!

  • I had a little system like this in my small mazda,,a guy rigged it up, but it cna be dangerous ass its converted into a gas which is released into the engine!

  • has this guy been murdered yet to keep the oil and auto companies rich

  • if you dont believe this, you cant understand it

  • This is not a new invention, its called browns gas, or hydrogen, tgis is not free energy, if you use this welder you are going to get a huge electric bill

  • oh, as for this guy patenting his thing... what a dick.  give it to the world for free.

  • GM has a car that runs on seawater - check Top Gear for the info, one episode has Hammond driving the thing around!! of course, it isn't going to come out for 15 years as they have plenty of time still to screw us over OIL...

  • @TheEnergyNow No, GM does not have a car that runs on seawater.

  • Water as a fuel--only if were that easy...

  • @rheevo it already works, don't believe the oil-sponsored propaganda! ever hear of Stan Meyer? do the research.. they took him out in the 80's, stole all his research and killed him - not even a second-thought decision for an industry that makes over a trillion a year.

  • @TheEnergyNow no, it does *not* "already work". Water is not a source of energy, period. And Stan Meyer was proven convicted bona fide in your face utter and over the top uber crook and liar liar liar with his pants on fire.

  • There is car on water in serbia but the world doesnt care

  • @AlexandarProdaction there's also one in Michigan, Byron Bay, Tokyo.... but they ALL have been threatened by big oil, one guy stopped telling people about how he ran his truck on water because they threatened to kill his kids...

  • @TheEnergyNow Just a bunch of fantasy made up bullshit.

  • Stanley Meyer invented this in the 1980's

  • we do get energy from water ..were do you get your e.s.b from..and what gives it energy the sea.

  • We don't need hybrid cars or fuel-cells and we don't need gas or corn-ethanol. look at Brazils sugarcane cultivation. They use a 100% self sufficient extraction of ethanol from sugarcain. every car that runs on gasoline can run on ethanol with NO MODIFICATION, sugarcane dont grow in the usa but Sugar beet and Switchgrass do and can yield a high percentage of ethanol (unlike corn) if they combine solar energy it could probably be 100% self-sufficient - THE PROOF IS THERE FUCK OIL COMPANY'S

  • One problem! the car industry do not like this idear, and will do anything to stop anything that can interrupt their business from making money.

  • @BlueBetaPro you hit the nail on the head there mate :) they make over a trillion a year, how much do you think they'd spend each year to protect it?

  • How America is destroying our planet

    Search For the series

    "THE GREAT DISASTERS"

  • you still need electricity to combine it with water and you obtain that with other resources (pétrol, nuclear energy and other)

  • Those of you who think that water is not a power source, most probably have stocks in the oil business... that's a PERIOD. It's a fact that water is a power source... Today in Las Vegas there are a couple of hotels that run totally on water as a fuel. But, of course it cannot be broadcasted, because it will make bring down the whole oil industry and it's investors. Can you imagine that you can just collect rainwater and run on this for months? Not to mention utilities. The world loves scarcity!!

  • @watusi1971 The oil business has absolutely nothing to do with the laws of nature or how chemistry works.

    What hotels run on water? Please tell me, any link at all? You really need to provide something credible because you're just barfing nothing but bullshit upon bullshit upon bullshit. In fact, you're one of the more bullshittier wackier ones out there on the internets.

  • @a1mint Find out yourself about the hotels... HINT: The technology has stocks on wall street. I hope that helps you out... By the way, I'd rather be a bullshitter and not IGNORANT which makes you a pig. When you live in shit you don't notice the difference...

  • @watusi1971 You're not making any sense. You claim that there are hotels that run on water as a source of energy, and that the company that owns them trade on wall street.

    Seriously, I have no idea where to look for that, because I do not think this exist! I KNOW that water is NOT a source of energy. You are going to have to come up with a link to something credible.

    And keep your temper tantrums in check please, it's making you look dumb.

  • @a1mint The information is out there man... I'm not joking! I know what I'm talking about (Engineer). I send you a link later on... About the temper, the same to you! I'd rather give information than insulting! Cheers...

  • @watusi1971 I do not believe that a hotel can "run on water". Please provide a link, any link. Stop making excuses. Provide a link please.

