Satellites over Earth at higher orbiting altitudes can make out a license plate number. The moon doesn't even have a thick atmosphere to diffuse an imagine.
The burden of proof is always on the CT'er. There are mountains of evidence of man walking on the moon. And the incredulity of a CTARD is not evidence...never has been, or will be.
Prove the landers are not there, prove the moonrocks are fake, prove the Russians are in on it, prove the hardware wouldn't fly.
AND PROVE IT SOMEWHERE OTHER THAN A DUMBASS CT CLIP ON YT.
@LindaStevensBZ hey i asked u soe simple Qs and u logged off, and ran away.remember? s what protection was provided by the spacesuits? did the cameras have auto flash, etc capbilties? did it have extra large button for taking pic. with those big gloves they were wearing? simple Qs, just answer ythem , make me a believer, by the way, if thats ur real pic, NICE ASS.
What are your CT claims? Are they the same stupid claims that have been answered years ago by people 10.8 times smarter than you...and 1.6 times smarter than me?
HAHA!
YUP...probably so. Sorry,...that just makes you a gullible MoonTard as well as a Loon 911 Nut.
Congrats. Run along now and watch Loose Change for the 500th time.
@LindaStevens boring&a cop out.if u know the answer ,u just say it, if u dont have clue, because its too complex for u, then just say so,and beg forgiveness,all u said in that reply, was another opinion,u cant imply that u are logical scientist,and on evry posting,say NOTHING SCIENTIFIC.why is that? would it not be easier to answer the Qs,rather shit talk, i lay the challange at ur door again,4th time,answer or resign to admitting ur ineptitude. u are sad loser,by the way i have2 Deg,Hnrs.
@LindaStevensBZ well u are proving ur incompetence with every posting, how did u manage to get a job, as a teacher(dont answer that, most are pathetic parrots) and a scientist? u have a total inability to read, absorb the info. and make a logical reply. if u want to know the Qs, just go up read them again, it was on ur profile as well, but u seem to delete anything that proves ur stupidity.just answer the Qs i asked,& Armstrong making face WAS NOT 1. AM STILL WAITING,5TIMES NOW.lets see if u can
Like I say in my profile, I don't respond to every ConspiriDork question. I have debunked every MoonTard question years ago. Yours are pretty dumb as well. Sorry about that.
Trust me when I tell you that all your questions have all been answered years ago by very smart people. I know you think you are clever, and maybe your naughty parts tingle when you truth...but what are the odds a random Nobody like you has uncovered the Greatest Conspiracy in history?
@LindaBZ u are a disgrace to any1 who claims to be a teacher or a scientist,ur behaviour is anything but.u lack logic,info,data,U HAVE NOTHING,AND U ARE NOTHING,u have had 5chances now to answer in ur own words,rather than just saying"it has been answered before"what a loser.u could have had talked about solar radiation,micrometeoroids,Gamma rad. TMG on the EMU suits.background radiation of space,ionisation /.etc,NO nothing,even in their own site"Limited shielding against particle radiation"
@LindaBZ where in ur last 20 posting can u show any1 anything scientific,?show me it.all u say is opinions,OPINIONS based upon not Qs asked,researched then conclusions,but just a parroting of input of propaganda,i told u,i have 2 degrees,in Engineering,1 in humanilties,i can see through idiots like u , who upon passing&recieving a paper(certificate)ur ego has overtaken U,u are still a little plebian,hahaha.nxt time u have a shit,wipe ur arse with ur certificate that has enlarged ur ego.idiot
I, myself do NOT believe Oswald killed Kennedy,(impossible) nor do I think the government told the truth about 9-11. No, I do NOT think it was an "inside job", I simply think there are some loose ends that do not match the story. There are actual conspiracies out there, but this is not one of them. Not all these things can be lumped together, but there need to be at least a few facts and there are none for the Moon landing hoax theory.
"The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." -- Dr. James Van Allen
Like I said: "start learning about the 'van ellen belt'. And you will find your proof. But you will not start studying the Van Allen radiation belts and you will not start studying astrophysics, because you want to stay in your walled garden here at YouTube, which is full of delusional paranoia and ignorance.
Dr. Van Allen said the moon "hoax" was a pile of horseshit. And since you massacred the spelling of his name, you've obviously never read a thing about him or his work.
@Rob260259 They remind me of the crop circles people or Bigfoot people. The facts can be placed right in their hands, and they still cling to the fantasy.
Yep. Most of these people do HAARP, Illuminati, Templar Knights, Freemasons, JFK, 9/11, Trilateral commission, New World Order, Skull & Bones society, Bilderberg group,etc. etc.
NASA when asked by Obama to look into going to the moon-what would we need? THEY HAD NO IDEA. Had to go back to the original blueprints-what they could find.lol Their answer? They had no idea. hahahahaha
WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON.Just look at the press conference of the 3 monkeys that supposedly went there- TOTAL FUCKING LIARS. Stars? WE DIDN'T SEE NO STINKIN' STARS. THERE WERE NO STINKIN STARS.hahahaha
MANKIND HAS NEVER BEEN ABOVE LOW EARTH ORBIT. hahaha
ANYTHING invented by 1 nation has been copied-repeated-improved upon & PERFECTED by someone else.
Atomic Bomb-USA sole invention with the help of Nazi's & other collaborators.Soon stolen&sold to Russia-Israel-India-Pakistan,etcImproved upon Hydrogen bomb-God only knows what they have now.
Spacetravel.Russia-way ahead of USA.Suddenly COLD WAR-Need boost-enter PROPAGANDA.Usa goes to moon.IN 40 YEARS NOONE has ever come anywhere near going back.IMPOSSIBLE-NotRussia-China-England-NO ONE WENT EVER
@ed11561 What WOULD prove it to you? Going there yourself? You'd probably swear up and down that NASA quickly sent up "fake" decsent stages and footprints. Believe what you want. Those of us with BRAINS know we went to the Moon.
@Mozart1220 Come on dude.Nasa never made it to the moon.It was a fucking hoax. They spent TRILLIONS on the space shuttle-LOW EARTH ORBIT BULLSHIT. & never made it thru the radiation.Not 1 PHOTO has ever showed anything on the moon.
Obamaboy asked nasa what they would need to go to the moon-they had NO IDEA. lol They had to go back to the fake apollo plans & couldn't figure anything out.
@ed11561 There isn't that much radiation and what there is can be stopped for the most part by GLASS. The ONLY "dangerous" place was right where the Van Allen belt meets the solar wind, and they were not in that very long. Seriously study up on your science. The raeson we are in low Earth orbit is to study the effects of zero G so we can STAY on the Moon and/or get to Mars. Otherwise, there is no reason to go back. It's really not that tough to get there. And give up the namecalling.
THAT is supposed to be the LM? NASA PHOTO NO LESS-ITS fucking cardboard & tape geniusTHAT is a nasa photofucking ridiculous & dummies like u believe that shit? lol hahah the jokes on u
There isn't that much radiation and what there is can be stopped for the most part by GLASS.ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID? BLOCKED BY GLASS? FUCK OFF MORON Go learn some science yourself dipshit
You are dumber than a fucking doorknob asshole fuck off with your stupidity
@ed11561 No reason to go back unless we can stay a while, and we can't do that until we figure out how not to lose bone and muscle mass from low or no gravity. I just don't figure out where people get the idea that we never went. It's not that tough, and besides, the "hoaxers" need to study actual science. Your "reasons" are silly at best. "No stars in the photos" Gracie? Come on. A twelve year old photography geek could debunk that one.
@Mozart1220 No reason to go back unless we can stay a while,TYPICAL MOONTARD BULLSHIT. They sent fucking missiles there just to see if there was water last year.lol
until we figure out how not to lose bone and muscle mass from low or no gravity-MORONIC- THEY ALREADY KNOW THAT DUMMY.
If you had half a brain &was able to look at the LM on the moon u could see they were made out of fucking cardboard & tape.2FUCKING STUPID TO BELIEVE-HAHAHA.
@ed11561 You can always tell when someone has no valid argument. They bring the namecalling. I'll put my knowledge against yours any day. I have the facts on my side. You have childish namecalling. Have a nice life.
It is a model made of construction paper&cardboard&tape. THAT is a NASA PHOTO.
Do you fucking MOONTARDS believe that bullshit model could land on the moon & fly thru space at 17,000MPH?? MOONTARDS UNITE. utter stupidity.
DID YOU EVEN LOOK AT THAT RIDICULOUS MODEL LM? That was supposed to fly thru space? HAHAHAHAHA A veritible laugh machine-a barrel of monkeys-a TOTAL JOKE.....ON YOU. LOL U have no knowledge!
@Mozart1220 Have a nice day in your fog against FACTS. Apollo never landed any man on the moon.
Funny how ALL APOLLO MISSIONS were under the auspices of a guy named "TRICKY DICK."NIXON. HAHAHHAA
Ever hear of WATERGATE. They just didn't want you to know of APOLLO-GATE. LOL
The US government has been under control by the NAZI'S Werner VonBraun & his OPERATION PAPERCLIP proteges for decades.Just look at this country now.FAILING & GETTING READY TO IMPLODE. lol hahahaha
@ed11561 Now you bring Nixon in? REALLY? You run out of arguments so you go there? The Moon program was the baby of JOHN KENNEDY genius, and Johnson continued it. and Nixon only came in at the end. Jeez man, you are really stretching. Just give up. Science and FACT prove you wrong. Seriously, you are starting to look truly ridiculous. Von Braun has been dead for decades, and there are no true Nazi's left except small boys clubs. Get some professional help.
@Mozart1220 I didn't run out of arguments dummy. I simply state THE OBVIOUS. Looking at the photos of a cardboard model held together with scotch tape is PROOF enough. lol hahahaha
Now go get a doctor & get an operation so he can take your head out of your ass moron. lol
aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html
NASA PHOTOS of the LM on the moon.-DO YOU EVEN LOOK AT YOUR OWN STUPIDITY IN BELIEVING THIS HORSESHIT? LOOK & T H I N K !
