Added: 4 years ago
From: wonderingmind42
Views: 76,985
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (541)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Bravo. (my comments: Time stamp approx 7:38 Why we quit and start making statements: add "quit because you suspect the human brain is not capable of understanding" - which does not mean belief in a god is ....)

  • OMG You are wonderful and teaching our babies...............Thank YOu Thank YOU diane Jean

  • Flashbacks to my graduate level methodology class for international relations, a social science. "That's not a science!" Maybe not, but critical thinking ftw. Thoroughly enjoyable video; you surely are doing God's work, I salute your efforts.

  • Oh i get it, its funny because he is wearing a newspaper hat.

  • Did the candle taste good? 

  • YOU'RE FREAKING EATING A CANDLE! You're awesome!

  • Self likes both the nature science and the religion philosophy, is great for business scene; is interested. I meddle with anything.

  • I LOVE when he talks about obvious facts and then he starts eating the candle. Love it...

  • the same argument can be had about recreational drugs

  • i totally love the hat jajaja

  • eat well excersize,,, die anyway,,,

    spend tons of money on idiotic social issues,,, die anyway,,,

    Sun remains a main sequence star, continually growing warmer and brighter by ~10% every 1 billion years.

    no matter what you do,,, the sun will GET you in the end,,,

    unless you LEAVE,,, that is where mankind needs to spend its money,,,

    on LEAVING,,,

  • YOu are one of my favorite youtube postres and I LUV trying to figure out how you control the mindless nulls. For those that havent seen it yet or belive it I will not spoil it . In this one you used ....Bl bla facts that you dont know, smart people said bla and therefore it must bla be true. This makes people feel smart. and also you used the you want this not me. All and all I have a lot of fun at ur videos.

    The phantom

  • LOL

    I love this....

    I have written that facts become dangerous when they calcify our ability to reason. In "fact" I do not trust facts.

    Thank you so much for this delightful lesson in proper interpretations and investigations..

    *****

  • Comment removed

  • hahaha did he eat the candle?

  • If Americans gave up their cars for the sack of the earth, half of them would collapse and die because their too fat to walk any distances.

  • And what wearing a paper hat makes him knowlegeable about global warming pull the over one.

  • This is tight! Lol. Keep Up the Great Work

  • The 1 + 1 = 2 thing made me lol. I'll add that to my book of random cool facts.

  • Holy crap it's LIke Water for Chocolate all over again! DON'T EAT THE CANDLES!

    Yeah, I already regret this comment -_-

  • Ok.....I understand every-thing what he said about problems in climate change but,Why did you eat the wick of the candle and eat it?

  • We could have done without the eating of the ......candle. Please.

  • The only important part of climate change is who foots the bill. If it's the consumer, nothing will change. If it is the energy companies, we will see affordable renewable energy. Any attempt to tax people for climate change will result in worsening the climate, and robbing the people. The latter being the direction we will go because globalists specialize exclusively in doing wrong with the veneer of right.

  • the candle is made out of a banana my science teacher did it

  • This whole video comes off as a little smug and a little too self assured. Science is full of mistakes, some publicized, some not. It portrays scientists as above emotional motives. It is true scientists assume human error and faulty thinking is inherent in there process and that it takes measures to remove it, however, even their method for removing faulty thinking is subject to poor judgement. It is hard to remove emotion from science and brother there is a lot of emotion in this debate.

  • This dude like to eat candles lol

  • Haha "unquote"! Oh and i love your videos by the way.

  • Where did you get that candle!!?

  • Science is Magic!

  • Sorry. Science has by far the worst track record.

    When will the next tsunami or earthquake or CME or meteor strike?

    When will you die?

    When will CA slide into the Pacific?

    How does complex DNA pop out of irradiated warm mud?

    The worst thing is this: What 'science' decides is true today may not be true next year. By your own admission your 'truth' is constantly changing, but somehow you have the best track record?? Not only that, but we have to go along with it or risk being ostracized.

  • @AshtonPhoto u make very good points but it all comes back to your beliefs i mean if your are a religious person you will have a different outlook on this stuff than if you believe in evolution it just all depends on your beliefs

  • @guhudaa

    You're absolutely right, it really does come down to what you believe.

