i personally dislike this interpretation of his no 5. you can tell (for those who have played it) that he has trouble playing 1:04 - 1:10, he rushed too much in the beginning.
If he has technical trouble then that has nothing to do with interpretation does it? To say that he rushed would mean his tempo wasn't kept even, which it was, for the entire work up to the 6 second interval you pointed out.
non capisco perchè varia solo le dinamiche della mano sinistra lasciando invariate quelle della destra all'inizio...in questo modo la destra copre parte de tema...
After he plays the Godowsky what is it that he plays? It sounds like a combination of the black-key and the opus 25 no 10? not sure about that, just going from memory.
Yes all three unbeleivable.He has some playful charm here not normally aparrent.hamelin is always elegant .Libeta too has fin de siecle charm.B. roughshod forced approach seems misplaced and TOO effortful.One thing late century art should not have.Bolet and Cherkassky are my choices with H.and Libetta.
I would say remarquable for sure. But certainly NOT up to Hamelin standard. Listen again how Hamelin always keeps the melody flowing even in the most terrifyingly difficult passages. Berezovsky sounds brilliant, but there's always a certain dryness to his playing, as opposed to the velvet of Hamelin's playing.
a lot of coughs...
gsarci2011 6 months ago
1:14 that transition is fucking beautiful
Csibon13 11 months ago
jajajaj sin pedal
belialah 1 year ago
Miraculous gold fingers looking like wearing gloves!
yysshhyy1 1 year ago
Peanuts for him T_T
parule 2 years ago
i personally dislike this interpretation of his no 5. you can tell (for those who have played it) that he has trouble playing 1:04 - 1:10, he rushed too much in the beginning.
danedaworld 2 years ago
If he has technical trouble then that has nothing to do with interpretation does it? To say that he rushed would mean his tempo wasn't kept even, which it was, for the entire work up to the 6 second interval you pointed out.
KennYWooD2 2 years ago
@danedaworld He plays this etude that way in all his verions - slowing down slightly at that point. The original etude is a cinch for him in reality.
MrGrigor99 2 years ago
he has no problems with 1'04 to 1'10 thank you very much. it's just an interpretation.
burobbi 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
smMastropiero 2 years ago
Dear danedaworld, you, my friend, have raised the stupid-comment bar to a really, really new level. Bravo!!!!!!
smMastropiero 2 years ago
@danedaworld you must be kidding. For real?
tombennettpiano 1 year ago
Funny how everyone is concentrating on holding on to their coughs, until the end.
jasonextreme 2 years ago 6
And they should. How people cannot go without coughing during a performance is beyond me.
KennYWooD2 2 years ago 5
Easy, take Ricola.
jasonextreme 2 years ago
where was this performance?
mystikaldreamer 2 years ago
why yes...yes it is....good chopin knowledge!!!
8585506 2 years ago
it's really cool how godowski intermixed a little of chopin's op 25 no 9!!!!!
8585506 2 years ago 2
non capisco perchè varia solo le dinamiche della mano sinistra lasciando invariate quelle della destra all'inizio...in questo modo la destra copre parte de tema...
rachm06 3 years ago
At 3:42 isn´t that a little mix of the butterfly etude?^^
addeex1 3 years ago
its called badinage. Nice repertoire.
mystikaldreamer 2 years ago
does anyone know: did anyone else play a concert like that? all chopin etudes+ all godowsky?
elrondsch 3 years ago
He has written 53 variations on the studies of Chopin. Only 3 times recorded all 53 by Geoffrey Douglas Madge, Carlo Grante and Marc-André Hamelin.
lottoformulier 3 years ago
thanks!!! i didnt know that)
elrondsch 3 years ago
The original is played first. The Godowsky variations are played after.
FredilYupigo 3 years ago
This is Texas chainsaw masacre :))
Impossible!
mytchilla 3 years ago
its kinda what your supposed to do to play fast in piano.... im just a beginner so hands really Suk at this =P
But i cant tell you how important it is to do this concept. Less tension, and less energy used for later... ITs just a good thing to do.
dezxdestruction 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey catch me in naked on my personal webpage meetyourfling(.Com)
111524
haywhitegirl 3 years ago
he plays it like he's playing with the study! it's so funny!!
i like it more than his version when he was younger. it's not so fast and has much more expression
catianalini 3 years ago
how come it's impossible to match the control picture on da speed demon register page... I tried 22 times... what the fcuk do you want... blood???
koffmaninoff 4 years ago
joe que maquina er tio, yo toco el estudio 5 en 1:53 y él en 1:34 y sin despeinarse
theCadencia 4 years ago
Human hands are truley the God's greatest creation.. Jeez... Not mine though OTL
Bachrules 4 years ago
Remarable
Bruce88keys 4 years ago
Ooo well done mr berezovsky
IAMLISZT 5 years ago 2
awesome , this is live k-nar recorded... respec from grim
terryregnar 5 years ago
I think he is shaking his hands because his wrists hurt after hours of playing. I restrict my training hours due to RSI.
Niekdiehard 5 years ago
After he plays the Godowsky what is it that he plays? It sounds like a combination of the black-key and the opus 25 no 10? not sure about that, just going from memory.
Pianobyme 5 years ago
Actually Godowsky combines opus 25 no 9 (the Butterfly Etude) with opus 10 no 5.
mstalcup 5 years ago
Yes all three unbeleivable.He has some playful charm here not normally aparrent.hamelin is always elegant .Libeta too has fin de siecle charm.B. roughshod forced approach seems misplaced and TOO effortful.One thing late century art should not have.Bolet and Cherkassky are my choices with H.and Libetta.
lovesGenet 5 years ago
Really well said =)
Archangeld 5 years ago
Remarkable, fantastic. Comparable to Hamelin for sure.
shilloshillos 5 years ago
I would say remarquable for sure. But certainly NOT up to Hamelin standard. Listen again how Hamelin always keeps the melody flowing even in the most terrifyingly difficult passages. Berezovsky sounds brilliant, but there's always a certain dryness to his playing, as opposed to the velvet of Hamelin's playing.
Ebubu69 4 years ago
Maybe because he plays it much faster (I think a bit too fast) and nearly without sostenuto pedal?
SecaMartin 4 years ago