Herman Cain didn't know that China ALREADY HAS NUKES, said he was going to prevent them from getting nukes. I kid you not. More embarrassing than the sexual accusations against him.
PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES IN MOST STATES.
IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.
IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.
IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !
WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste this everywhere! Thumbs up!
Herman Cain is ignorant of the corruption that exists in the Federal Reserve. Just like Obama, he talks a good talk and walks a good walk; and just like Obama, people are falling in love with his personality. To make matters worse, he flat out LIED in the debate Tuesday night. WE DO NOT NEED THIS FED INSIDER IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!!
Herman Cain is a fed agent!!!! nothing he says makes sense !!! 9-9-9 is a joke and Herman Cain is going to increase the debt because he will continue to give aid to Israel and other countries. 9-9-9 will become 30-30-30 !!!
@ripham247 search on youtube: why ron paul must be president. i dare you to search about ron paul and youtube and see how absolutely great he is. you will see how every video he has has about 100% likes...you will see how he makes so much sense and how he has the most military soldier donations. Ron Paul is a genius and the media ignores him because he is a threat to big banks and corporations.
@SuperMeatsause I respect Paul's economic policies very much. but the fact of the matter is that his foreign policy is to dangerous for the most powerful nation in the world. Herman Cain is the perfect man for the job right now. Some may say he doesn't have foreign policy experience, but that is not something you attain before the presidency. Please vote for Cain.
@ripham247 I will never vote for Cain. Ron Paul's foreign policy is so ingenious !!!!! He's going to cut all aid to foreign countries and Israel which will cut spending, Ron Paul is perhaps one the of the greatest politicians to ever live and it hurts me so much that he isn't in first place. It's funny...most voters want to increase taxes for corporations and Cain and Romney are lowering corporate taxes and people vote for him. Just pathetic. Vote Ron Paul if you want a REAL leader.
@SuperMeatsause Yay! Abandoning our allies, sounds like tons of fun! Ron Paul is a delusional old man. And no, a lot of people don't want to raise taxes on corporations, just the opposite. Herman Cain is the best possible choice. Paul couldn't lead a fish to water. And what do you mean the media ignores him? He's been on FOX News 47 times since he announced his candidacy, and over 70 since the start of the year. Hell, he's on FOX right now! His videos are so well liked because of Paulbots like u
@RoosterCogburn1008 you probably don't even know why Israel is our ally...George Washington even advised not to make international alliances. So Herman Cain was an executive crook, he worked for the fed, he has no political experience, he supported the bank bailouts, he wants to raise taxes on the poor and middle class and make the rich get richer. Ron Paul has the lowest spending budget. He wants to completely stop foreign aid and military spending and wants to end the IRS and the fed.
@SuperMeatsause Cain is not a crook (name something he's done illegally), being a FED chairman for one year doesn't make him Satan, he has no political experience (which is good), most people supported the bailouts (just not how they were executed), and he wants everyone to pay low taxes (BIG conservative stance). I assumed Libertarian liked low taxes. Exactly, Ron Paul wants to cut the military (not the best thing to do in the middle of a war). 999 would make the IRS obsolete, duh.
@RoosterCogburn1008 how is having no political experience good? are you saying that colleges shouldn't offer political science as a major? Herman Cain is so stupid. He knows nothing about foreign policy, he admits that. Right now people are paying low taxes and under 999 they will pay way more. and guess what...the rich will pay less. Ron Paul was the only one who didn't support the theory of the bank bailouts. Cutting the military is genius, less deaths, less terrorism, and less debt.
@SuperMeatsause The last thing we need right now is a career politician who will just screw things up more. We need an experienced business, and Herman Cain is just that. Barely any President has foreign policy experience before taking office. And he says he would listen to what the actual generals have to say, which is a pretty damn good idea. And are you actually defending our current tax system? Where the lower 50% don't pay anything and the upper 50 pay it all? Everyone pays little under the
@SuperMeatsause 999 plan. Look up the actual details of it. And cutting the military is the last thing you want to do when WE'RE AT WAR!!!!! That means more deaths, a lot more terrorism, but yes, less debt. But if you want less debt at the cost of thousands of American civilian death, well, too bad.
@RoosterCogburn1008 we're not at war. these wars are never ending. you don't even know what the war is about. We gave the taliban 3 billion dollars and we supported them when the soviets invaded afghanistan. what gives us any right to invade their country and establish OUR version of democracy. America has set up all the dictators in the world and we trained Al-Qaeda. Oh and 1.5 million Iraq's died in the war. Does that seem fair? It's all about world domination and oil my friend.
@SuperMeatsause Are you delusional? Of course were at war, have you been in a coma for the last decade? And yes, I know what the war is about, I only wonder if you do. We supported them against the soviets, who were a much bigger threat. Now that the Soviets are gone, we deal with the others. We have the right because they attacked us, lost, and now we're trying to prevent it from happening again! The U.S. didn't set up all the dictators. And if it was about oil, wouldn't we have some!?!?!?!?!?!
@SuperMeatsause Libertarians always overlook that. If it was about us getting oil, we would actually have oil!!! Or we would have invaded a place that a significant amount of oil, like Saudi Arabia. None of what the Libertarians say make sense. Its just anti-American propaganda. I care about the military deaths of OUR country, not the other. Why? Because I only care about this one! Libertarians are the same as socialists in that aspect, they all scream for world solidarity between people.
@RoosterCogburn1008 dude, non of the middle-eastern countries are a threat to us. They have no air force and they can't invade us. The only legit war our country has fought was the revolutionary war. Britain invaded and occupied us and we fought back in self defense, self determination, and freedom. We have killed 1.5 million Iraqis. Most U.S soldiers die from SUICIDE. If they were REALLY FIGHTING FOR A CAUSE, why would they commit suicide? At the same time, we create more terrorism.
@SuperMeatsause Are you a time traveler from 1800? Its called fucking terrorism! You think people are worried about an Iranian army marching onto U.S. soil? No, we're worried about terrorist attacks on our soil supported by their government. Most of the Middle Eastern countries (Iran, Syria, Pakistan, possibly Egypt) are a threat to us! And you pulled that out of your ass; most U.S. soldiers do not die from suicide. And suicides happen in the military because war is hell if you haven't noticed.
@RoosterCogburn1008 dude you can't stop terrorism by killing more people. For every one person killed, 10 more develop hatred towards us. Why is that they are terrorists but our soldiers aren't? We have killed 1.5 million Iraqis, we have killed hundreds of thousands of children and innocent civilians. They are terrorists and so are we. Going overseas and killing and bombing will only create more terrorism and hatred. You can look it up, most military deaths are from suicides...
@SuperMeatsause First, if you're calling our troops terrorists, then Paulbots hate the military more than I thought...We are trying to stop terrorism, which is why we spend so much money there, helping the civilians! And do you honestly think that if we pull out, they'll say "Oh, we're sorry, let's friends"? No, they will attack us again and you will have sacrificed even more American lives because you believe everyone loves peace! And I did look it up, most deaths in the military aren't from s.
@RoosterCogburn1008 I'm not calling them terrorists...I'm just saying, why are arabs terrorists but our soldiers aren't terrorists? they both kill. We are not helping the civilians there. We killed over 1.5 million Iraqis. I bet you less than 10% of them were militants. We are bombing recklessly and killing children and innocent people. Sounds like freedom right? Oh and Ron Paul has the more donations from active duty soldiers than all of the other republican candidate COMBINED.
@SuperMeatsause "They are terrorists and so are we." Yes, you did say that! And I have a question: how many people would Saddam have killed by now? Wars are bloody, and every war for freedom has casualties. And it strikes me that your opinion would stop killing over there, and just bring it here. Or do think we deserve it? All you libertarians play the same tune.
@RoosterCogburn1008 I'm saying that if you call them terrorists, then our troops can be labeled as terrorists as well.So you're saying that it takes the expense of millions of lives to kill one man? Look at Libya, we barely helped them and they killed Gaddafi by themselves. We shouldn't be the policemen of the world. We should have killed Hussein just like how we killed Osama. Osama was in Pakistan but we aren't at war with Pakistan... IMO it was all for oil.
@SuperMeatsause Who is calling the troops terrorists, except the terrorists? Ya, Libya was a mistake. We police the world looking out for our own self interests, which helps everyone. If we had just assassinated Hussein, I would have given it maybe 5 minutes before Iran jumped at the chance to have basic control over Iraq; not to mention at the time we thought he was WMDs, so no we couldn't do that. No, we're not a war with Pakistan. But our enemy was, so we shot him= beautiful. Its a shame Paul
@SuperMeatsause thinks it was wrong. And why is it all liberals think it was over oil? If it was, WE WOULD HAVE FUCKING OIL AND NOT HIGH GAS PRICES!!!!! How hard is that to understand? And if we did take oil, why is everyone complaining that we didn't take oil!?!?!?!?! And if we wanted to go to war over oil, we should have invaded a country with at least some valuable oil reserves, like Saudi Arabia. You people don't think things through well, do you?
@RoosterCogburn1008 We don't go to wars if it doesn't benefit anyone. The only ones who benefited from the war were corporations and oil men who financed Bush's presidency. I don't think we spent trillions to liberate the people of Iraq. We gave weapons of mass destruction to Iraq. It's all global domination. Destroy their infrastructure and take their resources and when all the oil is dried up, then we start to drill here. You have to look at the motives.
@SuperMeatsause No, you need to look at the motives, because the ones you say have no basis. We spent trillions in Iraq fighting a war, and showing the people there that we're on their side, via giving them their freedom in a better government, improving schools, and roads. No, America did not give Iraq WMDs, and I don't even want to know the bullshit blog you got that from. The U.S. doesn't need to try to dominate the globe BECAUSE WE ALREADY DO! People who benefited from the Iraq War= everyone
@SuperMeatsause We've improved there infrastructure, and they still have their oil. Where ever you're getting your information, the source seems like just LL= Libertarian Lies.
@RoosterCogburn1008 improved their infrastructure?!? what the hell? we dropped hundreds of bombs and turned their cities into war grounds and reduced it to ruble. We shouldn't rebuild other countries in the first place. Our infrastructure is in pretty bad shape but we don't have money to improve that? We don't have to be the policemen of the world. if the people don't like Saddam Hussein, they can do what the Libyans did to Gaddafi. Herman Cain knows NOTHING about foreign policy.
@SuperMeatsause Once again you ignore everything presented to you. At least Cain's foreign policy isn't openly antiAmerican like Paul's. Alright, tell me: If the United States doesn't protect itself from foreign threats, what do you think will happen? Everyone will lay down their arms, hold hands, and sing around a big oak tree in a socialist utopia? Nope. Innocent people will die, and peace will NEVER be able to exist. You need to stop thinking like a liberal and get some common sense and logic
@RoosterCogburn1008 OK first of all, Iran nor Iraq have an air force to attack us, we have thousands of nukes to threaten Iran with so that they don't use one, and if we develop friendships with them then they won't hate our guts! Herman Cain is anti-peace and pro-war. War will destroy the earth you retard. Why can we have nukes but Iran can't? We used 2 nukes on Japan! The soviet union and china have nukes and we are friends...Herman Cain is an ignorant turd who will never win anything.
@SuperMeatsause Two things you've obviously never heard of: terrorism, and peace through strength. Iran doesn't want to be our friend, they just want to see us die. Not the best way to form a friendship, huh? Peace is a two-way street you idiot. All countries like Iran understand is brute strength. We have the strength, so they don't attack in any way. And do you imagine Iranian planes bombing American cities and launching a nuclear bomb from their country? If you do you're a moron. Its called
@SuperMeatsause nuclear terrorism. They give a nuclear bomb to a terrorist organization, which they then use to attack us. That is why Iran can't have a nuke. Would you put that weapon into the hands of an unstable islamic dictatorship who suppresses freedom and exploits racism? China and the Soviets actually care if they get destroyed or not. You can't compare them to Iran at all. And you're saying Cain is unelectable? This coming from a supporter of the Republican version of Joe Biden? HA!