  • @watusi1971 so... I could not help but notice how you have not provided any links.

  • @a1mint The thing is that even if this guy is full of crap, which he probably is, the laws of science have been proven wrong countless times so even having chemistry in there kinda blows your argument... also what laws of nature? State your laws not the category they reside under.

  • @jerkface38 There is no such thing as the laws of science. The laws of nature have never been found to be incorrect. If any natural law was found incorrect, just about everything scientific would fall apart. Not going to happen.

    Laws of thermodynamics are the key one here. They're only not recognized by scammers trying to sell fraudulent lies.

  • @a1mint you have a point. our "laws of science" are governed only by what we suppose to be correct. magnetism and gravity are an excellent example of what we DON'T know! 5000 years ago we KNEW the world was flat.... these days, we KNOW energy cannot be created nor destroyed (seriously?).... yet hawkins proved einstein wrong...

  • @TheEnergyNow The church thought the world was flat, while they persecuted scientists that said the world was round.

    People thinking that the world was flat or that human flight was impossible, was never science. The laws of nature, that *is* science.

    How did Hawkins prove Einstein wrong btw? Can you elaborate?

    No straw man arguments please !

  • Yep,,people need to WAKE THE F#CK UP, BTW, who one tonight on American idol?

  • What about Stan Meyers' invention? And indeed the chinese and japanese... By the way, what happened to Stan Meyers?

  • @watusi1971 Who cares? Stan Meyer was a convicted bona fide in your face grand master overlord of lying crooks.

  • @a1mint Stan Meyer was not a crook, he just passed away before he could finish what he started. In doing so, he left no provisions to pass the technology on to someone else. That left a lot of people screwed who invested in his product.

  • @powerzap69 Yes, Stan Meyer *WAS* a crook. He made money through impossible claims. That's fraud my friend.

    Water is *NOT* a source of energy. P E R I O D !

  • @a1mint Water is not a source energy. Ohhh! Strong statement! That's true! Stay there, pay $20/gallon gas while I drive a water fueled car for 3 months on one tank. You're completely right! Physics is major league BS and oil is some magic stuff. By the way he didn't die of cancer. He was poisoned! My friend, wake up and smell the coffee. It's totally not convenient for the oil industry to have water replacing it. Oil is scars and water is abundant and available to everyone. Do the math!

  • @watusi1971 The laws of nature are not a choice, they're a fact. Nothing what you said changes anything. Water remains not a source of energy.

    Everything you said is completely unrelated to the subject.

    All just typical straw man arguments.

  • @a1mint You're right and that's the way it should be seen with poisoned mind, until you see me drive by in my water fueled car you paying $20 per gallon of gasoline... or walking!

  • @watusi1971 If you scam others into investing in your "water powered car", you will get sued and you might end up in jail. That also applies if you sell parts related to it.

  • @a1mint I have seen Youtube clips of Stan Meyer explaining his invention. He was no liar. You claim he was a "grand master overlord of lying crooks" - that's a pretty bold statement. Tell me - DO YOU HAVE ANY EVIDENCE TO BACK IT UP??? I think we all know what you're all about, Bud.

  • @watusi1971 I believe he died of cancer before he could complete what he was doing.

  • @powerzap69 No, he was poisoned according to his last words to his brother...

  • learn more about HHO fuel and water fuel device visit

    squidoo.com/simple-water-fuel-­review

  • Comment removed by the Illuminati

  • I's Time for some new age robin hooding!! Come on!

    The science is all here people.. Let's go.. Who's got the mind to understand the science, Who's got the part's, and who's got the financial backings.. Let's go! we are now called "The Energy Group" I don't care what you call it. There are billions of people behind you on this.. get a move on! and we'll get our groove on. =D

  • It's a car that runs on water man!

  • Comment removed by Haliburton

  • The surface of the sun is 5,778 Kelvin, or 9,940° Fahrenheit. So your telling me that this flame is hotter than that? I just don't buy that.

  • @JeremyStaceyMusic the sun is mostily made of hydrogen there for it would be as hot as the suns surface

  • @beetstep HOTTER THAN THE SUN, you see in Kleins Video, Hydroxy will sublimate Tungsten,, FAR HOTTER than the surface of the sun. Hydroxy is elementally reactive,, each element reacts differently, in thermal yield.

