Hello, I pioneered Carbon Sequestration - Clean Coal Burning Technologies. In, 1987 I tried to obtain a Patent but Canada denied it and almost killed me. I moved to USA and it continued. However, I knew it was a Trillion dollars deal but I am not supposed to be rich. I recycle bottles, cans and plastics from garbage bin to survive. I am still pleased to crystallize it for them.
This dosen't even sound right. Look into solar activity. Don't pay for this stuff. Genetically modified organism "food" is a real problem, not the co2.
global warming is a hoax and climate change is natural. These "doomsday" people are saying this stuff for making money only, and the best way to control and make people believe/comply is with fear. Ordinary people should be researching this and see the other side of things. There are always two sides to everything said out in the world. Stop believing everything you hear or it will certainly be your downfall in life.
zupf, which fossil fuel lobby group do you work for?
The SCIENCE is peer reviewed and it is PROPER and NECCESSARY for scientists to use words like "may", "might", etc... And zupf, please point me to where the "science" informing your opinions has been peer reviewed. If you cannot, please preface your comments with an appropriate disclaimer of subjectivity. Or simply just refrain from spreading disinformation.
The burden is on you to prove carbon causes global temperatures to rise; not me. Which scientists have PROVEN that carbon causes temperatures to rise? None. Try again.
What about the "Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change"? Junkscience(dot)com is offering $500,000 to anyone who can scientifically prove that CO2 causes global warming. Still no offers? WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?
fuck....theyre turning the world into a nice popcorn kernel....sure it'll be ok in a few years....but...eventually it'll go ''POP!'' and hhaha we screwed.
Philip Stott, emeritus professor of biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, said climate change is too complicated to be caused by just one factor, whether CO2 or clouds. He said: "The system is too complex to say exactly what the effect of cutting back on CO2 production would be or indeed of continuing to produce CO2. "It is ridiculous to see politicians arguing over whether they will allow the global temperature to rise by 2c or 3c."
You have juvenile rebuttals. I see a great future for you in the IPCC. Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists : "models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are incoherent and invalid from a scientific point of view".
The IPCC report is replete with words like "may", "might", "projected", "could" and "possibly". That isn't science, it's socialist hysteria. The debate isn't over because we never had one to begin with.
haha pikey? go on the web of science boy there's over 1000 scientific peer reviewed journals and papers. how many of those scientists disagree with the science behind global warming? not 1. You just hear bs spin in he media, and have formed some biased misinformed opinion. When really you don't know shit.
Heat coming in from the sun is more infrared. It has much shorter wavelength. The surface of the earth radiates energy back out at longer wavelengths, which the atmosphere absorbs better.
ummm, you mean infrared is *longer* wavelength than sunlight, which peaks about green? Yes, sunlight sent back toward space is longer and better absorbed before reaching space.
you don't know it can be done safely, it puts up the price to a point where modern solar thermal is actually cheaper, solar is available now, we don't have time to experiment, big dollars help make big lies.
Whomevem came up the idea of pumping emissions into the ground is leading the indusrty in the wrong direction. Carbon Dioxide can be utilized to increase the BTU value of coal burned by 33% in absence of oxygen.
Hello, I pioneered Carbon Sequestration - Clean Coal Burning Technologies. In, 1987 I tried to obtain a Patent but Canada denied it and almost killed me. I moved to USA and it continued. However, I knew it was a Trillion dollars deal but I am not supposed to be rich. I recycle bottles, cans and plastics from garbage bin to survive. I am still pleased to crystallize it for them.
studenlawyer 1 year ago
co2 does not warm the earth's temperature. It is the other way round. When the earth's temperature rises, then CO2 goes up.
This basic truth pulls the heart out of the global warming hoax.
Sammicsno 1 year ago
use this in delta state nigeria
tech4156 1 year ago
Carbon can be captured and stored, beneficially, in cement.
MsLabMom 1 year ago
This dosen't even sound right. Look into solar activity. Don't pay for this stuff. Genetically modified organism "food" is a real problem, not the co2.
openbreakwhat 1 year ago
We can now capture carbon dioxide from power plants. Lets celebrate.
tnguyen318 1 year ago
More Corp rat carbon B.S
The last 7 years the earth has cooled.
Grow a tree
IceSurfbumb 2 years ago
global warming is a hoax and climate change is natural. These "doomsday" people are saying this stuff for making money only, and the best way to control and make people believe/comply is with fear. Ordinary people should be researching this and see the other side of things. There are always two sides to everything said out in the world. Stop believing everything you hear or it will certainly be your downfall in life.
wfb975t 2 years ago
Fuck Vattenfall...Fuck CCS...
Big Money for Vattenfall and the Dead for 10000 People of the Country!!!!
This is a Bomb for the People.
I live in this Country, but i would not live on a bomb!!!
