Attila the Hun (Part 4)

[gerula08]

cursed !

[HAL9000Intelligence]

Great video.

[HAL9000Intelligence]

Checking and monitoring YouTube for any wanton, brazen and obvious blatant conspicuous acts of Censorship by YouTube, which has been posted and reported previously by other commentators on YouTube who have explained that it cannot be rationalized and it cannot be understood to be a mere technical accident especially if it is repeated again and again and yet again. You would think that Censorship would only occur only in Communist Red China or Iran or North Korea. Well surprise surprise!

[CowbellBlues]

To make everyone happy, they should just call Hungary:  Magyarhunavarostrogothslavante­s

[BlainePistolle]

@CowbellBlues who can argue with such logic

[xxsherkhanxx]

NemSoha is some fool Hindu convert Muhajir or Bihari who knows nothing about the Turkic origins of Pakistan.

[SuperiorHuns]

Elkepeszto hogy mennyi amerikai barom akarja nekunk magyaroknak elmagyarazni a sajat tortenelmunket !

Meg abban is vitaznak velem a magyarral, hogy hogyan kell helyesen leirni a fovarosunk nevet ! 15 - 23 - eves kis taknyosok, a sajat amerikai tortenelmuket sem tudjak, es meg okoskodik a kis szarhazi takonyfeju barom !

Hat kinek erzik ezek magukat?

Agymosott az osszes !

Ezt nem az amerikaban elo magyarokra ertem, hanem az ott szuletettekre, mert azok jattszak az okostojast !

[MOTUN]

Huns are accepted to have been a Turkisc speaking tribe. Magyars had nothing to do with the Huns. Hungary comes the word Onogur , a Turkic tribe. Onogur turned into Hungary in time. The founders of what is to day Hungary were Onogurs, who had kinship with the Huns. Magyars came to Hungary with Onogurs. There is no connection between Magyars and Huns.

[NemSoha]

No they aren't, because there is no evidence to support the claim, and it is clear that you haven't done any research on the subject of Hungarian origins at all. Onogur is not a tribe, it is many tribes, and most of the finds and graves in Hungary from the Conquest come from Onogurs, showing that the Magyars settled much earlier than previously thought. Read up on the dual-conquest, it's quite interesting, and is even mentioned in Russian historical records.

[atillahan16]

Hun is the old name of the Turkish people wich they live in centrale Asia and there are 4 diferent Hun empires: Great (Asia) Huns, White Hund, Europe Huns (Atilla) and Avar Huns. These 4 empires were following from 204 before Jesus - 796 After Jesus. And these 4 empires are only 4 from 16 turkish empires.

[nepomukpaper]

>>atillahan16

Yeah and Atiila, Genghis Kahn, Batu Kahn, and Timur are all asian mongoloid.

[NemSoha]

@atillahan16 You mean Turkic, not Turkish. Huns were older than the Turks. The name Turk did not come about in history until much later after the Hun empire.

[MaLiveMaRulesMaGun]

example for you. , for the europeans is Jesus. with blue eyes look like a european .

but truly he look like a ARAB he is a ARAB or JEW. not european.

[NemSoha]

Arabs and Jews are Semites, and are still Caucasian, as are Europeans. I am not getting your point. (Jesus was Jewish, as was Buddha Hindu)

Actually, this example best illustrates that Huns, Turks, Mongols, Manchus are all Asians, but different groups. They all share many physical traits, but still have different lineage.

[antowalk]

semits are a blend of east africans and the ancient eastern tribes that lived throughout present day iraq, arabia oman and yemen. Love central asian studies there an amazing people that are so miss understood.

[nepomukpaper]

>>antowalk

You dont get to the point. Again I say, Attila, Genghis Kahn, Batu Kahn, Timur are all Asian Mongoloid. Look at Attilas portrayal at elder edda, Attila is asian mongoloid, sure.

[antowalk]

i know timur and all of the individuals wer central asian that comment was in reply to what someone had said in regard to semites being caucasian whic is riduculous. Yes temur's tribe was originally from mongolia. The Barlus tribal confederation. I hate it when euriopeans try to europeanize the great Nomads its like there trying to strip the glory from my central asian friends.

