Jane Standley took a leave of absence because too many people were asking her about this report. Really? No kidding Jane. You're an investigative reporter - who put these words in your mouth Jane? We're talking murder on a grand scale and you know where to start looking!
Don't get me wrong, I'm dubious about the official story of how and why this all happened. But why would this reporter have inside knowledge? Surely the odds are that this is simply a confused mistake?
I thought Wikileaks was gonna drop a huge 9/11 cable and shake things up! but he hasn't, what is Wikileaks waiting for!?!? We need a leak about 9/11 being an inside job or this truth movement is gonna fizzle out like a candle without oxygen.
how do you know exactly what time this was being broadcast? There is no time clock any where on the picture. ..Im not saying i dont believe it was demolished because I agree there are some strange facts that dont add up. Did u know Silverstein made $7,000,000,000 from this tragedy!!!
BBC is not part of any conspiracy. TV talking heads report what "sources" meaning government officials tell them. No doubt a government flunky told them it had fallen; no doubt he was confused. No doubt SOME government official knew it would be brought down by controlled demolition. DEMOLISHED FOR SAFETY was the FIRST official story; later some sissy official decided to go with the lame "fire collapse" excuse. Now they are stuck with it.
@Skeptic121 How was it demolished though? Did some demolition workers just manage to place charges all the way up this skyscraper, whilst a whole bunch of debris and suffocating dust was blasting out of the other two towers, in a matter of nearly an hour? Maybe a little more. I have seen how much time and preperation it takes to blow a chimbley. I imagine it takes even longer to destroy a skscraper.
@OinkLove100 In the famous CNN video we see the construction workers walking out of WTC Seven; one of them says "Keep your eye on that building; it'll be coming down" and another says "the building's gonna blow up" Apparently, they were sent in to do a quick demolition job, perhaps with some devices from the military. Remember, IF very hot thermate could NOT bring down WTC7, how could fires? One cannot have it both ways!
The military does have technology that civilians don't....
@giannaluva65 I was responding to a point that claims a quick demolition job, which I feel is ludicrous. My point is that it was planned. It had to have been planned. And it was taken down just after the other two towers had been planned.
....as Joel Stein STATED just last year.....'i do not care if the American people think...WE (Jews)....Run and Control...the FED, the Banks, WallStreet, The Media, Hollywood and the Government....as long as...WE (Jews)...GET TO KEEP RUNNING THEM."
The big question is when will those responsible be held accountable for their actions? Will it every come out, if this as I believe is, the inconsolable truth? WTC7, No plane hit this building.
SALIVA DRUG TESTS: Are going to be used by the police here in michigan to determine whether someone is under the influence after being pulled ever for traffic violations. opioids, marijuana, methamphetamine, cocaine, and others.
I'm starting to get really sick and tired of the truth deniers, if you accept 9/11 as told on the news and in the official report, then you may as well order your RFID chip online now
Hmmm. BBC World usally has a clock on display showing the live-time which isn't actually in this video. Did the uploaders remove it to fake the video or did the BBC remove it when this was going out?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You know that building collapsed 7 hours after the second twin tower? It was heavily damaged from both tower collapses. Everyone thought it was going to collapse. Drop the conspiracy theory.
actually yeah, and m not saying it was the federal government, but that is because m into conspiracy theories. cuz if people were like "yeah it was all bush and dick" then hell no, they are not capable, but i think it was bigger than that
This is real incriminating evidence that youtube keeps removing. BBC news is NOT TO BE TRUSTED!!!
Look at what your eyes and ears tell you.
This is not a conspiracy "theory" it's a real conspiracy and the BBC IS IN ON IT!!!
The WHO is planning to exterminate the population using forced deadly weaponised H1N1 contaminated swine flu vaccines and they ARE going ahead with it. WHERE IS THE NEWS COVERAGE ON THAT STOREY THEN????
911 was NOT done by jews, nor was it done by mainstreme Zionists. The people who made it happen are a very small group of financial elites, SOME of whom happen to be jewish zionists. Don't be racist against all jews because a dozen of them are horribly evil. If five Hindu guys shoot up a school killing 50 people, do we start going around saying all Hindu people are the devil? I think not. People are just anti-semetic. Not much has changed since the Holocaust, it seems, not enough lessonsLearned.
how do you know? where do you get the information ? do you work for US government? are you 100% certain? Are you absolutely sure what you have just said? where is the evidence?
Yeah, everyone should watch the dvd, The truth about 911. It is really good, it goes into great detail, probably the best 911 documentary you'll ever see.
Dont get me wrong, there is something very fishy about the war and how bush gave all the best contracts to his vice presidents old company, but the idea that "the man" fucked up on such a large scale as to inform the bbc too early about a building collapse which was part of their master plan. come on...
gidsum29 none of what you say explains this early broadcast.when pieces of evidence like this come along people like you sideskirt the issue and start talking about other aspects of the above issue eventually totally deviating away from the original issue.most people who go back and read your comments will prob think you are a fool
the windsor building did NOT collapse..DUMBASS!also comparing the windsor to building 7 or the twin towers is like comparing oranges and apples.building 7 and the towers were both 100% steel frames.the windsor was framed primarily in steel-reinforced concrete,there is a HUGE difference.anyways like i said the windsor did not collapse and i dont know why you feel the need to lie AGAIN by saying it did.again your argument is redundent...DUMBASS
You people are grasping at straws now. The collapse of WTC7 was NO SURPRISE; not only because of the extensive damage to the south side from the north towers collapse, but it burned for 8 hours without a drop of water. The building was leaning in the hours before the collapse. The fact that it WAS leaning disproves a controlled demolition.
the building was leaning?if you watch footage of the building collapsing youll see that it comes straight down like a controlled demolition.According to the government, fires, primarily, leveled this building, but fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper
LIAR.fires have NEVER destroyed a steel skyscraper before.go do your research as i suggest everybody reading this does.dont take anything for granted unless you can back it up with your own research.go google any of these steel skyscraper fires:The One Meridian Plaza Fire,The First Interstate Bank Fire,Caracas Tower Fire,1 New York Plaza Fire.
"About 60% of the 60 columns of the impacted face of framed-tube were severed, and many more were significantly deflected. This caused stress redistribution, which significantly increased the load of some columns, near the load capacity for some of them."
This meant the towers were near collapse from the impact alone. At this point, the fire weakened the remaining supports. (Steel has no strength when even modestly heated & the fire-proofing had been blown off by the impact)
At 9:49 a.m., the ten-ton, B-25 bomber smashed into the north side of the Empire State Building. The majority of the plane hit the 79th floor, creating a hole in the building eighteen feet wide and twenty feet high. The plane's high-octane fuel exploded, hurtling flames down the side of the building and inside through hallways and stairwells all the way down to the 75th floor.this happened july 28th 1945.A 10 TON B-25 BOMBER hit and the last time i checked the esb was still there
Im a fool???? I cant believe your comparing a B-25 that was going LESS than 100mph and is 290tons lighter than a 767-200......Do you know what velocity is? These two events DONT COMPARE and you know it. Easy on the drama idiot........Heres a little experiment.....pump a bb gun once and shoot yourself in the leg, NOW pump it 15 times...GET IT DUMBASS! You cant be that stupid.
ok,first off you say building 7 fell because of fire,then when i said that no steel skyscraper has ever collapsed because of fire you call me a liar and say the opposite.then you tell me to go and watch a video on youtube(even allthough you are implying above that you tube videos do not make you smart!)i then reply with names and places and you shift the discussion from building 7 to the twin towers.who are you trying to convince?me or yourself?
Exacty! The top ten floors of the windsor building COLLASED because it was the only part of the building that WASNT concrete reinforced...the only thing that didnt collapse was the concrete inner core. THATS THE POINT DUMBASS! concrete is a good insulater of fire and bare steel is a excellent CONDUCTOR! You said YOURSELF that the WTC had 100% steel frames right? THINK!
Actually steel framed buildings have collapsed from fire alone. That's why every steel-frame building on the face of the earth has fire-proofing around the steel, to protect it.
