Added: 2 years ago
From: southernavenger
Views: 61,395
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (657)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why does Ron Paul hate America?

  • @MrLowC88 he doesn't

  • Well Glen Beck must really hate President George W Bush.as  Bush said QUOTE ( WE ARE BUILDING A NEW WORLD ORDER)

  • One thing. I respectfully submit that during GW Bush's presidency there was plenty of talk on the right side of the aisle about government being too big. Especially after the passing of Sarbanes Oxley and No Child Left Behind. Even "mainstream" conservative media outlets complained about the national debt increasing under GW. Keep in mind that GW was not alone because from 2006-2008 (and on to 2010) dems controlled both the senate and the house and, thus, government spending.

  • I'm not a fan of Beck but I agree that the foreign policy of Wilson that we still follow is a shame. It's about imperialism. Even general Smedley D. Butler admitted this discussing interventions in central and south america. It's no coincidence that Wilson got us the federal reserve system which makes this foreign policy possible. The federal reserve works 2 ways: it gives the government the power to spend without taxing and it gives the banks a fraudulent way of loaning money that doesnt exist.

  • Mark Levin is a Liberal. Listen to how hateful he is. I am very conservative, libertarian even, and this guy is a liar, and a hate monger. He gives us all a bad name. This guy hates Jesus. Its obvious.

  • @mikelunz correct

  • Is there anyone Mark Levin doesn't hate? He's the most vituperative guy I've ever heard (with the possible exception of Michael Savage).

    Anyone who works as hard as Levin to disparage other people has serious issues with their own identity and self-image. That's his problem, not mine, but what puzzles me is why so many people listen to someone so damaged, mean-spirited, and unimaginative.

  • levin is an idiot beyond compare

  • Comment removed

  • hey genius, like the sound of the national debt over 100% of GDP? The gold standard forces discipline on govt loving assholes more than it restricts the economy, the US was on a modified gold standard as late as 1971, the balance of trade deficits got too large to back payments in gold, that opened the flood gates for govt loving assholes to run unchecked all over the world and the results are finally coming in. The Euro is dead, finished, a great lesson to all...govt loving assholes are exempt.

  • @Baileygeep7 I am a conservative but u are full of shit..Their are quite a few European countries that are doing far better economically than the US at the moment with "a social democracy large government" style of rule.It doesn't work in America but it sure as hell does work in Scandinavia, Canada, parts of Western Europe, Oceania

    Like I said I am a conservative but I have a pet peeve for liars who distort the truth. Just because it failed in Greece/Spain/Italy doesn't mean it failed elsewhere

  • @yobro250 So far, 9 socialist eurozone failures and counting, that's a fairly substantial number, don'tcha think? The entire west is a cluster fuck of mutually-assured socialist self-destruction and you're out there looking for the dwindling supply of exceptions, the NYT, krugman, keynesian flake in you is a bit too much to hide, drop the convincing yourself you're a conservative, it doesn't work for any of the republican candidates either.

  • @Baileygeep7 I am a conservative..I'm just an honest conservative who doesn't need to lie to prove a point..Last I checked Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland( through they have had a rough patch as of late, France, Germany are all doing quite well..Yes some do poorly but others do quite well..No need to make it such a black and white issue like you partisan hacks always attempt to do.Their are plenty of strict capitalist countries that are doing poorly just like Greece etc is

  • @yobro250The attacks on socialism really bother you don't they, thats collectivist, not conservative, if you like huntsman, have you ever heard of this guy called obama, you'll love him, he's cutting the military just like you want, he's a mulatto, you probably like that also, it goes with the diversity obsession you've had shoved up your ass all your life as well as the affirmative action you're probably getting a little bit of, socialism is a self defeating disease, parasites love it

  • @Baileygeep7 No wrong dipshit....LIES bother me...I hate liars who distort information to fit their hack blindly partisan ideology...

    I asked you to list the 9 countries...Don't change the subject prick

    Lol aww look at the cute strawman arguments... Going right into race and the "omg you must be lazy argument" is that you Michael Weiner?

  • @Baileygeep7

    Obama being a mulatto means nothing...Why the hell would that affect my opinion on him one way or another? See the thing is....you are not a real conservative...You're just some racist white trash loser..Whats the matter? A black guy take your girlfriend? Lol!

    Of course I want to cut military spending...I don't know if you noticed but we are having a debt crisis...I want to cut spending across the board because I'm not a hypocrite. Military spending is out of control

  • @yobro250 What happened faggot, lose your boyfriend to some israeli? 9 eurozone countries had their debt downgraded last week, evidently NPR told you going broke was sophisticated, in case you missed it, it's also one of obama's few accomplishments, neck and neck with france, you couldn't be happier. Israel and Egypt combined get a third of all US foreign aid, you didn't mention Egypt and since you hate liars so much, can you tell Ron Paul to run as a libertarian, he's no republican.

  • @Baileygeep7 Well we are not on the verge of fighting a war for Egypt...If we did I wouldn't certainly be upset...and plus they are not oppressing another group of people.

    Nope didn't lose my boyfriend to Israel...but I did lose alot of my hard earned money to them...Such a shame but hopefully Ron Paul gets in and this welfare state of Israel gets the boot...No more free money for the parasites! They can defend themselves on their own.