    If this is all there is (just the physical) then this world is all we've got. We have not yet found another M-class planet that we could flee to if we mess this one up.

    I can see the logic and understand the reasoning, I just don't think that this is all there is.

  • @AshtonPhoto So what, in your view, is the field with the best track record?

  • You wouldn't ask that if you were old enough to remember the dire warnings about the coming 'ice age' the scientists said would destroy us all. That was not so long ago, and I remember being really worried about it.

    In ten years there'll be another made up calamity. The professional doomsayers will make sure we all hear about it, 99 percent of the people will buy it and the ones that don't will be maligned and ridiculed.

    On it goes...

  • @AshtonPhoto You see, pardon me for my youth, but the reason why I'm having a bit of trouble believing your claim that the scientists don't know what they're doing, is because I have an atmospheric science degree - with specialization in climatology - from the University of California at Berkeley. I am just interested to know who you would rather believe-- politicians? Religious leaders? Social activists? What field of study, in your view, has the best track record?

  • @AshtonPhoto the fact that you are sitting in front of a computer writing this would be proof that science isn't a perfect track record but its pretty damn good. I mean do you know for sure how this electronic message that you typed on your personal computer can be come "information" can see ....I'm going to go out on a limb and say I doubt it but you trust that it works...other wise you wouldn't have bothered to post this...

  • Ive seen that eating the candle trick like 20 times but it catches me off guard every time. as for your video you make very good points and explain it in a very clear way much respect

  • what type of candle was that? That was a neat trick :)

  • Dr. Don Easterbrook -"global-warming-is-over" a MORE HARMFUL global cooling will actually occur over the next few decades. Look him up.

    We had the most recorded global snow during the last decade than ever before....

  • Scientists, engineers, and lawyers, are the most dangerous people in the world, simply because they can convince themselves of anything, by "logic"...

    History shows this, over and over! Eugenics was brought to us by, "scientists"!

    Smart guys huh? Responsible for the murder of millions!

  • Did he just eat a candle?

  • eat a candle...

  • @TrueJLD It still has the BEST track record.

  • Comment removed

  • i wish you were my teacher

  • Only one question is raised, why the silly hat.

  • @heloizyjhenifer He said in the Index, because it's such a serious topic, he's going to try to relieve the atmosphere by wearing silly hats...

    Or he might just be into them...

  • @heloizyjhenifer I"m not sure if you've already found out or not, but he said in the Index that because this is such a serious topic, he wears the hats to try and lighten the atmosphere.

    ...Or he might just be into them...

  • i would've started with 1+1=2

    or maybe 1=1

    in list of obvious statements

    i dont believe he has a candle infront of him

    not now

  • @robtherub yeah, me neither

  • @robtherub but, 0.999... also equals 1

  • looks like kileymonster just got kicked out by me.the sixth to thumb him down.

  • sure, keep the hats - it's part of your style (i get that), but please, please, spend more time standing at the white board (sexy!)

  • Use visuals to complement what you're saying.

  • @kileymonster "We did not inherit this world and our lives from our fathers, we borrowed it from our children."

    /tattoo on arm

  • @kileymonster Hi. i agree with that statement. Many ways to look at things. One way is that everything that happens, happens because it is suppose to happen. We love, fight, save, create and destroy because this is what we do. We don't really care. Animals, all of us. tattoo on back?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • The reason its called Climate Crisis now is cause they realized there is much more to it than warming, theres hotter summers, colder winters, droughts/fires, floods, new species/deseases, extinctions, the whole climate & ocean currents get outta wack etc. It DOESNT END. And people are to stupid &/or blind to see that every min. we waste argueing we get closer to the point where we CANT change our fate so please respect all who try getting it through to all, we could just do nothing.... & die X-I

  • @CrazyClimate never mine i havent had either here in over 5 years. global warming on vacation?!?

  • @CrazyClimate i know you comment is a year old,

    but your right.

    i think that we dont chance and at the brink things go wrong and we are starving we want to change...

    western people are to greedy for sustainable solutions. and the citizens are to weak to do something well not in a group we are fundamental to economy and the power of the elite but to stupid and lazy to take action :(

    i think this a just on the end scenario next question is is that just enough im not sure.

