GOD tahala hich kari bare hichki nakarde, harvaght ma yad gereftim ke KHODEOM bayad dast be daste ham bedim va ayandaro besazim onmoghe shayad iranemon behtar az emruz beshe, 1400 sale khodaro avordan to keshvaremon nadidi mage be che gohi keshidan keshvaro..
این امام حسین اینقدر الاغ بوده که حاضر بوده زن وبچه هاش و عباس از تشنگی بمیرند ولی شب عاشورا آب داشت که همگی غسل شهادت کنند و واجبی بکشند .واقعا که دست شمر درد نکنه که سر این بابا رو مثل گاو برید
من شخصا شاشیدم تو دهن حسین تشنه لب تا رفع تشنگیش بشه.کیرم تو کس ابجی جنده حسن یعنی زینب کس قلنبه و سایر ماده های فامیل حسین. میگن علی اکبر هم کون بدی نداشته ولی حیف که حالا فاسد شده
Khafe shin baba , ahmaghaye bishor , albate ba oonam ke be ostad tohin mikonan , akhe ridam too mghzetoon , shoma chi haliton mishe , kiram to tamame eteghadatetoon
خوب!مگر حضرت مسیح(ع)هم گناهان همه ی بشریت راقبول نکرد و به شهادت نرسید؟شماکه ایشانرا قبول داری،پس ممکن هم هست سایر مقدسین هم به امر خداوندقبول شهادت کرده باشند.و اصلا در تاریخ کم نبوده اند دلاورانیکه خود را فدای امر بزرگتری کرده اند. چطور حضرت عیسی (ع)را چون فرنگی ست احترام میگذاری که واجب هم هست ولی معتقدات ایرانیان را حمله میکنی؟چرا ایرانی مسلمان را از
یهودی و بودایی ومسیحی کمتر میدانی که توهین فرهنگی است و جای بحت ندارد.لطفا سانسور نکنید.
عیسی مسیح(ع)وجودنداشته؟ پس چطور خود همین مشیری میگویدکه اوبدون شمشیروتنهابادوازده حواریون خود دین مسیحی را جهانگیر کرده؟آدمی که وجود خارجی نداشته که شمشیردار و بی شمشیر بودنش مفهومی ندارد.این همه مغلطه فقط برای اهانت به فرهنگ ایران که اسلام هم بخش مهمی از آنست درست نیست.مثل آن میماند که بگوییم نادرشاه هم چشم پسرش را کور نکرده و کور کردن مخالفین فقط کار حکام مسلمان است.نمیشود که بزور همه بدیها از دنیای اسلام باشد و خوبیهاازسایر ادیان و تمدنها.
vali ba hameye in harfha dalayele ketab kamelan manteghie va neshoon mide emam mikhaste koofaro begire na inke be amre khoda bekhad shahid beshe. nemidoonam age shoma dalil ya sanad tarikhi dari ke mitooni khalafe in ro sabet koni begoo.
in che jangist ke rah andakhte id aleih eslam? hameye harf moshiri inast ke sabet konad agar iran aghab mande ast, taghsire eslam va arabhaye sosmarkhor ast. pas vaghtike oropaye masihi az doniaye eslam aghabtar bod, anha ham bayad bejay talash baraye pishraft hey faghan va fohsh sar midadand ke hame chiz taghsire din e masihi ast ke az felestin kam kam oropa ra gerefte, albateh ba shamshire Emperatori Rom. agar hame chiz enghadr sade bod ke zahmati nadasht va dorost mishod.
6)Salehi was also trying to argue against what he refers to as "Ghullaat tendencies" amongst some of the Ulama(the belief that the Imam has to know everything in the past present and future) he argues that the Prophet and Imams, even though they were endowed with divinely given knowledge, were not aware of every minute detail of what happens in the world.
7)Moshiri's claim that during the days of the Safavi dynasty the belief in the 12th Imam arose is utter BS. The shias have been awaiting..
