Added: 1 year ago
From: CBSNewsOnline
Views: 2,759
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Classic liberal tactic. Change the subject and attack. 

  • im a conserative and im black .....

  • Yes, eventually she started getting a little irritated by the intellectually dishonest cretin that is Deutsch who persisted to imply she was talking about Jews (as in people from Israel) after changing the goal posts from religion in order to get publicity for his dying show which went off air shortly thereafter. And of course he claimed to be unimpressed with her explanation; he could not have been more transparent in trying to make out everything she said up to that point to be offensive.

  • "i never said jews need to be perfected?" the hell, i just finished watching that video a minute ago! LOL. and what's with all these "distraction" blaming games? of course liberals do it, and conservatives too, and the soviets, and nazis as well, and every other political entity that had ever been in existence. gosh people, stop thinking that your own party is so pure and clean. -__-

  • @LidiyaShadow "'i never said jews need to be perfected?'" the hell, i just finished watching that video a minute ago! LOL.'

    Her point was that Acker took her out of context in suggesting that what she said was anti-Semitic; any intellectually honest person understands the religious context of what she meant. Acker's point was idiotic as she slipped that reference in very ungracefully in order to...DISTRACT (the REAL irony here).

  • @butMydesign "jews need to be perfected" is her exact words with regards to the religious context. yes, i watched the video, what she said (and then desperately tried to fix) was stupid, crude, and unnecessary. blame it on her lack of better word choices. although i do wonder if the outrageously dumb thing she says is just another ploy to gather media attention. very questionable.

  • @LidiyaShadow She did not hesitate or even blink an eye in explaining her very commonplace sentiment, so I don't know where you are seeing this desperation. She was clearly talking about people who are a part of the Jewish faith and not people of the Jewish race (please tell me you know the difference) unlike Donny Deutsch and Tanya Acker were suggesting; what is "outrageously dumb" about that?

  • @butMydesign did you see only what you wanted to see? that clip was my first impression of coulter. she got so exasperated when donny deutsch started questioning what she meant. he said he was personally offended. they even went into break to avoid the heightening tension. btw, donny was not impressed even after coulter "explained" herself. there is a reason that political correctness exist. btw, contrary to popular believes, there is no such thing as "jewish race". it's a religion.

  • @LidiyaShadow ouch, butMydesign really made you look not so smart. It's like he's Ann and you're Tanya all over again! I'm so sick of people like Tanya and Donny Deutsch continually trying to take quotes of context to make it look offensive, just so it can go perfectly with your agenda. by focusing the attention from Ann's great points and their lousy ones, we can talk about how Ann is a "racist", while they are perfect little angels. how convenient. so typical and sickening.

  • Comment removed

  • what did i lye about ur the one lying that blocked me from the other video of the that women talking shit about all men i never blocked ur dumb ass

  • @imcrazy85

    i cant block you from someone elses vid,you were blocked by them,and i dont blame them

  • i guess no one noticed ann's hotpocket(vagina) showing as she crossed her legs at 2:13!!! lmao

  • @imcrazy85

    i watched this because of your comment from your page,you say i blocked you when you've commented three times,so i go to your page,and i'm blocked.so i read your activity,you lie again,this was no sharon stone moment,i'm a dog and i saw nothing, nothing.

  • @areyoulookinatmepal1 i dont know where u got the crack ur smoking but uhm dogs dont type and who r u and wtf r u talking about in this video all i said is did anyone notice her panties pussy showing at 2:13

  • I love Ann Coulter! she is just Straight forward!

  • nigger be dumb

  • This is the way socialists operate. The intent is to befuddle by accusing the opposition of doing precisely what the socialist is doing. Truth is immaterial. The perception and end result is what counts. I responded to an idiot calling Drudge a race baiter and got a long rant calling me a racist after which I was banned from responding. And all I did was defend Matt Drudge. These people are shameless and you have to simply wade into them and show that you won't be cowed by nonsense.

