Sure are exaggerating what you can or cannot do with or without PhysX... like ultraneonoirnatihero stated, most of these effects could be accomplished without, to an extent. Maybe not fully reactive to meshes and movable objects, but it's still possible. Wavering cloth or illusions with just particles could've been accomplished for people who had it turned off or couldn't use it. Just marketing this, really.
they turn off the myst wen physx was off, a disonest selling tactic, ATI cards r cheaper and equaly good, but u cant play with physx exagerated effects cause nvidia owns it, just like dx10 and vista, u had to buy windows vista to play crysis on ultra graphic, but the same graphic can be played with dx9 on xp, or dx10 could be installed on xp, but we cant cause the facist Bill Gates want more for himself!
@Dharma818 Not quite. The Xbox 360 has an ATI GPU which doesn't support it at all, and while the PS3 does have an nVidia GPU, it's an NV47 which is too old to support PhysX. Having said that though, nVidia have licensed PhysX to Sony for use on the PS3, but it will be running on the CPU only (cell SPU's to be specific). To be honest most other physics libraries are capable of running on console CPU's so this isn't really noteworthy... For physics, PS3 > 360. For graphics, 360 > PS3.
Looks good. Shame it's strictly PC and can't be potted for console, although I will say sometimes it feels like a distraction rather then an immersion
Steam, chipped tiles, flying blocks, falling books... most of these things didn't need PhysX in games before, but now they do - just to buy new GPU. It looks good, but it's been done before without PhysX and better incorporated.
Then we can all be happy and get rid of the monopoly nvidia has. I'm not anti nvidia, I just think that a cross platform physics engine would be better. The havok physics engine is equally capable, it's just CPU bound so you can't do as much with it. Make it run on a GPU and it would do anything PhysX can do.
I've been lucky. I recently just bought a GTX 570, and im putting my former GTS 250 I had before as a dedicated physx card. I'm re-installing the game now, I can't wait to see the difference
@cildni Yea I realized that once I found out that despite having a dedicated physx card (gts 250) I got the same results on Batman's benchmark with and without.
Could do all this with Havok or other physics engines. Designers had some special deal with nVidia? Gamers should not support vendor specific solutions.
Some of it looks a bit over the top (the over-use of fog and the 'easy tear' mattress) but, if used discretely, it could make AA that extra bit more awesome!
theres only one problem with physX and that is that its not profound enough. im one of the biggest physX fans out there and spend all my hours looking for demos or merely pissing around in game with physX entities and whatnot. but look at 90% of these scenes, physx is only being used for like 3 sheets of paper or smashing up tiles. why not have a room covered in paper and have it so that the floor itself can literally be torn up and metal be dented. its fully capable- so why not?
@nevasoft2k7 Yes! i love physx it is one of the best things ever! i really cant wait to see what they've done to Arkham city! I totally want to see that
@nevasoft2k7 Looks pretty significant to me as far as setting the mood goes. If you're looking for "profound" changes on what's essentially a PC version of a console game, you're setting your hopes too high. They already pretty much knew this game was going to kill, so they had no reason to mess with the formula other than to improve the graphics a little.
@guzarche3 You have a point. My system probably can't handle something like this, but they could add this like some kind of extra to people with great gaming rigs.
Well, if the game is heavily dependant on PhysX, then only Nvidia users would be able to play it. I guess we wont see these kind of effects like smashing entire walls until AMD comes up with a similar technology for physics calculations
@nevasoft2k7 everything is possible, the thing is that physX takes alot of ram when these things is ON around 40 % more power. they are working on making it looks as good as possible but still make sure computers can run it.
@SincereCreature its damn good to hear people love physx ^^ im taking a gaming course at college so im just hoping to end up making a game in the future and cramming tonnns of physxness in it lol
@nevasoft2k7 cause nvidea can't pay all devs when there is havok and other better engines,physX is only good with soft materials,but they are all cosmetic.And what's the point if ati has almost other half of users,and they can't contribute to nVidea only physX.Better do factial animations or other cool things.
@nevasoft2k7 well, you figure having those 3 pieces of paper cause 10+fps loss imagine how hard it would be to simulate that much. i mean, with physx off i can get full 1080p max setting on my pc at aruond 80+fps, whereas physx drags it down to the 25-40
yet,another physx that shows Sparkles, yet infamous1 and 2 have huge amount of sparkles effects with dynamid phisics on it all over the place. ,Maybe FF13VERSUS will have Apex . for now...Please show us what kind of goodies L.A noire with have =D
Wow... You never know what you're actually missing out on when you play the console version until you see a comparison. Sadly, I do not have an Nvidia card, though I'm not in a hurry to get one since I don't do much PC gaming.