..the rise of the 12th Imam since his father's death in the 9th century. Bullshit Moshiri needs to learn his facts before he attempts to sound intelligent.
8) Over all Salehi's work was a work of a mujtahid's analysis of the rise of Imam Husayn. His analysis may or may not be accurate. Hence, due to its ijtihadi nature, another mujtahid is not obligated to accept everything that Salehi has written as gospel truth heck neither are we. Infact he was responded to a few times and he responded back
..but, as far as i know no one really paid any more attention to his responses hence they MIGHT be left unresponded.
9)Moshiri goes on about hadiths vs history. This is a clear example of his misunderstanding of the usage of sources by Salehi. Where do you think those sources got their information from? Those are all Akhbaar-i-Taarikhi in the form of a hadith (i.e. They have an isnaad (chain of narration) and a matn (text) as do all other Musnad (hadiths with a chain of narration going..
why would the savak, a secular intelligence agency, really care about the history of Imam Husayn when it does not effect them? because they knew that Salehi's message was relevant to the situation in iran: the muslims rising up against a tyrant (here being the Shah regardless of how you feel about him, the man was a prick)
11) Moshiri claims that only the family of Imam Husayn remained. This is false many of his supporters remained as well as some who deserted Yazid's army to join Husayn.
Obviously those who joined Imam Husayn knew that they would probably become killed seeing the size of Yazid's army vs the small camp of Husayni followers. They must have joined for another reason: because in their hearts they felt that the truth was with Imam Husayn. they UNDERSTOOD the message of Imam Husayn's rising: That he is willing to die rather than have to live in humiliation under a tyrant's rule.
ok this is the end of my analysis. Im sure no one will read it lol khodahafz besalamati
cock of every Arab camel into the mouth of all the 12 pontificate and their ancestry, thus the cock of my neighbour's dog into the bitchy ass of fatemeye zahra
kire har chi shotore arab, too dahane 12 emamo ilo tabareshoon. kire sage hamsayamoon ham too koone fatemeye zahra ye jendeh.
Bahram Moshiri is an idiot. First off he totally twists what Marhoom Salehi Najafabadi was trying to accomplish in Shaheed Javeed:
1)Salehi was trying to explain the revolution of Imam Husayn in the light of the circumstances of the Imams time and not based on any preknowledge of the exact details of the battle of Karbala.
2)Salehi never denied that the Imam knew that one day he is to become martyred. He just argues for what, in his opinion, are evidences that the Imam might have not known..
in detail all the details of his martyrdom. (this was, according to Salehi, the opinion of Sharif Murtadha, Shaykh Mufid and Shaykh Tusi (3 of the highest ranking scholars of early Shia islam)
3) in NO way was Salehi trying to downplay the martyrdom of Imam Husayn, he was trying to explain it in a way so that people can learn from the lessons that Imam Husayn has left for us. In fact he was trying to defend the Imam against accusations made by the enemies of the Shia.
4)This book was revolutionary for its time mainly because 1)it questioned what many were saying on the minbars 2)the author was supportive of Khomeini's protests against the Shah. 3)the Savak, meddled in these affairs to further the divide between the Ulama and the Khomeini/Montazeri camp.
5)over all Salehi was trying to explain that Imam Husayn's revolution is a lesson for all Muslims and that the Imam had to rise up and fight injustice. This is the meaning of the whole event of Karbala.
Lanat bar Mohammad va ale Mohammad
Lucki9200 5 months ago
من هم شاشيدم به اين دين و بخصوص لب تشنه حسين
kohzad1000 10 months ago 2
شاشیدم بر اسلام و قرآن و علی و محمد و حسن و حسین عمر و عثمان و فاطی کس پاره و زینب شاشو وبقیه ی بر و بچه های اسلام
kasra20giv1 1 year ago
@kasra20giv1 دمت گرم
albundy0007 1 year ago
لعنت بر حسین زن باز، علی سگ کش و محمد دختر جنده. کیر یزدگرد تو کس دختر عمر و علی.
