Both great player but Steve 2time MVP Chris Paul better defender and better handle. Steve Nash a better passer and shooter i think he's 8th all time 3 pointer made.....
fucking scrub lol.... nash is more talented in soccer but not basketball lol. You're either too biased, too dumb to look at stats and player ability, or too much of a nash cock sucker to realize this, but you do have your little shitty opinion
Steve nash best years: 18.8 points, 10.5 assists, `18.6 and 11.6, it took him 10 years with a better team to reach those stats. Chris paul best years: 22.8 points 11 assists and 22.1 and 11.6 assists (better than any steve nash year with a worse team) It took him 3 years to reach those stats. Not to mention he is quicker, faster, more athletic and a better ball handler (nash gets more turnovers). So you could say nash is more talented, you're just a fucking idiot. You stupid piece of shit.
Chris Paul relies on his speed and quickness when he's 36 he wont have near as much arsenal as Steve Nash -example Steve Nash has the best footwork in the league good enough to play for the Canada soccer (football) team - there fore Steve Nash is more complete
I don't think only stats can tell how great a player is. Of course it is a major factor, but not everything. Steve nash has no rings and when he was on the suns he had a great team. He didn't lead his team to the championship. Chris paul might not pass him but he could get close and might get a ring we will see. But numbers don't mean as much if your not a leader, championship calibur player. He doesn' dominate games or players like i've seen the greats do AS much. IMO overrated
@bucks100plus Um, First of all Steve Was mvp 2 times in a row that means he has to be dominate Second i'm saying i dont see chris getting to steve nash's level when he's 30 years old his game is so fast and quick that when he isn't fast he cant just still dominate idk we'll see what happens. maybe he should go to the lakers get kobe some more rings.
First of all, most of the greats have also been great defenders. Steve nash is geat offensively, yes he is the 2 time mvp with no rings. He is a great player just overrated. I don't feel his court presence as much as other players who have been great. Steve nash is a great facilitator, but he is incomplete his D and he's weak. I feel as if he isn't as dominant as many of the greats. Maybe because he is pass first, makes players around him better, great passer, but still overrated.
@bucks100plus How the fuck can you be over rated he got those MVP when the last two games the dude dised 20 assists and 30 points averaged like what 20 points 11 assists about that's fucking beast mode dipshit chris is lucky to be in the same conversation with nash
i said he was great. Get your dick out his mouth. He had a great team around him, one of the reasons why he had so many assists. i know he's a good passer. But he had a great team the years he won mvp. It wasn't just himself. Chris paul never had a team that good. And nash still didn't win the chip. I said he was good. Stop sucking his dick. I even said great but overrated damn lol. he's good at shooting three's and freethrows too. I just feel he's not one of the best ever.
@bucks100plus wtf who said he was the best ever? Please quote me when i said that?.. no i said Chris isn't as talented as Steve so what the fuck are you arguing about you fucking scrub
i said your going to say he is ONE of the best, and that I feel that he's not ONE of the best ever. I never said that you said he was the best ever i was saying what i felt. Some people, not you overrate him and say he is the best ever, NOT you. Read what i'm saying you asshole. And that's your opinion. We'll see if chris paul is able to lead a champion calibur team to a championship (if he ever gets one) something nash never did.
career stats you dipshit: Steve nash 14.6 points and 8.5 assists, shoots 90 percent free throws and 43 percent 3 point shot, field goals 51 percent. His defense sucks, he's not clutch, he's not that fast, he's weak, not so good at driving, and his first four seasons were shit. He averaged 7 points and 5 assists in his first four seasons. he had a fucking championship team the years he averaged his 18.6 points and 11.6 assists (mvp) less than what Paul averaged for his best years.
