Added: 9 months ago
From: noverichip
Views: 17,313
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Yes like C02 is a problem when all plants and trees need it to survive.

    Another great video noverichip :-)

  • Looks like more New World Order propaganda

  • right on!!!, after i watched the movie 'Zeitgeist moving forward' here on youtube, I got the best answer and you told about it to all my friends.

  • One volcanic eruption will relese more CO2 than humans created in the lifetime of fossil fuels. H2O is an even more potent greenhouse gas climate change propagandist just know ppl arn't stupid enough (yet) to tax boiling water. Life is a dynamic system we should lower carbon emissions by planting more forests and trees, and investing in renwable resources, not taxing people.

  • @PredominateOne

    Like the eruption in Chile right now !

  • Climate Cover-Up

    energybulletin. net/node/51375

    The Real Climate Scandal

    monbiot. com/archives/2009/12/07/ the-real-climate-scandal

    "When I use the term denial industry, I'm referring to those who are paid to say that manmade global warming isn't happening. The great majority of people who believe this have not been paid: they have been DUPED.

    Reading 'Climate Cover-Up,' you keep stumbling across familiar phrases and concepts ... seen every day on comment threads. The book shows that ..."

  • "... these memes were planted by PR companies and hired experts.

    The first case study I've posted reveals how a coalition of U.S. coal companies sought to persuade people that the science is uncertain. It listed the two social groups it was trying to reach -- 'older, less educated males' and 'younger, lower-income women' and the methods [to fool] them. One of its findings was that 'members of the public feel more confident expressing opinions on others' motivations and tactics than they do ..."

  • "... expressing opinions of scientific issues.'

    Remember this, next time you hear people claiming that climate scientists are only in it for the money, or that environmentalists are trying to create a communist world government: these ideas were devised and broadcast by energy companies....

    In Climate Cover-Up ... you can find dozens of such examples. Together they expose a systematic, well-funded campaign to con the public. To judge by the comments you can read on [YouTube] it has worked."

  • @substanti8 "In Climate Cover-Up ... you can find dozens of such examples. Together they expose a systematic, well-funded campaign to con the public. To judge by the comments you can read on [YouTube] it has worked."

    Link us to just one of these "dozens" of examples that contains the proven crude, undeniable intent to manipulate, found in that of the liars involved in the East Anglia email expose ( a "peer-reviewed" example, naturally).

  • @CodeTwo2

    It's a book, Beavis, not a web site.

    Ever heard of books?

  • @substanti8 "It's a book, Beavis, not a web site.

    Ever heard of books?"

    What the hell are you talking about?

  • @CodeTwo2

    Still waiting for your explanation of how an atmospheric CO2 content unparalleled in over 15 million years is nothing to worry about.

    .

    [sound of crickets]

    .

  • @substanti8 "Still waiting for your explanation of how an atmospheric CO2 content unparalleled in over 15 million years is nothing to worry about."

    The old "ignore & switch" technique. Like I said, where are the examples of lies and deliberate tactical cover-up, as per you-know-where?

    There have been many "unparalled" levels/events by measurement in the evolution of Earth, each time there's a "first". That's the nature of it. As to it being man-made: it's political opportunism.

  • The current level of atmospheric CO2 is higher than at any time in the past 15 million years.

    tiny. cc/Tripati

    When CO2 was last that high, "global temperatures were 5 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit higher than they are today, the sea level was approximately 75 to 120 feet higher than today, there was no permanent sea ice cap in the Arctic, and [there was] very little ice on Antarctica and Greenland."

  • @substanti8 So, based on that "reasoning," since the carbon level is so high now, "higher than at any time in the past 15 million years," if there were a direct relation, the global temperatures would be 5 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit and the sea levels would be approximately 75 to 120 feet higher RIGHT NOW. Fuzzy logic begets fuzzy results, apparently.

    Plants breathe carbon dioxide, exhale oxygen, and grow up to become part of the food chain. Everybody benefits from the additional carbon dioxide.

  • @JustinThought1980

    "RIGHT NOW."

    Nope. The Earth's climate is not like the instant gratification that you probably expect; it doesn't respond instantaneously. It's more like the Titanic hitting an iceberg. It took several hours for the ship to sink in 1912.

    Scientists have used mass spectrometry to prove that the 40% extra CO2 in the atmosphere came from burning fossil fuels, not from any natural process, as you falsely implied:

    sindark. com/2009/11/18/ climate-change-isotopic-ratios

  • @substanti8 "there was no permanent sea ice cap in the Arctic, and [there was] very little ice on Antarctica and Greenland." You say that like it's a bad thing. What's wrong with having all that additional arable land, what with the "global overpopulation"?

    This just shows that you can take any statistic and hype it into what looks like a horrible disaster. And also obvious is the fact that there's always somebody ready to take it, hook, line, and sinker. "There's a sucker born every minute!"

  • @JustinThought1980

    "You say that like it's a bad thing."

    Because it is:

    IPCC AR4 WG2 19.3.5.2

    tiny cc/nzekm

    "The near-total deglaciation of the Greenland and the West Antarctic ice sheets (WAIS) ... would eventually lead to a sea-level rise of around 7 m and 5 m from Greenland and the WAIS, respectively, with wide-ranging consequences including a reconfiguration of coastlines worldwide and inundation of low-lying areas, particularly river deltas."