@ed11561 I've seen the photos, and I've seen the videos. I watched all of it live as it happened. My Mom worked for Rockwell (Then Collins Radio). I met Pete Conrad and Mike Collins. All your "facts" have been debunked with such ease it's hilarious, so you bring up NIxon, and now you say the Nazi's are RUNNING ISRAEL? Again I say..REALLY? I was hoping you were just pulling my string, but sadly, I think you really believe this stuff. Seriously, get some help.
@Mozart1220 I watched all of it live SO WHAT? SO DID I. It was the most ridiculous bullshit show on earth.The moon landing taken of a fucking video screne on the wall straight from Disney MoonStudios. lol
I met Pete Conrad and Mike Collins. WHO GIVES A FUCK? I met MickeyMouse at DisneyWorld. lol
I guess you don't know shit about the nazi israeli killers who slaughter palestinians every day.That figures.Head up your ass about shit that didn't happen 40 years ago.U need help not me. hahaha
How can anyone in their right mind look at these NASA PHOTO'S and still believe that fucking "thing" landed on the moon AND THEN TOOK OFF. lol hahahahahahhaha
Talk about DELUDED- GET SOME HELP U need it.
That thing would never even be AIRTITE dummy. They would have imploded like cheese puffs if they were in that thing.
DELUDED & BRAINWASHED BY STTUPIDITY. They STILL don't know how to get to the moon.
@ed11561Again, your complete lack of scientific knowledge betrays you. First, you want to say EXPLODED since the pressure inside is greater than that outside. Second, it was that pressure that helped keep it "solid" and third, you don't need as much strength in zero G or 1/6 gravity. They did mention that they had to be careful, as dropping a screwdriver could have possibly puncured the skin. It's actually harder to go to the sea floor than the Moon. Try harder, this is too easy.
@Mozart1220 your complete lack of scientific knowledge betrays you.NO ASSHOLE I MEANT TO SAY IMPLODED U FUCKING ASSHOLE. Being made out of cardboard dickweed-it wouldn't be able to keep ANYTHING out no matter how low the outside pressure was.
You're a total asshole if u believe a cardboard LM held together by scotchtape can travel thru space moron.
It's actually harder to go to the sea floor than the Moon.BULLSHIT ASSHOLE -WHERE'D U GET THAT FROM YOUR MOONTARD CLICHE BOOK?Never went to moon.
@ed11561 If the pressure on the outside is less than that on the inside, it's EXPLODED. There is nothing to get "in from the outside". So I guess I'll take my knowledge over yours. Plus, I don't resort to namecalling. You know why? i DON'T NEED TO. I HAVE THE FACTS ON MY SIDE. I do not believe a cardboard LEM could travel across space, but I do believe an aluminum and titanium one could. You know why? BECAUSE IT DID. Now, bring up Nixon again, that was hilarious.
@Mozart1220 Hey asshole if the seams on the scotchtaped cardboard LEM or LM rupture-the pressure form the outside will implode the LM douchebag. Force it in upon itself. PERIOD.
Now douchebag-the picture-FAKE AS THE ACE OF KINGS. LOL
Aluminum HELD TOGETHER BY SCOTCHTAPE? impossible. lol Fucking moontards are so so ignorant. Show them a grainy black & white movie on a wall & they'll believe anything. hahaha jerkoffs.
@Mozart1220 The complicated group of maneuvers required by apollo missions are completely impossile TODAY.
It required like 15 infallible steps in sequence to even make the missions succeed.For that to happen what 6-7 times with no TRAGIC accidents in orbit was impossible.Fuck they couldn't even do that with simple shuttle missions.They blew that up with Challenger. If you gave NASA 10 years to go to the moon-they couldn't do it.They have no idea how to get there.40YEARS=NOTHING FROM ANYONE lol
@ed11561 Challenger blew up because they launched when the temps were 20 degrees below what the engineers recommended. It had nothing to do with "manuvers". Columbia blew up because they stopped painting the external tank to save weight and money. The hardest manuver of Apollo was a simple renezvous, which the shuttle did with the ISS a hundred times. Jeez, man, No stars, NIXON, and photos you wouldn't accept if you took them yourself. Seriously? You could at least make this difficult.
@Mozart1220 "The hardest manuver of Apollo was a simple renezvous, which the shuttle did with the ISS a hundred times" BULLSHIT NOT IN 1969 THEY DIDN'T DUMMY.They did it 20 years later in LOW EARTH ORBIT-totally different. The hardest maneuver Apollo supposedly did is the CM take off-TURN AROUND- REMANUEVER & PULL THE LM OUT OF IT'S ASS & CONNECT WITH IT. That shows your fucking IGNORANCE. IT NEVER HAPPENED.
They couldn't do it today dummy.Boy you're a MORON. hahaha
@Mozart1220 Oh i found out why they were never there.Because the DECEPTICONS told them to keep it hush hush & they told that drunk astro-not,you know the one who was drunk for 40 years-(from guilt) to shut up & say nothing or they would take over the earth. LOL HAHAHAHA
"No stars"- I didn't say that your hero astro-nots said that stupid. Didn't you watch the interview of the 3 monkeys? lol
Anyway that was it- The decepticons landed on the moon -we didn't. lmfao hahaha
@ed11561 Years ago I worked for a radio station in Salt Lake City. When the VERY conservative owner first heard Rush Limbagh, he swore he had to be a liberal doing a parody of a conservative, since NO ONE could be that far gone. I was just thinking that about you. You must be pulling my chain, since NO ONE could REALLY think the way you do. Please tell me you have been playing and you don't REALLY believe the things you say, because if you do.....wow.
@Mozart1220 MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ....MILLIONS realize that the MoonHoax was real & man never stepped on the moon. It was & is so technologically BEYOND what man could do it's ridiculous. I am so far from NOT being alone.
Jarrah White & many others show these morons for what they are LIARS.They had fake moon globes complete with camera tracks-yup just like the MOVIES.Fake moon sets-nevada deserts-hangars-everything.I'll send you the actual films with the fake settings.Not made for a goof but HOAX.
@ed11561 The "no crater" thing was already debunked. There is a couple inches of fine dust and then SOLID ROCK which the astronauts discovered when they tried to get core samples. NASA was acutally afraid that there would be several feet of dust and any lander would just sink, but earlier probes proved that wasn't the case. The descent engine was only at about 20% at landing, and the nozzle is WIDE so there wasn't that much force. Jeez, can't you do better than that? It's just to easy.
@Mozart1220 The "no crater" thing was already debunked BY WHO SHITHEAD? NASA? LOL What a fucking moron.
NASA can't debunk itself stupid.
It's just too easy to show your stupidity.Go back to lala land old man. lol hahaha You old fucks believe ANYTHING the government tells you. lol What a loser. hahahaa
@ed11561 It was debunked by NASA, Mythbusters, Phillip Plait, and anyone else with a rudementary knowledge of science and phisics, and the best part was, they didn't have to resort to namecalling and insults to do it. I think it's hilarious how you conveniently disregard anyone who was involved, or has scientific credibility as being "in on it". If you had any knowledge of how the LEM works, what the Moon is made of, and how things operate in a vaccuum, you'd see how silly you look.
@Mozart1220 It was debunked by NASA- nasa can't debunk themselves dummy-they just lie some more.
Mythbusters- a pair of MOVIE SPECIAL-EFFECTS ASSHOLES? Are u fucking stupid? Their videos didn't even make sense moron-totally false arguments&premises-Jamie"Adam looked like the astronauts did" so they must have landed on the moon??What the fuck?That didn't even make sense.lol
Phillip Plait,USELESS ASTRONOMY? LOL JARRAH WHITE DEBUNKS HIM AT EVERY STEP LOSER.
@ed11561 So, you conveniently disreagrd everyone who proves you wrong. That's pretty handy. More namecalling = No facts. Do you realize how much fun it is watching you dig yourself in deeper? And I watched the vids. They say nothing that hasn't been debunked with elementary school science. You hoaxers are hilarious. Keep trying though, it's very entertaining.
What's important is that the little boy in you that used to believe in fairy tales like the easter bunny, Santa Claus, and astronauts on the moon, grows up and becomes a disillusioned from the many lies your government has told you over the years. So here it goes.... No man has ever walked on the moon. There, you have heard the truth. Just as you dealt with the reality that there is no Santa, deal with this reality.
@ed11561 Landscapes look exactly the same from the selene pictures... equipment does not show up (and small rocks) because the camera can only make out images bigger than 20metres.
It is like talking to a child I think, you are found wanting I guess.
@ed11561 Look here, you can see the lander, the shadow of the lander, and path made by the astronauts foot prints, but of course your "brain" will ignore these pictures and cry fake, but I suppose it takes all sorts to make a world, the pics you posted are simply showing where they landed, bit like a picture of the earth and an arrow pointing out where you live. but I think you will struggle to understand that. nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html
Of course we went to the moon. Too many real scientists were involved in the moon missions for it to have been a fraud. NOTHING has come out on Wikileaks. Most conspiracy theorists suffer from sme kind of paranoid mental delusions. Saw this vid first. . .
then I checked your channel and now I can't tell if you're a troll or not. Your channel has all kinds of jaded, paranoid content on it. Please explain.
@nosajj12345 FUNNY how kaguya didn't show these enhanced foggy photos on their site but barely discerable photos of NOTHING. these are some moontards "enhancements"
blurry as shit i may add.
do u believe everything you see on tv also? hahahaha
@nosajj12345 "NASA released photographs of the original Apollo Moon landing sites made by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. LEM descent stages are seen where they landed. Thanks NASA!"