Steve nash 04-05 season had: barbosa, joe johnson, amare, quentin richardson, and fucking shawn marion..... 05 06 season - barbosa, raja bell, diow, shawn marion and amare.... 07-08 amare, shaq, raja bell, grant hill, and raja bell. ..............Chris pauls team in 04-05 only had jr smith and david west. Chris paul 05-06 same thing. 07-08 he had peja, chandler and west. (Just compare those teams)
chris paul career stats: 18.7 ppgs, 10 assists per game. 47 percent field goals, 36 percent three point and 85 percent free throws (nash has him beat, but these are great solid numbers. Nash is only a better shooter, and not by far, plus he averages less assists then Paul.) Chris paul his first four years averaged 19 points and about 10 assists. Nash 7 points 5 assist. Look at Nash's fucking team the year he got his best stats, way better than pauls team, and he never got a chip.
The conclusion we come to, Chris paul has way more steals in his career, is way more clutch, a better defender, averages more points and assists so far, a better finisher, stronger, drives to the hoop better, equally great passer (maybe not as flashy), but isn't a better shooter. I do admit, steve nash is a great shooter and Paul is just a good shooter. But Paul did this all with a team that was worse than Nash's. Give Chris paul Nash's team I guarentee he'd have two rings by now.
Steve nash does make players around him better. Look who the fuck was around him. He makes already all-stars better lol. And he makes already good players better. Chris paul turned David west into an all-star. David west o3-05 without chris paul - 5 points per game 4.5 rebounds per game. 06-09 with chris paul - 18.5 points and 8 rebounds per game. Did you see a difference?
A clear sign I was correct and Chris Paul is a more talented and better basketball player than Steve Nash. You brought up another plyayer because you lost the argument. I'm done for the day.
I'm not on his dick. I showed you numbers that invalidated your opinion or made you look stupid. I proved you wrong, you can't say shit faggot. You were sucking nash's dick, overhyping. I simply stated that Chris paul was better and showed you the stats. I barely play basketball but I watch it a LOT, so why would i want to be as good as Chris Paul? If anything you're the scrub. I'd appreciate if you don't speak to me anymore, you'll be making yourself look dumber you fucking bitch.
@bucks100plus You didn't show any stats you fucking scrub all you said was steve nash dosen't have a ring that's your only fucking comeback. and you said he was surrounded by good players when this year he only had grant hill and led the FUCKING LEAGUE IN ASSIST again haha chris paul didn't even do that so shut the fuck up fagget. STEVE NASH>CHRISPAUL
I didn't show stats? did you read the comments? Saying that alone makes you stupid asshole. Look at my comments and look at the numbers that don't lie, if you can read and accept you are wrong bitch. This is one year, not their whole careers. So far, Chris paul is better dipshit. Look at the stats. READ MY COMMENTS AND THEN TELL ME AGAIN I DIDNT SHOW ANY STATS you fucking dumbass.
Nash is by far a better shooter and passer but Chris is better defensively and is a lot younger so with time he can improve to be as good as Nash. Nash didn't really start playing at his best till he was over thirty so don't think Chris can't get there. Just my take on it.
@Myles7yo fail magic johnson was the best point and i hate how ppl think cp3 is the best hes not hes been in the nba 5 years no titles definetly the point ever nash is easily in the top 5 along with kidd
Steve Nash is now one of the best point guards in the NBA cause he is the 2 time MVP and he averages 12 assist per game. And if you said he suck your just fooling yourselves. Go Steve Nash!
dude, nash is better, paul has more stats coz he averages about 40 mins a game dude, look at nash only 30, nash averages 18.6 ppg and 11.3 apg and paul 20.2 ppg and 10.7 apg, but if you rate them in the same minutes, per 36 min, nash 20 and 12 paul 19.6 and 10.4, you see what i mean? and nash shoots the ball above 50% which is very good for guards and shoots above 45% on treys, 90% on FT which is phenomenal efficiency rate for PGs, Nash has even more career 3 pointers than Ray,
and wtf is number 2? have you been watching the NBA lately? Nash had a dip last year because they had shaq which a post player who need a lot of touches, make shaq play with paul and youll see how his stats will decline
ur a fuckin retard u dont kno anything about basketball if ur sayind cp3 is better than nash.... no point guard right now is better than nash...... get ur fuckin facts straight
first of all u fucking dick sucker, i never said that Chris Paul was better then Steve Nash u fucking idiot, if u read the NBA magazine of 09 ... u will see that it said that Chris Paul is the number 1 point for that fucking year... get that through your child molesting mind and shove that up your ass
Paul tiene mucho talento y ganas de mostrarlo, es joven y tendrá muchas oportunidades de lucirse en su posición en cualquier equipo, pero justo ahora Nash está sentando una cátedra porque juega como el mejor base sin que la edad le pese, y haciendo que sus compañeros jueguen en niveles que difícilmente tendrían en otras franquicias. Nash rompe con los mitos de la edad, del juego individual sobre el juego del equipo y sobre la calidad por encima de los logros mediaticos y estadísticos.