    And 12 meters is about 40 feet.

  • Is Vince' resemblance with Max Keiser coincidental?

    haha good job

  • P.S.) Watch out!

    @substanti8 is a full blown automaton who will BURY this thread in abject CAGW propaganda.

  • The scientific theory of anthropogenic global warming is based on irrefutable conclusions from the thermodynamic properties of greenhouse gases and from empirical evidence:

    watch?v=yLYqzIhhT6o

    All of these things are changing:

    When seasons change

    When flowers bloom

    When birds migrate

    When animals mate or spawn

    When streams reach their peak flow

    When ice breaks on frozen lakes

    dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06937

  • @substanti8 Go science!

  • @substanti8 "The scientific theory of anthropogenic global warming is based on irrefutable conclusions from the thermodynamic properties of greenhouse gases and from empirical evidence"

    Hmm... new one slipped in there; "empirical evidence". Interesting, because any previous empirical evidence cited by those opposed to this charade, was shot down as not being "peer-reviewed" or "flawed", or "funded by vested interests", or "anecdotal etc. etc.

    Too late. Cat's out the bag. LIES.

  • @CodeTwo2

    dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06937

    Read and learn. Your brain might hurt initially, but it will be good for you in the long run.

    watch?v=yLYqzIhhT6o

  • @substanti8 Thanks for your concern, but I HAVE read; lots of it, from both "sides". I'm no scientist (as far as go meteorology and climate at least). My brain didn't hurt, but was concerned to realize the enormous political weighting driving the "it's humanity's fault" camp, not to mention the widely-known (but now hushed) frauds unearthed. Never seen the like from the "don't believe it" camp, either politically or fraudulently, including the scope of so-called vested interests.

    I'm a "NO".

  • @CodeTwo2

    I don't believe for a minute that you've read the research from peer-reviewed journals.

    "frauds unearthed"

    You mean fossil-fueled propaganda that you swallowed.

    Perhaps you could try to explain how an atmospheric CO2 content unparalleled in over 15 million years is nothing to worry about.

  • @substanti8 "I don't believe for a minute that you've read the research from peer-reviewed journals".

    Believe what you like - are you psychic? Funny, you even slipped in the "peer-reviewed" angle.

    "You mean fossil-fueled propaganda that you swallowed."

    Classic! Any "propaganda" such as exists, is kicked into oblivion by the pants-down, bang-to-rights outright LYING that emerged from a certain "credible" establishment in East Anglia, you'll recall. Outright, deliberate FIDDLING.

  • Great for the Sheeple who cannot fathom the SCAM that Man Made Global Warming is!!!

    The screw balls think we need to build more Fukashimas - Lord help the Sheeples for they may end up killing us all of tax schemes that do nothing but line the pockets of the schemers and raise the cost of safe energy to the moon - as Obummer has said that under his plan, he "will necessarily skyrocket the costs of energy" Wake Up Sheeple. Man Made Global Warming is a SCAM!

  • Very creative, thumbs up

  • genius stuff. keep it coming :)

  • made in germany. everyone knows the german nazis make great expropriation scheme stuff

  • When their budget is cut they tell the truth to try to get it back.

    /watch?v=6b2Rzy0wUNA

    Pay attention to what the first guy says and what the announcer says at 5:27 into the vid. They all seem to agree that its something in space causing this and its going to get much worse.

  • Very clever! Our prime minister by default, Juliar Gillard and her bogus Green/Labor Govt are hell bent on introducing a carbon tax, despite lying to the people that they wouldn't introduce one before the last election. They've stopped listening to the people and it's going to end badly for them come next election. We think she's the Aussie equivalent of the Obama plush toy - the red headed witch. Not recommended for children under 15.

  • This should be used in the Republican campaign. Another good example of exposing them for the idiots that they truly are.

  • @muziker I take it you called the 800 number right after the infomercial to purchase your CarbonWow! No more misplaced guilt for you brave shopper. Whoopy! Call now and get a free Al Gore bobblehead doll. It has a microscopic carbon footprint.

  • this was awwwwwwwwwwwwssssssssssssssooo­ooooooooommmmmeeeeee

  • We finally got our first dislike showcasing a strong resistance to a Trojan Horse Tax to save the world. Yawn

  • Great! Very funny! And so true (can't win either way, can we, not as it stands now).

    We must wake up everyone to their true agenda, and this way people will resist.

  • Hmm... been posted for two days, and no brainwashed-scyophant-end-of-t­he-earth-I-believe-all-the-CO2 bullshit-please-take-everythin­g-I-own-and-all-my-money-to-re­lieve-my-guilt shills have appeared yet to say things like "retard, 'tard, tin foil hat, peer-reviewed or melting polar ice caps etc."...

  • @CodeTwo2 Maybe they don't comprehend sarcasm...lol

  • @CodeTwo2 hahahha

  • @CodeTwo2 it's like the twilight zone. Awfully quiet in here... !

  • Ahh, but does it blow?

  • hahahah!

  • does it come with an Obama plush toy......Oh I so baddly want an obama plush toy.

  • "it sucks !! No, seriously it literally sucks" hahaha xD

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more