WHO RELEASED THESE DOCTORED PHOTOS GENIUS?? WHO?? NASA?? WAS THAT NASA??Now put on your thinking cap genius,if NASA FAKED THE MOON LANDINGS do you think they would put out photos TODAY SHOWING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING?? OR MORE FAKED HOAX SHIT PHOTOS that they doctored to look like proof?KEEPING U MOONTARDS HAPPY?LOL
'Black and white images'? What will satisfy you enough to accept the obvious? Polished brass picture frames? If those aren't footpaths, what are they? If natural, then what a coincidence it must have been for NASA to choose that site four decades before that LRO satellite arrived to show us the natural footpath-looking trail to be exploited for the hoax. You guys are going in circles so fast you're too dizzy to think and accept facts which can be verified by any competent photographer.
@datzfast "one small step for me, one giant leap of faith to belive this shit. some times you have to read between the lines."
Faith is believing in something with absolutely no evidence to justify it. The Apollo program left us with miles of still and motion picture images, witnesses, artifacts etc. Belief in the Christian god, now that's a giant leap of faith. And exactly what message are we to glean from this vid if we "read between the line."
this video does not prove nothing, with today's technology, you give us this back and white images, that are very vague, come on, give us the new clear and colored images, don't need to prove that we went or not, we know who was there first, space command was there first, with the nazi technology, give us the real truth and don't feed us with more trash
What a fantastic video! The astronaut footprints are so clear. I can even see the shadow, I think, of something. It's reassuring: all believers of the Moon Landing Hoax can view this and poof....their arguements, questions, and concerns vanish into thin air. Of course we went to the Moon with 1969 technology, on the first try. People who don't believe this should be kicked in the genitals for being unpatriotic assholes. Seriously! We beat the the Commies to the moon, and I for one am proud of it
Anyone who REALLY believes in the moon "HOAX" theory is a lunartick. Take your lazy, non-sunexposed carcass out form your mommy's basement, go to a friggin observatory, and ask one of the nice gentlemen there to point a telescope at tranquility for you. See that? yeah, now go do something productive and revel at the fact that if you can see it with your OWN eyes, you can finally STFU about such nonsense. Easily spotted with a decent amateur home telescope too, you nut jobs need a life.
@greenvaepor You are absolutely right in criticizing hoax nuts, as they do not have a clue what they are talking about. They are motivated by ponderous conceit and utterly impervious to proofs and demonstration which render their arguments absurd.
OTOH, we cannot see the things left by the Apollo astronauts with earth-based telescopes. Hubble can't even resolve them. We do have the LRO images and the Selene/Kaguya data which validate Apollo.
If NASA was really interested in pretending we'd flown to the moon, I'm sure they could come up with more convincing stuff than this. Almost anybody could create better hoax pictures than these in half an hour. The pictures are grainy and indistinct because the camera was working at its limit.
@7rundle What hoax nuts are generally unaware of is the huge mass of video, film, and photo evidence. I'd bet, if most newbies to this conspiracy theory were to spend a solid hour browsing the images and videos in the Apollo library, they would come away with a different sense.
But for them it is more fun to denigrate the achievements of others and pretend to be smarter than all the scientists in the world for the last 40 years.
A kid with a laptop can look at google earth and see a car sitting in a parking lot anywhere on the planet from "both geostationary and low Earth-orbiting satellites" or even a penis cut in the grass of Hazelton Pa. high school's football field and then check out his own house in 3D to see if his junglegym is still in the backyard. NASA however can't show you a lunar lander's base, a couple of lunar rover cars or the miles of tracks they made let alone a footprint as NASA shill claims in 2009
@angstotheclown Once again, as is typical among hoax enthusiasts, this is an argument from utter ignorance. LRO has shown ALL the Apollo landing sites and the Apollo EVA photos exactly match that data. The small features which show up in both could not have been known unless we went there.
The orbiters which have been sent to the moon do not have the magnification power that some earth orbiting satellites have. Higher magnification is needed much more in earth photos than in moon photos.
Are you kidding? I saw at least a dozen other little pixels casting shadows in each of these very crappy pictures. How the hell did you see FOOTPRINTS when an honest observer can't see anything except what might be a rock or some other thing casting what might be a shadow on a picture supplied by a government agency that disregarded their own technicians and killed two shuttle crews with their arrogance and stupidity? This is all so very sad, what this country has become. A nation of sheep.
@nekalaar OK-you swear that we never went to the moon then, so I`d have to ask you to prove that you were involved in the process of NOT going; otherwise, where is there any believability in your claim that it was in fact a hoax?
Let me get this straight...40 years after we supposedly land on the moon and this is the best qulaity picture we can get of this monumentous event? Every middle class American owns a high-def televison and a high def digitial camera but the onlty picturs we have of the moon are STILL these grainy blurry indistinct pictures? If we'd been to the moon we would have high def undeniable pictures of the entire surface by now.
What??? Arrows pointing to an astronaut footpath and a shadow of the lunar module?? You could say those tiny images are anything. I just don't see the proof in those images. Good effort though. Lame, but good. Sort of.
We all knew the moon hoaxer's claim that they'd believe it when they saw pictures of the landing sites was a lot of crap and that they'd just cry "fake" when the pictures finally came. Shit we could fly them to the moon and they'd just claim all the Apollo equipment had just been planted there the day before.
follow these - both at img153 . image shack . us _ img153 -
1. 8443_23935680 dot png
2. 7681_78845017 dot png
change _s to slashes
the 1st one shows google earth at about 1000 ft eye alt zoomed in on the liberty science center. the parked vehicles show up nicely. any sane person can make out about 8ft objects.
the 2nd one shows google moon at 5feet eye alt. on a11. anyone sanely explaining that is welcome!
Hell now that I think about it we still shoot lasers at the reflectors left by apollo astronauts to better record lunar orbital positions, absolute distance, rate of change etc if you've ever done surveying you'd understand...it gets obsessive.
In all fairness, it doesn't surprise me that so many people can be sucked into the hoax vortex. Most people don't really have the technical background to understand the evidence. So it's just ignorance; and who_isn't_ignorant about something?
What truly ASTOUNDS me though is the non-technical aspect of the Hoaxers: THOUSANDS of people would have to take direct part in that hoax. How can ANYBODY believe that many people could keep a secret?
The dots or landing sites might just be unmanned landing sites or digitaly put there. Please look at all the evidence before being so sure. I thought we had been to the moon for 38 year before looking at all the evidence
We went there, my University had several connections that prove it, we had our own S-Band receivers and recorded telemetry as well as voive transmissions, and as well a physics "demonstration" rather than an experiment compared time vectors in differing distortion fields, earth & moon both distort time as well as space with their mass, via reflective radio transmissions we were able to "ping" the spacecraft & compare chronometers, the results were as predicted, You couldn't possibly fake that.
Even before this, you had to be pretty damn ignorant or stupid to believe that the moon landings were a hoax. There was already plenty of undeniable evidence for them being real.
So not even pictures like this, and not even a trip to the moon to take a look themselves, would convince these less gifted hoax believers.
95% of the Hardcore Hoax Believers are just frustrated losers. Most are loners with no friends, no jobs, no girlfriends and no real prospects for anything positive to become of their lives. Totally insignificant...but with their keyboard on YT, they feel like they matter.
They think they will be a big hero by uncovering the secret. LOL!
None will ever advance much beyond assistant manager at Taco Bell.
Funny, yet kinda sad that people can be so gullible.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ces photos sont inutiles et ne prouvent rien du tout. Encore un bidonnage ridicule de la Nasa, tout les gens bien informés et honnêtes ne se font depuis longtemps aucune illusion sur ces conneries de cowboys. Allez au cinéma, on fait beaucoup mieux en images et vidéos de synthèse.
Ingénieur de la Nasa tournez la page et faites nous rêver avec des projets d'intérrêt public, ou recyclez-vous dans l'écologie ou l'humanitaire.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The evidence of a hoax is crushing. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. To see it, google "The Naked Scientist". In the "New Theories" section there's a thread entitled "Did we land on the moon?". The post is on page 15. It's the 7th one from the top.
Thank you David for all your efforts. Thank you for your 'revealing truthseeking investigations'. I guess you will be interviewed by scientific forums and engineering platforms very soon now.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The people who get interviewed are the people who make those videos and write those articles. All I did was make a collection of them.
If you think the evidence I posted on that forum doesn't show fakery, why don't you go to the forum and debate it? There's no character limit there so it'll be easier.
@Rob260259 where are these super clear pics that were supose to be out almost a yr ago? All that talk, and just that talk, about how much clearer the evidence was going to be. So where is it? U claim it was going to be undisputable. It's very easy to dispute NO EVIDENCE WHAT SO EVER.
Who said there were going to be super clear pictures? What do you expect? The LRO camera reading the license plate of the LM? Do you watch CSI and JamesBond a lot?
Do you know how a narrow angle camera with 8" aperture works?
@Rob260259 I know DOD/NASA claims to have taken pics of "date stamped on a quarter" from 300mi above earth. I also know lunar orbit is 60mi, so how come the pics aren't 25x sharper?? (distance sq for 2 demention) Just like to indisputable evidence, I know ur a smart guy thats why I didnt ask somee1 else.
Really I am board and looking for an argument lol.
did U ever find the calcs for UHF (sony style) whisker diameter?
Obviously you know shit. The LRO is not in 60miles orbit. I wonder what your source is on that 'DOD/NASA' story...
Do you still have that Yagi? I think that would be the best, with the elements diameter at between .001and .02 of the wavelength you want. A quarter wave for 579.25 works out to 4.85 inches I believe?
@Rob260259 Ooohoo, a little testy today. Yea Idamit the DOD/NASA story sound a bit (maybe alot) exaggerated, it only served to bolser my argument. But plz tell me how off my orbits are?? Do U consider my area calcs to be off, as in how much clearer pics should b?