Nash is better now and ever, I think after paul quit and we look them careers Nash will be MUCH better, think in that old in this season 20 assist... Nearly him career high... Ppg 15+ Apg 10+ Possible MVP...
Chris Paul is the man right now, but Steve Nash was better when he was with the Mavericks. He and Dirk connect more then him and Shaq, but now Shaq is with the Cavs, so i don't know what future lies ahead of him.
chris paul is still a rookie i guess. he has some playoff expereince but nash knows everything he played 103 playoff games. nash has experience but chris paul still needs to learn a bit. i think paul could be better then nash in the future but till now.. nash anyday.
You can argue that Paul has better stats. I am not talking about stats. When I mean Nash can pass better I do not mean he has more assists but he does have more skill there. When I say he can score better I mean that if he shoots he has a better chance of it going in. Consistency just means that he does it on a reguar basis. So like it or not, don't deny it...
Now both players in their primes. I will consider Paul in his prime right now although if it comes close I will give it to Paul because he might become better. Here it goes: Scoring - Nash Defence - Paul Clutch - Nash Passing - Nash Rebounding - still both suck Three point shooting - Nash Free Throw - Nash Speed - Nash Attitude - Nash Stamina - Nash Driving the Lane - Nash Consistency - Nash Prone to Injury - Nash Better MVP cahnce - Nash. Will explain why later.
Lets break this down into categories. Currently in the league: Scoring - Nash Defence - Paul Clutch - Nash Passing - Nash(Chris Paul is very close) Rebounding - both suck Three point shooting - Nash Free Throw - Nash Speed - Too close but I give it to Paul Attitude - Nash Stamina - Nash Driving the Lane - Again very close but I will give it to Paul again. Consistency - Very close but Nash got it. Prone to Injury - Nash Has a better chance for MVP - Paul Will make another one...
Chris Paul has great speed and finess and will probably pass Nash in PG talent. But i would still pick Nash because Paul is horrible in crunch time. When he has to be clutch he isn't. Nash is the opposite.
One more thing... although Paul is the better basketball player...Nash is a more impressive athlete. He can play hockey and soccer as well. I don't think CP3 would be graceful on ice-skates.
well thats defiantly wrong. Chris Paul avg more points and leads the league in assists & steals. not to mention in the 2007-2008 season, Paul had a better statistical season then Steve Nash has ever had. Pretty impressive for a third year player. That being said, Nash by no means sucks. He is either 2 or 3 PG (behind possibly Deron Williams)
steve nah is a great player but he's starting to get pritty old, and he's had a good carrear aswell with 2 mvp but paul is just a freak in his second season he was runner up for mvp losing to kobe but not by much but paul is an awesome player and he's just gonna continue to get better and he's going to have a great carrear
chris paul is younger and better, steve nash has a great skill set, but his leadership skills are overated he could never raly a great team in dallas or pheonix to an nba title. i can see paul leading the hornets to a ring before his time is up.
i think that stevenash will win a championship before he retires and will be known as one of the best point gaurds ever....... and the same with chris paul... but i think chris paul will win like 2 or 3 mvps in his career with about 4 rings
thumbs up if you say steve nash is better
TheMrsexy14 1 week ago
song name?????
kratos13ist 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
full HD ......a??
kratos13ist 3 months ago
full HD ....e??
kratos13ist 3 months ago
JASON KIDD!!
nigel36r 5 months ago
STEVE NASH IS THE BEST!!!!!!!!!!