[nepomukpaper]

>>antowalk

Oh, ok. Yes, thank you for your response and advice. God bless you.

[sieglgtube]

Huns, Turks, Sumerians, Magyars, Native Americans etc are not just Asians but specifically share a common Turanian cultural heritage. Lifestyle, language, grammar, religion, customs,culture, outlook on life have striking similarities between them.Jesus was most definitely not Jewish and how was Buddha a Hindu?

Caucasian is a XIXth century (very probably wrong) category. Culturally the Semites and the Indoeuropeans share quite a bit more than Turanians and either of the former.

[NemSoha]

@sieglgtube Read the Bible, Jesus was a Jew. Buddha was a Hindu because that's what the prevalent religion was in India before he created Buddhism.

[MaLiveMaRulesMaGun]

Nem Soha,

where the turks came from? if you go to china and tell a chinesse about the turks and the wall. the chinesse man are angry about your question. Uigur live in west china , they speak turkish. have a blue flag with the moon and star. like turkish flag.

dont tell bullshit.

[NemSoha]

Uighurs don't speak Turkish, they speak Uighur. It is similar, but still different. Pakistan's flag is moon and star too. Are they Turks? The Turks came from west of Xinjiang, in Central Asia.

[xxsherkhanxx]

Pakistanis are Turks. The Pakistani language, Urdu, comes from the Turkish/Mongol word Ordu, meaning camp. Turkish/Uighur/Pakistani, all Turks.

[NemSoha]

@xxsherkhanxx Pakistanis are not Turks. There may be influence from the Mughals, whose rulers were Turks, but Pakistanis are not Turks themselves. Ethnically they are not Turks. Linguistically, Urdu is not a Turkic language, even if the you made a connection between two words.

[MOTUN]

Dear Nem Soha. You dont believe what I am saying but what I tell are historical truths. do you know Gyula Nemeth, one of the most leading several authorities about the Huns? do u know other Hungarian scholars such as L.Ligeti, Lazslo Rasonyi, L. Kattona, B.Szasz, A.Alfoldi, E.Eckhardt ant etc? they are also saying what I told you about the Huns and Onogurs. On Ogurs were a proto-Turkic tribe. The fact that Huns were a proto-Turkic tribe are accepted by the majority of the scholarly milieu.

[thecam3l3on]

@MOTUN ok then, read about the studies of Juan Moricz (Móricz János). Where he was and where he learned some interesting things, and even if it sounds crazy, even 'the' Neil Armstrong was there to do some studies. Wery interesting things indeed.

[MOTUN]

@thecam3l3on who is Juan Moricz? who knows him? learn history first and then give answer to me . The majority of scholars accept that Huns were a Turkic speaking tribe.

[thecam3l3on]

@MOTUN sorry you missunderstood me, wasnt arguing if the huns were turkic or not. i was talking about something waaaaaaay more old than that. try searching on google: janos moricz. click on first result and read on from there. regards

[MOTUN]

The greatest book about European Huns are the world of the Huns by Otto Helfen Maenchen. You can see it if you can find and also you can read the articles by Omeljan Pritsak, one of several authorities of all times about the Huns. You can read Attila es Hunjai bu Gyula Nemeth.

[projections]

@xxsherkhanxx Pakistanis are Turks? hahahhahahahahahahhahahahahah You are an idiot. Their rulers were Turks but Pakistanis are exactly like Indians (Indo-Aryan and Dravidian)

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha which language do Uighurs speak? dont make nonsense. All of linquists accept that Uighur langauge is a Turkic dialect. Shut up if you dont know anything about any topic.

[NemSoha]

@MOTUN I said they speak Uighur, not Turkish. Uighur is similar, but not the same as Turkish.

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha look at what you wrote first and write me answer!

[NemSoha]

@MOTUN I saw what I wrote. Uighur and Turkish are not the same language. Pakistanis are not Turks. They were ruled by Turks. People in Hong Kong are not British. They were ruled by British.

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha To debate about one topic with someone ,who doesnt have any information about one linquistic truth accepted by all the world, such as you is a waste of time. Learn truth about Uighurs if you dont know . Uighurs are accepted by all scholars to be of Turkic origin racially not only linguistically.