@RoosterCogburn1008 Again, America is the only country to ever to use a nuke but we are trusted. Japan attacked a strategic base and we dropped a couple of nukes and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people. What gives us a right to say who can and can't have nukes? No one should have nukes but it is not fair for a couple of nations to have superior authority over others. That is called global domination which is very wrong. We created the beast and we don't know how to deal with it.
@SuperMeatsause We ended the biggest war in the history of man kind by dropping those bombs. Whether a complete invasion of Japan, suicide missions by the Japanese, and an occupation of the islands would have cost more lives is debatable. Its called American exceptionalism. That's the biggest problem with you libertarians/liberals. For whatever reason, you hate the fact that the U.S. is the biggest world power. And if you would trust ANY country with a nuclear bomb, you really are insane.
@RoosterCogburn1008 American exceptionalism is very wrong. To say that America is the best country in the world because it just is is flat out wrong. Iran will never use a nuke and all of the things Israel and America are doing to threaten Iran is just wrong. The only reason we are the biggest world power is that we took advantage of other people. Being a world power is like being a dictator on a larger scale. The longer we continue that war in the middle east, the more our defense will suffer.
@SuperMeatsause America is the best country in the world because we are the leaders of the free world, and have led the charge of Republican forms of government for over 200 years. Disagreeing with that is why most Americans say Ron Paul is anti-American. Iran will never use a nuke as long as they don't get one. If they do, you can say good bye to at least one U.S. city and millions of people. There will always be a world power, thats not even political, its just an unchangeable fact of nature.
@SuperMeatsause The question is, would you rather see a country like Russia or China dominate the world? The U.S. won its spot fair and square by being the best country on the planet. And the longer we provide our enemies the chance to strike and give them the ability to hurt us, the more our defense will suffer. All leaving the middle east would do is bring the fight to American soil, where our civilians will die. And why are Paulbots so much in love with Iran?
@RoosterCogburn1008 I have no idea why you would say that. Ron Paul is a libertarian which means he bases his political views on liberty, freedom, and prosperity for all. Ron Paul supporters want freedom for all and the reason Ron Paul is so different is that his philosophy on constitutional government is revolutionary. He wants to bring government back to what it was originally intended to do as our founding fathers established it. The rest are wall street crooks ESPECIALLY Cain and Romney !
@SuperMeatsause First of all, Cain isn't a wall street businessman. Second, whats wrong with wall street businessman? Sounds like an occupier complaint to me. And I say that because it seems no matter what happens, libertarians always defend Iran; its our fault they're so radical; they're no threat; they want to be friends; they deserve a nuclear weapon; the U.S. is the cause of all problems. That is why people hate libertarians so much. You always take the sides of tyrannical dictators that
@SuperMeatsause First of all, Cain isn't a wall street businessman. Second, whats wrong with wall street businessman? Sounds like an occupier complaint to me. And I say that because it seems no matter what happens, libertarians always defend Iran; its our fault they're so radical; they're no threat; they want to be friends; they deserve a nuclear weapon; the U.S. is the cause of all problems. That is why people hate libertarians so much. You always take the sides of tyrannical dictators that
@RoosterCogburn1008 Herman Cain and Mitt Romney supported the TARP bailouts. Herman Cain is a CEO not really a businessman. I'm not taking the side of Iran or any other country. I just feel like every republican candidate especially Cain's foreign policy is just plain retarded. Peace through strength and clarity? That's solves every problem in the world. Ron Paul's foreign policy is the foreign policy of Washington and Jefferson. Enough said.
@SuperMeatsause suppress liberty, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of protest. Why do you people always take the side of dictators and Al-Qaeda over America?
@RoosterCogburn1008 We are helping Al-Qaeda when we send troops there because they can attack troops far more easily. We should build a strong defense built around non-interventionism and understand why they are our enemies. The theory that they hate us because we are free is a bunch of bullshit that the neo-conservatives and the media made up. Al-Qaeda had 3 motives for 9/11 and 9/11 wouldn't have happened if we had a non-interventionist foreign policy.
@SuperMeatsause By neo-con I assume you mean conservative since neither Democrats or libertarians are conservative. All you want to do is leave the enemy alone so they can plot to attack us. What is wrong with an enemy that declared war on us? And you just proved my point! Saying that it is America's fault 9/11 happened is taking Al-Qaeda's side!!!!!!!!
@RoosterCogburn1008 The reason 9/11 happened revolves around our interventionism in the middle east. We give Israel billions of dollars a year so that they can harass Palestinians and become a monster. We set up many bases that do no good and we bomb and put sanctions on Iraq. When you piss people off like that what do you expect? The philosophy in this country is too piss someone and when they retaliate, then you piss them off even more. We caused the problem and Al-Qaeda continued it.
@SuperMeatsause Oh yes, Israel is a monster and whatever happens happens. God, do Paulbots think about the future at all? So you think it would be better if Saddam was still in power? And when you blame the United States like that, is it any wonder why Paul supporters are alienated from the political world? And one of the biggest problems with you people is that you always say the U.S. caused all these problems in the past, yet you provide NO plans for the future, or an idea on how to fix things
@RoosterCogburn1008 what are you talking about? Ron Paul's plan for the future is to make friendships and prevent war and his domestic outlook is to make government limited and create prosperity. Are you calling Thomas Jefferson and George Washington alienated from the world? because Ron Paul has the same exact message as Washington and Jefferson! Ron Paul has TWICE AS MUCH MILITARY DONATIONS AS ALL THE OTHER GOP CANDIDATES COMBINED! I guess the military is alienated from the world as well.
@SuperMeatsause Paul just says "Let's be friends with Iran!" How? Iran is ruled by an evil dictator bent on our destruction. The Radical Islamists want us dead, and won't stop until they succeed, or we stop them. Paul is so incredibly stupid when it comes to foreign policy, he believes everyone wants peace; they don't! If you think for a second that if we just left them alone then they would stop attacking us, then you have no concept of reality. This isn't the 19th century. Respond when you
@RoosterCogburn1008 Are you retarded? Ron Paul is so incredibly stupid when it comes to foreign policy? Then why the hell does he have more military donations from active duty soldiers than all of the other GOP candidates combined?! Why is it that he is the only actual veteran? Why is it that he predicted 9/11 and under his command, we wouldn't be in so much debt now and the world would actually be in peace? Nobody wants peace? Huh.........
@RoosterCogburn1008 OMG you are like mentally retarded...Ron Paul gets more donations from active duty military than all of the other GOP candidates combined !! And you are calling him retarded on foreign policy...You might as well call George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and other presidents retarded on foreign policy because they all including Ron Paul all believe in non-interventionism. War with no objective equals debt and downgraded national security retard.
@SuperMeatsause Thanks for answering my question dumbass. I suppose that's the answer: YOU DON'T KNOW!!!!!! And Jefferson and Roosevelt were not non-interventionist, that's just REALLY stupid to say. No military and not responding to attacks downgrades national security!!!!!!! Why do Paulbots always think the world is a socialist utopia of peace!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!??
@RoosterCogburn1008 You obviously don't know U.S history because Washington, Jefferson, and Roosevelt were non-interventionists. War is just back and forth retard. We attack them then they attack us then we attack them etc. First of all, WE caused 9/11, instead of using our brains, we turned to military action. So if you keep bombing people....they will stop hating us? This war WILL NEVER END because we keep pissing them off and they keep retaliating. What is the goal of this war?
@SuperMeatsause You obviously don't know history. Roosevelt was no where near a noninterventionist, and it was Jefferson who called for an Empire of Liberty and was all excited to invade Canada! Yes, Washington was, read my post. So we give up, lose, and THEN THEY ATTACK AGAIN! Come on Paulbot, tell me what will make them stop attacking us!!!!! Are American lives worthless to you? Hell, I bet after 9/11 you would have apologized to the terrorists and say we got what was coming. You make me sick.
@RoosterCogburn1008 I don't know what you're talking about because if you search 'Thomas Jefferson', it will say he was a non-interventionist. I don't understand your logic....You think that even if we appease with them and we get our troops out and we help them rebuild and offer compensation, you think they will attack us again? You think they hate us because we are free or because we are American? maybe it's because we build bases there, we killed 1.5 million people, and we give Israel aid
@SuperMeatsause Look up what Jefferson actually did and supported, and you'll see why. You're talking about negotating with terrorists!!!!!!!! There has been tension going on between the middle east whatever was considered the west (Europe, then America) for over a thousand years. They want to kill us. Done. They will not stop! All you want to do is help them achieve their goal of setting up Islamic dictatorships, destroying America, and wiping out the Jews.
@RoosterCogburn1008 You just said that they will not stop. If that is the case then how the hell will we ever "win"? The only possible explanation is to drop several hydrogen bombs and blow up the middle east destroying Israel in the process. Jefferson and Washington warned not to make alliances and to stay out of the affairs of other nations. My philosophy is that if America offers real peace and compensation along with ending the war, and if after all of that, if they reject, then it's war.
@SuperMeatsause It's already war dumbass. We can continue to fight them, and continue to win the war. You want us to pull out right in the middle, so they can regain their strength, and BOOM! We start all over again, and all we did was waste lives and money. Washington said that, yes. Jefferson, no. He was a full supporter of the War of 1812, a U.S. attempt to gain Canada when Britain was weak. He also supported western expansion through war if necessary. He was not a non-interventionist. Duh.
@RoosterCogburn1008 Going to war for personal gains isn't interventionism. Interventionism is when you get involved in the affairs of other countries for example when Britain and France were fighting. We are actually losing the war because for every day our military is there, more and more terrorists come up and hate America. This war will NEVER end...The only way it will end is if our military kills every single Arab in the middle east which is impossible.
@SuperMeatsause I just love how you're defending Jefferson of the same things your accusing Cain and the other candidates of. Every day we are getting closer to winning the war and killing more of our enemies. This war can, and will be won. But you would just rather have us quit, come home, lay back, and wait to be attacked again.
@RoosterCogburn1008 The general public disapproves of the wars in the middle east so it is not necessary. We should only go to war if our national defense is at risk and it is not. So several Arabs crashed into the world trade center and all of a sudden we are spending trillions of dollars fighting a war that will never end. You think that if we keep bombing and setting up bases...people there will respect us? Herman Cain is going to go to war with China to stop them from getting nukes!! HAHA
@SuperMeatsause The fact that you just wrote off 911 like that with a wave of the hand is just disrespectful, and fucking disgusting. Do you care about American citizens AT ALL!?!?!?!
@RoosterCogburn1008 Dude of course 9/11 was a tragedy but it was totally preventable. You can't fight terrorism, it's a tactic. Just because 3,000 Americans die here doesn't mean we should kill over 500,000 Iraqis. That doesn't promote democratic and pro-human rights values that America stands for. Al-Qaeda has 3 distinctive motives for 9/11....if America stops pissing off people, then maybe our defense will be better and we will have money for important things like education and healthcare.
@RoosterCogburn1008 Let me take a wild guess........You are probably a Gingrich supporter am I correct? He's far better than Herman Cain but not even close to Ron Paul who is going to win Iowa and then the presidency.
@SuperMeatsause No, I'm content to join Romney by this point. Cain was the best possible candidate, and its sad to see him destroyed from a high-tech lynching from the media. First off, I highly doubt Paul will win Iowa. He might come in second, third, or even fourth depending on how Santorum does. And Ron Paul will never be President. He's just another RINO, and basically no one likes him. He's still 10% nationally, and will never go above it. Why he even says he's a Republican I have no idea.
@RoosterCogburn1008 Well Romney=Gingrich. Herman Cain was just an idiot and the only reason Newt Gingrich is in the top tier is because of Cain. Ron Paul is probably the best politician of this century. America will never see anyone like Ron Paul. Ron Paul is first in Iowa and will continue to go up. If Romney wins the nomination, Obama would be a better choice! There is a reason the entire military supports Ron Paul and the cherry on top is that he delivered 4,000 babies!
