RON PAUL IS REPUBLICAN PRETENDING TO BE LIBERTARIAN. REPUBLICANS OPENED EYES TO SOVIET UNION , THANKS TO REAGAN, NOW RUSSIA IS BECOMING CAPITALISTIC COUNTRY. REPUBLICANS DISRESPECTED US DOLLAR, THEY FOCUS ON A LEWINSKI DRESS, EUROPE GATHERED TOGETHER AND CREATED EUROS. RON PAUL WANTS TO TURN USA IN TO PUSSY COUNTRY. RON PAUL WAKE UP OLD FART , TALIBAN STONES WOMEN TO DEATH AND RAPES LITTLE GIRLS, THATS WHY THEY DONT WANT SCHOOLS THERE. RON PAUL IS 100% REPUBLICAN . BUSH DESTROYED TWIN TOWERS!
Hey, check out my Ron Paul vs Lincoln video. If you don't believe in secession, then you believe in slavery, for you are for enslaving people to a government that they want no part of:
dang, i just read Napolitanos 7 lies book today, excellent, insightful. I totally forgot that he is a Fox news contributor. I use to watch fox until I figured out myself that it is biased, propoganda. So, im totally surprised...hmmm. Still; Napolitano seems like a real dude, but those fox guys...i only liked Tony Snow from there
Almost every politician should be impeached for treason, but since all the Supreme Court justices are picked by the globalists, that will never happen. People who support Paul and not neocons or Marxists.
@xso61673 I've been reaching out to my Democratic friends who are not happy with Obama and I think every Ron Paul supporter should do the same. I've convinced a number of them to take a serious look at Ron Paul and some have even said they will change parties to Republican so they could vote in the primary. This is BIG, we need to spread the word to Dems that Ron Paul will end these wars and bring our troops home. They need to switch to Republican three months before their primary.
Just ask your family and friends to do the same and we'll win this thing. Tell mom that you have done the research and that she should trust that you have the families values and best interest at heart. Appeal to her skills in raising you and that she should trust you.
Or prove to Dad how much in means and start mowing his lawn between now and election day to get his vote
Remember the public have been treated so badly they are appathetic, lets use that appathy to our advantage
Obama's a member of the Council on Foreign Relations in Manhattan whose founder, nonogenarian David Rockefeller [grandson of John D. Rockefeller, of Standard Oil {1839-1937}], has stated that the goal of C.F.R. is to create a 1-world govt. McCain, Cheney, the Clintons & Bushes are members of C.F.R. & ascribe to Rockefeller's philosophy.
I am all with you, but yer scaring the shit out of people. I wish that the govt was like a movie and everyone was in on it, and theres connections here, here and here. Its more of a philosophy of govt role than a sinister conspiracy.
Ron Paul said Lincoln was wrong to use force to stop slavery. Thats what the man said. Therefore, he puts a state's right to have slavery -- even though he himself is against slavery -- over anyone's right to stop slavery.
In other words -- Paul claims states can have slavery, and no one can stop them.
Responding to this one: Not can have. Could have. Ron Paul's not calling for a return to slavery, so what's it matter to you MDC? So, he believes the states had the right to do those things; that's just his interpretation of the Constitution. It doesn't make him a bad candidate for president.
You act like Ron Paul is horrible because of it, but the truth is, it can't hurt anyone that he believes that way. The whole matter is in the past.
If he says that we aught to return to slavery, he'll lose all of his votes, so really, you have nothing to worry about, MarkDouglasC. He can't hurt anyone but the lobbyists.
True... but the alternative to Ron Paul doesn't look pretty. Either John McCain, who supports interference with whatever countries we darn well please, or Obama, who's made no real accomplishment and is relying on "character" to get elected.
So, Ron Paul believes it could have been solved without force. That's one of the few things I disagree with Ron Paul on. (After Bleeding Kansas and Fort Sumter, it's pretty clear there was nothing anyone could have done to stop the Civil War.)
I disagree with McCain on his foreign policy, and that's a big issue. I disagree with Obama on abortion, gun control, and "separation of church and state" and those concern our freedoms of religion and right to defend ourselves.
And I disagree with Ron Paul about a history book.
Yes, and force wasnt used to stop slavery at the start. The force -- the war -- was there anyway, started by the south. Lincoln would have been an idiot not to end slavery when it became possible to do so BECAUSE of the force, the war.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
No Ron Paul isnt horrible, sorry if I gave that impression. I like Paul on some things -- honesty, and he knows we can't borrow our way to prosperity. Slavery is in the past -- but understanding who has rights is not. People have rights. States are constructs in your head. I'd rather have someone more intelligent about such things than Dr. Paul
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
None. I never said they would. Dr Paul is anti slavery. But if a state decided to enact slavery -- he thinks no one has a right to use force to stop that. I think a lot of people have a right to use force to stop it - including the slaves themselves.
Perhaps the slaves and the people have those rights, but then again, that's the debate between Federalists and--I think-- Democratic-Republicans that goes WAY back in time; whether the states aught to have more rights or the Federal government. That goes back to Jefferson, Madison and Washington. That's one of the debates that formed our Constitution!
This leaves it open to debate, which, I believe, is exactly what the Founding Fathers wanted. Because I believe--and I don't know how many other people watching this video believe this--but I believe that this nation was "conceived in Liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." I believe this nation was created free.
That's a slippery slope right there. First of all, Ron Paul would be considered a Libertarian on most of his views. He believes that people should have the freedom to do as they please so long as it does not infringe on others personal freedoms. So since slavery forces people into a submissive state, Ron Paul would not allow any state to grossly cause any such injustices to an individuals freedom. Please, make your arguments logical.
This wacked out Judge is an idiot. Strange, cause he looks so smart on Court TV.
This idiot judge rails against Lincoln suspending Habeaus -- here is a clue you moron. The constitution SAYS you can suspend it you idiot in "times of rebellion"
What the futt do you think the civil war was you idiot? It was rebellion. So Lincoln had the RIGHT and DUTY to suspend it -- read the constitution.
Hey MrZ: Pictures of tapeworms on bogus paper & tin is long obsolete. Free, conscious individuals love gold. When I was your age it was $35./oz. (Alas, "woulda', shoulda', coulda'," ...) Check out the 'Mandrake Mechanism.'
Yes pauld..., this is most certainly one uncommon judge! Perhaps he'd make a great V.Prez., (or Prez. eh?)
7. Society's anomalies would die a quick death if we lived high-self esteem lives of moral effort & human creativity. That is THE POINT, (& his) & I don't believe you are too chimp to get it, (but I am almost there.) Instead U shill for low effort, low self-esteem perpetrating, productivity-squashing, favoured-monopoly creating, back-scratching, palm-gracing legislation & regulation, backed by loaded 45's under infinitely growing piles of talmudic paper.
8. They have succeeded in making U an impotent dependent. Your new Mommy & Daddy now take what you earn by-weekly, & treat you like a mushroom; that's why you act so dumbed-down. We here in Red Canaduh have a comedy folk show, called "Rick Mercer Visits America"; & you, MDC, are a fantastic candidate.
9. Ghettos: why don't you have them legislated against, w/ your easy means to panacea, MDC? If only it were that easy, eh? Fact is, it doesn't work, or there would be no problems, the Soviets would have flourished, Kennedy & MLK Jr. would still be alive, & we wouldn't need Visa, & even U know it, (though it scares U s******s to understand that Dr Uncle Sam is absolutely correct in all he says & writes.) Perhaps you worked for America's new Mommy & Daddy, helping them destroy values.
10. In fact, gov't results are always conspiratorial in creating problems where none previously existed; for that is the explicit, usurpatory purpose of the police/lawyer/judge/politician co-op called gov't. On the warmongering lawyer Abe Lincoln, get it right: see the 1:03 min Youtube vid, "Ron Paul on the American Civil War." His whole library is online, ya' know; there's much to learn from Dr. Uncle Sam.
11. Simply put, Dr. Paul would dismember the force-backed super-state collective that has made U so dependent that U can't think for yourself. Albeit painful, recognize that in "das Fadherland," your new Mom & Dad's default to aggressive initiatory force, threat, or coercion U so love is an immoral, primitive, cave-man tactic, intended to garner collective power in an easy, unconscious, lazy man's fashion, rather than earning it through hard effort.
12. Through out-competing, & thereby rewarding every productive person's hard-earned efforts, by producing superior, life-lifting net values, (as only free, creative, & voluntary business marketing by the super-competing upstart can,) the value-destroyers are shown the door. Will U have to go through that door, MDC? Is that why U are so reflexive against "Dr. No?" Remember MDC, today's "Screw the neighbours!" is the same as tomorrow's "Screw the grand kids!"
Shut up Bestmountjoy. Nobody's listening and you're not making any sense.
MarkDouglas, I wasn't saying Lincoln did anything wrong... I was just asking if Lincoln believed there was something Constitutionally wrong with his making slavery illegal. I personally admire the man. I agree with his decision to end slavery.
I would have done the same, regardless of the Constitution, but did the Constitution say something against what he did?
Sorry Bestmountjoy. I really shouldn't have said that. I take it back, because I was wrong.
Anyways, Mark Douglas, I watched the video. Ron Paul did NOT say that he wanted slavery to continue. He just said there were better ways of ending it. I don't understand where you got that he wants black children to be raped and sold, because he never said that! EVER!
You do know that the North won, and as such, the North has written the history books.
The one who wins the war is the one who writes the history books.
Look at Napoleon. Napoleon rose to power because the people were tired of the monarchs' tyranny. At this point, the monarchs were all allying against any rebellions in Europe. They were heartlessly suppressing the people.
They were ten times worse than Napoleon would ever have been.
But look at how the history books paint Napoleon. It's a given that Napoleon was a power-hungry, insane dictator.