PhoenixSunsForLife 7 months ago 4
Both great player but Steve 2time MVP Chris Paul better defender and better handle. Steve Nash a better passer and shooter i think he's 8th all time 3 pointer made.....
icarl25fly 7 months ago
Paul is just more athletic in these videos so he wins in the scoring battle, but Nash wins the whole war
Hinasil 9 months ago
fucking scrub lol.... nash is more talented in soccer but not basketball lol. You're either too biased, too dumb to look at stats and player ability, or too much of a nash cock sucker to realize this, but you do have your little shitty opinion
bucks100plus 9 months ago
Steve nash best years: 18.8 points, 10.5 assists, `18.6 and 11.6, it took him 10 years with a better team to reach those stats. Chris paul best years: 22.8 points 11 assists and 22.1 and 11.6 assists (better than any steve nash year with a worse team) It took him 3 years to reach those stats. Not to mention he is quicker, faster, more athletic and a better ball handler (nash gets more turnovers). So you could say nash is more talented, you're just a fucking idiot. You stupid piece of shit.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
Chris Paul relies on his speed and quickness when he's 36 he wont have near as much arsenal as Steve Nash -example Steve Nash has the best footwork in the league good enough to play for the Canada soccer (football) team - there fore Steve Nash is more complete
redbull723 10 months ago
@redbull723
great footwork but his defense sucks. Chirs paul can shoot, pass, dribble, quick, fast and hes more clutch. He's better
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@bucks100plus watch him finish with list 15000 points and 8000 assists never gonna come close to steve nash's stats
redbull723 9 months ago
@redbull723
I don't think only stats can tell how great a player is. Of course it is a major factor, but not everything. Steve nash has no rings and when he was on the suns he had a great team. He didn't lead his team to the championship. Chris paul might not pass him but he could get close and might get a ring we will see. But numbers don't mean as much if your not a leader, championship calibur player. He doesn' dominate games or players like i've seen the greats do AS much. IMO overrated
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@bucks100plus Um, First of all Steve Was mvp 2 times in a row that means he has to be dominate Second i'm saying i dont see chris getting to steve nash's level when he's 30 years old his game is so fast and quick that when he isn't fast he cant just still dominate idk we'll see what happens. maybe he should go to the lakers get kobe some more rings.
redbull723 9 months ago
@redbull723
First of all, most of the greats have also been great defenders. Steve nash is geat offensively, yes he is the 2 time mvp with no rings. He is a great player just overrated. I don't feel his court presence as much as other players who have been great. Steve nash is a great facilitator, but he is incomplete his D and he's weak. I feel as if he isn't as dominant as many of the greats. Maybe because he is pass first, makes players around him better, great passer, but still overrated.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@bucks100plus How the fuck can you be over rated he got those MVP when the last two games the dude dised 20 assists and 30 points averaged like what 20 points 11 assists about that's fucking beast mode dipshit chris is lucky to be in the same conversation with nash
redbull723 9 months ago
@redbull723
i said he was great. Get your dick out his mouth. He had a great team around him, one of the reasons why he had so many assists. i know he's a good passer. But he had a great team the years he won mvp. It wasn't just himself. Chris paul never had a team that good. And nash still didn't win the chip. I said he was good. Stop sucking his dick. I even said great but overrated damn lol. he's good at shooting three's and freethrows too. I just feel he's not one of the best ever.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@bucks100plus wtf who said he was the best ever? Please quote me when i said that?.. no i said Chris isn't as talented as Steve so what the fuck are you arguing about you fucking scrub
redbull723 9 months ago
@redbull723
i said your going to say he is ONE of the best, and that I feel that he's not ONE of the best ever. I never said that you said he was the best ever i was saying what i felt. Some people, not you overrate him and say he is the best ever, NOT you. Read what i'm saying you asshole. And that's your opinion. We'll see if chris paul is able to lead a champion calibur team to a championship (if he ever gets one) something nash never did.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@redbull723
career stats you dipshit: Steve nash 14.6 points and 8.5 assists, shoots 90 percent free throws and 43 percent 3 point shot, field goals 51 percent. His defense sucks, he's not clutch, he's not that fast, he's weak, not so good at driving, and his first four seasons were shit. He averaged 7 points and 5 assists in his first four seasons. he had a fucking championship team the years he averaged his 18.6 points and 11.6 assists (mvp) less than what Paul averaged for his best years.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@redbull723
