Freeman in Court Audio Subtitle 15 Oct

[321billygoat]

Here is a perfect example of how their is total and blatent disregard for common law this man a human being is wrongly accused and he states clearly in court that he does not contract with the court but the judge continues this is a perfect example of the Nazi state in action and if you dont fight against this tyranny you will be the next one in court or perhaps the gas chambers as they said they want to kill off 50% of the population

[Joebhoy1888able]

Did this get thrown out?

[roberts1711]

So im right in assuming you spent time in jail because you tried out your FOTL stuff? Strikes me that a normal person who sits on the grass would not spend any time in jail. Looks like your FMOTL mumbo jumbo just got you into extra trouble lol.

[katoness]

@roberts1711 normal people sitting on the grass in the first place, should not have to pay fines of 300 pounds. Sounds like your full of mumbo jumbo.

[lblmer]

A better course would be to ask questions, as Mr. Menard advises, so as to learn. Can I see your oath of office? Right away up front. Do you have jusrisdiction over me a live natural human being?

[crisisofconsciousnes]

So if the judge addresses you as mr, and you respond, have you not accepted the contract? which is what he did? How can you avoid the Judge just carrying on, You cant exactly ignore him can you, do you keep correcting him?

[jenleex]

What is strenge about this is that the judge NEVER HAD JURISDITION, so there is NO contempt of court and the guy does not have to apologise to anyone and should start proseedings against the judge. but he did well, keep it up..

[str8out]

Sorry I'm too stupid to understand 4:08 Can somebody explain, I'm a dummy.

[thegreatfish]

@b0rg51r Can't I do both?

Seriously though, if I were trying to find you in a crowded room, how do you think I'd do that? I'd say, "Kevin?". And when Kevin says "are you addressing me?", what do you think I'm going to say? Obviously, I'm going to say "Are you Kevin?". And when he says Yes (allegedly), what do you think I'm going to call him for the rest of the conversation? Kevin! I'm just trying to talk to him like a normal person would. The lack of common sense here is ridiculous.

[thegreatfish]

Dude, he just wanted to know your name. He moved your case to the end because he knew you were going to take up everybody's time. Face it, you are a layman.

[hargohargo]

thanks for uploading this, im tired of all the shitebages who automatically think the cops are right in everything they do and think that all the working class lads are scumbags, its an irish mental disorder that after so many revelations about the irish police people still have unshakeable faith in this organization. i have spoken to people from working class areas people who are law abiding citizens but because they happen to be poor and answered the police back recieved savage beatings.

[soulrosesone]

I would like to ask those who are interested in sharing and communicating with others who want to speed this up by doing all we can do to talk about what we know, regardless of the reception.....to join my group. We're all in this together :-) Facebook group: Free yourself...don't comply with the corporate CONtracts. :-)

[louthleviathan]

@themouthsoap well said.

Peace

[vme02]

Why do people show up to a private place of business? When the charges were read he should have said he does not understand, and start to ask questions, of which there should be a great host of them. Anyway, nice try guys, its a learning process so stick with it.

[yakidou]

The birth certificate is not personnal identification. Question: Judge why are you using the name Kevin or birth certificate as personal identification? Under what authority? You are the only one who can consent to be recognize as the name on Birth certificate. Wake up Freeman it is so easy to win in court just stand on the point: Why are you using the name Kevin blabla as personal identification? Then he can only dismissed the case....

[brygenon]

I love how the judge doesn't let himself get baited into discussing the Freeman's legal theories. "I am no longer in a position, being a judge, to advise you. The function of advice in matters coming before the Court is that of solicitors and barristers."

[edtheball69]

I had a go in court got threatend and told I had no audience with the court check my channel.

[Finnbar01]

Ok, I don't get this part. When the Judge headed off to his chambers, the freeman was leaving court and a solicitor advised him not to. Yet the vid says never take the advice of a solicitor but the freeman re-enters the court???