@SuperMeatsause An extremely successful businessman and ballistics analyst is an idiot? What world do you live in? Ron Paul is a pointless politician. He's done nothing in his congressional career, and I hope America never faces another Ron Paul. Ron Paul has hit his ceiling at 10% and will never go above it. People just don't like him. Obama is the worst choice, and the fact you would say differently just shows some of your more liberal leanings. The entire military supports Ron Paul? Now I
@SuperMeatsause know you're insane. True, Ron Paul has the most military related donors of all candidates. Now do you know the MICROSCOPIC number of military related people that donates to candidates? Nearly zero. Ron Paul has almost no military support, and its common for you Paulbots to manipulate facts to suit your agenda. Saying the entire military supports him is just a flat out lie that I doubt you'll admit. And why the hell does it matter that he's delivered babies?
@RoosterCogburn1008 I have no idea what you are talking about. Ron Paul received the most money from active duty military. The fact that he delivered 4,000 babies shows that he understands the value of life and he is a career doctor, not a crook like Mitt Romney. Look at it this way, if George Washington was alive today, he would undoubtedly vote for Ron Paul am I wrong. Who cares though, you probably hate all the founding fathers and the constitution as well!!
@SuperMeatsause Actually he receives the most from military related donors. So active duty, veterans, and basically anyone ever associated with the military. Which is still microscopic because like I said, the military doesn't really donate. How is Romney a crook? Or is that just another Paulbot insult? Ya you are wrong. I highly doubt Washington would vote for Paul if he saw the world today. No I don't hate the founding fathers or the constitution, but it seems a lot of Paulbots hate America.
@RoosterCogburn1008 Romney is the average politician which means he is a crook. He also gets most of his donations from banks and corporations. Besides, Romney is just making promises to fix the economy with his magic wand. He will probably start more wars with Iran and other countries which devastates the economy and creates more debt. Romney is also okay with things like the Patriot Act which the founding fathers would rage over. Romney =Obama
@SuperMeatsause By that logic, Ron Paul is an even bigger crook. Paul has spent over twenty years in the House, and is just as much if not more of a politician than Romney. And so what if he gets donations from banks and corporations? They run the economy, they make jobs, they make our way of life possible. And like the other candidates, he has a plan to fix the economy, not just a "magic wand." If a war with Iran happens, it'll be because they provoked it. And FYI, the Patriot Act is legal.
@RoosterCogburn1008 The Patriot Act is legal? The Patriot Act is the most Unconstitutional and most UnAmerican Act ever. They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety -Benjamin Franklin. I don't know about you, but I don't appreciate my own government tapping my phone line. You and Mitt Romney probably support NDAA. The only candidate that is fighting for liberty is a crook? That's America I guess.
@SuperMeatsause For the crook comment, I used your logic. You're saying it, not me. I don't think Romney or Paul is a crook, but you are because you said politicians are crooks. And both are politicians, Paul even more than Romney. Why would the government be tapping your phone line? Who do you know that is having your phones tapped? Who has had their phones tapped at all? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants- Thomas Jefferson
@RoosterCogburn1008 I don't know if the government is tapping anyone's phone line but just the fact that government is able to do so is wrong. Romney is only about creating jobs. Why not just pay a bunch of people to dig holes and refill them afterwards? Mitt Romney's foreign policy will create more debt and kill more people while downgrading our national security. Our government creates terrorists and then creates Acts like the Patriot Act, NDAA, and SOPA to try and stop it.
@SuperMeatsause Exactly, they aren't. And with the economy the way it is, is creating jobs BAD!? Romney's foreign policy will continue to keep us safe, while Paul's would just kill us. What do you think would happen with a nuclear Iran? He wouldn't downgrade security, he would just get rid of it. Paul is a dreamer, who thinks that even though the US is the most powerful country in the world with the biggest economy and military, we can just block ourselves out and hide. It can't and won't happen
@RoosterCogburn1008 Under a Ron Paul administration, America's defense would be the best. Ron Paul wants to cut spending on militarism which creates enemies around the world. Under a Romney administration, another event like 9/11 would happened because he would continue going to war and building military bases around the world which create more terrorism. Iran's nuclear program is overly exaggerated. America and Israel could wipe Iran off the map 100 times.
@SuperMeatsause Reverse that. Something like 911 would happen again under Paul because he would leave us defenseless, and allow our enemies to regroup and reattack us. Romney would continue fighting PEOPLE WHO ARE AT WAR WITH US. Fact: Paul would allow Iran to get the bomb. Yes, we could. So why do you want nuclear bombs to be used? If Iran gets the bomb, they will use it to attack Israel, and possibly us. Sure we could destroy them AFTER IT HAPPENS, but why let millions die in the first place?
@RoosterCogburn1008 No. Ron Paul would make America's defense very strong while cutting spending on militarism around the world. Look at the reasons for 9/11 described by Al-Qaeda. Building bases, putting sanctions on Iraq, and not giving Palestinians a fair trial. You can't fight fire with fire. Iran isn't that stupid, they know they have no chance and plus, there are Palestinians living in Israel and one of the most holy mosques is in Israel. This is all propaganda.....
@SuperMeatsause Paul would shrink the military= not good. Ah yes, Al-Qaeda. They attacked us, so lets reason with them? No. They started this war, and we'll finish it. Why can't you see that they'll attack us no matter what? Yes, Iran, unlike China or Russia for example, really is that stupid, and just listening to Ahmadinejad proves that. They only understand force. Do you really think the Iranians care? They see that Jews lives there, they'll blow the place up. They've said as much.
@RoosterCogburn1008 First of all, Ron Paul believes that no country should have weapons of mass destruction to begin with. Secondly, if any country poses any threat to the security and defense of the U.S, he will go to congress and declare war constitutionally, win the war quickly and efficiently, and take care of people at home. Iran would never use a nuke, unless they are totally mentally retarded. This whole mess with Iran started when we put the Shah in power.
@SuperMeatsause Well that won't happen. So why would he give them to an unstable country? No he says he would not go to war with Iran. They are a threat They want to attack us. They are totally mentally retarded, they're IRAN! They are not China or Russia who understand mutual destruction, they are Iran who only understands force are are completely and utterly insane! What is currently Iran has hated the Christian west since the Crusades. btw im atheist. And Paul gives no solution to the problem
@RoosterCogburn1008 Dude you are just falling to propaganda. The Iraq War was based on lies and propaganda. Did Iran ever attack anyone? No. You Neo-conservatives always think that another country will invade us or something. The best solution is to trade with countries, not bomb them! Mitt Romney is part of the status quo, his economic policy is basically about creating manufacturing jobs, his foreign policy will create more war and debt, and he is a flip-flopper.
@SuperMeatsause Copy and Paste this: Fake "Mitt Romney" Endorses Ron Paul before Iowa Caucus. Watch at least 9 minutes of it and after that tell me what you think. If after watching it and you are not a Ron Paul supporter, all I have to say is, you are not a true American. Before Ron Paul, I believed that America was a bunch of lies fed by a corrupt government led by corporations and elite influence. Ron Paul makes me love America and the rest make me hate it. Ron Paul 2012
@SuperMeatsause Wow. First, he looked nothing like Romney; should have got a better look alike. Second, I saw several manipulating of facts such as his military support, one flat out lie (Rick Perry was in the airforce), and the fact that there are clips of Jon Stewart and Bill Mahrer supporting him really says something (liberal). Romney on abortion? I make no comments on the subject of abortion so that doesn't matter to me. I think the fact that Rick Perry has been a conservative governor of
@RoosterCogburn1008 Ron Paul appeals to every political party because his ideas are popular. Ron Paul polls the highest with Independents, Democrats, and young people(the category I fall into). Just because Ron Paul opposes the war on terror doesn't make him a liberal. Liberals hate all war, Ron Paul hates unnecessary war and unconstitutional war. I believe that the illuminati runs the world and the only way that can be proved wrong is if Ron Paul is president
@SuperMeatsause First, Ron Paul has the lowest support ceiling of any candidate. No one likes him. And don't you think if he's running as a Republican, Republicans should at least support him!?!?!?!?!?! Wow, you seriously are a conspiracy nut. The fucking illuminati? Let me guess, the Da Vinci Code is real, the government shot JFK and caused 911, and we never went to the moon. Am I in your general realm of logic? I mean holy shit how can you be this stupid when it comes to reality???
@RoosterCogburn1008 No one likes Ron Paul? Is that why I see Ron Paul supporters all over my county? I have yet to see any other supporter from any other candidate. Ron Paul has the most dedicated supporters and frankly, no one likes Romney. Everyone is looking for an anti-Romney and the only reason Romney is the front runner is because he has been campaigning for almost 20 years and he buys peoples votes with his millions of dollars.
@RoosterCogburn1008 Oh and by the way, the former chief of the Osama Bin Laden tracking unit of the counterterrorism center of the CIA endorsed Ron Paul. Romney=More endless wars that bankrupt America and ultimately ends the US. I don't understand why people like you hate peace and trade? You think dropping bombs on people makes them like you? If you do, then you are an idiot. Let's see who benefits from war....oh, maybe the military industrial complex?
@SuperMeatsause Paul= More attacks on the U.S. that leads to more deaths, more destruction, and the end of us. I don't understand why people like you hate this country and love the people who swear to destroy it. Do you think letting them attack us with no action on our part or evacuating our bases will make them stop attacking us or hating us? I already know you're an conspiracy theorist dumbass. Let's see who benefits from our destruction...oh, maybe NO ONE BUT OUR ENEMIES!?!
@RoosterCogburn1008 So dropping bombs on people will make them respect us and like us? That's one twisted philosophy. 9/11 happened because of our interventionism so another attack like that would happen under a Romney presidency. Ron Paul wants to create friendships and peace and that is dangerous? Spending trillions and wasting valuable resources and wasting human life on endless wars. I see the US coming to the same ending as the Soviets.
@RoosterCogburn1008 Who benefits from war really? Our national security gets downgraded because we create more enemies, our economy gets downgraded because of the financial toll,and Americans are killed (usually minorities, not the rich white guys in the white house). The only ones that benefit are the military industrial complex and corporations. If you think the war is justified, why don't you enlist? Is your security REALLY at risk? If it is, fight for it you pansy.
@SuperMeatsause First, we're at war. They're already our enemies, whether you admit it or not. War costs money, that's what war is. If we stop fighting, that doesn't mean they'll stop fighting. I'm sorry if you can't realize that they don't want peace. Yes, Americans are killed and that's tragic. But even more will die if we sit back, and allow our shores to be attacked and our civilians killed. Wow, attacking the rich, you're cool. Hows the occupy movement going?
@RoosterCogburn1008 So they don't want peace? How can you ever win a war when neither side surrenders and signs a peace treaty? They don't hate America because it is free and prosperous, if they did, why don't they attack Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland? The ONLY ones who benefit from these endless wars are the military industrial complex. They make billions in profits while American lives are wasted and countless bombs are dropped.
@SuperMeatsause And really, you're calling me a pansy? Get a life, you fucked up, conspiracy reading, legalize crack, Paulbot. Stop listening to everything spouted by Paul, and actually look into facts and history.
@SuperMeatsause one of the most conservative states for over a decade disproves all allegations of liberalism. Newt and his affairs? Frankly, I don't support Newt. But the fact that 2/3 of these allegations dealt with social issues and not major ones also says something. The impressionable music to hit people on a subconscious level was a good touch. Plus I saw several clips of Paul where I know the response to the person he's talking to beats his argument, but they were completely cut out.
@SuperMeatsause And the fact that you say I'm not a true American, when you say a part of you hates America, just shows your hypocracy and uneducated thoughts on these matters. I am an American who whats this country to succeed and be the best in the world. I support low taxes, small government, working with fellow Americans, and a strong national defense. You just support the end of America. Ron Paul will never win. You better find a new conspiracy theory to latch on too.
@RoosterCogburn1008 Obama is going to beat Romney if he is the nominee. There is no way I would vote for him. Half of Ron Paul supporters would vote for Obama or just not vote at all. Any white guy can be like Romney. All he does is go up to a podium and say, "America is the greatest nation in the history of the world" and he becomes the frontrunner. The ONLY candidate that can beat Obama is Ron Paul. Mitt Romney will bring the country down.