Steve nash 04-05 season had: barbosa, joe johnson, amare, quentin richardson, and fucking shawn marion..... 05 06 season - barbosa, raja bell, diow, shawn marion and amare.... 07-08 amare, shaq, raja bell, grant hill, and raja bell. ..............Chris pauls team in 04-05 only had jr smith and david west. Chris paul 05-06 same thing. 07-08 he had peja, chandler and west. (Just compare those teams)
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@redbull723
chris paul career stats: 18.7 ppgs, 10 assists per game. 47 percent field goals, 36 percent three point and 85 percent free throws (nash has him beat, but these are great solid numbers. Nash is only a better shooter, and not by far, plus he averages less assists then Paul.) Chris paul his first four years averaged 19 points and about 10 assists. Nash 7 points 5 assist. Look at Nash's fucking team the year he got his best stats, way better than pauls team, and he never got a chip.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@redbull723
The conclusion we come to, Chris paul has way more steals in his career, is way more clutch, a better defender, averages more points and assists so far, a better finisher, stronger, drives to the hoop better, equally great passer (maybe not as flashy), but isn't a better shooter. I do admit, steve nash is a great shooter and Paul is just a good shooter. But Paul did this all with a team that was worse than Nash's. Give Chris paul Nash's team I guarentee he'd have two rings by now.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@redbull723
Steve nash does make players around him better. Look who the fuck was around him. He makes already all-stars better lol. And he makes already good players better. Chris paul turned David west into an all-star. David west o3-05 without chris paul - 5 points per game 4.5 rebounds per game. 06-09 with chris paul - 18.5 points and 8 rebounds per game. Did you see a difference?
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@bucks100plus Derrick Rose is the better then both of them though.
redbull723 9 months ago
@redbull723
A clear sign I was correct and Chris Paul is a more talented and better basketball player than Steve Nash. You brought up another plyayer because you lost the argument. I'm done for the day.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@redbull723 rose is not a real PG his a scorer!!!! but nash and paul are real PG that play for their team not for themselves
imbo0798 8 months ago
@redbull723
okay he is one of the best you're going to say that because of his stats. But he is still overrated.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@bucks100plus "Stat's dont lie" Haha steve when he was 35 would fuck a primed Chris Paul all day long.
redbull723 9 months ago
@redbull723
yes he has heart, but he is very weak compared to guards like chris paul, deron williams, chauncey billups etc.....
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@redbull723
not to mention he isn't really athletic, but that's not that important at his position.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@bucks100plus Yeah he does what he can though. they both are great.
redbull723 9 months ago
@bucks100plus dude your fucking a scrub im tired of arguing you will never be good as chris paul so get off his dick u fagget
redbull723 9 months ago
@redbull723
I'm not on his dick. I showed you numbers that invalidated your opinion or made you look stupid. I proved you wrong, you can't say shit faggot. You were sucking nash's dick, overhyping. I simply stated that Chris paul was better and showed you the stats. I barely play basketball but I watch it a LOT, so why would i want to be as good as Chris Paul? If anything you're the scrub. I'd appreciate if you don't speak to me anymore, you'll be making yourself look dumber you fucking bitch.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
@redbull723 UR IN SANE
Steve nash> CP3 any day.
idontnoapassword 8 months ago
@idontnoapassword i know this dude was all on chris pauls dick. steve nash is still better
redbull723 8 months ago
@bucks100plus You didn't show any stats you fucking scrub all you said was steve nash dosen't have a ring that's your only fucking comeback. and you said he was surrounded by good players when this year he only had grant hill and led the FUCKING LEAGUE IN ASSIST again haha chris paul didn't even do that so shut the fuck up fagget. STEVE NASH>CHRISPAUL
redbull723 9 months ago
@redbull723
I didn't show stats? did you read the comments? Saying that alone makes you stupid asshole. Look at my comments and look at the numbers that don't lie, if you can read and accept you are wrong bitch. This is one year, not their whole careers. So far, Chris paul is better dipshit. Look at the stats. READ MY COMMENTS AND THEN TELL ME AGAIN I DIDNT SHOW ANY STATS you fucking dumbass.