The same thing could have happened with the North. I assume you have overlooked the fact that, in that era, factories were as bad as the cotton plantations.
Children had no choice but to work in the factories, or else their families would starve. The factories took heavy, heavy tolls on the workers' bodies. This was when there was no limitation to industry, and the industries enslaved the working class of the North.
I'm not defending slavery, I'm just saying that the Civil War was not necessarily the fight of good vs. evil.
It was evil vs. evil.
Lincoln chose his side. Apparently Ron Paul would have chosen another. Like General Lee; He disapproved of slavery, but when the time came to choose between two evils, he chose the South.
The choice was impossibly difficult back then. You can't paint one side as being the good guys! That would dishonor the courage and valiance of their opponents.
U are a big man of honesty! Thanks for the thought. Accepted.
I just wish we Canucks had a Dr. Ron Paul to work toward; I'd quit my job & volunteer; Hee! Of course, the r3volution is needed here too, so I labor ~ that the momentum continues to build towards our direction (I'd love to get that lazy old bag & all her progeny off our valueless currency.)
You're trying to get Queen Elizabeth 2 off your money? It never occurred to me how much of a nuisance it would be to have someone else's Queen on your money. Good luck!
Of course Paul doesnt say he wants slavery you idiot -- I never said he did.
Try to grasp this. He says NO ONE has a right to STOP slavery if a state wants it. He puts the states rights to have slavery -- even if slavery is wrong -- above anyone elses right to stop it.
The states did have the right, okay? I know it seems unfair to you, but there's a lot of unfair things in this world protected by the law.
Take Bill Gates. He made a fortune by monopolizing the computer industry. He was in charge of Microsoft spying on Apple and stealing one of their genius ideas before it was even introduced to the market (which, might I add, made Microsoft rich.)
That doesn't make him a criminal. That doesn't mean we can just blast his door down and take all of his money.
The top people in the California Teachers Association give themselves EXTREMELY expensive summer vacations, courtesy of the teachers off of whose paychecks they get deducted. Anyone on the board who says anything against them gets kicked out so he/she can't say anymore.
But nobody has the right to plant bombs under these people's vacation homes.
13. Of course, the weak, unsubstantiated, "WWE ego's" that love easy power would squash him, & then get all the hypnotized & fluoridated MDC's all over to believe this is the new meaning of "free enterprise." Well, there you have it; but rather than change the meaning of words, lets call a spade a spade; this is not "free-enterprise" but rather, "regulated red economics in New Red America." And this I know much better than U do, MDC; I'm in Red Canaduh, & this is old to us.
14. Here I have the pleasure of 6 mth. socialist line ups in health care, where competition from private industry is outlawed, (just like yours will become without a Prez. Paul.) Then, because everything is on the public purse, they can justify getting heavy handed in all things; try riding a bicycle w/out a helmet in this place & you will meet up with big brother protecting you from yourself with one hand in your pocket, & a tazer in the other. That is surely moronic, U are right on that one.
15. This is your "coercion" by "laws" MDC, in all of its burgeoning, moronic glory. Man, evolve out of it! Your kid's happiness is now at stake. Not a good time for frivolity & play w/ unsubstantial assertions.
Since U inaccurately, pathologically, reduce us to being so dark & evil, I wonder how U rationalize how these very same morons ("everyone," U believe) can be entrusted with our lives thru their feared guns &fists-backed laws.
16. Further, U holds that these same morons can be counted on to create a "system of laws" that somehow magically; automatically work to protect us against themselves that make them? Yeah, right! That's rich! And I have an igloo lottery to sell you here. Would U understand Dr. Paul's "Congress Straight Talk" docs, like "Political Power and the Rule of Law," of February 5, 2007? Easy default to monopoly-creating legislation is the lazy man's panacea, MDC.
17. Truly creative upstarts will inevitably out-compete the lazy, incompetent morons U call yourself & all Earthlings. Even now, regulated, un-free, limited competition is what keeps GM somewhat honest against Toyota, & Gates honest against Linux, or S. Jobs at Apple. And Nike honest against Reebok. If we had true "free-enterprise", your country would have built an oil refinery since 1978, & further, gasoline would be used only to run vintage cars, since replaced by better upstart technology.
18. And, maybe U would no longer have worries of cancer, headaches, or any other disease. Perhaps, the matchbox U live in would be totally self-sustained. But no; thanks to your beloved morons, U have none of that. But they can still count on dumb U to shill for them; as long as they can keep U believing in the Easter bunny, about them hopping up to be there "for you," (the "free" American,) with their artificial basket of "checks & balances." Methinks U should turn off the TV you saw that on.
19. You heard it here first, MDC: Zion's DC is the new Hollywood. Just ask the "checks & balances" hominids behind 911 who run the New York Freemason's beaver lodge. MDC, even through your confusion, your intuition knows you've got Email from out of the great ether that you need to look at. For instance, see Youtube, "Ron Paul supporters look out for HR. 1955" among thousands of others. I remain, honestly in hope against hope, for your awakening.
You moronic Lincoln haters should thank Lincoln every day of your lives. Without Abe, USA would have broken apart years ago, and world history would have been drastically different. Nazis would have won WW2, because the south would have supported Hitler, if they could. And your sorry asses would have been punk slaves for Japs and Germans.
Lincoln didn't end slavery by himself. Congress and the people passed the 13th Amendment -- you may have heard of that.
Lincoln wisely and legally ended slavery only in the states that were under marshal law, then he caused slavery to end all over by personally getting the 13th Amendment through congress, just one day before he was killed
Whats with Rand talk? This is about the Judge and Paul, both of whom think states can damn well have slaves, rape the slaves, and sell your OWN children from those rapes into slaver -- if you wanna. These idiots think states have more rights that people.
I got news for you punks - states are a fucking figment of your imagination, a construct in your fucking head. People are real. These pukes just use term "states rights" to justify their own greedy hateful souls.
Ron Paul said Lincoln had no reason or right to stop the states from having slaves. Bullshit. The fucking STATES had no rights enslaving people. If Lincoln had no reason or right to stop slavery -- then Paul is also saying it was okay for states to have that slavery. Ron Paul is a punk, the more you find out what the scum bucket has stood for, the worse he seems. He toned down his crazy ass rhetoric to run for president, but he is still a crazy loon bastard who would allow slavery
When did Ron Paul say Lincoln had no right? But if he did, Lincoln himself did say he had no right, in a way, didn't he? He said he went into the war not to end slavery, but to "preserve the union"
Wasn't it only after Gettysburg that he realized that the war would only break out again unless he overstepped his boundaries and made owning slaves illegal?
Lincoln didnt start the war, but once the moron slave raping macho ducks in the south started it, Lincoln wisely used the war to do some good.
The south essentially was like a Nazi nation, till the civil war. No freedom of speech, racial superiority, white men could kill blacks, rape blacks, sell their own children from those rapes. Even Nazis didn't sink that low. Lincoln ended that shit. Good.
Part 19/19: So until after 2012, due to your avid personal preponderance toward destruction of persons, freedom & values (a common trait of unfree-market, legislature-lobbying, guns & fists backed, anti-civilized, fascist collectivists, whatever their stripe) & the learning before U, until at least then, I no longer volunteer association nor discussion with your incorrect self. MDC, is your last name "Cheney," or "Clinton?"
Part 18/19: Instead, perhaps you'll move toward a code of peaceful voluntarism, goodwill, & net value production as in the Constitution. Rand's books are still great teachers ~ selling well; Tarbell peaked at the mere 1911 inconveniencing of Rockefeller.
As for "history," (speaking of "objective, wide-scope history") Alex Jones' can help U out with some of that in a very few short weeks. I'm excited for U; don't let your naïve trust in criminal hegemony blow the growth opp. you so need.
Part 17/19: Indeed, at least one of Miss Rand's characters, "Dagny Taggart," is authoritatively considered to be specifically mentored after Tarbell. Though you are now almost inextricably tangled & lost in your own personal existentialist mysticism, it would fill you with joy to have a regime change between your ears ~ away from imitating your "leader's" default to initiatory force, its threat, or other immoral coercion as a means of dealing with others.
Part 16/19: I suggest you start with Nathaniel Brandon (the father of the term "self-esteem") for a year's primer on civilized behaviour. Then follow up with a year or two of learning the concentration required to comprehend Ayn Rand's forward-looking words as they perform loop-d'-loops around any of your muckraking Tarbell-ism's. After that, learn from the master of "laissez-faire," Ludwig vonMises; or the John Birch Society, if you can 'no-comprende' Dr. Paul's new book.
Part 15/19: You, MDC, have got one hell of a lot of reading to do if you want to compete; as your reflex default toward crying for fascist gov't guns & fists "controls," & using venom are now obsolete to your survival.
Are you a fan of Ida's great text "The Business of Being a Woman" or "The Ways of Woman" & do you admire Mussolini as she did? Perhaps you labored for the lobby-backed Haliburton/Standard Oil style of "free enterprise?"
Part 14/19: MDC, it seems you'll continue to sacrifice all to 0.75% GNP centralized-banking growth, until you can't eat anymore w/ out "leadership" to hold your spoon. You think Butsh, Hitlery, Obamanation or Mcgain are trustworthy. Man, whose payroll are U on?
One day, you must step up to compete on your own value's merits as an individual. Your laughable, vacuous, shrill clanging will not stop the coming epoch of benevolence that Dr. Paul & we self-leaders are ushering.
Part 13/19: >"Today's politico/religio/mainstream lobby [white-collar hoax] collectivization has produced un-free [monopolistic, big-legislature lobbying, regulated] economies, where[in] upstarts [are forced to] fail."
I rest my case. You are incompetent for business; for you are a gov't loving, dependent, collectivist in need of a big-brother to babysit you. You put it best, AttunedFlux.
