lmfao, it's fucking disgusting how bad this guy was. can't play tennis so pretend to play basketball to get more popular? ROFLMAO!!! mug wouldn't even take a point from nadal on any surface
unfortunately, regardless of who was better between sampras and federer, it is federer who has topped all the great sampras records.
how can people really argue so much about a hypothetical situation that will never, ever be proven? especially if you use even more hypothetical evidence to prove your hypothetical argument?!
Hahaha what an absolute joke of a statement. Sampras's game was too dominant at this time and was literally untouchable. It's arguable that Federer would beat Sampras on clay yes, but certainly not on every other surface; i'd be willing to bet my lifesavings that the pete of 94-98 would destroy Rogers prime years.
No offence, mate, but Pete was too one-dimensional for Federer. I can give it to Pete as far as grass (the fast one from the 90's) is conerned, probably would win 5 out of 10 times with Federer, but other than that, especially clay, no chance.
On the other hand - I don't think Sampras could win much if he played today. The Australian Open courts are way slower, grass is way slower, I'm not talking even about the French. The US Open would be his best shot.
Pete too one-dimensional for Fed? If you want to talk one-dimension Tennis watch the Top 100 today. Sampras's variety was fantastic and to call him a one-dimensional player is u being an ignorant dickhead. You clearly havent seen Sampras play on other surfaces and he i'd say he would beat Fed on every surface except clay (however seeing as Fed grew up on clay this is to be expected). Yeah they changed courts speeds, ball heaviness etc so it could allow the top 100 of today to have a chance..
2)well at least pete looks one-dimensional compared to federer
3)ohh believe me ive seen sampras lots of times in action, he was a pure aggresor thats why i said hed be even with federer on super fast grass, its hard to root for sampras on clay and slow hard courts (like the australian and french opens) cause sampras kept losing before the 4th round to random players several times, federer is in each final almost every time beating young guns like nadal djoker del potro
I could pose the same question to u about Fed placed in the standards & conditions of the 90s.If Fed wud av plyed the same game in the true 'purist' conditions of the 90's v Sampras, Agassi, Kuerten, Brugera, Rafter, Muster, Ivanisevic, Lendl, Becker, Courier (just to name a few) in their best years, would he still have won 14 Grand Slams in 6 years? If you do think so given the types of GS finalists hes had (Murray twice, Gonzo, Bagh, 35yr old Andre, Philli, Soder) then you're an ignorant fuck.
@bamibalboy its alright :) my english isn't the best either. Yeah I guess that goes without saying; a prime Sampras would beat a prime Federer in my mind.
A 19-year old Federer beat the 4-time defending champion Sampras at Wimbledon. What does Sampras have on Federer? Defeating him in an exho in 2008 lol? Federer is better than Sampras in every single department except for the serve, his volleys could be better too cause he was a darn serve-and-volley player. Federer on all surfaces
@kyuubiyura dude I thought we settled this earlier on you roach? Is there really nothing better for you to do except go on Sampras videos and troll? Appreciate his greatness and invincibility period. You have no life seriously.. why don't you take the high road and not reply to comments that you know will incite arguments? I'm revising for University exams, I'm starting to genuinely believe you have nothing better to do than sit all day and admire Fed on YouTube. Unsubscribe from life.
@pistolpete58 coming from the guy that once again almost instantly replied to me,proving you hang here more than me.and once again with the insults huh?hurts to know Fed is better i guess.and if you're so busy revising exams,why did you go to the trouble of repeating 4 times that i have nothing to do or i have no life.the invincible sampras lost in his first and only match against Federer on pete's best surface.i appreciate sampras more than you appreciate Federer,even though Federer is betterer
@kyuubiyura its called having a blackberry. when a said retard (you) comments on one of mine, I get a direct notification. You should try getting one, but I'd assume given the pitiful state the Ukrainian economy is in, their still limited to the Gold Standard, or the Nokia 3310. I don't care if I insult you or not, it just exemplifies what I feel about you. While I'm making a life for myself, u come out annoying comments like the aforementioned. This is a cyclical argument with no end.