ALSO:
Whether or not any steel-frame building ever collapsed from fire alone is irrelevant to the Twin Tower collapse.
The towers mainly collapsed due to the large number of supports being knocked out by the jets. The remaining supports had to bear the weight, almost to their load limit.
no steel frame buildings have collapsed before.LIAR.why dont you name these so called buildings becuase i have found none in my research.also to say whether fire has caused the collapse of a steel builing is irrelevent to the twin towers is poppycock and you know it..also the official explenation for the towers coming down was FIRE coupled with the damage done by the aircraft.anyways last time i checked we were talking about building 7?
The internal supports thus bent and sagged downward. This pulled in the perimeter columns. In fact, photographs of the Towers show the exterior columns bending inward, & this is clear evidence that the steel inside was failing. The exterior columns then snapped inward & collapse ensued.
The internal supports thus bent and sagged downward. This pulled in the perimeter columns. In fact, photographs of the Towers show the exterior columns bending inward, & this is clear evidence that the steel inside was failing. The exterior columns then snapped inward & collapse ensued.
the twin towers were designed to withstand impact from a plane.go check out what the designers have to say about the twin towers.also when fire crews first arrived at the scene of tower 1 they reconed that 2 lines (hoses)would be sufficient to put out the fire.also anybody with half a brain whos watched footage of the towers collapsing can see for themselves that the buildings collapse from the bottom
All of this talk about policing is crazy. Like... think about it.think about all the corrupt corporations and oil companies. think about the criminals.Think about that big crime in the 1900's that led to the Federal reserve.I mean from a guy stealing bread on the street to the senators accepting bribes for their own interests.. to the 10% of people who own this country... Crime is always going to be around. You cant police the ppl who really need to be policed. It will always exist. face it.
You know what, I don't believe everything that has been told to us by our goverment, but this is clearly a newscaster speaking in front of old footage. Tell me that the plane over penn. was shot down, I say YES it was but to think that our government has esp, I say give me a break. Common people spend your energy looking at the real facts that are killing us and less time with this garbage.
You know... I hate it that we can persuade everyone to think the way we do. 2 out of 4 people wont believe that the MSM would actually LIE to us on TV... U can say what u want to them. they are already brainwashed red white and blue americans... Can't change an idiot. I just wish America would wakeup and figure out that if we don't act now our children will suffer for something the generation before wouldnt take care of. I respect you people who really KNOW the TRUTH. Thanks alot guys.. We know.
Oh yeah, and what a lying bitch. Someone on the Internet should get a interview with her and forcefully ask her WTF was going on. Sure the government will kill her but fack it... it would be worth it.
i am as you would expect given my user name, very aware of henleys lyrics in the song. i too feel that sending troops to fight a war poorly equipped and poorly informed,while there are fat cats back in the usa burning money for fun is bad. that doesnt mean it isnt a war that needs fighting. i am of the opinion that a centralised world controlling force that doesnt involve islamic extremists is a good idea. whether they accually blew up the towers or not i dont know i doubt it as you do...
Don't believe the hype you see on TV. Now I see where our difference of opinion is coming from. I too believe you to be a good person but also believe your mind has been led up the garden path (as mine was). To see the news, throw your television out the window and start again.
As a footnote, I do not have a lot of doubt as to whether they did it themselves. In fact I would go as far as saying they are as guilty as sin itself. This is one of the main reasons I do not trust the chip considering the issuers would be this pack of p..... We need a balnce of power and right now because of complacency we have let it slip way too far. The chip is where I must draw a line in the sand that I am prepared to defend with my life.
oh have no worries i am under no illusions of the censored tripe that comes from murdocks boxes.the attrocities of 911 can never be excused but. the final result is what is important.you think we can leave these highly fanatical religious groups in the east to themselves,of course not.until the centralised world government comes to be.these crazies were prepared to kill a english teacher who called a teddy bear mohammed,but the crazy fkrs think it ok to name 90% of themselves by that name.
Really with the amount of corruption going on, maybe the chip should be placed on high ranking officials first and thier movements tracked by us and displayed in the main square of every major city we live. Lets start there and also tap thier phones and start recording the conversation they have in every room they walk in. Another point. If you have nothing to hide then why don't we put a camera in our living rooms to keep us safe from people building weapons and holding grandma hostage?
you mis interpret my meaning, when i say you and me that is simplifying it i mean people and authority, ok you are honest no problem however as i said you arent known personally by authority,so we have to assume that anyone is capable of anything,as we see everyday, how often do you hear someone say, "such a nice person we lived next door to him for 20 years we never thought he would do something like that"yes it is extreme but the world is full of extremists so we have to combat it.
very clever, but lets have it this way we have a segment of footage lost at the bbc, knowing this a certain person who recorded it has edited the building into his footage and posted it on the net the bbc cannot disprove it because as we know the footag was lost. is there any other footage of any other station anywhere in the world that got this timed wrong, show me.
Thanks to "Loose Change" video documentary, The American economy right now, Alex Jones, and David Icke among other brave activists (National Heros). People are slowly but seriously beginning to wake up to the truth. Okay people, now seriously watch : "The Bohemina Gove" -U-tube video investigation by Alex Jones, get a clue to what our leadership has been up to for the last few centuries (this is no conspiracy, this is the truth!)
thats not a window behind her its a tv screen, and she didn't guesse it before it happened the was a time lag in the video behind her. thats why it hadn't fallin in the background yet.
Dissent is the highest form of patriotism. I just noticed your Australian. If you think for a second, that we're under the radar of the greater picture, think again. Enjoy your microchip. The day they sell the microchip to you and you take it to keep you safe, think of me and what I was trying to tell you. I'd sooner die than accept that thing.
would you not like to think that if your young son or daughter was abducted there would be some way of finding them. or trace murderers rapists and other such scum. there is far more to microchips than the big brother paranoia.
And there you have the classic sell people. The manipulation of fear and hate to make us want the chip. Wow, it is actually working. Just when you thought "has if we would accept that."
isnt that what governments are supposed to do protect us from our fears,you think if you change the controlling forces the scumbags of this earth will magically dissapear, your solution as to ridding us of them ,if your preferred choice takes charge is something i would be glad to hear.
The job of my government to protect my safety is supposed to be through police numbers, not cameras and chips. More taxes are being paid than ever before yet the money gets squandered on rubbish. Even according to the official story a microchip could not have prevented 911. They all had valid passports. I as a human being have the RIGHT to walk down the street anonymously. The abuse of governmental power has been shown time & time again through history, the chip gives them a lot more leverage.
The other problem is that governments are first creating our fears (911) in order to pursue thier objective of planting chips in us. Which shows me the same people telling me that the chip would be good are the MURDERER SCUMBAGS it is supposed to protect me from. Thanks but no thanks.
If I as a civilian want to lie about where I am today to say, my employer, then I should be able to.
Eventually we will all have access to each others chip locations, so they won't even have to police us. We will police each other. The few elitists will simply collect money and have a self governing system where we oppress each other under the disguise of some sort of work ethic.
If we misbehave and point out that it has taken a lot of unity away from humanity and become dangerous, they could hunt us down quickly or simply turn off the chip. There are a million reasons why the chip is bad.
very logical but you talk about fears, every word is based on your fears, some secret society doing this, governments plotting to deceive us that, police states etc etc etc, you are using "peoples fears" in your own arguement.we dont live in an ideal world. great to think we walk down the street annonymously,however there are millions of nasty people in this world who would not think twice of ignoring your human rights for financial gain/sick pleasure.that is why we need it.
more police numbers?, so we put one on every street corner in every nook and cranny where your scumbags are at work.millions of police and a 400% increase in taxes to pay for them all and what use? police used to command some kind of respect not anymore they just shoot them.using the arguement,if i to lie to my boss as a reason for your annonymity, what else? i have the right to theive and rob and deal drugs,stab a kid or mug a granny without someone looking over my shoulder.
whoever runs the world is irrelevant, it will still need policing, manpower doesnt work it isnt working now and never has, and crime gets worse and worse,you arent known personally by your government so they have to assume anyone is capable of anything at anytime, if you have nothing to hide whats your problem, looking at it from the standpoint of i cant be dishonest if i'm chipped is not quite an arguement is it.