@SuperMeatsause Do you read what you type? First, doesn't that prove that Ron Paul is just as, if not more liberal that Obama!?! Paul is not a conservative. And I have a question: are you an Obama supporter? Second, what does being white have to do with it? And Ron Paul is probably the only candidate that can't beat Obama. The GOP base doesn't support him whatsoever, and the Democrats will rally around Obama. Obama would beat Ron Paul in one of the biggest landslides in history.
@RoosterCogburn1008 Ron Paul isn't a conservative? He preaches small government and less taxes/regulations. He never voted for a tax increase and he never voted for anything that was unconstitutional. Hmm, So Romney can beat Obama? So Obama and Romney both supported the bank bailouts....ooh they have something in common! Obama can criticize Romney ALL DAY! Ron Paul leads a revolution and can't win but Romney who wins the moron vote, can? Sure......
@SuperMeatsause Yes, Ron Paul is not a conservative. Hell, he's left of Obama on many issues! Ron Paul, in 20 years in the House, has gotten one bill passed. Ya, great record....Yes, Romney, like most candidates, could beat Obama. Oh my god! You found a similarity between two candidates of opposing parties!? You're a fucking genius!! Seriously, get a life. What would Obama criticize Romney on? And if you're calling American voters morons, well, that's a pretty shitty view. Paul can't win.
@RoosterCogburn1008 Romney definitely wins the moron vote. Look at Paul's support: college students. Of course Ron Paul can't beat Romney when he gets a constant stream of money from Goldman Sachs and has an infinite supply of cash to campaign for the rest of his life. Most Americans are brain washed and fall to propaganda and war is all of a sudden the norm. I don't know of any other country that has participated in more wars than the U.S. Is that what we stand for?
@SuperMeatsause "The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home." - James Madison / If you really think that the most powerful nation on earth is at all in danger from any other country (especially one that is weak), then you are completely RETARDED. If this country ever comes down, it will probably be due to economic reasons, and not because of a lack of defense. Romney=Dropping bombs......Dropping bombs=weaker defense
@SuperMeatsause Do you know what nuclear weapons are? I'm talking about the leveling of an American city. Gone, off the map. No country with nuclear weapons can be considered weak, dumbass. I'm not saying a nuclear terrorist strike will end the country, I'm just saying it will possibly kill hundreds of millions of people. Now, I don't want that to happen. Yet you seem to be in favor of every insane dictator with a hate towards humanity have the most powerful weapon in history. Are you retarded?
@RoosterCogburn1008 No nation on Earth should have a nuclear weapon. Iran knows the might of America and Israel and they knows they would can obliterated within hours. You're being fooled by war propaganda. Maybe if you showed some respect to the leaders around the world that hate us, they wouldn't hate us! Ron Paul's philosophy: turn an enemy into an ally. So bombing Iran will make them like us? Thank you America for bombing us, we love you now...
@SuperMeatsause Nice to see you have such respect for you're countrymen. I mean, it just amazes me so much that people like you can hold such hatred for the U.S. Yes, college students: some of the most liberal people in the country. Then have you ever heard of a country other than the U.S.? Britain, Rome, I'm sure a lot of African countries, France, China is probably up there, German region, etc. History is a long time filled with literally hundreds of thousands of wars, most not within the last
@SuperMeatsause 200 years. The U.S. stands for freedom, conservatism, capitalism, and the greatest things in the world. Although you probably just see it as evil. Question: Why do you live here?
@RoosterCogburn1008 Romney's version of America is pretty evil. Put it this way, if the founding fathers were alive today, without any doubt, they would unanimously elect Ron Paul as president.
@SuperMeatsause You are just falling to conspiracy theories. Yes, they did; a lot. The fact you think Iran would "invade us" proves that you don't know wtf foreign policy is. Iran would attack us. Not send an army across the ocean and capture Washington in a siege. They would use nuclear terrorism, and other forms of underhanded warfare. They are at war with us. Why do you want to trade with people who are at war with us? Paul's foreign policy would just lead to death.
@SuperMeatsause The Iraq War was completely justified. Our intelligence, along with most intelligence of other countries, said he had WMDs. Not to mention he wouldn't let inspectors look. He constantly broke UN resolutions, he financially supported terrorists, he allowed terrorists to hide in his country, and since the Gulf War ended in a ceasefire without a treaty, we had the legal right to restart fighting whenever. Not to mention when we invaded we found he had enough anthrax to kill millions
@RoosterCogburn1008 Iraq never had WMD's, Saddam was never linked to Al-Qaeda, and Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11. If Saddam was such a bad guy, why did we support him before the Gulf War? We give him money and we rose him to power. It's something called propaganda. And you sir fall for it very easily.
@SuperMeatsause First, yes Saddam did, look it up. Saddam has been linked to Al-Qaeda, and plus its a War on TERROR. That means all terrorist groups, people/countries who fund terrorist groups, and people/countries that hide terrorist groups. Its hard to argue this point with you just because you have what seems no knowledge on the subject. We did not put him in power, and we only used him against Iran, a bigger enemy. Its something called logic and planning. And you sir have none of it.
@RoosterCogburn1008 If the president wanted to go to war with Pakistan tomorrow, we would. There is absolutely no hesitation to allow thousands of our soldiers to die, trillions of dollars to put us in debt, and the killing of American values. The government can create any propaganda as they choose and people like you fall for it. With leaders like Romney, the only thing America is known for is: WAR. Let's bomb the hell out of every person that disagrees with us!!!
@SuperMeatsause Why the fuck would we go to war with Pakistan right now? You libertarians never understand that we go to war FOR A REASON! Its not "Oh, I'm bored. Let's bomb Argentina." No. You would allow people who want to kill us to get weapons for which to kill us, then allow us to get killed? Ya, you're really saving lives there. There is no doubt in my mind that another 9/11 would happen under a Paul Presidency.
@SuperMeatsause Iraq or Afghanistan? And you're a libertarian, and I'm the retard? Jesus, when will you people learn that APPEASEMENT DOESN'T WORK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Let me guess, Hitler deserved Poland, right?
@RoosterCogburn1008 Appeasement works sometimes....just because it didn't work in world war 2 doesn't mean it doesn't always work. Hitler was greedy and wanted to control the world but Al-Qaeda doesn't want to take over the world. Terrorists barely have any power and Ron Paul's philosophy is that if you make friends, you won't have enemies. It's as simple as that. If we do EVERYTHING we can to be friends and they reject and start killing us again, then by all means, it's war.
@SuperMeatsause And there it is. The linchpin of your stupidity, and illogical thinking. Negotiation with terrorists. You're really fucked up in the mind, you know that?
@SuperMeatsause realize that. And wasn't it Jefferson who called for an Empire of Liberty? And who fully supported the War of 1812 and the Barbary Wars? Get a clue and stop believing in Socialist utopias.
@SuperMeatsause Just now saw this comment. Explain how 999 will become 30-30-30. Its basically impossible. And you put in another comment on how we should raise taxes on corporations. Do you just hate America, or do you believe in Socialism? Either way you're pretty liberal if you think we should tax businesses even harder. And Ron Paul would never garner more than 20% in a national election. And only 10% of those people would genuinely support him.
@RoosterCogburn1008 The only thing good about Herman Cain's 9-9-9 plan is the 9% corporate income tax which will probably generate some jobs but the rest of the plan seems like it is a plan for the rich. Lowering income taxes for the rich, raising taxes on the middle class, and raising taxes on goods? I don't understand that. Plus, under Herman Cain, debt will continue to rise because he will keep giving aid and starting more wars. Ron Paul's main concern is not taxes, it is creating prosperity.
@SuperMeatsause Hard to have prosperity when we're all dead. Cain would bring in the necessary cuts, but not from the military, which if anything should be increased, not slashed apart like in Paul's plan. Who do you think makes jobs? The rich. And it doesn't raise taxes on the middle class. Google the 999 calculator, and you'll see how cheaper things would be under his plan. Have you even read the plan?
@RoosterCogburn1008 The rich don't create jobs, businesses and corporations do, there is a difference. Where else can you cut besides the military? Oh, I know! How about education and healthcare !Let's keep feeding the military and downgrading our national security. I don't get how you think that the road to peace is through aggression and war. There is no military threat to the U.S. Iran will never even think about nuking anyone because they know they will lose!
didn't mean that to be rude, btw he destroyed santorum in a debate where santorum explained the history of libya in a book he wrote, and ron paul corrected him and destroyed his chances of book sales. just look for ron paul destroys santorum lol
obama cant even read a speach without a teleprompter. you democrats seem to foget that obama is a socialist. he's in this for himself, not for us as a country. as an independant, my vote goes to herman cain. he's a true leader, a true American, whos proven he knows how to raise money and lead people. he gives hope to us all. Obama's time is over. stop lying to yourselves and learn about ALL of the canidates. Learn for yourself and make a decision for the whole country. Vote Herman Cain 2012!
All GOP, TEA & DEM Love to Spend TRILLIONS on Continuing the Useless Wars & Occupations, and on Corporate Subsidies (Oil, Farm, etc.), and on Corporate Welfare (Wall-Street), and on Tax Cuts for the Rich, and on Israel (Endless Aid & Weapons for Israel every year), and on Pentagon (Trillions of Pentagon dollars Missing), and on 1500 Military Bases USA's Failing Empire has ALL OVER Earth. DEMS & GOP'S SPEND 24/7.
Government Prints Money (makes them worthless) and takes TRILLIONS in Chinese Loans
People we need to "Like" comments that are brave and true, do not be shy. we need to encourage comments that are well..against herman cains lies. we need to "Dislike" comments based on racism and lies no matter which politician they support. we need to reply to comments based on fear and ensure them they will be alright if they research and vote for Ron Paul.
@mojorisingist It's when people research Ron Paul that they get turned away from his policies. He's great when it comes to finances and the fed, but his foreign policy is worse than a kindergarteners. He is an absolute idiot when it comes to Islamic history and for that he will never in this lifetime become the president. Never.
@DontFriendInviteMe so what about islamic history is he an idiot about. it seems to me he is the most well informed and understanding of their history than any other candidate. perhaps it is you who is misinformed. i suggest talking with somone in iran or isreal or libya or whatever islam country. its very easy with facebook, skype, or emails now. i'm betting that they are most likely to like ron pauls foreighn polocy and be more willing than you to have peace.
@mojorisingist Riiiight .. I've studied it for 20 years, I was married to a muslim for 10 yrs, I've lived in TWO muslim countries, & biblical history is one of my favorite subjects, but dumbass Ron Paul knows more about it than me. You shove your head deeper up his ass so you don't have to see anybody else's thoughts but his. He wont win, you watch. You might fake how many of you are online, but you can't increase your numbers at the voting booth. You don't even know what the crusades were about
@mojorisingist by the way ... my ex WAS IRANIAN! So shove it you arrogant, closed minded, RonPaulbot pig. I only disagreed with half of Ron Paul's ideas at the beginning of this year, because of you fucking assholes all over the internet, now I fucking hate him with all of my being, and I never want to see his face or hear his name again. You've turned half of America against him because you are suck fucking assholes!
@DontFriendInviteMe wow i walked right into that one. if i were you i'de get over it and rely on your own research and discernment rather than others. you dont seem to be good with dealing with most americans.
@SuperMeatsause @RoosterCogburn1008 Gosh, take it to the DMs or your own YouTube channel comments!
NewsAndTech1 2 months ago
i love watching this a fucking loser
adamsjeme 3 months ago
Oooops!
Hotdiggity11 3 months ago
who in the fuck is gonna vote for this lying perv..!!
fleiva30 3 months ago
DEAR GOD, NO, ANYONE BUT THIS MAN, ANYONE!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
TheAdjundantReflex 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Herman Cain didn't know that China ALREADY HAS NUKES, said he was going to prevent them from getting nukes. I kid you not. More embarrassing than the sexual accusations against him.
/watch?v=U5HiIgbHAzQ
vechorik 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
please go to ( 9 9 9 calculator . net ) Go Herman Cain!!!!!
akonidai 4 months ago
Go Cain Go!
rstryker27 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's not enough to say "Vote Ron Paul"
PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES IN MOST STATES.
IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.
IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.
IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !
WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste this everywhere! Thumbs up!
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Herman Cain is ignorant of the corruption that exists in the Federal Reserve. Just like Obama, he talks a good talk and walks a good walk; and just like Obama, people are falling in love with his personality. To make matters worse, he flat out LIED in the debate Tuesday night. WE DO NOT NEED THIS FED INSIDER IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!!
Sistarovat 5 months ago
Herman Cain is a fed agent!!!! nothing he says makes sense !!! 9-9-9 is a joke and Herman Cain is going to increase the debt because he will continue to give aid to Israel and other countries. 9-9-9 will become 30-30-30 !!!
SuperMeatsause 5 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Troll
ripham247 4 months ago
@ripham247 search on youtube: why ron paul must be president. i dare you to search about ron paul and youtube and see how absolutely great he is. you will see how every video he has has about 100% likes...you will see how he makes so much sense and how he has the most military soldier donations. Ron Paul is a genius and the media ignores him because he is a threat to big banks and corporations.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause I respect Paul's economic policies very much. but the fact of the matter is that his foreign policy is to dangerous for the most powerful nation in the world. Herman Cain is the perfect man for the job right now. Some may say he doesn't have foreign policy experience, but that is not something you attain before the presidency. Please vote for Cain.
ripham247 4 months ago
@ripham247 I will never vote for Cain. Ron Paul's foreign policy is so ingenious !!!!! He's going to cut all aid to foreign countries and Israel which will cut spending, Ron Paul is perhaps one the of the greatest politicians to ever live and it hurts me so much that he isn't in first place. It's funny...most voters want to increase taxes for corporations and Cain and Romney are lowering corporate taxes and people vote for him. Just pathetic. Vote Ron Paul if you want a REAL leader.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
Comment removed
LeCreuset05 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You do know that Iran tried to organize a terrorist attack on our soil
recently right? If I recall correctly, Ron Paul said that he was in favor
of a foreign policy very similar to George W. Bush when he first ran
for President in 2000. I think you and I both know what happened next.
LeCreuset05 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Yay! Abandoning our allies, sounds like tons of fun! Ron Paul is a delusional old man. And no, a lot of people don't want to raise taxes on corporations, just the opposite. Herman Cain is the best possible choice. Paul couldn't lead a fish to water. And what do you mean the media ignores him? He's been on FOX News 47 times since he announced his candidacy, and over 70 since the start of the year. Hell, he's on FOX right now! His videos are so well liked because of Paulbots like u
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 you probably don't even know why Israel is our ally...George Washington even advised not to make international alliances. So Herman Cain was an executive crook, he worked for the fed, he has no political experience, he supported the bank bailouts, he wants to raise taxes on the poor and middle class and make the rich get richer. Ron Paul has the lowest spending budget. He wants to completely stop foreign aid and military spending and wants to end the IRS and the fed.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Cain is not a crook (name something he's done illegally), being a FED chairman for one year doesn't make him Satan, he has no political experience (which is good), most people supported the bailouts (just not how they were executed), and he wants everyone to pay low taxes (BIG conservative stance). I assumed Libertarian liked low taxes. Exactly, Ron Paul wants to cut the military (not the best thing to do in the middle of a war). 999 would make the IRS obsolete, duh.
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 how is having no political experience good? are you saying that colleges shouldn't offer political science as a major? Herman Cain is so stupid. He knows nothing about foreign policy, he admits that. Right now people are paying low taxes and under 999 they will pay way more. and guess what...the rich will pay less. Ron Paul was the only one who didn't support the theory of the bank bailouts. Cutting the military is genius, less deaths, less terrorism, and less debt.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause The last thing we need right now is a career politician who will just screw things up more. We need an experienced business, and Herman Cain is just that. Barely any President has foreign policy experience before taking office. And he says he would listen to what the actual generals have to say, which is a pretty damn good idea. And are you actually defending our current tax system? Where the lower 50% don't pay anything and the upper 50 pay it all? Everyone pays little under the
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause 999 plan. Look up the actual details of it. And cutting the military is the last thing you want to do when WE'RE AT WAR!!!!! That means more deaths, a lot more terrorism, but yes, less debt. But if you want less debt at the cost of thousands of American civilian death, well, too bad.
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 we're not at war. these wars are never ending. you don't even know what the war is about. We gave the taliban 3 billion dollars and we supported them when the soviets invaded afghanistan. what gives us any right to invade their country and establish OUR version of democracy. America has set up all the dictators in the world and we trained Al-Qaeda. Oh and 1.5 million Iraq's died in the war. Does that seem fair? It's all about world domination and oil my friend.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Are you delusional? Of course were at war, have you been in a coma for the last decade? And yes, I know what the war is about, I only wonder if you do. We supported them against the soviets, who were a much bigger threat. Now that the Soviets are gone, we deal with the others. We have the right because they attacked us, lost, and now we're trying to prevent it from happening again! The U.S. didn't set up all the dictators. And if it was about oil, wouldn't we have some!?!?!?!?!?!
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Libertarians always overlook that. If it was about us getting oil, we would actually have oil!!! Or we would have invaded a place that a significant amount of oil, like Saudi Arabia. None of what the Libertarians say make sense. Its just anti-American propaganda. I care about the military deaths of OUR country, not the other. Why? Because I only care about this one! Libertarians are the same as socialists in that aspect, they all scream for world solidarity between people.
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 dude, non of the middle-eastern countries are a threat to us. They have no air force and they can't invade us. The only legit war our country has fought was the revolutionary war. Britain invaded and occupied us and we fought back in self defense, self determination, and freedom. We have killed 1.5 million Iraqis. Most U.S soldiers die from SUICIDE. If they were REALLY FIGHTING FOR A CAUSE, why would they commit suicide? At the same time, we create more terrorism.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Are you a time traveler from 1800? Its called fucking terrorism! You think people are worried about an Iranian army marching onto U.S. soil? No, we're worried about terrorist attacks on our soil supported by their government. Most of the Middle Eastern countries (Iran, Syria, Pakistan, possibly Egypt) are a threat to us! And you pulled that out of your ass; most U.S. soldiers do not die from suicide. And suicides happen in the military because war is hell if you haven't noticed.
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 dude you can't stop terrorism by killing more people. For every one person killed, 10 more develop hatred towards us. Why is that they are terrorists but our soldiers aren't? We have killed 1.5 million Iraqis, we have killed hundreds of thousands of children and innocent civilians. They are terrorists and so are we. Going overseas and killing and bombing will only create more terrorism and hatred. You can look it up, most military deaths are from suicides...
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause First, if you're calling our troops terrorists, then Paulbots hate the military more than I thought...We are trying to stop terrorism, which is why we spend so much money there, helping the civilians! And do you honestly think that if we pull out, they'll say "Oh, we're sorry, let's friends"? No, they will attack us again and you will have sacrificed even more American lives because you believe everyone loves peace! And I did look it up, most deaths in the military aren't from s.
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 I'm not calling them terrorists...I'm just saying, why are arabs terrorists but our soldiers aren't terrorists? they both kill. We are not helping the civilians there. We killed over 1.5 million Iraqis. I bet you less than 10% of them were militants. We are bombing recklessly and killing children and innocent people. Sounds like freedom right? Oh and Ron Paul has the more donations from active duty soldiers than all of the other republican candidate COMBINED.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause "They are terrorists and so are we." Yes, you did say that! And I have a question: how many people would Saddam have killed by now? Wars are bloody, and every war for freedom has casualties. And it strikes me that your opinion would stop killing over there, and just bring it here. Or do think we deserve it? All you libertarians play the same tune.
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 I'm saying that if you call them terrorists, then our troops can be labeled as terrorists as well.So you're saying that it takes the expense of millions of lives to kill one man? Look at Libya, we barely helped them and they killed Gaddafi by themselves. We shouldn't be the policemen of the world. We should have killed Hussein just like how we killed Osama. Osama was in Pakistan but we aren't at war with Pakistan... IMO it was all for oil.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Who is calling the troops terrorists, except the terrorists? Ya, Libya was a mistake. We police the world looking out for our own self interests, which helps everyone. If we had just assassinated Hussein, I would have given it maybe 5 minutes before Iran jumped at the chance to have basic control over Iraq; not to mention at the time we thought he was WMDs, so no we couldn't do that. No, we're not a war with Pakistan. But our enemy was, so we shot him= beautiful. Its a shame Paul
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause thinks it was wrong. And why is it all liberals think it was over oil? If it was, WE WOULD HAVE FUCKING OIL AND NOT HIGH GAS PRICES!!!!! How hard is that to understand? And if we did take oil, why is everyone complaining that we didn't take oil!?!?!?!?! And if we wanted to go to war over oil, we should have invaded a country with at least some valuable oil reserves, like Saudi Arabia. You people don't think things through well, do you?
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 We don't go to wars if it doesn't benefit anyone. The only ones who benefited from the war were corporations and oil men who financed Bush's presidency. I don't think we spent trillions to liberate the people of Iraq. We gave weapons of mass destruction to Iraq. It's all global domination. Destroy their infrastructure and take their resources and when all the oil is dried up, then we start to drill here. You have to look at the motives.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause No, you need to look at the motives, because the ones you say have no basis. We spent trillions in Iraq fighting a war, and showing the people there that we're on their side, via giving them their freedom in a better government, improving schools, and roads. No, America did not give Iraq WMDs, and I don't even want to know the bullshit blog you got that from. The U.S. doesn't need to try to dominate the globe BECAUSE WE ALREADY DO! People who benefited from the Iraq War= everyone
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause We've improved there infrastructure, and they still have their oil. Where ever you're getting your information, the source seems like just LL= Libertarian Lies.
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 improved their infrastructure?!? what the hell? we dropped hundreds of bombs and turned their cities into war grounds and reduced it to ruble. We shouldn't rebuild other countries in the first place. Our infrastructure is in pretty bad shape but we don't have money to improve that? We don't have to be the policemen of the world. if the people don't like Saddam Hussein, they can do what the Libyans did to Gaddafi. Herman Cain knows NOTHING about foreign policy.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Once again you ignore everything presented to you. At least Cain's foreign policy isn't openly antiAmerican like Paul's. Alright, tell me: If the United States doesn't protect itself from foreign threats, what do you think will happen? Everyone will lay down their arms, hold hands, and sing around a big oak tree in a socialist utopia? Nope. Innocent people will die, and peace will NEVER be able to exist. You need to stop thinking like a liberal and get some common sense and logic
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
Comment removed
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 OK first of all, Iran nor Iraq have an air force to attack us, we have thousands of nukes to threaten Iran with so that they don't use one, and if we develop friendships with them then they won't hate our guts! Herman Cain is anti-peace and pro-war. War will destroy the earth you retard. Why can we have nukes but Iran can't? We used 2 nukes on Japan! The soviet union and china have nukes and we are friends...Herman Cain is an ignorant turd who will never win anything.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Two things you've obviously never heard of: terrorism, and peace through strength. Iran doesn't want to be our friend, they just want to see us die. Not the best way to form a friendship, huh? Peace is a two-way street you idiot. All countries like Iran understand is brute strength. We have the strength, so they don't attack in any way. And do you imagine Iranian planes bombing American cities and launching a nuclear bomb from their country? If you do you're a moron. Its called
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause nuclear terrorism. They give a nuclear bomb to a terrorist organization, which they then use to attack us. That is why Iran can't have a nuke. Would you put that weapon into the hands of an unstable islamic dictatorship who suppresses freedom and exploits racism? China and the Soviets actually care if they get destroyed or not. You can't compare them to Iran at all. And you're saying Cain is unelectable? This coming from a supporter of the Republican version of Joe Biden? HA!
