I wasn't there but I can tell you these facts the distance between the camera man and launchpad is 3.4 Km , the rocket explode at the altitude of 3.8 Km , the distance between the camera man and the exploded rocket was 5.1 Km , rocket speed when exploded was 102 meter/sec
NASA almost always launches over open water, and clears the range prior to any launch. Being as this was a sub-orbital launch, on water, it was probably out of wallops, or kennedy. Both of which are located right on the ocean (in the case of wallops the pads are less than 100 yards from the water)... It most certainly landed in water.
think about that for a second. It means that they have to build another one. All the people who work at the factory who build them get paid, and those people buy groceries, services, etc. It's never really a bad thing. Be worse if it sat in an account somewhere and didn't get spent.
i live right by ATK thiokol in Tremonton UT, and almost everyone in the town of tremonton works there. ATK is the one that built the rocket, and i heard that the reason they blew it up is cause the rocket was going off course. It was not caused by ATK but by the nose cone produced by some other company. ATK does make nose cones but they were more expensive than the other guys cone. so NASA opted to go with the sheeper nose cone. i guess NASA learned that ys get what ya pay for...
This is totally not true. The nosecone itself was a NASA experiment called Hy-BoLT. While the shape of Hy-BoLT would perturb the aerodynamics of a rocket more than a standard nose cone, the blame lies with ATKs guidance system.
I worked on the rocket, saw and touched the nosecone many times. There was no defect in it. What you are hearing (misunderstanding) from ATK people is the notion that the flat tip of the nosecone acted as a lifting body and pushed the rocket off course. But, based on what ATK officially says now, it is unlikely that this is what happened.
you could be right, but after all of ATK's mistakes like well i guess it would be Thiokols mistake, like the challanger, and this, why are they still working on it? granted that challanger was a lot of NASA's fault but still...
ATK has not built full rockets in the past, only rocket motors. This rocket was their first attempt at building a rocket guidance system, which is a very difficult thing to get right the first time. ATK wants to get into the commercial launch vehicle business. It is arguable that perhaps ATK learned more from the rocket failing than they did had it succeeded.
That was too much to spend on fireworks but it should make them work harder and make that rocket series better in the end.
MrBetterTube 4 months ago
oh it that it was a fire work and said didn t this say it s a rocket but it seems nasa shoul go to firework business
segafan230 5 months ago
I wasn't there but I can tell you these facts the distance between the camera man and launchpad is 3.4 Km , the rocket explode at the altitude of 3.8 Km , the distance between the camera man and the exploded rocket was 5.1 Km , rocket speed when exploded was 102 meter/sec
Elamin008 7 months ago
Glad it was unmanned. That said, for a failure it looked pretty cool. Better luck next time.
repairdroid77 9 months ago
well...there goes our stimulus money
TheEgg185 1 year ago
There's one ET not phoning home anymore.
Vectorsumio 1 year ago
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Utuber580 1 year ago
i wonder if anyone was in there O_O
kim8775 1 year ago
@kim8775 i hope so
TheEgg185 1 year ago
When you wish upon a star.... Makes no difference who you are!
CottonBelter 1 year ago
Thats NOT a launch... CHUCK NORRIS SIMPLY MASTURBATED!!
MU51CxL0V3R 1 year ago
one hell of a flare gun
gottschlichmatthew 1 year ago
* Wonderful *
Firework ;D
SmokingBeat 1 year ago
works for nothing
likeicare300 1 year ago
The dang gravity. :|
MrHappy35000Br 1 year ago
MADE IN CHINA
JoseTwitterFan 1 year ago
@JoseTwitterFan You're probably right that all parts were made in China, but it was definitely assembled in the USA
bigcarpets 1 year ago
2 people
Qkumber1 1 year ago
A sub-orbital rocket? Mission accomplished? lol
heyeveryoneimcool 1 year ago
I like nasa because ;
Noob
Astronauts
Sucks
Always
DJMetroPolice 1 year ago
@DJMetroPolice Well...