[NemSoha]

@MOTUN Not all Turkic speakers are Turkic in origin. Kazakhs are another example. After Gokturk Empire, the Uighurs defeated them and took over, then the Kyrgyz after them. They were not Gokturks, but adopted their language. As for Pakistanis, Urdu is nothing more than Hindi with some Persian and maybe a few Turkic words.

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha you are one of the most stupid men on earth. You can be sure of that. I dont know why I am debating with someone who doesnt know anything about Turkish history still. I am really wondering about what kind of brain you have. Dont answer me again. you are a waste of time for me.

[NemSoha]

@MOTUN OK,write all the Turkish nationalist propaganda you want, you cannot rewrite your own history though, nor the history of others

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha I cant debate any topic with someone who doesnt know any historical information

[NemSoha]

@MOTUN Only Turkish nationalists go on every youtube video about Central Asia and wikipedia page and try to rewrite other peoples' histories.

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha J. de Guignes, F. Hirth, Marquart, Franke, Ramsted, Pritsak, Nemeth, .Mcgovern, Basin, Feher, Gumilev, Maenchen-Helfen, Grousset, Eberhard, Haussing, Ligeti, Klaproth, De Groot, P.B.golden, K.Shiratori, J.P.Roux, B.Munkasci, A.N.Panov, L.K.Katona, M.I.Artomonov, G.Grjumaylo, Vaczy, J.B.Bury, D.Nikolle, D.Cristian and others accept the Huns were of Turkic origin. Are they supporters of Turkic propaganda ? If you dont know truth about the Huns They are accepted to be of Turkish origin.

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha The majority of the scholars accept the fact that Huns were of Turkic origin. By the way, Hungary word doesnt come from Hun. It comes from On ogur, a Turkic tribe. The founders od today's Hungary were Turks. Arpad and his dynasty were of Turkic origin not of Hungarian origin. On ogur turned into Hungary in time. learn this truth if u dont know.

[NemSoha]

@MOTUN Actually very few do, and the theory is out dated already. Most scholars in the West today say there is just too little evidence to conclude it, whereas in China and Mongolia many scholars support traditional accounts of Hungarian history. I'm familiar with the Khazars who joined the Magyars, but archeological findings support that there were 2 waves of migrations, the second one supposedly occuring in 896 having very few people. Earlier settlements were much earlier and numerous

[NemSoha]

In fact, the 896 conquest is written by some others such as in the Chronicon Pictum as being 100-200 years earlier. Arpad's Magyars were too few to make an impact culturally or linguistically. The Magyars who arrived before him spoke the same language and had the same culture. Grave findings show the two populations buried each other side by side, using the same settlements. The Huns/Avars of earlier times are the same. "Magyars: Their Life and Civilization by Gyula Laszlo"

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha if you were familiar with Hun studies you would know the fact that Huns are accepted to be of Turkic origin very strongly. If you dont accept this truth about the Huns it is your problem not the problem of scholars. Scholars accept the fact that Huns spoke an archaic form of Turkic akin to Chuvasian, a Turkic dialect. Arpad dynasty has nothing to do with Magyars.You can trust on the credibility of your own baseless historical claims but dont expect scholarly milieu to believe them.

[NemSoha]

@MOTUN The fact you speak of the Hun language as belonging to a form of any language is laughable, since barely any remnants of the language even exist anymore aside from a few names and thus cannot be connected even in the slightest bit to any language past or present! As for baseless claims, I cited archeological evidence and where I got it, now go buy the book!

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha You cited archaelogical evidences about Magyars not the Huns. look, Huns are accepted the grandsons of Xiong-nus, Asian Huns. Chinese sources say that Xiong-nus spoke a Turkic dialect. Learn this if u dont know. Bulgars are descended from Huns and Attila dynasty. Bulgars were a Turkic tribe and they spoke a Chuvasian dialect. If you want more I can present more linquistic evidences. Huns have nothing to do with Magyars!

