@Pr3dProductionsHD the instability will give it extremely high maneuverability when coupled with the fly by wire and thrust vectoring. this also drastically decreases drag and RCS.
for the sceptics, you can achieve every air manoeuvre except for yaw with just two ailerons and you can achieve any flight path without yaw. its makes sense on many levels to do away with redundant hinged surfaces.
@aarrmmeenndd100 Tell me one bad REAL reason to building a unmanned/maned stealth fighter jet. Not trying to be a dick but come on this is badass. You know what ever country your from we're gonna share with you. :)
@aarrmmeenndd100 their will never only be unmanned fighters, imagine your entire air-force using unmanned drones, imagine your enemy hacks your wireless signal to the drones and they take over your air force. they will turn your fighters against you. they could even jam the signal and make your air force useless. Streaming signals are no where near secure as communication signals that can be bounced off the atmosphere.
@aarrmmeenndd100 thats what they say, but who knows. the F-22 has such high maintenance costs, if the F/a-xx can pull threw and lower those costs while increasing stealth then im sure they will eventually replace the F-22. also having more of the same aircraft reduces the cost of spare parts.
Please, the USA can't even afford a McDonald's happy meal anymore. Let alone, building 6th gen A/C. Shit, they can't even afford 5th gen. Due to 4 illegal wars and 200+ bases world wide, the USA is financially, and therefore militarily broken. She's a former superpower, now resigned to the scrapheap. No one gives a rats ass about the USA anymore, cause as the American's say, 'nobody likes a loser'. Now the USA is broken, and a geographical nobody - world peace is imminent.
@w0y1z92753 Your a fuckin retard and don't be mad cause we still dominate. Shows how much you know, we just built a $50 billion dollar UAV and it didnt affect us much. Where are you from? The UK? I bet you saw this and got pissed that even though we're in a dept problem we still make better plane.
@BarrettMasada Dominate what, exactly? The USA has NEVER won a war in which it was not allied to Russia at the time. Fact. Korea - Lost, NAM - Lost, Gulf war 1 - Russia part of the coalition. War on Terror - Lost. Daily stone throwing insurgents own US troops. In ten years you've achived jack shit, except making your own constitution null and void Re: TSA's right to assfinger your kids, Patriot acts 1&2, Telecommunications act etc... Translate; win for the terrorists.
@w0y1z92753 Hahaha your just a typical anit-american who is from what i see jealous. We've never lost a war, Vietnam, wasnt lost we withdrew. Same as Korean. We pushed them all the way back to the northern half of there country. And War on terror lost? Ha your not that bright huh? How did we lose that? If it was a war on terror we dominated we killed 100x more then they killed us and we killed most their leaders. Your country what ever it may be is shit compared to us.
@w0y1z92753 And daily stone that wanna be news website? I couldnt even understand what you were trying to say about that. Now watch this video and cry about how we still are supreme in military might.
@BarrettMasada You understood perfectly. Your response demonstrates clearly that you're butt hurt about the USA being a has been. Nothing wrong with that, though its kinda pathetic when kids try to hang on to the past, when they were never a part of it to begin with. ROFL.
@w0y1z92753 Actual its very much the opposite. Your just some homo probably from the UK, typical, thinking that "the US is falling" but then you saw this and shit your pants and cried. Because you just found proof the US is still superior in military strength. And pretty much everything else. I try to be nicer to foreign people but all they do is talk shit about the US because we're better. Your in denial, acceptance is the first road to recovery.
@BarrettMasada - Nope the US is broke. Flat broke. If a war broke out tomorrow you wouldn't be able to fight it. The USD is worthless, literally. Just ask Ben Bernanke. Plus the US has an obesity problem -70% of USA is now Obese. Your country has been de industrialised. All your goods now come from China, India and South America. BTW I'm not from the UK (thank god). I'm not talking shit on the US either, just stating facts. You're broke and addicted to supersized mcdonalds meals.