Police are dealing with less officers per capita than ever before. So how would you know if numbers aren't working? I don't have to be honest with you as to where I am as it's none of your business.I am not a criminal and will not be tracked like one. Hey, you wanna catch a murderer of thousands of people. Start with the whitehouse, he didn't have to be microchipped for me to ascertain that now did he?
I'm not sure what the taxes are being wasted on in your country, unless its the U.S., in which case it would be wars based on lies. Oh here we go, chucking a sickie at work can lead to mass murder. Regular comedian. Nobody has the right to track me and it's a freedom I will NEVER give up. It is none of your or anyone elses business where I am, how much money I have, medical history, school grades. It may become your business when I am convicted. It can be looked up with current technology.
Have you seen the vid at the top of this screen? Is that based on fears or fact. The same people who want us to be chipped are the scumbags. We do not need a chip. It is immoral to force that ideal on anyone. Let me guess, you have already got one? I don't want my records to be accessed by people without my permission. I am not a criminal, nor do I have a criminal record. What your asking me to do is trust the issuer. I refer you to the vid at the top of the screen again?
Thats really ironic that you would even debate this stuff considering your profile name is longroadoutofeden. Perhaps you should listen carefully to the lyrics of a song with the same title by the eagles and the message it's trying to give on how the elitist bankers (who are the same big push behind the chip) are dividing this country a little finer amongst themselves at our expense.
This video fails to show the actual time. There were still reports that the building may collapse because of the interior fire and damage. This is why it was let to burn. It's easy to mess up this information.
And I can't believe that people actually believe this "press release" garbage. The press wasn't in on this. There is no way the government could have carried out this large of an attack. There is too much evidence that supports what happened. 19 terrorists killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11.
hi thanks for your recommendation - I read the fire fighter's testimony re building 7 and whilst I don't believe the media was in on it, its very hard to belive that building 7 would fall into its own footprint (even with the bulge between 10-12). cheers
Yeah, lets trust official sources, our government is here to serve and protect us:) If it was evacuated for several hours, how did they ascertain from several hundred metres that it had collapsed 23 mins in the future????????????????
I think you'll find it was completely evacuated earlier that day. How could they ascertain from several hundred metres away that it was soon to collapse.
She's probably a reptilian who exists only on David Icke's mind, and somehow it's projected on YouTube as a common video. I can't see any other possible explanation for that...
"Not only that, the BBC admits it on thier website. They say on there that it was because of a cock up, not because of a conspiracy"
WRONG
They say that they had no advanced knowledge that the towers were going to fall & that nobody was feeding them information or telling them what to say
They acknowledge that people claim this is not true but the refute that claim
The 'cock up' they refer to is that they lost the original copy of the tape
But we have it here on youtube so it doesn't matter
Poor Jayne, first time ever the BBC were exclusive on a story! Pity it was 20 minutes early! Oh well, they do say everyone gets their 20 minutes of fame, bet she didn't expect it to be like this!!! ~Q~
And,to Jayne Standley,maybe she should have "confirmed" that WTC 7 was actually down just as she was so eager to make sure that the reports of injured police officers were "confirmed" before she stated it as fact!
Wtc 7 was a controlled demolition,the BBC were issued with a press release and they just read it out on LIVE tv,unfortunately for the BBC,they didnt check if the pre planned controlled demolition had actually taken place yet!And the result was this live broadcast from New York with WTC 7 still standing! Controlled demolition of WTC 7,unfortunately,points to 9/11 not being a surprise attack after all.
Every news service in the entire world works for the bush administration?
Even so why would he risk giving them the press releases early?
What possible purpose cold it serve other than to allow you to stumble on his sinister plan?
Do you think he left a train of 911 bread crumbs for you to follow?
Did it ever occur to you that the reason why the author of this video chose a segment that contained absolutly no reference to what time it is so that he could just make up the times he listed?
Because a spokesman for the BBC trying to defend itself (poorly as it turned out) confirmed that,yes,this was genuine live footage from the day.They also confirmed that the BBC had lost all of its archived live footage of 9/11 shortly after this segment was unearthed! The BBC!!!. Be suspicious.Ask questions,Do some research.Something stinks to high heaven!!!
haha, What do you mean there is no proof look up truth 911, there are firefighter that heard and saw explosions. I think your afraid just like most people to hear the truth. "herbzilla11" you find a way to dismiss the possibility that this so called free county is F#$ken lying to you. Be a man/women and open your eyes, or are you one of those who until the world is going to end, or when the truth comes out you act still can't believe. puss..
There is no proof that the station was not using an old recording and just throwing up a blue screen behind her to make it look like they had a reporter on the scene.
I did not see anything on the video to indicate the time.
And I an not ever totally sure that you are pointing at the right building with your arrow.
Some people are so desperate to believe in conspiracies that they abandon every last shred of critical thinking and blindly believe 100% of what they hear no questions asked.
I would need to see a detailed area map to be sure the building being pointed at was actually WTC 7
And even if the tower is up in the back ground, news channels use none-live feeds all the time, there is no gaurantee that the images behind the women speaking are live/ in real time.
CTers are an inherently dishonest bunch and I'll believe the the statments about this video when I see the proof.
I know, this video isn't good proof as there is no time scale and some ambiguities. However, I was /sarcasming your statement:
"they abandon every last shred of critical thinking and blindly believe 100% of what they hear no questions asked"
I have no idea how you can possess critical thinking and NOT question the happenings of 9/11. I was 12 when it happened and even then could clearly tell it was a demolition. And I am not "inherently dishonest", thank you.
Well I was in college getting my physics degree when I saw 911 and I could tell that it was a structural collapse brought on by massive failures in the buildings supports caused by a jumbo jet crashing into them, damaging the on the steel supports beams and then dumping tens of thousands of gallons of jet fuel into the tower and cooking its insides for a hour and forty minutes.
wow this is fucking unbelievable, there is sooooo much evidence to suggest the official story was false. Im glad the elite underestimate us, the public, they think they can just feed us bullshit stories and we'll keep buying it, the country is waking up and they dont even know it
the BBC sucks, they took out multi billion pound loans from 'european banks', so I've been reading in the papers. And they deny it. LOL. We're destined for a MASS wake up sometime soon. Could 2012 be a mass awakening for us all?
yessir i really think it will be 2012. By the time the american union comes into play, the dollar is disbanded for the Amero, and the real id act and RFID chipping is in play, people will see this is far from folklore.
I don't think 2012 will be a specific event, but more just a realisation, maybe the truth will come out in public, finally.
The evidence is staggering against the official story, and yet there is 0 evidence SUPPORTING the official story...it's truly pathetic. I cant believe anyone still believes arabs in caves crashed planes into buildings.
ya dude seriously. talk about denial. these r the same people who want to still debate shit like whther or not smoking is bad for you. their is no debate to be had
bbc is owned ... billions of dollars are payed to the chiefs of the media to tell what THEY want YOU to know ! ASSHOLES,how can you still believe your stupid fuckin government,after all this years , you simply DENY the TRUTH , in this case,i really HOPE somebody will come and kill all you , 2 stupid 2 deserve 2 live ! many people are dying because you don`t do something with that stupid cowboy that runs your world,assholes....
Its the Salamon Brothers building. It collapsed supposedly from the debris from wtc 1 & 2 8 hours later. FBI & CIA had offices in it. Jane Standley is reporting it as collapsed BEFORE it had actually collapsed. If you think its a blue screen then check out the reflective wall to the left of the screen. Keep in mind 1:This is the building where Larry Silverstein said "Pull it" 2. The length of time it takes to put explosives to make a building implode. 3. The BBC has lost the footage.
