100 billion neurons, wow! that's 1/2 the number of stars in the milky way galaxy. so Imagine one neuron as just our sun in this vast galaxy and that's the equivalent of two neurons.
what makes these cells act the way they do? what makes they travel and do all the things they do? this is what I fail to understand in the theory of evolution. Does that happen just because? is that were God comes in the picture? or does science have a different view?
@SoulTears1 The organisms in which the cells act wrong (for whatever reason) die because they are not adaped to the environment. Their genes are not passed to the next generetion, and everything works fine in the next generation. If there is a random mutation which makes the cells act better, organism with this cells is adapted to the environment better than the other organisms, and therefore it will live longer and have more children. Gradually, these cells will be more common in the population
I love how you say, first came the neuron. Like, where the hell did it come from. Oh wait, God formed it from the dust of the ground. I can also make UP a beautiful story on how an OR LOGIC gate became a PC. First came the OG, and then,, came the NOR, and then XOR, and then came the NOT, and AND, and NAND, and the 555 timer, WOW..................................
@mejc2: I like the ouat analogy. You have to be an absolute idiot to accept; and then later on, and later on; and later on. What, are all these neurons nicely floating inside a special womb. How can these things possibly survive, and why the hell would they want to. Just because you know how chemistry works, doesn't mean you know how life came about. There's so many gaps in your explanations, but u just want to shove them down the throats of ignorant baby atheist.
you too are ignorant, you self righteous religious freak, you cant deny everything except what you believe, and only what YOU believe. Plus explain how he "shoves" it down throats? Obviously you would only end up on this page if you had some kind of interest in this stuff. Its not like its on TV or the radio. Lastly, since you seem to not believe this stuff, why dont you leave and let those who do, enjoy it.
THANK you for this video, in particular. I FINALLY learned something new from it,
about the origin of neurons from bacterial predecessors.
Everything else I have ever read about neurons and the brains, either on the internet or in my basic psychology course, repeats the same old basic Psych 101 material on neurons, axons, myelin sheaths, and synapses.
Long term memory works by a nerve cell repeating the nerve impulse over and over again. That's why repetition increases how long u can retain memory? tht makes sense.
As I click from vid to vid I often forget to rate or comment, so while I'm thinking of it I just want to say thanks for all the work you do to present these science lessons to laymen like me. I love your stuff and always look forward to seeing another.
the only thing missing is ONCE UPON A TIME, LONG AGO AND FAR AWAY. observing the existence of organs systems and body plans is a useful endeavor. However, making up stories about how these things came to be is probably detrimental to science.
Some of these things seem like they make so much sense once they are laid out and explained. This is looking back on it though. I know that this information is the product of countless hours of exploration by scientists and biologists. And I salute them!
@SelfPromoting I think our lives should be based on evidence and not faith personally.Because faith isn't a way to truth.Faith is believing claims from old books and people who likely don't know any better. Faith leads to believing 72 virgins like the Muslims do haha It literally can lead you into any of the 4,300 religions. I became atheist recently, but it wasn't because of evolution, it was because of a philosophy class and learning about evidence based thinking, but I happen to know evo well
@SelfPromoting If you look up genetically modified crops and animals, you will find stuff like glow in the dark pigs, pet lizards, fish, gigantic fish, cows, pigs, stuff like cloning, etc. Its all because genes are able to be changed. There ARE errors in replication. To a biology major, I am planning on being a doctor. I just took my evolution/ecology class and got a B. It was actually the most interesting. The scientists aren't lying about fossils.. There is so much to learn in this world..
@SelfPromoting predicting what animal populations will change due to environmental changes is done by ecologists. HIV is a virus that is hard to stop because its changes in DNA. In fact, a lot of the same viruses come around each year with different strands because of evolution. A good thing that evolution is applied to is with bacteria and modified crops. Geneticists can insert genes into crops to change them, because dna is able to be altered. We have bigger fish, high protein corn, and other
@SelfPromoting And yes 99.86% of phds in the natural sciences accept evolution. There was a court case "Edwards v. Aguillard" that had 72 NOBEL prize winners sign that evolution should be taught in schools. That is why we have nobel geneticists, nobel prize winning evolutionary biologists, etc. Its because this fact is useful in the world. DNA changing has many indications for the medical realm. Cancer is caused by changes in proteins that block tumors. black skin vs white skin is evolution
@SelfPromoting Macro evolution is the same as "micro evolution." What they both mean is changes in dna. One is for a short time, which you will see smaller changes, one is for a longer time, meaning bigger changes. Macro and micro evolution are one in the same thing. lots of micro-evolutions added up means bigger changes. People dislike the notion of evolution because they want to feel as if we are more special than other animals. Its human arrogance and religion that keeps science from going
@SelfPromoting Yes, a different kind of animal will never come from one species. You may have a mutation that causes a fifth leg or something, but it is likely that this fifth leg is not beneficial. There is a mutation in which people have 6 fingers. Its quite cool and I hear the trait is dominant, meaning it will be passed onto children easier. Yes small changes over time make animal generations look more and more different as selection chooses which traits are best in which environment. .
@SelfPromoting Well due to changes in the genome, changes are a fact. This occurs in the production of sex cells sperm and eggs, which have to be made via cell replication. Since dna replication, done by dna polymerase, has errors, we end up having changes in protein structure. If in fact there are changes, then evolution occurs. Which religion are you? If Christian, just know that many, many, many Christians accept evolution. To me, its not a matter of choice though. Dinosaurs with men is crazy
@SelfPromoting So, basically, what I am getting at is that due to sexual selection, drift, and natural selection animal generations will likely "evolve" on this continuum of biodiversity. Even humans will change (i doubt we will get dumber, because girls like smart guys :)) But things like female choice will influence what traits are passed down. So social structure, etc will affect evolution. Sorry, I seemed to say some unimportant things, did I answer your question?
@SelfPromoting independent of natural selection, this occurs because not all traits affect how many children an organism has. There is sexual selection which mainly means that females choose which male to mate with based on traits. Based on their preferences, males with orange spots for example, will be chosen for, having nothing to do with natural selection. Orange would be beneficial for passing genes down because its more likely they will get to breed.
@SelfPromoting But due to changes in the environment, (humans moving from Africa to other, colder, temperate, places) people aren't subject to harsh sun, they may not be subject to the lack of vitamin D any longer. So, upon moving to a different area, something else will be selected for. Evolution does not stop. It all depends on who has children and who doesn't in order for changes and in biology, there is a term called "drift." drift is when random genetic variations fluctuate independent of
@SelfPromoting What happens in life is genetic variation throughout the generations. One child may have a mutation that leads to better absorption of vitamin D (lighter skin color and blue eyes are affected by a common gene) Lighter skin color leads to more vitamin D intake. When other people tend to have less children because of their lack of vitamin D for instance, the population tends to lean towards more lighter skinned people. Harsher sun leads to darker skinned people in the same way.
@SelfPromoting Evolution is a continuum. It continues as long as there are surviving replicating lifeforms with changable dna. If the DNA wasn't changable, you'd have no evolution, but due to changes in the environment including temperature, density of predators, types of predators, water supply, shade, etc, you will have an ever changing population. To get a better grasp of this, think of "transitional" forms. We, right now, are a transitional form. Everything on earth is a transitional form
@SelfPromoting So the reptile brain, which you can look up controls a lot of the vital functions etc, the neocortex is where you store all your information and where a lot of things occur such as communication, etc. Remember, light is a transfer of energy, touch is a transfer, sight, taste, etc. The best structures get chosen for, but remember evolution is not a ladder of progression, but instead chooses what works best in an ever changing environment.