[NemSoha]

@MOTUN And I also said the Magyars conquest did not happen quite the way most history books say, considering grave findings from conquest era. As for Chinese sources, no Chinese history book says the Xiongnu spoke a Turkic dialect! I speak Chinese and bought a couple of these books like the book of Han and history written by Sima Qian. The reason Turk isn't even mentioned is they did not come to China until the Tang dynasty, hundreds of years after the Xiongnu left.

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha Tiele tribe (High Carts), mentioned by Chinese sources, was of Turkic tribe. All of scholars accept the fact that they are of Turkic origin. Chinese sources Xiong-nu language was the same as the language of Tiele ( For this information, u can look at the book named "The Huns" by Lev Nikolayevich, the greatest Russian authority about the Huns ) This shows the Xiong-nus spoke Turkic. in another message I will present the only Xiong-nu sentence survived until todayin another post.

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha Hiung-nu sentence: Siükeh theileikang bukuk gu thuktang = go out army and capture the commander. This Hunnish sentence has not been explained by any language but Turkish. Its Turkish explanation: Süke tilikang bukukgu tuktang = go out army and capture the commander. As you see, I present linquistic evidences. which linquistic evidences can you present to confirm your own thesis ?

[NemSoha]

@MOTUN Actually what you did was write a sentence and did not say what the source is you got it from.

[MOTUN]

@NemSohaK.Shiratori, "Über die Sprache der Hiungnu und der Tunghu-Stämme, Izvestija imperatorskoj akademii nauk, T.XVII, NO 2(190), 01-032.--B., Johannes , Das Hunnische, Donaubolgarische und Wolgabolgarische", Fundamenta I (1959),PP.685-695.--G.J.Ramste­dt, "Zur Frage nach der Stellung des Tschuwassichen",JSFOu, XXXVIII, 1(1992),P.31. --T. Tekin, Makaleler 1 Altayistik, The Hunnic Couplet in Chin-Shu, 2003, p.289-298. V, Étienne de la. 2005. Huns et Xiongnu. Central Asiatic Journal, 49(1): 3-26.

[MOTUN]

@NemSoha Shiratori found that Hunnish couplet in Chinese sources. As you see, I can present evidences. where are your evidences?

[NemSoha]

@MOTUN I see that on exactly one website and no where else. Unless it is a recent discovery, which the site does not claim, such a sentence does not exist in historical records. Would u care to elaborate on the academic/professional background of shiratori?

[NemSoha]

@NemSoha Actually there is only one site, which specifically says it is not from the Huns, but is thought to be from another nomadic group. There is no such remnant of the Hun language which remains today. There is supposedly a codex containing Hunnish words and grammar found in Isfahan, Iran, however it has yet to be verified, so is still at this point not mentionable as fact.

[Uuuurk]

wasent it the sword of the god mars?

[dvsxavier]

Classic case of cowboys (nomads) vs. farmers (settlers). Chinese farmers won. They drove the Huns to the West. Attila took german christian women as wives. Attila like Alexander the Great rewarded his troops while he took none for himself. Too bad he succumbed to death before his Huns and his Gothic (German) slave army rattled the Western Roman walls to the ground. Probably poisoned by his many enemies who were greedy and jealous of Attila's leadership of the Huns.

[TheTurks123]

turk is hun..... hun is turk. we are brothers like other 350 mllion turk all over the world!!

[neobarockloki86]

Well my friends, I don't care that much to have a debate upon this. I'm Szekely Hungarian and I'm proud to be this. I know what I know and how I know and that's enough for me. Don't you think that Hungarians are barbarians even nowdays. No. They are very respect knowing but also funny people, bit ironic people. And even if they were pagan barbarians, that's fine to me, at least they showed the world they aren't cowards and weak, hehe. For the Hungarian history I would say : Szép volt fiuk !!!:D

[pappflora12]

Kösz megtettük amit lehetett! :D

De komolyan.....én Szegedi Magyar vagyok!

Amúgy most 4.jére írom le,de Hungary név nem Attila a HUNtól jött,hanem Hunortól...mi magyarok magunkat Magorról neveztük el!