  • @CrazyClimate i know you comment is a year old,

    but your right.

    i think that we dont chance and at the brink things go wrong and we are starving we want to change...

    western people are to greedy for sustainable solutions. and the citizens are to weak to do something well not in a group we are fundamental to economy and the power of the elite but to stupid and lazy to take action :(

    i think this a just on the end scenario next question is is that just enough im not sure.

  • Because while the overall temperature is rising, what that means in practical terms is that the estabilshed weather patterns around the world will change; hence the new term, "Climate Change".

  • Comment removed

  • he talks way to fast

  • Climatechange is FRAUDE !!

    CLIMATEGATE

  • From the Start Science, has been leaving out the most important part in the game: THE SPIRIT. There is a higher law, and an intelligence and even for that they DO GOT EVIDENCE, but no understanding, so if you ask your own soul, you will always have a straight answer on Nature. I believe personally that there are some visible and feelable changes in Nature and Disrespect resulting in Karma. I think it is both, human AND karmic reasons creating Climate Change. Do something.

  • so, just to be clear: the message here is we shouldnt trust the actual evidence we can see, we should trust "the scientists" interpretation

    OR in other words "never mind that there is not enough evidence to support the notion of human caused global warming/climate change let the agenda fuelled make up your mind for you"

    ???

    Shill.

    Disgusting.

  • Do any of you people here have a clue? Stop relying on what political conservatives feed you and check the research yourself. The evidence is OVERWHELMING....supported by several thousand independent studies! It does not take too much intellect to understand that we are having an impact. Some of you are stuck in the 80's.

  • the evidence is overwhelming?

    so its getting hotter is it?

    or are average temperatures getting a little bit colder in the UK right now?

    mmmm?

    "several thousand independent studies"?

    It does not take too much intellect to see that global warming is not by any means a "scientifically agreed fact".

    And that preaching about it is profitable.

    Science and profit make poor bedfellows.

  • ah HAHAHAHA! check "rachael4Edu" s profile, it was created just today only to answer these questions on "climate change"

    Look at her recent activity and check her comments.

    A profile created specifically to spread propaganda.

    Disgusting.

    Shill.

    not only that but... LAZY SHILL!

  • it's a reason it's called CLIMATE CHANGE and not global warming

  • whats the reason they started using the term climate change in just the last few years when before it was always global warming? please tell me

  • well before Al Gore said the earth was getting warmer. And yes i was correct but some areas are getting cooler. The term "Warming" refers to getting warmer but not every area is getting warmer. They just discovered that (as in one or two decades ago).

  • 1. the term global warming didnt start with Al Gore, I havent looked at your profile yet, but 5 quid says you are under the age of 25

    2. you were correct AND some areas are getting cooler? Riiiiight.

    3. the term "warming" means warming AND cooling?

    4. they JUST discovered we are warming AND cooling? and that is what the climate change debate is about? that man is simultaneously warming and cooling the planet to a dangerous degree? REALLY?

  • . ok i din't know that

    2. it is true (strangely)

    3. well warming means overall getting warmer

    4. well a change in climate fast (as in 100 year fast) is bad. Animals don't adopt in a time of 100 years. A new ice age can push reptile species down far. A new warm period can kill off many mammals. Both are bad, equal in danger.

  • Whats interesting is how you have come to this debate probably in the last few years so to you the notion of "climate change" and "global warming" are the same

    but for a moment try and see things from my perspective, when I was your age in school we were taught global warming meant just WARMING (the "greenhouse effect" it was taught as) so to me it looks like they are altering their position while the stats dont back it

    wouldnt that seem slippery to you?

    does that make sense?

  • i meant to say the notion of "climate" and "global warming" are the same or interchangeable to you , in your mind

    but that for older folks, this really is starting to look like a laughable attempt to fluff the actual data

    scientists are meant to go from objectively verifiable data not agenda fuelled subjective perspectives... I take your aware of the recent "climategate" scandal, emails from these "scientists" were intercepted with them describing how they cook the data.

    Why do that?