The BBC sais on their own website "We lost the footage not because of a conspiracy, just a cock up""If anyone has the footage we'd like to see it" Look up Jane Standley after wtc7. This is the first video that woke me up a few months ago. I cannot look at the world the same way I used to. I can't look at the news the same. I now have a youtube channel with 47 videos. My masterpiece is "David Icke tears apart 9-11" part 1 to part 14.
what is the matter with you people WAKE UP!!! do some research on 9/11... people laugh at David Icke he predicted this years before 2001 but everyone is BLIND and unwilling to do anything just wait till you regret your ignorant decisions this presidential election is so important it's freightening I live in Canada and im fearing for my kids... before you vote make sure you get your facts straight RESEARCH educate your self GOOD LUCK ... read up Ron Paul REVOLUTION IS NOW
No steel skyscraper has been tested with tons of jet fuel either. So before you open your big mouth, why dont you consider the physics behind it. Easy to believe in something when you dont understand it. So think a little more, what structural damage is done in a fire... none... how bout a plane crash, lots... also consider the building, if your not an engineer you should not judge how something happens, because most likely your not smart enough to figure it out
Plenty of physicists *have* tested the physics. Plane hitting buildings? Try a B52 hitting the Empire State building in 1945. No building collapse. Also, you do not have to be an engineer to know that buildings do not fall at free fall speed into the path of *most* resistance.
Once again, you not being an engineer, you have skipped over some major factor, and concluded that its impossible for a building to fall in the so called "path of most resistance." While you are correct that a B52 hit the Empire states building, you are incorrect to conclude that such an example compares to that of the World Trade Center. First of all
Once again you have misconstrued the scenario and I am guessing you're not a structural engineer; correct me if I am wrong. Sure a B52 hit the Empire State building in 1945. Now let's consider the differences. First of all the B52 which struck the building was traveling a much slower rate of speed. Second the amount of fuel on board was significantly less. Third the fuel which the B52 used in 1945 burned at a much lower maximum temperature rate then that of current Jet A-1 fuel.
Now let's compare the buildings. The Empire State's building is constructed in a way I which the weight of the building is evenly supported throughout the construction sight. The World Trade Center however was built in way in which the weight of the entire structure was supported through the perimeter, to create an open floor plan.
Jane Standley took a leave of absence because too many people were asking her about this report. Really? No kidding Jane. You're an investigative reporter - who put these words in your mouth Jane? We're talking murder on a grand scale and you know where to start looking!
BUGBOY10000 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
a plane didnt hit but down it comes.
Any rubble was all on one side so that makes all the rest ofit collapse evenly.
the offiicial story is totaly stupid#
especially as they didnt test for explosives.
zenoist2 2 months ago
Don't get me wrong, I'm dubious about the official story of how and why this all happened. But why would this reporter have inside knowledge? Surely the odds are that this is simply a confused mistake?
nichotom 4 months ago
satan say reveal himself soon...
XFreeXYourXMindX 9 months ago
thats not the WTC ya retard
MrCrusader363 10 months ago 2
They needed a reason to invade Afghanistan, 911 was it.
They needed a reason to invade Iraq, WMD was it.
Bullshit never gets old...
VerifyVolatile 11 months ago
I thought Wikileaks was gonna drop a huge 9/11 cable and shake things up! but he hasn't, what is Wikileaks waiting for!?!? We need a leak about 9/11 being an inside job or this truth movement is gonna fizzle out like a candle without oxygen.
zanzabarify 11 months ago
@zanzabarify I seriously doubt it.
BiteTheBigOne2342 4 months ago
the pole on top of the tower isnt there. epic fail
peggy8910 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how do you know exactly what time this was being broadcast? There is no time clock any where on the picture. ..Im not saying i dont believe it was demolished because I agree there are some strange facts that dont add up. Did u know Silverstein made $7,000,000,000 from this tragedy!!!
showboyninner 1 year ago
Comment removed
showboyninner 1 year ago
BBC is not part of any conspiracy. TV talking heads report what "sources" meaning government officials tell them. No doubt a government flunky told them it had fallen; no doubt he was confused. No doubt SOME government official knew it would be brought down by controlled demolition. DEMOLISHED FOR SAFETY was the FIRST official story; later some sissy official decided to go with the lame "fire collapse" excuse. Now they are stuck with it.
Demolished for safety might actually be true!
Skeptic121 1 year ago
@Skeptic121 How was it demolished though? Did some demolition workers just manage to place charges all the way up this skyscraper, whilst a whole bunch of debris and suffocating dust was blasting out of the other two towers, in a matter of nearly an hour? Maybe a little more. I have seen how much time and preperation it takes to blow a chimbley. I imagine it takes even longer to destroy a skscraper.
OinkLove100 1 year ago
@OinkLove100 In the famous CNN video we see the construction workers walking out of WTC Seven; one of them says "Keep your eye on that building; it'll be coming down" and another says "the building's gonna blow up" Apparently, they were sent in to do a quick demolition job, perhaps with some devices from the military. Remember, IF very hot thermate could NOT bring down WTC7, how could fires? One cannot have it both ways!
The military does have technology that civilians don't....
Skeptic121 1 year ago
@OinkLove100 are you saying this could not be planned?
giannaluva65 8 months ago
@giannaluva65 I was responding to a point that claims a quick demolition job, which I feel is ludicrous. My point is that it was planned. It had to have been planned. And it was taken down just after the other two towers had been planned.
OinkLove100 8 months ago
@OinkLove100 Oh. Well i think this was planned, personally anyways. Def. could not be a last minute call. They were probably operating out of WTC7
giannaluva65 8 months ago
terrorists did it.... u dont understand an american person would not kill his own people. people need to understand that.
GabbyClixby 1 year ago
@GabbyClixby and why wouldn't they? Americans kill eachother every day.
jjuggernaut 11 months ago
@GabbyClixby lol. Uh huh...
BiteTheBigOne2342 4 months ago
....as Joel Stein STATED just last year.....'i do not care if the American people think...WE (Jews)....Run and Control...the FED, the Banks, WallStreet, The Media, Hollywood and the Government....as long as...WE (Jews)...GET TO KEEP RUNNING THEM."
Thats a QUOTE FOLKS not an "opinion"
Ooloosoon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
911 ✡ ✈ ▌▌
jackelliston 1 year ago
The big question is when will those responsible be held accountable for their actions? Will it every come out, if this as I believe is, the inconsolable truth? WTC7, No plane hit this building.
TheTrevorGoodchild 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SALIVA DRUG TESTS: Are going to be used by the police here in michigan to determine whether someone is under the influence after being pulled ever for traffic violations. opioids, marijuana, methamphetamine, cocaine, and others.
POLICE STATE
jubocca 1 year ago
I'm starting to get really sick and tired of the truth deniers, if you accept 9/11 as told on the news and in the official report, then you may as well order your RFID chip online now
knkevinuk 1 year ago 22
Hmmm. BBC World usally has a clock on display showing the live-time which isn't actually in this video. Did the uploaders remove it to fake the video or did the BBC remove it when this was going out?
AlexisCapri 2 years ago
@AlexisCapri the "clock" only appears on breakfast and on 24 news, this must of been broadcast during a time period slot on bbc 1
HillierSmithStudios 1 year ago
ioiot, were 5 hrs ahead
wojnicki06 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You know that building collapsed 7 hours after the second twin tower? It was heavily damaged from both tower collapses. Everyone thought it was going to collapse. Drop the conspiracy theory.
RDiddy86 2 years ago
@RDiddy86 lol what caused it to sink into the ground ?
2dubstep5 1 year ago
plus that disconnecting effect was so fake!!!
DARILyankee 2 years ago
how can people still believe it wasnt an inside job?
DARILyankee 2 years ago 2
@DARILyankee cause it isn't. You really think the federal government is adept enough to plan such a thing...that is a funny joke in itself
terrec 2 years ago 3
actually yeah, and m not saying it was the federal government, but that is because m into conspiracy theories. cuz if people were like "yeah it was all bush and dick" then hell no, they are not capable, but i think it was bigger than that
DARILyankee 2 years ago
@terrec they planned such a thing in 1962 to goto war with Cuba so why not do it nearly 40 years later with Iraq ???????????????????????
nutsbof 1 year ago
Just goes to show what a brilliant entity BBC news is. It knows more than everyone. GAWD BLESS IT
gossieuk 2 years ago
RUN FUR YuR LIVES TEH JOOZ ARE COOMING!!!1269_
gossieuk 2 years ago
This is real incriminating evidence that youtube keeps removing. BBC news is NOT TO BE TRUSTED!!!