Part 12/19: Do you think coercion is a moral trait, marking a civilized people; to have them monopolized by the lowest common force-backed hominid? Do you think Butsch or your value-destroying puppet gov't gives a dadgum about setting competition honest? Pick up your knuckles & evolve out of it, man! I suggest you read for full understanding before you go online throwing up all over the place. It's sad to witness your unsubstantiated prurient "writhings."
Yeah coercion of some sort is necessary, aka laws. Since you have shown that all men would be fucking tyrants, if they could - yes, you need laws. You need rational checks and balances. Some of those checks and balances you could call "coersion" if you want. Or call it purple dog doo. What has allowed men to "evolve" is our limits on the evil bastards who would enslave others if they could -- and thats pretty much fucking all of us.
Part 13/19: >"Today's politico/religio/mainstream lobby [white-collar hoax] collectivization has produced un-free [monopolistic, big-legislature lobbying, regulated] economies, where[in] upstarts [are forced to] fail."
I rest my case. You are incompetent for business; for you are a gov't loving, dependent, collectivist in need of a big-brother to babysit you. You put it best, AttunedFlux.
Part 12/19: Do you think coercion is a moral trait, marking a civilized people; to have them monopolized by the lowest common force-backed hominid? Do you think Butsch or your value-destroying puppet gov't gives a dadgum about setting competition honest? Pick up your knuckles & evolve out of it, man! I suggest you read for full understanding before you go online throwing up all over the place. It's sad to witness your unsubstantiated prurient "writhings."
Part 11/19: By default, legislature-backed anti-upstarts win of no worthy opponent. J-e-e-e-s-s-c-c-h! Left up to you to produce net value, & we'd all still be Fred & Wilma. Yea, I know, I'm the "idiot," Hee-he! I'm in friggin' red Canaduh; stay where U are, humanoid. There's enough of your kind here already, trying to get largesse of "business" out of the barrel of a gun in a marble & hors d'euvres, mcgain climate. Did you comprehend my word, "coercion" MDC? What do you think the word means?
Part 10/19: Reproduction, though rightfully voluntary, is not for the frivolous, MDC. There remains lots of unfinished business from that era, & your hominid, violent attitude is a living symptom of its un-suppressed, inherited fury.
You are no representation of how a typical yankee upstart behaves. Yet, as witnessed in your boring, impotent style of flaming discordianism, lil' wonder it takes a Standard Oil or a Mexican to bring something to market.
Part 9/19: Even though so severely encumbered by these European tapeworms & the maggoty conditions MDC so loves, the closest to a free-market totality as has yet existed on Earth, was the ensuing industrial revolution (greatest advance & growth on Earth yet.)
To date, you still owe that debt, by the way. And they want it back in return for your just-barely legal life. Which of your ill-considered entrenchments are U pushing onto your babies?
Part 8/19: Surely you are joking to even assert Earth has seen "free-enterprise" yet? That beautiful, fresh, life-lifting beginning started to promptly end before it even began in 1783, mrnarrow-history buff***, the year the kipper crown finally won the US revolution with nary a flint nor more Boston Pekoe tea wasted; after B. Franklin returned from Europe with the Declared "Independent" Union's beggings to finance its fledgling infrastructure.
Part 7/19: Do you figure these events comprised a free-market totality of conditions, MDC? To what is due your entrenchment in such dishonesty? In fact, when & where exactly have such conditions yet existed on planet Earth? The upstart James J. Hill's railways nearly ran themselves, by contrast. Doubt you even heard of him (read up on how your brand of legislature-gun "free-enterprise" monopolization squashed him too, histrionic man.)
Part 7/19: Do you figure these events comprised a free-market totality of conditions, MDC? To what is due your entrenchment in such dishonesty? In fact, when & where exactly have such conditions yet existed on planet Earth? The upstart James J. Hill's railways nearly ran themselves, by contrast. Doubt you even heard of him (read up on how your brand of legislature-gun "free-enterprise" monopolization squashed him too, histrionic man.)
Part 6/19: Do writer's read? Not ex-labor "wanna' be's", apparently. ... MDC, Tarbell would have voted for Dr. Ron Paul ~ as from Wikipedia: "... she accused the leaders of the Standard Oil Company of using unfair tactics to put her father and many small oil companies out of business." [opposers to her Daddy were all cozied in w/ your great grandfathers' generations-draining, force-backed, Washington-bleeding, bank-financed, snaking, inflatulatory, unprofitable railways.] "Free-competition?"
Part 5/19: Are your ideas not worthy of support from your own hand? I am wondering, "Is MDC's default here revealing his incompetence, his lazyness, his basic high "serf"-esteem, or is it pure envy? I think all four.
Tarbell came on strong after her upstart Dad was forced out by Standard Oil, after it "mated w/unnatural forces, threats, & coercions ~ against [him,] the out competing upstart, so [Standard] could garner onto itself unearned power over him." MDC's idea of "free-enterprise."
Part 4/19: To which I respond him w/ the following:
Perhaps you can cease with your default to ig-grunts & ad hominid slander long enough to substantiate your "idiocy." Then again, maybe you can't; I sense that I am witnessing a dense mass of aimless fury that merely stands upright with knees mostly locked, responding from weakness to raise the knuckles off the ground. Why else would you not contribute evidence for your insinuations?
Part 3/19: Mind ~ MDC means "use brute gov't force or threat" when he says "stop..." Is it that he doesn't feel as if he's already living in a state of "monopoly and slavery," or is it that he thinks the US has a "Totally free market you idiot?" He thinks the sleight-of-handed, big-business, Rockefellers are a result of "free-enterprise." He doesn't know what the word "upstart" means. But worse yet, he owns a vote. Egads!
Part 2/19: After I asked him to check his incorrect self on this (check back to my comment earlier Sunday for context) he flamed into my Youtube inbox, to quote:
"Competition my ass. Totally free market you idiot, leads to monopoly & slavery you idiot. Only when you stop monopolies, and have reasonable rules about labor, do you get competition you idiot. I suggest you read some fucking history you idiot, start with Ida Tarbell." Unquote.
Part 1/19: I wish to share my exchange w/ MarkDouglasC over the last couple of days. It will take a few log-ins to complete this thread, but stay tuned; I'll get it all in there. His profile says he wants to be a writer. He thinks that yesteryear's & today's legislature-lobbying, white-collar-hoax-complex-pandering, bought-off politicians-for-hire, (using their guns & fists empire to redirect & steal what they are not competent to earn, masked as "business") is called "free-enterprise."
Go Napolitano! Vote Ron Paul!!! The majority of Ron Paul's supporters are our own boys (millitary) as well. Whether democrat or republic, even non voters alike adore Ron Paul. He has the most consistent record of them all. Genuinely "for the people"
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Abe Lincoln didn't start the war you moron, the southern idiots who were showing off for some flappy titted women started it. Lincoln fought back. If Lincoln was such a bad ass -- why didn't he start the war? Why did he do everything he could to avoid it - and would never have fought, unless US was attacked.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The judge is a bigger idiot than Paul. Both morons think a state can have slaves, if they want to, and there isn't anything anyone can do -- by their idiot theory -- about it.
Lincoln was not a terrorist, he was only working for the wrong side. He thought that he was putting an end to slavery, when in reality, he was helping the corporations in the North gain monopolies.
Bollox, he was a railroad parasite himself and he had ZERO interest in slavery beyond hating blacks and wanting them deported. He used slavery like Bush used 'WMD', as an excuse. Read "The Real Lincoln" and educate yourself on this, because your school decieved you
monopolies are the natural result of totally free enterprise, and had nothing to do with Lincoln moron. The big trusts and monopolies came 40-80 years later, after Lincoln.
Fine, big industry. Or something. Because Lincoln was killed while rebuilding the South. Not while fighting the South.
And I know there were a lot of big industries in the North that wanted the South gone so that there was no competition for their goods.
It fits doesn't it? The North had him offed, didn't they? Opinions please... do you people think Lincoln's murder was organized by the South or the North?
Are you retarded? Lincoln's assination is one of the best known crimes in history. Southern scum were pissed as hell that Lincoln upset their little slave raping world. Lincoln wasn't rebuilding the south yet you idiot, the war had just ended. He had just completed getting the 13th Amendment through Congress.
Yeah, but another best known crime is that Lee Harvey Oswald was working alone when he shot Kennedy.
Which explains why Oswald was shot before testimony right?
And also perfectly explains the reason that Kennedy's brother was shot soon after that.
History books tell us Oswald was working alone, and the same history books tell us Booth was an angry southerner. I don't know. He could have been. But then again, some Northerners could have been helping him for their own reasons.
Please check this more thoroughly, lest someone thinks U have not advanced beyond some dem/lib paper or neo-con red school; U are incorrect. Competition is the result of totally free enterprise. Monopolization occurs when stagnating enterprise mates w/unnatural force, threat or coercion against the out competing upstart, to garner onto itself unearned favor against him. Today's politico/religio/mainstream lobby collectivization has produced un-free economies, where upstarts fail.
Competition my ass. Totally free market you idiot, leads to monopoly and slavery you idiot. Only when you stop monopolies, and have reasonable rules about labor, do you get competition you idiot.
I suggest you read some fucking history you idiot, start with Ida Tarbell.
Do you morons REALLY don't know the fucking history of Standard Oil -- and the other monopolies, and slavery, that came about under "free enterprise". Gesus you fucking people are dumb fucks about history.
Competition is a bitch -- ask the airlines, ask FORD and GM. IF airlines could - you fucking idiots -- they would merge and have a monopoly you idiot. Only laws and the courts can prevent monopolies. Learn some fucking history you fucking idiots.