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Again, America is the only country to ever to use a nuke but we are trusted. Japan attacked a strategic base and we dropped a couple of nukes and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people. What gives us a right to say who can and can't have nukes? No one should have nukes but it is not fair for a couple of nations to have superior authority over others. That is called global domination which is very wrong. We created the beast and we don't know how to deal with it.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause We ended the biggest war in the history of man kind by dropping those bombs. Whether a complete invasion of Japan, suicide missions by the Japanese, and an occupation of the islands would have cost more lives is debatable. Its called American exceptionalism. That's the biggest problem with you libertarians/liberals. For whatever reason, you hate the fact that the U.S. is the biggest world power. And if you would trust ANY country with a nuclear bomb, you really are insane.
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 American exceptionalism is very wrong. To say that America is the best country in the world because it just is is flat out wrong. Iran will never use a nuke and all of the things Israel and America are doing to threaten Iran is just wrong. The only reason we are the biggest world power is that we took advantage of other people. Being a world power is like being a dictator on a larger scale. The longer we continue that war in the middle east, the more our defense will suffer.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause America is the best country in the world because we are the leaders of the free world, and have led the charge of Republican forms of government for over 200 years. Disagreeing with that is why most Americans say Ron Paul is anti-American. Iran will never use a nuke as long as they don't get one. If they do, you can say good bye to at least one U.S. city and millions of people. There will always be a world power, thats not even political, its just an unchangeable fact of nature.
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause The question is, would you rather see a country like Russia or China dominate the world? The U.S. won its spot fair and square by being the best country on the planet. And the longer we provide our enemies the chance to strike and give them the ability to hurt us, the more our defense will suffer. All leaving the middle east would do is bring the fight to American soil, where our civilians will die. And why are Paulbots so much in love with Iran?
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Seriously, its like you Paulbots openly hate freedom of any kind. Why is that?
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 I have no idea why you would say that. Ron Paul is a libertarian which means he bases his political views on liberty, freedom, and prosperity for all. Ron Paul supporters want freedom for all and the reason Ron Paul is so different is that his philosophy on constitutional government is revolutionary. He wants to bring government back to what it was originally intended to do as our founding fathers established it. The rest are wall street crooks ESPECIALLY Cain and Romney !
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause First of all, Cain isn't a wall street businessman. Second, whats wrong with wall street businessman? Sounds like an occupier complaint to me. And I say that because it seems no matter what happens, libertarians always defend Iran; its our fault they're so radical; they're no threat; they want to be friends; they deserve a nuclear weapon; the U.S. is the cause of all problems. That is why people hate libertarians so much. You always take the sides of tyrannical dictators that
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause First of all, Cain isn't a wall street businessman. Second, whats wrong with wall street businessman? Sounds like an occupier complaint to me. And I say that because it seems no matter what happens, libertarians always defend Iran; its our fault they're so radical; they're no threat; they want to be friends; they deserve a nuclear weapon; the U.S. is the cause of all problems. That is why people hate libertarians so much. You always take the sides of tyrannical dictators that
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Herman Cain and Mitt Romney supported the TARP bailouts. Herman Cain is a CEO not really a businessman. I'm not taking the side of Iran or any other country. I just feel like every republican candidate especially Cain's foreign policy is just plain retarded. Peace through strength and clarity? That's solves every problem in the world. Ron Paul's foreign policy is the foreign policy of Washington and Jefferson. Enough said.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause suppress liberty, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of protest. Why do you people always take the side of dictators and Al-Qaeda over America?
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 We are helping Al-Qaeda when we send troops there because they can attack troops far more easily. We should build a strong defense built around non-interventionism and understand why they are our enemies. The theory that they hate us because we are free is a bunch of bullshit that the neo-conservatives and the media made up. Al-Qaeda had 3 motives for 9/11 and 9/11 wouldn't have happened if we had a non-interventionist foreign policy.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause By neo-con I assume you mean conservative since neither Democrats or libertarians are conservative. All you want to do is leave the enemy alone so they can plot to attack us. What is wrong with an enemy that declared war on us? And you just proved my point! Saying that it is America's fault 9/11 happened is taking Al-Qaeda's side!!!!!!!!
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 The reason 9/11 happened revolves around our interventionism in the middle east. We give Israel billions of dollars a year so that they can harass Palestinians and become a monster. We set up many bases that do no good and we bomb and put sanctions on Iraq. When you piss people off like that what do you expect? The philosophy in this country is too piss someone and when they retaliate, then you piss them off even more. We caused the problem and Al-Qaeda continued it.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Oh yes, Israel is a monster and whatever happens happens. God, do Paulbots think about the future at all? So you think it would be better if Saddam was still in power? And when you blame the United States like that, is it any wonder why Paul supporters are alienated from the political world? And one of the biggest problems with you people is that you always say the U.S. caused all these problems in the past, yet you provide NO plans for the future, or an idea on how to fix things
RoosterCogburn1008 4 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 what are you talking about? Ron Paul's plan for the future is to make friendships and prevent war and his domestic outlook is to make government limited and create prosperity. Are you calling Thomas Jefferson and George Washington alienated from the world? because Ron Paul has the same exact message as Washington and Jefferson! Ron Paul has TWICE AS MUCH MILITARY DONATIONS AS ALL THE OTHER GOP CANDIDATES COMBINED! I guess the military is alienated from the world as well.
SuperMeatsause 4 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Paul just says "Let's be friends with Iran!" How? Iran is ruled by an evil dictator bent on our destruction. The Radical Islamists want us dead, and won't stop until they succeed, or we stop them. Paul is so incredibly stupid when it comes to foreign policy, he believes everyone wants peace; they don't! If you think for a second that if we just left them alone then they would stop attacking us, then you have no concept of reality. This isn't the 19th century. Respond when you
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Are you retarded? Ron Paul is so incredibly stupid when it comes to foreign policy? Then why the hell does he have more military donations from active duty soldiers than all of the other GOP candidates combined?! Why is it that he is the only actual veteran? Why is it that he predicted 9/11 and under his command, we wouldn't be in so much debt now and the world would actually be in peace? Nobody wants peace? Huh.........
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause HOW THE FUCK WOULD THE WORLD BE IN PEACE!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?! DO YOU LISTEN TO THE SHIT THAT COMES OUT OF YOUR MOUTH!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 OMG you are like mentally retarded...Ron Paul gets more donations from active duty military than all of the other GOP candidates combined !! And you are calling him retarded on foreign policy...You might as well call George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and other presidents retarded on foreign policy because they all including Ron Paul all believe in non-interventionism. War with no objective equals debt and downgraded national security retard.
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Thanks for answering my question dumbass. I suppose that's the answer: YOU DON'T KNOW!!!!!! And Jefferson and Roosevelt were not non-interventionist, that's just REALLY stupid to say. No military and not responding to attacks downgrades national security!!!!!!! Why do Paulbots always think the world is a socialist utopia of peace!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!??
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 You obviously don't know U.S history because Washington, Jefferson, and Roosevelt were non-interventionists. War is just back and forth retard. We attack them then they attack us then we attack them etc. First of all, WE caused 9/11, instead of using our brains, we turned to military action. So if you keep bombing people....they will stop hating us? This war WILL NEVER END because we keep pissing them off and they keep retaliating. What is the goal of this war?
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause You obviously don't know history. Roosevelt was no where near a noninterventionist, and it was Jefferson who called for an Empire of Liberty and was all excited to invade Canada! Yes, Washington was, read my post. So we give up, lose, and THEN THEY ATTACK AGAIN! Come on Paulbot, tell me what will make them stop attacking us!!!!! Are American lives worthless to you? Hell, I bet after 9/11 you would have apologized to the terrorists and say we got what was coming. You make me sick.
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 I don't know what you're talking about because if you search 'Thomas Jefferson', it will say he was a non-interventionist. I don't understand your logic....You think that even if we appease with them and we get our troops out and we help them rebuild and offer compensation, you think they will attack us again? You think they hate us because we are free or because we are American? maybe it's because we build bases there, we killed 1.5 million people, and we give Israel aid
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Look up what Jefferson actually did and supported, and you'll see why. You're talking about negotating with terrorists!!!!!!!! There has been tension going on between the middle east whatever was considered the west (Europe, then America) for over a thousand years. They want to kill us. Done. They will not stop! All you want to do is help them achieve their goal of setting up Islamic dictatorships, destroying America, and wiping out the Jews.
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 You just said that they will not stop. If that is the case then how the hell will we ever "win"? The only possible explanation is to drop several hydrogen bombs and blow up the middle east destroying Israel in the process. Jefferson and Washington warned not to make alliances and to stay out of the affairs of other nations. My philosophy is that if America offers real peace and compensation along with ending the war, and if after all of that, if they reject, then it's war.
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause It's already war dumbass. We can continue to fight them, and continue to win the war. You want us to pull out right in the middle, so they can regain their strength, and BOOM! We start all over again, and all we did was waste lives and money. Washington said that, yes. Jefferson, no. He was a full supporter of the War of 1812, a U.S. attempt to gain Canada when Britain was weak. He also supported western expansion through war if necessary. He was not a non-interventionist. Duh.
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Going to war for personal gains isn't interventionism. Interventionism is when you get involved in the affairs of other countries for example when Britain and France were fighting. We are actually losing the war because for every day our military is there, more and more terrorists come up and hate America. This war will NEVER end...The only way it will end is if our military kills every single Arab in the middle east which is impossible.
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause I just love how you're defending Jefferson of the same things your accusing Cain and the other candidates of. Every day we are getting closer to winning the war and killing more of our enemies. This war can, and will be won. But you would just rather have us quit, come home, lay back, and wait to be attacked again.
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 The general public disapproves of the wars in the middle east so it is not necessary. We should only go to war if our national defense is at risk and it is not. So several Arabs crashed into the world trade center and all of a sudden we are spending trillions of dollars fighting a war that will never end. You think that if we keep bombing and setting up bases...people there will respect us? Herman Cain is going to go to war with China to stop them from getting nukes!! HAHA
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause The fact that you just wrote off 911 like that with a wave of the hand is just disrespectful, and fucking disgusting. Do you care about American citizens AT ALL!?!?!?!
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Dude of course 9/11 was a tragedy but it was totally preventable. You can't fight terrorism, it's a tactic. Just because 3,000 Americans die here doesn't mean we should kill over 500,000 Iraqis. That doesn't promote democratic and pro-human rights values that America stands for. Al-Qaeda has 3 distinctive motives for 9/11....if America stops pissing off people, then maybe our defense will be better and we will have money for important things like education and healthcare.
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Let me take a wild guess........You are probably a Gingrich supporter am I correct? He's far better than Herman Cain but not even close to Ron Paul who is going to win Iowa and then the presidency.
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause No, I'm content to join Romney by this point. Cain was the best possible candidate, and its sad to see him destroyed from a high-tech lynching from the media. First off, I highly doubt Paul will win Iowa. He might come in second, third, or even fourth depending on how Santorum does. And Ron Paul will never be President. He's just another RINO, and basically no one likes him. He's still 10% nationally, and will never go above it. Why he even says he's a Republican I have no idea.
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Well Romney=Gingrich. Herman Cain was just an idiot and the only reason Newt Gingrich is in the top tier is because of Cain. Ron Paul is probably the best politician of this century. America will never see anyone like Ron Paul. Ron Paul is first in Iowa and will continue to go up. If Romney wins the nomination, Obama would be a better choice! There is a reason the entire military supports Ron Paul and the cherry on top is that he delivered 4,000 babies!
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause An extremely successful businessman and ballistics analyst is an idiot? What world do you live in? Ron Paul is a pointless politician. He's done nothing in his congressional career, and I hope America never faces another Ron Paul. Ron Paul has hit his ceiling at 10% and will never go above it. People just don't like him. Obama is the worst choice, and the fact you would say differently just shows some of your more liberal leanings. The entire military supports Ron Paul? Now I
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause know you're insane. True, Ron Paul has the most military related donors of all candidates. Now do you know the MICROSCOPIC number of military related people that donates to candidates? Nearly zero. Ron Paul has almost no military support, and its common for you Paulbots to manipulate facts to suit your agenda. Saying the entire military supports him is just a flat out lie that I doubt you'll admit. And why the hell does it matter that he's delivered babies?