@ssssssssssssssssss50 there is apatch that adds this feature to the game. also it should be in the options. Just make sure you have a good graphics card capable of running physx. Dont be impressed if you playing seeing s slideshow with your G210 xDD
@TheGeforcefan Do you really think they need physx to render smog lol? It's all about marketing. There are plenty of articles online about havok and physx. Educate yourself
Is this a joke? Oh no I can't see 100 blocks across the ground :( oh no! Who gives a fuck. Everything is the SAME other than oh no I can't see 500 bricks flying around. Who cares. Who fucking CARES
The only thing that bother me about this is that the cloth could be done on an xbox (Splinter Cell Conviction) and even a PS2 (Splinter Cell), theres no doubt a mid range PC could do it without an Nvidia GPU
Pre-animated cloth can be done on just about any system. Dynamically simulated and tearable cloth can not, because all vertices must be simulated every frame. This is very taxing on a CPU, while a GPU with its hundreds of cores can deliver the parallel processing goodness.
That's true, but if the cloth has too few polygons, its movement will look very "edgy". In order for there to be proper folds, you need a certain amount of polygonal detail. I don't believe any non-Physx game has done simulated cloth.
Or at least completely realistic cloth, but they could at least make an effort. we still cant make perfect circles in games, but they still put tires on cars. If they just put a few dynamic cloth things around the game world, I could shut up and get on with my so called life
I now noticed that maybe the PhysX settings aren't on high in my game because I can't break floor tiles and wall tiles in my game, even though the menu shows up as "high" but I keep getting the error saying my card doesn't support hardware-accelerated PhysX.
why cant i play this game with Phsyx on High Settings with a msi gtx 460 with latest [v270] nvidia beta drivers? why? papers are freezing in air, no steam, no moving spider webcows e.t.c - after watching this video i just go crazy playing with settings and stuff, but those fucking papers still freeze in mid air... Phsyx on normal Settings is fine, but i want the real deal! ;D
please help a german confused gamer out bros...
and why does Alien vs Predator 3 crash sometimes on the same spots^^?
@TheColorfulPube no it cant! the architecture of the gpu is totaly different compared to a cpu, a gpu can calculate that stuff like 50 times faster than a cpu! trust me, its goood ;D
I am rather shocked by how poorly this game works with out having hardware accelerated physics.
Why get rid of the objects entirely when there is no hardware physics support? what is wrong with having the player walk through the cobwebs, leaving them as just static objects that are not collided with? I accept the generally a card that does not have hardware physics will tend to be low power as well, but transparency is a standard feature for GPUs.
@TheWorldIsYoursxxX You got a GTS 250? me too, I get that stupid message that says my card doesn't support hardware-accelerated physx but it obviously does, as I ran the game with Physx on high and it ran fine and the physx actually work...I only have the 512mb version for now but will upgrade very soon...
@Screep55 It's quite simple.. consoles are old, and therefore almost every PC game has to be tuned down for the consoles.. physX is NOT possible for consoles without a massive fps drop.
@MaRdErN kid,in your country its worth ten bucks,in mine is different because u have other earnings,so If I would have ten bucks like u say i would buy it!
Chill out kid.... how expensive is the game in your country? is belgium a 3th world land? no!? then just import the game from play.com for 6,50 euros and be happy, if you are to dump to use google for finding a crack...
@MaRdErN you are smart,I see you can use google very well but you can't read corectly. to dumm to search for crack? if you think a normal person could in times like these not use google to look for it,who is dummy? Think clear,Dude,I come from what? Damn,you are still a child pretending to be a more adult then U think U are. If I can,I will buy,If I can't I won't. I would like to,but its my desicion,judging someone in this case is a fucking funny thing you know?
You asked for a crack or didnt you? so for me you are to dump to use google.. and dont be naive, "normal" person still cant use google. many need 10min or Hours to find what they are searching for(read you first post again!). But if you know how it works, it will take less then 10sec. You have Internet, you think you have a PC rig(min.250$) to run this game, but you didn't have 5 -10$ for a game?
its hard to believe but ok i believe you. i dont know you so i cant judge you, sorry for that but for the future to avoid this, learn to search for yourself or go to a pirate forum and ask them for help. peace and chill out...
@minxamo Why wouldn't anyone want to play Batman: AA on PC? It's a great PC game with PhysX. Also you can get a much higher resolution/frame-rate on PC compared to 720p/30fps on Consoles.
@KrazyK1289 That and for people who don't like using mouse and keyboard for this game (which is highly recommended and better, I also played the console versions) you can still use a gamepad for this game without any issues, and an Xbox 360 controller no less!
