@unoriginality1 You are right. Which is why that part was not simulated. There would be nothing left to analyze. Remember this in an engineered simulation, obliterating everything is beyond the scope.
At very first moment of impact, some concrete pieces are launched at 500 mph from the building, in opposite way of airplane's direction. Does that really happen? After a blink while, the simulation becomes very natural.
Whoa, that looks like the Oklahoma City building....
This simulation is showing a crash that actually causes obliteration to the side of the strike. What's inteteresting about One and Two WTC is that we witnessed just how damned strong they were by how they stood intact after the hits. I still think there should only have been a toppling effect if anything, and that to the one most damaged only.
@N1k1mon If I understand you correctly, the toppling effect you are referring to would have required more force than we are capable of generating. Think of it like toppling a row of dominos, and then enlarge those dominos to the size of the WTC.
An empty aluminum body ... weighing several tons by itself. For the velocity depicted, you are going to have a lot of kinetic energy for the total mass of the body. Dispersal of energy of that magnitude will result in destructive damage to both the aircraft and the structure.
@tocamadera Planes still weigh between 70,000 pounds to 300,000 pounds, and their engines are giant solid chunks of steel that weigh around 5000 pounds. When travelling 500mph these things are dangerous as hell, and on top of that they carry tons of jet fuel which burns at a high heat and creates more pressure from detonation... these things are big ass missiles.
@frosty9595 because it's an engineered simulation. You could note that if we simulated the explosion that would have been involved, the rest of the structure would have been affected.
Great Video, this is a good show of how the weight of the top floors couldn't be supported anymore. It collapse almost like the World Trade did....If you notice the top floors of the World Trade just compacted and destroyed each floor on the way down. GRAVITY always wins.
this was an 8 floor building made of concrete, designed to support eight floors, no 47 large 4 x 4 feet thick internal structural steel I or H beams inside in the centre. Sure it would disintegrate on impact. this is if we are talking about the aircraft crash into a building in the Netherlands a few years ago
That building looks like the Oklahoma City Bombing building that was bombed, Timothy McVeigh was executed on my birthday. My mom brought home Mint Chocolate Chip Ice-Cream before hearing McVeigh's last supper was Mint Chocolate Chip Ice-Cream. We didn't touch for quite awhile. He was executed in Indiana. I was born in Indiana. Why did I go off topic?
FINALLY! someone who understands how the towers where built. I'm sick of explaining to morons that the outside wall on the towers was an integral structural component of the buildings. Rather than just a "curtain wall" And just like any other building, If you take out a part of the structure, it WILL collapse (even if only partially).
Has anyone Considered That Planes are not Made From Materials Anywhere Near As Dense As Building Materials??? And Should Be Torn Apart ThemSelves Upon Impact?? Missiles CAN Go Thro' METAL and CONCREATE Buildings, I Highly Doubt 9/11 Physics. They Are Extreamly Suspect.
Exactly what i say when people try to tell me the planes were too "soft" to do any major damage to the towers. Only i use the analogy of how a relatively soft lead bullet can go through armor plate when going fast enough.
Did you know that many, many missiles are designed using the same materials as the aircraft that use them. Think about a bullet, fire a 45 at a car door, the door is made of steel that is much, much stronger than the lead from the bullet. However the hollow door and the kenetic energy from the bullet will spell door for the door but the bullet will pass right through.
guys these things are not just "OH IM GONNA MAKE A HUGE BUILDING TOTALLY FREE" EGHHHHH wrong you cant use these free or even make them easily you need to have ALOT OF SMARTS to get all the programming/designing with 3D physics
BOTTOM LINE: ITS SUPER EXPENSIVE AND YOU CANT USE IT.
OMG, Could you just imagine how scared you would be if you were in that building <<<< and on the top floor which wasn't really damaged at first, and you have to suffer the fate of becoming kinetic energy as you fall with the building because the floors below you have been blown off!?
A perfect simulation of the WTC is impossible because we dont know exacty what happened inside the building between impact and collapse. A number of variables exist. Like how the damage unfolded. what debris and destructed occurred and where. And the various gas and electrical systems that were damaged and how they reacted/exploded.