I actually took down the yagi this wk, salvaged the balum for the sony style I hope to build. Being from Europe is that cm, we Americans are still in the bacward Std measure, LOL.
Well, the LRO is orbitting at about 31 miles (50 kilometers) altitude, for one year I believe. I'm running out of time right now, so have a look at w w w . nasa . gov / lro and learn all about the mission. Believe me, it's great to read it all.
I dont think there is going to be a way to convince thses moon hoaxers that we have been there. Short of strapping their ass to a rocket and sending them there to see for themselves. It seems conspirators are like cockroaches they never go away there will always be jfk conspiracies, moon hoax conspiracies, 9-11 conspiracy theories. I think there are even conspiracies about the lincoln assassination.
Damn right Candidate! The fact about conspiracy theories is that is what they are; theories. Anyone can start one and there are always some delusionals that follow 'the leader'.
You're right. There is always some excuse. More than that it should also say something that there is a conspiracy theory for every major even in human history. Apparently man has accomplished nothing it was just the governing bodies making it appear that way. lol
Cosmored3, looking forward to seeing you get your Pulitzer prize -- you know, the one that has eluded ambitious journalists and authors for the last 40 years, that would have been a slam dunk for anyone exposing Apollo as a hoax. Finally, you have arrived.
Like I said before, I didn't see a New Theories section. I'll take the time to read it if I can find it, but since we DID, in FACT, go to he moon, I'm not expecting much.
@Astrobrant2 Apollo program is not a hoax, it's a real imposture. No respectable scientist can accept what is presented to public as real footage of the Apollo spacecrafts. It's so chidly, poor puppets manipulated. The LRO camera's are good enough to give, on the fly, perfect videos of landing sites. My friends, wait long to have access to these. NASA has a thorn in the side, hard to remove. Would be better now to tell the truth, and unveil the real facts.
@degrangier Did you mean to say it is *not* a hoax? The entire rest of your comment demonstrates your belief that it is.
What would be your position if every single thing you thought was evidence against Apollo was actually ill-informed BS and was totally explainable?
Can you tell us why you think the spacecrafts and personnel looked manipulated? You might be surprised to find that there are perfectly legitimate and accurate explanations regarding your impressions -- things you DIDN'T KNOW.
Is this the best that NASA (Never A Straight Answer) can do with the latest new and improved version of Photoshop...show us an over exposed bright pixelated image? Well that's proof enough for me that we sent men to the moon...ROFLMAO!!!!
A.S.C.S. is known to affect one in 666 individuals. While those numbers might not sound frightening, we here at OPTOBIOGENETIX urge you to take our (now in clinical testing) A.S.C.S. vaccine...
these pics were taken from 50km off the surface of the moon.
the satellite that takes the pics for google is earth is guess what? 675km off the surface of earth.
but on google earth we can see cars people trees houses. but for SOME reason these pics are total shit.
WONDER WHY.
FAKE!!!
48mmwatch 1 month ago
fake
jembozzo 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lame.
Satellites over Earth at higher orbiting altitudes can make out a license plate number. The moon doesn't even have a thick atmosphere to diffuse an imagine.
My phone could take better pictures than NASA.
jgbloyd 4 months ago
OMG we can also see virgin maria @2:00 if you look closely...derp derp.....it's a miracle.. derp
hatessmug 4 months ago
Sorry MoonTards.
The burden of proof is always on the CT'er. There are mountains of evidence of man walking on the moon. And the incredulity of a CTARD is not evidence...never has been, or will be.
Prove the landers are not there, prove the moonrocks are fake, prove the Russians are in on it, prove the hardware wouldn't fly.
AND PROVE IT SOMEWHERE OTHER THAN A DUMBASS CT CLIP ON YT.
LOL!
LindaStevensBZ 5 months ago
@LindaStevensBZ hey i asked u soe simple Qs and u logged off, and ran away.remember? s what protection was provided by the spacesuits? did the cameras have auto flash, etc capbilties? did it have extra large button for taking pic. with those big gloves they were wearing? simple Qs, just answer ythem , make me a believer, by the way, if thats ur real pic, NICE ASS.
debunkNEGATOR 4 months ago
@debunkNEGATOR
What are your CT claims? Are they the same stupid claims that have been answered years ago by people 10.8 times smarter than you...and 1.6 times smarter than me?
HAHA!
YUP...probably so. Sorry,...that just makes you a gullible MoonTard as well as a Loon 911 Nut.
Congrats. Run along now and watch Loose Change for the 500th time.
LOL!
LindaStevensBZ 4 months ago
@LindaStevens boring&a cop out.if u know the answer ,u just say it, if u dont have clue, because its too complex for u, then just say so,and beg forgiveness,all u said in that reply, was another opinion,u cant imply that u are logical scientist,and on evry posting,say NOTHING SCIENTIFIC.why is that? would it not be easier to answer the Qs,rather shit talk, i lay the challange at ur door again,4th time,answer or resign to admitting ur ineptitude. u are sad loser,by the way i have2 Deg,Hnrs.
debunkNEGATOR 4 months ago
@debunkNEGATOR
2 Degrees?
LOL!
You're only 14 years old.
What is your claim? That Armstrong made a face in an interview so Apollo was fake?
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
LindaStevensBZ 4 months ago
@LindaStevensBZ well u are proving ur incompetence with every posting, how did u manage to get a job, as a teacher(dont answer that, most are pathetic parrots) and a scientist? u have a total inability to read, absorb the info. and make a logical reply. if u want to know the Qs, just go up read them again, it was on ur profile as well, but u seem to delete anything that proves ur stupidity.just answer the Qs i asked,& Armstrong making face WAS NOT 1. AM STILL WAITING,5TIMES NOW.lets see if u can
debunkNEGATOR 4 months ago
@debunkNEGATOR
Sorry guy.
Like I say in my profile, I don't respond to every ConspiriDork question. I have debunked every MoonTard question years ago. Yours are pretty dumb as well. Sorry about that.
Trust me when I tell you that all your questions have all been answered years ago by very smart people. I know you think you are clever, and maybe your naughty parts tingle when you truth...but what are the odds a random Nobody like you has uncovered the Greatest Conspiracy in history?
LOL!
LindaStevensBZ 4 months ago
@LindaBZ u are a disgrace to any1 who claims to be a teacher or a scientist,ur behaviour is anything but.u lack logic,info,data,U HAVE NOTHING,AND U ARE NOTHING,u have had 5chances now to answer in ur own words,rather than just saying"it has been answered before"what a loser.u could have had talked about solar radiation,micrometeoroids,Gamma rad. TMG on the EMU suits.background radiation of space,ionisation /.etc,NO nothing,even in their own site"Limited shielding against particle radiation"
debunkNEGATOR 4 months ago
@LindaBZ where in ur last 20 posting can u show any1 anything scientific,?show me it.all u say is opinions,OPINIONS based upon not Qs asked,researched then conclusions,but just a parroting of input of propaganda,i told u,i have 2 degrees,in Engineering,1 in humanilties,i can see through idiots like u , who upon passing&recieving a paper(certificate)ur ego has overtaken U,u are still a little plebian,hahaha.nxt time u have a shit,wipe ur arse with ur certificate that has enlarged ur ego.idiot
debunkNEGATOR 4 months ago
I, myself do NOT believe Oswald killed Kennedy,(impossible) nor do I think the government told the truth about 9-11. No, I do NOT think it was an "inside job", I simply think there are some loose ends that do not match the story. There are actual conspiracies out there, but this is not one of them. Not all these things can be lumped together, but there need to be at least a few facts and there are none for the Moon landing hoax theory.
Mozart1220 5 months ago
FAKE ! men never land on the moon.
underdune 5 months ago
@underdune
Try to find one (1) ounce of evidence to support your ridiculous claim.
Rob260259 5 months ago
@Rob260259
the most solid evidence is the van ellen radiation belt.
no live tissue can survive this deadly belt. and if so no one can survive the dangers of space radiation. no mension the trip back.
it even looks fake. it was done in the 60's you can see the fakery and the movie style set. its like a bad b movie type of set.
trust me man. ive spent above 100 hours researching this shit. its fake.
underdune 5 months ago
@underdune
"trust me man"
- How to trust a hoax head that doesn't even know how to spell Van Allen...
You must be one of those hoaxers that says: "I don't understand it, so it must be fake".
Rob260259 5 months ago
@underdune
"The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." -- Dr. James Van Allen
Rob260259 5 months ago
@Rob260259
he actually never said it. check the source... it will lead you nowhere.
underdune 5 months ago
@underdune
Yes he did. Now start learning about the 'van ellen belt'.
Rob260259 5 months ago
@Rob260259
well... prove it!
people said it to me before but no one could prove he did say it. no video or mp3 or official site is quoting this crap.
van ellen himself was controlled by the gov to dont speak out loud about his van ellen belt according to the apollo flight.
underdune 5 months ago
@underdune
Like I said: "start learning about the 'van ellen belt'. And you will find your proof. But you will not start studying the Van Allen radiation belts and you will not start studying astrophysics, because you want to stay in your walled garden here at YouTube, which is full of delusional paranoia and ignorance.
Rob260259 5 months ago
@underdune
Dr. Van Allen said the moon "hoax" was a pile of horseshit. And since you massacred the spelling of his name, you've obviously never read a thing about him or his work.
SpreadingtheMuse 5 months ago
And now higher resolution pics are available. Watch as the hoaxers claim they were photoshopped.
Mozart1220 5 months ago
@Mozart1220
Most hoax heads will say "fake" even when standing on the Moon, next to a descent stage of the LM.
Rob260259 5 months ago
@Rob260259 They remind me of the crop circles people or Bigfoot people. The facts can be placed right in their hands, and they still cling to the fantasy.