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 I have no idea what you are talking about. Ron Paul received the most money from active duty military. The fact that he delivered 4,000 babies shows that he understands the value of life and he is a career doctor, not a crook like Mitt Romney. Look at it this way, if George Washington was alive today, he would undoubtedly vote for Ron Paul am I wrong. Who cares though, you probably hate all the founding fathers and the constitution as well!!
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Actually he receives the most from military related donors. So active duty, veterans, and basically anyone ever associated with the military. Which is still microscopic because like I said, the military doesn't really donate. How is Romney a crook? Or is that just another Paulbot insult? Ya you are wrong. I highly doubt Washington would vote for Paul if he saw the world today. No I don't hate the founding fathers or the constitution, but it seems a lot of Paulbots hate America.
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Romney is the average politician which means he is a crook. He also gets most of his donations from banks and corporations. Besides, Romney is just making promises to fix the economy with his magic wand. He will probably start more wars with Iran and other countries which devastates the economy and creates more debt. Romney is also okay with things like the Patriot Act which the founding fathers would rage over. Romney =Obama
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause By that logic, Ron Paul is an even bigger crook. Paul has spent over twenty years in the House, and is just as much if not more of a politician than Romney. And so what if he gets donations from banks and corporations? They run the economy, they make jobs, they make our way of life possible. And like the other candidates, he has a plan to fix the economy, not just a "magic wand." If a war with Iran happens, it'll be because they provoked it. And FYI, the Patriot Act is legal.
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 The Patriot Act is legal? The Patriot Act is the most Unconstitutional and most UnAmerican Act ever. They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety -Benjamin Franklin. I don't know about you, but I don't appreciate my own government tapping my phone line. You and Mitt Romney probably support NDAA. The only candidate that is fighting for liberty is a crook? That's America I guess.
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause For the crook comment, I used your logic. You're saying it, not me. I don't think Romney or Paul is a crook, but you are because you said politicians are crooks. And both are politicians, Paul even more than Romney. Why would the government be tapping your phone line? Who do you know that is having your phones tapped? Who has had their phones tapped at all? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants- Thomas Jefferson
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 I don't know if the government is tapping anyone's phone line but just the fact that government is able to do so is wrong. Romney is only about creating jobs. Why not just pay a bunch of people to dig holes and refill them afterwards? Mitt Romney's foreign policy will create more debt and kill more people while downgrading our national security. Our government creates terrorists and then creates Acts like the Patriot Act, NDAA, and SOPA to try and stop it.
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Exactly, they aren't. And with the economy the way it is, is creating jobs BAD!? Romney's foreign policy will continue to keep us safe, while Paul's would just kill us. What do you think would happen with a nuclear Iran? He wouldn't downgrade security, he would just get rid of it. Paul is a dreamer, who thinks that even though the US is the most powerful country in the world with the biggest economy and military, we can just block ourselves out and hide. It can't and won't happen
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Under a Ron Paul administration, America's defense would be the best. Ron Paul wants to cut spending on militarism which creates enemies around the world. Under a Romney administration, another event like 9/11 would happened because he would continue going to war and building military bases around the world which create more terrorism. Iran's nuclear program is overly exaggerated. America and Israel could wipe Iran off the map 100 times.
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Reverse that. Something like 911 would happen again under Paul because he would leave us defenseless, and allow our enemies to regroup and reattack us. Romney would continue fighting PEOPLE WHO ARE AT WAR WITH US. Fact: Paul would allow Iran to get the bomb. Yes, we could. So why do you want nuclear bombs to be used? If Iran gets the bomb, they will use it to attack Israel, and possibly us. Sure we could destroy them AFTER IT HAPPENS, but why let millions die in the first place?
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 No. Ron Paul would make America's defense very strong while cutting spending on militarism around the world. Look at the reasons for 9/11 described by Al-Qaeda. Building bases, putting sanctions on Iraq, and not giving Palestinians a fair trial. You can't fight fire with fire. Iran isn't that stupid, they know they have no chance and plus, there are Palestinians living in Israel and one of the most holy mosques is in Israel. This is all propaganda.....
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Paul would shrink the military= not good. Ah yes, Al-Qaeda. They attacked us, so lets reason with them? No. They started this war, and we'll finish it. Why can't you see that they'll attack us no matter what? Yes, Iran, unlike China or Russia for example, really is that stupid, and just listening to Ahmadinejad proves that. They only understand force. Do you really think the Iranians care? They see that Jews lives there, they'll blow the place up. They've said as much.
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 First of all, Ron Paul believes that no country should have weapons of mass destruction to begin with. Secondly, if any country poses any threat to the security and defense of the U.S, he will go to congress and declare war constitutionally, win the war quickly and efficiently, and take care of people at home. Iran would never use a nuke, unless they are totally mentally retarded. This whole mess with Iran started when we put the Shah in power.
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Well that won't happen. So why would he give them to an unstable country? No he says he would not go to war with Iran. They are a threat They want to attack us. They are totally mentally retarded, they're IRAN! They are not China or Russia who understand mutual destruction, they are Iran who only understands force are are completely and utterly insane! What is currently Iran has hated the Christian west since the Crusades. btw im atheist. And Paul gives no solution to the problem
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Dude you are just falling to propaganda. The Iraq War was based on lies and propaganda. Did Iran ever attack anyone? No. You Neo-conservatives always think that another country will invade us or something. The best solution is to trade with countries, not bomb them! Mitt Romney is part of the status quo, his economic policy is basically about creating manufacturing jobs, his foreign policy will create more war and debt, and he is a flip-flopper.
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Copy and Paste this: Fake "Mitt Romney" Endorses Ron Paul before Iowa Caucus. Watch at least 9 minutes of it and after that tell me what you think. If after watching it and you are not a Ron Paul supporter, all I have to say is, you are not a true American. Before Ron Paul, I believed that America was a bunch of lies fed by a corrupt government led by corporations and elite influence. Ron Paul makes me love America and the rest make me hate it. Ron Paul 2012
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Wow. First, he looked nothing like Romney; should have got a better look alike. Second, I saw several manipulating of facts such as his military support, one flat out lie (Rick Perry was in the airforce), and the fact that there are clips of Jon Stewart and Bill Mahrer supporting him really says something (liberal). Romney on abortion? I make no comments on the subject of abortion so that doesn't matter to me. I think the fact that Rick Perry has been a conservative governor of
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Ron Paul appeals to every political party because his ideas are popular. Ron Paul polls the highest with Independents, Democrats, and young people(the category I fall into). Just because Ron Paul opposes the war on terror doesn't make him a liberal. Liberals hate all war, Ron Paul hates unnecessary war and unconstitutional war. I believe that the illuminati runs the world and the only way that can be proved wrong is if Ron Paul is president
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause First, Ron Paul has the lowest support ceiling of any candidate. No one likes him. And don't you think if he's running as a Republican, Republicans should at least support him!?!?!?!?!?! Wow, you seriously are a conspiracy nut. The fucking illuminati? Let me guess, the Da Vinci Code is real, the government shot JFK and caused 911, and we never went to the moon. Am I in your general realm of logic? I mean holy shit how can you be this stupid when it comes to reality???
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 No one likes Ron Paul? Is that why I see Ron Paul supporters all over my county? I have yet to see any other supporter from any other candidate. Ron Paul has the most dedicated supporters and frankly, no one likes Romney. Everyone is looking for an anti-Romney and the only reason Romney is the front runner is because he has been campaigning for almost 20 years and he buys peoples votes with his millions of dollars.
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Oh and by the way, the former chief of the Osama Bin Laden tracking unit of the counterterrorism center of the CIA endorsed Ron Paul. Romney=More endless wars that bankrupt America and ultimately ends the US. I don't understand why people like you hate peace and trade? You think dropping bombs on people makes them like you? If you do, then you are an idiot. Let's see who benefits from war....oh, maybe the military industrial complex?
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Paul= More attacks on the U.S. that leads to more deaths, more destruction, and the end of us. I don't understand why people like you hate this country and love the people who swear to destroy it. Do you think letting them attack us with no action on our part or evacuating our bases will make them stop attacking us or hating us? I already know you're an conspiracy theorist dumbass. Let's see who benefits from our destruction...oh, maybe NO ONE BUT OUR ENEMIES!?!
RoosterCogburn1008 1 month ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 So dropping bombs on people will make them respect us and like us? That's one twisted philosophy. 9/11 happened because of our interventionism so another attack like that would happen under a Romney presidency. Ron Paul wants to create friendships and peace and that is dangerous? Spending trillions and wasting valuable resources and wasting human life on endless wars. I see the US coming to the same ending as the Soviets.
SuperMeatsause 1 month ago
@SuperMeatsause I've already responded to all of this in previous comments. Its like you don't even realize we're at war.
RoosterCogburn1008 1 month ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Who benefits from war really? Our national security gets downgraded because we create more enemies, our economy gets downgraded because of the financial toll,and Americans are killed (usually minorities, not the rich white guys in the white house). The only ones that benefit are the military industrial complex and corporations. If you think the war is justified, why don't you enlist? Is your security REALLY at risk? If it is, fight for it you pansy.
SuperMeatsause 1 month ago
@SuperMeatsause First, we're at war. They're already our enemies, whether you admit it or not. War costs money, that's what war is. If we stop fighting, that doesn't mean they'll stop fighting. I'm sorry if you can't realize that they don't want peace. Yes, Americans are killed and that's tragic. But even more will die if we sit back, and allow our shores to be attacked and our civilians killed. Wow, attacking the rich, you're cool. Hows the occupy movement going?
RoosterCogburn1008 1 month ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 So they don't want peace? How can you ever win a war when neither side surrenders and signs a peace treaty? They don't hate America because it is free and prosperous, if they did, why don't they attack Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland? The ONLY ones who benefit from these endless wars are the military industrial complex. They make billions in profits while American lives are wasted and countless bombs are dropped.
SuperMeatsause 1 month ago
@SuperMeatsause And really, you're calling me a pansy? Get a life, you fucked up, conspiracy reading, legalize crack, Paulbot. Stop listening to everything spouted by Paul, and actually look into facts and history.
RoosterCogburn1008 1 month ago
@SuperMeatsause one of the most conservative states for over a decade disproves all allegations of liberalism. Newt and his affairs? Frankly, I don't support Newt. But the fact that 2/3 of these allegations dealt with social issues and not major ones also says something. The impressionable music to hit people on a subconscious level was a good touch. Plus I saw several clips of Paul where I know the response to the person he's talking to beats his argument, but they were completely cut out.
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause And the fact that you say I'm not a true American, when you say a part of you hates America, just shows your hypocracy and uneducated thoughts on these matters. I am an American who whats this country to succeed and be the best in the world. I support low taxes, small government, working with fellow Americans, and a strong national defense. You just support the end of America. Ron Paul will never win. You better find a new conspiracy theory to latch on too.
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Obama is going to beat Romney if he is the nominee. There is no way I would vote for him. Half of Ron Paul supporters would vote for Obama or just not vote at all. Any white guy can be like Romney. All he does is go up to a podium and say, "America is the greatest nation in the history of the world" and he becomes the frontrunner. The ONLY candidate that can beat Obama is Ron Paul. Mitt Romney will bring the country down.
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Do you read what you type? First, doesn't that prove that Ron Paul is just as, if not more liberal that Obama!?! Paul is not a conservative. And I have a question: are you an Obama supporter? Second, what does being white have to do with it? And Ron Paul is probably the only candidate that can't beat Obama. The GOP base doesn't support him whatsoever, and the Democrats will rally around Obama. Obama would beat Ron Paul in one of the biggest landslides in history.
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Ron Paul isn't a conservative? He preaches small government and less taxes/regulations. He never voted for a tax increase and he never voted for anything that was unconstitutional. Hmm, So Romney can beat Obama? So Obama and Romney both supported the bank bailouts....ooh they have something in common! Obama can criticize Romney ALL DAY! Ron Paul leads a revolution and can't win but Romney who wins the moron vote, can? Sure......
