Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (46)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i wish i could convey the monotone voice that simply just irritates my ears, but the only pause i can come up with is a comma sadly, i cant mimic slow droopy speech

  • The media is owned by jewish kabal the international jewish rabinical-banking mafia of RATS. Pentagon,congress,senate,Rat Black house headquarter is in Tel Aviv. Pinochet save Chile from jewish communist terror machine.The base of communism was always the JEWUSA. Watch this excellent documentary on the terror machine of jewish communism on YOUTUBE-JEWTUBE:" The Hidden History of Jewish Bolshevism & Freemasonry"

  • LMAO @ all the times they say "Anthrax" ...good stuff here mate! Both thumbs up!

  • The Zionist are just another red herring! Just like the Jews are used. The real evil behind it all are the Jesuits /Black Pope! The Zionists work together with them, same for Illuminati, Masons, ect.... The real string pullers are the Jesuits! When it comes down to it, it's a war that's been going on since the beginnings of time itself! This is all just another Inquisition or Crusade, name it whatever you like to! Bottom line is, it's a religious war! Which side are you on, Good or Evil?

  • There's trillions of dollars within every branch of Government via Stocks! That's also why the stock market is the way it is! All monies collected from every department within governments on local, state & federal departments can be found in something 99.9% have never heard about! The figures can be found in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports! Google them for your local! Watch "The Corporation Nation Master" on my channel or google it! Time to educate yourselves & share it folks :-))

  • yeah, it's all nice but i'd rather he did not subscribe to the global warming conspiracy.

    like the iraqi WMD lie, climate change is obvious: in only couple of centuries (and most of it is actually happening over the last decades) we are releasing CO2 that took MILLIONS of years to store... it's highly optimistic to think nothing will come of it. and there are other aspects like domino effect of releasing natural methane or a role oil-based products play in sustaining levels of food production.

  • @jogayot other _unproven_ theoretical effects, which might also be highly pessimistic thinking.

    Infact, I'd like to hear any argument you have in support of the contention that mankinds actions

    can possibly alter in even the smallest degree, the trajectory of the earth on its orbit through the

    solar system's goldilocks zone.

    No I'd really like to hear it... I just don't think you've got one.

  • @TDD _unproven_ lol

    yeah, because increase in CO2 levels is bogus (its warming effect isn't real, fuck basic physics). both south and north ice caps aren't melting at all... it's all caused by teh Sun! you'll only believe it after we perform the greatest experiment of our age and start killing each other over shrinking resources like the Christmas Island people.

    and it's all an evil cabal by the scientists to create global government as if having more democratic system than UN was a bad idea...

  • @TheDemocracyDelusion I didn't say global warming is unproven, I said the theories you just alluded to are unproven, but far be it from me to talk sense when your clearly having a wonderful apocalypse.

    I do have long winded variants of my comments where I provide backing and evidence, but tbh I really can't be arsed providing them, I suggest you breath in and out of a paper bag a few times, might help.

  • @TDD apocalypse? heh! no, it may actually be very mild. spanning a century or two and tens of slow regional conflicts that ulcer not shown on MSM tv, but when bean-counted over decades like e.g. darfur struggle between farmers and nomadic herders end up going into millions of killed overall. then there are starvations or discomforts of social upheavals due to mass migrations. you don't grasp basic physics or can't even begin to "dispute" simple quantitive argument so don't tell me i've no clue.

  • @jogayot It may appear that way to a brainless moron like yourself, but my real disdain for this debate stems from

    1) lack of interest

    2) lack of space to make reasoned argument

    3) your obvious and blatant self-righteous attitude.

    Clue: your opinions are not the laws of physics, your opinions are an approximation thereof, and not a platform for you to suggest a superiority at the outset of a discussion.

    In otherwords, IMHO, your a self-righteous tosspot who think's he knows everything.

  • @TDD no, i'm a tosspot who has studied enough of physics far beyond elementary school level (which you on numerous occasions have displayed a lack of grasp of) to feel humbled by our unprecedented ability to model such complicated phenomenon as our biosphere. after all it is in meteorology that such mathematical innovations like chaos theory have emerged. and while understanding that politicians/media have miscommunicated climate change i, in my limited way, share scientists concerns.

  • @jogayot Do you know what a goldilocks zone is?

    Do you agree or disagree that for the earth to get as hot as venus, it would have to be in the same orbit as venus?

    Do you agree or disagree that the largest factor in planetary temperature conditions is infact radiation received from the sun and that it outwieghs other factors by many orders of magnitude?

    Do you agree the atmosphere is ALWAYS acting as a greenhouse and that the strongest GHG is water vapour by several orders of magnitude?

  • @TDD

    yes, i told you already that it encompasses all three rocky planets and asteroid belt. only venus has got runaway greenhouse effect preventing evolution of water based biosphere and mars happened to be too light to sustain atmosphere trapping enough of the energy it's getting.

    no... of course not. e.g. goldilocks zone can be defined as far away as in orbit around gas giants.

    yes. but the problem is in sudden, small inbalances in CO2 driving water vapour inbalance and turbulent change.

  • @jogayot That's an extremely loose definition of the goldilocks zone, and I would suggest, based on the available evidence, that the true extent of the GZ, is somewhat less than you suggest, IE, it starts well inside the orbit of venus (too hot), and ends well before the orbit of mars (too cold).

    Can you understand the concept of the Absolute Goldilocks line, a hypothetical extremely narrow line whereupon equal radiation is received and lost by a planet in a given time period?

  • the AGL would be very narrow and the earth would likely be to one side or the other of it at different times of its orbit and when other planets are in different positions. It's a relative line and it keeps shifting.

    The earth therefore is always either trending towards warmer (inside the AGL), or trending towards cooler outside the AGL.