CCS is a fuckin Bullshit!!!
PreussischerStolz 2 years ago
@PreussischerStolz #
Have you seen the whole movie, because if you had that then you would disagree
tomfertes 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PreussischerStolz
Have you seen the whole movie, because if you had that then you would disagree
tomfertes 1 year ago
@PreussischerStolz
Have you seen the whole movie, because if you had that then you would disagree
tomfertes 1 year ago
zupf, which fossil fuel lobby group do you work for?
The SCIENCE is peer reviewed and it is PROPER and NECCESSARY for scientists to use words like "may", "might", etc... And zupf, please point me to where the "science" informing your opinions has been peer reviewed. If you cannot, please preface your comments with an appropriate disclaimer of subjectivity. Or simply just refrain from spreading disinformation.
selwynr 3 years ago
The burden is on you to prove carbon causes global temperatures to rise; not me. Which scientists have PROVEN that carbon causes temperatures to rise? None. Try again.
zupf 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
energetic fun smart and loves this video
lets chat 2T
017237 3 years ago
i need this video on my hard disk??
how to get it??
plz reply
simplyjunkie 3 years ago
@simplyjunkie
go to keepvid (dot) com and download the video to your hd there
schwarzegeld 5 months ago
What about the "Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change"? Junkscience(dot)com is offering $500,000 to anyone who can scientifically prove that CO2 causes global warming. Still no offers? WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?
zupf 3 years ago
fuck....theyre turning the world into a nice popcorn kernel....sure it'll be ok in a few years....but...eventually it'll go ''POP!'' and hhaha we screwed.
artlesssurface 3 years ago
If carbon "traps heat", why doesn't it also "block" the sun's heat from reaching Earth? I reject this EU carbon hysteria.
zupf 4 years ago
wow your stupid. When the suns rays hit Earth they turn into heat. The heat is then bounced back at Earth by carbon in the atmosphere retard.
jmevo 4 years ago
What should I google to aborb the wisdom that you just pulled out of you arse?
zupf 4 years ago
Philip Stott, emeritus professor of biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, said climate change is too complicated to be caused by just one factor, whether CO2 or clouds. He said: "The system is too complex to say exactly what the effect of cutting back on CO2 production would be or indeed of continuing to produce CO2. "It is ridiculous to see politicians arguing over whether they will allow the global temperature to rise by 2c or 3c."
zupf 4 years ago
You have to be a moron to not think that spewing all this crap in the air can not be doing anything.
jmevo 4 years ago
You have juvenile rebuttals. I see a great future for you in the IPCC. Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists : "models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are incoherent and invalid from a scientific point of view".
zupf 4 years ago
Your statement is completely mis-informed. I respectfully request that you go read the recent IPCC report and educate yourself in all of this.
YassiePassie 3 years ago
The IPCC report is replete with words like "may", "might", "projected", "could" and "possibly". That isn't science, it's socialist hysteria. The debate isn't over because we never had one to begin with.
zupf 3 years ago
you're an idiot! classic twat spewing shit on the bottom of a youtube video! Textbook! ha
mattcreese88 2 years ago
Thank you for your useful commentary, pikey.
zupf 2 years ago
haha pikey? go on the web of science boy there's over 1000 scientific peer reviewed journals and papers. how many of those scientists disagree with the science behind global warming? not 1. You just hear bs spin in he media, and have formed some biased misinformed opinion. When really you don't know shit.
mattcreese88 2 years ago
And which of those 1000 scientists offer proof that carbon causes global temperatures to rise? None. Thanks for your vapid input Pikey.
zupf 2 years ago
Yeah your right you know everything, you even knew that I was a pikey! But I know that you're a massive cunt!
mattcreese88 2 years ago
Heat coming in from the sun is more infrared. It has much shorter wavelength. The surface of the earth radiates energy back out at longer wavelengths, which the atmosphere absorbs better.
OOPS. I'M A SOCIALIST AGENT
FunnyDigestion 3 years ago
ummm, you mean infrared is *longer* wavelength than sunlight, which peaks about green? Yes, sunlight sent back toward space is longer and better absorbed before reaching space.
peseta11 2 years ago
What is this bull needed for? Stop cutting the trees, they will convert it!!
J1mZ 4 years ago 2
propaganda 21.12.2012
Turpsup 4 years ago
you don't know it can be done safely, it puts up the price to a point where modern solar thermal is actually cheaper, solar is available now, we don't have time to experiment, big dollars help make big lies.
grapes128 4 years ago
wrong info hottest years were 1937.not 1990
C. D. this will make earth burp
louis12346 4 years ago
Whomevem came up the idea of pumping emissions into the ground is leading the indusrty in the wrong direction. Carbon Dioxide can be utilized to increase the BTU value of coal burned by 33% in absence of oxygen.
Markos1978 4 years ago