I have SLI setup, the best parts are the Sacrecrow section, it really add to the atmosphere, without it, it sucks. But that one of the only game that actually use the technology so..
Annoying thing, most of that stuff could have been implemented, even if it had to be faked, without the need for it to be full physically simulated. I mean, you can't hardly tell the steam and fog is doing anything other than a sprite based approach on PS2 couldn't handle. There's no need for there to be physics applied to most of that stuff.
There are console titles with Physx, just not insane amounts like this. There are also plenty of console games with AA, even Crysis 2 has it's own form of AA on consoles (though it's crap compared to the kind of AA the PC can do).
@randir14 Yeah i found out about it 5 days ago when watching a "making off" from an xbox game, turns out they can go up to 16X aa, with some tricks/ tho mostly its 4X which is more than enough.
@DarkProject I'm not sure you're correct on this one. Its not the "PC" that can handle it. Its the video card. Because no matter how much cash you invest in a PC, if all you're using is on board video you're not even touching PS2 quality.
Now if customers were willing to pay $1000 for a console, I have no doubt that it could do everything seen here, maybe even more.
@staplerjm The 360 keeps games from evolving. developers have to deal with 5 year old technology. If PC was still the dominant gaming platform games would be light years ahead.
@staplerjm thing with this is...on pc you have to worry about min spec. A min spec pc probably can't pull these effects with a good frame rate so these effects only improve the immersion and nothing else
Crysis was also held back a lot due to min specs especially the Ice areas
@staplerjm maybe... But they still manage to pull off some pretty awesome stuff that unfortunately probably won't be on PC anytime soon. I don't think you should say one platform is better than the other because each one brings a piece of the cake to the table. Yeah sure today's PCs are way more powerful than the consoles. But you still get really good looking and fun games on the latter.
@staplerjm i love my 360, but you're right, PC is just so damn amazing, especiall with my newly upgraded rig with the GTX 580!!!! it totally kicks ass
The rag dolls remind me of the Battlefield 2 ones, the really early stuff before they became very prevalent in gaming today. Super jiggly and extremely loose. Hilarious, nothing wrong with them though.
a high spec machines is capapble of these effectts without the need for this physx crap! what bullshit.
imtheduke 2 weeks ago
So...
All I'd be getting in this stupid game would be paper on the floor, smoke... And... That's about it.
I'd rather play on Radeon then spend the extra money.
1Adr1an6 3 weeks ago
Seems more like a gimmick rather than a worthwhile addition.
Th3GoldenGam3r 3 weeks ago
@Th3GoldenGam3r Nevermind,saw the smoke and steam.Blew my mind.
Th3GoldenGam3r 3 weeks ago
Sure are exaggerating what you can or cannot do with or without PhysX... like ultraneonoirnatihero stated, most of these effects could be accomplished without, to an extent. Maybe not fully reactive to meshes and movable objects, but it's still possible. Wavering cloth or illusions with just particles could've been accomplished for people who had it turned off or couldn't use it. Just marketing this, really.
Zeanu 1 month ago
Lol. WE'RE JUST NOT GONNA SHOW HALF OF THE GAME IF YOU TURN IT OFF...
Zeanu 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
they turn off the myst wen physx was off, a disonest selling tactic, ATI cards r cheaper and equaly good, but u cant play with physx exagerated effects cause nvidia owns it, just like dx10 and vista, u had to buy windows vista to play crysis on ultra graphic, but the same graphic can be played with dx9 on xp, or dx10 could be installed on xp, but we cant cause the facist Bill Gates want more for himself!
nvidia, microsoft, the real mafia!
and who looses? the gamer and the game industrie
anonimous180 1 month ago
Comment removed
anonimous180 1 month ago
Does consoles support physX ?
Dharma818 1 month ago
@Dharma818 Not quite. The Xbox 360 has an ATI GPU which doesn't support it at all, and while the PS3 does have an nVidia GPU, it's an NV47 which is too old to support PhysX. Having said that though, nVidia have licensed PhysX to Sony for use on the PS3, but it will be running on the CPU only (cell SPU's to be specific). To be honest most other physics libraries are capable of running on console CPU's so this isn't really noteworthy... For physics, PS3 > 360. For graphics, 360 > PS3.
sl9sl9 4 weeks ago
Looks good. Shame it's strictly PC and can't be potted for console, although I will say sometimes it feels like a distraction rather then an immersion
Yangy28 2 months ago
Steam, chipped tiles, flying blocks, falling books... most of these things didn't need PhysX in games before, but now they do - just to buy new GPU. It looks good, but it's been done before without PhysX and better incorporated.
ultraneonoirnatihero 2 months ago
@ultraneonoirnatihero That's marketing for ya. =)
Zeanu 1 month ago
dynamic toilet paper FTW!!