  • @yobro250 Name one laissez-faire strict market system, textbook dumbass. Paul has said he's only running as a republican because libertarians and worse constitutional conservatives don't get media attention, since he's at least admitted he's no republican, you become the liar. Are you saying we should fight a war for Egypt?.."If we did I wouldn't certainly be upset." You really are a fosisticated man of the world, the embodiment of all the indoctrination efforts of the left, amazing.

  • @Baileygeep7 Sure just look at Somalia etc...By why are you dodging my original question? Once again name the 9 failing states dipshit...Not because I value your opinion in even the slightest way but because I am just interested in seeing them

    I am a conservative but not a hardcore Libertarians..Hardcore libertarians and Marxists are similar. Both will give you a lecture about how their dream country has never actually existed, but for some reason its still the greatest model ever.

  • @Baileygeep7 Once again more idiotic strawman arguments.Sophistication has nothing to do with it nor do I like/support European social democracies..but they certainly do work for some countries and not work for others..Just as strict free market laissez faire market systems works for some and fails for others.

    Ron Paul is running as a constitutional conservative..Yes he is a republican but he does not endorse any republican candidate that he disagrees with(pretty much all of them)

  • @Baileygeep7 And I was very against our involvement in the Libyan conflict...Just like I will be when we inevitably get involved in Iran to defend our welfare boyfriend Israel...Atleast that's if anyone but Ron Paul gets elected.

  • @Baileygeep7 "parasites love it"

    I know, just ask Americas favorite welfare bum....Israel

    No more wars for this ungrateful welfare bum state of Israel over some retarded text written by poor farmers 3000 years ago..I don't have any problem with Jews but Israel is a burden on the hard working American taxpayer and it is of little strategic importance to us..Let the go to war with Iran on their own damn time and without our help if they want to..Cut all spending balance the budget

  • Comment removed

  • @Baileygeep7 I am very conservative on nearly every economic issue..But I ( unlike you) am not an obsessed partisan hack who hates all other points of views...Let me guess you probably think liberals are evil and you probably have zero liberal friends of any kind? Yeah just a typical hack who takes politics way to seriously

    Most of the republican candidates are not conservative..Atleast foreign policy wise they want to spend&spend&spend..Paul and Huntsman are the true conservatives

  • I'd say unimproved and falling Glenn Beck myself. NeoConservatives is a word used commonly by liberals until Paul CATTLE came onto the damn scene. Why is this crazy old bastard even in the GOP? Let him be what he IS. A Liberaltarian. No I didn't misspell that.

    How the arrogant, presumptive, little Neville Chamberlain/Paul supporters can go forth with their rapture at this "NEW AND BETTER WAY" of interpreting the Constitution to their liking is disgusting. Most of his supporters are KKK,..cont.

  • ..,Neo Nazi's, 9/11 Conspiracy NUTS,LIBERALS,and outright fools that just go with him, because he preaches he's different than everyone else. He certainly is that,Ron Paul, but he is different in the BAD way.Have we not learned from damn HISTORY what happens with Isolationism and don't any of you DARE say Paul isn't an isolationist. He IS PERIOD. It fails. World War III would be a Paul presidency. No matter.He is NOT going to win and the nuts can go back in the closet. Common Sense will prevail.

  • Back to the "NeoConservatives" deal. A Neocon or Neo-Conservative is a former democrat turned Socially Liberal Republican and that is ALL a NeoCon is. I certainly am not a NeoCon and I've been called that by countless fools that I have destroyed in debate for they did not know what they actually spoke of supporting this old fool Paul.

    I suggest historical reading about World War II and Isolationism back then. I suggest KNOWING that gold is LIMITED in supply and that we...cont.

  • ....have dug most of it up that is reachable with current technology. Gold is raising in value for more reasons than economic indicators. Going back to the Gold Standard which INCREASED the Recovery Time of the Great Depression when implemented in these times would do nothing, but cause an economic disaster.

    The facts escape Paul "Cattle". Think for yourself. Don't act like a Liberal/Socialist fool..as most Paul supporters/Cattle I have argued with act JUST LIKE THEM in "debate".

  • Southern faggot more like...

  • Poor grasp of basic logic.

  • Clearly explained, insightful analysis of the many self-serving individuals and groups makes this 'current reality' video is a real winner in my book. Knowing the key players is important, knowing that all the players play for the same team is essential to understanding the world, people and events happening around us today. Hopefully it will be the Epiphany for many that begins the Third Great Awakening,or as some of like to refer to it as 'The Truth' at last, thank God, 'The Truth' at last.

  • Levinsky is an asshole, he looks like a serial killer, he could be Heimler for the Gingrich 4th Reich

  • NEWT NOW

  • anybody who listens to Ron Paul is FULL RETARD...I ALSO DON'T LISTEN TO LEVIN!

  • @dmbruce75

    ron paul supporters are the most deceitful people in the United States PERIOD !!! END THE RON PAUL SUPPORTER DECEIT 2012 !!!

  • @DrWrongPaul Agreed that Ron Paul is NOT a Conservative and is INSANE.

    He will not win. TRUE Conservatives will NEVER vote that coo coo clock old addled mind into the office of the Presidency. He would cause World War III and become the 21st Century Neville Chamberlain. Beck is disappointing in this video as well. I didn't know he had gone off the rail so far as to become idiotic and more in line with the mentally unstable old fart Ron Paul.