You're right newyorkboy76. A "perfect" simulation is impossible, but for something that happened twice on one day, you'd think it would be possible to come pretty close. The whole point and question is what would it take to see it happen and how would the collapse unfold...admittedly, something even NIST couldn't/wouldn't do.
Can you do something that would resemble the World Trade Center Tower impacts on 9/11? The tower should remain standing after impact and then collapse in the same fashion as the towers. Can you do it? That would be totally awesome! Thanks.
There have been some discussions about re-creating the World Trade Center scenario. This simulation was actually inspired by those very events and believe it or not, the simulation shown here was created in 2004. At that time we decided not to do the WTC simulation because the tragedy was still "fresh", instead we opted for this smaller scale simulation.
Do you recognize the building in this simulation? It's actually the A.P. Murrah Building from the Oklahoma City bombing (used to verify the software). The WTC idea is on the table again, now that there is more distance between the present day and the events in 2001.
That was cool!
goldbullet50 5 months ago
Wow! nice.
peacepalace 5 months ago
how did u do that?
minecraft12352 7 months ago
what did you use to make this? Looks like tons of fun if it's an easy program
sicorange3 7 months ago
nice vid. kudos to multiple play throughs and rotating camera angle. i wish more 3d renderings on youtube would do that.
zombieregime 7 months ago
superb
algildea 8 months ago
Great work! :)
baishengren 8 months ago
AWESOME! AWESOOOOOME!
svartsaft 9 months ago
awesomely realistic man :) great job ^-^
fishy2002 10 months ago
This looks awsome nice one man
Jeramius23 10 months ago
Atleast the building was empty
marshalljimduncan 11 months ago
hate to be in there :(
warguyful1 1 year ago
THIS IS AMAZING....and yet a saddening reminder of what happened to my friend...
JamDP1100 1 year ago
im surprised no one said anything about 9/11
ItsTimothy 1 year ago
@ItsTimothy . They have, mostly conspiracy rants not pertinent to the simulation itself or of any value really.
appliedscienceint 4 months ago
Can you please make a model from the World Trade Center towers? Please?
robertdevald 1 year ago
Can you PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE make a simulation of the World Trade Center? Please!
robertdevald 1 year ago
Kewl
DrayAssist 1 year ago
the damage would be worse when the plane would have have exploded
unoriginality1 1 year ago
@unoriginality1 You are right. Which is why that part was not simulated. There would be nothing left to analyze. Remember this in an engineered simulation, obliterating everything is beyond the scope.
appliedscienceint 4 months ago
i want to see it fall
jimmyvbs 1 year ago
@dillfly2000 Not in this simulation.
appliedscienceint 1 year ago
@bigbengamer FYI, this is a model of the AP Murrah building without the curtain walls. Not a parking deck. :o)
appliedscienceint 1 year ago
@MrDanielleQ True, we didn't include an explosion or other thermal forces. This was strictly an impact analysis.
appliedscienceint 1 year ago
This is why my packages never arrive and when they do they are damaged!
legocreationmaster 1 year ago 3
wow nice
SuperDummdidumm 1 year ago
wow cool
bjadalull 1 year ago
That was chuck norris parking his plane.
Alerukio 1 year ago
*Someone on the unaffected side comes home from work there* His wife: how was your day at work? lol
HariPuttar1 1 year ago
Chuck Norris sneezes
Lindner12ewald 1 year ago
At very first moment of impact, some concrete pieces are launched at 500 mph from the building, in opposite way of airplane's direction. Does that really happen? After a blink while, the simulation becomes very natural.
Kw12345ff 1 year ago
When will we get physics like this for video games?! Battlefield Bad Company 3 anyone?
slayerd81 1 year ago
If there was an explosion
Most likely the rest of the building would have taken much more damage
crzydude412 1 year ago
Excellent!
SexyMelon 1 year ago
Whoa, that looks like the Oklahoma City building....
This simulation is showing a crash that actually causes obliteration to the side of the strike. What's inteteresting about One and Two WTC is that we witnessed just how damned strong they were by how they stood intact after the hits. I still think there should only have been a toppling effect if anything, and that to the one most damaged only.