Cabi2691 2 months ago
Havok, re-code your physics engine with openCL
Then we can all be happy and get rid of the monopoly nvidia has. I'm not anti nvidia, I just think that a cross platform physics engine would be better. The havok physics engine is equally capable, it's just CPU bound so you can't do as much with it. Make it run on a GPU and it would do anything PhysX can do.
potheadpenguin 2 months ago
When Arkham City comes out for the PC, will you please do a video of it? Please?
pinoyboy579 2 months ago
@pinoyboy579 Yes, of course :)
Zogrim 2 months ago
@Zogrim now do it please... :)
Dharma818 1 month ago
lol at the two top comments
TheJamesisHungry 2 months ago
I've been lucky. I recently just bought a GTX 570, and im putting my former GTS 250 I had before as a dedicated physx card. I'm re-installing the game now, I can't wait to see the difference
xavier6393 3 months ago
@xavier6393
With a GTX 570 you don't need a dedicated Physx card. It'll easily do 60fps with full Physx on its own.
cildni 2 months ago
@cildni Yeah it will. but with my 2x 570 I struggle when I reach the scarecrow scene with all the debris
Sythirus 2 months ago
@cildni Yea I realized that once I found out that despite having a dedicated physx card (gts 250) I got the same results on Batman's benchmark with and without.
xavier6393 2 months ago
I have an AMD Radeon HD 6970 and a 9500 gt for Physx and its awesome! ;)
tilingkai 3 months ago
Holy PhysX Batman!
dessertmonkeyjk 3 months ago 3
37 people have ATI RADEON
SlimSRB 3 months ago 3
Comment removed
SlimSRB 3 months ago
give me your graphics card
4131025 3 months ago
lol! i like the music from the dark knight!
mniyad 3 months ago
wow perimeter music xD nice
masterzh 3 months ago
You know ATI cards can do this with a cheap 8800 Card
keiluko 4 months ago
@keiluko ye but u need to buy a nvidia card. Without it there's no way xD
GameplayXperience 4 months ago in playlist Mais vídeos de Zogrim
@keiluko From what i've heard, a 8800 to physx only can bottleneck your system if you have a high-end ati card.
maikson2 3 months ago
35 people have AMD card.......and it can be seen on the dislike bar perfectly
kanalkunal 4 months ago
DAMNIT! I bought AMD...
4strokecoldsmoke 4 months ago
Fuck ATI RADEON
SlimSRB 4 months ago
If I was Batman, I'd fuck Harley Quinn.
TheMrunmrun 4 months ago
even without physx batman AA is a great game !
petar690 4 months ago
So...from what I'm seeing is that physx just adds a bunch of new graphical elements?
doesn't make me want to buy a machine capable of physx...
WilliamRLBaker 4 months ago
Could do all this with Havok or other physics engines. Designers had some special deal with nVidia? Gamers should not support vendor specific solutions.
eddycurrents 4 months ago
Did anyone else poo themselves when Scarecrow popped up?!
oldfool666 4 months ago
so addicted to challenge mode!
mohsin213jc 5 months ago
with physx lost all designers work.
SafrenRus 5 months ago
changes are massive... thats all. 33 console fags
Victim753 5 months ago
With Physx on, the game crashes after the first scarecrow encounter, when I am trying to open the door :(
Drummerjed 5 months ago
after seeing "dynamic toilet paper"... im buying this game again for PC!
navster87 5 months ago
nvidia rocks
Kosmin0000 5 months ago
In my opinion its just a sweet extra... nothing important though, trust me... you can FULL enjoy this brilliant game on consoles too!
Screep55 6 months ago
ME VENGO XD
deberoll 6 months ago
Lol.
-punches bad guy in lower back-
-bad guy grabs head and falls-
Dethcloxy 6 months ago
just got this game on the Steam sale. Where do I turn on Physx at?
soulassssns 6 months ago
@soulassssns The flash window on startup, before you launch the game, go into the options menu.
kevlar60442 6 months ago
go to ps3
ripper269 6 months ago
Some of it looks a bit over the top (the over-use of fog and the 'easy tear' mattress) but, if used discretely, it could make AA that extra bit more awesome!
Caradog93 6 months ago
what the fuck are those mattresses made of paper?
benry200 6 months ago
theres only one problem with physX and that is that its not profound enough. im one of the biggest physX fans out there and spend all my hours looking for demos or merely pissing around in game with physX entities and whatnot. but look at 90% of these scenes, physx is only being used for like 3 sheets of paper or smashing up tiles. why not have a room covered in paper and have it so that the floor itself can literally be torn up and metal be dented. its fully capable- so why not?
nevasoft2k7 7 months ago 30
@nevasoft2k7 One of the main things I look for in games is PhysX.