@w0y1z92753 Wow just wow. You really are that dumb. 70% you sure are good at making up numbers, and If the war broke out tomorrow everyone would coming running to us. You know why? Because we have the best troops and military equipment. If we're so deindustrialized then how come we have some of the most rich and powerful companies? Including Apple, Walmart, and even McDonalds a company that Is in almost every country. And a McDonalds jokes? You are a typical foreign faggot.
@BarrettMasada Nice companies you listed as your biggest - Walmart, McDonalds - Both sell fast food, both produce nothing. I didn't realise you thought places like McD's and Walmart produce shit. And you're calling me stupid? Wow. BTW Walmart specializes in foreign products you know - made in China type shit?
@w0y1z92753 many things made in China even in other countries. But guess who owns those counties? We do. We're also the biggest supplier of military equipment. We also own facebook, google, and youtube. Some of the biggest companies in the world. Dont forget all of our car companies. The reason i brought up walmart is that if the 3 owners of Walmart combine their money they would have more money then any one in the world. We may be in some dept trouble but the world would crumble without us.
@w0y1z92753 many things made in China even in other countries. But guess who owns those counties? We do. We're also the biggest supplier of military equipment. We also own facebook, google, and youtube. Some of the biggest companies in the world. Dont forget all of our car companies. The reason i brought up walmart is that if the 3 owners of Walmart combine their money they would have more money then any one in the world. We may be in some dept trouble but the world would crumble without us.
@BarrettMasada Oh for cryin out loud, both of you stop fighting, both of your countries are progressing and both are making mistakes at the same time. So lets all be friends and not fight.
@w0y1z92753 Oh for cryin out loud, both of you stop fighting, both of your countries are progressing and both are making mistakes at the same time. So lets all be friends and not fight.
Well... it looks better than their X-32 proposal, but I don't see how it can be very agile. It's got the stealth, but what if it needs to dogfight... especially with the PAK FA T-50 and the J-20 stealth fighters soon to be out?
@kwmkc13 Dont compare 5th generation to 6th generation, please, there is no comparison. This is just a concept, so dont judge it. I've read that its almost invisible to the naked eye, its able to blend in with any type of background, kinda of like predator in the movies. It will be able to fire lasers and basic missiles as well. No need for high maneuverability when its invisible and can lock on target with an advanced helmet mounted display sight.
@aarrmmeenndd100 i said that because i think manned fighters will not exist for ever, i personally think some derivative of the X-45 will take manned fighters spotlight, [look up x-45 or the newer x-47, their man-less thingumagygs].
@prjerry7 their will always be manned fighters, maybe until AI are developed to fly military jets. Technology is always changing, if you had all unmanned fighters just imagine the enemy is able to jam or hack and take control of your wireless communication signal to all your fighters....... then your fucked.......
@Baseshocks if their autonomous and stealthy [thus they don't communicate, they simply do their mission [because communication renders stealth due to radar signal]] they can't be jammed or hacked.
@prjerry7 yup, thats AI, AI leads to sky net, sky net leads to nuke war that leads to kyle going back in time to save Sara, its inevitable, no one can stop judgement day. :D.
@Baseshocks I know your joking but i hope you know that AI doesn't exist how people think it does. Even humans work in a basis of instinct, we and every other animal work according to these instincts, we can not do anything outside of them.
Computers are the same. Terminator was just plain evil.
the next gen. fighter is the same $hit as 5th gen., only difference is more extensive cyberwars & i bet theill put X-48 superjet engines on them to make them go mach8 or something
@aarrmmeenndd100 Tailless aircraft have an instability issue. All modern fighter aircraft do. NASA proved you can make a stabilized fighter aircraft, and Boeing is making the tailless X-45 UCAV
Of course this is a lie, there is no such thing as the F/A-XX; in fact, your all imagining this video, this video is and was never here. Yep, this video is 0:49 seconds of nothing; thank you for your cooperation <3.
