@aFemale1 Order, Basically. Like he said, If the camera man fell off the wall and then Brian threw the ball, It just wouldnt work, Brian would needed to have thrown the ball to trigger the fall. But about the sun. One person could see the sun explode then Brian talk about it when another person could see Brian talk about it then the sun explodes, It just about order&light basically
I wished I would have had a physics teacher like that back in school - when he explains things, I understand everythjng... my phsyics teacher on the other hand was incapable of teaching us anything....
@pancakeguru1990 Light is time-like. You are unable to effect the order of light events as its speed is constant regardless of any space-like events. Einstein famously said if you are on a train traveling at the speed of light and you shone a torch ahead of you, you would see a normal beam. A stationary observer would not see the light leave the torch until you slowed down. At these speeds, the thing which is changing is time and space. My head hurts.
@DanLFC8 They're not travelling backwards in time, they're perceiving time going in the same direction just with some events in a different order as a result of their velocity relative to them.
@oystersdontbleed It's not just a matter of perception, there is actually a very particular point of separation. Just like prof. Cox said, it's all about the speed of light:
1. If one thing happens, and then another thing happens *soon enough and far enough that not even light could get from the first to the second event if it tried* they're space-like. Point being they cannot 'cause' each other (no influence can travel faster than light) so causality is preserved.
@oystersdontbleed No, there's a sphere of influence around any event the radius of which is the speed of light multiplied by the time since the event happened and any events that happen in that sphere are timelike to the initial event and any that happen outside it are spacelike.
Its admirable that brian cox can explain let alone understand such theories of the universe. I wonder what kind of man it takes to actually formulate them, even if it did take 10 years... Einsteins question of riding the speed of light apparently came from a dream he had when 2 horses were pulling a sleigh. How a molecular brain logically assembles a thought, let alone a man coming up with a never before heard of idea. to completely have a unique picture of things is truely impressive.
I've written a song dedicated to Professor Brian Cox. You can find it on my channel or search "song for professor brian cox" and find my name Jules Mann. If you're free please check it out and leave a comment.
I don't get it... what's the difference between the time it takes for the ball to leave a hand and knock someone off a wall (perhaps 3 seconds) and the time it takes for someone on earth to notice that the sun has exploded (8 minutes)? Both seem to be the same basic cause and effect situation, only obviously on two different scales.
Let's say the sun explodes at noon. Alice is on top of the sun and notices immediately, at noon. But at that exact moment (noon), for Bill on earth, the sun has NOT exploded.
At noon+8 seconds, Bill sees the explosion take place. From Bill's perspective, Alice's observations of the explosion happened BEFORE the actual explosion. The order of events seems reversed (an explosion being observed 8 seconds before it has 'happened').
Suppose you have two events separated in space and time. A moving frame can be found where the events can be located at *either* the same time or space, but not both. So space like events are always separated by space, time like separated by time in every possible frame.
Dam my brain hanged itself on a noose trying to process this.
Flextaa 2 months ago
what is he talking about ?
aFemale1 2 months ago
@aFemale1 Order, Basically. Like he said, If the camera man fell off the wall and then Brian threw the ball, It just wouldnt work, Brian would needed to have thrown the ball to trigger the fall. But about the sun. One person could see the sun explode then Brian talk about it when another person could see Brian talk about it then the sun explodes, It just about order&light basically
Glamberter 1 month ago
I wished I would have had a physics teacher like that back in school - when he explains things, I understand everythjng... my phsyics teacher on the other hand was incapable of teaching us anything....
kinskifreak2011 2 months ago
HUHmmm well now let´s watch some porn :D
idotrustpwr 3 months ago
@idotrustpwr ha ha ha
aFemale1 2 months ago
My brain just literally told me he'd had enough, he couldn't take and more and walked out the room...
Dannoneusk91 4 months ago
This man, professor Brian Cox is so beautiful, inside out!! Amaising person, i am honnored even to see him speak.
aFemale1 4 months ago in playlist Več videoposnetkov uporabnika bongoreef
@AngeloNiklis What does rabbits shutting their eyes have to do with the Sun blowing up?
theart1rm 4 months ago
important caveats are important :)
x1plus1x 4 months ago
Um....what? :)
AmyK007 5 months ago
he never explained what a light-like event is :(
pancakeguru1990 6 months ago
@pancakeguru1990 Light is time-like. You are unable to effect the order of light events as its speed is constant regardless of any space-like events. Einstein famously said if you are on a train traveling at the speed of light and you shone a torch ahead of you, you would see a normal beam. A stationary observer would not see the light leave the torch until you slowed down. At these speeds, the thing which is changing is time and space. My head hurts.
jacksawild 6 months ago
Important caveats are important. Cox is a troll!
Ishamoridin 9 months ago
Wow, somehow, he explained that, and I understood... So much more effective than lectures, sheesh!