  • tanya acker looks like a fool. is she crazy

  • "Speaking of distractions, I find it very ironic, all due respect to Ann, to get a lecture on race relations from someone who said that Jews need to be perfected"

    Speaking of distractions indeed! The only distraction here Miss Acker is your bringing that up. Thanx for proving once again that liberals cannot debate the merits of someone's argument so instead attempt to discredit the person making the argument. And Coulter was talking about religion not race you intellectually dishonest cretin

  • nice low cut panties frame 2:13

  • Erica Hill, what a moron!

  • @vince33x Its funny. The media is desperate to make the story about Brietbart playing the clip he was sent. And avoiding that the NAACP had the whole video and still denounce the woman as a racist. And that the administration fired her without knowing all the facts. Now we all know if this had happened when Bush was president, they would be reaming Bush. Just remember how they reamed Bush over the attorney firings.

  • @kbar8888 It's more proof of how intensely biased the mainstream media is in favor of the Left-Wing POV. I've been going back & forth w/a Wash Post reporter who insists, if there's any bias in the mainstream media, it's in favor of the Right. Now that's what I call "cognative dissonance!"

  • LOL! The anchor trys to interupt Ann Coulter at 3:00 cause shes making a brilliant point, but Ann just shrugs her off. The media is pityful.

  • "I never said Jews need to be perfected, I was accurately describing the New Testament." Ann Coulter, if that's your holy text, maybe you need a new religion. Because it's in the Bible, you're not accountable for believing it? Repeating it? Wrong. Shame on you for believing such tripe.

  • @lifeisgood63008 If you've ever seen the clip, what she said was, Christians and Jews are basically the same religion. Except Christians believe they need to be "saved" by Jesus, and Jews believe they are "self-perfected". What she said was completely accurate. Deutche just made an ass out of himself by pretending to be offended.

  • @lifeisgood63008 To expand on what kbar8888 said, Coulter said in that interview that Christians think of themselves as perfected Jews because they have completed God's process by accepting Jesus Christ. Deutche was being intellectually dishonest by pretending to be offended as I suspect you are.

  • @butMydesign Ann Coulter CLEARLY said and i Quote "we just want Jews to be perfected"...So she is definitely lying when she said she didnt say that. Ms. Ackers' argument is very valid. she was simply exposing Ann Coulter because everyone knows she says bogus things. Ann is known for taking quotes out of context and lying to forward her agenda.

  • @djbnice7 Her point was that she was taken out of context and that her comment didn't mean what Ms Acker and yourself think it meant. Anyone with half a brain (or who is intellectually honest) understands the religious context of what she was saying. Acker's point was idiotic as she slipped that reference in very ungracefully in order to...DISTRACT (the real irony here) and she was just wrong on the issue.

    As for your other comments on Coulter, well, I think you just blew your credibility.

  • @butMydesign lol my credibility...ok thats cool...but are you aware of how controversial she is? My statements about her did not come from nowhere. u can see her being exposed hear on youtube with the bogus things she says. And yes she makes up things and takes quotes out of context. she makes good points sometimes but backs it up with nonsense. Its fine if you think my credibility is shot but your being intellectually dishonest ignoring that truth.

  • @djbnice7 I am aware of how controversial she seems to so many like yourself who deliberately (or out of sheer stupidity) misinterprets what she says. I find it is her dissenters that do all the lying and context editing.

  • @butMydesign "her dissenters" *sigh*...my friend it comes straight from her mouth. and your little comments in parantheses are cute by the way. If we lived in an Ann Coulter society the philosophy of laws would be a "haven't we done enough for You people" type system towards minorities. and if you dont see anything wrong with that then I respectfully have nothing to say.

  • @djbnice7 You speak with as many specifics as Ms Acker (which is none at all...is that cute enough for you, weirdo?)

  • @butMydesign oh ok great...so u defend yourself with an insult at me and make no sense at the same time. That shows great credibility lol...are u done with our argument? or should I continue? I'll wait for and intellectual response. Not that caveman comment u just left. I Honestly thought I was gonna get a good argument with facts and stuff lol. Somebody done told me wrong LOL

  • @djbnice7 My "little" weirdo comment came after a lot of condescension from you "my friend". You don't exactly have a lot of room to talk "lol".