@aarrmmeenndd100 this is not a lie - its a actual boeing design, theres probably gonna be a prototype but it may not be put into production - we'll have to wait until 2025
Most likely it does not have vertical wings because it will rely on vector thrust. The X44 MANTA concept showed that thrust-only navigation provided superior agility and better fuel efficiency. I assume this would also make the jet easier to keep off radars.
The F/A-XX is a 6th Generation aircraft (Manned/Unmanned/Stealth Aircraft). The F/A-XX is the answer to response to the Russian Sukhoi PAK FA T-50 naval version.
@SilentEagles pak-fa is a 5th generation fighter,the yanks f-22 is 5th generation fighter too,so f-22 is the answer to pak-fa,heck its probly even better than pak-fa in terms of avionics,even the russians claim its less stealthy but more maneuverable than f-22,they didnt say its superior to f-22,ruskie claim its there answer to f-22,by that,f-22 is the answer to pak-fa,the f-xx is 6th generation,its yrs ahead of pak-fa n f-22,pak-fa aint that special mate,its just a russian f-22.
@fmoa stealth technology is no more, russians have radars that can now see all western stealth aircrafts. all wasted money .. cat and mouse game still being played out =ass hole leaders.
You are an idiot. Any radar can see stealth aircraft, but none of which can do it at a useful range. By the time Russians spots F-22 on their radars they'd already be long dead.
@diveplane um..all radars can detect stealth fighters you stupid,but jets that have stealth features have radar signatures the size of birds..yanks n europe also tested radars that detect stealth you shit-head,not just russia..oh n tell stupid putin that those circular engine exhaust nozzles gives off high radar n heat signatures,so american fighter armed wit 5th gen radar guided n heat-seeking missiles would have no problem raping pak-fa,oi pak-fa also have large airframe which is not stealthy.
Looks slick but is it good agility wise? I thought YF-23 was a perfect combination of stealth and aerodynamics (nice all movable tail that doesn't stick out much in comparison to F-22, F-35). This one... just flat out getting rid of the tail... Maybe flying characteristics requirements are not that high these days...
I hope this is going to be a good fighter jet for the U.S. then the F-22
legonascar18 3 days ago
This won't be a stable plane, without vertical stabilizers... although quite interesting.
Pr3dProductionsHD 3 weeks ago
@Pr3dProductionsHD the instability will give it extremely high maneuverability when coupled with the fly by wire and thrust vectoring. this also drastically decreases drag and RCS.
hotpocketpoison 5 days ago
theres gonna be folding surfaces for yaw
TheXXFLIGHTXX 1 month ago
for the sceptics, you can achieve every air manoeuvre except for yaw with just two ailerons and you can achieve any flight path without yaw. its makes sense on many levels to do away with redundant hinged surfaces.
ssoonn88 2 months ago
Anyone trying to downplay this jet with only having a downscaled model as information to critizie it by can just eat shit, bottom line.
Direwolf56 2 months ago
No vertical stabilizers?
MrAnarmlessman 5 months ago
@aarrmmeenndd100 its both
BarrettMasada 5 months ago
@aarrmmeenndd100 Tell me one bad REAL reason to building a unmanned/maned stealth fighter jet. Not trying to be a dick but come on this is badass. You know what ever country your from we're gonna share with you. :)
BarrettMasada 6 months ago
Comment removed
BarrettMasada 6 months ago
@aarrmmeenndd100 their will never only be unmanned fighters, imagine your entire air-force using unmanned drones, imagine your enemy hacks your wireless signal to the drones and they take over your air force. they will turn your fighters against you. they could even jam the signal and make your air force useless. Streaming signals are no where near secure as communication signals that can be bounced off the atmosphere.
Baseshocks 6 months ago
@aarrmmeenndd100 thats what they say, but who knows. the F-22 has such high maintenance costs, if the F/a-xx can pull threw and lower those costs while increasing stealth then im sure they will eventually replace the F-22. also having more of the same aircraft reduces the cost of spare parts.