  • you people need medication~ anyone who disagrees with you you call progressives.....Ron Paul is Crazy! You are just as bad as "The Left" Sarah Palin, would fight wars, and take on Iran~unlike Ron Paul, Palin, Bachman, etc would attack Iran....Ron Paul makes Obama look like a Conservative. I agree with him on some domestic issues, but not much else! He's to "The Left" of Obama on forein policy and is not the constitutionalist he claims to be!

  • @dmbruce75 Finally someone with common sense.

  • @dmbruce75 to say ron paul makes obama look conservative means you have no clue of either what conservative actually is or who ron paul is. ron paul can almost be considered a libertarian, which is no where near the left

  • From the movie Tropic Thunder, "you never go full retard..." ... Well, if you listen and think Mark Levin and other neo-cons are right... you my friend have gone FULL RETARD

  • @Elvishairdude89 Does that make it right that the majority of americans approved of something? Certainly not.

  • I like Levin better than Glenn Beck by fair - Glenn Beck's one of the dumber conservative commenter, almost like a watered-down version of Alex Jones.

    Personally I like "neoconservatives" way better than Ron Paul, I think they have way more common sense - these "Ron Paul libertarians" are often fanatical and worship him or guys like Beck with almost a cult-like fervor, and trash anyone, even conservatives who disagree with them. That' scarier than "neocons" - these "charismatic leaders".

  • @Elvishairdude89 Beck loves wars, he is a neo-con...

  • Levin is a arrogant, pompous dumbass. He's a total tool that will use terrible insults against people he disagrees with, not to mention never actually talking with them.

    Levin loves to say in his grouchy grandma voice "Ru Paul is no conservative". Well then Levin, you are no conservative either. Get out of our way, dumbass with the fastest shrinking radio audience. You, and your inbred audience, are sheeple tools.

  • @WestSkier11 No offense, but you sound pretty arrogant yourself. You sure you're not working on your own new world order?

  • @WestSkier11

    I think "Butt Surfer 11" is a better name for you

  • First of all, Levin doesn't "hate" Beck. Like any other conservative, as he did with Bush and his growth of govt and spending, Levin calls conservatives on their shortcomings. And by the way, I saw one comment say that Levin had no followers? Try 8 million listeners buddy.

  • who ever made this is an idiot. He leaves out ALL the true facts

  • McCain is not a conservative but he is not a communist like Obama.

    Mark Levin is the best !

  • the SS vs the SA...

  • My thoughts exactly!

  • I tend to agree with Beck and Levin, but on this specific matter Beck was wrong - there is NO WAY this country would be worse off than it is now if McCain had won. NO. WAY.

    Yes, McCain is a FRAUD and unworthy of the conservative label. Ditto Bush, to a slightly lesser degree. And don't forget, had McCain won we'd also have Palin as VP, and I'd like to think she might have been a moderating (toward true conservatism) influence in the administration. But who knows. Point is, Levin was right.

  • Nice, couldn't have said it better myself!

  • Look a levin's web site and comments section. Lamo. Hes bad with no followes

  • I heard you on Michael Savage's show :)

  • I thought Mark Levin loved Glenn Beck. Even defended Beck when Beck spoke for Tea Party. Guess Beck left the resveration.

  • Isn't it great when the rightwing cuckoos argue who is the bigger Nazi?

  • @michaeltenenbaum1

    Nazi = National Socialist German Worker's Party - yes, SOCIALIST. ;) This is probably why liberals hate free speech, they have so much in common with Nazis.

  • i like how ML tells it like it is! He is a conservative George Carville. GB is another that is a lot more moderated than ML but also calls it like it is with a different way of explaining the issues.

  • Mark Levin sucks! his show sucks! he doesnt have the voice for radio he sound like Michael Jackon on high does of testosterone

  • Wow nicely put together!

  • slow down

  • Jeezuz fella. When you edit your monologues, leave in a pause at some point will you? Soulds like one long run-on senstence. Impossible to listen to. Also, lower the timbre of your voice so you don't sound so shrill. Yikes.

  • dron paul, dron paul, dron paul.. that's what it's starts to sound like he's says that name so much...

  • Man I just can't think of any words bad enough to express my disdain for that little zionist weasel. The word "traitor" doesn't carry the same weight as it once did, but that's what he or anyone else that puts a foreign country before their own is.

  • I wonder if there's anybody who likes Levin. BTW Great video. So spot on. This truly explains why Levin has such a hard on for Ron Paul

  • I wonder if there's anybody who likes Levin

  • I wonder if there's ANYBODY Levin likes.

  • Mark Levin only supports Hannity and Rush because those guys helped him get into radio.

  • @EricLynchSucks and what makes you so sure of that----FYI----he does not need their help-----plus they are all friends

  • @joebloehe Well fine then theyre all friends...don't think one of them wouldn't stab the other one in the back for a million dollars though.

  • When neocons can't get along, it's funny as hell.

  • really good analysis

  • WTF? Is this a campaign speech for Paul?

  • What you NEO cons don't get is the difference between Isolationism and Interventionsim. With you it's all or nothing. We either have to be all up in our neighbors business, or we are an isolationist. Say there are 3 store owning neighbors A,B, and C. (You are C) A & B get into a fight. You stay out of it,but still sell your goods to both. You don't sell weapons to either. This has worked for us with few exceptions, and was our policy till Wilson and NEO cons like Levin. Let's learn from history!