You morons don't know crap. Yes, the Fed keeps issuing paper money -- but that's not some deep conspiracy you idiots. Thats what they GOTTA do, issue a lot of money, cause the wealthy hedge funds and wall street don't want to pay taxes like work pays. The only way to do that -- is to borrow. Borrow from China, and borrow from the fed, who just prints a bunch of money. Get mad at that.
Don't call people idiots ya douche bag. The feds don't GOTTA do nothing. THEY shouldn't even exist. The U.S. dollar is worthless if you're so smart. The only reason why it has any value at all is because the Middle East agreed to use our money to buy and trade goods and services. The moment this trade stops, it's all over. Take your liberal class warfare and tax hiking arse to another site.
i love how people say ron paul is a lier, racist, blah blah, can you even back that up? let me tell ever1 something ron paul is the only one being excluded, when one is excluded it's due to fear, the mass media is paid to exclude ron paul, i find this sad, in America, we exclude a candidate due to the truth? because he is for the constitution? wow, we are docile nation indeed
I feel so bad for him. Notice he didn't actual say I'm endorsing Ron Paul for the President of the United States. Why? Because as a Farce News analyst he is banned from endorsing any political figure directly.
Yea but u never know, i bet he would be a great VP. But im not RP so i wouldnt know who he would pick, but Napolitano ovbiously isnt an idiot like the others running for president. I forget which interview he did but he's not allowed to pick someone since he is in Fake News corp. He could also pick Pat Buchanan he likes paul im sure paul likes him too, but never know who'd he'd pick till he announces.
Yea and u never know, he could go across the isle and pick Kucinich, they are good friends. Although they would be very differnt on various ideas, but like Liberty and what not would be the same. Id probably get Kucinich for a cabinet or something like that position
Going For Gold moneybomb still needs over 3m to hit target by Feb 5th !! Please donate today. No amount is too small. Spread the word. ronpaul2008 dot com
Constitution is the bases of MLK's message. Government has been turning socialist and you sheeps don't realize it. Welfare and government subsidies = socialism. It destroys us minorities you idiots. Wake Up!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ron Paul is a nice old kook. He is like a cleaned up KKK anti jew, anti black, conspiracy wacko. He personally seems like a nice guy, who would of course be against bigotry, slavery. But the states rights principles he spews, and the strict construction crap, was the ONLY excuse for slavery. And was used to deny popular labor laws for DECADES. 1850-1910. Learn some history.
Wow you are a moron. Constitution was also pushed for fair labor laws. Don't only read into the corporate side of history you moron. Do your own research.
Ive read and studied about this most my life, amazed how peope can use any excuse like states rights as ONLY excuse to keep slavery. It was clear, they didnt care about states rights. Its always about power, prestige, or pussty. They just grab things like the constutition, or religion, or some phrase, as an excuse.
must are you mental? Really, are you? Constitution was "pushed" for fair labor laws? WTF, have you never read a book? Strict construction folks stopped labor laws for DECADES you moron. Corporations and the rich sure didnt want any labor laws. Let children be worked to death, let people die in unsafe working conditions. The USSC strict constructionist were helping the very rich screw workers, and America - for 100 years, you moron.
He has had a long association with the Ludwig von Mises Institute, a think tank based in Auburn, Alabama. The think tank was founded by Lew Rockwell, who served as Paul's congressional chief of staff from 1978 to 1982. Paul was the lead speaker at Lew Rockwell and the Mises Institute's 1995 conference on Secession from the United States: "We'll explore what causes [secession] and how to promote it."
MarkDouglasC is a fucking moron.... I'm sory that's incorrect. What I meant to say is that he is a dumbass motherfucking ignorant asshole piece of wet smelly dogshit who likes to get robbed blind by the shitholes who have fucked up America. Stupid bitch.
You morons that want to get rid of FED reserve -- be careful what you wish for, idiots. You dont have any idea what would happen. YOu have these looney idea what happened -- and no idea what might happen. Be careful morons.
ur a disallusioned fool markdouglas you have no idea what you are talking about get out of our country
only thing that woul happpen without fed reserve is that we wouldnt have to pay the government for secret groups and pay them for our tips and paychecks
how misguided are you friend. Research the history of our Central bank and the reasons they were established. Research How the FED is run and by whom. The purchasing power of the dollar is 4 cents as of now. The fed was the cause of the great depression and every bubble since.
Yes I agree the money supply is wacko -- we have let the gov print massive amounts of money, cheaping currency. But get a new boogieman. Dont blame some 800 year old conspiracy. The fed prints massive money - and borrows billions a day - cause the rich dont want to pay taxes. Work now pays 75% of the taxes, the unearned income now pays far less taxes. If we didnt print and borrow so much, the rich would have to pay more. They dont want to. Blame them.
You've got it all wrong. If the Federal Government didn't spend so much, we wouldn't have to print and borrow so much. That is where the blame lies. It's a cop out to blame rich people because the top 5% of wage earners already pay the lions share
The rich people pay crap. Two people, both make 100k-- who will pay the most tax? The one that worked for his 100K? Or the one that got it from cap gains? The worker will pay almost 300% higher taxes. The fact is, the wealthy refusal to pay their taxes is what makes us borrow, and print money.
Too bad we'll never know who owns the fed. One of the best kept secrets in the world. Interesting to ask as well when the last time our gold was accounted for...
Naturally this moron would support Paul -- he believes like Paul does -- that states can have slavery if they want it -- and the federal government has no right to stop it. The rights of the people who are raped, worked to death, sold, are nothing.
i mean, if there gonna pay someone to come on here and argue against ron paul. couldnt they atleast get someone with intelligence and strong argument points.
Fuck.Yeah.
MrChris4251 1 week ago
Paul / Napolitano 2012!
Restore the Republic!
MontagesnMore 3 months ago
I hope that Ron Paul will ask Judge Napolitano to run with him... and that the Judge will accept.
TheLibertyMinute 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ATTN EVERYBODY:
Like "Celebrity Endorsements for Ron Paul 2012" on facebook!
MrDeppness 5 months ago
RON PAUL IS REPUBLICAN PRETENDING TO BE LIBERTARIAN. REPUBLICANS OPENED EYES TO SOVIET UNION , THANKS TO REAGAN, NOW RUSSIA IS BECOMING CAPITALISTIC COUNTRY. REPUBLICANS DISRESPECTED US DOLLAR, THEY FOCUS ON A LEWINSKI DRESS, EUROPE GATHERED TOGETHER AND CREATED EUROS. RON PAUL WANTS TO TURN USA IN TO PUSSY COUNTRY. RON PAUL WAKE UP OLD FART , TALIBAN STONES WOMEN TO DEATH AND RAPES LITTLE GIRLS, THATS WHY THEY DONT WANT SCHOOLS THERE. RON PAUL IS 100% REPUBLICAN . BUSH DESTROYED TWIN TOWERS!
democratsaresmart 6 months ago
ron paul!!!
mg91006 7 months ago
No better way to endorse a politician.
TravistheHuman 11 months ago
Hey, check out my Ron Paul vs Lincoln video. If you don't believe in secession, then you believe in slavery, for you are for enslaving people to a government that they want no part of:
youtube.com/watch?v=oiH_XnqnyHU
ErikLiberty 1 year ago
this is the best video i have ever seen. Ron Paul changed my life.
ineyeseek 1 year ago
@ineyeseek .. Yes Dr Paul deprogrammed a lot of folks, got them thinking str8 ,, He is the man that carries (the red pill)...
JaxxBat 1 year ago 2
@JaxxBat i hear you! Ron Paul cured my apathy!
TheMethadoneParty 1 year ago
dang, i just read Napolitanos 7 lies book today, excellent, insightful. I totally forgot that he is a Fox news contributor. I use to watch fox until I figured out myself that it is biased, propoganda. So, im totally surprised...hmmm. Still; Napolitano seems like a real dude, but those fox guys...i only liked Tony Snow from there
tommyemiliano 1 year ago
@tommyemiliano .. Hear that.. ..I like John Stossel
JaxxBat 1 year ago
How exactly did Lincoln disrespect the Constitution, in the Judge's opinion?
JBeatty17 2 years ago
well south carolina was aloud to secede...the union was optional, and he made it mandatory
kommon12Cents 1 year ago
Suggestion bro: Why don't you Wikipedia "The Civil War" and Lincoln's "Suspending of Habeas Corpus"
mikealtan 1 year ago
@JBeatty17 suspending habeas corpus you tard
davibean 1 year ago
Obama needs to be impeached. I voted for Ron Paul in 08 and I'm voting for Ron Paul in 2012! GO RON PAUL
xso61673 2 years ago 43
And Bush should NOT have been impeached in your opinion?
JBeatty17 2 years ago
bush should get firing squad
projectreller 2 years ago 3
Almost every politician should be impeached for treason, but since all the Supreme Court justices are picked by the globalists, that will never happen. People who support Paul and not neocons or Marxists.
residentzombie 2 years ago 3
@xso61673 I've been reaching out to my Democratic friends who are not happy with Obama and I think every Ron Paul supporter should do the same. I've convinced a number of them to take a serious look at Ron Paul and some have even said they will change parties to Republican so they could vote in the primary. This is BIG, we need to spread the word to Dems that Ron Paul will end these wars and bring our troops home. They need to switch to Republican three months before their primary.
dmrutgos 4 months ago
@xso61673Great!
Just ask your family and friends to do the same and we'll win this thing. Tell mom that you have done the research and that she should trust that you have the families values and best interest at heart. Appeal to her skills in raising you and that she should trust you.