Baseshocks 6 months ago
Please, the USA can't even afford a McDonald's happy meal anymore. Let alone, building 6th gen A/C. Shit, they can't even afford 5th gen. Due to 4 illegal wars and 200+ bases world wide, the USA is financially, and therefore militarily broken. She's a former superpower, now resigned to the scrapheap. No one gives a rats ass about the USA anymore, cause as the American's say, 'nobody likes a loser'. Now the USA is broken, and a geographical nobody - world peace is imminent.
w0y1z92753 6 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Your a fuckin retard and don't be mad cause we still dominate. Shows how much you know, we just built a $50 billion dollar UAV and it didnt affect us much. Where are you from? The UK? I bet you saw this and got pissed that even though we're in a dept problem we still make better plane.
BarrettMasada 5 months ago
@BarrettMasada Dominate what, exactly? The USA has NEVER won a war in which it was not allied to Russia at the time. Fact. Korea - Lost, NAM - Lost, Gulf war 1 - Russia part of the coalition. War on Terror - Lost. Daily stone throwing insurgents own US troops. In ten years you've achived jack shit, except making your own constitution null and void Re: TSA's right to assfinger your kids, Patriot acts 1&2, Telecommunications act etc... Translate; win for the terrorists.
USA dominates nothing.
w0y1z92753 5 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Hahaha your just a typical anit-american who is from what i see jealous. We've never lost a war, Vietnam, wasnt lost we withdrew. Same as Korean. We pushed them all the way back to the northern half of there country. And War on terror lost? Ha your not that bright huh? How did we lose that? If it was a war on terror we dominated we killed 100x more then they killed us and we killed most their leaders. Your country what ever it may be is shit compared to us.
BarrettMasada 5 months ago
@w0y1z92753 And daily stone that wanna be news website? I couldnt even understand what you were trying to say about that. Now watch this video and cry about how we still are supreme in military might.
BarrettMasada 5 months ago
@BarrettMasada You understood perfectly. Your response demonstrates clearly that you're butt hurt about the USA being a has been. Nothing wrong with that, though its kinda pathetic when kids try to hang on to the past, when they were never a part of it to begin with. ROFL.
w0y1z92753 5 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Actual its very much the opposite. Your just some homo probably from the UK, typical, thinking that "the US is falling" but then you saw this and shit your pants and cried. Because you just found proof the US is still superior in military strength. And pretty much everything else. I try to be nicer to foreign people but all they do is talk shit about the US because we're better. Your in denial, acceptance is the first road to recovery.
BarrettMasada 5 months ago
@BarrettMasada - Nope the US is broke. Flat broke. If a war broke out tomorrow you wouldn't be able to fight it. The USD is worthless, literally. Just ask Ben Bernanke. Plus the US has an obesity problem -70% of USA is now Obese. Your country has been de industrialised. All your goods now come from China, India and South America. BTW I'm not from the UK (thank god). I'm not talking shit on the US either, just stating facts. You're broke and addicted to supersized mcdonalds meals.
w0y1z92753 5 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Wow just wow. You really are that dumb. 70% you sure are good at making up numbers, and If the war broke out tomorrow everyone would coming running to us. You know why? Because we have the best troops and military equipment. If we're so deindustrialized then how come we have some of the most rich and powerful companies? Including Apple, Walmart, and even McDonalds a company that Is in almost every country. And a McDonalds jokes? You are a typical foreign faggot.
BarrettMasada 5 months ago
@BarrettMasada Nice companies you listed as your biggest - Walmart, McDonalds - Both sell fast food, both produce nothing. I didn't realise you thought places like McD's and Walmart produce shit. And you're calling me stupid? Wow. BTW Walmart specializes in foreign products you know - made in China type shit?
Like I said de-industrialized.
w0y1z92753 5 months ago
@w0y1z92753 many things made in China even in other countries. But guess who owns those counties? We do. We're also the biggest supplier of military equipment. We also own facebook, google, and youtube. Some of the biggest companies in the world. Dont forget all of our car companies. The reason i brought up walmart is that if the 3 owners of Walmart combine their money they would have more money then any one in the world. We may be in some dept trouble but the world would crumble without us.