xosrov2 2 years ago 5
lanat bar in hossein ke har chi mikeshim az oone va jaddo abade koskesheshe
martinjeferson 2 years ago 4
beshmar
xosrov2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is any good thing can be result of moshiri?
he just make critic just from his view - all the world are wrong= shahnshahi dictator.
revolution removes this kind of assholes from iran
thanks god.
mooshi = loompan shahanshahi
Fairman222 2 years ago
lanat bar ein sheytan !!!!!!!!
lvlohmad 2 years ago
GOD will make the GREAT PERSIA again
parsajavid 3 years ago 3
GOD tahala hich kari bare hichki nakarde, harvaght ma yad gereftim ke KHODEOM bayad dast be daste ham bedim va ayandaro besazim onmoghe shayad iranemon behtar az emruz beshe, 1400 sale khodaro avordan to keshvaremon nadidi mage be che gohi keshidan keshvaro..
Zendebaaaad Irane Azade BEDOONE ESLAM
Mangekyou78 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
mushiri asshole has no legitimicy call himself OSTAD- he is telling shahanshahi bullsheets - we heard these in last 80 yrs
مشیری د یوس به تو چه و تادیروز باپهلو ی در عراق تو صدام را سا ک می زدی امروز حق حر ف´زدن د ر موردایران نداری - خودفرو ش حرامزاده و
یا و ه گو
Fairman222 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
این امام حسین اینقدر الاغ بوده که حاضر بوده زن وبچه هاش و عباس از تشنگی بمیرند ولی شب عاشورا آب داشت که همگی غسل شهادت کنند و واجبی بکشند .واقعا که دست شمر درد نکنه که سر این بابا رو مثل گاو برید
toshiba299 3 years ago 6
من شخصا شاشیدم تو دهن حسین تشنه لب تا رفع تشنگیش بشه.کیرم تو کس ابجی جنده حسن یعنی زینب کس قلنبه و سایر ماده های فامیل حسین. میگن علی اکبر هم کون بدی نداشته ولی حیف که حالا فاسد شده
albundy0007 3 years ago 5
بعد از شکست کربلا ، تمام لشکر یزید اهل بیت حسن را تا شام هر شب میکردند از جمله زینب کس پاره.
xosrov2 2 years ago 6
@albundy0007
دستور زبان پارسی
من تو او ما شما ایشان همگی میشاشیم بر اسلام و قرآن و محمد وعلی و حسن و حسین
kasra20giv1 1 year ago
hossin john radam to rohat
rockyz288 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ایشان همه را به مغلطه کاری متهم می کند ولی خود از بزرگترین مغلطه کاران است. از آنچه که در کتاب شهید جاوید نوشته شده فقط خود مشیری چنین برداشتی دارد.
meyti1029 3 years ago
Khafe shin baba , ahmaghaye bishor , albate ba oonam ke be ostad tohin mikonan , akhe ridam too mghzetoon , shoma chi haliton mishe , kiram to tamame eteghadatetoon
drug1985 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
بی ادب به عقیده یک ملت نه چند ملیار انسان توهین نکن.
اصلا تو کی هستی که درباره همه چیز نظر می دهی.
aminiranform 3 years ago
او زبان ماست. او زبان بریده آزادیخواهان ایرانی است که امامان تو آن ها را بر دار کردند، کشتند، سر بریدند، به بردگی بردند.
baamedi 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
حسین فریب خورد؟! ای آدم جاهل عقب افتاده، شما ظاهرا مخدرات مصرف می کنی و میای برنامه اجرا می کنی. به ذلت نشستن تو را به خاطر این خضعبلات خواهیم دید.
richardvert 3 years ago
خوب!مگر حضرت مسیح(ع)هم گناهان همه ی بشریت راقبول نکرد و به شهادت نرسید؟شماکه ایشانرا قبول داری،پس ممکن هم هست سایر مقدسین هم به امر خداوندقبول شهادت کرده باشند.و اصلا در تاریخ کم نبوده اند دلاورانیکه خود را فدای امر بزرگتری کرده اند. چطور حضرت عیسی (ع)را چون فرنگی ست احترام میگذاری که واجب هم هست ولی معتقدات ایرانیان را حمله میکنی؟چرا ایرانی مسلمان را از
یهودی و بودایی ومسیحی کمتر میدانی که توهین فرهنگی است و جای بحت ندارد.لطفا سانسور نکنید.