    Knute

  • @JeremyStaceyMusic It was a news script error silly XD

  • Saw the documentary called gashole, the first inventor apparently died and the second had death threats.. I wonder what's the deal this time

  • 0:17

    How is that hotter than the surface of the sun? Gotta love the idiots at FOX news.

  • 5 years ago... what happened with this?

  • @ElectricMethod Nothing. This is not an invention at all. I've done electrolysis experiments like this when I was 6 years old. You use electricity to convert water into HHO. And then you burn the HHO to power the engine.

    But here is what they are not telling you. It takes more electrical energy to convert water into HHO than what can be obtained by burning it.

    Obviously, that fact defeats the whole purpose. Hence the "invention" didn't go anywhere over 5 years.

    No conspiracy. Just physics.

  • Comment removed

  • @Gunner3210 not true, if you use the correct frequency you can split the hydrogen and water using hardly any power.

  • @cheergirl99999994 [Citation Needed]

  • @Gunner3210 watch?v=u9XrLOudwRw&feature=re­lated watch?v=nOGAkRkCWfA&feature=re­lated

    Look up Royal Rife's Rife machine, you can find out about frequencies breaking up things including killing cancer cells.

  • @Gunner3210 Stop being so snobby

  • @Gunner3210

    ROFLMAO! You miss the whole point. At the present time, we use pathetic batteries to store solar power. With electrolysis one can use solar power to produce Hydrogen which can then be stored in tanks NOT pathetic batteries.

    Go back to sleep. By the way, every criminal case that involves more than 2 people is a conspiracy. Sleep tight.

  • @parasitesarefunny Storing hydrogen is not that easy. Once that's solved (it's not solved), then you'll want to use a fuel cell to convert that hydrogen to electricity and run electric motors on that. I think one day we will, and yes, hydrogen might very well be the energy carrier. But the big challenge is hydrogen storage and fuel cells.

  • @a1mint If you had watched the clips you would know that Stanley Meyers invention produces hydrogen ON DEMAND - therefore there is no need to "store" it.

  • @ShawnGrayV That's really stupid. TAKING energy FROM the engine, and then converting that energy to hydrogen, and then burning that (hydrogen) energy, what's left of it, can NOT produce a net gain. It is impossible, because it would violate the laws of nature. Conservation of energy: you can not create or destroy energy, only convert it.

    Stan Meyers was a known convicted bona fide in your face crook.

  • @a1mint What the hell does that even mean? Are you drunk?

  • @ShawnGrayV You're *actually* stupid enough where you can't comprehend this? What part of this are you not getting?

  • @Gunner3210 that's not necessarily true. I found a good way of doing the electrolysis method without using energy from any source. In my movies I use a chemical process that's actually too efficient. But you can't discount the fact that this is not polluting our air with carbon. In fact the exhaust that's emitted (nitrogen)plants need to make oxygen. Watch my movie's I posted as a video response here.

  • @powerzap69 You can not create or destroy energy. You can only convert energy. Energy in = energy out. That's a law of nature my friend, and you're not going to break that law, period.

  • I met a guy who was already using this technology, in his HUMMER. That was damned convincing.

  • OMG, I can't believe these claims. "HHO Gas" (scientifically known as a oxyhydrogen mix) is commonly used in welding torches, but is not usable as a fuel for cars. Please read wikipedia about "oxyhydrogen". Very simple chemistry. Nothing magic, no conspiracies. Man, people are dumb.

  • @eric42ca Excuse me!!! Oxy-Hydrogen was the first welding gas,1850s and will test at about 4,200 F. in Open Air. Hydroxy will barely register 260 F. in Open Air. They are NOT the same thing. Hydroxy is a suspension of a very specific “Pre-Manifest” form of energy within the structure of water. (COLD FIRE) Hydroxy has no temperature except a very slight interaction with nitrogen in the air and is totally discriminating in its’ thermal yields based on the materials of contact. Knute

  • @eric42ca I submit Klein has rediscovered Hydroxy,,, because his results and the characteristics of Kleins’ Gas are 100% identical to my work in steels with Hydroxy, 1967. Post within Wikipedia can be written by anyone with an account,,,, and you use this WIKI as your authority???? My suggestion, the person who wrote that entry to WIKI,, has NEVER produced Hydroxy or even anything near Kleins Gas. Knute

  • @eric42ca Its not recommended for long usage on cars as 100% fuel because cars are engineered for gasoline not hydrogen. In my movie's The 1970 ford loved hydrogen better then gas.