LLOYD19851012 6 months ago
@nevasoft2k7 Yes! i love physx it is one of the best things ever! i really cant wait to see what they've done to Arkham city! I totally want to see that
benry200 6 months ago
@nevasoft2k7 Looks pretty significant to me as far as setting the mood goes. If you're looking for "profound" changes on what's essentially a PC version of a console game, you're setting your hopes too high. They already pretty much knew this game was going to kill, so they had no reason to mess with the formula other than to improve the graphics a little.
hitjohnyup 6 months ago
@nevasoft2k7 because most systems cant handle it
guzarche3 5 months ago 34
@guzarche3 They can turn off physx, then.
maikson2 3 months ago
@maikson2 no point in making something only a handfull of people will xp
guzarche3 3 months ago
@guzarche3 You have a point. My system probably can't handle something like this, but they could add this like some kind of extra to people with great gaming rigs.
maikson2 3 months ago
Well, if the game is heavily dependant on PhysX, then only Nvidia users would be able to play it. I guess we wont see these kind of effects like smashing entire walls until AMD comes up with a similar technology for physics calculations
Dhamian 5 months ago
@nevasoft2k7 everything is possible, the thing is that physX takes alot of ram when these things is ON around 40 % more power. they are working on making it looks as good as possible but still make sure computers can run it.
Danuxsy 4 months ago
@nevasoft2k7 everytime you walk over a paper and it goes away the computer is counting it. its not so simple
Danuxsy 4 months ago
@nevasoft2k7
Consoles.
mecher3k 4 months ago
@nevasoft2k7 Because youd need tesselation
keiluko 4 months ago
@nevasoft2k7 Same here!!
SincereCreature 3 months ago
@SincereCreature its damn good to hear people love physx ^^ im taking a gaming course at college so im just hoping to end up making a game in the future and cramming tonnns of physxness in it lol
nevasoft2k7 3 months ago
@nevasoft2k7 Wow! That was a pleasure to "hear" lol Good luck! :D
SincereCreature 3 months ago
@nevasoft2k7 cause nvidea can't pay all devs when there is havok and other better engines,physX is only good with soft materials,but they are all cosmetic.And what's the point if ati has almost other half of users,and they can't contribute to nVidea only physX.Better do factial animations or other cool things.
malganus4 2 months ago
Comment removed
anonimous180 1 month ago
@nevasoft2k7 well, you figure having those 3 pieces of paper cause 10+fps loss imagine how hard it would be to simulate that much. i mean, with physx off i can get full 1080p max setting on my pc at aruond 80+fps, whereas physx drags it down to the 25-40
SushiBoi7 2 weeks ago
yet,another physx that shows Sparkles, yet infamous1 and 2 have huge amount of sparkles effects with dynamid phisics on it all over the place. ,Maybe FF13VERSUS will have Apex . for now...Please show us what kind of goodies L.A noire with have =D
alef321 7 months ago
the dark knight music
MrBassem95 7 months ago
WTF !?
why i didn't have physix on this game ? how can i chage that ?
matanmeyer1396 7 months ago
Wow... You never know what you're actually missing out on when you play the console version until you see a comparison. Sadly, I do not have an Nvidia card, though I'm not in a hurry to get one since I don't do much PC gaming.
deadhand2790 7 months ago
32 people are jealous coz they dont have an nvidia card for physx (sorry for my bad english)
Zock3rB3ast 7 months ago
Can I plug in my Casio calculator for the PhysX?
solobackpacking 7 months ago
While it looks amazing... why are we considering a matress as tearable cloth? XD
LightCaster1 7 months ago
how can i turn it on on the PC?i mean i already finished the story and riddler's chalange but i can't find where to turn it on?off
ssssssssssssssssss50 7 months ago
@ssssssssssssssssss50 there is apatch that adds this feature to the game. also it should be in the options. Just make sure you have a good graphics card capable of running physx. Dont be impressed if you playing seeing s slideshow with your G210 xDD
1337vIKz 7 months ago
"stupid boiler" XD
kazuyamishima1990 7 months ago
3:12
Batman is so awesome, he knocks a bad guy out by punching him in the ass.
Durwood71 7 months ago 2
Comment removed
Janz0r5 7 months ago
EVERY GAME shud have physx but den ati wud b in the dark lol.i love nvidia tho.