  • I agree a lot with Mark Levin, but he is a total NEO Con. He can't wait to stir shit with Iran. Of course he won't be the one having to go there. No this Chicken Hawk and all his NEO Commie buds want you to send your kids their to save Israel. Israel can handle Iran all buy itself. We armed them to the teeth. Let's ditch the UN, stop all foreign aid,reduce the size of government, and bring our troops home so they can protect our borders. Think about all the construction jobs that will be created

  • @JTM45100

    Hey dude, remember that the majority of Democrats in congress were for the Iraq War after 9/11 - now they just want to blame it all on Bush and Cheney, while ignoring the fact that Obama and Clinton also sent troops abroad.

  • Beck never blamed America for 9/11, in any way. Beck was speaking mostly regarding the economy and domestic policy and the image of America, in that McCain would have been just as much a problem to America's foundation & strength as Obama.

    And trust me, there would still be a Tea Party and heated town hall meetings if McCain were President, because niether of them are about Republican vs. Democrat. That's what Liberals don't want to acknowledge.

  • "Nor do I believe the Republican Party is going to start seriously listening to Paul in the future"

    Failed prediction, Successful outcome!

  • give Glenn Beck some credit. He keeps an open mind and refuses to blindly embrace any party unquestioningly. Unlike Levin, he doesn't pretend to be an expert who knows everything and seems to aim to learn more about real issues rather than what the establishment feeds us.

    For those reasons, I think it's a shame his show on Fox got cancelled instead of Republican mouthpiece Sean Hannity.

  • @Seedofwinter The difference is that Oklahoma was NEVER China's land. Israelites made their home in their present territory thousands of years ago and were driven away during diaspora. It was always their land and they took it back what was rightfully theirs to begin with.

    There is already a Pally state. It's called Jordan.

  • @KUTVgroucho Let me rephrase this a different way. What if China and the EU carved out a state out of Oklahoma for the Native Americans RIGHT now. This land was found 10's of thousands of years ago by the Native Americans. Do they have that right?

    No they don't because we are here NOW. If you play this game that says I want to go through history and claim things that were once mine, you would have EVERYBODY claiming all kinds of different lands.

    Israel has no right to that land. Case closed

  • @Seedofwinter "Israel has no right to that land." Spoken like a true anti-Israeli Jew hating schmuck. I guess you think the Holocaust never happened, too, just like that smelly midget who runs Iran. Hamas or Hezbollah would love to conscript you for service. I'll bet you scoffed at the 9/11 anniversary commemoration at Ground Zero as well.

  • @KUTVgroucho Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is NOT the ruler of Iran, and his power is very minimal, as are all Presidents in Iran. The Supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, is the human with the power.

    Wtf did you expect? Take people's land and they will fight you and hate you.Kill scores of civilians, as Israel did in the 2009=2009 war, those people WILL hate you. Break the ceasefire that you negotiate with Hamas, and they WILL retaliate back.

    You are a victim of Corporate media, pushing propaganda.

  • @Seedofwinter Right, just conveniently forget the persecution of Jews for 3000 years and all you can think about is a couple of Arabs dying in retaliation for their decades long attacks on Israel. How many Israeli civilians have died? No, you don't cite that, because again, you are an anti-Israeli Jew hater.

    " and his power is very minimal" Bullshit.

  • @KUTVgroucho Israel didn't invade the west bank because of any casualty because NOBODY was killed during the 2008-2009 conflict. Within the war? 10 Israeli soldiers died and only 3 civilians.

    And let's not forget WHY Hamas was launching rockets into Israel: Israel violated the ceasefire by bombing Gaza ,for no reason other than to say weapon smuggling

    During the Gaza war, Israel's response was out of proportion, to nonfatal Hamas rockets

    Ahmadinejad's power is nonexistent; that's a fact.

  • Comment removed

  • @KUTVgroucho You are so brainwashed by the neocons that you can't see straight. I bet you can't even sleep at night without Levin and Krystol telling you bedtime stories of how America and Israel will rule the earth. You know who are the real suicide bombers? The Marxists. Check out Robert Pape's video "Dying To Win" - it will open your eyes.

  • @tanksbb I was behind Israel's right to exist long before I ever heard of Kristol or Levin

  • @KUTVgroucho And another thing, I don't support religion of ANY stripe or color; as far as I'm concerned they are all destructive and they all give humans a doctor's note to be irrational and make lazy decisions. I wish we didn't have Islam or Christianity or Catholicism because none of these religions really promote peace, but rather divide humanity into camps.

    I don't side with Israel because I don't agree with their methods to get peace. I think they impede more than they achieve.

  • @Seedofwinter No, what you DO support is egalitarianism, which doesn't label any culture, belief, or philosophy as either superior or inferior. All exist on the same moral plane.

  • @KUTVgroucho Can't say that that is true. I do label cultures, as you just seen me do. I think all the religions that claim I'm doomed if I don't convert, or pushes certain inane rules unto other humans, or proclaim unnatural and impossible stories as true, is destructive. And coincidentally, that intersects with the world's major religions

    I am in complete accord with philosophy, having read a lot of the major works. From Socrates and Aristotle, to Decartes and, my favorite philosopher, Kant.