  • @butMydesign "I think the government should be spying on all Arabs, engaging in torture as a televised spectator sport, dropping daisy cutters wantonly throughout the Middle East and sending liberals to Guantanamo." -Ann Coulter...How about this is that specific enough for u.

  • From the same column: "Among the things that war entails are: killing people (sometimes innocent), destroying buildings (...) and spying on people (...). That is why WAR IS A BAD THING. But once a war starts, it is going to be finished one way or another, and I have a preference for it coming out one way rather than the other."

    Your quote was deliberate hyperbole before getting to her real solution. The day she sincerely makes such a proposal will be the day I'll concede you have a point.

  • @butMydesign She sincerely makes such a proposal many times. She clearly says her perferct world would be a world where everyone is christian...(the same interview where she says that Jews need to be perfected) how about a world where everyone has freedom to believe what they want. Catch my drift?

  • @djbnice7 Yeah, my perfect world would be one where everyone agreed with me too. I guess that make me a bigot also. Unless she proposed that non Christians should be forcibly converted (which she did not) I don't see a problem with her fantasy. You cannot deny that this world would at least be a lot better off if we all had the same religion.

  • @butMydesign "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity." -Ann COulter....Is that good...want more?

  • @djbnice7 She explained your last quote (We should invade...) in her (OFTEN edited) "take a camel" speech. I suggest you take a look.

  • @butMydesign The mere fact that she makes such oddly specific offensive speech is evidence of her mindset...even in the context in which it is said. There's plenty more. Im trying to help you understand her mindset and its ok if you agree with her. U just have to admit her "haven't we done enough for you people" mindset. But im not getting anywhere with this. I think you dont understand because you simply dont want to. She can explain her hate all she wants it just sucks that some people buy it

  • @djbnice7 I don't care one way or another about her mindset. Unlike Ms Acker, I care about the merits of one's arguments and not about discrediting the person making the argument. And you've made this "haven't we done enough for you people" argument twice now and you still haven't given me a specific example.

  • @djbnice7 Sorry, but we've been over that comment. Do you have any sincerely made comments to cite? And I guess you just concede my other point.

  • @butMydesign lol no we haven't been over that comment and u asked for an example and gave u one...and u "dont care about her mindset"... really? the thing that drives everything she says. ok buddy. And your guessing that im conceding to your point is absolutely right...its a guess. U have no idea what your saying.Stop it..................sssStop it! (mother aggressively talking to her two year old child)

  • @djbnice7 No I don't care about how she personally feels about certain things so long as I see the logic in her sincerely made policy statements of which your quote was not an example (which, yes, we have already established). You put way too much stock in people's personal lives. And yes, your lack of response to our "perfect world" debate tells me you either haven't seen it or you have no defense (i.e. you concede the point). Is there any other way to see it?

  • @butMydesign But Im wasting my time with you because anyone who takes her seriously has a very limited view of the world. I honestly dont understand how an educated person can respect the words that come out of her mouth. But to each his own i guess. And thats exactly what most conservatives are about... their own. Your doing a great job defending her by the way trying to win the argument without backing your case with evidence or examples...just by trying to prove me wrong. LOL classic

  • @djbnice7 You are the one making the accusations, therefore the burden of proof falls on YOU. So far the best you've done is to cite a quote that I have already proven (using specific evidence) to be mere hyperbole and not meant to be taken into sincere consideration. I've referenced this video as well as others while you have shown your fundamentally inaccurate understanding of them. I'm still waiting for you to respond to some of my counter arguments, which again suggests you concede my point.

  • @butMydesign LOL The burden of Proof...lol u sound like Fox news LOL. Yeah say a bunch of crap and not back it up with facts. Go ahead keep arguing with me and think you dont have to back up anything. "The burden of Proof falls on You"...when people go to school we learn that you have to back your argument up with proof or facts. yeah u single handedly murdered yourself with that one. Im waiting for you to counter my argument with facts lol. but I just misunderstand everything right lol

  • @djbnice7 Seriously, I highly recommend you figure out what's causing your progressive loss of brain cells. I'm confident in everything I've said to leave this conversation as is. I'd just be repeating myself from here anyway.