Look at what your eyes and ears tell you.
This is not a conspiracy "theory" it's a real conspiracy and the BBC IS IN ON IT!!!
The WHO is planning to exterminate the population using forced deadly weaponised H1N1 contaminated swine flu vaccines and they ARE going ahead with it. WHERE IS THE NEWS COVERAGE ON THAT STOREY THEN????
TOTAL MEDIA BLACK OUT.
TIMES UP PEOPLE. ALARM CLOCK. WAKE UP!!!!
Galv140577 2 years ago 2
911 was NOT done by jews, nor was it done by mainstreme Zionists. The people who made it happen are a very small group of financial elites, SOME of whom happen to be jewish zionists. Don't be racist against all jews because a dozen of them are horribly evil. If five Hindu guys shoot up a school killing 50 people, do we start going around saying all Hindu people are the devil? I think not. People are just anti-semetic. Not much has changed since the Holocaust, it seems, not enough lessonsLearned.
LeCommensale 2 years ago
how do you know? where do you get the information ? do you work for US government? are you 100% certain? Are you absolutely sure what you have just said? where is the evidence?
handsomelok 2 years ago
1 trillion% inside job. pretext for war.
SouthAyrshireCouncil 2 years ago 24
klayman you retard its wtc7
SouthAyrshireCouncil 2 years ago
well you know british people and jumping the gun............ fucking chatty cathys
pmills89 2 years ago
everyone knows jews did WTC
juancarlos3000 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ATTENTION YOUTUBE PEOPLE!!!!!!
★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
A gnarly prank will be pulled on the retarded comedian that is "FRED". What is trying to be done is humilliate him. So here are your simple steps:
1. Subscribe to fred
2.Wait for June 1st
3. UNSUBSCRIBE!
Watch what'll happen!. Hopefully it'l make the news. So try it, you aint got nothing to lose!.
Your mission objective: COPY & PASTE TO 10 DIFFERENT VIDEOS
melmelmelmelmel12695 2 years ago
that isnt the WTC behind her faggot the center was huge and tall
klayman2 2 years ago
The world trade center is not only the two towers idiot read the description!
Strome88 2 years ago 2
heres your sign
heatseeker213 2 years ago
Yeah, everyone should watch the dvd, The truth about 911. It is really good, it goes into great detail, probably the best 911 documentary you'll ever see.
BLE619 2 years ago
i prefer the theory that elvis and the loch ness monster were involved
ILIKEWALLS 2 years ago 2
Don't forget the part where Bush ran in there and tore down the support beams with his bare hands!
neilhatesyou 2 years ago 5
Dont get me wrong, there is something very fishy about the war and how bush gave all the best contracts to his vice presidents old company, but the idea that "the man" fucked up on such a large scale as to inform the bbc too early about a building collapse which was part of their master plan. come on...
ILIKEWALLS 2 years ago 2
i think bushy was behind this .
heatseeker213 2 years ago
this is fucked up.
CNN know that the building was going to detonated.
INSIDE JOB BY THE GOVERNMENT.
mosharr93 2 years ago
they were told to report it collapsed at a certain time by the FBI, however it collasped 23 minutes late due to the explosives
BrickUnit 2 years ago
gidsum29 none of what you say explains this early broadcast.when pieces of evidence like this come along people like you sideskirt the issue and start talking about other aspects of the above issue eventually totally deviating away from the original issue.most people who go back and read your comments will prob think you are a fool
666jesuit 3 years ago
The Windsor building in Spain collapsed from fire alone DUMBASS!
gidsum29 3 years ago
the windsor building did NOT collapse..DUMBASS!also comparing the windsor to building 7 or the twin towers is like comparing oranges and apples.building 7 and the towers were both 100% steel frames.the windsor was framed primarily in steel-reinforced concrete,there is a HUGE difference.anyways like i said the windsor did not collapse and i dont know why you feel the need to lie AGAIN by saying it did.again your argument is redundent...DUMBASS
666jesuit 3 years ago 4
You people are grasping at straws now. The collapse of WTC7 was NO SURPRISE; not only because of the extensive damage to the south side from the north towers collapse, but it burned for 8 hours without a drop of water. The building was leaning in the hours before the collapse. The fact that it WAS leaning disproves a controlled demolition.
gidsum29 3 years ago
the building was leaning?if you watch footage of the building collapsing youll see that it comes straight down like a controlled demolition.According to the government, fires, primarily, leveled this building, but fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper
666jesuit 3 years ago
OMFG! fires HAVE before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper!
fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper
gidsum29 3 years ago
LIAR.fires have NEVER destroyed a steel skyscraper before.go do your research as i suggest everybody reading this does.dont take anything for granted unless you can back it up with your own research.go google any of these steel skyscraper fires:The One Meridian Plaza Fire,The First Interstate Bank Fire,Caracas Tower Fire,1 New York Plaza Fire.
666jesuit 3 years ago
"About 60% of the 60 columns of the impacted face of framed-tube were severed, and many more were significantly deflected. This caused stress redistribution, which significantly increased the load of some columns, near the load capacity for some of them."
This meant the towers were near collapse from the impact alone. At this point, the fire weakened the remaining supports. (Steel has no strength when even modestly heated & the fire-proofing had been blown off by the impact)
gidsum29 3 years ago
At 9:49 a.m., the ten-ton, B-25 bomber smashed into the north side of the Empire State Building. The majority of the plane hit the 79th floor, creating a hole in the building eighteen feet wide and twenty feet high. The plane's high-octane fuel exploded, hurtling flames down the side of the building and inside through hallways and stairwells all the way down to the 75th floor.this happened july 28th 1945.A 10 TON B-25 BOMBER hit and the last time i checked the esb was still there
666jesuit 3 years ago
Im a fool???? I cant believe your comparing a B-25 that was going LESS than 100mph and is 290tons lighter than a 767-200......Do you know what velocity is? These two events DONT COMPARE and you know it. Easy on the drama idiot........Heres a little experiment.....pump a bb gun once and shoot yourself in the leg, NOW pump it 15 times...GET IT DUMBASS! You cant be that stupid.
gidsum29 3 years ago
A building has NEVER been hit by a 300TON passenger plane going 590MPH before DUMBASS! Youtube videos dont make you smart.
gidsum29 3 years ago
ok,first off you say building 7 fell because of fire,then when i said that no steel skyscraper has ever collapsed because of fire you call me a liar and say the opposite.then you tell me to go and watch a video on youtube(even allthough you are implying above that you tube videos do not make you smart!)i then reply with names and places and you shift the discussion from building 7 to the twin towers.who are you trying to convince?me or yourself?
666jesuit 3 years ago 2
OMFG! The buildings collapse from the IMPACT ZONE DOWN.....they dont start at the bottom!
gidsum29 3 years ago
seriously when they say iq,s are dropping in america they aint joking are they
666jesuit 3 years ago
Exacty! The top ten floors of the windsor building COLLASED because it was the only part of the building that WASNT concrete reinforced...the only thing that didnt collapse was the concrete inner core. THATS THE POINT DUMBASS! concrete is a good insulater of fire and bare steel is a excellent CONDUCTOR! You said YOURSELF that the WTC had 100% steel frames right? THINK!
gidsum29 3 years ago
Here it is. Please dont continue to IGNORE facts!
watch?v=_MRSr1MnFuk
gidsum29 3 years ago
and what the hell was watch?v=_MRSr1MnFuk supposed to prove?
666jesuit 3 years ago
Actually steel framed buildings have collapsed from fire alone. That's why every steel-frame building on the face of the earth has fire-proofing around the steel, to protect it.
ALSO:
Whether or not any steel-frame building ever collapsed from fire alone is irrelevant to the Twin Tower collapse.