  • @Seedofwinter I will contend that Western culture is superior in that it promotes freedom, liberty, and individual rights. Islam does not. I will contend that Judeo-Christian sects are superior to Islam, which is still living in the Middle Ages with a Crusades type mentality of jihad. I can say this without scapegoating and exterminating those who represent inferior cultures, unlike Nazi Germany with Jews. Humans are hardwired to need protector god-like figures, be they mythical or real.

  • @KUTVgroucho And why would they? If China came into the U.S and carved a state out of Oklahoma, I doubt that Oklahoma's natives would be very respectful. They would fight it tooth and nail, and I'm sure you would fight tooth and nail if another Country carved a State out of your land as well.

    The problem with people like you is that you are unable to put yourself in other people's shoes under other people's circumstances. Give the Palestinians a State, and we will be on a path towards peace

  • @KUTVgroucho LOL You Conservatives are all the same. You start balking at me, calling my typos a scar on the English language, but when you do them, they are just typos. You are a joke that is funny, but not really funny if it wasn't so sad.

    Now, you are calling me anti-Semitic, another word that you don't truly understand if you have extracted it from anything I have said hitherto.

    Not knowing what Fascism means is one thing, but not knowing what an anti-Semite is is unbridgeable

    Later

  • @Seedofwinter The acknowledge the dark past of Italy, Egypt, Japan, Russia, and every other powerful nation/state of the last 3000 years. "as acknowledging it's dark past," You're 22 and rather illiterate, plus, you're simply the sum of what's been fed you in university, no doubt, by leftist loser professors. Look up the definition of fascism-radical Islam falls right in line. "a radical, authoritarian (sub-denomination)

    mobilizing through indoctrination (sharia law) and purging enemies (Jews)

  • @KUTVgroucho Funny that you're calling me illiterate. Within your very paragraph you type "you're simply the sum of what's been fed you" LOL It's actually "you're simply the sum of what's been fed TO you.

    Their is NO Fascist Islamic state, for you to say as much shows that you DO NOT know what Fascism is. Iran is a THEOCRACY.

    Stop pointing to other Countries to justify ugly behavior. It's cowardly and a cop out. As a 40 year old, you sound like a 5 year old.

  • @KUTVgroucho And look at the other blatant, illiterate mistake you made "The acknowledge the dark past...."

    Gosh you Conservatives are clowns.

    I follow the philosophy of professor Albert Bartlett, which is a simple physics professor that teaches arithmetic we should all know by now, but don't. YOUR way of running an economy is going to collapse us eventually. Steady growth is unsustainable

    Type his name into the Youtube search engine and watch the 8 part series, and PLEASE watch his lecture

  • Look at how these neocons don't care that our interventionist foreign policy has helped bankrupt our economy and made us the most hated nation on earth.

  • @tanksbb Hey stupido, if America doesn't someone else will and in turn, attack us. You don't understand how humans act or think, do you? You've obviously got some naive mindset that if you put your hand out to a snarling dog in friendship, it won't bite you. You kill snarling dogs, you can't rehabilitate them or change their behavior, which is why it's fruitless to make amends with Islamofascist creeps.

  • @KUTVgroucho How about we just stay away from the snarling dog in their yard, but just have a bigger tougher dog in our yard? Screw being their friend. A bully attacks the weak, not someone who can wipe them out in an afternoon. I do agree with you is that you can't rehabillitate or change them. That's why I would have gone in and got out of Afganistan. Why should we have our boys still over there getting shot at while trying to build schools? Just fuck em up and leave.

  • @tanksbb It's better to be feared than to be loved.

  • Mark Levin is a neocon of the highest order. A little Strauss worshiping Madman, running around stirring up trouble all over the globe so his friends in the "war for profit" department can go on getting richer at our expense. Only a closed minded Neanderthal would support him. He, along with his statist liberal friends on the left should be booted from this country.

  • @tanksbb Please tell us how Levin is actually "running around stirring up trouble all over the globe ..." Like I've said before, if democracy doesn't control these second and third world nations, some totalitarian quasi-communist thuggery will.

  • @KUTVgroucho I don't care to democratize these despotic countries. If we disagree with the way they treat their people, then don't trade with them until they change. Other than than that we should maintain the strongest military detterent in the world for defensive purposes. We can do that and close a lot of unessecary bases around the world, treat our vets better by not risking their lives irrationally and paying them their earned benefits, and get out of debt.

  • @JTM45100 Sorry, I can't think like a libertarian. But I wish I had the amp stack indicated in your screen name!

  • @KUTVgroucho HAHA.. They're amazing amps. I built a replica of the one Hendrix used at the Montery Pop festival. One of my favorite amps.

  • @KUTVgroucho I don't care to democratize these despotic countries. If we disagree with the way they treat their people, then don't trade with them until they change. Other than than that we should maintain the strongest military detterent in the world for defensive purposes. We can do that and close a lot of unessecary bases around the world, treat our vets better by not risking their lives irrationally and paying them their earned benefits, and get out of debt.

  • i have to agree with levin on this. I despise John McCain but he would have done much less damage than obama.

  • i hate beck and i hate levin. levin is a self hating jew

  • If the USA doesn't speared democracy around the world then a vacuum is created and guess who fills it? Totalitarian thugs who oppress and enslave their people. It's one or the other, who do you think is better qualified? This is what Ron Paul doesn't get, American exceptionalism. Neocons are the only ones who believe Israel is worth defending in the ME. Isolationist libertarians and most liberals wouldn't care if it was attacked by Jew hating Islamofascists from Hamas Hezbollah, or the PA.