[pappflora12]

Amúgy a Székely Magyarokat is testvéreinknek tekintjük habár a r...t politikusok és a múlt kiszúrt veletek,én kérek ezért bocsánatot testvér!

De én személyesen és a polgárok nagy része még mindig magyarnak tekint,csak éppenséggel külföldi magyarnak!

[neobarockloki86]

A helyzet a következő : Nem kell elkeseredni. Mert Magyarország területileg összement...hát ez van. Ez ellen csak egy dolgot lehet tenni, megprobálni a lehető legjobban élni, egy korupció meg lopás mentes életet élni. Ezzel bizonyítani Europának. Egy kulturált, civilizált és inteligens életet vinni. Meg aztán minden folyamatos változásban van, igy azok az elvesztett területek sem lesznek a végtelenségig más ország területein belül. Igy vagy ugy, valahogy alakul...

[pappflora12]

Igazad van teljesen!

[thecam3l3on]

@neobarockloki86 beleszolok ha nem haragszol.szia. neked is azt ajanlom mint a masik commenternek, olvass utana (ha mar meg nem tetted) Moricz Janos munkassaganak. Es ha tenyleg igaza van es tenyleg ottvan az eredetunk, akkor ne csodalkozz hogy a magyar hatar "csak ugy osszement". bocs a zavarasert

[atillaphoto]

BLOODLINE do you have it???? are you commenters even hungarian?you guys sound like fools. think you know eveything,probably a bunch of JEWS...............

[Darkhammer85]

Atilla ( Ata= Father in turkish , and Atilla means Ancestoral in Turkish ) That alone enogh proof for me that Atilla was Descendant of central asian Great HUN Empire!

[sk9utube]

5:37 June of A.D. 450 Anoria was caught in a compromising position, Does anyone know what position that was? Missionary? Doggy style?

[englishfrenchgerman]

lol

[sk9utube]

5:06 Where did that lady loon to pwonounce her 'r 's"

[englishfrenchgerman]

She's got a lisp of some sort. She's not the only one in the world. So does actor, director and all-round funny guy Terry Jones

[thecam3l3on]

@HungariansAreHuns te is olvass utana, nem is oan biztos hogy azsiabaol jottunk, nem viccelek vagy szivatlak. Nezz utana Moricz Janos munkajanak.

[ohdaesu15]

hun = mongol = turk = kazak=central asia = north china = korea = japan ~~~~~ Ural-Altaic languages

hungary is not hun

hungary was steal name of hun

hungary=german+slavic+gypsy+la­tin mixed

attila and Genghis Khan is pride of Ural-Altaic

[alfaromeo1986]

The Hungarians, who call themselves Magyar, have an ancient traditional pre-christian account of their origins according to which they were the descendents of Nimrod (also spelled as Nimrud), son of Cush; Nimrod and Eneth had two sons, Magor and Hunor; Magor was the ancestor of the Magyars, and Hunor was the ancestor of the Huns, thus symbolizing the common origins of the Huns and of the Magyars.

[alfaromeo1986]

And the Magyars never steal the name,because the west european tribes gave that name for us. We always called themselves magyar and Hungary is Magyarország not Hungary! Just the English people said always "hungarian", because they cannot be said this word, magyar! And Attila never was mongol or turkish, because he was white caucasian. He was born near the Volga river. Nowadays the Volga river is in Russia.

[alfaromeo1986]

It's only negative propaganda, that he was mongolian. The Romans and the Slavs created this lie because they are afraid of the strength of the Hunnic empire. The nearly ancestors of the Huns live today in Szekelyland, which is a Hungarian ethnic area in Transylvania. They call themselves Szekelys(Székely) and they trying to fight for their autonomy.

[Darkhammer85]

Firstly look at great empires the Turkish created !

We are the only nation who defeated chinese and did great job which caused chinese built great wall!

secondly European hun empire is one of descendants of Great HUN Empire which is created in Central Asia . After great migration Turks spreadedd to world and some marched to europe .

thirdly in hungary there are still people looks like central asians .

[alfaromeo1986]

I hope so you don't believe these stupidities, what you wrote down here. :) Firstly the Hungarians are not equal with the Huns. Secondly the Hungarians are whites, Europeans. The Turkish are not europeans, they are Central Asians.Thirdly the Hungarians are christians, the Turkish people are muslims.