Or prove to Dad how much in means and start mowing his lawn between now and election day to get his vote
Remember the public have been treated so badly they are appathetic, lets use that appathy to our advantage
aussiedon8 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com
kwoodward80 2 years ago
<3 The judge <3 Ron Paul
staniscanner 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
not in a million years
tommyisirish 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
im angry
my messenger info is in my youtube profile! MSG me on M.S.N! XN
chicky123sb 3 years ago
r heart heart N
00148627 3 years ago
Obama's a member of the Council on Foreign Relations in Manhattan whose founder, nonogenarian David Rockefeller [grandson of John D. Rockefeller, of Standard Oil {1839-1937}], has stated that the goal of C.F.R. is to create a 1-world govt. McCain, Cheney, the Clintons & Bushes are members of C.F.R. & ascribe to Rockefeller's philosophy.
procommenter 3 years ago 28
just shutup.
I am all with you, but yer scaring the shit out of people. I wish that the govt was like a movie and everyone was in on it, and theres connections here, here and here. Its more of a philosophy of govt role than a sinister conspiracy.
tommyisirish 3 years ago
So what was the purpose of establishing the United Nations and Council on Foreign Relations then? The only answer is a global government.
residentzombie 2 years ago 2
Let hear ya say HELL YEAH!!!
lookingforghosts 3 years ago 10
5 S☆ars
000stryke3000 3 years ago 10
Ron Paul said Lincoln was wrong to use force to stop slavery. Thats what the man said. Therefore, he puts a state's right to have slavery -- even though he himself is against slavery -- over anyone's right to stop slavery.
In other words -- Paul claims states can have slavery, and no one can stop them.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Forget that last post. Sorry.
Responding to this one: Not can have. Could have. Ron Paul's not calling for a return to slavery, so what's it matter to you MDC? So, he believes the states had the right to do those things; that's just his interpretation of the Constitution. It doesn't make him a bad candidate for president.
You act like Ron Paul is horrible because of it, but the truth is, it can't hurt anyone that he believes that way. The whole matter is in the past.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
If he says that we aught to return to slavery, he'll lose all of his votes, so really, you have nothing to worry about, MarkDouglasC. He can't hurt anyone but the lobbyists.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
Id rather have someone in office that put the rights of people over the rights of "states" to have slavery if they want it.
States rights was always an excuse to have and keep slavery. The real reason they wanted slavery -- greed, and all the women they could rape.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
True... but the alternative to Ron Paul doesn't look pretty. Either John McCain, who supports interference with whatever countries we darn well please, or Obama, who's made no real accomplishment and is relying on "character" to get elected.
So, Ron Paul believes it could have been solved without force. That's one of the few things I disagree with Ron Paul on. (After Bleeding Kansas and Fort Sumter, it's pretty clear there was nothing anyone could have done to stop the Civil War.)
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
I disagree with McCain on his foreign policy, and that's a big issue. I disagree with Obama on abortion, gun control, and "separation of church and state" and those concern our freedoms of religion and right to defend ourselves.
And I disagree with Ron Paul about a history book.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
Yes, and force wasnt used to stop slavery at the start. The force -- the war -- was there anyway, started by the south. Lincoln would have been an idiot not to end slavery when it became possible to do so BECAUSE of the force, the war.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
True. According to history, the war was inevitable. And even though Lincoln is remembered as being the one who freed the slaves,
"If I could end the war without freeing a single slave, I would do so. If I could end the war and free all the slaves, I would do so."
His commitment was to ending the bloodshed between South and North.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No Ron Paul isnt horrible, sorry if I gave that impression. I like Paul on some things -- honesty, and he knows we can't borrow our way to prosperity. Slavery is in the past -- but understanding who has rights is not. People have rights. States are constructs in your head. I'd rather have someone more intelligent about such things than Dr. Paul
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Which state would make slavery legal again?
TehW00terMan 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
None. I never said they would. Dr Paul is anti slavery. But if a state decided to enact slavery -- he thinks no one has a right to use force to stop that. I think a lot of people have a right to use force to stop it - including the slaves themselves.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Perhaps the slaves and the people have those rights, but then again, that's the debate between Federalists and--I think-- Democratic-Republicans that goes WAY back in time; whether the states aught to have more rights or the Federal government. That goes back to Jefferson, Madison and Washington. That's one of the debates that formed our Constitution!
MrZaborskii 3 years ago 2
Comment removed
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
This leaves it open to debate, which, I believe, is exactly what the Founding Fathers wanted. Because I believe--and I don't know how many other people watching this video believe this--but I believe that this nation was "conceived in Liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." I believe this nation was created free.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
That's a slippery slope right there. First of all, Ron Paul would be considered a Libertarian on most of his views. He believes that people should have the freedom to do as they please so long as it does not infringe on others personal freedoms. So since slavery forces people into a submissive state, Ron Paul would not allow any state to grossly cause any such injustices to an individuals freedom. Please, make your arguments logical.
azjunglist05 3 years ago 6
Mr Zab well thats all interesting -- but what the heck does that have to do with the judge and habeaus and what we were talking about.
I never heard that Gates stole the idea for Windows.
Its true that the law can't make things fair - or I would have four big breasted blond women in my bed every night, competing for my attention.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
This wacked out Judge is an idiot. Strange, cause he looks so smart on Court TV.
This idiot judge rails against Lincoln suspending Habeaus -- here is a clue you moron. The constitution SAYS you can suspend it you idiot in "times of rebellion"
What the futt do you think the civil war was you idiot? It was rebellion. So Lincoln had the RIGHT and DUTY to suspend it -- read the constitution.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Hey MrZ: Pictures of tapeworms on bogus paper & tin is long obsolete. Free, conscious individuals love gold. When I was your age it was $35./oz. (Alas, "woulda', shoulda', coulda'," ...) Check out the 'Mandrake Mechanism.'
Yes pauld..., this is most certainly one uncommon judge! Perhaps he'd make a great V.Prez., (or Prez. eh?)
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Beautifully put by Mr. Napolitano.
pauldelacroix 3 years ago 4
Lets take our country back..Go Ron Paul..The Real change for Freedom loving Ameicans.
xsleef 3 years ago 7
This is what it's (REALLY) all about, Porgy...
/watch?v=X6b4YrXayzE
What's the difference between...
The [United States] & [The United States of America]
The [United States] is a federal corporation.
USC (United States Code) Title 28 § 3002: Definition (15).
The [United States] is located in the District of Columbia
UCC (Universal Commercial Code) Article 9, § 9-307. LOCATION OF DEBTOR (h).
[The United States of America] is a Federal Constitutional Republic" [of 50 sovereign REPUBLICS].
jobatta 3 years ago 3
7. Society's anomalies would die a quick death if we lived high-self esteem lives of moral effort & human creativity. That is THE POINT, (& his) & I don't believe you are too chimp to get it, (but I am almost there.) Instead U shill for low effort, low self-esteem perpetrating, productivity-squashing, favoured-monopoly creating, back-scratching, palm-gracing legislation & regulation, backed by loaded 45's under infinitely growing piles of talmudic paper.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
8. They have succeeded in making U an impotent dependent. Your new Mommy & Daddy now take what you earn by-weekly, & treat you like a mushroom; that's why you act so dumbed-down. We here in Red Canaduh have a comedy folk show, called "Rick Mercer Visits America"; & you, MDC, are a fantastic candidate.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
9. Ghettos: why don't you have them legislated against, w/ your easy means to panacea, MDC? If only it were that easy, eh? Fact is, it doesn't work, or there would be no problems, the Soviets would have flourished, Kennedy & MLK Jr. would still be alive, & we wouldn't need Visa, & even U know it, (though it scares U s******s to understand that Dr Uncle Sam is absolutely correct in all he says & writes.) Perhaps you worked for America's new Mommy & Daddy, helping them destroy values.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
10. In fact, gov't results are always conspiratorial in creating problems where none previously existed; for that is the explicit, usurpatory purpose of the police/lawyer/judge/politician co-op called gov't. On the warmongering lawyer Abe Lincoln, get it right: see the 1:03 min Youtube vid, "Ron Paul on the American Civil War." His whole library is online, ya' know; there's much to learn from Dr. Uncle Sam.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
11. Simply put, Dr. Paul would dismember the force-backed super-state collective that has made U so dependent that U can't think for yourself. Albeit painful, recognize that in "das Fadherland," your new Mom & Dad's default to aggressive initiatory force, threat, or coercion U so love is an immoral, primitive, cave-man tactic, intended to garner collective power in an easy, unconscious, lazy man's fashion, rather than earning it through hard effort.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
12. Through out-competing, & thereby rewarding every productive person's hard-earned efforts, by producing superior, life-lifting net values, (as only free, creative, & voluntary business marketing by the super-competing upstart can,) the value-destroyers are shown the door. Will U have to go through that door, MDC? Is that why U are so reflexive against "Dr. No?" Remember MDC, today's "Screw the neighbours!" is the same as tomorrow's "Screw the grand kids!"
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Shut up Bestmountjoy. Nobody's listening and you're not making any sense.
MarkDouglas, I wasn't saying Lincoln did anything wrong... I was just asking if Lincoln believed there was something Constitutionally wrong with his making slavery illegal. I personally admire the man. I agree with his decision to end slavery.
I would have done the same, regardless of the Constitution, but did the Constitution say something against what he did?
Also, when did Ron Paul say that?
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
Sorry Bestmountjoy. I really shouldn't have said that. I take it back, because I was wrong.
Anyways, Mark Douglas, I watched the video. Ron Paul did NOT say that he wanted slavery to continue. He just said there were better ways of ending it. I don't understand where you got that he wants black children to be raped and sold, because he never said that! EVER!
You do know that the North won, and as such, the North has written the history books.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
The one who wins the war is the one who writes the history books.
Look at Napoleon. Napoleon rose to power because the people were tired of the monarchs' tyranny. At this point, the monarchs were all allying against any rebellions in Europe. They were heartlessly suppressing the people.
They were ten times worse than Napoleon would ever have been.