TheGeforcefan 7 months ago
@TheGeforcefan Do you really think they need physx to render smog lol? It's all about marketing. There are plenty of articles online about havok and physx. Educate yourself
Lawyer2Junkie 7 months ago
32 personas usan Ati
ivanbiohazard 8 months ago
Is this a joke? Oh no I can't see 100 blocks across the ground :( oh no! Who gives a fuck. Everything is the SAME other than oh no I can't see 500 bricks flying around. Who cares. Who fucking CARES
VigonSaze 8 months ago
@VigonSaze console user? therefore you see no blocks
mitzibishi 7 months ago
ermmm I get fog etc without PhysX on.
qeizen 8 months ago
Comment removed
TheRedPGA 8 months ago
Why switch? I run a 6990 with a 9800GTX+ in a hybrid PhysX setup, and I can maxed out everything settings including PhysX on high with no problem
TheRedPGA 8 months ago
after seeing this I'm switching from ati to nvidia!
hydaway1 8 months ago
Is this self installed or just a game setting? I'm a new gamer
Guitarnerd22 8 months ago
The only thing that bother me about this is that the cloth could be done on an xbox (Splinter Cell Conviction) and even a PS2 (Splinter Cell), theres no doubt a mid range PC could do it without an Nvidia GPU
JuniorProducer1996 8 months ago
@JuniorProducer1996
Pre-animated cloth can be done on just about any system. Dynamically simulated and tearable cloth can not, because all vertices must be simulated every frame. This is very taxing on a CPU, while a GPU with its hundreds of cores can deliver the parallel processing goodness.
cildni 7 months ago
@cildni
I know tearable cloth is a serious challenge, but dynamic cloth that can move around isnt, depending on the amount of subdivisions
JuniorProducer1996 7 months ago
@JuniorProducer1996
That's true, but if the cloth has too few polygons, its movement will look very "edgy". In order for there to be proper folds, you need a certain amount of polygonal detail. I don't believe any non-Physx game has done simulated cloth.
cildni 7 months ago
@cildni
Or at least completely realistic cloth, but they could at least make an effort. we still cant make perfect circles in games, but they still put tires on cars. If they just put a few dynamic cloth things around the game world, I could shut up and get on with my so called life
JuniorProducer1996 7 months ago
So good video and so slow buffer time. Thanks a lot youtube
FINOlmi 8 months ago
excellent video. you earned my thumbs up.
PHYSX fucking owns. PC RULEZ. Consoles are for 12 y/o garbage kids who still suck on their momma's tits.
BIGDADDYF50 8 months ago
@BIGDADDYF50 Can't afford a console? I bet that's your moms PC your using.
Soulja8oyBeats 8 months ago
I think it's just me, I don't like the way cloth moves when it's on the floor. Rest of physx is amazing.
LLOYD19851012 8 months ago
Seems like they could have put those things in easily, but decided to throw it in because they had to use physX or something.. Fishy
Lawyer2Junkie 8 months ago
Humph... pay R$ 400 more here in Brazil for put some more blocks and smokes/steam doesn't worth. But the video is good
magichatake 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
\/IEW |\/|Y Videos For a Real MS Point Gen, Thumbs Up If This Helped You
RhodaSmall6640 8 months ago
too much fog and smoke seem to scare me...
darkchoco212 9 months ago
8:30 spider man was here
ahahahahahahahahaa 9 months ago
I now noticed that maybe the PhysX settings aren't on high in my game because I can't break floor tiles and wall tiles in my game, even though the menu shows up as "high" but I keep getting the error saying my card doesn't support hardware-accelerated PhysX.
MoonOvIce 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why cant i play this game with Phsyx on High Settings with a msi gtx 460 with latest [v270] nvidia beta drivers? why? papers are freezing in air, no steam, no moving spider webcows e.t.c - after watching this video i just go crazy playing with settings and stuff, but those fucking papers still freeze in mid air... Phsyx on normal Settings is fine, but i want the real deal! ;D
please help a german confused gamer out bros...
and why does Alien vs Predator 3 crash sometimes on the same spots^^?
Z3R00NE 9 months ago
I really don't like PhysX much (and I have a Nvidia gpu), all of this stuff can be easily done on a modern day cpu
TheColorfulPube 9 months ago
@TheColorfulPube no it cant! the architecture of the gpu is totaly different compared to a cpu, a gpu can calculate that stuff like 50 times faster than a cpu! trust me, its goood ;D
Z3R00NE 9 months ago
WOW WOW WOW!!!!!!!!
v40688457 9 months ago
I am rather shocked by how poorly this game works with out having hardware accelerated physics.