5marca5 3 years ago
eyseh Massieh did not exist.tu ham mesleh akhoon ha maghlateh mekoni.javab dari bogo.
CYRUS2060 3 years ago
عیسی مسیح(ع)وجودنداشته؟ پس چطور خود همین مشیری میگویدکه اوبدون شمشیروتنهابادوازده حواریون خود دین مسیحی را جهانگیر کرده؟آدمی که وجود خارجی نداشته که شمشیردار و بی شمشیر بودنش مفهومی ندارد.این همه مغلطه فقط برای اهانت به فرهنگ ایران که اسلام هم بخش مهمی از آنست درست نیست.مثل آن میماند که بگوییم نادرشاه هم چشم پسرش را کور نکرده و کور کردن مخالفین فقط کار حکام مسلمان است.نمیشود که بزور همه بدیها از دنیای اسلام باشد و خوبیهاازسایر ادیان و تمدنها.
5marca5 3 years ago
vali ba hameye in harfha dalayele ketab kamelan manteghie va neshoon mide emam mikhaste koofaro begire na inke be amre khoda bekhad shahid beshe. nemidoonam age shoma dalil ya sanad tarikhi dari ke mitooni khalafe in ro sabet koni begoo.
eelakh 3 years ago
in che jangist ke rah andakhte id aleih eslam? hameye harf moshiri inast ke sabet konad agar iran aghab mande ast, taghsire eslam va arabhaye sosmarkhor ast. pas vaghtike oropaye masihi az doniaye eslam aghabtar bod, anha ham bayad bejay talash baraye pishraft hey faghan va fohsh sar midadand ke hame chiz taghsire din e masihi ast ke az felestin kam kam oropa ra gerefte, albateh ba shamshire Emperatori Rom. agar hame chiz enghadr sade bod ke zahmati nadasht va dorost mishod.
5marca5 3 years ago
Etefaghan daghighan Europe bekhatere hamin ghazieh pishraft kard ke joloye din va kelisa ro gereftan. Mage shoma az Renaissance khabar nadari?!
eelakh 3 years ago
6)Salehi was also trying to argue against what he refers to as "Ghullaat tendencies" amongst some of the Ulama(the belief that the Imam has to know everything in the past present and future) he argues that the Prophet and Imams, even though they were endowed with divinely given knowledge, were not aware of every minute detail of what happens in the world.
7)Moshiri's claim that during the days of the Safavi dynasty the belief in the 12th Imam arose is utter BS. The shias have been awaiting..
lollercoaster247 4 years ago
..the rise of the 12th Imam since his father's death in the 9th century. Bullshit Moshiri needs to learn his facts before he attempts to sound intelligent.
8) Over all Salehi's work was a work of a mujtahid's analysis of the rise of Imam Husayn. His analysis may or may not be accurate. Hence, due to its ijtihadi nature, another mujtahid is not obligated to accept everything that Salehi has written as gospel truth heck neither are we. Infact he was responded to a few times and he responded back
lollercoaster247 4 years ago
..but, as far as i know no one really paid any more attention to his responses hence they MIGHT be left unresponded.
9)Moshiri goes on about hadiths vs history. This is a clear example of his misunderstanding of the usage of sources by Salehi. Where do you think those sources got their information from? Those are all Akhbaar-i-Taarikhi in the form of a hadith (i.e. They have an isnaad (chain of narration) and a matn (text) as do all other Musnad (hadiths with a chain of narration going..
lollercoaster247 4 years ago
back to the time of the Prophet or Imams... Moshiri really needs to get his facts straight.