    The atmospheric effects you mention are worst case scaremongering hypotheses, based on scant evidence.

    The atmosphere is always a acting as a green house...

  • @TheDemocracyDelusion

    man... and where the hell have you learned about this AGL? or is this your own invention? all of the energy we receive from the sun is eventually radiated back (see the zeroth law of thermodynamics for starters).

    as you mentioned already levels of CO2 were a lot different back in the history... but the problem is not so much in their level but their abrupt change (driven most certainly by us since there is no other mechanism found so far) (cont.)

  • @jogayot we are disturbing an equilibrium of the biosphere. and as finally after decades of talking about it in popular press it managed to be explained that it is not so much about climate warming but climate change. ironically it will lead to places like europe getting colder shortening the vegetative period and less crops on the other hand really cold places will get "only" cold and already warm places even warmer shrinking arable land etc...

    your imaginative AGL is irrelevant!

  • @jogayot bollox is it irrelavent, its the most important factor in determining temperature at the surface of a planet by many orders of magnitude.

    You green earth nazi scare-mongerers don't impress us all with your nonsense. Delicate balance? what a crock of shit, nature is brutal and hardy and life has an indomitable way of adapting to all conditions, it's not a china tea pot we might accidentally break.

    Bollocks too it I CBA bashing my head against your brainwashed idiocracy.

  • @TheDemocracyDelusion that's a very thoughtful comment... it's still irrelevant! since earth's orbit is constant. and there is noticeable change in average temperature already. i'm far from being a "green earth nazi scare-monger". as i said i care little about global warming "politics" and am of the opinion that we won't do anything about it anyway - the ungreen energy sectors will make sure of that. i just don't like idiots talking about science as if they knew "better".

  • @jogayot Your the only one talking like you know better... what was it you said, "fuck the laws of physics" because I questioned your OPINION.

    The earths orbit is far from fucking constant, a little high school relativity will tell you that. And even if it were constant, then the chances of it being bang on the AGL are practically nil, so it will either be inside it or outside it, either getting warmer or cooler over time.

    I don't expect you to favour truth over your own ego so whatever.

  • @TheDemocracyDelusion ROTFL. you are in denial of reality. even if there were any relativistic effects involved (miniscule at the Earth-Sun distance) they would have to be caused by something... as they were present since forever. it's not clear at this point what are you arguing for or against, lost in the logical shambles of throwing together "reasonably not" sounding rationalization. what's next? it's the nibiru! lizard men's haarp vapour trails... ROTFL.

  • @jogayot No your the one who is in denial of reality, and making absurd claims whilst laughing at the truth... your not related to the buddha are you?

    The eccentricity of earths orbit can change the distance between the earth and the sun by upto something like 5 million kilometers.

    The other planets, particularily jupiter have their effects, the earths orbit is NOT static or stable, muppet.

    Go ROTFL some place else moron.

  • @TheDemocracyDelusion TROLOLOLOLO!

    you mean the difference between aphelion and perihelion of earth's orbit IS 5 million kilometers. and it describes constant shape of earth's orbit exactly because it is a part of multibody system. otherwise it would have been circular. besides if there were indeed any effects due to jupiter or even saturn (first has a period of 11 the other 30 years) it would be trivial to correlate them to our over a century long observations of climate and biosphere. (cont.)

  • @jogayot and if there were ANY other influences on earth's orbit not accounted for be our present knowledge the hordes of bored astronomers would be all over it screaming their heads of in the race for the nobel prize.

    on the other hand i'm sure meteorologists conveniently forgot to plug this indeed important variable responsible for the average energy we receive from the sun into their models... and buried anybody trying to point out such brilliantly simple answer to their misgivings. ROTFLMAO!

  • @jogayot

    No don't try and tell me what I mean fucktard, I'm not suggesting anything controversial or unknown so fuck off already.

    I only entertained this debate this far because I remember you from back in the day on my old channel, but since I have no lost all respect for you, I won't be entertaining it or your commentry further.

    Goodbye.

  • Just to be clear, I have no problem with you being a skeptic or a believer on any subject, what I object too wholeheartedly and the reason why I have no interest in interacting with you, is that your clearly one of these youtube prima-donna's who is so self-absorbed with your own opinion your incapable of discussing it without resorting to fucktarded comments, ad homs and trying to make out your OPINION is beyond reproach and sufficiently holy that you can "ROFTL" at people who disagree.

  • For some reason the original doesn't show up on the top of searches if you justy type war by deception 2011. (weird! I'm guessing it's not just me). search for 'War by Deception 2011 shadow government and shadow economy' and it should pop up under username Rys2sense

  • It was made by Ryan Dawson . check him out at rys2senseDOTcom/anti-neocons

  • Fantastic gathering of facts and much research, your effort will be shared

    thanx

  • xclnt work, great job of exposing some of the worst conspiracies perpetrated by the US govt.

  • cheers for the upload! :)

  • who ever thumbs this down is a fucking asshole, this video is full of research and probebly took for ever to create, have some goddamn respect. You would shit your pants in the face of such a project

  • fantastic will there be a part 2

  • @TRUTHBOXNEWS No idea, I don't know the people that made it.

  • The sound totally sucks, but the footage and other information makes it worth the watch for sure. ;)

  • ace

  • Brilliant video, who is this guy?

  • @OrganGrindersSwing Dunno just found it and figured it was worth running, nice effort to the new film maker there!

  • This is absolutly AMAZING!

  • ¿Myth of global warming?

    ¡Paso!

    Suerte!

    

  • THIS JUST GAVE ME ALL THE ANSWERS I HAVE EVER NEEDED ON 9/11

  • @revron77 nice!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more