bucks100plus 9 months ago
Comment removed
bucks100plus 9 months ago
lets clear this. when nash was cp3's age, he was nothing. - OVER -
ultimatebass90 1 year ago
@ultimatebass90 when paul reaches nash's age he wont even be in the nba! OVER
thepersianlion 11 months ago
i gotta give props to chris paul but when hes steve nash's age, he wont be playing anywhere near steve's level
mrliteboy13 1 year ago
nash is still dominant at 36 and is one of the better point guards in the league..no doubt steve nash.
mrliteboy13 1 year ago
I make NBA Mixes with o much passion bu noone watches them =( could anyone here give me a comment at least?
KingKoltAir 1 year ago
watch?v=BKgOmQvYYzs
haahaha
cacaio13isk 1 year ago
nash can shoot and get assist cp3 he can crossover and assist
MrNorrisboy1 1 year ago
@MrNorrisboy1 Nash can also do some pretty crazy circus moves. Steve nash can also do crossovers, he just prefers to pass.
mosnaidei 1 year ago
once Rondo gets a jump shot he will be the best point guard and Rondo has already a ring.
pajak626 1 year ago
@pajak626 Rondo has a jump shot
boston934 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pajak626
Rondo has a jump shot
boston934 1 year ago
@pajak626 rondo has garnett, allen, and pierce of course ur gonna win a championship with all of em
gunsnroses1ful 1 year ago
CP3 BOOOOIIIIII!!!!!!
VikingMinnesota 1 year ago
CP3 is 3X Better that Old Nash!!! :D
macremo 1 year ago
CP3 The Better PG On all NBA mah Niggas!! =D
macremo 1 year ago
Nash is by far a better shooter and passer but Chris is better defensively and is a lot younger so with time he can improve to be as good as Nash. Nash didn't really start playing at his best till he was over thirty so don't think Chris can't get there. Just my take on it.
eastsidewillyb 1 year ago
Just look at it this way... who's tied against the Lakers in the Western Conference Finals????
NASH
Orlando3Heat 1 year ago
steve nash sucks, chris paul is the best point guard
Myles7yo 1 year ago
@Myles7yo oh yeah cuz chris paul and the hornets make it to the playoffs every year
MrHeywatup 1 year ago
@Myles7yo fail magic johnson was the best point and i hate how ppl think cp3 is the best hes not hes been in the nba 5 years no titles definetly the point ever nash is easily in the top 5 along with kidd
MrHeywatup 1 year ago
NASH WINS!
Astrawaganza 2 years ago 7
Steve Nash is now one of the best point guards in the NBA cause he is the 2 time MVP and he averages 12 assist per game. And if you said he suck your just fooling yourselves. Go Steve Nash!