N1k1mon 1 year ago
@N1k1mon If I understand you correctly, the toppling effect you are referring to would have required more force than we are capable of generating. Think of it like toppling a row of dominos, and then enlarge those dominos to the size of the WTC.
appliedscienceint 4 months ago
I would not want to be in that building lol
JESSE75946 1 year ago
If only video games had this kind of technology real time.
waffenshroodle 1 year ago
Nice. For some reason, this reminds me more of the Alfred P. Murrah building instead of the WTC.
TheNp42 1 year ago
@TheNp42 It is the AP Murrah Building.
appliedscienceint 1 year ago
Long live the physics engines!
JeannotvanBerlo123 1 year ago
plane is not a solid body is just an empty aluminium body.
tocamadera 1 year ago 33
@tocamadera Yes, this is the case in the simulation.
appliedscienceint 1 year ago 14
@tocamadera Actually its several hundred tons of aluminum traveling at a high velocity, which has a tremendous amount of energy.
nyc14gauge 11 months ago
@tocamadera
An empty aluminum body ... weighing several tons by itself. For the velocity depicted, you are going to have a lot of kinetic energy for the total mass of the body. Dispersal of energy of that magnitude will result in destructive damage to both the aircraft and the structure.
Watcher3223 10 months ago
@tocamadera Planes still weigh between 70,000 pounds to 300,000 pounds, and their engines are giant solid chunks of steel that weigh around 5000 pounds. When travelling 500mph these things are dangerous as hell, and on top of that they carry tons of jet fuel which burns at a high heat and creates more pressure from detonation... these things are big ass missiles.
sacr3 9 months ago
Great job!
SexyMelon 1 year ago
The building just got pwned by the plane.
Coastergeekperson04 1 year ago
What the program and plugin is?
doublesob 1 year ago
its too unrealistic...i mean who would fly a plane into a building?.....oh nvrmind
itsakadoozy95 1 year ago
is this program free???
mrledfeb 1 year ago
@mrledfeb No.
appliedscienceint 1 year ago
@mrledfeb no.
appliedscienceint 4 months ago
Why dont we get to see the full animation? It just cuts away before we see if the rest of the building survives.
frosty9595 1 year ago
@frosty9595 because it's an engineered simulation. You could note that if we simulated the explosion that would have been involved, the rest of the structure would have been affected.
appliedscienceint 4 months ago
Great Video, this is a good show of how the weight of the top floors couldn't be supported anymore. It collapse almost like the World Trade did....If you notice the top floors of the World Trade just compacted and destroyed each floor on the way down. GRAVITY always wins.
papavalium 1 year ago
cool! but that blilding is pretty weak to crumble like that! the plane would, in reality, get torn up.
MaryStewart 2 years ago
@MaryStewart Did you not see the plane "get torn up"? Please watch it again, the plane gets pretty well torn up.
appliedscienceint 4 months ago
i thought when a plane hits a building it will expload?but still cool
BlackSpid3y 2 years ago
@BlackSpid3y you are right. The explosion was not included in this simulation.
appliedscienceint 4 months ago
@h3ownage yes, it's realistic.
sinningg0d1121 2 years ago
thats beautiful
reiburn280419 2 years ago
WHERE CAN I DOWNLOAD THAT???????
braedenb12 2 years ago
The explosion would finish the rest off.
officialbassbounce 2 years ago
could this be used for fun
palkiapals 2 years ago
wow!! very cool simulation... I would like to see this very detailed simulation in a game ^^, but i know this is impossible right now lol
regisdrift 2 years ago
now that is how red faction gurilla should be.
gamerman001 2 years ago
What angle is this ? :(
HatlabuFarkas 2 years ago
this is good physics: 'd love to see these in-game
Fangelus 2 years ago
WOW! make more!
Jossebond 2 years ago
thats awesome
robertrageson 2 years ago
this was an 8 floor building made of concrete, designed to support eight floors, no 47 large 4 x 4 feet thick internal structural steel I or H beams inside in the centre. Sure it would disintegrate on impact. this is if we are talking about the aircraft crash into a building in the Netherlands a few years ago
gunthaarz 2 years ago
the plane just enters the ground? no kaboom?