The towers mainly collapsed due to the large number of supports being knocked out by the jets. The remaining supports had to bear the weight, almost to their load limit.
gidsum29 3 years ago
no steel frame buildings have collapsed before.LIAR.why dont you name these so called buildings becuase i have found none in my research.also to say whether fire has caused the collapse of a steel builing is irrelevent to the twin towers is poppycock and you know it..also the official explenation for the towers coming down was FIRE coupled with the damage done by the aircraft.anyways last time i checked we were talking about building 7?
666jesuit 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The internal supports thus bent and sagged downward. This pulled in the perimeter columns. In fact, photographs of the Towers show the exterior columns bending inward, & this is clear evidence that the steel inside was failing. The exterior columns then snapped inward & collapse ensued.
gidsum29 3 years ago
The internal supports thus bent and sagged downward. This pulled in the perimeter columns. In fact, photographs of the Towers show the exterior columns bending inward, & this is clear evidence that the steel inside was failing. The exterior columns then snapped inward & collapse ensued.
gidsum29 3 years ago
the twin towers were designed to withstand impact from a plane.go check out what the designers have to say about the twin towers.also when fire crews first arrived at the scene of tower 1 they reconed that 2 lines (hoses)would be sufficient to put out the fire.also anybody with half a brain whos watched footage of the towers collapsing can see for themselves that the buildings collapse from the bottom
666jesuit 3 years ago 2
what idiot spent ages making this crap video ?
freddiebobs 3 years ago
All of this talk about policing is crazy. Like... think about it.think about all the corrupt corporations and oil companies. think about the criminals.Think about that big crime in the 1900's that led to the Federal reserve.I mean from a guy stealing bread on the street to the senators accepting bribes for their own interests.. to the 10% of people who own this country... Crime is always going to be around. You cant police the ppl who really need to be policed. It will always exist. face it.
andy69fox 3 years ago
You know what, I don't believe everything that has been told to us by our goverment, but this is clearly a newscaster speaking in front of old footage. Tell me that the plane over penn. was shot down, I say YES it was but to think that our government has esp, I say give me a break. Common people spend your energy looking at the real facts that are killing us and less time with this garbage.
mikeyloco1 3 years ago
You know... I hate it that we can persuade everyone to think the way we do. 2 out of 4 people wont believe that the MSM would actually LIE to us on TV... U can say what u want to them. they are already brainwashed red white and blue americans... Can't change an idiot. I just wish America would wakeup and figure out that if we don't act now our children will suffer for something the generation before wouldnt take care of. I respect you people who really KNOW the TRUTH. Thanks alot guys.. We know.
andy69fox 3 years ago
Oh yeah, and what a lying bitch. Someone on the Internet should get a interview with her and forcefully ask her WTF was going on. Sure the government will kill her but fack it... it would be worth it.
andy69fox 3 years ago
i am as you would expect given my user name, very aware of henleys lyrics in the song. i too feel that sending troops to fight a war poorly equipped and poorly informed,while there are fat cats back in the usa burning money for fun is bad. that doesnt mean it isnt a war that needs fighting. i am of the opinion that a centralised world controlling force that doesnt involve islamic extremists is a good idea. whether they accually blew up the towers or not i dont know i doubt it as you do...
longroadoutofeden2 3 years ago
watch?v=bN7o8bW3e3I
Don't believe the hype you see on TV. Now I see where our difference of opinion is coming from. I too believe you to be a good person but also believe your mind has been led up the garden path (as mine was). To see the news, throw your television out the window and start again.
flavour54 3 years ago
As a footnote, I do not have a lot of doubt as to whether they did it themselves. In fact I would go as far as saying they are as guilty as sin itself. This is one of the main reasons I do not trust the chip considering the issuers would be this pack of p..... We need a balnce of power and right now because of complacency we have let it slip way too far. The chip is where I must draw a line in the sand that I am prepared to defend with my life.
Peace.
flavour54 3 years ago
oh have no worries i am under no illusions of the censored tripe that comes from murdocks boxes.the attrocities of 911 can never be excused but. the final result is what is important.you think we can leave these highly fanatical religious groups in the east to themselves,of course not.until the centralised world government comes to be.these crazies were prepared to kill a english teacher who called a teddy bear mohammed,but the crazy fkrs think it ok to name 90% of themselves by that name.
longroadoutofeden2 3 years ago
Really with the amount of corruption going on, maybe the chip should be placed on high ranking officials first and thier movements tracked by us and displayed in the main square of every major city we live. Lets start there and also tap thier phones and start recording the conversation they have in every room they walk in. Another point. If you have nothing to hide then why don't we put a camera in our living rooms to keep us safe from people building weapons and holding grandma hostage?
flavour54 3 years ago
you mis interpret my meaning, when i say you and me that is simplifying it i mean people and authority, ok you are honest no problem however as i said you arent known personally by authority,so we have to assume that anyone is capable of anything,as we see everyday, how often do you hear someone say, "such a nice person we lived next door to him for 20 years we never thought he would do something like that"yes it is extreme but the world is full of extremists so we have to combat it.
longroadoutofeden2 3 years ago
very clever, but lets have it this way we have a segment of footage lost at the bbc, knowing this a certain person who recorded it has edited the building into his footage and posted it on the net the bbc cannot disprove it because as we know the footag was lost. is there any other footage of any other station anywhere in the world that got this timed wrong, show me.
longroadoutofeden2 3 years ago
CNN. It was press released early. I would like to know who that person was.
flavour54 3 years ago
her eyes look strangely reptilian ..
ZORGtheALIEN 3 years ago
maybe reptiles are to blame for the twin towers falling.
aedwardgorman 3 years ago
ah...
I knew about the "strange vertical fall" of the building, but that BBC reporters were even gifted with precognition I was not aware of...
... maybe the plane was late on the march table è_é trust to flying companies!!!
PS: the speaker in studio, it seems he was not aware of what was happening, since he made openly notice that the palace was still there...
CeeLord76 3 years ago
Thanks to "Loose Change" video documentary, The American economy right now, Alex Jones, and David Icke among other brave activists (National Heros). People are slowly but seriously beginning to wake up to the truth. Okay people, now seriously watch : "The Bohemina Gove" -U-tube video investigation by Alex Jones, get a clue to what our leadership has been up to for the last few centuries (this is no conspiracy, this is the truth!)
jamesbrownintown 3 years ago
thats not a window behind her its a tv screen, and she didn't guesse it before it happened the was a time lag in the video behind her. thats why it hadn't fallin in the background yet.
asspants101 3 years ago
9/11 was an inside job, people are starting to wake up to that!
jamesbrownintown 3 years ago 3
they need to start waking up faster :]
DjHopies07 3 years ago 2
excuse for iraq and now, iran will have one too. we can only wait and see.
cheesepumpkins 3 years ago
Dissent is the highest form of patriotism. I just noticed your Australian. If you think for a second, that we're under the radar of the greater picture, think again. Enjoy your microchip. The day they sell the microchip to you and you take it to keep you safe, think of me and what I was trying to tell you. I'd sooner die than accept that thing.
flavour54 3 years ago
would you not like to think that if your young son or daughter was abducted there would be some way of finding them. or trace murderers rapists and other such scum. there is far more to microchips than the big brother paranoia.
longroadoutofeden2 3 years ago
And there you have the classic sell people. The manipulation of fear and hate to make us want the chip. Wow, it is actually working. Just when you thought "has if we would accept that."
Well, there you have it people.
flavour54 3 years ago
isnt that what governments are supposed to do protect us from our fears,you think if you change the controlling forces the scumbags of this earth will magically dissapear, your solution as to ridding us of them ,if your preferred choice takes charge is something i would be glad to hear.
longroadoutofeden2 3 years ago
The job of my government to protect my safety is supposed to be through police numbers, not cameras and chips. More taxes are being paid than ever before yet the money gets squandered on rubbish. Even according to the official story a microchip could not have prevented 911. They all had valid passports. I as a human being have the RIGHT to walk down the street anonymously. The abuse of governmental power has been shown time & time again through history, the chip gives them a lot more leverage.
flavour54 3 years ago
The other problem is that governments are first creating our fears (911) in order to pursue thier objective of planting chips in us. Which shows me the same people telling me that the chip would be good are the MURDERER SCUMBAGS it is supposed to protect me from. Thanks but no thanks.