@SelfPromoting the "reptile" brain, a structure that all mammals have in common with all reptiles too, is a smaller structure below the "neocortex" part of the brain that mammals have only. The reptile brain is structurally made to govern the actions of the heart, the lungs, and other simple "stay alive" aspects of animals. It is rather primitive and is not very capable of learning. This is why many reptiles are "dumb" and aren't smart pets. But many mammals are smart.
@SelfPromoting Remember, light also causes electrical signals. Its called the photoelectric effect and chemicals and elements such as lithium are prominently used in cameras, chlorophyll in plants and bacteria, and other structures such as those in the eye, light sensitive bacteria. So in total, only the "structure" of the brain is chosen for by evolutionary processes. The things that we learn are from our environment.
@SelfPromoting Also, the "words" of DNA called codons, made by ATC and G, will change, proteins will be made, and by copies of DNA occur. This leads to more synapses being created. Natural selection will likely choose more synapses if an animal needs intelligence to survive rather than brawn. Having synapses and electrical signals can be beneficial in organisms that do not need to be intelligent as well. Such beneficial things include movement, muscle stimulation, and light awareness.
@SelfPromoting since genes code for proteins, the proteins which are coded by 3 letter "words" called codons, if a structure such as these was made by the proteins and if it was beneficial, natural selection would choose the best structures. Since the more synapses, the more intelligent, then natural selection will choose, if needed to survive, the best structures to do so. Thus we humans, and other apes find it more beneficial to have larger brains. This video describes the structures
Oh, and BTW, don't you EVER scold us for "making shit up" (even though we aren't) and say that "only ignorant people would fall for that shit," when YOU'RE the dumbass saying that the universe was magically *poofed* into existence BY MAGIC from a "god"! You wanna talk about being ignorant?! HOW ABOUT THAT?!?!
Now THAT's ignorance! Fuckin' retard! I honestly hope you eventually go back to high school and get the education you clearly missed out on as a child. Because you clearly ne
You know, dude, there *is* actually a difference between being "indoctrinated by atheism" and "graduating high school!"
Seriously, if you honestly believe what you typed in your two comments below, go to your nearest adult education center and sign up IMMEDIATELY. What you said was by FAR the most stupidly ignorant thing I've ever heard, and you CLEARLY need an education!
"Only ignorant people would believe atheism"? Really? Are you really that fucking retarded?
It's the common logic of the brain to think this way. With the absence of God, the brain is force to take another route. But it doesn't mean that this is possible. Without a creator, there's no creation.
Your videos are pure absurdity. That's like saying that a computers created themselves. You can teach this nonsense to ignorant ppl, but not to smart ppl. Anybody who accepts this, has been indoctrinated by atheism. And its understood, atheist have no other choice but to make something up.
@cmpresents Sorry that we make your medicine and have nobel prize winners who improve your standard of living signing our anticreationist teaching in schools. Look it up :) 72 of them signed an anticreationist petition for a court case. Also the Royal society, a bunch of scientists from around the world endorses evolution and 99.86% of biologists accept evolution. I'm sorry that us doctors, and scientists are fooled by "atheist" education. Too bad a lot of Christians will tell you the opposite
Finding how the brain works is like cutting water with a knife...Through I think studies can come close as to find out the processes of the brain, the brain is so complex that its highly impossible to find out everything about it. The brain is the most mysterious thing in this World!
I would disagree with the 3 axioms which he states. Consider single cell creatures have computational capacity without a brain yet they function and survive just fine.. There might be more than just the macro scale definition of a brain (ie neuron, synapse and circuit).. Maybe a brain has a micro-scale component ie individual neuron memory/processing ..
@DNAz5646 But what role does a neuron play in a single cell creature? It has no individual charge carrying and transmitting unit. If anything it has a centralized processor (the nucleus) more akin to a modern computer, it has circuits though and possibly synapse like elements..
Single cell organisms have no neurons...unless you have seen brain creatures.
Singles cell organisms are a bunch of 1 type of cell. All they do is sit there and every cell does their thing.
It looks like they are surviving and doing stuff intelligently but everything adapts to the environment.
They are not "smart" in a sense but look like they thought about where they are/go ect....but thats because they dont form just anywhere the environment has to fit. conditions move it moves. Moves to fast?
@ddnguyen278 Its cells disperse and die. You wouldn't think much for the Carbon dioxide when you open a cola. You know why the foam forms and dispersers. You wouldn't say its smart (leaving out life) because it happened when it was supposed to. Single cell creatures coming together is like that. They dont go...hey lets chill out together...they from because the environment manipulates it.
Oh I forgot, and a neuron is just a switch, like the switch in a computer, and if you magically connect all these billion of switches just in the right way, you create consciousness. Please tells us more.
First came the neuron, it magically appeared. Then another neuron magically appear and started talking with the first neuron, the story goes on and on, and they all lived happily ever after.
@1971SuperLead If you want to play that game, on a sub-atomic level there is no diference to your omputer and a rock but youre still able to write to me.
But things work with all its parts and the parts interact with eachother.
@Sweddude If you were interested enough in Quantum science and the study of the effects of thoughts on matter....you would learn that forms do not create reality. It is reality that creates forms.
We'll never fully understand how our brain works... simply because we need a more advanced brain to explore it.. The complexity of our neuron networks is the same of the universe complexity.. We are condemned not to know and we use our fantasy to explain the macro-cosmos and micro-cosmos.. Life is not fair...
@Sexomaniakos4ever Lol dude listen to what you're saying - "we need a more advanced brain to explore [our own]" - Errr so how about the THOUSANDS of brains co-operating as one to try to figure out how one single brain works? I'm referring of course to the scientific community, who use the same reasoning and deduction we single brains use to work out comparatively simple problems, to effectively become a mega-brain analysing single brains.
One problem near the end, but not a large one. While you claim that all the processes there can occur with just four neurons, in order to have a differences in "signal strength" you need more neurons, since each neuron has almost the exact same signal strength.
@SQuiRR3LM0nk3y would be nice if he posted some links on the video, but I'm not sure if CDK is still active on youtube, I guess you could try to look at the papers shown in the video?
to all people, believe me that the worst enemy that you could ever have is your own brain, when brain starts playing dirty tricks on you. when you start to get fck up on the head. it's dooms day for you. and you cannot scape or hide from your own brain. most of you won't know what I'm talking about unless you live it. peace to everyone's brain and soul, hope your own brain never turns against you.
Yup.. i thought about it and wondered why anybody on earth would worry about this why there is a child or any other person starving to death on this earth? This is the difference between freaks like you and me... This is the difference between the humans and the idiots who try to see what humans are when the answers are there staring you in the face.
People fail to realize that evolution's explanation for ZERO transitional forms is punctuated equilibrium. This theory says that most evolution happens ONLY during small spurts of time. For some inexplicable reason, EVERY animal evolves ONLY during these times. This is the only thing that would explain ZERO transitional forms in living creatures today OR in the fossil record. Hence, the theory of PE. It's not science, it's circular logic. PE proves evolution which proves PE.