@pistolpete58 lol racist joking?i dont really care about that,i have enough brains to not be blindly patriotic.and i didnt know they have blackberries in africa.you type these enormous comments filled with nothing but insults and then say you're busy studying.you insult simply because you never had and dont and never will be able to prove a point.you also seem to have a very huge ego for a nobody
@kyuubiyura jesus christ.. I'm sorry have I made you cry? You barely have any brains; otherwise you'd know better in engaging into an argument that has no end with a Sampras supporter, on a Sampras video. Lol I'm not in Africa, idiot and if I were, its South Africa; which is alot more affluent than Ukraines whose best export is elance.com its a very good way to vent while studying, talking down to an ape; yes ape because you should be treated as one for not knowing any better...
@kyuubiyura Nah, thats you falsely perceiving me; in a way you're right though, I do feel that I'm better than you which isn't saying much, but I ocassionally do take comfort in it, especially during such a stressful period. Lets see what Federer is going to do now. Tell you what, we'll make a bet. If Nadal wins the RG, which I think he will, you stop replying to my comments like the troll that you are. If anyone else or you bet on wins it; I'll stop commenting on YouTube fullstop. Deal?
@pistolpete58 im not surprised you need to delude yourself to make yourself feel better,quite sad really.as your account page suggests you just think you're better than anybody who doesnt agree with you.one of the hugest egos iv ever seen,and from some nobody.i guess africa sets pretty low standards.you should control your ego,you're just being an ass,and you haven't achieved anything either.you could emulate your idol,who actually has less of an ego than you.
@pistolpete58 nadal has a 27-1 record there,and djokovic is conveniently in the other half of the draw,quite the risky bet for you.ill accept the bet if you agree to stop replying to me after rg as well,independent of the victor
@kyuubiyura in your fucking face. you can never comment to any of my comments again. The better man won both in the RG and here, and this is why I'll always be the better person than you. Now, if you do write back, you've not only broken your word, but the principle of being a man. Up yours and I bid you adieu et au revoir.
@pistolpete58 you're so predictable.and you broke the rules,i said ill agree if you never reply to me again.you couldnt do that.and you're pathetic btw,you're not a sampras fan,you're a die-hard glore.if you were a true sampras fan you'd never be a nadal fan.and stop thinking you're better than others,you aren't,you're a worthless glore
@kyuubiyura lmao standard 'losers-feel-good' club response. you don't need confirmation from me if you add a stipulation, i would respond to you if i had a problem with it, but judging by non-response a layman would see that as an offer of acceptance. a die-hard glore? oh please Nadal has the true grit and heart of a 90's era warrior and contrary to Federer and similar to Sampras, he actually earned his victories in GS's playing worthy opponents. I don't think I'm better than others, just you.
@pistolpete58 "luckily for me most the people I argue with are simply put, retarded" thats what your page sais,so obviously you do have arrogance issues.and if you didn't agree to my only condition,then your entire first part of your last message was pointless.nadal is playing at the perfect time,he's finally good enough to reach finals on non-clay tournaments when Federer is already too old.and Federer is a fighter as well,just more nervous,and lets not forget the wonderful slowing of courts
@kyuubiyura it is true when I do argue with pro-Federer fans, 99% (including you) only know Tennis from 03 onwards; I love being right and I certainly showed you up and I probably would again if we were to bet (unless you make another excuse) on the winner of wimbledon. i didn't ever say I dont agree with your stipulation; the mere fact I kept silent constitutes a sign of acceptance. You haven't been educated to a proper level yet so it's understandable you jump the gun....
@kyuubiyura ...In terms of talking to you about Tennis; this boat has sailed a long time ago. it's like me being a bear with an axe fighting against a retard with a spoon. Ur knowledge of Tennis is substandard as witnessed by even doubting Rafa to win the RG, and lest not forget.. ur impeecable citing of sources when making outrageous claims like the 'wonderful slowing of courts'. U said that about Wimby and quoted players saying this only when Rafa came on, when infact it was an issue since 01.