briansycomedy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
chris paul is the number 1 gaurd... and steve nash is number3
reklusnyc 2 years ago
dude, nash is better, paul has more stats coz he averages about 40 mins a game dude, look at nash only 30, nash averages 18.6 ppg and 11.3 apg and paul 20.2 ppg and 10.7 apg, but if you rate them in the same minutes, per 36 min, nash 20 and 12 paul 19.6 and 10.4, you see what i mean? and nash shoots the ball above 50% which is very good for guards and shoots above 45% on treys, 90% on FT which is phenomenal efficiency rate for PGs, Nash has even more career 3 pointers than Ray,
playmakerzam 2 years ago 3
yo right right right... we think the same.. i'll sub to you for that
ablack57 2 years ago
and wtf is number 2? have you been watching the NBA lately? Nash had a dip last year because they had shaq which a post player who need a lot of touches, make shaq play with paul and youll see how his stats will decline
playmakerzam 2 years ago
and nash is already 35-36 years old and still playing as an elite, hes already declared as the point guard of the decade
playmakerzam 2 years ago
nash was 1, paul was two, tp was 3
ablack57 2 years ago
ur a fuckin retard u dont kno anything about basketball if ur sayind cp3 is better than nash.... no point guard right now is better than nash...... get ur fuckin facts straight
Ramisiscool 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
reklusnyc 2 years ago
first of all u fucking dick sucker, i never said that Chris Paul was better then Steve Nash u fucking idiot, if u read the NBA magazine of 09 ... u will see that it said that Chris Paul is the number 1 point for that fucking year... get that through your child molesting mind and shove that up your ass
reklusnyc 2 years ago
cp3 will never be better than nash not even when cp3 is in his prime so how bout u go fuck ur dad and get ur bball facts straight u dumb nigga
Ramisiscool 2 years ago
Paul tiene mucho talento y ganas de mostrarlo, es joven y tendrá muchas oportunidades de lucirse en su posición en cualquier equipo, pero justo ahora Nash está sentando una cátedra porque juega como el mejor base sin que la edad le pese, y haciendo que sus compañeros jueguen en niveles que difícilmente tendrían en otras franquicias. Nash rompe con los mitos de la edad, del juego individual sobre el juego del equipo y sobre la calidad por encima de los logros mediaticos y estadísticos.
Gatotsu0 2 years ago
Nash is better now and ever, I think after paul quit and we look them careers Nash will be MUCH better, think in that old in this season 20 assist... Nearly him career high... Ppg 15+ Apg 10+ Possible MVP...
BecomeB 2 years ago
sinong pilipino dito??
mas magaling si steve nash !!!!!!!!!!
ablack57 2 years ago
Paul Just younger , at this moment nash is better , but next 2 years paul is going better than nash , that's because nash too old. OK.
krozover 2 years ago
hes already too old dude, Cp3 with that age should have overtaken nash already but nash is just too good
playmakerzam 2 years ago
who sings this?
nyfan226 2 years ago
steve nash is better than chris..
in 3pt ,field goal, assists,
but chrisis more defensive...
he is better in steals..
ablack57 2 years ago 2
Both are frikiiin´ espectacular so it´s fun to watch them both
1593irasema 2 years ago
STEVE NASH TO THE FULLEST
LOL09IZE 2 years ago 2
steve nash days are over,he is already old
chris paul is now the best
TheTakeshi922 2 years ago
what you saying dude?? hes alive right now and is 2nd under kobe in the MVP rankings
playmakerzam 2 years ago
yup he is now no.1 check it out man!!
go nash!!!
ablack57 2 years ago
Chris Paul is the man right now, but Steve Nash was better when he was with the Mavericks. He and Dirk connect more then him and Shaq, but now Shaq is with the Cavs, so i don't know what future lies ahead of him.
troanger5 2 years ago
nash and amare
dbv987 2 years ago 2
Chris PAULLL Right NOw
sobad1234 2 years ago
Chris paul is so much better right now.
Theballerflorida 2 years ago
chris paul wit a little bit more years behind him he can be da best.
2real4anyone 2 years ago 3
Steve nash is one of those passing point guards but chris paul is more into shooting. So i don't know
asdfxxxfdsa 2 years ago
steev nash is more better in shooting
look at his field goal and 3pt percentages..
chris paul is just taking too many shots so it looks like chris is better... watch some of steve's games
ablack57 2 years ago
both are the top point guards in the league but i think paul is better im not starting an argument its just my opinion
tra5555 2 years ago
steve nash rules !!!!!!!!!
yumastar 2 years ago 5
nash is the best and better than paul
dardangashi95 2 years ago 29
STEVE NASH ALL THE WAY
skate8103 2 years ago 34
@skate8103 shut up cp3 alll the way
campt1323 1 year ago
@skate8103 thats bullshit ALL THE WAY
sweettooth629 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chris Paul ALL-DAY
Cameron4cbtv 2 years ago
u have to much chris paul in this u need more nash i think steve nash is way better then chris paul but chris paul will be the best once nash leaves
kukymonster8o8 2 years ago 5
chris paul is still a rookie i guess. he has some playoff expereince but nash knows everything he played 103 playoff games. nash has experience but chris paul still needs to learn a bit. i think paul could be better then nash in the future but till now.. nash anyday.
leaderofsithclan 2 years ago 5
Steve Nash has a great periferal vision, he can pass with such a great acuraccy..he has a full court vision..
quiquitou 3 years ago
Nash, all the way...
quiquitou 3 years ago 4
You can argue that Paul has better stats. I am not talking about stats. When I mean Nash can pass better I do not mean he has more assists but he does have more skill there. When I say he can score better I mean that if he shoots he has a better chance of it going in. Consistency just means that he does it on a reguar basis. So like it or not, don't deny it...
