@aikiboy1111111 I'm pretty confident the sampling methodology implied in these psi tests are adequate enough to tests ESP/Psychokinesis, despite the fact that the selection of targets are based on Java.math algorithms. Why? Well, I conducted a Two-tailed T-Test of the die in Psychokinesis Championship with a total of 5,160 tosses and 864 sixes and my statistical calculation (z=0.13 P=0.89) shows no evidence of sampling bias whatsoever which makes it a genuine PK test...
@UncommonSense777 Speaking of that psychic test from psychic.com.au, I just recently took one and I got 9 hits out of 16 trials and according to my own two-tailed, statistical analysis (z=2.16 p=0.030), it showed evidence, yet I only guessed......
Yep, that test in that website (Not the one here in psychic science) is fucked up.....
As a statistician and a critiquer in scientific and parapsychological studies, This ESP Test is the only genuine, legitimate experiment that I know of in the Internet...
Unlike the other online ESP Tests crap, this test uses genuine, valid statistics to measure the degree of evidence for ESP/Psychokinesis, good randomization method, and excellent controls against cheating by magicians...
Actually, this is an actual esp test published by a website. Thing is I'm not sure if the pseudorandom test it is based on is adequate for the testing procedures. (Though the blind option does compensate.)
@aikiboy1111111 I'm pretty confident the sampling methodology implied in these psi tests are adequate enough to tests ESP/Psychokinesis, despite the fact that the selection of targets are based on Java.math algorithms. Why? Well, I conducted a Two-tailed T-Test of the die in Psychokinesis Championship with a total of 5,160 tosses and 864 sixes and my statistical calculation (z=0.13 P=0.89) shows no evidence of sampling bias whatsoever which makes it a genuine PK test...
IceAges14Aces 1 month ago
@UncommonSense777 Speaking of that psychic test from psychic.com.au, I just recently took one and I got 9 hits out of 16 trials and according to my own two-tailed, statistical analysis (z=2.16 p=0.030), it showed evidence, yet I only guessed......
Yep, that test in that website (Not the one here in psychic science) is fucked up.....
IceAges14Aces 4 months ago
Excellent ESP Test!!!
As a statistician and a critiquer in scientific and parapsychological studies, This ESP Test is the only genuine, legitimate experiment that I know of in the Internet...
Unlike the other online ESP Tests crap, this test uses genuine, valid statistics to measure the degree of evidence for ESP/Psychokinesis, good randomization method, and excellent controls against cheating by magicians...
IceAges14Aces 4 months ago
I am looking for someone interesting to make experiment on my brain. I can us telepathy, it works up to few kilometer all the time and 100% correct.
VinkoRajic 4 months ago
Comment removed
IceAges14Aces 8 months ago
your site tells how to be a fraudulent reader.
asshole.
JennelleBelle 1 year ago
@JennelleBelle You cannot prove that.
astrolifter 1 year ago
boring
Lexmark117 2 years ago
Actually, this is an actual esp test published by a website. Thing is I'm not sure if the pseudorandom test it is based on is adequate for the testing procedures. (Though the blind option does compensate.)
aikiboy1111111 2 years ago
You got this from a video on BBC Three's webiste didn't you
KENNEDY456 2 years ago
Im Pretty Sure He Did. Cuz It Is Just The Same . But The BBC Is Better :P
moemin 2 years ago