  • so say, global warming (which doesn't only mean warming, which is a common misconception; it generally means global climate change) does not exist. okay so, would you suggest we do nothing different from that of what we are doing now, we being humans? should we continue to burn fossil fuels to power our homes and our transportation? because, the planet, is running low on these things. taking the path towards alternative energies would not only satisfy those who feel global warming is a real and

  • serious threat, but would also help preserve the near future of our planet. people need to stop arguing over this issue and work towards this. it isn't a bow down to authority thing, not at all. it's a, please, please help us in saving the damn planet thing. with population growing at an ever-increasing rate, and with the newly developing third world countries, the planets resources are dwindling faster than ever and steps need to be made now before having no energy becomes a worldwide conflict

  • alternative fuel sources are of course a valid and responsible avenue to pursue

    but lets call it what it is, the pursuit of alternative fuel to reduce pollution and bin this whole fallacious "climate change" money spinning red herring and the so called "carbon taxes" that are being proposed of the back of this fallacious concept

    overpopulation is another valid and completely different avenue of discussion of course

    neither are related to THIS video post however

    no prevarication

  • Here, here Streetfightsecrets. Sounds like you don't bring a globalist agenda.

  • i learned from books publish in 1994. When i was first introduced to global warming was in 2003. They called it GLOBAL WARMING. Next in the year 2006 i warned allot of people about it and 2 years later in 2008 i was told that it was climate change.

    Learn from this video, it says science is always trying to be disproved. And no they aren't the same, and heres the kicker we don't know if its bad or not. Climate change can go in both ways. Global warming can only go to a overall warmer planet.

  • hahaha!

    you are 22

    the fiver is mine ;-)

  • that was he not i no the first line

  • global warming is not merely about the warming of every spot on the planet, it's about global climate stability. basically everything i see that you've argued in the recent comments are garbage considering that fact. stop spreading uneducated garble

  • so your argument boils down to

    1. if you dont agree your talking "garbage"/ "garble"

    2. submit to authority they know more than you, stop thinking and do as your told

    er... thank you for your efforts, but you have not changed my mind on this occassion.

  • a) i did not say either of those things

    b) i see you sir, are a lost cause and if i'm wrong, i don't feel like spending the time right now explaining thinds so

    c) have a good life

  • a.yes you said both of those things, its right there in black and white "garbage" and "garble"

    b. in the sense that I wont blindly submit to authority and you cant make me? yes I am a "lost cause" to that agenda and you really should give up trying.

    c. yes, you have no real argument to please do just give up

  • why trust "the scientists" interpretation? b/c it's their job to figure these things out and prevent catastrophes (the extreme) from occurring. it's the same reason why you trust say, a civil engineer, to design and construct infrastructure to face the extremes of the environment that may occur in the future. science has a history of basing its statements and suggestions-of-change on either evidence or strong likelihoods....and stop being so paranoid of propaganda scams, it's just ridiculous

  • this guy sounds like US goverment ... his words expressions, demeanor, it stinks of official. hey heres an idea... stop producing everything at maximum profit and instead regulate it so we can become harmonic with the eviroment!! i wonder if we would be in this position in the 1st place !!!!

  • scientists? aren't they people who come up with theories and then prove or disprove them? proof is science fact, unproven is science fiction. global warming is far from being proven so get over it.

  • Love your shirt "Trust me"

    Tell me where to get one XD

  • Look there! The shore is moving!....Aaaah....Lol....I thought you were fucked until you said that...crazy bastard.

  • I was searching for articles about "the nature of science" and I came upon this video while googling.

    I'm a big fan of critical thinking and the scientific method and you explain the "nature of science" very well. You are a very clear thinker and your arguments are solid. Much respect.

  • lol did you play n64? (expansion pack)

  • you lost me at 6:00

  • the hat should be tin foil, sillllllllly!

  • I can't focus in what are u talkin about couse i can't stop wondering why this guy is using a newspaper hat

  • when you just want to be annoyed and look at something that annoys you...this guy does it for me. These types invent doomsday scenarios and then get worked up about them; and then annoy everyone else with their fantacies...they should get a life or work out doomsday scenarios as a result of "going green" or whichever way they think the rest of us has to go...well can't waste time here; got to go somewhere in my 2.5litre engine car...