[ashleelmb]

@Finnbar01: exactly...that confused me too...so putting it in laymans terms (so to speak), he actually listened to the solicitor by going back into the court even though the author of the video says its not wise to take the solicitors advice. Confused me a bit too

[bolabus]

dumber than a donut

[donvit2]

good riddance. thanks for wasting the tax payers time.

[babapoopoo]

＠０３：１５ when the judge leaves you have to stay in the berth? and wait 'till judge comes back? he's trying to fool you into "giving up" the battle? ...plz answer me.. ty

[lonecrow66]

This is PRICELESS.

[gerh54]

€300 for not doing what was lawfully required of you!! Have you learnt anything from this? I doubt it because you oppose all authority and have no respect for Laws or values!!

[jessieok]

What was the outcome of this case on the 29th of october, or in total if not heard on the 29th??????????? INTREAGUED, Cheers well done 10**********

[eyeswideopen1111]

@jessieok ya can read the rest + the paperwork involved by clicking the first link in the description.

[blackyukon2001]

Right there at 6:26 you entered into a contract!

When the judge said "Mr if you insist on answering me back I will hold you in contempt of court" then you answered him back.

that tricky cock sucking cum swallowing judge.

[Craan23]

I wasn't there when the incident that led to this court case happened but if you were falsely arrested Freeman then your defense is admirable. What kind of a fuckin Poultas would ream off lines from a public order act with no justification for doing so? If a facist government became fully realised in this country these are the tools that they use to police their own people. Useful idiots.

[bigcreator]

what happend next?

[HighlandFreePress]

Well done.

Folks, Google "Freeman on the Land"

[Polkaten]

What a great way to waste court time. You were in court because you broke the law.

[darksettler]

@Polkaten he actually broke policy, not the law

[Polkaten]

Really? What policy.

[giddygiddy85]

@Polkaten look up the video freeman kidnapped and you'll see yourself what this 'criminal' done

[Polkaten]

It sounds like he was breaking a by law and refused to move on so whats your point? He should decide himself what laws apply to him?

[freestatereport]

only natural laws count. all other are just words on paper that a bunch of strangers wrote down.

[freedomisntpolitical]

Ah, nice & simple... I dont suppose you thought there is something more to this than meets the eye. Have you bothered to find out which law he broke, if any. Clearly he denies breaking the law. So, really what has happened here is the court has wasted this mans free time.

[Polkaten]

Perfect sense, a man in court denies breaking the law so therefore the court is at fault. What a great legal mind you have.

[freedomisntpolitical]

Again, nice and simple. You refuse to look into things so don't bother replying to me, your a waste of time.

[Polkaten]

Thats not an argument chap.

[MaikUniversum]

@Polkaten the law is based on constitution. Man didn't sign a constitution, therefore he didn't break anything. Law is imaginary.

[antoconno]

Brilliant. Judge sounded like he stuttered his way through. Hope it all goes well for you my friend.

[kdcruz75]

the thugs in the TEMPLE in London will be forced to move the Creators' vessel forward instead of in reverse gear as they have done so far for their own PARTY or PARTIES that they hide behind in parliament and legislative assemblies across the world...AT OUR OWN EXPENSE .

using our CREDIT and now will be using our FAITH (in Jesus Christ ) to settle the debt.

with the full FAITH and CREDIT we will force these servants to run things the way they should be run

utube: DISCHARGE DEBTS THRU A4V

[kdcruz75]

as an interested third party i plead the blood covenant of jesus Christ ...

instruct the bench to settle the account

accept for value

and all debts have been forgiven

case is settled

i think this will be worth a try

[updara1989]

i'm goin to read my rights and i'm goin to do something similar to this cause i'm up in court in january for doing nothing

[Polkaten]

Whats nothing? Is that in a metaphysical sense?

[Danster82]

perfect until the last sentence

"so im free to go yeah?"

"can I go play now Dad?"

[eyeswideopen1111]

Hi danster,

unfortunatley as it's just audio you cannot see the reaction of the judge at this point.

Now was I asking him permission as u assume? or was I offering him a contract? Matter - of which a meeting of the minds can be struck.