@tpstrat14 you completely misunderstand "PE". If you read, for example, "Evolution as Fact and Theory" by Gould who came up with PE instead of some creationist you would understand. PE only explains the lack of transitional fossils for small changes, like between two species of shellfish. But if evolution is rapid we would still expect transitions for large changes like between reptiles and mammals, the example Gould gives, and these are the transitions we do find very often.
Wilhelm Roux,, wrote a book in which he suggested that the development of an organism results from a Darwinian competition between the parts of the embryo, occurring at all levels, from molecules to organs. In recent years, a modern version of this theory has been proposed by Jean-Jacques Kupiec. According to this cellular Darwinism, stochasticity at the molecular level generates diversity in cell types whereas cell interactions impose a characteristic order on the developing embryo.
@PaladinConstantin The Catholic, Eastern Orthodox as well as eastern orthodox and many many other protestant sects say they agree with evolution and that God set it in motion from the big bang, so technically much much less than 6bn people actually agree with you, and 99.9998% of all biologists actually disagree with you. There are many many more Hindu and Islamic creationists than there are Christian. Seems like'you refuse to see'how things got here, even though they've spelled it out for you.
@Slip819 slash the second Eastern Orthodox I meant Methodist. That evolution takes place and did take place is established by an overwhelming wealth of evidence and is demonstrably true in many cases, none of it points to an intelligent anything, unless your willing to except that there's a ton of really stupid design too, but I don't think you're a deist. Even then it's not falsifiable and it's a bear assertion, so it's not science.
You are all over the place, you should explain things in detail, in circuit detail, and give reason for all your explanations, you keep jumping from point to point. Scientist don't understand how a cell works, and yet you jump all this information without explain it and you keep running, and you expect intelligent people to swallow what you say. I want you to break the cell apart and tell me exactly how it works and why it wants to survive.
You say, first came the neuron, you have no idea what came first, what you are saying is not science, is not fact, it's your believe. You say; "a neuron is simple a cell, really, that's similar to what Darwin said about the cell. Nothing you have said so far explains anything, you are just describing what already has been written in science books. Let me ask you, does a cell feel pain. Can you explain pain through mathematics.
One by one, the bible (words of god, they say) disproved by the science.
They should have woken up some 400 yrs ago when Galileo said earth is moving around the sun. Now who still believes that the earth is flat and sits on top of a big turtle?
Longer they hold on to it, more embarrassing when they have to admit that they were wrong.
Isn't it about time separate your belief and reality then leave the science to the scientists?
@allgoo19 One by one, Sciencetific THEORIES are catching up to religion. We still live in a world where time is linear, but every rotation of the earth around the sun is different, thus Time is not a constant, thus the speed of light has not been measured correctly, thus most scientific fact is now bullshit.
@allgoo19 Our concept of time is based on the gregorian calendar which is wrong because every year the length of a year changes, every now and again this calendar needs to be updated, thus the speed of light as defined in modern science is not constant, it is variable. The source is my own brain thank you very much, I refuse to be a sheep to the "modern" world, move ahead people.
@Christopher1987uk >>the gregorian calendar..is wrong because every year the length of a year changes It's wrong because the earth day lasts less than 24hrs. That's why a day is added on leap years. >>this calendar needs to be updated Explained above. >>the speed of light...is not constant Wrong. It is measured in seconds, nothing to do with the calendar. >>it is variable. We have repeatedly verified it's constant. >>The source is my own brain How are you supposed to know if you're wrong?
@gininginin The speed of light can sill be a variable, light can take the form of either a wave or a stream of particles called photons, when in particle form light is still affected by laws which affect other substances, thus it can slow down, modern scientists have still to prove this theory wrong and there are many experiments to back this up such as the slit experiment, where light shining thorugh a small slit can appear to be in two places at once, sharing many similarities with electrons.
Obviously when I say the speed of light is constant I am referring to light in a VACUUM. It is known that light speeds down when traversing different matter like glass and water. This was known for a long time and isn't in debate, and the phrase 'modern scientists have still to prove this theory wrong' really doesn't apply here.
Sigh once and for all I want to explain the double slit experiment to you people. The reason that the outcome changes with measuring it is due to the fact that measurement devices interfere and change the results.
Such as when trying to determine where an electron is, one must use a laser and when the photons are bouncing off the electron to determine it's location it changes momentum. Less you about position more you know about speed and vice versa.
@allgoo19 Time is not a CONSTANT, every year the rotation of the earth around the sun is different, so to measure light in metres per second, or miles per second or anything to do with time is wrong because every year the length of a year is different, it also explains all the holes in modern physics.....
"every year the rotation of the earth around the sun is different.."
Google, "Speed of light, Wiki"
Scroll down to "measurement"
There are 5 different ways to measure the speed of light. Only one of them involves rotation of the earth which can be corrected while other methods are not related to rotation of the earth.
Go take a look and tell me which method you are talking about.
It maybe originated there but shared by many other religions.
Like many parts of bible, you can find similar stories such as resurrections of god etc, actually originated in other religion which was taken from a calendar activity, at least that's what heard.
Robert Boyle 1627-1691 Founder Modern Chemistry. He financed translations of the Bible, into Irish,Turkish,& Arabic Author,"The Christian Virtuoso"study of nature for Christians. In his WILL, financed"Boyle Lectures"in defense of Christianity."From a knowledge of His work, we shall know Him.Christ's passion,His death,His resurrection and ascension,and all of those wonderful works which He did during His stay upon earth, in order to confirm mankind in the belief of His being God as well as man."
Simple, Get two crayons and mix then in a test tube? End result is a test tube filled with crayon. now mix a sperm and and egg from two humans it creates What?
humans alive, create life. Crayons not alive, creates no life.
@syazwankhan You keep making this assertion about 'life only coming from life', but do you have any actual evidence that this is the case? You know anything that can actually back up the claim your making?
@syazwankhan Your so called 'claim' is so fractally flawed anyway that it is almost hilarious. Life can only come from life, so therefore God must be alive, which then begs the question of what made him if he is alive? Or maybe God isn't 'alive' he is out of time and space and you say, which then breaks your claim. Like you say life can only come from life, so if God isn't 'alive' how did he make life? However it doesn't matter because God is outside of logic isn't he? Give me a break...
@ClosedAperture "which then begs the question of what made him if he is alive?" If God is made or created, He wouldnt be God. The question itself is fallacy, it doesnt make sense.
@syazwankhan Your logic is the thing that doesn't make any sense. 'Life has to come from life.' You are just claiming this as a fact, yet you still haven't given me any evidence to say this is true. When I then use your logic and apply it to God by saying that if God is alive and intelligent then what made him, you simply say well God is God so he doesn't abide by the same logic...
@syazwankhan It is called special pleading, you are using your 'logic' as some kind of proof of God, yet the 'logic' your using doesn't apply to the very thing your trying to prove. I don't think you could provide a better example of fallacy if you wanted to... Yet again, you have zero evidence to support the existence of God...
@ClosedAperture Muhammad (Pbuh) was the first Muslim among his own people, Jesus (pbuh) was the first Muslim among his people, Abraham(Pbuh) was the first Muslim among his people, same goes to Moses and the other prophets mentioned in the Quran. The Quran is simply saying that a particular prophet was the first to submit to God among his people. Sorry for the late reply. Muslims around the world are going through the fasting month now so i dont really spend much time on the computer.
@shoulderkolibri@shoulderkolibri Thats not what he meant. He is trying to highlight his point that only life can create life. Non-life can create nothing.