  • HAHAHAHA you aint the candle! CLASSIC

  • CAN U CALL ME

  • "Get informed and let it change you"

    Buckminster Fuller is a hero of mine since I was 20 and met him.

    You are no Joe Schmo. I love your sarcasm. You are so intelligent I wish we were friends and could talk.

    You are hilarious but right on. Thank you so much.

    -----------59 yr old psychic medium very interested in Quantum.

  • Nothing is going to happen in 2012, it is simply the fact that making the next circle in the calendar it would take a LOT of stone, and therefor wouldn't make sense. it's the luckiest day of the year to them it is 13/13/13. Nothing to worry about, their LONG long count calendar counts past it.

  • I HOPE U GET TO READ THIS.........i no that u probly get alot of meseges but i was wondering.....

    i herd Albert Instign sed that there was going 2 be a polor shift in (2012) IS THIS TRUE? if yes what do u think about it? And do you think it has anything to do with what whe perseve as climat change 2day

  • what was that candle made of?

  • hm, what a nerd? This guy is so cool, I can't even get over it

  • What a nerd......... A good lesson about the wrong attitude......

  • Re 'How it all Ends'. My only problem is that if man made global warming is not true but we behave as if it is there seem to be two consequences I haven't seen addressed.

    Firstly, the third world will be stopped from enjoying the benefits of industrialisation and, secondly, we will have to accept nuclear power.

  • i just want to say i like what your doing :P your making ppl think and its working out quite fine as i beleve looking at all these comments =D

  • You mention Rounded Numbers? Way to GO! You use imprecise imaginary numbers & expect to get precise, unimagined results! How logical. You win. We should doubt all perception, dwelve our heads into our deepest workings & chomp rocks that thought-transform into milk duds. NOTHINGS knowable since GASP we don't know Everything & might be wrong about Something. Your not even sure you exist. The universe bears witness against you k. You say "I think therefore I am", I say "I am, therefore I think"

  • "Anyone who denies the law of non-contradiction should be beaten and burned until he admits that to be beaten is not the same as not to be beaten, and to be burned is not the same as not to be burned." - Avicenna (Ibn Sina)

  • You remind me of O'Brien from orwell's 1984, k. Reply in kind if you like momentarily, idk... So, I can't objectively state one is sitting? Reality,a rounded perception? Let me be concise: NO. You in denial or insane. Ass+chair=sit. Thats the equation, no rounding. Blue = a measured spectrum & I abandoned relativistic perception theory crap musing in grade school! Didn't need a professor tell me How to think either, but they're the smart ones. Nothing's New only unknown or mistaken. Pi^e

  • lolhat

  • (Note, read the comments from below to above? in order)

    Now that's not much of a problem - because the difference is just slight.

    But as you probably know, the more you work with a rounded number, the bigger the difference will get. And everything we have ever discovered is just that. A rounded number. And unless we always keep that danger in mind, and remain openminded and careful - especially with our lifes at stake - we have a good chance of messing everything up.

  • How specious can you Be? Everyone in the Universe can applaude your ask, seems they all are, But if you don't believe you were 100% sitting in a chair, listen closely, You,Are,RETARDED! And who CARES what vegetable the alleged candle is its True for Everybody it is that substance, ignorance of knowledge is irrelevant! It is What it is. Welcome to reality and the Law of NonControduction. Its not unusual you pass a LIE(candle) to prove facts aren't discernable? Dangerous presumptuous fool!

  • Well, you certainly don't seem to understand a lot of things. First, we cannot know if you sit in a chair or not. We can judge that based on our perception, wether a person sits in a chair or not. But that's just our perception, not reality. It's true that things are the way they are, but how we perceive them doesn't naturally have to be the way they really are. Nor can we ever be sure that something we know or believe to be true, is actually true. We can only say that it's likely to be true.

  • So first: reality exists, but for us, it's always just perception and a estimated guess of how likely our perception might be true. Remember, as far as we know, we can only perceive 3 Dimensions and everything we see and perceive is just the interpretation of our brain.

    One example:

    Is the color blue, blue for everyone?

    Well, of course, you might say, because everyone would say the sky is blue.

