Added: 2 years ago
From: Weigelfilm
Views: 293,217
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (213)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I wish Reagan was back to bring the US and Russia together again.. That was a good feeling in the 80's. Now it seems like we are right back were we started.. I hate the Russian Gov but so what. I hate the US gov too.. The people of the US and Russia are alot alike and would get along just fine together if our damn Governments would get the fuck out of the way...

  • Самолёт этот - известная фотожаба. Но сам ролик мне нравится. Какой антураж!

  • Hilarious war song :-)

  • @c3inomaha FUCK YOU GERORGE W BUSH WAS A GOOD PRESIDENT SO JUST FUCK OFF PANSY ASS FUCKING BITCH FROM HELL!!!

  • May be if you'd used Russian cyrillic's in the title....

  • omg what a fake XD

  • is that picture jumping to the rhythm or what? ;-)

  • Omg, You Russians are crazy XD Friendy greeting: Murat

  • @TheHasanMurat xD Thanks

  • Y... y... y esa cosa alguna vez despegó ?

  • Even the image is dancing kazachoc.

  • WHAT'S THE SONG? :O 

  • ok. now were seriously fucked !

  • Its gonna take more than one Stinger Missile to bring that down... :)

  • Thats it fo America now that the russians have concret plane

  • The name of the song is "Хор Красной Армии - Казачья (Red Army Choir - Cossack's song) " good luck finding it)))

  • Comment removed

  • Wonder if they were given a restriction to the number of guns they could fire in one go. Would imagine the kick.back from the cannons would either stall the plane or rip the top off.

  • that last plane was called the "Stallin" named after Stalin . . ..

  • Russia is the best in the Aerospace Industry

  • was this every used?

    

  • Not people... Horses whinnying with blinds on.. Google "firestorm dresden" if you need a example of the "accidental deaths" caused by the "allies" during WW2. There seems to be a lack of accurate knowledge circulating here.

    “History is written by the victors.”

    By Churchill himself, I believe.

  • Two bombers glued together lol crazy Russians lol

  • let me guise the test ended with the plane go right into the forest and explode

  • It was no bomber :)

  • FAKE AS YOUR MOMS HAIR

  • and 1 take off later, all work is destroyed :(

  • Please tell me the name of the song please !!!!

  • I wonder - If this piece of metal and cannons flown in air in the past??

  • @anthilation00dozey Yes, it was flown. Seven times before it crashed in 1933 killing 15 people. It was designed during the early '30s. Two of them were built between 1931 and 1933. It was the biggest non jet engine aircraft ever built. Funny thing is that the guy who built it, Kostyantyn Kalinin, a WWI veteran, was executed in 1938 under the accusation of being an "enemy of the state"...

  • Just think on the useless that plane is, just imagine the amount of time and resources needed to build that monster, that's actually is totally unmanueverable, and slow, that plane would have been a giant turkey for 109 and 190, and i'm not taking in count the 262 with 4 30mm Mk108.

    IMO a total pointless plane

  • @ppunk4 I think when you look at it as a prototype, or an R&D tool, or a manufacturing/scientific challenge, it is not pointless at all. It's like that saying that the path is more important than the goal. If we follow your way of thinking, research is useless, Google Lab is useless, going into space is useless, and so on. But in 10 or 50 years, you'll look back and realize it was, indeed, for part of it, usefull. Cheers.

  • stalin rot's in hell! and he is waiting for kim jung il and g.w.bush :)

  • @C3INOMAHA lol il kims son is even worst

  • @nolifemerc And what, exactly, have all your poison-spitting comments to do with that K-7? Please tell me, I am hungry to learn something new about big historical planes.

  • @C3INOMAHA I bet he has to share his cave with Hitler, Mussolini, Hiroito, Churchill and Mao tse Tung

  • @MrRammsteinKicksAss what the hell was so bad about chirchill. he was the only good politician in the world at that time. in fact he was the one who tried to warn britain about hitler invading europe , and he warned FDR about stalin too. i dont see anything wrong he did.

  • @speed150mph The Bombings of German cities and other non-militaric targets. Sure it was war and the Germans did the same. But they were judged for what they did. Churchill, Stalin and Truman (nukes on Japan) weren't

  • @MrRammsteinKicksAss yeah well if it wasnt for the a bombing of europe by bomber command and the eighth air force, we would all be speaking german and saying hail hitler in the morning. and they didnt target civillian targets, they targeted industrial tagets. accidents did happen due to navigation, weather ect. even today their are still accidental civiallian deaths, and we have lazer guided bombs. 