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Yes, Ron Paul is not a conservative. Hell, he's left of Obama on many issues! Ron Paul, in 20 years in the House, has gotten one bill passed. Ya, great record....Yes, Romney, like most candidates, could beat Obama. Oh my god! You found a similarity between two candidates of opposing parties!? You're a fucking genius!! Seriously, get a life. What would Obama criticize Romney on? And if you're calling American voters morons, well, that's a pretty shitty view. Paul can't win.
RoosterCogburn1008 1 month ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Romney definitely wins the moron vote. Look at Paul's support: college students. Of course Ron Paul can't beat Romney when he gets a constant stream of money from Goldman Sachs and has an infinite supply of cash to campaign for the rest of his life. Most Americans are brain washed and fall to propaganda and war is all of a sudden the norm. I don't know of any other country that has participated in more wars than the U.S. Is that what we stand for?
SuperMeatsause 1 month ago
@SuperMeatsause "The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home." - James Madison / If you really think that the most powerful nation on earth is at all in danger from any other country (especially one that is weak), then you are completely RETARDED. If this country ever comes down, it will probably be due to economic reasons, and not because of a lack of defense. Romney=Dropping bombs......Dropping bombs=weaker defense
SuperMeatsause 1 month ago
@SuperMeatsause Do you know what nuclear weapons are? I'm talking about the leveling of an American city. Gone, off the map. No country with nuclear weapons can be considered weak, dumbass. I'm not saying a nuclear terrorist strike will end the country, I'm just saying it will possibly kill hundreds of millions of people. Now, I don't want that to happen. Yet you seem to be in favor of every insane dictator with a hate towards humanity have the most powerful weapon in history. Are you retarded?
RoosterCogburn1008 1 month ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 No nation on Earth should have a nuclear weapon. Iran knows the might of America and Israel and they knows they would can obliterated within hours. You're being fooled by war propaganda. Maybe if you showed some respect to the leaders around the world that hate us, they wouldn't hate us! Ron Paul's philosophy: turn an enemy into an ally. So bombing Iran will make them like us? Thank you America for bombing us, we love you now...
SuperMeatsause 1 month ago
@SuperMeatsause Nice to see you have such respect for you're countrymen. I mean, it just amazes me so much that people like you can hold such hatred for the U.S. Yes, college students: some of the most liberal people in the country. Then have you ever heard of a country other than the U.S.? Britain, Rome, I'm sure a lot of African countries, France, China is probably up there, German region, etc. History is a long time filled with literally hundreds of thousands of wars, most not within the last
RoosterCogburn1008 1 month ago
@SuperMeatsause 200 years. The U.S. stands for freedom, conservatism, capitalism, and the greatest things in the world. Although you probably just see it as evil. Question: Why do you live here?
RoosterCogburn1008 1 month ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Romney's version of America is pretty evil. Put it this way, if the founding fathers were alive today, without any doubt, they would unanimously elect Ron Paul as president.
SuperMeatsause 1 month ago
@SuperMeatsause You are just falling to conspiracy theories. Yes, they did; a lot. The fact you think Iran would "invade us" proves that you don't know wtf foreign policy is. Iran would attack us. Not send an army across the ocean and capture Washington in a siege. They would use nuclear terrorism, and other forms of underhanded warfare. They are at war with us. Why do you want to trade with people who are at war with us? Paul's foreign policy would just lead to death.
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause The Iraq War was completely justified. Our intelligence, along with most intelligence of other countries, said he had WMDs. Not to mention he wouldn't let inspectors look. He constantly broke UN resolutions, he financially supported terrorists, he allowed terrorists to hide in his country, and since the Gulf War ended in a ceasefire without a treaty, we had the legal right to restart fighting whenever. Not to mention when we invaded we found he had enough anthrax to kill millions
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Iraq never had WMD's, Saddam was never linked to Al-Qaeda, and Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11. If Saddam was such a bad guy, why did we support him before the Gulf War? We give him money and we rose him to power. It's something called propaganda. And you sir fall for it very easily.
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause First, yes Saddam did, look it up. Saddam has been linked to Al-Qaeda, and plus its a War on TERROR. That means all terrorist groups, people/countries who fund terrorist groups, and people/countries that hide terrorist groups. Its hard to argue this point with you just because you have what seems no knowledge on the subject. We did not put him in power, and we only used him against Iran, a bigger enemy. Its something called logic and planning. And you sir have none of it.
RoosterCogburn1008 2 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 If the president wanted to go to war with Pakistan tomorrow, we would. There is absolutely no hesitation to allow thousands of our soldiers to die, trillions of dollars to put us in debt, and the killing of American values. The government can create any propaganda as they choose and people like you fall for it. With leaders like Romney, the only thing America is known for is: WAR. Let's bomb the hell out of every person that disagrees with us!!!
SuperMeatsause 2 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Why the fuck would we go to war with Pakistan right now? You libertarians never understand that we go to war FOR A REASON! Its not "Oh, I'm bored. Let's bomb Argentina." No. You would allow people who want to kill us to get weapons for which to kill us, then allow us to get killed? Ya, you're really saving lives there. There is no doubt in my mind that another 9/11 would happen under a Paul Presidency.
RoosterCogburn1008 1 month ago
@SuperMeatsause Iraq or Afghanistan? And you're a libertarian, and I'm the retard? Jesus, when will you people learn that APPEASEMENT DOESN'T WORK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Let me guess, Hitler deserved Poland, right?
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 Appeasement works sometimes....just because it didn't work in world war 2 doesn't mean it doesn't always work. Hitler was greedy and wanted to control the world but Al-Qaeda doesn't want to take over the world. Terrorists barely have any power and Ron Paul's philosophy is that if you make friends, you won't have enemies. It's as simple as that. If we do EVERYTHING we can to be friends and they reject and start killing us again, then by all means, it's war.
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause And there it is. The linchpin of your stupidity, and illogical thinking. Negotiation with terrorists. You're really fucked up in the mind, you know that?
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause realize that. And wasn't it Jefferson who called for an Empire of Liberty? And who fully supported the War of 1812 and the Barbary Wars? Get a clue and stop believing in Socialist utopias.
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Just now saw this comment. Explain how 999 will become 30-30-30. Its basically impossible. And you put in another comment on how we should raise taxes on corporations. Do you just hate America, or do you believe in Socialism? Either way you're pretty liberal if you think we should tax businesses even harder. And Ron Paul would never garner more than 20% in a national election. And only 10% of those people would genuinely support him.
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 The only thing good about Herman Cain's 9-9-9 plan is the 9% corporate income tax which will probably generate some jobs but the rest of the plan seems like it is a plan for the rich. Lowering income taxes for the rich, raising taxes on the middle class, and raising taxes on goods? I don't understand that. Plus, under Herman Cain, debt will continue to rise because he will keep giving aid and starting more wars. Ron Paul's main concern is not taxes, it is creating prosperity.
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Hard to have prosperity when we're all dead. Cain would bring in the necessary cuts, but not from the military, which if anything should be increased, not slashed apart like in Paul's plan. Who do you think makes jobs? The rich. And it doesn't raise taxes on the middle class. Google the 999 calculator, and you'll see how cheaper things would be under his plan. Have you even read the plan?
RoosterCogburn1008 3 months ago
@RoosterCogburn1008 The rich don't create jobs, businesses and corporations do, there is a difference. Where else can you cut besides the military? Oh, I know! How about education and healthcare !Let's keep feeding the military and downgrading our national security. I don't get how you think that the road to peace is through aggression and war. There is no military threat to the U.S. Iran will never even think about nuking anyone because they know they will lose!
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
RON PAUL!!! ((END THE FED_END THE WAR_END THE IRS)) RON PAUL!!!!
dotdotlot 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012
zuzupetals1999 5 months ago
Uncle Tom Cain for Prez!
TheDrCynic 5 months ago
Herman Cain would be an awesome President. It pisses me off that people are saying he should be on a ticket with that loon, Ron Paul....
RoosterCogburn1008 5 months ago
We need this man. I will be praying....
Brad2070 5 months ago
we dont do number 2...(never mind) Really seriously...I really like this guy! Herman Cain just may be a great president if elected
Tilleyass 5 months ago
we dont do number 2...(never mind)
Tilleyass 5 months ago
didn't mean that to be rude, btw he destroyed santorum in a debate where santorum explained the history of libya in a book he wrote, and ron paul corrected him and destroyed his chances of book sales. just look for ron paul destroys santorum lol
mojorisingist 5 months ago
People stop trolling! No one is perfect, but Cain is the closest thing to it!
scoutgls1 6 months ago
obama cant even read a speach without a teleprompter. you democrats seem to foget that obama is a socialist. he's in this for himself, not for us as a country. as an independant, my vote goes to herman cain. he's a true leader, a true American, whos proven he knows how to raise money and lead people. he gives hope to us all. Obama's time is over. stop lying to yourselves and learn about ALL of the canidates. Learn for yourself and make a decision for the whole country. Vote Herman Cain 2012!
cjb724 7 months ago
He used to be a chairman for the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City! He's a fraud! Vote Ron Paul 2012!!!
humanvegetable 7 months ago
@humanvegetable NEVERRRRRRRR!!!!!!!
DontFriendInviteMe 5 months ago in playlist Herman Cain's Greatest Hits
This has been flagged as spam show
All GOP, TEA & DEM Love to Spend TRILLIONS on Continuing the Useless Wars & Occupations, and on Corporate Subsidies (Oil, Farm, etc.), and on Corporate Welfare (Wall-Street), and on Tax Cuts for the Rich, and on Israel (Endless Aid & Weapons for Israel every year), and on Pentagon (Trillions of Pentagon dollars Missing), and on 1500 Military Bases USA's Failing Empire has ALL OVER Earth. DEMS & GOP'S SPEND 24/7.
Government Prints Money (makes them worthless) and takes TRILLIONS in Chinese Loans
halcyon0830 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DEMOCRATloyalty
FUCK OBAMA TO HELL. FUCK HERMAN CAIN TO HELL. FUCK REPUBLICANS TO HELL. FUCK DEMOCRATS TO HELL. NOONE GIVES A SHIT ABOUT YOU.
halcyon0830 7 months ago
People we need to "Like" comments that are brave and true, do not be shy. we need to encourage comments that are well..against herman cains lies. we need to "Dislike" comments based on racism and lies no matter which politician they support. we need to reply to comments based on fear and ensure them they will be alright if they research and vote for Ron Paul.
mojorisingist 7 months ago
@mojorisingist It's when people research Ron Paul that they get turned away from his policies. He's great when it comes to finances and the fed, but his foreign policy is worse than a kindergarteners. He is an absolute idiot when it comes to Islamic history and for that he will never in this lifetime become the president. Never.
DontFriendInviteMe 5 months ago in playlist Herman Cain's Greatest Hits
@DontFriendInviteMe so what about islamic history is he an idiot about. it seems to me he is the most well informed and understanding of their history than any other candidate. perhaps it is you who is misinformed. i suggest talking with somone in iran or isreal or libya or whatever islam country. its very easy with facebook, skype, or emails now. i'm betting that they are most likely to like ron pauls foreighn polocy and be more willing than you to have peace.
mojorisingist 5 months ago
@mojorisingist Riiiight .. I've studied it for 20 years, I was married to a muslim for 10 yrs, I've lived in TWO muslim countries, & biblical history is one of my favorite subjects, but dumbass Ron Paul knows more about it than me. You shove your head deeper up his ass so you don't have to see anybody else's thoughts but his. He wont win, you watch. You might fake how many of you are online, but you can't increase your numbers at the voting booth. You don't even know what the crusades were about
DontFriendInviteMe 5 months ago
@mojorisingist by the way ... my ex WAS IRANIAN! So shove it you arrogant, closed minded, RonPaulbot pig. I only disagreed with half of Ron Paul's ideas at the beginning of this year, because of you fucking assholes all over the internet, now I fucking hate him with all of my being, and I never want to see his face or hear his name again. You've turned half of America against him because you are suck fucking assholes!
DontFriendInviteMe 5 months ago
@DontFriendInviteMe wow i walked right into that one. if i were you i'de get over it and rely on your own research and discernment rather than others. you dont seem to be good with dealing with most americans.
mojorisingist 5 months ago