    But isn't that what we get thought, what we learn?

    Describe the color blue.

  • (Note, read the comments from below to above in order)

    Now write down the description of any color and ask someone else to describe another color. Red, Yellow or Green for example.

    Then compare the descriptions.

    I'm sure you will see that this doesn't work to find out wether we all perceive blue as blue.

    A child that sees blue as red will still learn the sky is blue, and it will call the red sky it sees a "blue sky" and it will describe the red it sees, as the blue someone else sees.

  • (Note, read the comments from below to above in order)

    Now that is one simple example of how limited our perception of reality is.

    Why is that important you ask?

    Well, because while we always base our conclusions or our knowledge on something rational and logical, we can only try to get close to the "truth".

    Now if the "truth" would be a number, for example 0.87125, what we do is, we round the number. We make 0.87125 = 1, and a few years we realize that while close...

  • (Note, read the comments from below to above in order)

    it's more like 0.9, and then years later we discover that 0.87 is more accurate. And it continues that way. We get closer, but due to our limited perception, we will never ever be able to be absolutely certain that what we estimate is right.

    I'm fairly sure you know what happens when you round numbers in a big equation and split it into multiple operations. You don't get the right result.

  • Your still sitting in a chair Dumbass.RRRRR you just elaborated on what sitting in a chair constitutes. This kind of modern relativistic crap just gives pretentious idiots an excuse to ignore reality. Electron my fist.

  • Science and God mix PERFECTLY you know folks :)

    get it? u will.

  • Mythology is imagination. There is too much detail in the Bible to be mythology. It is a history book, confirmed by different people through generations of eye witnesses of the fulfillment of God's promises, good or bad.

    Science is an inferior study since it does not truly create, but seeks to explain what it sees... space travel, under-sea exploration, medical technology are efforts to understand how we are destroying ourselves.

  • Sorry, but your post shows just how ignorant you are. There were people who swore to see the Greek/Roman/Egyptian/Pastafari­an/Hindu/etc gods, and most have a pretty good history of the world too...

    Science is an inferior study? to what? why study anything if you know it already?

    Never created anything? How do you explain modern tech? none would be possible w/o science (unless you INSIST on remaining in the dark ages where religious dogma persecuted anyone trying to improve our way of life)

  • The goal is a garden paradise lifestyle. That is no threat to anyone and it solves world problems of pollution, climate change-global warming fears, reoccurring financial crisis, war, immigration,.etc. The employment lifestyle must be replaced with a garden paradise lifestyle. It is the only sustainable solution. Lift up this truth to end pollution of air, land, water, food, and overcome all evil. God promises rain in due season to the obedient, but many terrors for not.  Leviticus 26

  • God is merely mythology.

  • join The Zeitgeist Movement:

    watch?v=WnK5mBCFTMg

  • You just ate a candle O_O

  • Listen man oils is out dated buy 50 Years their has been tech to replace for the last 40 yeasr the only thing thats holds us back from moving forward to new forms of energy other then oil is greed by Big Business IT IS THAT SIMPLE their is to much thought on this subject its a waste of time the solution is o=in front of us we just have to move the dollar signs out the way

  • Gee, could this global warming boondoggle just be a tool for marxists to take control of the means of production, thus turning the world into global communism?

    Today is July 9th and the surfers here in San Diego are wearing their WET SUITES because the water is sooo cold. Normally those wet suites would have been hung up in the closet in mid May and taken out again sometime in early October

  • everybody should think like this guy

  • 100% agreed!!!!

  • so that's the answer to global warming!!!!! WE NEED MORE PIRATES!!!! ARRRRGGG!

  • The problem with all this is that Greg is saying: Science is so uncertain, you have to leave it to the "experts" so you know what to believe. This ignores the plain truth that *ALL* of the scientists that subscribe to global warming that made predictions a decade ago, are wrong.  Their most basic predictions about inevitable warming have been incorrect (we have been cooling over the last 10 years, not warming).

    Moral of the story: Check your scientists ability to predict before you trust

  • "We have been cooling over the last 10 years"

    Simply false. Please provide a source. 2005 was the warmest year since records began (in the 1860's) and 2007 the second warmest tied with 1998. Source: Nasa GISS surface temperature analysis. Google it, I can't provide a link here. You can also search "NASA 2005 warmest year" for an article on NASA's website.