Mozart1220 5 months ago
@Mozart1220
Yep. Most of these people do HAARP, Illuminati, Templar Knights, Freemasons, JFK, 9/11, Trilateral commission, New World Order, Skull & Bones society, Bilderberg group,etc. etc.
Rob260259 5 months ago
I have yet to see a Moon Hoax Believer that can successfully debate a 12 year old girl.
GAWD...you Hoaxers are such Suckers!
BREATHTAKING SOMETIMES!
LindaStevensBZ 5 months ago
The astronaut footprints look too wide and large. Oops.
kamak894 6 months ago
NASA when asked by Obama to look into going to the moon-what would we need? THEY HAD NO IDEA. Had to go back to the original blueprints-what they could find.lol Their answer? They had no idea. hahahahaha
WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON.Just look at the press conference of the 3 monkeys that supposedly went there- TOTAL FUCKING LIARS. Stars? WE DIDN'T SEE NO STINKIN' STARS. THERE WERE NO STINKIN STARS.hahahaha
MANKIND HAS NEVER BEEN ABOVE LOW EARTH ORBIT. hahaha
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 Get an education kid, you're a pure idiot who seems to enjoy making a fool out of yourself in front of the entire world..
bibbler227 6 months ago
@bibbler227 Hey asshole i'm older & wiser than you fucktard.
You already have your little mind made up so fuck off & don't waste my time asshole.
watch?v=SeQ46eqgypM
watch?v=ngCCA9D25wg
ed11561 6 months ago
ANYTHING invented by 1 nation has been copied-repeated-improved upon & PERFECTED by someone else.
Atomic Bomb-USA sole invention with the help of Nazi's & other collaborators.Soon stolen&sold to Russia-Israel-India-Pakistan,etcImproved upon Hydrogen bomb-God only knows what they have now.
Spacetravel.Russia-way ahead of USA.Suddenly COLD WAR-Need boost-enter PROPAGANDA.Usa goes to moon.IN 40 YEARS NOONE has ever come anywhere near going back.IMPOSSIBLE-NotRussia-China-England-NO ONE WENT EVER
ed11561 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THANKS NASA- You've come a long way since your cardboard & scotchtape LM
aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html
ed11561 7 months ago
SURE WE WENT TO THE MOON LOL
*notice* found on the StatenIsland Ferry. hahahaha
watch?v=0XJFwcA7TOI
MOON LANDING VIDEO AT GRUMMAN MOON STUDIOS. HAHAHAHa
ed11561 7 months ago
aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html
NASA PHOTOS of the LM on the moon.
It is a model made of construction paper&cardboard&tape. THAT is a NASA PHOTO.
Do you fucking MOONTARDS believe that bullshit model could land on the moon & fly thru space at 17,000MPH?? MOONTARDS UNITE. utter stupidity.
ed11561 7 months ago
If SELENE had returned photos of Apollo equipment, I'd be more inclined to believe it. This is just another case of NASA saying "trust us, we went".
shanehoustein 7 months ago
@shanehoustein But yet all these moontards swear the photos prove apollo went to the moon.The photos,as u say. prove nothing.
Funny how we haven't been there.or any other nation for that matter,in the last 40 YEARS. lol
Sure we went.
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 What WOULD prove it to you? Going there yourself? You'd probably swear up and down that NASA quickly sent up "fake" decsent stages and footprints. Believe what you want. Those of us with BRAINS know we went to the Moon.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 Come on dude.Nasa never made it to the moon.It was a fucking hoax. They spent TRILLIONS on the space shuttle-LOW EARTH ORBIT BULLSHIT. & never made it thru the radiation.Not 1 PHOTO has ever showed anything on the moon.
Obamaboy asked nasa what they would need to go to the moon-they had NO IDEA. lol They had to go back to the fake apollo plans & couldn't figure anything out.
Fuck off stupid you have no brains asshole.
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 There isn't that much radiation and what there is can be stopped for the most part by GLASS. The ONLY "dangerous" place was right where the Van Allen belt meets the solar wind, and they were not in that very long. Seriously study up on your science. The raeson we are in low Earth orbit is to study the effects of zero G so we can STAY on the Moon and/or get to Mars. Otherwise, there is no reason to go back. It's really not that tough to get there. And give up the namecalling.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mozart1220 aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html
THAT is supposed to be the LM? NASA PHOTO NO LESS-ITS fucking cardboard & tape geniusTHAT is a nasa photofucking ridiculous & dummies like u believe that shit? lol hahah the jokes on u
There isn't that much radiation and what there is can be stopped for the most part by GLASS.ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID? BLOCKED BY GLASS? FUCK OFF MORON Go learn some science yourself dipshit
You are dumber than a fucking doorknob asshole fuck off with your stupidity
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 No reason to go back unless we can stay a while, and we can't do that until we figure out how not to lose bone and muscle mass from low or no gravity. I just don't figure out where people get the idea that we never went. It's not that tough, and besides, the "hoaxers" need to study actual science. Your "reasons" are silly at best. "No stars in the photos" Gracie? Come on. A twelve year old photography geek could debunk that one.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 No reason to go back unless we can stay a while,TYPICAL MOONTARD BULLSHIT. They sent fucking missiles there just to see if there was water last year.lol
until we figure out how not to lose bone and muscle mass from low or no gravity-MORONIC- THEY ALREADY KNOW THAT DUMMY.
If you had half a brain &was able to look at the LM on the moon u could see they were made out of fucking cardboard & tape.2FUCKING STUPID TO BELIEVE-HAHAHA.
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 You can always tell when someone has no valid argument. They bring the namecalling. I'll put my knowledge against yours any day. I have the facts on my side. You have childish namecalling. Have a nice life.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html
NASA PHOTOS of the LM on the moon.
It is a model made of construction paper&cardboard&tape. THAT is a NASA PHOTO.
Do you fucking MOONTARDS believe that bullshit model could land on the moon & fly thru space at 17,000MPH?? MOONTARDS UNITE. utter stupidity.
DID YOU EVEN LOOK AT THAT RIDICULOUS MODEL LM? That was supposed to fly thru space? HAHAHAHAHA A veritible laugh machine-a barrel of monkeys-a TOTAL JOKE.....ON YOU. LOL U have no knowledge!
ed11561 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 Have a nice day in your fog against FACTS. Apollo never landed any man on the moon.
Funny how ALL APOLLO MISSIONS were under the auspices of a guy named "TRICKY DICK."NIXON. HAHAHHAA
Ever hear of WATERGATE. They just didn't want you to know of APOLLO-GATE. LOL
The US government has been under control by the NAZI'S Werner VonBraun & his OPERATION PAPERCLIP proteges for decades.Just look at this country now.FAILING & GETTING READY TO IMPLODE. lol hahahaha
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 Now you bring Nixon in? REALLY? You run out of arguments so you go there? The Moon program was the baby of JOHN KENNEDY genius, and Johnson continued it. and Nixon only came in at the end. Jeez man, you are really stretching. Just give up. Science and FACT prove you wrong. Seriously, you are starting to look truly ridiculous. Von Braun has been dead for decades, and there are no true Nazi's left except small boys clubs. Get some professional help.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mozart1220 I didn't run out of arguments dummy. I simply state THE OBVIOUS. Looking at the photos of a cardboard model held together with scotch tape is PROOF enough. lol hahahaha
Now go get a doctor & get an operation so he can take your head out of your ass moron. lol
aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html
NASA PHOTOS of the LM on the moon.-DO YOU EVEN LOOK AT YOUR OWN STUPIDITY IN BELIEVING THIS HORSESHIT? LOOK & T H I N K !
ed11561 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 Science and FACT prove you wrong.Not Me. LOOK AT THE PHOTOS-it's so obvious that even a special kid like yourself can see it.
BTW Nazi's are alive & well & running Israel as i speak.
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 I've seen the photos, and I've seen the videos. I watched all of it live as it happened. My Mom worked for Rockwell (Then Collins Radio). I met Pete Conrad and Mike Collins. All your "facts" have been debunked with such ease it's hilarious, so you bring up NIxon, and now you say the Nazi's are RUNNING ISRAEL? Again I say..REALLY? I was hoping you were just pulling my string, but sadly, I think you really believe this stuff. Seriously, get some help.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 I watched all of it live SO WHAT? SO DID I. It was the most ridiculous bullshit show on earth.The moon landing taken of a fucking video screne on the wall straight from Disney MoonStudios. lol
I met Pete Conrad and Mike Collins. WHO GIVES A FUCK? I met MickeyMouse at DisneyWorld. lol
I guess you don't know shit about the nazi israeli killers who slaughter palestinians every day.That figures.Head up your ass about shit that didn't happen 40 years ago.U need help not me. hahaha
ed11561 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html
How can anyone in their right mind look at these NASA PHOTO'S and still believe that fucking "thing" landed on the moon AND THEN TOOK OFF. lol hahahahahahhaha
Talk about DELUDED- GET SOME HELP U need it.
That thing would never even be AIRTITE dummy. They would have imploded like cheese puffs if they were in that thing.
DELUDED & BRAINWASHED BY STTUPIDITY. They STILL don't know how to get to the moon.
watch?v=0XJFwcA7TOI
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561Again, your complete lack of scientific knowledge betrays you. First, you want to say EXPLODED since the pressure inside is greater than that outside. Second, it was that pressure that helped keep it "solid" and third, you don't need as much strength in zero G or 1/6 gravity. They did mention that they had to be careful, as dropping a screwdriver could have possibly puncured the skin. It's actually harder to go to the sea floor than the Moon. Try harder, this is too easy.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 your complete lack of scientific knowledge betrays you.NO ASSHOLE I MEANT TO SAY IMPLODED U FUCKING ASSHOLE. Being made out of cardboard dickweed-it wouldn't be able to keep ANYTHING out no matter how low the outside pressure was.
