After initializing and parametrizing hundreds of unknown factors,inserting divergent proxy data and ignoring any difficult natural forcing factors,we ran hundreds of simulations until we obtained the results we wanted–an ensemble of meaningless projected results,which we then averaged. We utilized the liberally unprincipled component method to homogenize and sensitize this to produce a new hockey stick,which gave a very robust prediction (95% probability) that we are totally screwing all of you
Modern coal power plants put out water and co2 , thats it .
I no its difficult for the malthusian mind to comprehend but in this age we have wet ventury scrubbers and other anti pollution devices . Modern coal plants like cars are very efficient and clean burning . In the 80s and 90s car emissions were cleaned up so much as they actually clean the air in many cities . The reason they cant just set higher emission targets is because co2 is not a pollutant .
I did not buy my 3kw solar array because I had some misguided fantasy about saving the planet , I got them to be more self sufficient . They will never produce the power it took to make them , but nether will my TV set . The fact is that the power we use in Australia is the least amount of harm we will do to our environment . I consider myself an environmentalist not a fool , co2 is not and has never been a pollutant .
Don't believe they could be plotting the deaths of your children and grand children , go look at there web sight for your self . 80% population reduction . Genocide !
@brooklynct2003 YouTube does not allow links otherwise I would have been happy to. Just do a Google for Lindzen (which I'm surprised you haven't) and you'll get the other side of the coin.
Lindzen recieved $2500 a day from oil and coal interests for his services.1,2, 3 His article "Global Warming: the Origin and Nature of Alleged Scientific Consensus," was underwritten by OPEC.1
@Davinci77 And Tim Flannery gets so much money from the Australian Government that he just bought a new mansion below the altitude he claimed would be underwater if ACC went un-checked.
Why should we believe this one guy with no evidence at all? How do we know he isn't simply on the payroll of the fossil fuel companies? So he is saying that we can pour as much rubbish into the oceans and fill the skies with poison and it makes no difference at all...sure!
Why is he so sure of himself when no evidence when there could be so much at risk?
The CURRENT President of The United States has dumped massive amounts of borrowed monies onto his teacher pet eco-gestapo projects. Even though it cost more to prop up these projects than it could ever EARN or pay back. My own State uses 20+ yr old data & edicts from the far left progressives. Which has intruded on people's property. And economy. And drove businesses out of the State. These LIE$ run the democrat dogma. The problem is that people actually believe their lies. And then vote them IN
@memama2 Yeah, they are doing the same thing in California. Some new schools are being built with expensive solar panels, yet the panels won't make back the money in saved electricity for 25 years. These solar panels are not going to last 25 years and they can only produce enough electricity for the lighting. Good luck to them powering the cafeteria dish-washer with the solar panel on the roof.
This has been flagged as spam show
After initializing and parametrizing hundreds of unknown factors,inserting divergent proxy data and ignoring any difficult natural forcing factors,we ran hundreds of simulations until we obtained the results we wanted–an ensemble of meaningless projected results,which we then averaged. We utilized the liberally unprincipled component method to homogenize and sensitize this to produce a new hockey stick,which gave a very robust prediction (95% probability) that we are totally screwing all of you
1000frolly 1 month ago
Comment removed
1000frolly 1 month ago
Comment removed
1000frolly 1 month ago
Modern coal power plants put out water and co2 , thats it .
I no its difficult for the malthusian mind to comprehend but in this age we have wet ventury scrubbers and other anti pollution devices . Modern coal plants like cars are very efficient and clean burning . In the 80s and 90s car emissions were cleaned up so much as they actually clean the air in many cities . The reason they cant just set higher emission targets is because co2 is not a pollutant .
hopeintruth1 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I did not buy my 3kw solar array because I had some misguided fantasy about saving the planet , I got them to be more self sufficient . They will never produce the power it took to make them , but nether will my TV set . The fact is that the power we use in Australia is the least amount of harm we will do to our environment . I consider myself an environmentalist not a fool , co2 is not and has never been a pollutant .
hopeintruth1 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The carbon tax is a crime against humanity .
The U.N. wants 80% of us dead in sixty years .
Don't believe they could be plotting the deaths of your children and grand children , go look at there web sight for your self . 80% population reduction . Genocide !
The carbon tax is a good start for them .
hopeintruth1 6 months ago
Davinci -please provide a verifyiable link to your claim attacking Lindzen's funding.
brooklynct2003 6 months ago
@brooklynct2003 YouTube does not allow links otherwise I would have been happy to. Just do a Google for Lindzen (which I'm surprised you haven't) and you'll get the other side of the coin.
Davinci77 6 months ago
Here's the truth!
Lindzen recieved $2500 a day from oil and coal interests for his services.1,2, 3 His article "Global Warming: the Origin and Nature of Alleged Scientific Consensus," was underwritten by OPEC.1
Davinci77 8 months ago
@Davinci77
The oil companies love the carbon tax you fool , they all support it .
hopeintruth1 6 months ago
@Davinci77 And Tim Flannery gets so much money from the Australian Government that he just bought a new mansion below the altitude he claimed would be underwater if ACC went un-checked.
mlawren7 5 months ago
Why should we believe this one guy with no evidence at all? How do we know he isn't simply on the payroll of the fossil fuel companies? So he is saying that we can pour as much rubbish into the oceans and fill the skies with poison and it makes no difference at all...sure!
Why is he so sure of himself when no evidence when there could be so much at risk?
Davinci77 8 months ago
Great interview!
FantasticBob7000 8 months ago
every single thing he said makes absolute sense.
Rowanffe 9 months ago
he's the real scientist is he chris... you wouldn't know one of those if they slap you in the face with a polar bear
RepublicOfSteve 10 months ago
@RepublicOfSteve climate change is crap and a rort
breadbaker226 9 months ago 6
The CURRENT President of The United States has dumped massive amounts of borrowed monies onto his teacher pet eco-gestapo projects. Even though it cost more to prop up these projects than it could ever EARN or pay back. My own State uses 20+ yr old data & edicts from the far left progressives. Which has intruded on people's property. And economy. And drove businesses out of the State. These LIE$ run the democrat dogma. The problem is that people actually believe their lies. And then vote them IN
memama2 10 months ago 2
@memama2 Yeah, they are doing the same thing in California. Some new schools are being built with expensive solar panels, yet the panels won't make back the money in saved electricity for 25 years. These solar panels are not going to last 25 years and they can only produce enough electricity for the lighting. Good luck to them powering the cafeteria dish-washer with the solar panel on the roof.
rusty1491 9 months ago 4
@rusty1491 Ya, pity they didn't just put holes in the roof. (skylights)
Rhal95 8 months ago