  • Ron Paul does not care if Iran gets nuclear weapons. Iran would give them to terrorists to use in America and Israel. He thinks we should not have gone into Iraq and Afghanistan. He claims to be a strict constitutionalist but ignores the first and most important job of the U.S. government - protect it's citizens. It is stated in the Constitution. He should reread the Constitution. If he is president, America's enemies would think the U.S. is week because we would not fight back.

  • @43m1garand Ron Paul is completely out of touch with the realities of the world. Besides protecting citizens, we must protect our vital foreign interests, as well.

  • @KUTVgroucho And what are those vital interests you think we should be protecting?

    What folks like you and BigBoss don't get is that you can't run around doing whatever you want. That's the reason why so many people are taking up arms against America, and why the Middle Eastern Countries can't STAND Republicans. You have this attitude that says since you are apart of the strongest Country, you can boss other peoples and countries, and built them in your image. It's ignorant and won't work

    .

  • @Seedofwinter I already explained my reasoning a day ago regarding the appropriateness of American exceptionalism. "It is better to be feared than to be loved." Niccolo Machiavelli "You want a friend, get a dog." Harry S. Truman. By the way, the Saudi Arabia loved Republicans and George Bush because they did good business together. Israel loves the GOP because both are on the same page regarding Islamofascist thugs. Only the Pally loving Middle East hates the GOP and loves Barry Hussein Obama.

  • @KUTVgroucho A quote from a US President and Machiavelli--a cynical and dark heart-- hardly persuades me. Fact is, Truman left office with a 20% approval rating, and isn't very well liked, even today. It is NEVER better to be feared, rather than loved. Love unites while hate divides and destabilizes

    You talk minority Saudi and Jewish leadership, I'm talking the collective people's of the middle East and the world. Even our comrades in Canada and the UK disdain the GOP, you can't disregard that

  • @Seedofwinter I don't care if I "persuade" you to believe my historical viewpoint. I'm a nationalist conservative and you're a collectivist lib. We're not going to agree on any interpretation of history.

  • @KUTVgroucho History doesn't have contradictory meanings. You treated blacks like crap, and now they have deep distrust of whites; you disregarded the will of the Iranian people, gave em a dictator, and now not only do they hate us, but the entire middle east hates us

    All people progress, leave em to progress on their own and they will. If you bud in you impede progress, because than the State has an "enemy" and an "enemy" diverts attention from the tyrannical and unfair acts of the government

  • @Seedofwinter "You treated blacks like crap," CORRECTION  I have never treated a black person "like crap."

    "If you bud in" It's "butt in," actually. Perhaps less obsession over politics and more on proper speech/spelling might be in order for you. Proper speech is a more marketable skill. No one cares about your politics in the job market.

  • @KUTVgroucho Fair point, I phrased that the wrong way. I should have said "White folks have treated blacks like crap" in lieu of what I said.

    Their are actually lots of jobs that deal with politics in the job market, and from what I hear, the pay ain't half bad.

    I had no idea that saying "bud in" in place of "butt in" would somehow cost me a job. Thanks for giving me that heads up! If only you vetted President Bush with the same standards as you have just done my typo

    LOL Good day, friend

  • @Seedofwinter You need to rephrase once more ... SOME white folks have treated blacks like crap, just as SOME black folks have treated their own like crap. It's not the white man's fault that SOME black men can't be responsible enough to father children AND raise them. What's the stat on single mother households among blacks? It's a staggeringly high percentage.

    I did vet GWB rather well. I knew he despised Islamofascist scum as much as I did and still do.

  • @KUTVgroucho Nope, I phrased it exactly correct. The vast majority of Colonial Americans supported enslaving their brother humans of a different color, by a pretty steep margin. Washington didn't want blacks fighting in our Army because he thought them inferior. And 70 years ago blacks weren't allowed to fight with white units.

    Their is no Islamic Country that is Fascist

    We are not talking about single, black households

    GWB didn't know how to pronounce "nuclear"

  • @Seedofwinter Guess what, "enslaving brother humans" predates colonial America by thousands of years, but you don't cite that. You just want to bash America.

    There are Islamic organizations, that heavily influence the way their host countries/territories are run, that are fascist. Hezbollah in Lebanon. The Palestinian Authority on the West Bank. Hamas in Gaza and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

    At least GWB doesn't say "axe" for "ask," or drop consonants off the end of words.

  • @KUTVgroucho It's not bashing America as much as acknowledging it's dark past, and how it's past decisions have hurt black people, and how that hurt manifests itself black culture.

    Yes slavery has always existed, but no Country has ever had a bond with slavery as America has, to the point that 600k Americans had to die to purge it. Our Constitution declared all black 3/5ths a person.

    With all due respect, you don't understand Fascism if you think Hezbollah or the Muslim brotherhood is Fascist

  • Don't let the truth get in the way of you telling a story. You didn't mention that Ron Paul wants to legalize drugs. Anyone who thinks legalizing drugs will solve anything is ignorant of facts. Heroin, marijuana, cocaine, LSD, methamphetamine, and other drugs in small amounts are legal in Mexico since 2009. These were legalized to try to help with the drug cartels problems. This has been an obvious failure. People still make alcohol illegally. People still make moonshine.