You're a total asshole if u believe a cardboard LM held together by scotchtape can travel thru space moron.
It's actually harder to go to the sea floor than the Moon.BULLSHIT ASSHOLE -WHERE'D U GET THAT FROM YOUR MOONTARD CLICHE BOOK?Never went to moon.
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 If the pressure on the outside is less than that on the inside, it's EXPLODED. There is nothing to get "in from the outside". So I guess I'll take my knowledge over yours. Plus, I don't resort to namecalling. You know why? i DON'T NEED TO. I HAVE THE FACTS ON MY SIDE. I do not believe a cardboard LEM could travel across space, but I do believe an aluminum and titanium one could. You know why? BECAUSE IT DID. Now, bring up Nixon again, that was hilarious.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 Hey asshole if the seams on the scotchtaped cardboard LEM or LM rupture-the pressure form the outside will implode the LM douchebag. Force it in upon itself. PERIOD.
Now douchebag-the picture-FAKE AS THE ACE OF KINGS. LOL
Aluminum HELD TOGETHER BY SCOTCHTAPE? impossible. lol Fucking moontards are so so ignorant. Show them a grainy black & white movie on a wall & they'll believe anything. hahaha jerkoffs.
ed11561 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 The complicated group of maneuvers required by apollo missions are completely impossile TODAY.
It required like 15 infallible steps in sequence to even make the missions succeed.For that to happen what 6-7 times with no TRAGIC accidents in orbit was impossible.Fuck they couldn't even do that with simple shuttle missions.They blew that up with Challenger. If you gave NASA 10 years to go to the moon-they couldn't do it.They have no idea how to get there.40YEARS=NOTHING FROM ANYONE lol
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 Challenger blew up because they launched when the temps were 20 degrees below what the engineers recommended. It had nothing to do with "manuvers". Columbia blew up because they stopped painting the external tank to save weight and money. The hardest manuver of Apollo was a simple renezvous, which the shuttle did with the ISS a hundred times. Jeez, man, No stars, NIXON, and photos you wouldn't accept if you took them yourself. Seriously? You could at least make this difficult.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 "The hardest manuver of Apollo was a simple renezvous, which the shuttle did with the ISS a hundred times" BULLSHIT NOT IN 1969 THEY DIDN'T DUMMY.They did it 20 years later in LOW EARTH ORBIT-totally different. The hardest maneuver Apollo supposedly did is the CM take off-TURN AROUND- REMANUEVER & PULL THE LM OUT OF IT'S ASS & CONNECT WITH IT. That shows your fucking IGNORANCE. IT NEVER HAPPENED.
They couldn't do it today dummy.Boy you're a MORON. hahaha
ed11561 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 Oh i found out why they were never there.Because the DECEPTICONS told them to keep it hush hush & they told that drunk astro-not,you know the one who was drunk for 40 years-(from guilt) to shut up & say nothing or they would take over the earth. LOL HAHAHAHA
"No stars"- I didn't say that your hero astro-nots said that stupid. Didn't you watch the interview of the 3 monkeys? lol
Anyway that was it- The decepticons landed on the moon -we didn't. lmfao hahaha
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 Years ago I worked for a radio station in Salt Lake City. When the VERY conservative owner first heard Rush Limbagh, he swore he had to be a liberal doing a parody of a conservative, since NO ONE could be that far gone. I was just thinking that about you. You must be pulling my chain, since NO ONE could REALLY think the way you do. Please tell me you have been playing and you don't REALLY believe the things you say, because if you do.....wow.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ....MILLIONS realize that the MoonHoax was real & man never stepped on the moon. It was & is so technologically BEYOND what man could do it's ridiculous. I am so far from NOT being alone.
Jarrah White & many others show these morons for what they are LIARS.They had fake moon globes complete with camera tracks-yup just like the MOVIES.Fake moon sets-nevada deserts-hangars-everything.I'll send you the actual films with the fake settings.Not made for a goof but HOAX.
ed11561 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 watch?v=SeQ46eqgypM watch?v=ngCCA9D25wg FIRST 2 THE BEST. lol watch?v=yEQNZQdJFtI
watch?v=7D3o1htlz9c
watch?v=X8COsP0N-2w
If you watch just the first 2 films & don't completely DOUBT THE MOON HOAX then you are beyond help. lol
But you have to also watch Jarrah White yourself also. Quite complete in his analysis. Have fun.
Don't bother getting back to me if you don't watch these films.
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 The "no crater" thing was already debunked. There is a couple inches of fine dust and then SOLID ROCK which the astronauts discovered when they tried to get core samples. NASA was acutally afraid that there would be several feet of dust and any lander would just sink, but earlier probes proved that wasn't the case. The descent engine was only at about 20% at landing, and the nozzle is WIDE so there wasn't that much force. Jeez, can't you do better than that? It's just to easy.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 BULLSHIT-DEBUNKED MY ASS.
The descent engine was only at about 20% at landing, and the nozzle is WIDE -TOTAL FUCKING BULLSHIT.
Didn't i tell you not to write to me until you watched the films? You haven't had time to watch all of them.
Jeez, can't you do better than that? If you IGNORE everything i send you,that shows what an ignorant asshole you are.
You already have your little mind made up so fuck off & don't waste my time asshole.
watch?v=SeQ46eqgypM
watch?v=ngCCA9D25wg
ed11561 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 The "no crater" thing was already debunked BY WHO SHITHEAD? NASA? LOL What a fucking moron.
NASA can't debunk itself stupid.
It's just too easy to show your stupidity.Go back to lala land old man. lol hahaha You old fucks believe ANYTHING the government tells you. lol What a loser. hahahaa
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 It was debunked by NASA, Mythbusters, Phillip Plait, and anyone else with a rudementary knowledge of science and phisics, and the best part was, they didn't have to resort to namecalling and insults to do it. I think it's hilarious how you conveniently disregard anyone who was involved, or has scientific credibility as being "in on it". If you had any knowledge of how the LEM works, what the Moon is made of, and how things operate in a vaccuum, you'd see how silly you look.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 It was debunked by NASA- nasa can't debunk themselves dummy-they just lie some more.
Mythbusters- a pair of MOVIE SPECIAL-EFFECTS ASSHOLES? Are u fucking stupid? Their videos didn't even make sense moron-totally false arguments&premises-Jamie"Adam looked like the astronauts did" so they must have landed on the moon??What the fuck?That didn't even make sense.lol
Phillip Plait,USELESS ASTRONOMY? LOL JARRAH WHITE DEBUNKS HIM AT EVERY STEP LOSER.
STILL DIDN'T WATCH THE MOVIES?ASSHOLE
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 So, you conveniently disreagrd everyone who proves you wrong. That's pretty handy. More namecalling = No facts. Do you realize how much fun it is watching you dig yourself in deeper? And I watched the vids. They say nothing that hasn't been debunked with elementary school science. You hoaxers are hilarious. Keep trying though, it's very entertaining.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mozart1220 SURE WE WENT TO THE MOON LOL
*notice* found on the StatenIsland Ferry. hahahaha
watch?v=0XJFwcA7TOI
MOON LANDING VIDEO AT GRUMMAN MOON STUDIOS. HAHAHAHa
ed11561 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mozart1220 aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html
LOOK AT THESE NASA PHOTOS DUMMY
your complete lack of scientific knowledge betrays you-LOL
Cardboard & scotchtape doesn't FLY in outer space MOONTARD. lol hahahaha
ed11561 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What's important is that the little boy in you that used to believe in fairy tales like the easter bunny, Santa Claus, and astronauts on the moon, grows up and becomes a disillusioned from the many lies your government has told you over the years. So here it goes.... No man has ever walked on the moon. There, you have heard the truth. Just as you dealt with the reality that there is no Santa, deal with this reality.
LOL LOOKS LIKE ALOT OF PEOPLE KNOW YOU. LOL
ed11561 7 months ago
haha...just look at it, would ya?!? sometimes that's all ya can do, just look at it.....
XTheSonofTheSunX 8 months ago
APOLLO 11- ABSOLUTELY N O T H I N G!!
wms .selene .jaxa.jp/selene_viewer/en/observation_mission/mi/mi_002.html
ed11561 8 months ago
@ed11561 Landscapes look exactly the same from the selene pictures... equipment does not show up (and small rocks) because the camera can only make out images bigger than 20metres.
It is like talking to a child I think, you are found wanting I guess.
daiitokumyouou899 7 months ago
@daiitokumyouou899 Hey asshole i already know that schmuck.
Try telling that to the moon-tards who swear they see the LM & apollo remnants douchebag.
Landscapes MEAN NOTHING shithead.They PROVE NOTHING.
Now run along & play retard.
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 Actually they prove everything... Obvious troll is obvious :/
daiitokumyouou899 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@daiitokumyouou899 The photo's show NOTHING moontard.
Troll? YOU wrote to me asshole.I'm not trolling anything schmuck.lol
If SELENE had returned photos of Apollo equipment, I'd be more inclined to believe it. This is just another case of NASA saying "trust us, we went".
shanehoustein
I'm not the only one who knows this moron.Take your moontard head out of your moontard ass. hahaha
ed11561 7 months ago
APOLLO 15.... YOU GUESSED IT.....NOTHING
wms .selene .jaxa.jp/selene_viewer/en/observation_mission/tc/tc_007.html
ed11561 8 months ago
@ed11561 Look here, you can see the lander, the shadow of the lander, and path made by the astronauts foot prints, but of course your "brain" will ignore these pictures and cry fake, but I suppose it takes all sorts to make a world, the pics you posted are simply showing where they landed, bit like a picture of the earth and an arrow pointing out where you live. but I think you will struggle to understand that. nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html
musicbruv 8 months ago
APOLLO 17 AGAIN.......NOTHING
wms. selene. jaxa. jp/selene_viewer/en/observation_mission/tc/tc_009.html
ed11561 8 months ago
wms .selene. jaxa .jp/selene_viewer/en/observation_mission/tc/tc_011.html
APOLLO 17 SHOWS NOTHING
ed11561 8 months ago
Hollywood still makes good graphical images & movies today!
a2zhandi 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@a2zhandi "Hollywood still makes good graphical images & movies today!"
