when she wasn't dressed as nice, not only was she around less people, but she was also acting as if she was crazy.. If she had acted the same for both of her disguises, she may have gotten better results.
Think of the underlying law of nature. The way of all things.
Consider its astounding inferences and implications.
The single, underlying law ... of nature! Not merely of physics, chemistry, psychology, biology, etc., but of all known fields of inquiry. The law we can all relate to, identify, understand and apply.
Ask yourself. What is the underlying law of nature?
Delight in the question. Have fun in the process of finding the answer firsthand for yourself.
Esentially, It's called social-prejudice. Most people prejudge others and everything; this means they are only reflecting their inside, which means their scope of the world is extremely limited, hence their limited ability to solve obstacles.
Each thinks about others or everything based on what she or he has inside; thus she or he cannot offer more.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
most people didnt help in a second outfit because she looked like a homeless crack whore.. and the guy that actually helped her is desperate and would tap anything hey look at the crackhead she looks easy enough uahauahuahauhauhaua
This provides a good example of how to conduct a naturalistic experiment. The woman varied her appearance to see if it might change the helpfulness of passersby to assist her in picking up items that she dropped. The only issue is that it appeared that she was at the same location on the same day for both parts of the experiment so some people might have picked up on the fact that it wasn't a "real" situation.
this is kind of a one sided experiment... if you noticed the nicer dressed version the girl was around WAY more people than the skanky white trash one...
WOW.
sussanaweljones 1 month ago
Thats sad...
AstroMen2911 5 months ago
when she wasn't dressed as nice, not only was she around less people, but she was also acting as if she was crazy.. If she had acted the same for both of her disguises, she may have gotten better results.
trueidahogangsta 1 year ago
3:45 I was waiting for him to take off running with her stuff.
blanknot 1 year ago
nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!
toobaaaapi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Think of the underlying law of nature. The way of all things.
Consider its astounding inferences and implications.
The single, underlying law ... of nature! Not merely of physics, chemistry, psychology, biology, etc., but of all known fields of inquiry. The law we can all relate to, identify, understand and apply.
Ask yourself. What is the underlying law of nature?
Delight in the question. Have fun in the process of finding the answer firsthand for yourself.
Google it, as a start.
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Esentially, It's called social-prejudice. Most people prejudge others and everything; this means they are only reflecting their inside, which means their scope of the world is extremely limited, hence their limited ability to solve obstacles.
Each thinks about others or everything based on what she or he has inside; thus she or he cannot offer more.
jjojjorge 2 years ago
Comment removed
jjojjorge 2 years ago
anyone notice that as soon as one person comes and helps, everyoe else comes and helps?
FALLinLOVEwithME 2 years ago 6
yeah, its actually called the bystander effect.
People are less likely to provide needed help in large groups.
richi1173 2 years ago
its only becuase shes hot
mpd19666 2 years ago
@FALLinLOVEwithME now that's a good observation ;-) human behavior !!
F0LL0WTHEWHITERABBIT 6 months ago
very interesting. Well done :)
nalapaws 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
most people didnt help in a second outfit because she looked like a homeless crack whore.. and the guy that actually helped her is desperate and would tap anything hey look at the crackhead she looks easy enough uahauahuahauhauhaua
dmineiro01 3 years ago
dmineiro01's post is a great example of pre-judging.
jjojjorge 2 years ago
This provides a good example of how to conduct a naturalistic experiment. The woman varied her appearance to see if it might change the helpfulness of passersby to assist her in picking up items that she dropped. The only issue is that it appeared that she was at the same location on the same day for both parts of the experiment so some people might have picked up on the fact that it wasn't a "real" situation.
staffordson 3 years ago 2
this is kind of a one sided experiment... if you noticed the nicer dressed version the girl was around WAY more people than the skanky white trash one...
littlenicky24 3 years ago 7
did you know craig grumet??
shizzit124 4 years ago
It's tricky
Juures 4 years ago
I guess males would be more hostile then females because males are naturally possessive.
AstroMen2911 4 years ago
I wouldn't help because of that fear that the other person may be hostile. Looks don't matter. It's the way a person was raised.
AstroMen2911 4 years ago
well I know more about humanity now....thanks haha
robwhitesays 4 years ago