  • You don't mention the fact Teddy Roosevelt started the Bull Moose Party which was a Progressive party. You don't tell why Beck said McCain would be worse than Obama. Beck said this because if McCain won we would keep spending and growing the govenment slowly like we did under Bush and other presidents. With Obama everybody can see what socialism does when done quickly and in a large amount. Beck talked about Progressives before Obama even got the Democrat presidential nomination.

  • Mark Levin says Ron Paul supporters including Southern Avenger are the biggest assholes. Levin does not hate Beck. I listen to both. Levin likes what Beck says about Israel. Your video has more lies. The Tea Party was not started by Ron Paul and was started when Bush was in office. Your claim that Conservatives would not talk about all the issuses you state if McCain won is a lie. They have talked about those issues and will continue no matter who is president.

  • Southern Avenger you saw what many are just finally realizing now. That true conservative forien policy is that of Ron Paul. I can see why FOX let Beck go. He wasn't towing the lin, and I actually respect him for striving to learn and changing his views if he finds he was wrong on an issue. Peemptive war is neocon/Wilsonian.

  • @JTM45100 Fuck Ru Paul and if you think his foreign policy is true conservative foreign-policy your very ignorant of history. George Washington authorized an attack across the American border in 1775. Adams conducted the Quasi-War against France, authorized by Congress in 1798. Jefferson sent Marines to Tripoli to fight the Barbary pirates. Madison, father of the Constitution, invaded Canada. Monroe drew a line around, literally, half the planet and declared it an American protectorate.

  • @bigboss686 We were at war with the British, we were attacked by the Barbary pirates. There's a difference between defense, and the Wilsonian interventionist doctrine that sucked us into WW2 and Iraq.. Ron Paul was for Afganistan, but not in Iraq. I don't want to change the world. Let's worry about ourselves while armed to the the teeth as a deterrent. True conservative policy to the founders is to be a friend to all, and ally to none. Becoming an ally gets you their enemies too.

  • @JTM45100 What do the British had to do with the military engagements I mentioned? You're so ignorant of history you think the only military action the US had in its first century was against the British an Pirates LOL. FACT, no declaration of war declared to authorized attacks by two founding fathers across the Canadian border or against the Barbary Pirates. Ron Paul is an ingrate. As are you for insinuating we should not have entered WWII. BTW, no allies equals surrounded, great strategy, NOT

  • @bigboss686 1) If you read a book instead of parroting talking points you'd know 1775 was part of the Revolutionary War. 2)The French attacked us for the Jay treaty and not paying our debts. They siezed hundreds of our merchant ships for trading with the British. 3) We attacked Barbary Pirates who were attacking us. Can't you tell the difference between that and invading Kuwait, Iraq, or even Iran? Neither is attacking us. Get it? Stop being a sheep! No Allies = Not inheriting their enemies

  • @JTM45100 Typical Ru Paul drone.1 we were at war the British, Washington authorizer attack across the CANADIAN border. 2 illustrates why RP isolationism doesn't work, i.e. trade with the British get attacked by the French. So much for minding your own business keeping you out of conflict. 3 same as 2, and disproves your inheriting enemies nonsense. BTW according to RuPaul those instances mean Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison and Monroe were neocon's, ridiculous? Not by Ru Paul logic. 

  • @bigboss686 Glad you agree on point 1. Yes we were at war with the British, so you whole interventionist point is blown out of the water 2) Shows how you don't understand RP or Isolationism. RP doesn't promote isolationsim, he is against NEO Con/ Wilsonian/ Progressive Global interventionism. Up until WW1 it was our policy. Is it perfect? No. We got dragged into the Quasi War by trading, but I say we still openly trade non militarily. On the other hand we should not have done lend lease.

  • @JTM45100 If being at war with the British justifies violating Canadian sovereignty, as you clearly have reaffirmed that it does, then Iraq is completely justified. After all, were at war with Al Qaeda and Al Qaeda (Abu Musab al-Zarqawi) was in Iraq prior to 9/11. Oh, an before you go off on a childish rant I'm not saying they co-conspired on 9/11, but according to you war with the British justifies violating Canadian sovereignty war with Qaeda justifies Iraq. Sorry Ru Paul drone you lose again

  • @JTM45100 Let me ask you a simple question; Why doesn't Ron Paul want to protect our Southern border? Why does he not see a problem with a nuclear Iran? Why does he want to trade with Cuba? I like so much of what he says, but these issues trouble me

  • @Teapartyla Why does he want a nuclear Iran? I never once heard RP say " I want Iran to acquire nuclear weapons". Did you? He fully explains his position. If you cannot understand it you may be absent of the gene which allows critical thinking. Why does he wanna trade w/ cuba? Ummm why the fuck not? You honestly believe he does not want to protect the southern border? Really?

  • @Teapartyla he wan't to bring the troops home and send them to the border to defend it. He does see a problem with Iran, but also realizes that short of going into a war with them because nothing has worked. sanctions don't work because too much of the world won't impose them on Iran. what were left with is looking for a new strategy. I'm not sure why trade with Cuba is bad? theirs already black market trade with them, why not get some tax dollars off the imports that come here.

  • Comment removed

  • Levin;s schtick is wearing thin and I liken him to a sinking ship

  • When will you folks get that this Far right lunatic Levin is just as bad as an Olbermann. He is all hyperbole.