You bet your ass they do! But how does that relate this video??
nosajj12345 8 months ago
Image's are so pixelated it might as well be made from LEGO
kaderoder 11 months ago
Of course we went to the moon. Too many real scientists were involved in the moon missions for it to have been a fraud. NOTHING has come out on Wikileaks. Most conspiracy theorists suffer from sme kind of paranoid mental delusions. Saw this vid first. . .
then I checked your channel and now I can't tell if you're a troll or not. Your channel has all kinds of jaded, paranoid content on it. Please explain.
jdh501 11 months ago
no fucking way in hell are these photos NOT doctored.Kaguya showed exactly NOTHING. No proof whatsoever of a MANNED landing & departure.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 "no fucking way in hell are these photos NOT doctored.Kaguya showed exactly NOTHING."
Nothing?
Jee, I better get my eyes checked. I could swear I see tracks, objects casting shadows and what appear to be footprints all in the same general area.
nosajj12345 8 months ago
@nosajj12345 FUNNY how kaguya didn't show these enhanced foggy photos on their site but barely discerable photos of NOTHING. these are some moontards "enhancements"
blurry as shit i may add.
do u believe everything you see on tv also? hahahaha
ed11561 8 months ago
@nosajj12345 YOU better get your eyes checked or rather watch out who you believe because this is all horseshit.
Look at photos from the REAL kaguya.
wms. selene .jaxa.jp/selene_viewer/en/observation_mission/tc/tc_005.html
THEY SHOW NOTHING. HAHAHAHA Look at all the other 1's i posted too. NONE ENHANCED
ed11561 8 months ago
@ed11561 I see the meat head is back showing the world how dumb he is. you are very funny
musicbruv 8 months ago
@nosajj12345 "NASA released photographs of the original Apollo Moon landing sites made by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. LEM descent stages are seen where they landed. Thanks NASA!"
WHO RELEASED THESE DOCTORED PHOTOS GENIUS?? WHO?? NASA?? WAS THAT NASA??Now put on your thinking cap genius,if NASA FAKED THE MOON LANDINGS do you think they would put out photos TODAY SHOWING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING?? OR MORE FAKED HOAX SHIT PHOTOS that they doctored to look like proof?KEEPING U MOONTARDS HAPPY?LOL
ed11561 8 months ago
'Black and white images'? What will satisfy you enough to accept the obvious? Polished brass picture frames? If those aren't footpaths, what are they? If natural, then what a coincidence it must have been for NASA to choose that site four decades before that LRO satellite arrived to show us the natural footpath-looking trail to be exploited for the hoax. You guys are going in circles so fast you're too dizzy to think and accept facts which can be verified by any competent photographer.
Planetar11 1 year ago
one small step for me, one giant leap of faith to belive this shit. some times you have to read between the lines.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast "one small step for me, one giant leap of faith to belive this shit. some times you have to read between the lines."
Faith is believing in something with absolutely no evidence to justify it. The Apollo program left us with miles of still and motion picture images, witnesses, artifacts etc. Belief in the Christian god, now that's a giant leap of faith. And exactly what message are we to glean from this vid if we "read between the line."
nosajj12345 8 months ago
@nosaj 12345 i dont know? your the one that gives it meaning. how? by believing it. i never required belief in the first place.obviously
datzfast 8 months ago
this video does not prove nothing, with today's technology, you give us this back and white images, that are very vague, come on, give us the new clear and colored images, don't need to prove that we went or not, we know who was there first, space command was there first, with the nazi technology, give us the real truth and don't feed us with more trash
acaticlopez 1 year ago
how does it do the lazer topograpy maps? did nasa cover the entire moon with little mirrors first?
datzfast 1 year ago
What a fantastic video! The astronaut footprints are so clear. I can even see the shadow, I think, of something. It's reassuring: all believers of the Moon Landing Hoax can view this and poof....their arguements, questions, and concerns vanish into thin air. Of course we went to the Moon with 1969 technology, on the first try. People who don't believe this should be kicked in the genitals for being unpatriotic assholes. Seriously! We beat the the Commies to the moon, and I for one am proud of it
greenfruitface 1 year ago
BOOM!
YaMumYaNanYaGran 1 year ago
Anyone who REALLY believes in the moon "HOAX" theory is a lunartick. Take your lazy, non-sunexposed carcass out form your mommy's basement, go to a friggin observatory, and ask one of the nice gentlemen there to point a telescope at tranquility for you. See that? yeah, now go do something productive and revel at the fact that if you can see it with your OWN eyes, you can finally STFU about such nonsense. Easily spotted with a decent amateur home telescope too, you nut jobs need a life.
greenvaepor 1 year ago 2
@greenvaepor You are absolutely right in criticizing hoax nuts, as they do not have a clue what they are talking about. They are motivated by ponderous conceit and utterly impervious to proofs and demonstration which render their arguments absurd.
OTOH, we cannot see the things left by the Apollo astronauts with earth-based telescopes. Hubble can't even resolve them. We do have the LRO images and the Selene/Kaguya data which validate Apollo.
Astrobrant2 1 year ago
If NASA was really interested in pretending we'd flown to the moon, I'm sure they could come up with more convincing stuff than this. Almost anybody could create better hoax pictures than these in half an hour. The pictures are grainy and indistinct because the camera was working at its limit.
7rundle 1 year ago
@7rundle What hoax nuts are generally unaware of is the huge mass of video, film, and photo evidence. I'd bet, if most newbies to this conspiracy theory were to spend a solid hour browsing the images and videos in the Apollo library, they would come away with a different sense.
But for them it is more fun to denigrate the achievements of others and pretend to be smarter than all the scientists in the world for the last 40 years.
Astrobrant2 1 year ago 2
A kid with a laptop can look at google earth and see a car sitting in a parking lot anywhere on the planet from "both geostationary and low Earth-orbiting satellites" or even a penis cut in the grass of Hazelton Pa. high school's football field and then check out his own house in 3D to see if his junglegym is still in the backyard. NASA however can't show you a lunar lander's base, a couple of lunar rover cars or the miles of tracks they made let alone a footprint as NASA shill claims in 2009
angstotheclown 1 year ago
@angstotheclown Once again, as is typical among hoax enthusiasts, this is an argument from utter ignorance. LRO has shown ALL the Apollo landing sites and the Apollo EVA photos exactly match that data. The small features which show up in both could not have been known unless we went there.
The orbiters which have been sent to the moon do not have the magnification power that some earth orbiting satellites have. Higher magnification is needed much more in earth photos than in moon photos.
Astrobrant2 1 year ago 2
Are you kidding? I saw at least a dozen other little pixels casting shadows in each of these very crappy pictures. How the hell did you see FOOTPRINTS when an honest observer can't see anything except what might be a rock or some other thing casting what might be a shadow on a picture supplied by a government agency that disregarded their own technicians and killed two shuttle crews with their arrogance and stupidity? This is all so very sad, what this country has become. A nation of sheep.
angstotheclown 1 year ago
@angstotheclown "sigh" You conspiracy hoax morons are sooo tiresome. Go to bed-it`s way past your bedtime--and try not to to drool or wet your beds.
25411959 1 year ago 2
@25411959 show us one piece of real evidence that we went, you can't
We never went - trust me I know, I was involved in the process
nekalaar 10 months ago
@nekalaar OK-you swear that we never went to the moon then, so I`d have to ask you to prove that you were involved in the process of NOT going; otherwise, where is there any believability in your claim that it was in fact a hoax?
25411959 10 months ago
Let me get this straight...40 years after we supposedly land on the moon and this is the best qulaity picture we can get of this monumentous event? Every middle class American owns a high-def televison and a high def digitial camera but the onlty picturs we have of the moon are STILL these grainy blurry indistinct pictures? If we'd been to the moon we would have high def undeniable pictures of the entire surface by now.
niverent 1 year ago
@niverent If you hoaxers got high-quality pictures you would just say that they were faked too.
And if you were brought on a real moon journey yourselves then you would say it was a hologram or something.
Laurelindo 10 months ago
It's been 6 months since we lost you. I wish it didn't have to end that way.
momfishx2 1 year ago
FUCKING U.S.A!!
aaronvenora 1 year ago
What??? Arrows pointing to an astronaut footpath and a shadow of the lunar module?? You could say those tiny images are anything. I just don't see the proof in those images. Good effort though. Lame, but good. Sort of.
alamo281 1 year ago 2
FALSO FALSO FALSO!!!!
mustainelee 1 year ago
@mustainelee
We all knew the moon hoaxer's claim that they'd believe it when they saw pictures of the landing sites was a lot of crap and that they'd just cry "fake" when the pictures finally came. Shit we could fly them to the moon and they'd just claim all the Apollo equipment had just been planted there the day before.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
follow these - both at img153 . image shack . us _ img153 -
1. 8443_23935680 dot png
2. 7681_78845017 dot png
change _s to slashes
the 1st one shows google earth at about 1000 ft eye alt zoomed in on the liberty science center. the parked vehicles show up nicely. any sane person can make out about 8ft objects.
the 2nd one shows google moon at 5feet eye alt. on a11. anyone sanely explaining that is welcome!
zambi007i 1 year ago
FYI Hoax Dumbasses!
The burden of proof is on you.
YOU go prove the relics are not there. You go prove the moonrocks are fake.
You go prove that the Soviet radar operators were all bribed by LBJ and Nixon.
Dumbasses!