  • So were is the cars?? I never hear anything about this.

  • @AwsmUsername get real. Do you really think that the US government wants these cars on the road? Environmentally frendly and inexpensive?? Not making money for the big EXXON companies!

  • @canadianprincess333 It not the government but people within the government and global elitist that do not want this on the road. Oil has made some people way to rich. With inventions like this and others 1% of the world population would not have all the wealth. Would not be able to influence world event. And would never have war like today.

  • @AwsmUsername Canada has been using hydrogen buses for a while now. I think the real question is who is the main supporters of the auto industry? It's the oil companies. What would hydrogen engineered cars do to the oil industry? Cripple it!! Prime example of how slow technology moves in the USA, look at solar power. A simple $5000-7000 would virtually eliminate your electric bill, but you don't see houses mandated to be built with solar panels do you?

  • @powerzap69 The BC Hydrogen bus fleet uses hydrogen that's produced in Quebec and transported many 1000's of miles across the country to BC. The bus carries hydrogen in storage tanks. Fuel cells convert the hydrogen to electric energy, which powers electric motors.

  • @powerzap69 Damn straight.

  • it runs on water man!

  • this video made me thirsty

  • So what's going on now?

  • so what are they trying to patent? the chemical proccess of electrolosis? or his specific design of the fuel cells. because that would just make me mad if the government decides to give this guy a patent from technolegy thats been around for decades.

  • @SeanofZeus appft1[DOT]uspto[DOT]gov/netah­tml/PTO/srchnum[DOT]html

    Search for patent number 20060075683.

    That's the application. I don't know if it's approved or not. I'm not used to reviewing patents.

  • the firsts persons that creat this tech. was the Chinese people.. thank u ;)

  • "...hotter than the surface of the sun"

    Surface of the sun: 5505 °C

    Maximum of HHO flame: 2800 °C

    ...no not really.

  • @TheLivirus Sublimation of pure Tungsten is over 5900 C. SEE: Klein Video, @ 0:30 to 0:34. Knute

  • @OldKnute I didn't find the video. What does sublimation of Tungsten have to do with this? TIG welding is using electricity (not HHO), where the electrode is made of Tungsten.

  • @TheLivirus In the Klein Video above, at 0,30 time tag. The thermal capabilities of ANY flame, is determined by TIME to heat water. (Temperature rise, over time) More commonly expressed in British Thermal Units, BTUs or absolute such as melting points as is used in Kilns. However, HOH or Hydroxy has no specific heat, so as seen in THIS Video, it Sublimates (Change state to a gas without passing through a molten state) Tungsten 5900 c. Boiling Point, 74W is 5,555 C. Knute

  • @TheLivirus Also: Because of the Hyper-Pure flame, Hydroxy(2) is capable of producing the Calc of Gold, SEE: Philosophers Stone. SEE: Ambrosia. (Sumerian Empire). Reputed source of eternal life and the forced tribute paid by humans to the Anunnaki. (Mining Colony EARTH). Therapeutic benefits of Hydroxy(1), “Inhalation Therapies” SEE: The miraculous healing of Michael Faraday. 1845??,,,, or so. Mig Tip,, is 99.9% pure Tungsten,,,, Knute

  • @TheLivirus My answer to the Anunnaki. YouTube search: (I’m Spartacus) "FREEDOM or death:,,,,,, Knute

  • @OldKnute ...you don't make any sense.

  • @TheLivirus It’s a MAP!

    Knute

  • @OldKnute I appeared to have missed your previous comments which explains my confusion. But the thing is I still can't find this "Klein Video" you're talking about. Following the sources on wikipedia the maximum temperature seem to be 3200 C (3473 K).