  • @MrRammsteinKicksAss ..... you cannot impose today's politically correct view of war on those fighting for freedom in WWII. It was survive or die...nothing in between. Germany and Japan initiated the war (there is a good arguement WWII was nothing more than a continuation of WWI but I leave that for another time) and were bent on world domination by force. BTW, the nuke attacks on Japan actually saved hundreds of thounds to millions of lives on both sides. Read about Okinawa for starters.

  • @speed150mph Churchill treated Ireland like Hitler treated most of Europe, pretty much. Ask an Irishman if he thinks Churchill with his heroic Black and Tans were so great after massacring unarmed civilians.

  • @C3INOMAHA Stalin's greatest leader in history

  • @SNAlPER As great as Hitler. Their achievements and terrors were pretty much alike. May him rot in hell.

  • @C3INOMAHA

    Stalin and Kim will diffently go to hell

    But where did george bush come into the picture?

    HES NOT EVEN A COMMUNIST!

  • Stalin was a men, he was did many good things for our country. And you can't told that about him.

    You don't live here and you don't know many. I'll hate America and many other, but I am not wrote this here....

  • @andrey1917red Many good things da, among these good things you counting those 20 million souls he took out of paranoia? Da tovarish Stalin many good things!

  • @C3INOMAHA Jung Il's already there, and they better not get their hopes up for Bush. He's going somewhere else.

  • Like !

  • Boy,,, Them Russians love to make big planes, don't they. I'm shocked that the plane flew at all with landing grear that provided so much drag and 7 heavy engines with such little power to weight ratio. Such a thick airfoil would provide a lot of lift but a lot of drag too. Don't even want to think of fuel economy.... Bet it was very thirsty!!!

  • @Landotter1 right

  • Everyone who says this bomber is fake should do more Modern History at school this Bomber was built to scare the shit out of anyone who tried to go against it but by production jet engines were implemented which stopped this project it was though a massive feat by Russian Aviation Engineers to even get it to fly which it did but not fast and ran out of fuel very fast.

  • Yes, they actually built a couple for show and tell. they proved to slow to be practical by the time they were actually built.

  • Fake

  • @rodrigodlm Not fake. This was actually an idea Russia hate. Crazy bastards arent they?

  • wenn das bild nich so blöd wackeln würde...

  • Konečne volačo po česky. A vyzerá zaujímavo.

  • Fake. This plane was only in project, never build

  • @MeltedDetech Look up in wikipedia "К-7 (самолёт)"

  • FAKE!!! Clearly not ACTUAL footage of the plane! Who do you think youre fooling with windows movie maker FX??!?!??!?!??!111?!?

  • @whatsiteverwas

    youre a fake

  • @RomanZzzzzzzzz a fake what? Say it, I dare ya!

  • @whatsiteverwas

    YOU ARE ! dirty bastard !

  • @RomanZzzzzzzzz a fake WHAT?!

  • @whatsiteverwas

    dont play dumb with me boy

  • what is the consumption and mileage?

  • . aviation . ru / k7 / k7giant

    this plane not fake

  • Russians love wasting money.

  • @Ibringthetruth1 in russia money wastes you

  • @Ibringthetruth1

    Americans love to waste money. 48% of the year money pot goes for the military thats the waste.

  • @Ibringthetruth1 yes, but not as americans.

  • isn't there another video like this in better quality but anyway this would be one great target plane for all those a2a combat planes

  • a big and slow flying target, nice^^

  • reminds me a boss-fight in metal slug xDxDxD

    

  • if this was real half of germany will be destroyed during ww2

  • @Jacksack123b It actually was real but wasnt around in WW2

  • @roark02 D:

  • @Jacksack123b A things like that were absolete by WW2.

  • This is Chuck Norris's Post delivery plane....

  • WTF????!!!!!!!!! )))))

  • Simulated video of still photos. Some of the photos are really just renderings of proposed versions which were never built. Like the one with the guns on it. Check Wikipedia folks.

  • @Partok81 wikipedia works in macdonalds.

  • What's with the scary as song?

  • do a barrel roll!

  • This is a fantasy.

  • @TheFunkadelicFan what an utter clunker of a plane .

  • actually this was not a bomber but was intended to be a flying aircraft carrier

  • Shity failure ahehe

  • The only unit built crashed with 14 people on board from structual failure in 1933. The man who designed this airplane was shot as an enemy of the state in 1938.