MeatEatingVegeterian 3 years ago 4
MeatEatingVegeterian 3 years ago 8
MeatEatingVegeterian 3 years ago 5
NO CONTEST, NASH ANYDAY
daballer109 3 years ago 2
Chris Paul has great speed and finess and will probably pass Nash in PG talent. But i would still pick Nash because Paul is horrible in crunch time. When he has to be clutch he isn't. Nash is the opposite.
CaptainJack836 3 years ago 2
One more thing... although Paul is the better basketball player...Nash is a more impressive athlete. He can play hockey and soccer as well. I don't think CP3 would be graceful on ice-skates.
CaptainJack836 3 years ago
Comment removed
CaptainJack836 3 years ago
chris paul just look at the stats watch both of they games and compare
curtdaboss15 3 years ago
Chris Paul is anything but "shoot first".
He's "Win first" and that's why in 08 he had more win shares than Nash did in any of his MVPseasons.
GranteedEV 3 years ago
Chris Paul is a shoot first point guard thats why he has so much points not better than nash.
1R3d0wnz1 3 years ago 2
horrible quality
juniorballin4eva 3 years ago
steve nash is still better then cris paul hands down if anyone disagrees go fuk urself
sofa510 3 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
well thats defiantly wrong. Chris Paul avg more points and leads the league in assists & steals. not to mention in the 2007-2008 season, Paul had a better statistical season then Steve Nash has ever had. Pretty impressive for a third year player. That being said, Nash by no means sucks. He is either 2 or 3 PG (behind possibly Deron Williams)
brockoly08 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cp3 will always be better than steve nash and there is nuthin else u can say cp3 is faster, better scorer and better defense
chrispaulassist3 3 years ago
steve nah is a great player but he's starting to get pritty old, and he's had a good carrear aswell with 2 mvp but paul is just a freak in his second season he was runner up for mvp losing to kobe but not by much but paul is an awesome player and he's just gonna continue to get better and he's going to have a great carrear
adammg3 3 years ago 2
nash is the best guard!
thepersianlion 3 years ago 5
nope
chrispaulassist3 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
... u know the only reason why Nash won 2 MVPs because he's white right??
how the fuck u have the best center and power forward in the NBA back in 06 and 07 and still havent won a champian ship?
imeemin 3 years ago
u must be a black man
lampardchelse 3 years ago
steve nash all the way, at least to me anyways
hahahomi 3 years ago 4
white people.......
imeemin 3 years ago
steve nash is better he may be older and he is still better
Yaterde 3 years ago 6
no way man u suck in life thats frickin bullshit and u kno it bitch
chrispaulassist3 3 years ago
song is cant be touched.
zaboncek 3 years ago
what song is this i forgot
omajeakal 3 years ago
chris paul is younger and better, steve nash has a great skill set, but his leadership skills are overated he could never raly a great team in dallas or pheonix to an nba title. i can see paul leading the hornets to a ring before his time is up.
genesisandpower 3 years ago
ermm steve nash amare and the suns can win it this year with porter (pistons ass. coach) Hopefully he will bring some defensive skills to the suns.
1R3d0wnz1 3 years ago
steve nash wont win a championship unless he gets traded suns have no D
spursbeatlakers77 3 years ago
i think that stevenash will win a championship before he retires and will be known as one of the best point gaurds ever....... and the same with chris paul... but i think chris paul will win like 2 or 3 mvps in his career with about 4 rings
winchesterdog 3 years ago
chris paul all the way but steave nash is still good
bballhiz 3 years ago