  • @TheLivirus THIS IS,,, the Klein Video,,,, The one we are posting in, Aquagen. The one above our postings. Denny Klein. Both Hydroxy(1) and Hydroxy(2) will only register 259 F, when tested with Thermograph. Wikipedia knows NOTHING about Hydroxy,,, as they have never tested it. Their results are based on Hydrogen and Oxygen. The Time Tag 0,30 is a point in THIS Video (ABOVE) where Denny Klein sets his torch to a Tungsten electrode,, 99.9 pure Tungsten.

  • @OldKnute Exactly what claims does Klein make about his gas? I browsed his website and all I found was their Aquygen gas "chemically, posses several very unique properties not typically found in other HHO gases". Exactly what properties are is left to imagination.

    Tungsten melts at 3422 C at atmospheric pressure, thus what we observe can't be sublimation. It doesn't even melt.

  • @TheLivirus Well,,, Considering that Hydroxy will burn just as efficiently in a pure vacuum, is a closed loop system of energy,, returns to water after heating materials,,, requires no external oxygen source,,, takes nothing from the air and leaves no ash or poisons,,, is scalable down to Nano-scale,,, Umm?? What about a miniature cigarette lighter for Astronauts?

    Knute

  • @OldKnute "Hydroxy will burn just as efficiently in a pure vacuum"

    Doubt it. The lower pressure should mean that the reaction requires a higher temperature.

    "is a closed loop system of energy"

    Why would it be a loop? External electric energy is used both to electrocute the water and initially ignite the gas.

    "requires no external oxygen source", "leaves no ash or poisons"

    True for any HHO-gas electrocuted from water.

    "is scalable down to Nano-scale"

    What do you mean?

  • @TheLivirus “Scalable” means that Hydroxy needs no external oxygen,,, The prime oxidizer to sustain this reaction, is contained in the Hydroxy mixture itself AND at a perfect ratio for complete and total combustion in a Plasma State. “Plasma” (The forth state of mater) From the size of a STAR,, down to microscopic dimensions. The temperature exhibited by Hydroxy Plasma,,, (In open air),, is 259` Fahrenheit. When in contact with materials, this temperature changes. Knute

  • @OldKnute ...but like I said, the independence of external oxygen is found in any HHO-gas electrolyzed from water. If that's your definition of "scalable" Klein's gas is not unique in any way.

  • @TheLivirus Agreed. This is why I have always supported Klein. My work in Hydroxy, 1967 with the making of Steels, Dr. William Rhoads, 1962 with common-ducted Oxy-Hydrogen, patents for Rhodes 1966. Yull Brown, Browns Gas patents 1977. ALL OF US,, to the man acknowledged (Named in our Patents) and owe primary credit and offer it openly, to Michael Faraday 1830s and 40s. “Scalable”, the ability to set “scale” from the Microscopic or to the size of a STAR. Knute

  • @TheLivirus Look upon this as you may Electricity itself. You can form Electricity by rubbing your feet on the carpet, combing your hair, spinning permanent magnets in within a coil of wire, (AC or DC), or as in Nature, with the swift movement of water vapor within the Earths magnetic field, or Lightning. (See Hydroxy Plasma in the form of Sprites and Jets, I the upper atmosphere) All are forms of of electrical potential are similar,, though derived from different methods. Knute

  • Comment removed

  • What they neglect is that Oxyhydrogen was the first gaseous mixture ever used for welding. The first "water torch" was invented in 1962 by William Rhodes and Raymond Henes.

  • His torch doesn't run on water, but on electricity. Water is just the stuff electricity breaks down to hydrogen and oxygen (H2 and O2 mixture, not bullshit "HHO" as morons started to call it) which he then lights up to produce flame.

    This isn't his invention. It was probably demonstrated way back, when Volta and others were alive. This guy just made a nice apparatus.

    Too bad he's a "water car" con artist. And too bad most American journalists are dumb fucks.

  • @endimion17 William Nicolson and Anthony Carlisle around 1800. More clearly defined and quantified by Michael Faraday 1833. SEE: (Faraday Efficiencies). This is however greatly affected by continuity or trace chemical additives known as, “Electrolytes” (Salts, Acids or Base) or frequency and waveform of currents to be applied or pulsed. My work, 1967, 83% efficiencies P>+W = HOH,,, TO,,, HOH = P<+W at a 5% by volume Potassium Hydroxide “Closed Loop” P = Power W = Water. Knute

  • that was first intruduced in the philippines, man years ago

  • @j12343882 Is that so? Then you better correct wikipedia:

    "The first "water torch" was invented in 1962 by William Rhodes and Raymond Henes."