The video is great but unfortunately discussion underneath is turning religious very badly. Please guys if you have any problems with his findings then bring some intelligent work up on youtube :)
@syazwankhan Nope, you don't understand what scientific theory means. It is not the same as the colloquial definition of theory that is more generally used. Wikipedia can be your friend again, look it up.
@ClosedAperture Physical theory such as gravity is accepted because its something that can be proven by observing and doing experiments. But this "Origin of Brain" theory is not proven. Theres no hard evidence.
@syazwankhan Again you don't understand what a theory is, CDK007 video isn't a theory it is a hypothesis based on several theories. Again you might want to look up what a hypothesis is. There is evidence, did you not watch the actual video? Which piece of evidence did you not find satisfactory?
@syazwankhan There is evidence... The whole video is full of evidence? A hypothesis is based off evidence? I think your very confused... You can sit there and say there is no evidence, but there actually is...
@syazwankhan Yes your right, however that doesn't mean there is no evidence to support this hypothesis, it wouldn't be a hypothesis if there wasn't evidence. Anyway what is your point if this hypothesis hasn't be proven, heck it could even be all wrong, so what?
@ClosedAperture I asked u how the brain have the ability to think and cause emotions. And u told me to view this video. The problem is this hypothesis has not been tested and proven. So it is not useful.
@syazwankhan We have some understanding of how the brain has the ability or think and makes us feel emotions. This video sums up what we know, and why we think it works the way it does pretty well, but your right we don't 100% know how the brain evolved or how it works. Again, so what if we don't know?
@syazwankhan What? So you just suddenly jump from we don't know how the brain works to therefore there must be a God? You moron, how do you just come to that conclusion? And even if we do follow your absurd logic about intelligence having to create intelligence, what made your God then?
@ClosedAperture Now you're insulting me and calling me a moron. That really reflects your character. I didnt say "we don't know how the brain works to therefore there must be a God". What im trying to say is that the intelligence of the brain reflects on the intelligence on that entity that cause it. Again, only intelligence can cause another intelligence. LOGIC.
@ClosedAperture This proves the existence of a superb intelligent being called God. Just look and study how intelligent the brain is. Its logic and common sense. Non-intelligence cant cause intelligence. Only intelligence can cause intelligence.
@syazwankhan Its not logic or common sense, you just can't think of any other way it could have happened so therefore it must be God. Its an argument from ignorance.
love the video man
osclarkos 2 days ago
This is a great video
msjessypp 2 days ago
This is a great video
distractionxx 1 week ago
100 billion neurons, wow! that's 1/2 the number of stars in the milky way galaxy. so Imagine one neuron as just our sun in this vast galaxy and that's the equivalent of two neurons.
deanmullen10 1 week ago
Where is the video "The Origin of cognition"? I cannot find that video. :(
leraquendee 1 month ago
But the world was created 6,000 years ago. Therefore, evolution is impossible.
TheLoserKingdom 3 months ago
@TheLoserKingdom Of course, I'm joking
TheLoserKingdom 3 months ago
@TheLoserKingdom lol
Sciborg09 2 months ago
what makes these cells act the way they do? what makes they travel and do all the things they do? this is what I fail to understand in the theory of evolution. Does that happen just because? is that were God comes in the picture? or does science have a different view?
SoulTears1 3 months ago
@SoulTears1 The organisms in which the cells act wrong (for whatever reason) die because they are not adaped to the environment. Their genes are not passed to the next generetion, and everything works fine in the next generation. If there is a random mutation which makes the cells act better, organism with this cells is adapted to the environment better than the other organisms, and therefore it will live longer and have more children. Gradually, these cells will be more common in the population
filek1011 3 months ago
@SelfPromoting humans ARE creating other species right now. That's the next metalevel in evolution.
trisky1234 3 months ago
231 people have imaginary friends.
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago
Why did I find that paramecium so cute looking?
ross817 4 months ago
@ross817 because it is.
its so adorable trying to navigate by bumping into things, and its tiny little body contracting and expanding. its very cute.
tuseroni 2 months ago
F@%$ ! This is too confusing...I'm going to read the bible!
xtmn8 4 months ago
@xtmn8 The Bible is confusing too... :)
StrikaAmaru 3 months ago
Very interesting, also loving all the troll bellow.
TiteProducts 5 months ago
229 people don't own a brain.
krillthefish 5 months ago
I love how you say, first came the neuron. Like, where the hell did it come from. Oh wait, God formed it from the dust of the ground. I can also make UP a beautiful story on how an OR LOGIC gate became a PC. First came the OG, and then,, came the NOR, and then XOR, and then came the NOT, and AND, and NAND, and the 555 timer, WOW..................................
cmpresents 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cmpresents
Where did God come from then?
kurtu5 5 months ago
@mejc2: I like the ouat analogy. You have to be an absolute idiot to accept; and then later on, and later on; and later on. What, are all these neurons nicely floating inside a special womb. How can these things possibly survive, and why the hell would they want to. Just because you know how chemistry works, doesn't mean you know how life came about. There's so many gaps in your explanations, but u just want to shove them down the throats of ignorant baby atheist.
cmpresents 5 months ago
you too are ignorant, you self righteous religious freak, you cant deny everything except what you believe, and only what YOU believe. Plus explain how he "shoves" it down throats? Obviously you would only end up on this page if you had some kind of interest in this stuff. Its not like its on TV or the radio. Lastly, since you seem to not believe this stuff, why dont you leave and let those who do, enjoy it.
Opinionguy1 5 months ago
the electrical sinapses are also found in the electrical system of the heart
shadowmax889 5 months ago
I am convinced that if creationists took a biology sequence in college we would have far less of their ignorant drivel in public forums.
uniteordie1 6 months ago
@uniteordie1
I think we would have a lot of week two drops.
kurtu5 5 months ago
I can picture the faces of hundreds of ignorant bible thumping creationists after watching this video with smoke pouring from their ears.
uniteordie1 6 months ago
THANK you for this video, in particular. I FINALLY learned something new from it,
about the origin of neurons from bacterial predecessors.
Everything else I have ever read about neurons and the brains, either on the internet or in my basic psychology course, repeats the same old basic Psych 101 material on neurons, axons, myelin sheaths, and synapses.
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello u forgot dendrites which transfer the ion signal to the neurons =)
Glitchedcatcher 5 months ago
Long term memory works by a nerve cell repeating the nerve impulse over and over again. That's why repetition increases how long u can retain memory? tht makes sense.
robobrain10000 6 months ago
As I click from vid to vid I often forget to rate or comment, so while I'm thinking of it I just want to say thanks for all the work you do to present these science lessons to laymen like me. I love your stuff and always look forward to seeing another.
anothernullifidian 6 months ago
WTFUCK I have no idea what this man just said
geoff1424 6 months ago
the only thing missing is ONCE UPON A TIME, LONG AGO AND FAR AWAY. observing the existence of organs systems and body plans is a useful endeavor. However, making up stories about how these things came to be is probably detrimental to science.
mejc2 7 months ago
Mind = Ecitatorally blown.
Thanks!
Some of these things seem like they make so much sense once they are laid out and explained. This is looking back on it though. I know that this information is the product of countless hours of exploration by scientists and biologists. And I salute them!