If he did not answer at this point we would be in agreement - that's why he snapped.

[Danster82]

That was a bit sharp of me, dont get me wrong in total support of you and Love what youve done.

[kdcruz75]

purge : to clear sin (debt)

u created a liability for the bank ..

u offered to settle the liability by offering in defense by speech (apology) that u did not intend to commit the act...

he accepted and in consideration he balanced the books by writing off the liability

[kdcruz75]

as mr so and so : the person ..entity created by the government u have to discharge the liability created by violation of the act...as a person u stand surety for the debtor

therefore guilty or not guilty ( are u gonna discharge or not)

but before somehow if u enter into the record that u are the creditor u have another choice (as beneficiary to the trust set up at birth)

u get to instruct the banker to set off any liabilities

so ..................

[kdcruz75]

u plead the blood covenant of Jesus Christ..

and enter it into record..

this shows that all ur debts are prepaid ..it is an instruction to set off ..

i think the REGIS (roman emperor ) tration process is about the vicar of christ (the pope..in place of christ) holding all titles as trustee till the return of the messiah.

[kdcruz75]

his agents(templar bankers) have beendelegated this job to settle all sins/debts with the blood covenant (all debts have been forgiven)

as beneficiaries we remind them of their obligation as trustees and instruct them to set off the debt

otherwise these satanists will drown us in debt with their deception and force us to discharge the sin/debt and postpone the balancing of books

even the satanists are under the creator's rule and that is why they hate HIM

Jesus forced them into a new covenant

[bavwill]

@Danster82 I'd interpret" So I'm free to go, yeah?" as a statement followed by the question tag, "yeah", thereby stating that he is free to go and simply being courteous by asking the judge if he was okay with it. ;-}

[bobwaits]

Oh my God....ye are all a bunch of mentalists.

[youniverse9]

Wow...

[iRobber7]

That was great. Well done.

What happened on the 29th???

[jaffijaffer]

you should have started by 1, challenging the juristiction of the court as they did not provide proof that you gave consent to be without a jury. 2, claiming common law juristiction. " i will address you as i see fit in my court?", " what does your court have to do with me and why are you not there now?"

[marshallone]

The judge said "NOT WITH STANDING!" He told you he did not have standing, you need to listen to what he said! The second you began to answer to the MISTER and respond, he had you. I only address statements to the RECORD, not the JUDGE. You address him with any statement and you are contracting with HIM. Only ask questions to the judge and make statements to the RECORD. God bless, peace to you!

[marshallone]

YOU HAD THEM! You could have just said, "Let the record reflect the Judge has left the court to the MAN, standing on dry land and this case is OVER." And walked OUT! Staying there and talking was your only then answering when the MISTER was given. You could have asked, "On and for the RECORD, who are you addressing?" Or, "On and for the record, Identify the MISTER you are addressing, because ITS NOT ME!"

[jaffijaffer]

couldnt have done a better job myself, rockin

[TheOriginalJoeBloggs]

How did it go today??

[OptimusSledge]

Yeah, come on! Surely the magic words got the guy off scot free?

[TheOriginalJoeBloggs]

OR maybe not

[OptimusSledge]

It MUST have worked. All these lunat- people can't be wrong, can they?

[TheOriginalJoeBloggs]

What makes you say it MUST have worked, what MAKES you say that??

[sigmoid6]

didn't properly establish standing, judge held him in contempt for "stating" he is not a legal entity (ie. "Mr....") he didn't follow thru. All he had to do was put it in the form of a question.... i.e "excuse me are you addressing me as Mr. ?, are you enticing me into being a legal entity?"

That would kill it right there... (criminal offense - enticement into slavery) Judge kept calling him Mr. and he didn't object "properly" "you saying I can't ask questions?" WHAM! speak in questions!

[Easydollars]

I agree. Standing wasnt established firmly. In my opinion why front up in a commercial court of law at all. Just file your stuff into the court records along with the Birth Certificate. I think he should have said I claim common law jusridication, and I waive all rights and do not consent.