But look at how the history books paint Napoleon. It's a given that Napoleon was a power-hungry, insane dictator.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
The same thing could have happened with the North. I assume you have overlooked the fact that, in that era, factories were as bad as the cotton plantations.
Children had no choice but to work in the factories, or else their families would starve. The factories took heavy, heavy tolls on the workers' bodies. This was when there was no limitation to industry, and the industries enslaved the working class of the North.
The North was no better than the South.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
I'm not defending slavery, I'm just saying that the Civil War was not necessarily the fight of good vs. evil.
It was evil vs. evil.
Lincoln chose his side. Apparently Ron Paul would have chosen another. Like General Lee; He disapproved of slavery, but when the time came to choose between two evils, he chose the South.
The choice was impossibly difficult back then. You can't paint one side as being the good guys! That would dishonor the courage and valiance of their opponents.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
Hi MrZaborski,
U are a big man of honesty! Thanks for the thought. Accepted.
I just wish we Canucks had a Dr. Ron Paul to work toward; I'd quit my job & volunteer; Hee! Of course, the r3volution is needed here too, so I labor ~ that the momentum continues to build towards our direction (I'd love to get that lazy old bag & all her progeny off our valueless currency.)
This Youtube speaks volumes: /watch?v=n5pkDB7zEeo
~W.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago 2
You're trying to get Queen Elizabeth 2 off your money? It never occurred to me how much of a nuisance it would be to have someone else's Queen on your money. Good luck!
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
Of course Paul doesnt say he wants slavery you idiot -- I never said he did.
Try to grasp this. He says NO ONE has a right to STOP slavery if a state wants it. He puts the states rights to have slavery -- even if slavery is wrong -- above anyone elses right to stop it.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
The states did have the right, okay? I know it seems unfair to you, but there's a lot of unfair things in this world protected by the law.
Take Bill Gates. He made a fortune by monopolizing the computer industry. He was in charge of Microsoft spying on Apple and stealing one of their genius ideas before it was even introduced to the market (which, might I add, made Microsoft rich.)
That doesn't make him a criminal. That doesn't mean we can just blast his door down and take all of his money.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
The top people in the California Teachers Association give themselves EXTREMELY expensive summer vacations, courtesy of the teachers off of whose paychecks they get deducted. Anyone on the board who says anything against them gets kicked out so he/she can't say anymore.
But nobody has the right to plant bombs under these people's vacation homes.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
The pharmaceuticals pass out drugs BEFORE they're tested. They even lobby so that these medications are mandatory. People die because of it.
Does the Supreme Court have the right to make selling all untested drugs illegal?
Does the Supreme Court have the right to pass laws against corporations?
The right to dismantle and choose the leadership of the teachers unions?
Do they have the right to outlaw unhealthy food?
Or infringe on the banks' rights to charge SUPER HIGH interest rates on loans?
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
13. Of course, the weak, unsubstantiated, "WWE ego's" that love easy power would squash him, & then get all the hypnotized & fluoridated MDC's all over to believe this is the new meaning of "free enterprise." Well, there you have it; but rather than change the meaning of words, lets call a spade a spade; this is not "free-enterprise" but rather, "regulated red economics in New Red America." And this I know much better than U do, MDC; I'm in Red Canaduh, & this is old to us.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
14. Here I have the pleasure of 6 mth. socialist line ups in health care, where competition from private industry is outlawed, (just like yours will become without a Prez. Paul.) Then, because everything is on the public purse, they can justify getting heavy handed in all things; try riding a bicycle w/out a helmet in this place & you will meet up with big brother protecting you from yourself with one hand in your pocket, & a tazer in the other. That is surely moronic, U are right on that one.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
15. This is your "coercion" by "laws" MDC, in all of its burgeoning, moronic glory. Man, evolve out of it! Your kid's happiness is now at stake. Not a good time for frivolity & play w/ unsubstantial assertions.
Since U inaccurately, pathologically, reduce us to being so dark & evil, I wonder how U rationalize how these very same morons ("everyone," U believe) can be entrusted with our lives thru their feared guns &fists-backed laws.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
16. Further, U holds that these same morons can be counted on to create a "system of laws" that somehow magically; automatically work to protect us against themselves that make them? Yeah, right! That's rich! And I have an igloo lottery to sell you here. Would U understand Dr. Paul's "Congress Straight Talk" docs, like "Political Power and the Rule of Law," of February 5, 2007? Easy default to monopoly-creating legislation is the lazy man's panacea, MDC.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
17. Truly creative upstarts will inevitably out-compete the lazy, incompetent morons U call yourself & all Earthlings. Even now, regulated, un-free, limited competition is what keeps GM somewhat honest against Toyota, & Gates honest against Linux, or S. Jobs at Apple. And Nike honest against Reebok. If we had true "free-enterprise", your country would have built an oil refinery since 1978, & further, gasoline would be used only to run vintage cars, since replaced by better upstart technology.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
18. And, maybe U would no longer have worries of cancer, headaches, or any other disease. Perhaps, the matchbox U live in would be totally self-sustained. But no; thanks to your beloved morons, U have none of that. But they can still count on dumb U to shill for them; as long as they can keep U believing in the Easter bunny, about them hopping up to be there "for you," (the "free" American,) with their artificial basket of "checks & balances." Methinks U should turn off the TV you saw that on.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
19. You heard it here first, MDC: Zion's DC is the new Hollywood. Just ask the "checks & balances" hominids behind 911 who run the New York Freemason's beaver lodge. MDC, even through your confusion, your intuition knows you've got Email from out of the great ether that you need to look at. For instance, see Youtube, "Ron Paul supporters look out for HR. 1955" among thousands of others. I remain, honestly in hope against hope, for your awakening.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
You moronic Lincoln haters should thank Lincoln every day of your lives. Without Abe, USA would have broken apart years ago, and world history would have been drastically different. Nazis would have won WW2, because the south would have supported Hitler, if they could. And your sorry asses would have been punk slaves for Japs and Germans.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Lincoln didn't end slavery by himself. Congress and the people passed the 13th Amendment -- you may have heard of that.
Lincoln wisely and legally ended slavery only in the states that were under marshal law, then he caused slavery to end all over by personally getting the 13th Amendment through congress, just one day before he was killed
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Defoe said "All men would be tryants -- if they could."
He was a lot smarter than Rand, and more concise.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Whats with Rand talk? This is about the Judge and Paul, both of whom think states can damn well have slaves, rape the slaves, and sell your OWN children from those rapes into slaver -- if you wanna. These idiots think states have more rights that people.
I got news for you punks - states are a fucking figment of your imagination, a construct in your fucking head. People are real. These pukes just use term "states rights" to justify their own greedy hateful souls.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
What? Ron Paul has NEVER said ANYTHING LIKE THIS!
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
Ron Paul said Lincoln had no reason or right to stop the states from having slaves. Bullshit. The fucking STATES had no rights enslaving people. If Lincoln had no reason or right to stop slavery -- then Paul is also saying it was okay for states to have that slavery. Ron Paul is a punk, the more you find out what the scum bucket has stood for, the worse he seems. He toned down his crazy ass rhetoric to run for president, but he is still a crazy loon bastard who would allow slavery
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
When did he say this?
When did Ron Paul say Lincoln had no right? But if he did, Lincoln himself did say he had no right, in a way, didn't he? He said he went into the war not to end slavery, but to "preserve the union"
Wasn't it only after Gettysburg that he realized that the war would only break out again unless he overstepped his boundaries and made owning slaves illegal?
I may be wrong... Don't take my word for it.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
Lincoln didnt start the war, but once the moron slave raping macho ducks in the south started it, Lincoln wisely used the war to do some good.
The south essentially was like a Nazi nation, till the civil war. No freedom of speech, racial superiority, white men could kill blacks, rape blacks, sell their own children from those rapes. Even Nazis didn't sink that low. Lincoln ended that shit. Good.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Part 19/19: So until after 2012, due to your avid personal preponderance toward destruction of persons, freedom & values (a common trait of unfree-market, legislature-lobbying, guns & fists backed, anti-civilized, fascist collectivists, whatever their stripe) & the learning before U, until at least then, I no longer volunteer association nor discussion with your incorrect self. MDC, is your last name "Cheney," or "Clinton?"
whowouldtheworldelect
(c o m)
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 18/19: Instead, perhaps you'll move toward a code of peaceful voluntarism, goodwill, & net value production as in the Constitution. Rand's books are still great teachers ~ selling well; Tarbell peaked at the mere 1911 inconveniencing of Rockefeller.
As for "history," (speaking of "objective, wide-scope history") Alex Jones' can help U out with some of that in a very few short weeks. I'm excited for U; don't let your naïve trust in criminal hegemony blow the growth opp. you so need.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 17/19: Indeed, at least one of Miss Rand's characters, "Dagny Taggart," is authoritatively considered to be specifically mentored after Tarbell. Though you are now almost inextricably tangled & lost in your own personal existentialist mysticism, it would fill you with joy to have a regime change between your ears ~ away from imitating your "leader's" default to initiatory force, its threat, or other immoral coercion as a means of dealing with others.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 16/19: I suggest you start with Nathaniel Brandon (the father of the term "self-esteem") for a year's primer on civilized behaviour. Then follow up with a year or two of learning the concentration required to comprehend Ayn Rand's forward-looking words as they perform loop-d'-loops around any of your muckraking Tarbell-ism's. After that, learn from the master of "laissez-faire," Ludwig vonMises; or the John Birch Society, if you can 'no-comprende' Dr. Paul's new book.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 15/19: You, MDC, have got one hell of a lot of reading to do if you want to compete; as your reflex default toward crying for fascist gov't guns & fists "controls," & using venom are now obsolete to your survival.
Are you a fan of Ida's great text "The Business of Being a Woman" or "The Ways of Woman" & do you admire Mussolini as she did? Perhaps you labored for the lobby-backed Haliburton/Standard Oil style of "free enterprise?"