Pernic10us 7 months ago
@SelfPromoting I think our lives should be based on evidence and not faith personally.Because faith isn't a way to truth.Faith is believing claims from old books and people who likely don't know any better. Faith leads to believing 72 virgins like the Muslims do haha It literally can lead you into any of the 4,300 religions. I became atheist recently, but it wasn't because of evolution, it was because of a philosophy class and learning about evidence based thinking, but I happen to know evo well
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting If you look up genetically modified crops and animals, you will find stuff like glow in the dark pigs, pet lizards, fish, gigantic fish, cows, pigs, stuff like cloning, etc. Its all because genes are able to be changed. There ARE errors in replication. To a biology major, I am planning on being a doctor. I just took my evolution/ecology class and got a B. It was actually the most interesting. The scientists aren't lying about fossils.. There is so much to learn in this world..
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting predicting what animal populations will change due to environmental changes is done by ecologists. HIV is a virus that is hard to stop because its changes in DNA. In fact, a lot of the same viruses come around each year with different strands because of evolution. A good thing that evolution is applied to is with bacteria and modified crops. Geneticists can insert genes into crops to change them, because dna is able to be altered. We have bigger fish, high protein corn, and other
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting And yes 99.86% of phds in the natural sciences accept evolution. There was a court case "Edwards v. Aguillard" that had 72 NOBEL prize winners sign that evolution should be taught in schools. That is why we have nobel geneticists, nobel prize winning evolutionary biologists, etc. Its because this fact is useful in the world. DNA changing has many indications for the medical realm. Cancer is caused by changes in proteins that block tumors. black skin vs white skin is evolution
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting Macro evolution is the same as "micro evolution." What they both mean is changes in dna. One is for a short time, which you will see smaller changes, one is for a longer time, meaning bigger changes. Macro and micro evolution are one in the same thing. lots of micro-evolutions added up means bigger changes. People dislike the notion of evolution because they want to feel as if we are more special than other animals. Its human arrogance and religion that keeps science from going
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting Yes, a different kind of animal will never come from one species. You may have a mutation that causes a fifth leg or something, but it is likely that this fifth leg is not beneficial. There is a mutation in which people have 6 fingers. Its quite cool and I hear the trait is dominant, meaning it will be passed onto children easier. Yes small changes over time make animal generations look more and more different as selection chooses which traits are best in which environment. .
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting Well due to changes in the genome, changes are a fact. This occurs in the production of sex cells sperm and eggs, which have to be made via cell replication. Since dna replication, done by dna polymerase, has errors, we end up having changes in protein structure. If in fact there are changes, then evolution occurs. Which religion are you? If Christian, just know that many, many, many Christians accept evolution. To me, its not a matter of choice though. Dinosaurs with men is crazy
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting So, basically, what I am getting at is that due to sexual selection, drift, and natural selection animal generations will likely "evolve" on this continuum of biodiversity. Even humans will change (i doubt we will get dumber, because girls like smart guys :)) But things like female choice will influence what traits are passed down. So social structure, etc will affect evolution. Sorry, I seemed to say some unimportant things, did I answer your question?
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting independent of natural selection, this occurs because not all traits affect how many children an organism has. There is sexual selection which mainly means that females choose which male to mate with based on traits. Based on their preferences, males with orange spots for example, will be chosen for, having nothing to do with natural selection. Orange would be beneficial for passing genes down because its more likely they will get to breed.
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting But due to changes in the environment, (humans moving from Africa to other, colder, temperate, places) people aren't subject to harsh sun, they may not be subject to the lack of vitamin D any longer. So, upon moving to a different area, something else will be selected for. Evolution does not stop. It all depends on who has children and who doesn't in order for changes and in biology, there is a term called "drift." drift is when random genetic variations fluctuate independent of
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting What happens in life is genetic variation throughout the generations. One child may have a mutation that leads to better absorption of vitamin D (lighter skin color and blue eyes are affected by a common gene) Lighter skin color leads to more vitamin D intake. When other people tend to have less children because of their lack of vitamin D for instance, the population tends to lean towards more lighter skinned people. Harsher sun leads to darker skinned people in the same way.
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting Evolution is a continuum. It continues as long as there are surviving replicating lifeforms with changable dna. If the DNA wasn't changable, you'd have no evolution, but due to changes in the environment including temperature, density of predators, types of predators, water supply, shade, etc, you will have an ever changing population. To get a better grasp of this, think of "transitional" forms. We, right now, are a transitional form. Everything on earth is a transitional form
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting So the reptile brain, which you can look up controls a lot of the vital functions etc, the neocortex is where you store all your information and where a lot of things occur such as communication, etc. Remember, light is a transfer of energy, touch is a transfer, sight, taste, etc. The best structures get chosen for, but remember evolution is not a ladder of progression, but instead chooses what works best in an ever changing environment.
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting the "reptile" brain, a structure that all mammals have in common with all reptiles too, is a smaller structure below the "neocortex" part of the brain that mammals have only. The reptile brain is structurally made to govern the actions of the heart, the lungs, and other simple "stay alive" aspects of animals. It is rather primitive and is not very capable of learning. This is why many reptiles are "dumb" and aren't smart pets. But many mammals are smart.
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting Remember, light also causes electrical signals. Its called the photoelectric effect and chemicals and elements such as lithium are prominently used in cameras, chlorophyll in plants and bacteria, and other structures such as those in the eye, light sensitive bacteria. So in total, only the "structure" of the brain is chosen for by evolutionary processes. The things that we learn are from our environment.
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting Also, the "words" of DNA called codons, made by ATC and G, will change, proteins will be made, and by copies of DNA occur. This leads to more synapses being created. Natural selection will likely choose more synapses if an animal needs intelligence to survive rather than brawn. Having synapses and electrical signals can be beneficial in organisms that do not need to be intelligent as well. Such beneficial things include movement, muscle stimulation, and light awareness.
iliveon 8 months ago
@SelfPromoting since genes code for proteins, the proteins which are coded by 3 letter "words" called codons, if a structure such as these was made by the proteins and if it was beneficial, natural selection would choose the best structures. Since the more synapses, the more intelligent, then natural selection will choose, if needed to survive, the best structures to do so. Thus we humans, and other apes find it more beneficial to have larger brains. This video describes the structures
iliveon 8 months ago
Thank you for posting this
iliveon 8 months ago
@cmpresents
Oh, and BTW, don't you EVER scold us for "making shit up" (even though we aren't) and say that "only ignorant people would fall for that shit," when YOU'RE the dumbass saying that the universe was magically *poofed* into existence BY MAGIC from a "god"! You wanna talk about being ignorant?! HOW ABOUT THAT?!?!
Now THAT's ignorance! Fuckin' retard! I honestly hope you eventually go back to high school and get the education you clearly missed out on as a child. Because you clearly ne
macgeek2004 8 months ago
@cmpresents
You know, dude, there *is* actually a difference between being "indoctrinated by atheism" and "graduating high school!"
Seriously, if you honestly believe what you typed in your two comments below, go to your nearest adult education center and sign up IMMEDIATELY. What you said was by FAR the most stupidly ignorant thing I've ever heard, and you CLEARLY need an education!
"Only ignorant people would believe atheism"? Really? Are you really that fucking retarded?