LindaStevensBZ 1 year ago
Hell now that I think about it we still shoot lasers at the reflectors left by apollo astronauts to better record lunar orbital positions, absolute distance, rate of change etc if you've ever done surveying you'd understand...it gets obsessive.
cornskid 2 years ago
In all fairness, it doesn't surprise me that so many people can be sucked into the hoax vortex. Most people don't really have the technical background to understand the evidence. So it's just ignorance; and who_isn't_ignorant about something?
What truly ASTOUNDS me though is the non-technical aspect of the Hoaxers: THOUSANDS of people would have to take direct part in that hoax. How can ANYBODY believe that many people could keep a secret?
ChosunOne302 2 years ago
And to keep that secret for 40 years. That is beyond astounding.
Surely that points to a Delusional disorder or other mental illness.
LindaStevensBZ 1 year ago
The dots or landing sites might just be unmanned landing sites or digitaly put there. Please look at all the evidence before being so sure. I thought we had been to the moon for 38 year before looking at all the evidence
SIMONBRUCESIMON 2 years ago
We went there, my University had several connections that prove it, we had our own S-Band receivers and recorded telemetry as well as voive transmissions, and as well a physics "demonstration" rather than an experiment compared time vectors in differing distortion fields, earth & moon both distort time as well as space with their mass, via reflective radio transmissions we were able to "ping" the spacecraft & compare chronometers, the results were as predicted, You couldn't possibly fake that.
cornskid 2 years ago
Even before this, you had to be pretty damn ignorant or stupid to believe that the moon landings were a hoax. There was already plenty of undeniable evidence for them being real.
So not even pictures like this, and not even a trip to the moon to take a look themselves, would convince these less gifted hoax believers.
realisticHomeboy 2 years ago
Debunked video, small dots who was there long time before apollo "landed"
xismxist 2 years ago
95% of the Hardcore Hoax Believers are just frustrated losers. Most are loners with no friends, no jobs, no girlfriends and no real prospects for anything positive to become of their lives. Totally insignificant...but with their keyboard on YT, they feel like they matter.
They think they will be a big hero by uncovering the secret. LOL!
None will ever advance much beyond assistant manager at Taco Bell.
Funny, yet kinda sad that people can be so gullible.
LindaStevensBZ 2 years ago 3
LindaSBZ, they are self-absorbed fools, thinking they are smarter than 40 years worth of physicists, top engineers, and geologists.
Rob260259 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ces photos sont inutiles et ne prouvent rien du tout. Encore un bidonnage ridicule de la Nasa, tout les gens bien informés et honnêtes ne se font depuis longtemps aucune illusion sur ces conneries de cowboys. Allez au cinéma, on fait beaucoup mieux en images et vidéos de synthèse.
Ingénieur de la Nasa tournez la page et faites nous rêver avec des projets d'intérrêt public, ou recyclez-vous dans l'écologie ou l'humanitaire.
notgoodeenaf 2 years ago
Where'd you go? Please come back and play.
philwebb59 2 years ago
Another great video!
watch?v=TuBgGjXNVlM
.
Rob260259 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The evidence of a hoax is crushing. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. To see it, google "The Naked Scientist". In the "New Theories" section there's a thread entitled "Did we land on the moon?". The post is on page 15. It's the 7th one from the top.
Cosmored3 2 years ago
Thank you David for all your efforts. Thank you for your 'revealing truthseeking investigations'. I guess you will be interviewed by scientific forums and engineering platforms very soon now.
Rob260259 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The people who get interviewed are the people who make those videos and write those articles. All I did was make a collection of them.
If you think the evidence I posted on that forum doesn't show fakery, why don't you go to the forum and debate it? There's no character limit there so it'll be easier.
Cosmored3 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ah... you are a modest man David.
I will take a look at the forum.
Please, take a look at my new video:
watch?v=CSnEGAG1qa0
Rob260259 2 years ago
@Rob260259 where are these super clear pics that were supose to be out almost a yr ago? All that talk, and just that talk, about how much clearer the evidence was going to be. So where is it? U claim it was going to be undisputable. It's very easy to dispute NO EVIDENCE WHAT SO EVER.
cheerdiver 1 year ago
@cheerdiver
Who said there were going to be super clear pictures? What do you expect? The LRO camera reading the license plate of the LM? Do you watch CSI and JamesBond a lot?
Do you know how a narrow angle camera with 8" aperture works?
Rob260259 1 year ago
@Rob260259 I know DOD/NASA claims to have taken pics of "date stamped on a quarter" from 300mi above earth. I also know lunar orbit is 60mi, so how come the pics aren't 25x sharper?? (distance sq for 2 demention) Just like to indisputable evidence, I know ur a smart guy thats why I didnt ask somee1 else.
Really I am board and looking for an argument lol.
did U ever find the calcs for UHF (sony style) whisker diameter?
cheerdiver 1 year ago
@cheerdiver
Obviously you know shit. The LRO is not in 60miles orbit. I wonder what your source is on that 'DOD/NASA' story...
Do you still have that Yagi? I think that would be the best, with the elements diameter at between .001and .02 of the wavelength you want. A quarter wave for 579.25 works out to 4.85 inches I believe?
Rob260259 1 year ago
@Rob260259 Ooohoo, a little testy today. Yea Idamit the DOD/NASA story sound a bit (maybe alot) exaggerated, it only served to bolser my argument. But plz tell me how off my orbits are?? Do U consider my area calcs to be off, as in how much clearer pics should b?
I actually took down the yagi this wk, salvaged the balum for the sony style I hope to build. Being from Europe is that cm, we Americans are still in the bacward Std measure, LOL.
cheerdiver 1 year ago
Well, the LRO is orbitting at about 31 miles (50 kilometers) altitude, for one year I believe. I'm running out of time right now, so have a look at w w w . nasa . gov / lro and learn all about the mission. Believe me, it's great to read it all.
Rob260259 1 year ago
'new' theories?
By the look of it you have just reposted a large bunch of tired old ones.
There is nothing crushing or even vaguely interesting there.
ytmoog 2 years ago 8
I dont think there is going to be a way to convince thses moon hoaxers that we have been there. Short of strapping their ass to a rocket and sending them there to see for themselves. It seems conspirators are like cockroaches they never go away there will always be jfk conspiracies, moon hoax conspiracies, 9-11 conspiracy theories. I think there are even conspiracies about the lincoln assassination.
thecandidate0607 2 years ago
Damn right Candidate! The fact about conspiracy theories is that is what they are; theories. Anyone can start one and there are always some delusionals that follow 'the leader'.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Even that would not be enough. They would find a way to make that into a hoax also.
realisticHomeboy 2 years ago
You're right. There is always some excuse. More than that it should also say something that there is a conspiracy theory for every major even in human history. Apparently man has accomplished nothing it was just the governing bodies making it appear that way. lol
thecandidate0607 2 years ago
@ytmoog there is nothing couse ur areterded gaywad who dosent know what his looking at
ABOSOLUTEKNOWLEDGE 1 year ago
Cosmored3, looking forward to seeing you get your Pulitzer prize -- you know, the one that has eluded ambitious journalists and authors for the last 40 years, that would have been a slam dunk for anyone exposing Apollo as a hoax. Finally, you have arrived.
Like I said before, I didn't see a New Theories section. I'll take the time to read it if I can find it, but since we DID, in FACT, go to he moon, I'm not expecting much.
"Crushing?" What a crock!
Astrobrant2 2 years ago 9
@Astrobrant2 Apollo program is not a hoax, it's a real imposture. No respectable scientist can accept what is presented to public as real footage of the Apollo spacecrafts. It's so chidly, poor puppets manipulated. The LRO camera's are good enough to give, on the fly, perfect videos of landing sites. My friends, wait long to have access to these. NASA has a thorn in the side, hard to remove. Would be better now to tell the truth, and unveil the real facts.
degrangier 1 year ago
@degrangier Did you mean to say it is *not* a hoax? The entire rest of your comment demonstrates your belief that it is.
What would be your position if every single thing you thought was evidence against Apollo was actually ill-informed BS and was totally explainable?
Can you tell us why you think the spacecrafts and personnel looked manipulated? You might be surprised to find that there are perfectly legitimate and accurate explanations regarding your impressions -- things you DIDN'T KNOW.
Astrobrant2 1 year ago
Cosmored3..? Three..? Why? Is only one Cosmored not enough?
Rob260259 2 years ago
Buy the fear. CIT will not go BK.
EGMAG 2 years ago
Is this the best that NASA (Never A Straight Answer) can do with the latest new and improved version of Photoshop...show us an over exposed bright pixelated image? Well that's proof enough for me that we sent men to the moon...ROFLMAO!!!!
fanbutton 2 years ago
"show us an over exposed bright pixelated image"
Try a mirror Fanbutton.
It's game, set & match for the hoax. The LRO has most of the moonhoax conspiracists sinking in the swamp of ignorance.
Rob260259 2 years ago
pathetic myth defending drone!
this as much bullshit as anything else NAZA does.
they have ZERO credibility...they only fool the ones who
D R O O L...
wsee 2 years ago
Here's another 'best of' Fan. See if you can insist your hoax.
Rob260259 2 years ago
All I can say is, if you seriously believe this BS then you will, undoubtedly believe anything.
Hey I think hear Santa Claus coming....let me get stockings on the fireplace quick!
fanbutton 2 years ago
That's indeed all you can say. You will have to keep your faith ofcourse. It's all you have probably.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Don't watch Fanbutt. Try not to!
watch?v=QaORi3JP-Og&feature=related
Rob260259 2 years ago
ADULT SANTA CLAUS SYNDROME IS
T R E A T A B L E.
A.S.C.S. is known to affect one in 666 individuals. While those numbers might not sound frightening, we here at OPTOBIOGENETIX urge you to take our (now in clinical testing) A.S.C.S. vaccine...
GET THE JAB!!!
no more wankin