Division Required - Lindsay Tanner - Member for Melbourne

[MrSpeaker1995]

Lol " the member for Melbourne will withdraw that remark". "Well that's ok for you to say!"

[pauliejay]

Julie Bishop. Always good enough to be deputy to a succession of clowns, never good enough to be leader.

[waseem2zizz]

hi im 11 i dnt no wat happned please explain

[raff23]

julie bishop representing the schools of australia, think about it people little miss rich girl who thought she knew what was best for ordinary australians, pfft what a laugh.

[Idolsofwood]

"Or I'll deal with him..."

Tool statement right there.

[jampt1989]

Lindsay Tanner should be treasurer

[fantasticini]

Tanner will be Treasurer now Swanny has himself in a world of trouble.

[pickledpork]

Under what standing order??

[jeremytravers1]

S.O. 92, which says that the Speaker can intervene if a Member's conduct is considered disorderly.

[Clone3037]

@pickledpork under standing order 94

[Keatinglengend]

I think that David Hawker (speaker0 is not very fair with the member for melbourne.

[pickledpork]

What did the disorderly member for Melbourne say? Was it unparliamantary?

[belisarius76]

Bye bye to the tories rofl

[MassiveJungle]

tories burn in hell

[timcmaeder]

roflmao watching kev fucking up australia who needs tv with commedy this good

[timcmaeder]

hello to the goons

[altube1001]

Suck it up bitch!

[volantare]

Did you notice how the guy turning the timer started reaching out even before the second "nay" came?

[travo1980]

That was the Deputy Clerk and he only did so that the division could be timed correctly under the standing orders.

[volantare]

I understand WHY he did it, it's just his pre-emption would suggest that division always occurs. I suppose that's the typical tat-for-tat of Australian politics.

[daveyork0]

He said she was the lousiest lay he'd ever had.

[PhantomRandom]

what did the member of melbourne say?