BarrettMasada 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@w0y1z92753 many things made in China even in other countries. But guess who owns those counties? We do. We're also the biggest supplier of military equipment. We also own facebook, google, and youtube. Some of the biggest companies in the world. Dont forget all of our car companies. The reason i brought up walmart is that if the 3 owners of Walmart combine their money they would have more money then any one in the world. We may be in some dept trouble but the world would crumble without us.
BarrettMasada 5 months ago
Comment removed
superfawful65 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BarrettMasada If it wasn't for 'foreign faggots' from the UK, America wouldn't exist. :)
superfawful65 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BarrettMasada Oh for cryin out loud, both of you stop fighting, both of your countries are progressing and both are making mistakes at the same time. So lets all be friends and not fight.
F22raptor46 5 days ago
@w0y1z92753 Oh for cryin out loud, both of you stop fighting, both of your countries are progressing and both are making mistakes at the same time. So lets all be friends and not fight.
F22raptor46 5 days ago
Well... it looks better than their X-32 proposal, but I don't see how it can be very agile. It's got the stealth, but what if it needs to dogfight... especially with the PAK FA T-50 and the J-20 stealth fighters soon to be out?
kwmkc13 7 months ago
@kwmkc13 Dont compare 5th generation to 6th generation, please, there is no comparison. This is just a concept, so dont judge it. I've read that its almost invisible to the naked eye, its able to blend in with any type of background, kinda of like predator in the movies. It will be able to fire lasers and basic missiles as well. No need for high maneuverability when its invisible and can lock on target with an advanced helmet mounted display sight.
tonygogap 6 months ago
Something very pornographic about the camera work.
euclid901 7 months ago
@aarrmmeenndd100 i said that because i think manned fighters will not exist for ever, i personally think some derivative of the X-45 will take manned fighters spotlight, [look up x-45 or the newer x-47, their man-less thingumagygs].
prjerry7 7 months ago
@prjerry7 their will always be manned fighters, maybe until AI are developed to fly military jets. Technology is always changing, if you had all unmanned fighters just imagine the enemy is able to jam or hack and take control of your wireless communication signal to all your fighters....... then your fucked.......
Baseshocks 7 months ago
@Baseshocks if their autonomous and stealthy [thus they don't communicate, they simply do their mission [because communication renders stealth due to radar signal]] they can't be jammed or hacked.
prjerry7 6 months ago
@prjerry7 yup, thats AI, AI leads to sky net, sky net leads to nuke war that leads to kyle going back in time to save Sara, its inevitable, no one can stop judgement day. :D.
Baseshocks 6 months ago
@Baseshocks I know your joking but i hope you know that AI doesn't exist how people think it does. Even humans work in a basis of instinct, we and every other animal work according to these instincts, we can not do anything outside of them.
Computers are the same. Terminator was just plain evil.
prjerry7 6 months ago
the next gen. fighter is the same $hit as 5th gen., only difference is more extensive cyberwars & i bet theill put X-48 superjet engines on them to make them go mach8 or something
prjerry7 7 months ago
@aarrmmeenndd100 x-45
prjerry7 7 months ago
Interesting, no DSI inlet...
vukashin88 8 months ago
@aarrmmeenndd100 i hope it will be cheaper too. Cheaper, means more of this.
xy274 9 months ago
@aarrmmeenndd100 Tailless aircraft have an instability issue. All modern fighter aircraft do. NASA proved you can make a stabilized fighter aircraft, and Boeing is making the tailless X-45 UCAV
phoenox23 9 months ago
Is it supposed to be better than the F/22? anybody know?
Looks like it.
ClusiveC 9 months ago
Of course this is a lie, there is no such thing as the F/A-XX; in fact, your all imagining this video, this video is and was never here. Yep, this video is 0:49 seconds of nothing; thank you for your cooperation <3.
LystAP 10 months ago
@LystAP its a concept by Boeing you cock sucker
WickedrWil 10 months ago
@WickedrWil I see you fail to grasp my attempt at humor regarding classified information and technology.