CallumPK 2 years ago
@CallumPK you are right. We did not include the explosion as part of this simulation. We only wished to analyze the impact.
appliedscienceint 4 months ago
like do you have to make the building and the plane and the animation or you just get them and make the plane hit the building
peca5255 2 years ago
what software was used?
joe133322 2 years ago
Extreme Loading for Structures
appliedscienceint 2 years ago
@appliedscienceint
Where is Extreme Loading available?
What is it's cost?
Does it come with pre-built models, and how much work does it
take to build a model of a building?
I am a designer of process control systems.
Can it handle dynamic objects, like doors, valves, piping, etc?
Merlin5x5 1 year ago
@Merlin5x5 please visit the ExtremeLoading com site for answers.
appliedscienceint 4 months ago
fucking awesome
cpssnorman 2 years ago 5
thats excellent simulation
KoopaKartWii 2 years ago 5
so coool!
olgolu 2 years ago
lol, i saw one corner foundation still standing
GTAstuntman101 2 years ago
What program?
oc5nsli341nforce4 2 years ago
well done
paintballplus20 2 years ago
nice graphics
gorillaz6399 2 years ago
Damn, hope everyone's okay.
napone0 3 years ago
make more!
AllAmericanPerson 3 years ago
good, only half of it collapsed ...
phoebus1966 3 years ago
Did it collapse from the inertia of the plane going straight down? What would happen if the plane flew directly into it. Lets do some comparison.
CHRISLESSICK 3 years ago
that look so freakin cool!
sergiovalle21 3 years ago 41
Tell me about it!
crazybmxboy44 2 years ago 6
exelente, pero con que programa simulas la destruxion.
lezh10 3 years ago
why is the plane in direction to the buttom?
can you make one with horizontal crash?
rymen 3 years ago
make one where the whole building collapses
AllAmericanPerson 3 years ago
That was destructively awesome!!
ghplayer3 3 years ago 20
That building looks like the Oklahoma City Bombing building that was bombed, Timothy McVeigh was executed on my birthday. My mom brought home Mint Chocolate Chip Ice-Cream before hearing McVeigh's last supper was Mint Chocolate Chip Ice-Cream. We didn't touch for quite awhile. He was executed in Indiana. I was born in Indiana. Why did I go off topic?
famdude88 3 years ago 11
Man I love choc mint
treehuggingaj 3 years ago
Wow, that would have sucked. xD
Asdam12 2 years ago 7
Nicely done. I would be very interested in seeing something akin to this, but with a tube-in-tube structure similar to WTC 1&2.
Outer shell, core, floors held up by trusses connected to the outer & inner columns.
Then create a 1 floor gap 20 floors or so from the top, and see what happens.
lozenge124 3 years ago 10
FINALLY! someone who understands how the towers where built. I'm sick of explaining to morons that the outside wall on the towers was an integral structural component of the buildings. Rather than just a "curtain wall" And just like any other building, If you take out a part of the structure, it WILL collapse (even if only partially).
salemcripple 3 years ago
and i would like to know while the floors are pancaking down that the vertical steel core doesnt remain intact..Hmmmmmmmm
migo53333 3 years ago
no it do with extrem loading
disasterlover 3 years ago
Has anyone Considered That Planes are not Made From Materials Anywhere Near As Dense As Building Materials??? And Should Be Torn Apart ThemSelves Upon Impact?? Missiles CAN Go Thro' METAL and CONCREATE Buildings, I Highly Doubt 9/11 Physics. They Are Extreamly Suspect.
BrodyLuv2 3 years ago 2
Fill a water balloon with +/- 57,000 gallons of explosive liquid, and throw it 500 MPH at any structure, and see what happens.
appliedscienceint 3 years ago 97
i agree, anyone out there seen straw stuck into a tree after a twister? if its going fast, it will destroy shit.
matchesison 3 years ago
Yes but the tree is still standing.
chriswgood71 3 years ago
Exactly what i say when people try to tell me the planes were too "soft" to do any major damage to the towers. Only i use the analogy of how a relatively soft lead bullet can go through armor plate when going fast enough.
salemcripple 3 years ago
just as bullets kill people
GTAstuntman101 2 years ago
word for word, that right there is something I will one day tell my children.