    ...their names doesn't sound very philippinish to me.

  • if your invention & claims on close loop energy is true, you can be a noble & rich man. my 2 cents advice, look beyond your country ! if the government is not supportive.

    Think out of box !

    Cheers

    hkgan8@gmail.com

  • @hkgan8 Gold, wealth, prizes? To what end? I am blind, crippled and dying, what value hold these things to me? Others will come that know the truth. “COLD FIRE” Healings, furnaces of industry fired from sunlight and water, foods prepared and preserved, homes warmed, breads baked, transportation that will not harm the earth or the atmosphere. I don’t mean to negate what you offer, but if you knew me, you would understand. When these others do this work, give them the gold. Knute

  • @hkgan8 On my worms and coral sands: Not only will you be sequestering CO2,, “Permanently”, but also feeding a “Natural Economy” where the most good is achieved,, from the bottom UP. Worms process Aids, Ecoli, Eboli, smallpox, anthrax and many other harmful pathogens and viruses. Worms can be dehydrated in the sun alone and turned to pellet form. Sacked, stored, and transported with ease as dry, bulk cargo. You want to feed the world? FEED the lakes and oceans!!! Knute

  • FACT: 80% of all waste sent to Landfills,,, is organic. The digestive tract of worms and their immune systems, are stronger than the shark. Secondarily; worms need supplemental grits and fine sands to process their food. These fine sands convert to dissolved mineral salts when digested. Balanced ph achieved by selection of these sand additives. 70% Protein, 30% Fat, worms will double their mass every 60 days and daily, will consume half their weight in waste. Knute

  • so this is not stan meyer?? is this dude still alive thought???

  • STOP MISGUIDING PEOPLE !!!

    "WATER" IS NOT A POWER SOURCE AND NEVER WILL BE !!!!!!!!

  • @bkunal88 (And the Spirit of God moved upon the waters, and God said; “let there be light”, And God saw the light, that it was good.) Excuse me, I did NOT write this. All I did was harness this same process to make STEEL. This force or power is in everything and animates everything and it the source of everything. Just a side note, 3 major religions and about 4 BILLION people on earth, believe this to be TRUE. Manifest in every single feature of existence known. Shout at THEM. Knute

  • @bkunal88 No one will hear you. These people thrive on deceit. They earn money by telling lies.

  • water is not the energy source here, geez

  • fucking oil companys... this guy is died now

  • @tobuscus Did you write that comment before you became famous on Youtube? :D

  • My View? When the Justice Department rushed to look through the charges that Sneddon based this whole fiasco on, (1108 a),, “Crotch Grabbing”,,, coffee blew out their noses,,,, 3 of them fell out of their chairs,,,, and the rush was on to back-peddle and hastily as possible to come up with some excuse to COVER THEIR ASS. Hence, the claim that the FBI were there to protect Michael’s “Civil Rights”. Knute

  • @OldKnute The Michael Jackson discussion ended some time ago.

    I'm suggesting that getting a credible organistation like Greenpeace to confirm and endorse your scientific claims should be very easy and solve all your problems. Get the CEO of Greenpeace to drive a water powered car and your persistent arguments here would come to an end. A good idea yes?

  • @BigDaz MY claims? Hydroxy is used throughout the world. Third generations of my specific designs, are STILL Manufactured by Norinco of China and BEST Korea LTD in Korea. The Machine made by Denny Klein is still available. The Rhoads Machines are available in Phoenix Arizona. The Epoch Energy Machines are available and Epoch makes a conversion for trucks and cars. Exxon is now working on their own design and Exxon claims 80% fuel economy increase. Knute

  • @BigDaz I oppose the wild accusations and misinformation that these systems do not work or are fraudulent. BigDaz, to be fair to you, if you will search HHO, Hydroxy, Water Fuel Cars, Browns Gas, Stan Meyer or any of a thousand Videos on this technology, you will discover this same attempt to Naysay and shout-down anyone who works in Hydroxy or HHO. Do you really think a Video and News report on a Green Peace CEO operating a car would fair any better? Knute

  • @OldKnute I would certainly take notice of a Greenpeace endorsement or a review in a respected journal like Scientific American or Nature. I read BBC Focus myself, it's excellent. The naysayers would simply have to take it seriously because these institutions have respect, power and authority, you and youtube do not.