If I as a civilian want to lie about where I am today to say, my employer, then I should be able to.
flavour54 3 years ago
Eventually we will all have access to each others chip locations, so they won't even have to police us. We will police each other. The few elitists will simply collect money and have a self governing system where we oppress each other under the disguise of some sort of work ethic.
If we misbehave and point out that it has taken a lot of unity away from humanity and become dangerous, they could hunt us down quickly or simply turn off the chip. There are a million reasons why the chip is bad.
flavour54 3 years ago
very logical but you talk about fears, every word is based on your fears, some secret society doing this, governments plotting to deceive us that, police states etc etc etc, you are using "peoples fears" in your own arguement.we dont live in an ideal world. great to think we walk down the street annonymously,however there are millions of nasty people in this world who would not think twice of ignoring your human rights for financial gain/sick pleasure.that is why we need it.
longroadoutofeden2 3 years ago
more police numbers?, so we put one on every street corner in every nook and cranny where your scumbags are at work.millions of police and a 400% increase in taxes to pay for them all and what use? police used to command some kind of respect not anymore they just shoot them.using the arguement,if i to lie to my boss as a reason for your annonymity, what else? i have the right to theive and rob and deal drugs,stab a kid or mug a granny without someone looking over my shoulder.
longroadoutofeden2 3 years ago
whoever runs the world is irrelevant, it will still need policing, manpower doesnt work it isnt working now and never has, and crime gets worse and worse,you arent known personally by your government so they have to assume anyone is capable of anything at anytime, if you have nothing to hide whats your problem, looking at it from the standpoint of i cant be dishonest if i'm chipped is not quite an arguement is it.
longroadoutofeden2 3 years ago
Police are dealing with less officers per capita than ever before. So how would you know if numbers aren't working? I don't have to be honest with you as to where I am as it's none of your business.I am not a criminal and will not be tracked like one. Hey, you wanna catch a murderer of thousands of people. Start with the whitehouse, he didn't have to be microchipped for me to ascertain that now did he?
flavour54 3 years ago
I'm not sure what the taxes are being wasted on in your country, unless its the U.S., in which case it would be wars based on lies. Oh here we go, chucking a sickie at work can lead to mass murder. Regular comedian. Nobody has the right to track me and it's a freedom I will NEVER give up. It is none of your or anyone elses business where I am, how much money I have, medical history, school grades. It may become your business when I am convicted. It can be looked up with current technology.
flavour54 3 years ago
Have you seen the vid at the top of this screen? Is that based on fears or fact. The same people who want us to be chipped are the scumbags. We do not need a chip. It is immoral to force that ideal on anyone. Let me guess, you have already got one? I don't want my records to be accessed by people without my permission. I am not a criminal, nor do I have a criminal record. What your asking me to do is trust the issuer. I refer you to the vid at the top of the screen again?
flavour54 3 years ago
Thats really ironic that you would even debate this stuff considering your profile name is longroadoutofeden. Perhaps you should listen carefully to the lyrics of a song with the same title by the eagles and the message it's trying to give on how the elitist bankers (who are the same big push behind the chip) are dividing this country a little finer amongst themselves at our expense.
flavour54 3 years ago
I think you should do a little more research. If you feel a slight slapping sensation from behind, I think you'll find it's both our governments.
flavour54 3 years ago
Yeah, and the BBC happened to lose the footage. It not like it was an important day to keep the footage.
flavour54 3 years ago
This video fails to show the actual time. There were still reports that the building may collapse because of the interior fire and damage. This is why it was let to burn. It's easy to mess up this information.
And I can't believe that people actually believe this "press release" garbage. The press wasn't in on this. There is no way the government could have carried out this large of an attack. There is too much evidence that supports what happened. 19 terrorists killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11.
ChitownToewsKaner 3 years ago
where...please direct me to this info
dloverise 3 years ago
firehouseDOTcom/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/hayden.html
Unlike the Twin Towers, the collapse of WTC 7 had been anticipated for several hours and the building had been evacuated.
ChitownToewsKaner 3 years ago
hi thanks for your recommendation - I read the fire fighter's testimony re building 7 and whilst I don't believe the media was in on it, its very hard to belive that building 7 would fall into its own footprint (even with the bulge between 10-12). cheers
dloverise 3 years ago
Yeah, lets trust official sources, our government is here to serve and protect us:) If it was evacuated for several hours, how did they ascertain from several hundred metres that it had collapsed 23 mins in the future????????????????
flavour54 3 years ago
I think you'll find it was completely evacuated earlier that day. How could they ascertain from several hundred metres away that it was soon to collapse.
flavour54 3 years ago
for timestamp watch: watch?v=cj8w2oCDbRY
flavour54 3 years ago
She's probably a reptilian who exists only on David Icke's mind, and somehow it's projected on YouTube as a common video. I can't see any other possible explanation for that...
strattford 3 years ago
Man, they're announcing it before it happens.
flavour54 3 years ago
You people are so stupid.
Just because a collapse "looks" similar to demolition collapses does not in any way shape or form prove that it was a demolition.
Anubis78250 3 years ago
Man, they're announcing it before the event.
flavour54 3 years ago
wow, some dodgy going ons indeed.
Typhoon07 3 years ago
Salomon Brothers Building is not world trade
center, he is even saying it in your clip!
"The Salomon Brothers Building collapsing, and indeed it has. Apperently that's only
-A FEW HUNDRED YARDS AWAY FROM WHERE THE WORLD TRADE CENTER-
towers where."
Kiwipai 3 years ago
solomon brothers building=wtc7 try google
judahmommy 3 years ago
It was also known as World Trade Center building 7. It was part of the complex. They announced it 23 minutes early.
flavour54 3 years ago
"t was also known as World Trade Center building 7. It was part of the complex. They announced it 23 minutes early."
No time stamp on this video = this video is total garbage.
herbzilla11 3 years ago
watch?v=cj8w2oCDbRY
Not only that, the BBC admits it on thier website. They say on there that it was because of a cock up, not because of a conspiracy.
flavour54 3 years ago
"Not only that, the BBC admits it on thier website. They say on there that it was because of a cock up, not because of a conspiracy"
WRONG
They say that they had no advanced knowledge that the towers were going to fall & that nobody was feeding them information or telling them what to say
They acknowledge that people claim this is not true but the refute that claim
The 'cock up' they refer to is that they lost the original copy of the tape
But we have it here on youtube so it doesn't matter
herbzilla11 3 years ago
It's standing behind her head.
flavour54 3 years ago
Poor Jayne, first time ever the BBC were exclusive on a story! Pity it was 20 minutes early! Oh well, they do say everyone gets their 20 minutes of fame, bet she didn't expect it to be like this!!! ~Q~
KnowsTheQ 3 years ago
And,to Jayne Standley,maybe she should have "confirmed" that WTC 7 was actually down just as she was so eager to make sure that the reports of injured police officers were "confirmed" before she stated it as fact!
nikamota 3 years ago
Wtc 7 was a controlled demolition,the BBC were issued with a press release and they just read it out on LIVE tv,unfortunately for the BBC,they didnt check if the pre planned controlled demolition had actually taken place yet!And the result was this live broadcast from New York with WTC 7 still standing! Controlled demolition of WTC 7,unfortunately,points to 9/11 not being a surprise attack after all.
nikamota 3 years ago
Every news service in the entire world works for the bush administration?
Even so why would he risk giving them the press releases early?
What possible purpose cold it serve other than to allow you to stumble on his sinister plan?
Do you think he left a train of 911 bread crumbs for you to follow?