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 14/19: MDC, it seems you'll continue to sacrifice all to 0.75% GNP centralized-banking growth, until you can't eat anymore w/ out "leadership" to hold your spoon. You think Butsh, Hitlery, Obamanation or Mcgain are trustworthy. Man, whose payroll are U on?
One day, you must step up to compete on your own value's merits as an individual. Your laughable, vacuous, shrill clanging will not stop the coming epoch of benevolence that Dr. Paul & we self-leaders are ushering.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 13/19: >"Today's politico/religio/mainstream lobby [white-collar hoax] collectivization has produced un-free [monopolistic, big-legislature lobbying, regulated] economies, where[in] upstarts [are forced to] fail."
I rest my case. You are incompetent for business; for you are a gov't loving, dependent, collectivist in need of a big-brother to babysit you. You put it best, AttunedFlux.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 12/19: Do you think coercion is a moral trait, marking a civilized people; to have them monopolized by the lowest common force-backed hominid? Do you think Butsch or your value-destroying puppet gov't gives a dadgum about setting competition honest? Pick up your knuckles & evolve out of it, man! I suggest you read for full understanding before you go online throwing up all over the place. It's sad to witness your unsubstantiated prurient "writhings."
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Yeah coercion of some sort is necessary, aka laws. Since you have shown that all men would be fucking tyrants, if they could - yes, you need laws. You need rational checks and balances. Some of those checks and balances you could call "coersion" if you want. Or call it purple dog doo. What has allowed men to "evolve" is our limits on the evil bastards who would enslave others if they could -- and thats pretty much fucking all of us.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Part 13/19: >"Today's politico/religio/mainstream lobby [white-collar hoax] collectivization has produced un-free [monopolistic, big-legislature lobbying, regulated] economies, where[in] upstarts [are forced to] fail."
I rest my case. You are incompetent for business; for you are a gov't loving, dependent, collectivist in need of a big-brother to babysit you. You put it best, AttunedFlux.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 12/19: Do you think coercion is a moral trait, marking a civilized people; to have them monopolized by the lowest common force-backed hominid? Do you think Butsch or your value-destroying puppet gov't gives a dadgum about setting competition honest? Pick up your knuckles & evolve out of it, man! I suggest you read for full understanding before you go online throwing up all over the place. It's sad to witness your unsubstantiated prurient "writhings."
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 11/19: By default, legislature-backed anti-upstarts win of no worthy opponent. J-e-e-e-s-s-c-c-h! Left up to you to produce net value, & we'd all still be Fred & Wilma. Yea, I know, I'm the "idiot," Hee-he! I'm in friggin' red Canaduh; stay where U are, humanoid. There's enough of your kind here already, trying to get largesse of "business" out of the barrel of a gun in a marble & hors d'euvres, mcgain climate. Did you comprehend my word, "coercion" MDC? What do you think the word means?
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 10/19: Reproduction, though rightfully voluntary, is not for the frivolous, MDC. There remains lots of unfinished business from that era, & your hominid, violent attitude is a living symptom of its un-suppressed, inherited fury.
You are no representation of how a typical yankee upstart behaves. Yet, as witnessed in your boring, impotent style of flaming discordianism, lil' wonder it takes a Standard Oil or a Mexican to bring something to market.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 9/19: Even though so severely encumbered by these European tapeworms & the maggoty conditions MDC so loves, the closest to a free-market totality as has yet existed on Earth, was the ensuing industrial revolution (greatest advance & growth on Earth yet.)
To date, you still owe that debt, by the way. And they want it back in return for your just-barely legal life. Which of your ill-considered entrenchments are U pushing onto your babies?
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 8/19: Surely you are joking to even assert Earth has seen "free-enterprise" yet? That beautiful, fresh, life-lifting beginning started to promptly end before it even began in 1783, mrnarrow-history buff***, the year the kipper crown finally won the US revolution with nary a flint nor more Boston Pekoe tea wasted; after B. Franklin returned from Europe with the Declared "Independent" Union's beggings to finance its fledgling infrastructure.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 7/19: Do you figure these events comprised a free-market totality of conditions, MDC? To what is due your entrenchment in such dishonesty? In fact, when & where exactly have such conditions yet existed on planet Earth? The upstart James J. Hill's railways nearly ran themselves, by contrast. Doubt you even heard of him (read up on how your brand of legislature-gun "free-enterprise" monopolization squashed him too, histrionic man.)
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 7/19: Do you figure these events comprised a free-market totality of conditions, MDC? To what is due your entrenchment in such dishonesty? In fact, when & where exactly have such conditions yet existed on planet Earth? The upstart James J. Hill's railways nearly ran themselves, by contrast. Doubt you even heard of him (read up on how your brand of legislature-gun "free-enterprise" monopolization squashed him too, histrionic man.)
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 6/19: Do writer's read? Not ex-labor "wanna' be's", apparently. ... MDC, Tarbell would have voted for Dr. Ron Paul ~ as from Wikipedia: "... she accused the leaders of the Standard Oil Company of using unfair tactics to put her father and many small oil companies out of business." [opposers to her Daddy were all cozied in w/ your great grandfathers' generations-draining, force-backed, Washington-bleeding, bank-financed, snaking, inflatulatory, unprofitable railways.] "Free-competition?"
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 5/19: Are your ideas not worthy of support from your own hand? I am wondering, "Is MDC's default here revealing his incompetence, his lazyness, his basic high "serf"-esteem, or is it pure envy? I think all four.
Tarbell came on strong after her upstart Dad was forced out by Standard Oil, after it "mated w/unnatural forces, threats, & coercions ~ against [him,] the out competing upstart, so [Standard] could garner onto itself unearned power over him." MDC's idea of "free-enterprise."
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 4/19: To which I respond him w/ the following:
Perhaps you can cease with your default to ig-grunts & ad hominid slander long enough to substantiate your "idiocy." Then again, maybe you can't; I sense that I am witnessing a dense mass of aimless fury that merely stands upright with knees mostly locked, responding from weakness to raise the knuckles off the ground. Why else would you not contribute evidence for your insinuations?
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 3/19: Mind ~ MDC means "use brute gov't force or threat" when he says "stop..." Is it that he doesn't feel as if he's already living in a state of "monopoly and slavery," or is it that he thinks the US has a "Totally free market you idiot?" He thinks the sleight-of-handed, big-business, Rockefellers are a result of "free-enterprise." He doesn't know what the word "upstart" means. But worse yet, he owns a vote. Egads!
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
You're not making any sense.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
Sorry, I was responding to BestmountJoy. I didn't think it would come up on the top of the page.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
Part 2/19: After I asked him to check his incorrect self on this (check back to my comment earlier Sunday for context) he flamed into my Youtube inbox, to quote:
"Competition my ass. Totally free market you idiot, leads to monopoly & slavery you idiot. Only when you stop monopolies, and have reasonable rules about labor, do you get competition you idiot. I suggest you read some fucking history you idiot, start with Ida Tarbell." Unquote.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Part 1/19: I wish to share my exchange w/ MarkDouglasC over the last couple of days. It will take a few log-ins to complete this thread, but stay tuned; I'll get it all in there. His profile says he wants to be a writer. He thinks that yesteryear's & today's legislature-lobbying, white-collar-hoax-complex-pandering, bought-off politicians-for-hire, (using their guns & fists empire to redirect & steal what they are not competent to earn, masked as "business") is called "free-enterprise."
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Go Napolitano! Vote Ron Paul!!! The majority of Ron Paul's supporters are our own boys (millitary) as well. Whether democrat or republic, even non voters alike adore Ron Paul. He has the most consistent record of them all. Genuinely "for the people"
KARStarla 3 years ago
Ron Paul is one of us
VoteYourConsience 3 years ago 16
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Abe Lincoln didn't start the war you moron, the southern idiots who were showing off for some flappy titted women started it. Lincoln fought back. If Lincoln was such a bad ass -- why didn't he start the war? Why did he do everything he could to avoid it - and would never have fought, unless US was attacked.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Create an underground economy if you want to survive.
Schmoogee 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The judge is a bigger idiot than Paul. Both morons think a state can have slaves, if they want to, and there isn't anything anyone can do -- by their idiot theory -- about it.
Its wacko jacko.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
Abraham Lincoln was a tyrannical dictator and a terrorist.
axltyler 3 years ago
Lincoln was not a terrorist, he was only working for the wrong side. He thought that he was putting an end to slavery, when in reality, he was helping the corporations in the North gain monopolies.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
Bollox, he was a railroad parasite himself and he had ZERO interest in slavery beyond hating blacks and wanting them deported. He used slavery like Bush used 'WMD', as an excuse. Read "The Real Lincoln" and educate yourself on this, because your school decieved you
Capnwabbit 3 years ago
monopolies are the natural result of totally free enterprise, and had nothing to do with Lincoln moron. The big trusts and monopolies came 40-80 years later, after Lincoln.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Fine, big industry. Or something. Because Lincoln was killed while rebuilding the South. Not while fighting the South.
And I know there were a lot of big industries in the North that wanted the South gone so that there was no competition for their goods.
It fits doesn't it? The North had him offed, didn't they? Opinions please... do you people think Lincoln's murder was organized by the South or the North?
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
Are you retarded? Lincoln's assination is one of the best known crimes in history. Southern scum were pissed as hell that Lincoln upset their little slave raping world. Lincoln wasn't rebuilding the south yet you idiot, the war had just ended. He had just completed getting the 13th Amendment through Congress.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Yeah, but another best known crime is that Lee Harvey Oswald was working alone when he shot Kennedy.
Which explains why Oswald was shot before testimony right?
And also perfectly explains the reason that Kennedy's brother was shot soon after that.
