Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is one reason why I continue to say that the Bible IS NOT the Word of God, but only humans' shared understanding of the Word of God (which is written on their hearts AND REWRITTEN ON EVERY HEART THAT HEARS.)

    Like I might say if I spoke about the Word to a group of people, "None of the words I give you come from God; God gives me his Word, but I can only give you my understanding of it. It's up to YOU to take these words to God: if he agrees or disagrees, so will your heart."

  • why Christians always quotes Paul and not Jesus? They all follow pastor Paul..

  • @joselinema Paul is St. Paul the Apostle of Jesus Christ. Read the Bible he wrote letters to the Romans, Corinthians, Ephesians, Theselonians etc in the Holy Bible through the Holy Spirit. So he is one of the founders of true Biblical Christianity.

  • @RockSteadyGirl555 Yes the Roman Catholic whore harlot put his letters in the bible. The abomination that causes desolation stading at the Holy place. 1/3 are christian in this world and 1/3 will be destroy. 1/3 also hates God's Laws (Torah) because of false Paul who had the spirit of satan.

  • Im not trying to go to far, But im sure some people changed some words in the bible. I Also have friends that are Christians and almost all of theme don't fallow the religion,

  • @0x00xMoex00x0 hey, christian missionaries fabricated and added the verses of their own in bible...original injeel is not available ...! most of the verses are man made

  • @way2islam100 Why would they change something that god gave them.?

  • @0x00xMoex00x0 They changin with wrong intension of their self interest to avoid most of the God's verses which are difficult to obey, and to mislead the people..!

  • @0x00xMoex00x0 then they are not Christian, they just say they are. True Christians read the Bible and know that it is the infalliable word of God. There are fake Bibles out there, the only true are the Reformers Bibles such as the original 1566 Geneva Bible and the King James version and the ESV translations. The Catholic Bible is fake.

  • Wtf

  • "The King James bible was not given by God but was a translation by a group of scholars in the early 17th century who based their rendition on a faulty Greek text". Bart Ehrman, "Misquoting Jesus"

  • There is no perfect answer here. Modern translations discredit many verses in the footnotes. While there is a lot to be said for the KJV, the disappointing fact is that the KJV is polluted with the pagan fables of the period as it promotes the existence of dragons and unicorns. And what's more disappointing is that most in professional ministry do not want to publicly discuss either of these problems.

  • @gsschoenfeld Research those words you think are fables. I have done this and it's worth the time to find out what and how they were translated from. There are answers out there for honest researchers. :)

  • @dallywally72 Oh, perhaps you misunderstand me. I've studied the issue in exhaustive detail. I don't think the original authors of the Hebrew manuscripts believed in unicorns, but the translators of the KJV believed in them and that's what they went with.

  • @gsschoenfeld Then in your exhaustive research you would have seen there is a certain (species/class) beast with the name unicorn in the title. It's not that hard to find out. Take a minute to look it up, then come back. If you don't want to, then don't.

  • @dallywally72 Some try to pass off the unicorns in the bible as a breed of rhinoceros along the India-Nepal border. That rhino did not get its unicorn name until the 19th century, over 300 years after the KJV was published. It is not a compelling case, because these creatures were entirely foreign to the bible authors and KJV translators.

    What is more compelling is the depictions of unicorns in artwork during the period and earlier. Such artwork clearly depicts the fabled 1 horned horse.

  • @gsschoenfeld Your reasoning on the matter is against the translators true intentions of revealing God's word to us. Do you really think they meant the reader to believe in a fairy tale? Come on!

  • @dallywally72 I think it's a bit naive to assume that the KJV translators had such pure motives. Their translation needed to fit the agenda of the government. Past governments of England had executed bible translators, so they were unlikely to rock the boat. The translation had to be accepted by the masses, and other translations of the period also promoted the existence of dragons and unicorns. Thanks for your thoughtful inquiry, people should have more conversations about these matters.

  • @gsschoenfeld The ultimate agenda of this world is to deny Jesus Christ as the Messiah and our saviour. When the King James version was finally authorized, the Vatican was in an uproar and seeked to destroy England's involvement with the Bible through the gun powder plot, which was unsuccessful. The Jesuits today are against the KJV, hence all these new versions are translated from Aleph and B & Douay-Rheims/Westcott & Hort corrupted versions. It's an Occult agenda.

  • @dallywally72 The more likely motivations are that modern ministry leaders are embarrassed of how groups like the Westboro Baptist Church interpret the KJV and choose to distance themselves from it. I'm not defending the modern translations, I think the greater-evil is committed in their translation; I just don't regard the KJV as entirely perfect.

  • @gsschoenfeld the Geneva Bible of 1566 is supposed to be amazing its got the reformers notes in it. You can get it on Amazon. Just don't buy Sprouls and Pakers version they changed the reformers original notes from saying the Pope is antichrist to something else.

  • @dallywally72 they are even translating the Geneva Bible reformers notes into other things i read reviews on the Sproul and Packer translation of the Geneva into NKJV bible. Sad.

  • @gsschoenfeld IMO the most accurate translation is the Young's Literal Translation as literary accuracy was the primary goal. Like the KJV it was translated from majority texts, and doesn't excessively discredit scripture within footnotes. The YLT is certainly not the most readable, and I don't claim it's 100% perfect, but I double check with it on important issues.

  • @gsschoenfeld I also double check scriptures, I look at two Greek translations from either side and compare the KJV with a newer translation at the same time. In other words two Greek Interlinear translations. I grew up only using the New World Translation which I now consider burning material lol. The King James has taught me the proper way. That doesn't mean that I don't look at other versions though. I hope you watch the documentary 'A lamp in the dark the untold history of the bible'.

  • @dallywally72 Amen brother :) you can also get the Geneva 1566 on amazon its got the notes of the reformers in there.

  • @gsschoenfeld there was also a time before the flood where it says Giants roamed the earth and Gods mated with human women and had babies. its not really that far fetched to believe unicorns existed at some point. Why not? We know the flood wiped off all of these things for the most part though there are theories of things within the earth.

  • For thousands of years the Woman Ridding on the Beast been trying to destroy the Word of God. Praise the LORD we still have copies in its complete version and not the corrupted ones like the Vatican does.

  • As someone interested in the symbols used by followers of the occult mystery religions it caught my eye that at 2:37 the logo for The American Bible Society has a sun incorporated in it which may allude to a hidden Luciferian agenda.

  • Thats why I only read and preach from the KJV (King James Version) which Rome tried to destroy throughout the history. You will see Rome in the coming age fulfill Revelation which they start killing Sabbath Keepers who follow the 4th Commandment. May Christ come soon...

  • What the F**K!!! The word Antichrist was removed from a new Bible? Now the Vatican wants to remove the Book of Revelation too? The Vatican used the name of Jehovah inside their own Churches's walls and in their Tomb Stones until 1942. In 1989 the Vatican removed the name of Jehovah from the Old Testament of the NKJV and years later in 2008 the Pope send a Warning letter to any Catholics not to use the name of Jehovah God anymore. The Vatican are Back to their old Inquisition tricks again.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more