[Darkhammer85]

I agree they are not they never forged great empires like Turks!

[hongnongren]

Correction: The Huns (Xiongnu in Chinese=Hunor in Hungarian?) looted the villages in northwestern China during ~200 BC and the Great wall was built to stop them from taking the farmers and settlers as easy prey/victims. The barbaric Huns were in fact driven away by the Calvary of Han dynasty ~100 BC forcing them fleeing west for good.

If they have defeated Chinese as what you thought, modern China would be very different now!

[NemSoha]

You are right, but after the Huns split into two tribes, North and South, the Northern tribes migrated west and settled in Hungary while the Southern tribes settled in northern Shaanxi province in China. Therefore, no Turks or Mongols descended from either group. Huns are not Turks, Turks are not Huns. Period.

[bathoryeszter]

...and Attila's youngest son-Csaba as we call him (Irnak...?) is in our anthem...:)

[gamesbok]

@alfaromeo1986 What do the Chinese call Korea? Why was the Great Wall built?

[odinthegodofwar]

@alfaromeo1986 The Romans didn't even know the Mongols... Its historians who 'believe' they're 'Mongoloid Turks' and there is no real proof there from any of these places, they're just theories

[evildnalor]

@alfaromeo1986 @odinthegodofwar Yeah, alot of people confuse the Huns and the Mongol Horde. The huns were altaian. They were close to mongolia but more rooted in Siberia. I do not know much about the Szekelys. Did'nt the Szekelys have a primitive form of runic writing that was not phoenician based? If so they could not be Altai Huns, because the huns had no written language while I think the Szekelys had a very primitive one.

[thecam3l3on]

@evildnalor oh yes a very primitive one, which symbols you find in the sumerian writings (abc), and they were nobody, correct? they just were one of the most advanced civilisations of their era, so please, no offence buddy, call your own criss-cross primitive.

[evildnalor]

@thecam3l3on they were not nobody, they were a great people, so now you are talking about a szelky/sumerian connection? It's not impossible just improbable. Unless you can show me some evidence or point me to a link that shows proof of what your saying.

[vukkjagermeister]

Attila is HUN=HUNGARY!!!

[AnahiemerOC]

Attila is straight up asianatic hun blood ancestors to all related to the huns Attila learn the way of the romans mix with his custome heritage and the Romans,Gepids,visigoths,ostrog­oths,alanis,germanic kingdoms,sythians,franks,lomba­rds,vandles, and ect wipe the huns ass when Attila fought them. to be honest 4th a.d europeans never knew that much of far east culture and warfare and the romans made up stupid lies agianst the huns huns are a sophisticated people and well adopted type. :)

[14Deniz08Artvin88]

Atilla was great man!

[Energyium]

people are funny

lol

[papaszem44]

Prof.Michelle Salzman is not a professional at all, she is very unprofessional!!!

(I meent she is a stupid beach!)

[Killare2]

you mean bitch not beach?XD

[Zarandok501]

"Prof." Salzman and Bauml(strange names for americans)! Why don't you show us a single piece of original hun design cloth? Or a single piece of trinket found in a hun grave? Oh, wait, I know: because everybody would realise at once, that the whole world is wearing the clothes invented by the huns. And one single trinket with its beautiful shape and carvings would prove that they weren't primitive barbarian hordes. The question remains: why do you want us to think this?

[fatmaccam]

no offense, but why are "salzman" and "bäumle" strange names for americans?

[ababaibaba]

Now kids in the end

we all know that everybody is turk in this round world.

Are you satisfied?

[emdziyaduman]

Atilla was a Turkic Warrior, please dont tell me he was Hungarıan. Dont forger there was no such thing called Hungarians, they were Magyrs which are also from Turkic Desecnt :)

[IvanSorath]

what are you talking about he's not hungarian he's not turk noone knows he might be half chinesse half greek who knows by the way people in turkey need to take a 3 hour shower my god

[irishhunbrit]

attilla=hungarian

[Quentin0000000000]

your 3 half lol i h8 brits

[vaskoninja]

o rly ?

bulgar not tatar stupid turks

[Buminkhan64]

TENGRi`s (GOD) SWORD, KHAN ATTiLA.