@pistolpete58 since 01?right so that would mean poow sampwas was affected as well.and as for knowledge of tennis,you actually think Federer is a def player.how retarded.actually i doubted nadal for reasons,while you just ride the glore car.the wim courts have gotten slower by 4 m/s from 02 to 08,and gy the end of the tourn its even slower.sampras wouldnt win 14 gs now,but Federer did.now suck it and get a life and accepting the new king like a man
i love federer but sampras takes out any player in history, players from the 80s-90s destroys players nowadays.
federerownz 3 months ago
sampras > federer
andunusblick 5 months ago
Insane...
PatrickSmithPhD 9 months ago
These videos deserve HD for fucks sake.
picus11 9 months ago
lmfao, it's fucking disgusting how bad this guy was. can't play tennis so pretend to play basketball to get more popular? ROFLMAO!!! mug wouldn't even take a point from nadal on any surface
mattesper1 10 months ago
Who says white guys can't jump??
MrBen51309 11 months ago
Sampras trying to be Monfils
dura1mater 1 year ago
@dura1mater if monfils was 1/14th the player of sampras he would have a slam by noa XD
mathiyus 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@mathiyus Monfils sucks! Read my post on MOnfils if you don't believe me!
dura1mater 1 year ago
Sampras's slam dunks = the ultimate weapon in the universe
arguing on youtube? Sampras-Federer dispute? don't you guys have better things to do? both guys were awesome ine their primes, as simple as that
btw I do think that Gonzo was way more dangerous opponent in the final than Cedric Pioline
andrewblastoff 1 year ago
unfortunately, regardless of who was better between sampras and federer, it is federer who has topped all the great sampras records.
how can people really argue so much about a hypothetical situation that will never, ever be proven? especially if you use even more hypothetical evidence to prove your hypothetical argument?!
vaulcan 2 years ago
hahaha, sampras was a tennis beast.
he would have smashed federer and nadal when he was in the 20ies
Arjetube 2 years ago 4
no he would not and he'd probably be bageled by both on clay
89Pleasek 1 year ago
Thats Sampras prime time right there, not even the ''great Federer'' can beat this guy
pistolpete58 3 years ago 14
the "great Federer" from 2004-2007 would smack pete in his prime on a given day on any surface, especially on clay
89Pleasek 2 years ago
Hahaha what an absolute joke of a statement. Sampras's game was too dominant at this time and was literally untouchable. It's arguable that Federer would beat Sampras on clay yes, but certainly not on every other surface; i'd be willing to bet my lifesavings that the pete of 94-98 would destroy Rogers prime years.
pistolpete58 2 years ago
No offence, mate, but Pete was too one-dimensional for Federer. I can give it to Pete as far as grass (the fast one from the 90's) is conerned, probably would win 5 out of 10 times with Federer, but other than that, especially clay, no chance.
On the other hand - I don't think Sampras could win much if he played today. The Australian Open courts are way slower, grass is way slower, I'm not talking even about the French. The US Open would be his best shot.
89Pleasek 2 years ago
Pete too one-dimensional for Fed? If you want to talk one-dimension Tennis watch the Top 100 today. Sampras's variety was fantastic and to call him a one-dimensional player is u being an ignorant dickhead. You clearly havent seen Sampras play on other surfaces and he i'd say he would beat Fed on every surface except clay (however seeing as Fed grew up on clay this is to be expected). Yeah they changed courts speeds, ball heaviness etc so it could allow the top 100 of today to have a chance..
pistolpete58 2 years ago 2
1)too many what ifs
2)well at least pete looks one-dimensional compared to federer
3)ohh believe me ive seen sampras lots of times in action, he was a pure aggresor thats why i said hed be even with federer on super fast grass, its hard to root for sampras on clay and slow hard courts (like the australian and french opens) cause sampras kept losing before the 4th round to random players several times, federer is in each final almost every time beating young guns like nadal djoker del potro
89Pleasek 2 years ago
I could pose the same question to u about Fed placed in the standards & conditions of the 90s.If Fed wud av plyed the same game in the true 'purist' conditions of the 90's v Sampras, Agassi, Kuerten, Brugera, Rafter, Muster, Ivanisevic, Lendl, Becker, Courier (just to name a few) in their best years, would he still have won 14 Grand Slams in 6 years? If you do think so given the types of GS finalists hes had (Murray twice, Gonzo, Bagh, 35yr old Andre, Philli, Soder) then you're an ignorant fuck.