    So is Levin honestly going to tell me we need a 700 billion dollar military budget and that their is NO waste there? Bullshit.

    And than he calls President Obama a Marxist.... How is President Obama a Marxist? Because he wants the richer to pay more taxes and he apologizes for Bush's disastrous decisions. You extreme Republicans embarrass this great nation.

  • @Seedofwinter I suggest you learn a little more about Marxism before you make silly statements like the one you've made here.

    It will help keep you from looking incredibly stupid like you do here in the future

  • @bigboss686 LMAO I remember you. This is Luvaan. I used to clash with you on Youtube a few years back. Still same profile pic, I see. I got a real good memory, brother.

    What in my statement is false? Please, point it out.

    All one must do is read Karl Marx's Communist manifesto to know what a Marxist is. Higher tax rate doesn't equal a Marxist. I suggest you brush up on your reading and give the Communist manifesto a attentive read. Than come back and we can discuss it.

  • @Seedofwinter LOL why bother discussing anything with someone like you who has the intellect of a chimpanzee? Higher taxation is a pillar of Marxism, as is class warfare, degrading borders, assaulting religion, gun control etc. Just one tidbit for you in a plethora of examples americanthinker(.)com/blog/201­1/07/obamas_marxist_immersion_­shows_in_presser(.)html BTW FDR was a fascist piece of SHIT, course maybe you get off on the idea of locking Japanese people in concentration camps like him.

  • @bigboss686 "Higher taxation is a pillar of Marxism" what rubbish. Where did you pull that one from, I wonder. The European nations have been on this path to Communism for such a long time, man. When are they going to morph Already? LOL

    Blame the border situation on the vested interests that profit off of Mexican labor. They flood Washington with Lobbyists and make sure the issue isn't resolved.

    Your other items are so weak, as it equates to Communism, I won't even try to deflect them

  • @bigboss686 If FDR was such a POS, I wonder why he ranks on the top of greatest Presidents in almost all surveys, while most right wing politicians are in the basement. Don't wonder by the way, it was a rhetorical question.

    I just love the way you boiled FDR's character down to the interment issue. I guess I could break down the founding father's in the same way, only using slavery, right? Same flawless logic. LOL

    FDR didn't want to do it, but he bowed to public pressure. He was a politician

  • @Seedofwinter Seriously? your ignorance of history is astounding, FDR's popularity was primarily a link to ending prohibition and a few other circumstantial issues, not the new deal, people hated the new deal mises(.)org/daily/4797 Also the founding fathers did more to end slavery than any other group therightscoop(.)com/levin-bach­mann-is-right-and-stephanopolo­us-is-foolish/ BTW bowing to public pressure equals FDR saying, civil rights are up for a popular vote. Oh what "integrity" LOL

  • @bigboss686 LOL So you believe FDR won reelection 4 times because he reinstated alcohol? Wow, this is worse than I thought. History disagrees with vehemently.

    1932 and 1936 was based purely on Economic relief, that's the facts. 1940 and 1945 were due to his leadership during the war.

    Founding father embedded slavery in our constitution and slaughtered Indians by the thousands.

    The people loved the new deal, it was the powerful interests that hated it. LOL

    On alcohol? LMAO

  • @Seedofwinter Left-wing ideologues disagree, history shows I'm right. fee(.)org/nff/three-myths-of-t­he-great-depression/ Also, your claim on slavery an the Constitution" is fraudulent. Constitution put a specific date on importation of slaves to become ILLEGAL. the previous link I provided clearly shows you have no leg to stand on in that regard.

    BTW if a high progressive income tax isn't a pillar of Marxism why's it number 2 in the 10 pillars of Marxism? oh that's right, because you= not smart

  • @bigboss686 Their is specific clause in the Constitution titled the "3/5ths clause", it counts every black man as 3/5ths a man. Now, although it wasn't intentionally put in the Constitution to endorse slavery, but rather to limit southern representation of Congress, the compromise gave the South all the ammo they needed to say that Slaves weren't "men" but were 3/5ths of a man. Civil war destiny at that point

    Why you think Lincoln never used to Constitution to prove his case? Because the Cons

  • @Seedofwinter LMAO you do realize that you have refuted yourself and prove me right in your own post, right? the compromise was the mechanism with which to end it through the democratic process. BTW Lincoln used the Constitution as a pillar of his case for ending slavery, Just as the use the Declaration of Independence. He knew that to interpret the Constitution. You must do it through the prism of the declaration. spu(.)edu/info/Constitution-Da­y-08(.)asp Your ignorance is ASTOUNDING

  • @bigboss686 Lincoln used to Declaration of independence to prove his case against slavery, not the Constitution. Read about it, sometime.

    The 3/5ths clause was used by the CONFEDERACY to prove THEIR case FOR slavery. In counted all blacks as 3/5ths of a person, and thus, every slave wasn't a full human. This is why the Republicans wanted to stop it's spread to the west, because if they did, they knew that slavery would be suffocated, and they knew that it was protected by the Constitution.

  • @Seedofwinter Incorrect, Lincoln used the declaration to quantify the meaning of all men are created equal, which appears in the Constitution, he did not separate the two he used them in conjunction. Without the 3/5ths Confederate states had overwhelming representation and thus slavery would have never gone away, your take on the compromise is shallow, at best. BTW Republicans were the party of civil rights, as reflected by the voting records on all civil rights legislation. Dixiecrat is a myth