Oh, and BTW, don
macgeek2004 8 months ago
It's the common logic of the brain to think this way. With the absence of God, the brain is force to take another route. But it doesn't mean that this is possible. Without a creator, there's no creation.
cmpresents 9 months ago
Your videos are pure absurdity. That's like saying that a computers created themselves. You can teach this nonsense to ignorant ppl, but not to smart ppl. Anybody who accepts this, has been indoctrinated by atheism. And its understood, atheist have no other choice but to make something up.
cmpresents 9 months ago
@cmpresents Yes, it is all made up, despite all the evidence supporting it. You have just been confirmed for retardation.
Jammium 9 months ago
@cmpresents Sorry that we make your medicine and have nobel prize winners who improve your standard of living signing our anticreationist teaching in schools. Look it up :) 72 of them signed an anticreationist petition for a court case. Also the Royal society, a bunch of scientists from around the world endorses evolution and 99.86% of biologists accept evolution. I'm sorry that us doctors, and scientists are fooled by "atheist" education. Too bad a lot of Christians will tell you the opposite
iliveon 8 months ago
Finding how the brain works is like cutting water with a knife...Through I think studies can come close as to find out the processes of the brain, the brain is so complex that its highly impossible to find out everything about it. The brain is the most mysterious thing in this World!
dagreatcapri82 9 months ago
I love how misleading the title is. "Rudimentary explanation of basic cognitive functions". DERP
wbish001 9 months ago
I would disagree with the 3 axioms which he states. Consider single cell creatures have computational capacity without a brain yet they function and survive just fine.. There might be more than just the macro scale definition of a brain (ie neuron, synapse and circuit).. Maybe a brain has a micro-scale component ie individual neuron memory/processing ..
ddnguyen278 10 months ago
@ddnguyen278 Its a a bunch of chemical reactions..not much difference from the first enzymes but the scale.
DNAz5646 10 months ago
@DNAz5646 But what role does a neuron play in a single cell creature? It has no individual charge carrying and transmitting unit. If anything it has a centralized processor (the nucleus) more akin to a modern computer, it has circuits though and possibly synapse like elements..
ddnguyen278 10 months ago
Single cell organisms have no neurons...unless you have seen brain creatures.
Singles cell organisms are a bunch of 1 type of cell. All they do is sit there and every cell does their thing.
It looks like they are surviving and doing stuff intelligently but everything adapts to the environment.
They are not "smart" in a sense but look like they thought about where they are/go ect....but thats because they dont form just anywhere the environment has to fit. conditions move it moves. Moves to fast?
DNAz5646 10 months ago
@ddnguyen278 Its cells disperse and die. You wouldn't think much for the Carbon dioxide when you open a cola. You know why the foam forms and dispersers. You wouldn't say its smart (leaving out life) because it happened when it was supposed to. Single cell creatures coming together is like that. They dont go...hey lets chill out together...they from because the environment manipulates it.
DNAz5646 10 months ago
Great Videos! Well informed, and quite interesting. :D
IAmMe4u2night 10 months ago
Where is the information stored? Like memory.
ThomasWinkworth 10 months ago
Oh I forgot, and a neuron is just a switch, like the switch in a computer, and if you magically connect all these billion of switches just in the right way, you create consciousness. Please tells us more.
onetocome 11 months ago
First came the neuron, it magically appeared. Then another neuron magically appear and started talking with the first neuron, the story goes on and on, and they all lived happily ever after.
onetocome 11 months ago
This is amazing! Obviously, God was behind all this.
1971SuperLead 1 year ago
@1971SuperLead All right, "obviously".
gabastabas 11 months ago
@1971SuperLead dude..
BiggieSmalls66 10 months ago
@BiggieSmalls66 The brain is not the mind.
1971SuperLead 10 months ago
@1971SuperLead Yes it is, without the brin there is no mind.
Sweddude 10 months ago
@Sweddude The brain is a concept inside the mind.
1971SuperLead 10 months ago
@1971SuperLead No, the brain is a physical object that is what we are and is controlled by chemical and electrical signals.
Sweddude 10 months ago
@Sweddude But what is a physical object? On a subatomic level you cannot see a difference between a brain and a rock. Can a rock think?
1971SuperLead 10 months ago
@1971SuperLead If you want to play that game, on a sub-atomic level there is no diference to your omputer and a rock but youre still able to write to me.
But things work with all its parts and the parts interact with eachother.
Sweddude 10 months ago
@Sweddude The reason I can write to you is because the computer is all in our mind as well. The computer is merely a concept as the brain is.
1971SuperLead 10 months ago
@1971SuperLead No thats just like asuming we are all staring in the matrix wich we have no reason to belive.
Im sorry but im not in the mod to discuss philosophy at the moment but if i where this could get intresting.
Sweddude 10 months ago
@Sweddude If you were interested enough in Quantum science and the study of the effects of thoughts on matter....you would learn that forms do not create reality. It is reality that creates forms.
1971SuperLead 10 months ago
Very informative. I'm looking forward to the next video.
AtheosPhyve 1 year ago
An excellent and informative video. Still data processing does not entail awareness, as we do a great deal of processing unawares.
dfpolis 1 year ago
I don't see an "Origin of Cognition" video.
MidoriFan10 1 year ago
These videos are always so incredibly informative. I can only imagine the immense amount of work that goes into each one. It really is amazing.
MidoriFan10 1 year ago
@MidoriFan10
Always more convincing than the 'opposition', which is usually some guy sitting in front of a webcam babbling away.
luminaeus 1 year ago
Awesome. I learned something.
estragon9 1 year ago
227 losers on the planet
Neueregel 1 year ago
@Neueregel
Nah 1 loser with a votebot :)
sefario666 1 year ago
VERY nice show you have put on. Great explanation.
Aresftfun 1 year ago
full marks again.
stratocaster539 1 year ago
We'll never fully understand how our brain works... simply because we need a more advanced brain to explore it.. The complexity of our neuron networks is the same of the universe complexity.. We are condemned not to know and we use our fantasy to explain the macro-cosmos and micro-cosmos.. Life is not fair...
Sexomaniakos4ever 1 year ago
@Sexomaniakos4ever Lol dude listen to what you're saying - "we need a more advanced brain to explore [our own]" - Errr so how about the THOUSANDS of brains co-operating as one to try to figure out how one single brain works? I'm referring of course to the scientific community, who use the same reasoning and deduction we single brains use to work out comparatively simple problems, to effectively become a mega-brain analysing single brains.
hmspinaforethisisspa 1 year ago
One problem near the end, but not a large one. While you claim that all the processes there can occur with just four neurons, in order to have a differences in "signal strength" you need more neurons, since each neuron has almost the exact same signal strength.
Golkarian 1 year ago
CDK, could you message me the link to get the papers used or sources?
SQuiRR3LM0nk3y 1 year ago
@SQuiRR3LM0nk3y would be nice if he posted some links on the video, but I'm not sure if CDK is still active on youtube, I guess you could try to look at the papers shown in the video?
Golkarian 1 year ago
to all people, believe me that the worst enemy that you could ever have is your own brain, when brain starts playing dirty tricks on you. when you start to get fck up on the head. it's dooms day for you. and you cannot scape or hide from your own brain. most of you won't know what I'm talking about unless you live it. peace to everyone's brain and soul, hope your own brain never turns against you.