Why get rid of the objects entirely when there is no hardware physics support? what is wrong with having the player walk through the cobwebs, leaving them as just static objects that are not collided with? I accept the generally a card that does not have hardware physics will tend to be low power as well, but transparency is a standard feature for GPUs.
thecoshman 9 months ago
@thecoshman Which card do you have? all Nvidia cards from the 8 series and up have hardware-accelerated PhysX built in by default.
MoonOvIce 9 months ago
@MoonOvIce erm... think you missed my point there mate.
thecoshman 9 months ago
This is far better than Mafia 2's PhysX implementation.In that game,the difference is neglegible.
Silenthunter287 10 months ago
its good thing i got a gts or else i would have to play without the falling rocks or the badass kickable toilet paper
TheWorldIsYoursxxX 10 months ago
@TheWorldIsYoursxxX You got a GTS 250? me too, I get that stupid message that says my card doesn't support hardware-accelerated physx but it obviously does, as I ran the game with Physx on high and it ran fine and the physx actually work...I only have the 512mb version for now but will upgrade very soon...
MoonOvIce 9 months ago
@MoonOvIce i have a gts 450 1 gb
TheWorldIsYoursxxX 9 months ago
Batham Arkham City will be better PhysX . :D
NikoBellicSerbia30 10 months ago
fucking hell, that looks realistic! :D
Ienstien965 10 months ago 3
Are the PhysX off on consoles??
Screep55 10 months ago
@Screep55 It's quite simple.. consoles are old, and therefore almost every PC game has to be tuned down for the consoles.. physX is NOT possible for consoles without a massive fps drop.
qv9r8n 10 months ago
@Screep55 there is no physx for consoles at all! :p
anderas 10 months ago
@anderas man this sucks ):
Screep55 10 months ago
@Screep55 yes, pc only
colpictures 10 months ago
does someone know where can I find a Crack and keygen for this:(? I looked evyrewhere...
LostShadow901 10 months ago
@LostShadow901
Just fucking go and bye the game kid. or you doesnt have 10 bugs?
MaRdErN 10 months ago
@MaRdErN kid,in your country its worth ten bucks,in mine is different because u have other earnings,so If I would have ten bucks like u say i would buy it!
LostShadow901 10 months ago
@LostShadow901
Chill out kid.... how expensive is the game in your country? is belgium a 3th world land? no!? then just import the game from play.com for 6,50 euros and be happy, if you are to dump to use google for finding a crack...
MaRdErN 10 months ago
@MaRdErN you are smart,I see you can use google very well but you can't read corectly. to dumm to search for crack? if you think a normal person could in times like these not use google to look for it,who is dummy? Think clear,Dude,I come from what? Damn,you are still a child pretending to be a more adult then U think U are. If I can,I will buy,If I can't I won't. I would like to,but its my desicion,judging someone in this case is a fucking funny thing you know?
LostShadow901 10 months ago
@LostShadow901
You asked for a crack or didnt you? so for me you are to dump to use google.. and dont be naive, "normal" person still cant use google. many need 10min or Hours to find what they are searching for(read you first post again!). But if you know how it works, it will take less then 10sec. You have Internet, you think you have a PC rig(min.250$) to run this game, but you didn't have 5 -10$ for a game?
MaRdErN 10 months ago
@LostShadow901
its hard to believe but ok i believe you. i dont know you so i cant judge you, sorry for that but for the future to avoid this, learn to search for yourself or go to a pirate forum and ask them for help. peace and chill out...
MaRdErN 10 months ago
they should have the spider web in SKYRIM
Spulpacz 11 months ago
LOL!!!! BLOCK PAPER ON 6:03!! O.O
Eduardogd2 11 months ago
looks good, but playing Batman:AA on a PC? lol no thanks.
minxamo 11 months ago
@minxamo ever head of controller? :D
fredhell13 11 months ago
@fredhell13 i think you need to rephrase that.
minxamo 11 months ago
@minxamo look like a cod player who say fps on consoles are better. alway make me laugh
mat967 11 months ago
@minxamo Why wouldn't anyone want to play Batman: AA on PC? It's a great PC game with PhysX. Also you can get a much higher resolution/frame-rate on PC compared to 720p/30fps on Consoles.
KrazyK1289 9 months ago
@KrazyK1289 That and for people who don't like using mouse and keyboard for this game (which is highly recommended and better, I also played the console versions) you can still use a gamepad for this game without any issues, and an Xbox 360 controller no less!
MoonOvIce 9 months ago
thats awsome
scousereddy2468 11 months ago
Very realistc wet paper flying =P
rafaelborven 1 year ago
музыка из периметра люто порадовала!
DeltaDesignRus 1 year ago 8
@DeltaDesignRus O.O? Translate please.
