I thought Sierra was a notch better, but then again I'm SO over the Lovell Sisters and their whole Indie/Pop/ Bluegrass thing. Or whatever they're calling it.
yeah, sierra is better, especcially vocally. but i like the lovells and im the kind who'll listen to bluegrass from grandpa jones and the inventor himself on up to lovin cherryolmes and the new stuff.
I'm all for new sounds in Bluegrass, but I think their "ambition" is leading them someplace else.
Seen them lately? I've seen the Lovells 4 times in the past 3 years - most recently in January.
I respect them for wanting to be the REM of Bluegrass, but,.....those perfect 3 part harmonies are now MIA. Replaced by "bluesy" dual lead vocals and bad covers of Rock songs.They are also touring w/ non Bluegrass groups now. I'm just disappointed. No big deal:-(
great break by the lovell mando girl!
kamren14 3 years ago
I thought Sierra was a notch better, but then again I'm SO over the Lovell Sisters and their whole Indie/Pop/ Bluegrass thing. Or whatever they're calling it.
b30307 2 years ago
yeah, sierra is better, especcially vocally. but i like the lovells and im the kind who'll listen to bluegrass from grandpa jones and the inventor himself on up to lovin cherryolmes and the new stuff.
kamren14 2 years ago
I'm all for new sounds in Bluegrass, but I think their "ambition" is leading them someplace else.
Seen them lately? I've seen the Lovells 4 times in the past 3 years - most recently in January.
I respect them for wanting to be the REM of Bluegrass, but,.....those perfect 3 part harmonies are now MIA. Replaced by "bluesy" dual lead vocals and bad covers of Rock songs.They are also touring w/ non Bluegrass groups now. I'm just disappointed. No big deal:-(
b30307 2 years ago
hmm, i didnt know that, in that case im sure i'd agree with you.
kamren14 2 years ago
Damn good.
bigdjindustriez 3 years ago 2