    You don't think a well funded global campaign backed by Greenpeace would be worthwhile? You'd rather argue with fake people from Saudi Arabia on youtube? It really begs belief.

  • @BigDaz Rather,,, the question should be,,, WHY,, is the rest of the WORLD using this Technology, and anyone connected with Hydroxy in America,,, are DEAD? Or reported DEAD? I post here to offer tests and proofs that anyone can perform in their kitchens, such as the “Tea Kettle” experiment. I like your idea of approaching Greenpeace, a simple letter should do the trick and a list of Companies that can sell them a working unit, referenced here by me. DO IT! With my blessings. Knute

  • @OldKnute Well you're the expert, not me. You could post them a unit, although I think demonstrating it to them personally would be best. I just chose Greenpeace because it's a name people know but any organisation like that could achieve far more than you can alone. I just checked the Scientific American website actually and there's an article that does confirm the process could work if powered by a renewable source such as solar or wind. Although that might not practical for a car.

  • @BigDaz Yes, and there is the POINT. When I came of age,, this was taught in every High School Chemistry class in America. I took that same knowledge and made STEELS. That the article on the Scientific American webpage confirms this, does not surprise me one bit. As for Solar Panels not fitting on a BUS or SUV, a Semi Truck or the roof of a half-mile long Train,,, SEE: My posts about 20 pages back. Knute

  • @BigDaz Here,,,, submit this to Scientific American. Take all the Green Waste we now throw into Landfills,, feed this waste to worms,, feed the MEGA TONS of worms that cleaned up our garbage to fish in the near shore,, let the fish droppings feed the Corals,, and the Corals clean the earth and sequester CO2 permanently as,, Coral Sands. Why will Scientific American reject such a notion? Because it doesn’t require a PhD explain or make to some Corporation RICH. Knute

  • @OldKnute Well again Greenpeace have millions of dollars to spend on these projects. Why aren't you talking to them?

  • @BigDaz We are on our 6th year of you following me. (Kunte, OldKnute), Easy to find. And you advise me on MY TIME? You joined MJNO in 2006, you claim to know Paul, and have MJNO files, you’ve posted quotes here. Ask Paul for the April 2003 Files on my articles,,“NO WMDs” and “Anthrax; Made in America” . Quote them here. DO THIS, and I will buy an Epoch Energy unit, and send it to Greenpeace. BTW, tell Paul, I want the MONEY BACK. Surely he has a job by now. Knute

  • @OldKnute I don't know Paul and have no access to MJNO files. The quotes were taken from my own records.

  • @BigDaz Sooo now,, chew on this? For nearly 6 years,, you have kept files on me? Pause now,, THINK,, 6 years? Know that Paul and I had our disagreements, but always in private. You quoted Paul to say; “I had lied”. You words, many times. HERE. You made it to be that I lied about the FBI. Not a misunderstanding,, NOT a confusion of terms,, BUT AN INTENTIONAL LIE. And from all of this,,, I am to surmise you NOW,,, want to help and guide my efforts? Knute

  • @BigDaz I am overwhelmed with appreciation. THANK YOU! Knute

  • @OldKnute You love me and have considered me a friend for 6 years. You like my idea of approaching Greenpeace. I can't see any need for all this aggression, it was just a suggestion.