pistolpete58 2 years ago 4
ima write you a message, too many informations and to lil space here
89Pleasek 2 years ago
@pistolpete58 now he can, when sampras was younger federer couldnt win from him
bamibalboy 1 year ago
@bamibalboy i have no idea what you are trying to say, explain mate.
pistolpete58 1 year ago
@pistolpete58 ye i know, my english sux:P
the younger version of sampras would defeat federer, but now sampras is older, he wont:P
bamibalboy 1 year ago
@bamibalboy its alright :) my english isn't the best either. Yeah I guess that goes without saying; a prime Sampras would beat a prime Federer in my mind.
pistolpete58 1 year ago 3
A 19-year old Federer beat the 4-time defending champion Sampras at Wimbledon. What does Sampras have on Federer? Defeating him in an exho in 2008 lol? Federer is better than Sampras in every single department except for the serve, his volleys could be better too cause he was a darn serve-and-volley player. Federer on all surfaces
89Pleasek 1 year ago
@pistolpete58 he wouldnt beat him, he would destroy him.
picus11 9 months ago
actually the great federer would beat your "prime sampras" on every surface and you'd probably witness a bagel set on clay
89Pleasek 1 year ago
@89Pleasek Why are you stupid Federer fanboys lurking in every dark corner of a youtube video? You should all be put on an Island and nuked.
bjarktron 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And why dont you just go suck a dick?
89Pleasek 11 months ago
@89Pleasek have you seen federer lately?? he sucks.
OneNewHope 10 months ago
Sampras in 2001 was way worse
89Pleasek 10 months ago
@pistolpete58 oh hi.disagreed.remember the gs,the facts:)
kyuubiyura 10 months ago
@kyuubiyura dude I thought we settled this earlier on you roach? Is there really nothing better for you to do except go on Sampras videos and troll? Appreciate his greatness and invincibility period. You have no life seriously.. why don't you take the high road and not reply to comments that you know will incite arguments? I'm revising for University exams, I'm starting to genuinely believe you have nothing better to do than sit all day and admire Fed on YouTube. Unsubscribe from life.
pistolpete58 10 months ago
@pistolpete58 coming from the guy that once again almost instantly replied to me,proving you hang here more than me.and once again with the insults huh?hurts to know Fed is better i guess.and if you're so busy revising exams,why did you go to the trouble of repeating 4 times that i have nothing to do or i have no life.the invincible sampras lost in his first and only match against Federer on pete's best surface.i appreciate sampras more than you appreciate Federer,even though Federer is betterer
kyuubiyura 10 months ago
@kyuubiyura its called having a blackberry. when a said retard (you) comments on one of mine, I get a direct notification. You should try getting one, but I'd assume given the pitiful state the Ukrainian economy is in, their still limited to the Gold Standard, or the Nokia 3310. I don't care if I insult you or not, it just exemplifies what I feel about you. While I'm making a life for myself, u come out annoying comments like the aforementioned. This is a cyclical argument with no end.
pistolpete58 10 months ago
@pistolpete58 lol racist joking?i dont really care about that,i have enough brains to not be blindly patriotic.and i didnt know they have blackberries in africa.you type these enormous comments filled with nothing but insults and then say you're busy studying.you insult simply because you never had and dont and never will be able to prove a point.you also seem to have a very huge ego for a nobody
kyuubiyura 10 months ago
@kyuubiyura jesus christ.. I'm sorry have I made you cry? You barely have any brains; otherwise you'd know better in engaging into an argument that has no end with a Sampras supporter, on a Sampras video. Lol I'm not in Africa, idiot and if I were, its South Africa; which is alot more affluent than Ukraines whose best export is elance.com its a very good way to vent while studying, talking down to an ape; yes ape because you should be treated as one for not knowing any better...
pistolpete58 9 months ago
@kyuubiyura Nah, thats you falsely perceiving me; in a way you're right though, I do feel that I'm better than you which isn't saying much, but I ocassionally do take comfort in it, especially during such a stressful period. Lets see what Federer is going to do now. Tell you what, we'll make a bet. If Nadal wins the RG, which I think he will, you stop replying to my comments like the troll that you are. If anyone else or you bet on wins it; I'll stop commenting on YouTube fullstop. Deal?