[sigmoid6]

He didn't properly establish who he was, yes the judge can hold him in contempt for "stating" he is not a legal entity (ie. "Mr....") but he didn't follow thru. All he had to do was put it in the form of a question.... i.e "excuse me are you addressing me as Mr. ?, are you enticing me into be considered a legal entity?"

That would kill it right there... (criminal offense - enticement into slavery)

[townsendjim]

in camera means in chambers....

courts run on 'assumption' which is a legal atrocity. an assumption stands in court unless specifically negatively averred. you could prepare an affadavit of specific negative averral.

if asked to plea you may state that you are lawfully presumed innocent so there is no lawful need to plea.

always question jurisdiction... and remember to fight your battle in the court of public opinion as these criminal lawyers do.

[bobbyinedmonton]

wOOt wOOt

Humanity is getting closer and closer to freedom!

[jonprince100]

LMAO! The judge should have remanded him in custody. Maybe his smart arse would have a different reaction after it had been subjected to a couple of weeks in prison. Shame he couldn't.

What was the man arrested for? Was it a crime or an offence?

[pijjin]

If you knew what you were talking about princejon of the Century, then you would know he was arrested for sitting on the grass, which is not a crime, and the Judge could not jail him because the Judge has no right to.

Maybe his 'smart arse' was smarter than the legal eagles eh? . The police swear an oath to uphold common law, not statute law, but then the powers that think they be rely on the ignorant to carry on with their intimidating autocratic behaviour. ;)

[aiyic]

the Judge couldn't remand him, and that is the point of this video - to pull the wool back from your eyes.

Courts exist through freeman ignorance.

[jonprince100]

Not from my eyes mate!

It's you that's living in cloud cuckoo land. Do you think that one stupid person making himself look like a complete idiot will make the system change??!! If so then it's your eyes that have wool over them!

[jessieok]

I ONLY SEE 1 IDIOT HERE!!!!!! jonprince:)

and it's you,,,,, none so blind as those that do not want to see.

[OneManAndHisFiction]

Bill Thornton has successfully challenged court jurisdiction such that case could not be established. You are then free to go.

Check out his material and audio seminars on: 1215 org

There's a lot there to study. - First know the difference between a "court of record" (a court proceeding according to the common law) and a Nisi Prius Court (by contract / agreement / consent).

Establish your standing as one of the People (a real human being) then make a claim / counterclaim to challenge juris.

[syndrah]

pwnd.

[netlethe]

Wonderful .. stick it too them you all ..

Peace.

[kingneddy]

this stuff is animal!!!!!

[kingneddy]

power to the freeman!

[mark191416]

Youre all rock n roll superstar dj's

[mcattack21]

Can I not plead innocent , Judge : eh uh eh uh

HAHAHA Best video on youtube!!

[freemanshrout]

Thanks for this exciting video .. hope there are better recordings on the 29th .. nervously looking forward to it, sat here on the edge of my chair ..

All power to you Freeman Kevin 8~))

[mark191416]

I think the Judge knows hes an actor when he said always a bit of drama in the district court, thats why its all theatre, until of course a free man turns up and gives him a dose of real life.

[outofbubblegum]

If this man had commited a crime he would heve been put in Jail. The "judge" failled to get anything to stick so he remanded it again to have another bash..... there is no contract or crime here (at least not from the Free Man)

[hazmx5]

EXCELLENT WELL DONE MATE !

[theemurf]

Exactly this is court over a barrel. No authority but that which we grant. If this freeman thing was bullshit they'd have had the chap down €300 or in jail, but they didn't because they haven't got authority over men and women. Only persons.

[mark191416]

Well done! brilliant.

[odltirigu]

That was magic! Fair play. You have nerves of steel, I give you that. You have lots of support too; keep fighting the good fight of knowledge and truth. Stay free

[TheOriginalJoeBloggs]

Good luck for the 29th! In contempt

watch?v=76ZEBq66gzg

watch?v=gf5ZrUVL0gU

watch?v=iTpnL48Beqk