"if its going fast, it will destroy shit."
tjakal 2 years ago 10
@appliedscienceint without a source of ignition nothing will happen
FSPilotsUK 1 year ago
@FSPilotsUK because a 767 slamming into a steel building won't cause a single spark or flame will it? Fail.
appliedscienceint 4 months ago
Did you know that many, many missiles are designed using the same materials as the aircraft that use them. Think about a bullet, fire a 45 at a car door, the door is made of steel that is much, much stronger than the lead from the bullet. However the hollow door and the kenetic energy from the bullet will spell door for the door but the bullet will pass right through.
streakingcameraman 2 years ago
i really wish you made something like this and then made it really realistic
StevenBlender 3 years ago
Please search for TSNS or TSNStudios.
appliedscienceint 3 years ago
Can I download that?
Theronguardaaah 2 years ago 7
guys these things are not just "OH IM GONNA MAKE A HUGE BUILDING TOTALLY FREE" EGHHHHH wrong you cant use these free or even make them easily you need to have ALOT OF SMARTS to get all the programming/designing with 3D physics
BOTTOM LINE: ITS SUPER EXPENSIVE AND YOU CANT USE IT.
Jacen47 3 years ago
professional
Escapatis 3 years ago
where can you get this software?
flyer2359 3 years ago
OMG, Could you just imagine how scared you would be if you were in that building <<<< and on the top floor which wasn't really damaged at first, and you have to suffer the fate of becoming kinetic energy as you fall with the building because the floors below you have been blown off!?
Yours,
julianallees
22nd April, 2008 9:54pm
julianallees 3 years ago
what software was used
dacid126047 4 years ago
Extreme Loading is the name of the software.
appliedscienceint 3 years ago
OW i need it
kkdperro2 3 years ago
can this be done on blender?
NukeMyHouse 3 years ago 2
Umm, no.
appliedscienceint 3 years ago
"Umm, no. "
So it's a custom-built program designed specifically for this stuff? Is this used for scientific research, engineering, etc?
mike4ty4 3 years ago
who knows thats a good idea tho
warhero296 2 years ago 15
i want this software!!!
poornation 4 years ago
Id love to have this software
LEGOdaddy 4 years ago
A perfect simulation of the WTC is impossible because we dont know exacty what happened inside the building between impact and collapse. A number of variables exist. Like how the damage unfolded. what debris and destructed occurred and where. And the various gas and electrical systems that were damaged and how they reacted/exploded.
newyorkboy76 4 years ago 4
You're right newyorkboy76. A "perfect" simulation is impossible, but for something that happened twice on one day, you'd think it would be possible to come pretty close. The whole point and question is what would it take to see it happen and how would the collapse unfold...admittedly, something even NIST couldn't/wouldn't do.
chriswgood71 4 years ago 8
Can you do something that would resemble the World Trade Center Tower impacts on 9/11? The tower should remain standing after impact and then collapse in the same fashion as the towers. Can you do it? That would be totally awesome! Thanks.
chriswgood71 4 years ago 4
There have been some discussions about re-creating the World Trade Center scenario. This simulation was actually inspired by those very events and believe it or not, the simulation shown here was created in 2004. At that time we decided not to do the WTC simulation because the tragedy was still "fresh", instead we opted for this smaller scale simulation.
appliedscienceint 4 years ago
Do you recognize the building in this simulation? It's actually the A.P. Murrah Building from the Oklahoma City bombing (used to verify the software). The WTC idea is on the table again, now that there is more distance between the present day and the events in 2001.
appliedscienceint 4 years ago
yes, please do try, i'd be very interested in seeing it as i'm sure many many others would as well.
menotyou66 3 years ago
Excellent Simulation
ugotownedo 4 years ago
Cool graphics!
Mundellproductions 4 years ago
yeah really
EVOLUTIONARECOOL 4 years ago