    In response to everything you've previously said, I'll leave you with one "argument" you seem to understand in abundance: L...O...L...

  • @butMydesign yet again...no substance. I assume u didnt watch my video recommendation? Or maybe you have and have no intelligent defense without throwing insults. oh and I have to laugh out loud at ignorance...sorry.

  • @djbnice7 People who respect her opinion even if they don't agree know the difference between Judaism and the Jewish race; hyperbole and sincerity; and they know what it means to be perfected in a religious context. CLEARLY it is the UNeducated who don't respect her and have a limited knowledge of the world. I'm the one wasting time here.

  • @butMydesign *sigh* u tire me. please dont tell me you believe everything she says is misunderstood...that every educated person misunderstands her please. how about this type in youtube "ann coulter slanted" click the "Al Franken challenges..." one and tell me what you think. Im pretty sure you'll come up with some excuse but I just refuse to believe you really agree with this woman.

  • @djbnice7 To expand on why I don't care about people's mindset, Coulter cited a list of examples of racism in this debate and Acker's counter argument was to accuse her of anti-Semitism. Even if that were true it doesn't change the factuality of anything she had previously said. It's a logical fallacy which you said was a valid argument; any educated person knows it is not.

  • @djbnice7 I have no idea what YOU are saying as you don't communicate your ideas very well. What in the world does "haven’t we done enough for You people" mean? It's not exactly the most efficient way of saying whatever it is you're trying to say. I thought you must have been talking about Coulter's anti-reparations stance but when you cited your Coulter quote as an example of such a mindset you completely lost me. Care to explain my immature friend?

  • @butMydesign sorry i had a life to attend to. but yeah "havent we done enough for you people" when the majority does things for a minority to get them to shut up. not respecting their humanity or not excepting them as equals. Ok we set the slaves free havent we done enough for you people. Ok we gave woman the right to vote havent we done enough for you people. It is evident her mindset represents that philosophy. She doesnt care about the poor, minorities, or non-Christians.

  • @djbnice7 So in other words you're saying she's a racist. Do you have any proof other than that same quote that was not meant to be taken seriously? I have a feeling we're not going to agree on what's racist though, as you seem like the type who thinks minorities deserve special treatment--that something is owed them based on the sins of the past. I disagree. I just don't believe, for example, one should be compensated because their forefathers were slaves.

  • @butMydesign yeah like i said im wasting time so im just gonna set the record straight. There are many other quotes which I do not even care anymore to bring to your attention (google it its there). its funny u picked the slave thing when i mentioned woman as well but whatever. Minorities just want to be treated like they contributed to the very foundation of this country...equally. No im not one of those people that believe in compensation. Minorities dont want to be treated like second class

  • I can't believe that Tanya Acker has a Yale Law degree. I promise you, I argued better than her when I was in the seventh grade. Ann Coulter ripped her to shreds.

  • Wow, Tanya argues like a high schooler.

  • Ann is right here. Her counterpart here once again falsely accused Ann of anti-semitism and/or racism towards Jews. She was blatant and unapologetic for it. Liberals call Ann, Laura Ingraham, Michelle Malkin, and Sarah Palin "racists" all the time.

    The Sherrod incident proves what we already know: sometimes people are accused of racism falsely. Yet the media only comes out swinging in the defense of liberals.

    Sherrod now knows what it's like to be a conservative woman.

  • I am getting annoyed by the slutty way people/women dress on "news" shows....They are getting thinner and thinner and the skirts are getting shorter and shorter....one can see anes knickers at 2:13!!!! Flash news is what american news is becoming!!

  • i think every candidate should go tru presidential training or something instead of just saying vote for me that way they can be prepared for what they are going to face when they enter the white house.

  • @jinkazamalovnat thank you

  • I didnt vote so i dont care lol

  • I voted for BO cause he is black.

  • @floatingcompassmedia thats a stupid reason. =.=

  • @XxXDevilCatXxX i think most people did and it is stupid

  • @XxXDevilCatXxX please, that was a large part of his election. Black people singing in the streets "We won". So far, so what...he sucks like Bush anyway.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more