1800levso 1 year ago
Excellent in content and visuals! Thank you!
duzyureks 1 year ago
wow you educated 62,937 people for free. you sir, are the type of person who will save the world.
misnoto 1 year ago
Yup.. i thought about it and wondered why anybody on earth would worry about this why there is a child or any other person starving to death on this earth? This is the difference between freaks like you and me... This is the difference between the humans and the idiots who try to see what humans are when the answers are there staring you in the face.
dew02005 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People fail to realize that evolution's explanation for ZERO transitional forms is punctuated equilibrium. This theory says that most evolution happens ONLY during small spurts of time. For some inexplicable reason, EVERY animal evolves ONLY during these times. This is the only thing that would explain ZERO transitional forms in living creatures today OR in the fossil record. Hence, the theory of PE. It's not science, it's circular logic. PE proves evolution which proves PE.
tpstrat14 1 year ago
@tpstrat14 you completely misunderstand "PE". If you read, for example, "Evolution as Fact and Theory" by Gould who came up with PE instead of some creationist you would understand. PE only explains the lack of transitional fossils for small changes, like between two species of shellfish. But if evolution is rapid we would still expect transitions for large changes like between reptiles and mammals, the example Gould gives, and these are the transitions we do find very often.
Golkarian 1 year ago
Origin of cognition plz?
airandfingers 1 year ago
Wilhelm Roux,, wrote a book in which he suggested that the development of an organism results from a Darwinian competition between the parts of the embryo, occurring at all levels, from molecules to organs. In recent years, a modern version of this theory has been proposed by Jean-Jacques Kupiec. According to this cellular Darwinism, stochasticity at the molecular level generates diversity in cell types whereas cell interactions impose a characteristic order on the developing embryo.
FOXTERRY 1 year ago
Wonderful!
shirehorse9 1 year ago
Are microtuble's those voltage gated ion channels??
MindsEyeTaijutsu 1 year ago
subscribed!
behnamasid 1 year ago
Very impressive. You actually seem to know what you're talking about. Gave you a thumb up and added to my favorites.
DrDeist 1 year ago
@PaladinConstantin The Catholic, Eastern Orthodox as well as eastern orthodox and many many other protestant sects say they agree with evolution and that God set it in motion from the big bang, so technically much much less than 6bn people actually agree with you, and 99.9998% of all biologists actually disagree with you. There are many many more Hindu and Islamic creationists than there are Christian. Seems like'you refuse to see'how things got here, even though they've spelled it out for you.
Slip819 1 year ago
@Slip819 slash the second Eastern Orthodox I meant Methodist. That evolution takes place and did take place is established by an overwhelming wealth of evidence and is demonstrably true in many cases, none of it points to an intelligent anything, unless your willing to except that there's a ton of really stupid design too, but I don't think you're a deist. Even then it's not falsifiable and it's a bear assertion, so it's not science.
Slip819 1 year ago
where is the origin of cognition video?
vickmackey24 1 year ago
Sorry it's actually 186,282 mps (speed of light) or 670,000,000 mph
KnifeSniper69 1 year ago
Comment removed
drche420 1 year ago
You are all over the place, you should explain things in detail, in circuit detail, and give reason for all your explanations, you keep jumping from point to point. Scientist don't understand how a cell works, and yet you jump all this information without explain it and you keep running, and you expect intelligent people to swallow what you say. I want you to break the cell apart and tell me exactly how it works and why it wants to survive.
cmpresents 1 year ago
You say, first came the neuron, you have no idea what came first, what you are saying is not science, is not fact, it's your believe. You say; "a neuron is simple a cell, really, that's similar to what Darwin said about the cell. Nothing you have said so far explains anything, you are just describing what already has been written in science books. Let me ask you, does a cell feel pain. Can you explain pain through mathematics.
cmpresents 1 year ago
It must suck to be a christian.
One by one, the bible (words of god, they say) disproved by the science.
They should have woken up some 400 yrs ago when Galileo said earth is moving around the sun. Now who still believes that the earth is flat and sits on top of a big turtle?
Longer they hold on to it, more embarrassing when they have to admit that they were wrong.
Isn't it about time separate your belief and reality then leave the science to the scientists?
allgoo19 1 year ago
@allgoo19 Can you tell me where in the bible the big turtle is? I'd like to see that.
Copsweet 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Copsweet
"Can you tell me where in the bible the big turtle is? I'd like to see that.."
Can you tell me where in my comment says "bible says so."? It's your interpretation.
It's a folklore believed by chrsitians in general, and some still believe it.
This is what bible says, "Adam lived 900yrs." So much for a book of truth, heh?
Do you believe in bible?
allgoo19 1 year ago
@allgoo19 One by one, Sciencetific THEORIES are catching up to religion. We still live in a world where time is linear, but every rotation of the earth around the sun is different, thus Time is not a constant, thus the speed of light has not been measured correctly, thus most scientific fact is now bullshit.
Christopher1987uk 1 year ago
@Christopher1987uk
"speed of light has not been measured correctly.."
That's an intersting comment.
Care to provide the source?
allgoo19 1 year ago
@allgoo19 Our concept of time is based on the gregorian calendar which is wrong because every year the length of a year changes, every now and again this calendar needs to be updated, thus the speed of light as defined in modern science is not constant, it is variable. The source is my own brain thank you very much, I refuse to be a sheep to the "modern" world, move ahead people.
Christopher1987uk 1 year ago
@Christopher1987uk
"The source is my own brain thank you .."
That means it's only your opinion never been approved in academic society?
You are funny....
Have you thought about publishing your opinion and have those scholars take a look?
allgoo19 1 year ago
gininginin 1 year ago
@gininginin The speed of light can sill be a variable, light can take the form of either a wave or a stream of particles called photons, when in particle form light is still affected by laws which affect other substances, thus it can slow down, modern scientists have still to prove this theory wrong and there are many experiments to back this up such as the slit experiment, where light shining thorugh a small slit can appear to be in two places at once, sharing many similarities with electrons.
Christopher1987uk 1 year ago
@Christopher1987uk
Obviously when I say the speed of light is constant I am referring to light in a VACUUM. It is known that light speeds down when traversing different matter like glass and water. This was known for a long time and isn't in debate, and the phrase 'modern scientists have still to prove this theory wrong' really doesn't apply here.
gininginin 1 year ago
@Christopher1987uk sorry nit-picking, it's two slits, otherwise you aren't showing that the single photon is going through both slits.
Golkarian 1 year ago
@Christopher1987uk
Sigh once and for all I want to explain the double slit experiment to you people. The reason that the outcome changes with measuring it is due to the fact that measurement devices interfere and change the results.
Such as when trying to determine where an electron is, one must use a laser and when the photons are bouncing off the electron to determine it's location it changes momentum. Less you about position more you know about speed and vice versa.
JamesCizuz 10 months ago
@Christopher1987uk
"thus most scientific fact is now bullshit..."
Google, "speed of light, Wiki"
---" the value of the speed of light in vacuum is exactly 299,792,458 m/s"
And what was your point of your comment? Science is wrong so the bible is correct? Pretty stupid argument.
allgoo19 1 year ago
@allgoo19 Time is not a CONSTANT, every year the rotation of the earth around the sun is different, so to measure light in metres per second, or miles per second or anything to do with time is wrong because every year the length of a year is different, it also explains all the holes in modern physics.....
Christopher1987uk 1 year ago
@Christopher1987uk
"every year the rotation of the earth around the sun is different.."
Google, "Speed of light, Wiki"
Scroll down to "measurement"
There are 5 different ways to measure the speed of light. Only one of them involves rotation of the earth which can be corrected while other methods are not related to rotation of the earth.