  • @BigDaz Excuse me. But you can care for a person VERY deeply and still become exasperated to distraction by their behavior. I asked you to help with a reoccurring vision, my worries over the images of the Swiss Guard moving around as if in military urgency. NOT images of Benedict, but only the distinctive uniforms of the Swiss Guard. You know very well, I would give my life for this man,, “THE MAN”. But not one word or suggestion or insight from you. Nothing from you. Knute

  • @BigDaz As far as Hyrdoxy or HHO,,, There’s millions of independent researchers, hundreds of companies where you can buy GOOD units, not that “Jelly Jar”. Exxon Mobil,,, on and on and on. If I seem overly sensitive at times, forgive my HUMANNESS,, I am NOT perfect. But do remember, they threw me in prison for just suggesting that,, WATER BURNS. If I have not had my films with me to show to the Courts, I would probably STILL be in prison. This road has NOT been easy. Knute

  • @BigDaz Oh,, one last thing. Tell Paul,, His ORIGINAL,,, Tri-Column, “collapsing comments”, “user generated content” Design, is now used all over the world. Most notably, on Facebook and Huffingtonpost. You know me by now, I always give credit where credit is DUE! Young, broke and a beggar,, I STILL think Paul was a “Computer Genius”. Yes, you can quote ME. And do it in a NICE VOICE. Knute

  • @BigDaz Now, I will admit to my “FANATICAL CLAIMS” that Hydroxy Technologies were used to bring down the World Trade Center towers and building 7. I base this on 2 things. The Electro-Magnetic, Magnetometer recordings at the time of the individual buildings collapse, and the presence of Chemical Burns to the lungs of the First Responders and OCPD suffered by the workers. The use of Hydroxy in Mining, has a very specific and distinctive EMP signature. Knute

  • Further; Michael was only charged with CCC (1108 a), at the time of the Neverland Raid. And DA Sneddon and Sheriff Anderson stated at their first Press Conference,,,, “NO PHYSICAL CONTACT”. ALL of the other charges came later,, after the FBI did their homework and realized what Sneddon was claiming, and forced him to return to the Grand Jury process for more charges. In plain English,,, What do the words,, “No physical Contact” mean to you????? Knute

  • idiots you cant create energy its against the laws of physics this is pure garbage go educate yourselves

  • the inventor has been murdered and the technology still exists but the goverment makes sure no-one uses it

  • @olegign81 Just use Solar Power and your own Urine,,, Problem solved. If you will note in the video, the combustion of Hydroxy returns to WATER and is re-condensed and purified. YES,,, Water to a Gas,,, use the energy suspended in Gas,,,, and it returns to WATER. That’s right,,, A closed loop energy system where NOTHING is wasted,,,, OH MY! Knute

  • I Wonder if the car has (a fiber glass air cooled engine) THAT MAKES IT RUN ON WATER MAN!

  • @0me3s lol im watching that right now man XDDD

  • This guy has been killed a few years back..... C'mon guys...it's a conspiracy....If we stop buying oil, the government doesn't have as much control over us

  • @hungoverontues Read here at length and you will see this FEAR. “Don’t Believe your OWN EYES,, it’s Photo-Shop.” ,,,, “Don’t listen, they only want money.” When no money was ever asked for. “Don’t be deceived, it takes more energy than is produced.” When Solar and Wind to produce Hydroxy in the first place,,, are FREE….. FACT: ANY internal combustion engine runs on AIR,, the fuels only expand that AIR…. FACT: All fuels,, INCLUDING HYDROXY,,, were once,, WATER. Knute

  • i think this guy is soon to desapear...

  • The Dance, round and round and round. To Jordan: Prepare, seek assistance from everyone you have honor and friendship to lay up stores; grains, sheep, goats, medicines, iodine, preserved foods of all types you are offered. Guard and preserve your water in underground reservoir. ASK; and all the people of earth will send assistance to you. JUST ASK. From the west and north, the suffering will come. Be ready. BUILD NOW and prepare. Knute

  • THIS WAS MADE IN 2006! LOOKS LIKE THEY MADE HIM DISAPPEAR TOO! IF YOU INVENT,SOMETHING KEEP IT TO YOURSELF! DONT TELL THE ENEMY YOUR GOVERNMENT. 

  • @xavierz71 A bit too late. Millions now conduct this work. “And the Spirit of God moved upon the WATERS. And God said, let there be light, And God saw the light, that it was good.” Governments may try to repress this knowledge, bathe in their greed and exploitations of the earth, WARS for oil that destroy Nations, but in time, all will use this force,,, and use it,,, FOR GOOD. All the best, Knute, TR Knudtson