Did it ever occur to you that the reason why the author of this video chose a segment that contained absolutly no reference to what time it is so that he could just make up the times he listed?
herbzilla11 3 years ago
There is another one with a time stamp. Search "Salamon time stamp"
flavour54 3 years ago
Because a spokesman for the BBC trying to defend itself (poorly as it turned out) confirmed that,yes,this was genuine live footage from the day.They also confirmed that the BBC had lost all of its archived live footage of 9/11 shortly after this segment was unearthed! The BBC!!!. Be suspicious.Ask questions,Do some research.Something stinks to high heaven!!!
nikamota 3 years ago
haha, What do you mean there is no proof look up truth 911, there are firefighter that heard and saw explosions. I think your afraid just like most people to hear the truth. "herbzilla11" you find a way to dismiss the possibility that this so called free county is F#$ken lying to you. Be a man/women and open your eyes, or are you one of those who until the world is going to end, or when the truth comes out you act still can't believe. puss..
atmancloud 3 years ago
There is no proof that the station was not using an old recording and just throwing up a blue screen behind her to make it look like they had a reporter on the scene.
I did not see anything on the video to indicate the time.
And I an not ever totally sure that you are pointing at the right building with your arrow.
Some people are so desperate to believe in conspiracies that they abandon every last shred of critical thinking and blindly believe 100% of what they hear no questions asked.
herbzilla11 3 years ago
/sarcasm?
GraftsAndCrafts 3 years ago
There is NO time indicated on the footage,
So I have ZERO faith in the times given,
I would need to see a detailed area map to be sure the building being pointed at was actually WTC 7
And even if the tower is up in the back ground, news channels use none-live feeds all the time, there is no gaurantee that the images behind the women speaking are live/ in real time.
CTers are an inherently dishonest bunch and I'll believe the the statments about this video when I see the proof.
herbzilla11 3 years ago
I know, this video isn't good proof as there is no time scale and some ambiguities. However, I was /sarcasming your statement:
"they abandon every last shred of critical thinking and blindly believe 100% of what they hear no questions asked"
I have no idea how you can possess critical thinking and NOT question the happenings of 9/11. I was 12 when it happened and even then could clearly tell it was a demolition. And I am not "inherently dishonest", thank you.
GraftsAndCrafts 3 years ago
Well I was in college getting my physics degree when I saw 911 and I could tell that it was a structural collapse brought on by massive failures in the buildings supports caused by a jumbo jet crashing into them, damaging the on the steel supports beams and then dumping tens of thousands of gallons of jet fuel into the tower and cooking its insides for a hour and forty minutes.
herbzilla11 3 years ago
LOL. That wasn't even the WTC 7 tower.
DarkChris91 3 years ago
Absoloutely!
the truth is going to be common knowledge soon.
noisecape 3 years ago
wow this is fucking unbelievable, there is sooooo much evidence to suggest the official story was false. Im glad the elite underestimate us, the public, they think they can just feed us bullshit stories and we'll keep buying it, the country is waking up and they dont even know it
uwmbigb 3 years ago
how do we know it's WTC7 in the video? how can we be sure. and how do we know what time it is in the clip?
DanFrederiksen 3 years ago
the BBC sucks, they took out multi billion pound loans from 'european banks', so I've been reading in the papers. And they deny it. LOL. We're destined for a MASS wake up sometime soon. Could 2012 be a mass awakening for us all?
noisecape 3 years ago 2
yessir i really think it will be 2012. By the time the american union comes into play, the dollar is disbanded for the Amero, and the real id act and RFID chipping is in play, people will see this is far from folklore.
uwmbigb 3 years ago
I don't think 2012 will be a specific event, but more just a realisation, maybe the truth will come out in public, finally.
The evidence is staggering against the official story, and yet there is 0 evidence SUPPORTING the official story...it's truly pathetic. I cant believe anyone still believes arabs in caves crashed planes into buildings.
noisecape 3 years ago
ya dude seriously. talk about denial. these r the same people who want to still debate shit like whther or not smoking is bad for you. their is no debate to be had
uwmbigb 3 years ago
it was the jews i tell ya
ibbu4eva 4 years ago
bbc is owned ... billions of dollars are payed to the chiefs of the media to tell what THEY want YOU to know ! ASSHOLES,how can you still believe your stupid fuckin government,after all this years , you simply DENY the TRUTH , in this case,i really HOPE somebody will come and kill all you , 2 stupid 2 deserve 2 live ! many people are dying because you don`t do something with that stupid cowboy that runs your world,assholes....
EvLSant0s 4 years ago
Mossad job!
glup2glup 4 years ago 2
HOLY SHIT !
teched246 4 years ago
is it me or are they refering to a seperate building?1 of the many buildings around the wtc complex??
klagnut 4 years ago
Its the Salamon Brothers building. It collapsed supposedly from the debris from wtc 1 & 2 8 hours later. FBI & CIA had offices in it. Jane Standley is reporting it as collapsed BEFORE it had actually collapsed. If you think its a blue screen then check out the reflective wall to the left of the screen. Keep in mind 1:This is the building where Larry Silverstein said "Pull it" 2. The length of time it takes to put explosives to make a building implode. 3. The BBC has lost the footage.
flavour54 4 years ago
Fuck 9/11. It´s not the most important thing in the world.
Neidhardt84 4 years ago
But it is a huge eye opener to how the World operates now. If 911 is an inside job then what is the war on terror? Its a wake up call.
flavour54 4 years ago 2
WHAT DO THE BBC SAY ABOUT THIS VIDEO?
coach3sheff 4 years ago
The BBC sais on their own website "We lost the footage not because of a conspiracy, just a cock up""If anyone has the footage we'd like to see it" Look up Jane Standley after wtc7. This is the first video that woke me up a few months ago. I cannot look at the world the same way I used to. I can't look at the news the same. I now have a youtube channel with 47 videos. My masterpiece is "David Icke tears apart 9-11" part 1 to part 14.
flavour54 4 years ago 2
what is the matter with you people WAKE UP!!! do some research on 9/11... people laugh at David Icke he predicted this years before 2001 but everyone is BLIND and unwilling to do anything just wait till you regret your ignorant decisions this presidential election is so important it's freightening I live in Canada and im fearing for my kids... before you vote make sure you get your facts straight RESEARCH educate your self GOOD LUCK ... read up Ron Paul REVOLUTION IS NOW
shoveitharder 4 years ago
If jane dun the lotto she would not have two work and get her self in all this shit.
dermot2222 4 years ago
The newslady is fit
FinanceBoy1 4 years ago
damn. what a stupid mistake.
coderre 4 years ago
......yeh, we can expect to see it on barry normans "itll be alright on the night!!
FrozenExplosion 4 years ago
No steel skyscraper has been tested with tons of jet fuel either. So before you open your big mouth, why dont you consider the physics behind it. Easy to believe in something when you dont understand it. So think a little more, what structural damage is done in a fire... none... how bout a plane crash, lots... also consider the building, if your not an engineer you should not judge how something happens, because most likely your not smart enough to figure it out
TostaJ 4 years ago
Plenty of physicists *have* tested the physics. Plane hitting buildings? Try a B52 hitting the Empire State building in 1945. No building collapse. Also, you do not have to be an engineer to know that buildings do not fall at free fall speed into the path of *most* resistance.
Strav777 4 years ago
Once again, you not being an engineer, you have skipped over some major factor, and concluded that its impossible for a building to fall in the so called "path of most resistance." While you are correct that a B52 hit the Empire states building, you are incorrect to conclude that such an example compares to that of the World Trade Center. First of all
TostaJ 4 years ago
Once again you have misconstrued the scenario and I am guessing you're not a structural engineer; correct me if I am wrong. Sure a B52 hit the Empire State building in 1945. Now let's consider the differences. First of all the B52 which struck the building was traveling a much slower rate of speed. Second the amount of fuel on board was significantly less. Third the fuel which the B52 used in 1945 burned at a much lower maximum temperature rate then that of current Jet A-1 fuel.
TostaJ 4 years ago
Now let's compare the buildings. The Empire State's building is constructed in a way I which the weight of the building is evenly supported throughout the construction sight. The World Trade Center however was built in way in which the weight of the entire structure was supported through the perimeter, to create an open floor plan.
TostaJ 4 years ago