Eduardogd2 11 months ago
@Eduardogd2 The music in this video from a game "Perimeter"
DeltaDesignRus 11 months ago
I have SLI setup, the best parts are the Sacrecrow section, it really add to the atmosphere, without it, it sucks. But that one of the only game that actually use the technology so..
ryoohki360 1 year ago
What's the point? Everyone played this game in detective mode all the way through anyway...
Matat 1 year ago
@Matat
haha, sad but true :P
I played it without physix, because some of the effects are really ridiculous (the floor is breaking even if you step on it, FOG EVERYWHERE).
kthy0056 1 year ago
could not figure out the specs of pc running this can u post them ?
uploader251 1 year ago
no iam not going to buy an nvidia card only for physx (fingers crossed)
uploader251 1 year ago
Will physx be incorporated in batman: arkham city?
gagetmorris 1 year ago
@gagetmorris of course dude!!!
GameAddictDude 1 year ago
Annoying thing, most of that stuff could have been implemented, even if it had to be faked, without the need for it to be full physically simulated. I mean, you can't hardly tell the steam and fog is doing anything other than a sprite based approach on PS2 couldn't handle. There's no need for there to be physics applied to most of that stuff.
retread01 1 year ago
Now I realize it looks like shit on Xbox 360... ¬¬
shinjiikarir 1 year ago
epic. its shit like this that brings keeps technology evolving. xbox and ps33 are frozen in time XD
staplerjm 1 year ago 27
@staplerjm não levaram o ps3 ao limite, ainda.
brunovoxxx 1 year ago
@staplerjm ps3 uses nvidia, so im pretty sure it has physx
yeehaw789 1 year ago
@yeehaw789 Nope
ChuckNorrisLuvsBoosh 1 year ago
@yeehaw789 No, physix is pc only, no console can handle it, they where not made for it. It's like AA, not a console posibilty.
DarkProject 1 year ago
@DarkProject
There are console titles with Physx, just not insane amounts like this. There are also plenty of console games with AA, even Crysis 2 has it's own form of AA on consoles (though it's crap compared to the kind of AA the PC can do).
randir14 11 months ago
@randir14 Yeah i found out about it 5 days ago when watching a "making off" from an xbox game, turns out they can go up to 16X aa, with some tricks/ tho mostly its 4X which is more than enough.
DarkProject 11 months ago
@DarkProject I'm not sure you're correct on this one. Its not the "PC" that can handle it. Its the video card. Because no matter how much cash you invest in a PC, if all you're using is on board video you're not even touching PS2 quality.
Now if customers were willing to pay $1000 for a console, I have no doubt that it could do everything seen here, maybe even more.
cpu64 11 months ago
@staplerjm The 360 keeps games from evolving. developers have to deal with 5 year old technology. If PC was still the dominant gaming platform games would be light years ahead.
HDaviator 1 year ago
@HDaviator
yeah and you'd probably have to upgrade your video card every 3 months just to run the game at 60fps at the minimum setting
Iplay2win 1 year ago
@Iplay2win strange a my 470 runs every game max at 60 fps.. and a 5970 would also max any game and 60 fps.. strange...
henryhenriquez 1 year ago
@staplerjm thing with this is...on pc you have to worry about min spec. A min spec pc probably can't pull these effects with a good frame rate so these effects only improve the immersion and nothing else
Crysis was also held back a lot due to min specs especially the Ice areas
LOLMAN22 1 year ago
@staplerjm maybe... But they still manage to pull off some pretty awesome stuff that unfortunately probably won't be on PC anytime soon. I don't think you should say one platform is better than the other because each one brings a piece of the cake to the table. Yeah sure today's PCs are way more powerful than the consoles. But you still get really good looking and fun games on the latter.
Wallrunna 1 year ago
@staplerjm you are frozen in time
megaonan 10 months ago
@staplerjm i love my 360, but you're right, PC is just so damn amazing, especiall with my newly upgraded rig with the GTX 580!!!! it totally kicks ass
aimannorzahariwod 9 months ago
3:15 the infamous ass punch... deadly to any enemy of the Bat Man.
mbe102 1 year ago 21
The rag dolls remind me of the Battlefield 2 ones, the really early stuff before they became very prevalent in gaming today. Super jiggly and extremely loose. Hilarious, nothing wrong with them though.
mbe102 1 year ago
Man, I played this on console when I had a computer perfectly capable of handling this game. I really missed out on some great atmosphere.
Chimerathon 1 year ago 5
omg this make ps3 and xbox 360 look like shit lol
tolow16 1 year ago 2
How about you give us realistic fighting physics with all that GPU power, instead of dynamic paper.
SOSLICK22 1 year ago 3
isn't there any way on amd
ehab007bob 1 year ago