Go take a look and tell me which method you are talking about.
allgoo19 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Christopher1987uk
"it also explains all the holes in modern physics..... "
No reply?
allgoo19 1 year ago
@allgoo19 the big turtle is a Hindu belief, or if not believed by any Hindus anymore it is in their texts.
Golkarian 1 year ago
@Golkarian
"the big turtle is a Hindu belief,.."
It maybe originated there but shared by many other religions.
Like many parts of bible, you can find similar stories such as resurrections of god etc, actually originated in other religion which was taken from a calendar activity, at least that's what heard.
allgoo19 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Robert Boyle 1627-1691 Founder Modern Chemistry. He financed translations of the Bible, into Irish,Turkish,& Arabic Author,"The Christian Virtuoso"study of nature for Christians. In his WILL, financed"Boyle Lectures"in defense of Christianity."From a knowledge of His work, we shall know Him.Christ's passion,His death,His resurrection and ascension,and all of those wonderful works which He did during His stay upon earth, in order to confirm mankind in the belief of His being God as well as man."
LambLion777 1 year ago
Impeccable sources. Thank you for doing this :-)
SourcesAreEverything 1 year ago
There is No way this could happen by chance.
Life creates life and non-life creates non-life.
"We" come from some place else...
Find where Our Spirit Energy comes from and you'll understand the rest...
How the physical and observable universe works cdk007 has hit the nail on the head.
Escekar 1 year ago
@Escekar "Life creates life and non-life creates non-life." Oh really? How do you work that out then?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@ClosedAperture
Simple, Get two crayons and mix then in a test tube? End result is a test tube filled with crayon. now mix a sperm and and egg from two humans it creates What?
humans alive, create life. Crayons not alive, creates no life.
Thats what i meant.
Escekar 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Escekar "Our Spirit Energy" What does that even mean?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@Escekar non-life creates non-life? Plz tell me when did cars start shagging each other and have car babies too?
shoulderkolibri 1 year ago
@shoulderkolibri Thats not what he meant. He is trying to highlight his point that only life can create life. Non-life cant create anything.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@syazwankhan You keep making this assertion about 'life only coming from life', but do you have any actual evidence that this is the case? You know anything that can actually back up the claim your making?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@syazwankhan Your so called 'claim' is so fractally flawed anyway that it is almost hilarious. Life can only come from life, so therefore God must be alive, which then begs the question of what made him if he is alive? Or maybe God isn't 'alive' he is out of time and space and you say, which then breaks your claim. Like you say life can only come from life, so if God isn't 'alive' how did he make life? However it doesn't matter because God is outside of logic isn't he? Give me a break...
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@ClosedAperture "which then begs the question of what made him if he is alive?" If God is made or created, He wouldnt be God. The question itself is fallacy, it doesnt make sense.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@syazwankhan Your logic is the thing that doesn't make any sense. 'Life has to come from life.' You are just claiming this as a fact, yet you still haven't given me any evidence to say this is true. When I then use your logic and apply it to God by saying that if God is alive and intelligent then what made him, you simply say well God is God so he doesn't abide by the same logic...
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@syazwankhan It is called special pleading, you are using your 'logic' as some kind of proof of God, yet the 'logic' your using doesn't apply to the very thing your trying to prove. I don't think you could provide a better example of fallacy if you wanted to... Yet again, you have zero evidence to support the existence of God...
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@syazwankhan Are you going to answer the question or not? According to Islam, who was the first Muslim?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@syazwankhan Do you not want to answer the question about who was the first Muslim? Maybe you don't know who it was...
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@ClosedAperture Muhammad (Pbuh) was the first Muslim among his own people, Jesus (pbuh) was the first Muslim among his people, Abraham(Pbuh) was the first Muslim among his people, same goes to Moses and the other prophets mentioned in the Quran. The Quran is simply saying that a particular prophet was the first to submit to God among his people. Sorry for the late reply. Muslims around the world are going through the fasting month now so i dont really spend much time on the computer.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@syazwankhan So who actually was the first muslim then, according to the quran?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@syazwankhan Are you just ignoring my comments now?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shoulderkolibri @shoulderkolibri Thats not what he meant. He is trying to highlight his point that only life can create life. Non-life can create nothing.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
The video is great but unfortunately discussion underneath is turning religious very badly. Please guys if you have any problems with his findings then bring some intelligent work up on youtube :)
Shazigul 1 year ago
Man please, God Made it lol.
whiteoutguy1 1 year ago
Its interesting. However, theory is just a theory if its not proven.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@syazwankhan Nope, you don't understand what scientific theory means. It is not the same as the colloquial definition of theory that is more generally used. Wikipedia can be your friend again, look it up.
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@ClosedAperture Physical theory such as gravity is accepted because its something that can be proven by observing and doing experiments. But this "Origin of Brain" theory is not proven. Theres no hard evidence.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@syazwankhan Again you don't understand what a theory is, CDK007 video isn't a theory it is a hypothesis based on several theories. Again you might want to look up what a hypothesis is. There is evidence, did you not watch the actual video? Which piece of evidence did you not find satisfactory?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@ClosedAperture Okay I got it. But the problem is, theres NO HARD EVIDENCE.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@syazwankhan What do you mean 'hard evidence' what exactly are you looking for?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@ClosedAperture Tangible evidence to prove this hypothesis.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@ClosedAperture Nvm. I know theres no evidence. Thats why its called a HYPOTHESIS.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@syazwankhan There is evidence... The whole video is full of evidence? A hypothesis is based off evidence? I think your very confused... You can sit there and say there is no evidence, but there actually is...
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@ClosedAperture Hypothesis has not been tested and proven but a scientific theory has been tested and proven.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@syazwankhan Yep your right... and your point is?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@syazwankhan Yes your right, however that doesn't mean there is no evidence to support this hypothesis, it wouldn't be a hypothesis if there wasn't evidence. Anyway what is your point if this hypothesis hasn't be proven, heck it could even be all wrong, so what?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
@ClosedAperture I asked u how the brain have the ability to think and cause emotions. And u told me to view this video. The problem is this hypothesis has not been tested and proven. So it is not useful.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@syazwankhan We have some understanding of how the brain has the ability or think and makes us feel emotions. This video sums up what we know, and why we think it works the way it does pretty well, but your right we don't 100% know how the brain evolved or how it works. Again, so what if we don't know?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
Comment removed
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@syazwankhan What? So you just suddenly jump from we don't know how the brain works to therefore there must be a God? You moron, how do you just come to that conclusion? And even if we do follow your absurd logic about intelligence having to create intelligence, what made your God then?
ClosedAperture 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ClosedAperture Now you're insulting me and calling me a moron. That really reflects your character. I didnt say "we don't know how the brain works to therefore there must be a God". What im trying to say is that the intelligence of the brain reflects on the intelligence on that entity that cause it. Again, only intelligence can cause another intelligence. LOGIC.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@ClosedAperture This proves the existence of a superb intelligent being called God. Just look and study how intelligent the brain is. Its logic and common sense. Non-intelligence cant cause intelligence. Only intelligence can cause intelligence.
syazwankhan 1 year ago
@syazwankhan Its not logic or common sense, you just can't think of any other way it could have happened so therefore it must be God. Its an argument from ignorance.
ClosedAperture 1 year ago