History books tell us Oswald was working alone, and the same history books tell us Booth was an angry southerner. I don't know. He could have been. But then again, some Northerners could have been helping him for their own reasons.
MrZaborskii 3 years ago
MarkDouglasC:
Please check this more thoroughly, lest someone thinks U have not advanced beyond some dem/lib paper or neo-con red school; U are incorrect. Competition is the result of totally free enterprise. Monopolization occurs when stagnating enterprise mates w/unnatural force, threat or coercion against the out competing upstart, to garner onto itself unearned favor against him. Today's politico/religio/mainstream lobby collectivization has produced un-free economies, where upstarts fail.
Bestmountjoy 3 years ago
Competition my ass. Totally free market you idiot, leads to monopoly and slavery you idiot. Only when you stop monopolies, and have reasonable rules about labor, do you get competition you idiot.
I suggest you read some fucking history you idiot, start with Ida Tarbell.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Do you morons REALLY don't know the fucking history of Standard Oil -- and the other monopolies, and slavery, that came about under "free enterprise". Gesus you fucking people are dumb fucks about history.
Competition is a bitch -- ask the airlines, ask FORD and GM. IF airlines could - you fucking idiots -- they would merge and have a monopoly you idiot. Only laws and the courts can prevent monopolies. Learn some fucking history you fucking idiots.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
Wow...if you arent 12 years old, i feel sorry for you.
AttunedFlux 3 years ago
you've been educated by a federal program. I can tell.
axltyler 3 years ago
You morons don't know crap. Yes, the Fed keeps issuing paper money -- but that's not some deep conspiracy you idiots. Thats what they GOTTA do, issue a lot of money, cause the wealthy hedge funds and wall street don't want to pay taxes like work pays. The only way to do that -- is to borrow. Borrow from China, and borrow from the fed, who just prints a bunch of money. Get mad at that.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
Don't call people idiots ya douche bag. The feds don't GOTTA do nothing. THEY shouldn't even exist. The U.S. dollar is worthless if you're so smart. The only reason why it has any value at all is because the Middle East agreed to use our money to buy and trade goods and services. The moment this trade stops, it's all over. Take your liberal class warfare and tax hiking arse to another site.
shiftstart 4 years ago 4
i love how people say ron paul is a lier, racist, blah blah, can you even back that up? let me tell ever1 something ron paul is the only one being excluded, when one is excluded it's due to fear, the mass media is paid to exclude ron paul, i find this sad, in America, we exclude a candidate due to the truth? because he is for the constitution? wow, we are docile nation indeed
russia21 4 years ago 3
I feel so bad for him. Notice he didn't actual say I'm endorsing Ron Paul for the President of the United States. Why? Because as a Farce News analyst he is banned from endorsing any political figure directly.
shiftstart 4 years ago
Yea he said that in another interview. I've also heard, not sure if its true, that RP might pick him to be his running mate. That would be tight.
jwka2001 4 years ago
Well that would be nice but I doubt it.
shiftstart 4 years ago
Yea but u never know, i bet he would be a great VP. But im not RP so i wouldnt know who he would pick, but Napolitano ovbiously isnt an idiot like the others running for president. I forget which interview he did but he's not allowed to pick someone since he is in Fake News corp. He could also pick Pat Buchanan he likes paul im sure paul likes him too, but never know who'd he'd pick till he announces.
jwka2001 4 years ago
Well Pat Buchanan is a bit of a protectionist then a libertarian. But I would say they would agree 95% at a time. :)
shiftstart 4 years ago
Yea and u never know, he could go across the isle and pick Kucinich, they are good friends. Although they would be very differnt on various ideas, but like Liberty and what not would be the same. Id probably get Kucinich for a cabinet or something like that position
jwka2001 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Going For Gold moneybomb still needs over 3m to hit target by Feb 5th !! Please donate today. No amount is too small. Spread the word. ronpaul2008 dot com
comtoket 4 years ago
Amazing!
qazol2 4 years ago 5
Judge, you are the hero as well.
Thank you.
vistakom 4 years ago 7
Ron Paul both a Scholar, Patriot and Gentlemen.
President Dr. Ron Paul.
WindoRitmo 4 years ago 10
Wonder how long he will be @ Fox now. Great Job! Ron Paul 2008.
rkwylie 4 years ago 4
If Ron Paul doens't win, I would like Judge Napolitano to run for presidnet in 2012.
FlashVirus 4 years ago 3
Notice: correction: its AMEN to MarkDouglasC, not the video. post comments suppose to be under MarkDouglasC....
pcmiler2000 4 years ago
Constitution is the bases of MLK's message. Government has been turning socialist and you sheeps don't realize it. Welfare and government subsidies = socialism. It destroys us minorities you idiots. Wake Up!
mustangjake2073 4 years ago 4
YouTube:OUTFOXED: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism and then spread it to everyone you know.
NotTooLate2008 4 years ago
Ron Paul the best
sodasoap 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ron Paul is a nice old kook. He is like a cleaned up KKK anti jew, anti black, conspiracy wacko. He personally seems like a nice guy, who would of course be against bigotry, slavery. But the states rights principles he spews, and the strict construction crap, was the ONLY excuse for slavery. And was used to deny popular labor laws for DECADES. 1850-1910. Learn some history.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
Wow you are a moron. Constitution was also pushed for fair labor laws. Don't only read into the corporate side of history you moron. Do your own research.
mustangjake2073 4 years ago
Ive read and studied about this most my life, amazed how peope can use any excuse like states rights as ONLY excuse to keep slavery. It was clear, they didnt care about states rights. Its always about power, prestige, or pussty. They just grab things like the constutition, or religion, or some phrase, as an excuse.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
AMEN!!!!!!!!!
pcmiler2000 4 years ago
must are you mental? Really, are you? Constitution was "pushed" for fair labor laws? WTF, have you never read a book? Strict construction folks stopped labor laws for DECADES you moron. Corporations and the rich sure didnt want any labor laws. Let children be worked to death, let people die in unsafe working conditions. The USSC strict constructionist were helping the very rich screw workers, and America - for 100 years, you moron.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
AMEN!!!!!!!!!
pcmiler2000 4 years ago
A Big Amen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If im a black man, the constitution is dead!!
If im a brown man, the constitution is dead!!
If im a yellow man, the constitution is dead!
If im a WHITE,RED-NECK,KKK man, the constitution is ALIVE!!! Only if the blacks, browns, and yellows rights are dead.....
Its PayBack White Man!!! Why u losing your rights, we color people gaining!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!
pcmiler2000 4 years ago
AMAN!!!!!!!!!!
pcmiler2000 4 years ago
if he's such a racist, then why was he giving FREE MEDICAL HEALTH CARE to low income blacks and hispanics who couldn't afford it.
DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
axltyler 3 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Why do White Supremest follow Ron Paul?
He has had a long association with the Ludwig von Mises Institute, a think tank based in Auburn, Alabama. The think tank was founded by Lew Rockwell, who served as Paul's congressional chief of staff from 1978 to 1982. Paul was the lead speaker at Lew Rockwell and the Mises Institute's 1995 conference on Secession from the United States: "We'll explore what causes [secession] and how to promote it."
w w w . tnr . com / downloads / secession . pdf
fireskin12 4 years ago
MarkDouglasC is a fucking moron.... I'm sory that's incorrect. What I meant to say is that he is a dumbass motherfucking ignorant asshole piece of wet smelly dogshit who likes to get robbed blind by the shitholes who have fucked up America. Stupid bitch.
nododon 4 years ago
You morons that want to get rid of FED reserve -- be careful what you wish for, idiots. You dont have any idea what would happen. YOu have these looney idea what happened -- and no idea what might happen. Be careful morons.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
ur a disallusioned fool markdouglas you have no idea what you are talking about get out of our country
only thing that woul happpen without fed reserve is that we wouldnt have to pay the government for secret groups and pay them for our tips and paychecks
we decide where our money goes
rnrbear101 4 years ago
how misguided are you friend. Research the history of our Central bank and the reasons they were established. Research How the FED is run and by whom. The purchasing power of the dollar is 4 cents as of now. The fed was the cause of the great depression and every bubble since.
illusionofsafety07 4 years ago
Yes I agree the money supply is wacko -- we have let the gov print massive amounts of money, cheaping currency. But get a new boogieman. Dont blame some 800 year old conspiracy. The fed prints massive money - and borrows billions a day - cause the rich dont want to pay taxes. Work now pays 75% of the taxes, the unearned income now pays far less taxes. If we didnt print and borrow so much, the rich would have to pay more. They dont want to. Blame them.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
You've got it all wrong. If the Federal Government didn't spend so much, we wouldn't have to print and borrow so much. That is where the blame lies. It's a cop out to blame rich people because the top 5% of wage earners already pay the lions share
jll62 4 years ago
The rich people pay crap. Two people, both make 100k-- who will pay the most tax? The one that worked for his 100K? Or the one that got it from cap gains? The worker will pay almost 300% higher taxes. The fact is, the wealthy refusal to pay their taxes is what makes us borrow, and print money.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago 3
well, I'm not just for getting rid of the Fed Reserves. I'm also for getting rid of the human beings who own the stock of the Federal Reserve.
axltyler 4 years ago
Too bad we'll never know who owns the fed. One of the best kept secrets in the world. Interesting to ask as well when the last time our gold was accounted for...
jamo387 3 years ago
We do know who owns the Fed. Eustace Mullins exposed it in his book first published in 1952.
axltyler 3 years ago 3
Naturally this moron would support Paul -- he believes like Paul does -- that states can have slavery if they want it -- and the federal government has no right to stop it. The rights of the people who are raped, worked to death, sold, are nothing.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
i mean, if there gonna pay someone to come on here and argue against ron paul. couldnt they atleast get someone with intelligence and strong argument points.
Labellyy 4 years ago