10)Montazeri in his Khaterat, actually speaks about the role of the Shah backed Savak and how they caused this whole ordeal to intensify immensely.
lollercoaster247 4 years ago
why would the savak, a secular intelligence agency, really care about the history of Imam Husayn when it does not effect them? because they knew that Salehi's message was relevant to the situation in iran: the muslims rising up against a tyrant (here being the Shah regardless of how you feel about him, the man was a prick)
11) Moshiri claims that only the family of Imam Husayn remained. This is false many of his supporters remained as well as some who deserted Yazid's army to join Husayn.
lollercoaster247 4 years ago
Obviously those who joined Imam Husayn knew that they would probably become killed seeing the size of Yazid's army vs the small camp of Husayni followers. They must have joined for another reason: because in their hearts they felt that the truth was with Imam Husayn. they UNDERSTOOD the message of Imam Husayn's rising: That he is willing to die rather than have to live in humiliation under a tyrant's rule.
ok this is the end of my analysis. Im sure no one will read it lol khodahafz besalamati
lollercoaster247 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
cock of every Arab camel into the mouth of all the 12 pontificate and their ancestry, thus the cock of my neighbour's dog into the bitchy ass of fatemeye zahra
kire har chi shotore arab, too dahane 12 emamo ilo tabareshoon. kire sage hamsayamoon ham too koone fatemeye zahra ye jendeh.
kossmaghz 4 years ago
Bahram Moshiri is an idiot. First off he totally twists what Marhoom Salehi Najafabadi was trying to accomplish in Shaheed Javeed:
1)Salehi was trying to explain the revolution of Imam Husayn in the light of the circumstances of the Imams time and not based on any preknowledge of the exact details of the battle of Karbala.
2)Salehi never denied that the Imam knew that one day he is to become martyred. He just argues for what, in his opinion, are evidences that the Imam might have not known..
lollercoaster247 4 years ago
in detail all the details of his martyrdom. (this was, according to Salehi, the opinion of Sharif Murtadha, Shaykh Mufid and Shaykh Tusi (3 of the highest ranking scholars of early Shia islam)
3) in NO way was Salehi trying to downplay the martyrdom of Imam Husayn, he was trying to explain it in a way so that people can learn from the lessons that Imam Husayn has left for us. In fact he was trying to defend the Imam against accusations made by the enemies of the Shia.
lollercoaster247 4 years ago
4)This book was revolutionary for its time mainly because 1)it questioned what many were saying on the minbars 2)the author was supportive of Khomeini's protests against the Shah. 3)the Savak, meddled in these affairs to further the divide between the Ulama and the Khomeini/Montazeri camp.
5)over all Salehi was trying to explain that Imam Husayn's revolution is a lesson for all Muslims and that the Imam had to rise up and fight injustice. This is the meaning of the whole event of Karbala.
lollercoaster247 4 years ago
Doroud bar Ostadan Fouladvand wa Moshiri.
BehzadHamedani 4 years ago
Afarin bar shoma.
babakbabaki07 4 years ago 4
Ostadeh bozorgvar mamnoon az inkeh haghayegh ra roushan minkonid.
iranipoyandeh 4 years ago 8
Great speaker and leader Bahram Moshiri.
hmt111 4 years ago 8
islam = eating killing fuking. and by the way all the religion are the same.
khoramdin110 4 years ago
Dorood bar Ostad Moshiri
bahmanjazuyeh 4 years ago 4
Besyaar Aali bud wa dorost. Sepaasgozaaram.
houmie 4 years ago 4
mamnun.agha mishe tuzih bedid ke bad az ghabil ke habil ra kosht,chetur nasli az khod beja gozasht. aya ba meymun azdevaj kard.teorie jalebie
Chrisdenfraekke 4 years ago
بسیار زیبا صحیح برسی کردید
taksir01 4 years ago 2