  • @AugustusLarch there was 20 ppl on board and 15 of them died ...

  • @SteelCrash

    That's even more horrible. What a tragedy for those people.

  • @AugustusLarch yea but as far as i knov the acttualy continued the work...

  • @SteelCrash

    It's the same situation for Airacuda from Bell Aircrafft in the states. It was unstable as well and a beast of it's own size.

  • 1,000,000 balsa trees were used to make this plane.

  • Wodka is cheap in russia.

  • there pilots are the worlds most respected too

  • The first guy to fly this piece of crap had some real "Cahones"...

  • а он смог взлететь?!!??

  • @MrGeroin666

    Yes, it flew 11 times. Crashed though.

  • I can't help but feel some sympathy for Russian military personnel. There overseers in that system treated them like an expendable resource, still to this day don't concern themselves with the safety and well being of the common man. I wonder how the crew and pilots "volunteered" for the mission to fly this monstrosity.

  • name of the song? :D

  • lol they watch too much Gundam.

  • Germans had a mega tank, russians had a mega plane to drop 100 nukes on the mega tank at once, the end.

  • Holy Crap!!!

  • Tupolev also created a monster plane--the Maxim Gorky, which was even bigger. It too crashed, and a replacement was built, but it also crashed--although the crashes of that bird may have been more attributable to pilot error. The Maxim Gorky was so big, it could carry 72 passengers, plus it had a 16 line telephone exchange, sleeper suites, a bar, a buffet, a film processing lab, a small movie theater, a laundry, a pharmacy, and a printing press. It was all about propaganda.

  • @DandAinTac The Maxim-Gorky was real, this thing is a FAKE. It never existed.

  • @klesmer On what basis do you claim it's fake? It seems pretty well-documented. I've read about it in books, there are pictures, and clips. I admit it looks outrageous, but I've never seen any indication that it was all faked. Do you have any references?

  • @DandAinTac What books? I have been in aviation buff and history student for for over 60yrs and this abortion has never shown up anywhere but on You tube.

  • @klesmer The one that comes to mind right off is "The World's Worst Aircraft" by Bill Yenne. I'm sure I've seen it elsewhere though, and there are many Internet sources. There are also phony computer image versions with heavy gun turrets, extra engines, and possibly an enlargement of the aircraft, which could easily lead one to believe that the entire thing is fictional. The Russians have always been fond of building BIG.

  • @DandAinTac Yes, Ivan like's 'em big but this thing was labled a fake the first time it appeared on You Tube several years ago. And don't by anymeans believe everything you see or read on the 'net. Another fake is the stunt plane landing with one wing missing.

  • @klesmer Do you have a link? I've never seen anything to indicate that the Kalinin K-7 is fictional. Certainly there are fictional VERSIONS of it--models and computer images, with enhanced size, battleship gun turrets and such, but the plane itself seems to have been real. As far as not believing everything you see or hear on the web--that cuts both ways. Claims that something is fake should also be met with caution. What are your sources?

  • @DandAinTac Dude, if you want to believe this thing is real, knock youself out. I am sure that will make the Easter bunny and Toothfairy quit happy. If you are fortunate enough to be around avaiators or atend airshows I wouldn't bring this airplane up in any conversations.

  • @DandAinTac mDude, I stand corrected. After deciding to put my money where my mouth is I did some research. The Kalinin did exist, one was built. It was large but not as huge as some pictures on You Tube would have you believe. It crashed in a test fllight killing 14 people. Kalinin was executed as an enemy of the state in the late '30's. I guess I owe the Easter Bunny an appology. PS, It was pretty much kept a secret becouse it was an embarassment to Stalin.

  • @klesmer That's all exactly right. Thanks for "manning up" to it. You know, looking at some of the huge and outrageous hardware the Ivan has produced over the decades, I can't blame someone for skepticism in the age of Photoshop. The Mil-12 Homer, the Maxim Gorky, the Typhoon class sub, the Lun class Ekranoplane, the Antonov AN-225--all seem fantastic and implausible. One of the reasons I'm fascinated by Russian hardware.

  • @DandAinTac I like Russian hardware too, in the form of Mosin Nagant 91/30's and Tokorev svt-40's.

  • The real question is... Will it blend?

  • Well, did it ever get off the ground ?, how much fuel did it use in 1 minute ?, was there an on-board hotel, bowling alley, gymnasium ?