ThePinkishGizmo 9 months ago
Good o_O
xCometo 10 months ago
so really that person who runs past the universe is really travelling back in time to see you talk about the sun (i know its not a person)
DanLFC8 1 year ago
@DanLFC8 who's time? there is no universal clock. look up special relativity.
edga69 11 months ago
@edga69 Nobody is time. Time is not a person.
Ishamoridin 9 months ago
Comment removed
edga69 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ishamoridin Sorry, I meant "whose", not "who's". And by time I meant reference frame.
edga69 9 months ago
@edga69 I may not have been entirely genuine in asking that question.
Ishamoridin 9 months ago
Comment removed
edga69 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ishamoridin But you may have been entirely genuine in asking that question.
edga69 9 months ago
@DanLFC8 They're not travelling backwards in time, they're perceiving time going in the same direction just with some events in a different order as a result of their velocity relative to them.
Ishamoridin 9 months ago
Surely everything is a space-like event, and things only appear otherwise because of the scale at which we perceive things?
oystersdontbleed 1 year ago
@oystersdontbleed It's not just a matter of perception, there is actually a very particular point of separation. Just like prof. Cox said, it's all about the speed of light:
1. If one thing happens, and then another thing happens *soon enough and far enough that not even light could get from the first to the second event if it tried* they're space-like. Point being they cannot 'cause' each other (no influence can travel faster than light) so causality is preserved.
2. All others are time-like.
KillahMate 11 months ago
@oystersdontbleed No, there's a sphere of influence around any event the radius of which is the speed of light multiplied by the time since the event happened and any events that happen in that sphere are timelike to the initial event and any that happen outside it are spacelike.
Ishamoridin 9 months ago
If the sun explodes and you live on Earth it doesn't matter a hill of beans what someone in space thinks :)
ArtisanTony 1 year ago 2
"Important caveats are important." - Prof. Brian Cox
zionravescene 1 year ago 4
i love this guy
MrArekusa 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nom nom nom my watch
featheredmusic 1 year ago
I don't understand anything:(
How can you reverse the order of the claps? He said the past is protected.
The first clap is in the past?
meatpie29 1 year ago
Its admirable that brian cox can explain let alone understand such theories of the universe. I wonder what kind of man it takes to actually formulate them, even if it did take 10 years... Einsteins question of riding the speed of light apparently came from a dream he had when 2 horses were pulling a sleigh. How a molecular brain logically assembles a thought, let alone a man coming up with a never before heard of idea. to completely have a unique picture of things is truely impressive.
SIRA063 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I've written a song dedicated to Professor Brian Cox. You can find it on my channel or search "song for professor brian cox" and find my name Jules Mann. If you're free please check it out and leave a comment.
MrJules567 1 year ago
Simples!
raverdeath100 1 year ago
I don't get it... what's the difference between the time it takes for the ball to leave a hand and knock someone off a wall (perhaps 3 seconds) and the time it takes for someone on earth to notice that the sun has exploded (8 minutes)? Both seem to be the same basic cause and effect situation, only obviously on two different scales.
ransomdave 1 year ago
@ransomdave Here's how I interpret it:
Let's say the sun explodes at noon. Alice is on top of the sun and notices immediately, at noon. But at that exact moment (noon), for Bill on earth, the sun has NOT exploded.
At noon+8 seconds, Bill sees the explosion take place. From Bill's perspective, Alice's observations of the explosion happened BEFORE the actual explosion. The order of events seems reversed (an explosion being observed 8 seconds before it has 'happened').
scooterdooter 1 year ago
@scooterdooter Friendly correction: 8 minutes (not seconds).
Also, I hope Alice has a high SPF on.
GTAMultiPlayerAlpha 1 year ago
@GTAMultiPlayerAlpha You're right, 8 minutes. Alice is gonna need some serious-strength sunglasses as well.
scooterdooter 1 year ago
@scooterdooter it's 8 mins but cheers thats the ticket mate
uv4jjj 1 year ago
@scooterdooter 8mins, not seconds
ATReade 11 months ago
Suppose you have two events separated in space and time. A moving frame can be found where the events can be located at *either* the same time or space, but not both. So space like events are always separated by space, time like separated by time in every possible frame.
BarriosGroupie 1 year ago
omg being stoned and listening to him explain shit is so crazy
JimmyTheKiller 1 year ago
So if you threw a ball at him from really far away. Does it become a space like event?
BillyBobsEel 2 years ago
If the speed of light was infinite, space like events and time like events would be impossible to distinguish from each other.
Meejoe27 2 years ago
@Meejoe27 yes!!
featheredmusic 1 year ago
Lol horrible explanation...but confusing stuff so its understandable
jt101010 2 years ago
yeah yeah - a time like event ....Brains lips move ,then my head explodes :D
1modernmessage 3 years ago 27
@1modernmessage LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
SIRA063 1 year ago
You just blew my frakking mind...
gimp2 3 years ago 17