LystAP 9 months ago
@aarrmmeenndd100 this is not a lie - its a actual boeing design, theres probably gonna be a prototype but it may not be put into production - we'll have to wait until 2025
eagleclawproduction1 10 months ago
wouldnt the big metal pole under it make it show up on rader alot?
Ruckerjd01283 11 months ago 2
Most likely it does not have vertical wings because it will rely on vector thrust. The X44 MANTA concept showed that thrust-only navigation provided superior agility and better fuel efficiency. I assume this would also make the jet easier to keep off radars.
Psychlonic 11 months ago
@aarrmmeenndd100 your right it wont XD watch?v=QeKNhyhROm8
TH7596 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@aarrmmeenndd100 lie? i supposed this UCAV is fake and a lie also LMAO watch?v=QeKNhyhROm8
TH7596 1 year ago
Comment removed
TH7596 1 year ago
I'll bet it will cost up 2.6 billion per plane and probably get axed like the f-22.
Bomyster3000 1 year ago
i think f/a-xx will be more of a 5.5 generation fighter unless we have so kind of technological breakthrough
bunny153649 1 year ago
Navy only project?
MaverickWhig 1 year ago
It wil be able to shoot down air to air targets with a laser
skydreamerXIII 1 year ago
The F/A-XX is a 6th Generation aircraft (Manned/Unmanned/Stealth Aircraft). The F/A-XX is the answer to response to the Russian Sukhoi PAK FA T-50 naval version.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
@SilentEagles pak-fa is a 5th generation fighter,the yanks f-22 is 5th generation fighter too,so f-22 is the answer to pak-fa,heck its probly even better than pak-fa in terms of avionics,even the russians claim its less stealthy but more maneuverable than f-22,they didnt say its superior to f-22,ruskie claim its there answer to f-22,by that,f-22 is the answer to pak-fa,the f-xx is 6th generation,its yrs ahead of pak-fa n f-22,pak-fa aint that special mate,its just a russian f-22.
fmoa 1 year ago
@fmoa stealth technology is no more, russians have radars that can now see all western stealth aircrafts. all wasted money .. cat and mouse game still being played out =ass hole leaders.
diveplane 1 year ago
@diveplane If thats true then why on Earth would they still say that only stealth fighter and bombers will survive future battles?
NWguy83 1 year ago
@diveplane
You are an idiot. Any radar can see stealth aircraft, but none of which can do it at a useful range. By the time Russians spots F-22 on their radars they'd already be long dead.
cr9527 1 year ago
@diveplane um..all radars can detect stealth fighters you stupid,but jets that have stealth features have radar signatures the size of birds..yanks n europe also tested radars that detect stealth you shit-head,not just russia..oh n tell stupid putin that those circular engine exhaust nozzles gives off high radar n heat signatures,so american fighter armed wit 5th gen radar guided n heat-seeking missiles would have no problem raping pak-fa,oi pak-fa also have large airframe which is not stealthy.
fmoa 1 year ago
Looks slick but is it good agility wise? I thought YF-23 was a perfect combination of stealth and aerodynamics (nice all movable tail that doesn't stick out much in comparison to F-22, F-35). This one... just flat out getting rid of the tail... Maybe flying characteristics requirements are not that high these days...
hockeyfreakboy99 1 year ago
Wow! ............. drool
admahesh 1 year ago
I LOVED IT, THANKS A LOT FOR SHARING.
pedsilpe 1 year ago
I heard about F/A-XX that is going replace F-18E/F Super Hornet 2025. The F/A-XX look like F-22 on naval version.
USAAIRPOWER 1 year ago
I wonder if this A/C will be manned, UCAV, or OPV...
dynsoar 1 year ago
@dynsoar it can be manned or ucav depending on mission requirements by the navy.
fighterace2688 1 year ago
Comment removed
dynsoar 1 year ago
The cool stuff never gets built.
zestyjujubee 1 year ago
FUCKIN BADASS!!!.....
TheJoshJman 1 year ago