  • @PupuTheClown It flew, but not well. I think it crashed killing the passengers. Engineering in the Soviet Union in the early 30s was just not advanced enough to produce successful aircraft of this size. Stalin had poor Kalinin shot as an "Enemy of the State" several years later.

  • '

    oh nooo,,,

    why ussr russia did copy steal from american biggest airplane was a SPRUCE GOOSE,,,'

    america was first,,,

    ussr russia is LAST

  • @bestamerica well this was from a real ountry so ussr wins

  • THEDUDESONSROCKs,

    '

    nah nah,,,

    ussr russia is never win,,,

    ussr russia is too much CHEAT alot

  • @bestamerica что ты можеш знать мудак не образованный

  • NYSHK !

  • The stupid and cheap "old film" plug-in that you used in this video is really annoying.

  • Lol awesome song. Fuck modern music bring back more of that stuff.

  • Kanker nep

  • it was desined during first World war

  • I have to say that despite URSS was a regime the russian engineers seem to be very free to design nearly whatever they have in mind though.

  • who says it wouldnt of get off the ground? they said the same thing to rosial donald!

  • so fake

  • @Gingervention you've got to be kidding....

  • @dirtTdude no this is fake there is a program to make fake pics that look old

    goof

  • @Gingervention nope this plane is real .. i

  • @thomaspruzina

    Most fighters don't lock the G limits, they can typically pull higher for a brief period of time. Su-47 would've never came to be if Russians learned something from the American X-29, and that is that forward swept wings are not suitable with the current material technology we have,

  • This is a battleship. A motherfucking flying goddamned gayassed battleship

  • was this ever actually made? and if so, did it ever fly?/

  • Идиотам - идиотово!

    Fack!

    One idiot is only one idiot,

    many idiots to carriyng live of my daugter and too...

    Thets me - no!

    kiss my pliese in ass! Whis all your wars!

  • je to nejak "male" :D

  • wtf is this?

  • Der unterschied... die deutschen hättens gebaut ;) Vorsprung durch Technik !

  • mounting battleship-size turrets on an airplane.. Why not!?

  • Very Nice

  • in sovjet russia plane flies you

  • just a good, good fake...

  • Ok is like the the guy who had the small penis so he buys a big truck to compensate for it? I'm sensing some penis envy here comrade.

  • i like the song too, do you know its name ??

  • B-52

    

  • everything is bigger in russia.

  • I bet from 700 miles away all those engines just sound like a LOT of little farts...

  • I started dancing to that crazy russkie muzakski and broke everything in my house.

  • Awesome... but does this just happen to remind anyone of the planes from the "Nausicaa" movie?

  • @thomaspruzina messerschmitt arent from russia, they are from germany retard

  • actually the original design for this plane was german lol

  • @kornek21 lol i thought the same thing

  • russian designers had a little to much vodka to drink during that year...

  • @cr9527 probbably

  • @cr9527 hahaha...lol man!!! well said...hahaha...

  • @cr9527 actually, russians are very good at building airplanes. world class. for instance, they built one of the most mobile planes ever, the SU-47.

  • @Jepserjeppe

    Su-47 is a P.O.S., Russians should've learned the lesson from the Americans about building forward swept wings. Instead, they are just learning it now.

  • @cr9527 aircraft vs aircraft combat is more or less all about turning abilities, put a su-47 loaded with sidewinders and machine-guns up against a F-14 Tomcat with the same equipment, the f14 would crash and burn. without doubt. Americans should learn not to build aircrafts with variable wings.

  • @Jepserjeppe

    1. Aircraft vs aircraft today is more about sensors and avionics than maneuverability

    2. Variable wings are a design several times better than forward swept wings. Russians just learned this after they ignored the American x-29

  • @cr9527 variable wings are proven to have more cons then pros, they're to expensive, fucks up the airplanes aerodynamic structure and adds way to much weight to the aircraft. and if you have good turning abilities, you avoid danger much more effectively, and therefore get behind the enemy much easier, and ones you have an aircraft with high maneuverability behind an aircraft with worse maneuverability, the fight is won.

  • @Jepserjeppe

    Variable Wings allows for a far better flight envelope, where it would perform better at all flight regimes at the cost of expense, and weight.

    Forward swept wings sacrifices a part of the flight envelope for another, causes great airframe fatigue, and eventually failure.

    In a modern dogfight, agility is a non issue 90% of the time, where the fight is over before the pilots see each other.