HE CAMES FROM TÜRKESTAN (Central Asia) AND HE WAS THE KHAN FROME THE EUROPEAN HUN/KUN`S (TÜRK`S)

[terminator00000]

genghis khan wasn't a turk he was mongolian

[ayhanakelli48]

Many mongolians became Turk ( Like tartarians in Tartaria ). We have similar language.

[Tchyngyz]

Turkic people influence alot in history, even Korean, Hungary, Estonia, Finland and Japanese present are close to Turkic languages. We have invaded asia every where,

The greatest Turkic Kings (by time)

-Attila the Khan

-Genghis Khan

-Ögedei Khan

-Hilegu Khan

-Kublai Khan

-Timur Khan

-Babur Khan

[Tchyngyz]

each of this khan's effected present asia and even europe and the north america in some way. That we are here today. And the sad part they are all compared to Adolf Hitler, the racist and exterminator but all these Turkic leaders never did wish to exterminate but destroy anybody who oppose. There is a difference there.

Long Live the Turkic People and its Allies!

[ugunun]

however when the huns were at the gates of rome it was a mix of everything

[ugunun]

the huns were a confederation of a turkic tribe the xiongnu and a finnic and ugric tribe according to physical anthropologists who have studied hun skulls.. the xiongnu was predominately mongoloid with caucasian admixture the finnic skulls were very similar to the modern Inhabitants of Finland Estonians and mari people the ugric skulls were similar to mansi people but with less caucasoid admixture.

[martincors]

The bulgarians are not turks!!!

[attila6565]

Attila is a Turkish hero. It is a very popular name in Turkey. As you see my name is Attila too. Only an ignorant idiot can say that he is Christian and not Turkish. Please do not distort historical facts.

With my best regards.

[ayhanakelli48]

Attila was Turk and Shaman. ( There was no christianity in EUrope in 400 AD- Christianity was a forbiddien dangerous monotheist religion in Roman Empire till 325AD- It was not dangerous after 325 cos ıt recognised SEZAR-This is the fact)He was not christian. When the Huns converted christianty they forgot that they were Turks.

[pagola]

i dont think he was that raw he caught the roma empire weak and divided and unguarded yo

for real

[szajbercavboj]

My name is Attila and I am Hungarian.

[ayhanakelli48]

But you forgot you are Turkic nation which has roots in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan.. You are Turkic nation.

[spa05akw]

It is only a name. I am Alexander, greek name, but I am not greek. You can change your name to whatever you like.

[atlanticl]

lol...thus dude certainly spanked the sissy romans hard...lol...

[normalukrainian]

He came out of Stepps by Black Sea. Current Ukraine. Later he expanded his empire to the West-through Balacns-to the Rome!

[belagiorgo]

idiots HUN its russian and mongol guy mix and they go to hungary only turkish is otto man commander!read history man

[urungu34]

Atilla is Turkish name still too many ppl use this name in Turkey today..

[terminator00000]

he wasn't turkish, he didn't belong to any religion but if he were to he probably would belong to eastern orthodox

[urungu34]

all turkic-turanic peoples were Shaman then they converted religion as christian or muslim...Bulgar,Avar,Hungar,Kh­azars come from central asia via north of Khazar sea,their childrens are christians today and other turkic people Oguz Turks came to west via south Khazar sea and their childrens muslim today..

[SultanBorat]

Was Atilla a Christian?

[XIPM3]

i highly doubt it.

[markderv]

he was not a christian,thats the whole point.

[thecam3l3on]

@SultanBorat nope he was not, later a king named Istvan (Vajk) introduced christianity to the magyar people.

[turkishwolwes]

He is Turks Father!!!!

[spa05akw]

Proto-Bulgarians are the turks fathers. They were Huns and 1:st turks to enter Europe.

[turkishwolwes]

No.U wrong.Coz Turk's father Proto Turks.And their known first Emperor is Teoman (Tu-man) and his son Mete Han (Mao-Tun).