  • And just how out of touch with reality and lacking of common sense can you be to make a statement like "ALL of the scientists that subscribe to global warming are wrong" and imply that they've somehow OVERLOOKED the fact that we've been "cooling over the last 10 years" (which isn't true).You don't have ANY EDUCATION or ANY EXPERTISE on the subject yet you can make an absolute statement asserting that almost the entire scientific community is WRONG and you've magically found out the truth.Absurd!

  • If you enjoyed this video, you may be interested in a blog of mine, which has to do with how climate change relates to issues such as credibility and risk management. It's been doing quite well and I'd love to spread these logical ideas around.

    Link on my profile page, or Google "climatesight" (one word). Thanks!

  • the facts:

    Check out this graph:

    live search this:

    Is Global Warming on the Wane?

    How Solar Goes Polar

    found on farmers almanac page.

    mean temp. increase over last centry:

    about 1 deg F

  • He is right about how we tend to start with a belief and then move to evidence but it's dam hard to do otherwise and form an opinion in this world with a media that forces one opinion only down our throats and calls you a nutter if you question them. I think its right to say we should be lloking for alternatives to oil but what no-one is focused on is why and what they will be. We should not limit the use of oil. We should make a form of energy free to all like geo thermal

  • eatin' the candle was just great! I'm still laughin'.

  • he bought the scam. He will eat his words when the hoax is exposed.

    He thinks 9-11 was real.

  • I laughed hysterically when he started eating the "candle".

  • so kinda in that vid wot ur saying is u need evidence to back up ur evidnce or sumtin i dunno its all confussing :S

  • Hey there everyone,

    I have a blog which deals with a lot of the same stuff as How it All Ends - credibility, risk management, and how climate change is portrayed in the media. I'd love for you all to check it out.

    Link on my profile page, or Google "climatesight". Thanks!

  • What the normal one calls a nerd is a scientist

  • Why, in one of your other videos, you turned off comments......coward.

  • Maybe he was tired of getting unwarrented and harsh criticism, like you;re delivernig now. You're acting like a coward yourself; pointing out others' flaws to hide your own.

  • Because idiots like you will tend to put irrelevant critics like you just did. If you were so concern in him turning off the comments, why not just putting it here than saying his a coward. You are an idiot; that is worse

  • This is mad scientist insanity,I believe most people this smart are created with a dash of A.D.D. to prevent such objective thinking.

  • im smart and a straight A student but not a nerd and I wasnt talking about you

  • No worries.

  • nerds

  • I'm quite proud of being a nerd, thanks.

  • Q: can't u place enough force on the magnets causing them to touch? cause i feel my ass sitting on this chair or is it impossible to over power the electron force(resistance)??i'm not an expert or novice in the field of atoms or molecular properties but i can push 2 magnets together with enough force to over power the polarity push...idk just curious

  • I not scientist like you guys. I just dumb pig farmer from Ukrane. But it seem to me that chair is just matter and butt is matter and the feeling you are getting is maybe like gravitational force and homosex like electrons trying to invade bunghole. if eletrons force totally over come then bunghole and chair become one and when you arise chair and bunghole are stuck together maybe like when you sit on nasty thing. I like this guy and want to wear hat like that to my graduationing cermonal.

  • Your nerves aren't sensitive enough to feel a repulsion at the atomic level. Atoms are very, very small. You aren't really levitating off your chair; there's just some degree of repulsion there.

    You CAN push two magnets together if you use enough force too counteract the electromagnetic force. Electrons will always repel other electrons, but electrons can move through most materials somewhat freely. Atoms and the particles which form them can move.

  • Part 2: In computing we have a term GIGO (Garbage In Garbage Out) Much of the data, in the temperature record is crap. NASA runs these complex algorithms on this crap. So tell me if your data is crap and analysis is complex, what do you get? Crap. It has been shown in the past decade or so that NASA has virtually not quality control on its data. It runs analyses on data from a lab never checking the source. And I am supposed to believe them because they are the "experts."