Not
Anyone
Syntax
Applies
Iyoossaev 1 year ago
make a wish lol
eZPdQ911 1 year ago
that is what we call THUNDER CLAP firework..LOL
SilverKey165 1 year ago
nasa also did efx for independence day just look at that blast
rydgemolino 1 year ago
that wouldve been beta at day im just hoping no1 was inside but then it was only an orbital rocket
sam23696 2 years ago
wait was that the beach where it landed or is it some place wet and was there any one killed
madpyroman 2 years ago
NASA almost always launches over open water, and clears the range prior to any launch. Being as this was a sub-orbital launch, on water, it was probably out of wallops, or kennedy. Both of which are located right on the ocean (in the case of wallops the pads are less than 100 yards from the water)... It most certainly landed in water.
gravesclay 2 years ago
@madpyroman noooooo, no one died !!!!!! they just blew up for fun -.-
pimpmymail 1 year ago
where there people in there? Are there always people in rockets when they take off.IF there are then none of this is funny because they parish
o0oassieo0o 2 years ago
no most of them are unmannd exept for space shuttle
SpartanW98 2 years ago
What does this have to do with NASA again? You said in your description it was made by ATK
Roach1983 2 years ago
Funny thing is the safety officer that aborted probably cashed a $2,000 paycheck the next day. Yippee.
lookingforfun70 2 years ago
there goes your tax dollars, up in smoke lol
astronoman11 2 years ago
think about that for a second. It means that they have to build another one. All the people who work at the factory who build them get paid, and those people buy groceries, services, etc. It's never really a bad thing. Be worse if it sat in an account somewhere and didn't get spent.
NJPoolboy 2 years ago
and million $ are gone^^
nsawilla 2 years ago
Where was this launched?
storm92jk 2 years ago
North Korea
Matty231 2 years ago
Whoops !!!
rocketman6881 2 years ago
Good separation at 1:00 into the flight
solar793 2 years ago
wow this makes me want to play Battlezone! the fire balls resemble the homing missiles!
WormHorse17 2 years ago
were there people in there
clubpenguin1413 3 years ago
no. this was unmanned
rhudson18 3 years ago 2
No, unmanned
salil1991 2 years ago
look! a shooting star! make a wish!.........ooh! another shooting star!
MiraculousJeff 3 years ago
tax money well spent!!!!
realdoogie 3 years ago
NASA should go into the fireworks business
techohead01 3 years ago 43
@techohead01 haha. lol
SpaceAnimator 1 year ago
Didn't ATK work on the X-43 project?
NearSpace02 3 years ago
???
lookarken 3 years ago
I'm impressed nobody's jumped on this with "why's the sound out of sync durf hurf" yet.
hmmcnally 3 years ago
When the remants hit the ground, I was expecting a massive mushroom cloud.
Chocosizzles 3 years ago
shame that it got destroyed, but damn that looks neat. :D
DerMacko 3 years ago 2
spy sappin' mah rocket
singedrac 3 years ago
Damn!
CousinoMacul 3 years ago 2
shit i feel so bad for the engineers who worked so hard for NOTHINGGGGG.
pity
engineering model??
strasheep 3 years ago 18
i live right by ATK thiokol in Tremonton UT, and almost everyone in the town of tremonton works there. ATK is the one that built the rocket, and i heard that the reason they blew it up is cause the rocket was going off course. It was not caused by ATK but by the nose cone produced by some other company. ATK does make nose cones but they were more expensive than the other guys cone. so NASA opted to go with the sheeper nose cone. i guess NASA learned that ys get what ya pay for...
japaneseaggression 3 years ago
This is totally not true. The nosecone itself was a NASA experiment called Hy-BoLT. While the shape of Hy-BoLT would perturb the aerodynamics of a rocket more than a standard nose cone, the blame lies with ATKs guidance system.
mohodisco 3 years ago
there was a defect in the cheap piece of crap cone.....
japaneseaggression 3 years ago
I worked on the rocket, saw and touched the nosecone many times. There was no defect in it. What you are hearing (misunderstanding) from ATK people is the notion that the flat tip of the nosecone acted as a lifting body and pushed the rocket off course. But, based on what ATK officially says now, it is unlikely that this is what happened.
mohodisco 3 years ago
you could be right, but after all of ATK's mistakes like well i guess it would be Thiokols mistake, like the challanger, and this, why are they still working on it? granted that challanger was a lot of NASA's fault but still...
japaneseaggression 3 years ago
ATK has not built full rockets in the past, only rocket motors. This rocket was their first attempt at building a rocket guidance system, which is a very difficult thing to get right the first time. ATK wants to get into the commercial launch vehicle business. It is arguable that perhaps ATK learned more from the rocket failing than they did had it succeeded.
mohodisco 3 years ago
oh i see cool cool.
japaneseaggression 3 years ago
@strasheep truuuust me, they got multiple backups XD
ferretfrenzy05 1 year ago