pistolpete58 9 months ago
@pistolpete58 im not surprised you need to delude yourself to make yourself feel better,quite sad really.as your account page suggests you just think you're better than anybody who doesnt agree with you.one of the hugest egos iv ever seen,and from some nobody.i guess africa sets pretty low standards.you should control your ego,you're just being an ass,and you haven't achieved anything either.you could emulate your idol,who actually has less of an ego than you.
kyuubiyura 9 months ago
@pistolpete58 nadal has a 27-1 record there,and djokovic is conveniently in the other half of the draw,quite the risky bet for you.ill accept the bet if you agree to stop replying to me after rg as well,independent of the victor
kyuubiyura 9 months ago
@kyuubiyura in your fucking face. you can never comment to any of my comments again. The better man won both in the RG and here, and this is why I'll always be the better person than you. Now, if you do write back, you've not only broken your word, but the principle of being a man. Up yours and I bid you adieu et au revoir.
pistolpete58 9 months ago
@pistolpete58 you're so predictable.and you broke the rules,i said ill agree if you never reply to me again.you couldnt do that.and you're pathetic btw,you're not a sampras fan,you're a die-hard glore.if you were a true sampras fan you'd never be a nadal fan.and stop thinking you're better than others,you aren't,you're a worthless glore
kyuubiyura 9 months ago
@kyuubiyura lmao standard 'losers-feel-good' club response. you don't need confirmation from me if you add a stipulation, i would respond to you if i had a problem with it, but judging by non-response a layman would see that as an offer of acceptance. a die-hard glore? oh please Nadal has the true grit and heart of a 90's era warrior and contrary to Federer and similar to Sampras, he actually earned his victories in GS's playing worthy opponents. I don't think I'm better than others, just you.
pistolpete58 9 months ago
@pistolpete58 "luckily for me most the people I argue with are simply put, retarded" thats what your page sais,so obviously you do have arrogance issues.and if you didn't agree to my only condition,then your entire first part of your last message was pointless.nadal is playing at the perfect time,he's finally good enough to reach finals on non-clay tournaments when Federer is already too old.and Federer is a fighter as well,just more nervous,and lets not forget the wonderful slowing of courts
kyuubiyura 9 months ago
@kyuubiyura it is true when I do argue with pro-Federer fans, 99% (including you) only know Tennis from 03 onwards; I love being right and I certainly showed you up and I probably would again if we were to bet (unless you make another excuse) on the winner of wimbledon. i didn't ever say I dont agree with your stipulation; the mere fact I kept silent constitutes a sign of acceptance. You haven't been educated to a proper level yet so it's understandable you jump the gun....
pistolpete58 9 months ago
@kyuubiyura ...In terms of talking to you about Tennis; this boat has sailed a long time ago. it's like me being a bear with an axe fighting against a retard with a spoon. Ur knowledge of Tennis is substandard as witnessed by even doubting Rafa to win the RG, and lest not forget.. ur impeecable citing of sources when making outrageous claims like the 'wonderful slowing of courts'. U said that about Wimby and quoted players saying this only when Rafa came on, when infact it was an issue since 01.
pistolpete58 9 months ago
@pistolpete58 since 01?right so that would mean poow sampwas was affected as well.and as for knowledge of tennis,you actually think Federer is a def player.how retarded.actually i doubted nadal for reasons,while you just ride the glore car.the wim courts have gotten slower by 4 m/s from 02 to 08,and gy the end of the tourn its even slower.sampras wouldnt win 14 gs now,but Federer did.now suck it and get a life and accepting the new king like a man
kyuubiyura 9 months ago
@pistolpete58 absofuckinlutely
picus11 9 months ago
@pistolpete58 already did >.< (yeah i know he wasnt in his prime)
sfxslyx 7 months ago
@sfxslyx 'this guy'. a 97 prime pete is a whole different animal to an 01 (no tournament win since 00 Wimbledon) Pete.
pistolpete58 7 months ago
@pistolpete58 im pretty sure i already acknowledged that fact... but ok, good point >.>
sfxslyx 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pistolpete58 agreed. No one can comPETE with this PETE :-))
cammpinno 7 months ago