Added: 4 years ago
From: idomineo
Views: 2,457
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Total BS -- any witnesses were only paid performances by actor shills. Most if not all images of "victims" were the result of computer generated cloning.

    The cloned smoke, even the planes which the news media disseminated on 911 were fake too. Everything you think you know is a lie.

    septemberclues . info

  • it's not clear he considered the obvious [achem's razor] into his own analysis which would be done by modeling the steel being CUT at those points [rather than the violent snap it does in his simulation] by demolition-stuff.

    it's not clear that his simulation was verified by eyewitness testimony or physical materials, e.g., the buckling of the floors would have been noticeable, did anyone?

  • they dont analyze with a second party [they being the bbc which is highly in cahoots with governmental PEOPLE] what data was put into the simluation

    it's not clear how good the program is

    it's not clear his program explains the collapse of the entire building

    it's not clear that he modeled damage to the building

  • No silly, the fireproofing, Asbestos, did not necessarily have to be there, that you're right about. but the events of the day do not include steel being raised to temperatures that weakened the building sufficiently at that point of impact to allow the top to break right off. wait, the whole building fell. hmm. so the bottom strong part was iradicated. but how ? hmm... lets ask questions.. oh i'm not allowed to, off to Guantanamo bay even though I'm a citizen the law allows the pres to do it!

  • listneing to the narrator voice i knew, right away and i might be told wrong, after i watch it, ubt i know this is going to be pro-govt versio nof the story

  • I recommend reading the companion feature article in BCC News, 24th April 2007: "A new kind of fire fighting".

  • Nice intellectual dialogue from the females

  • oh si! this professor is oh-so hot Hot HOT!!! I live in the place of his Alma Mater - I know when he visits as I see the flames of his aura - they are so bright they light the streets of Berkeley!

  • I heard his wife is even hotter than him if you can believe that !!! EMG

  • This guy is HOTT !!! I'm sure he's married to a MODEL !!! EMG !!!

  • Fire Mumbo Jumbo ??? Lives will be saved by this hot but hot but HOT profesor !!! Know what I meat ??? he is peruvian...I believe i saw him surfing near Linse just last month...a trail of fire blazing behind him !!! EMG !!!

  • I dont know much about this fire mubo jumbo but I DO know that Professor TORERO is hott !!!

  • It's wonderful that we have experts like Senor Torero to help keep us safe... Not only is his work exceptional, but he is pretty pretty pretty pretty PRETTY PRETTY HAWT !!! no wonder he's in fire protection....

  • "metal Truss Construction" is responsible for hundreds, (now thousands), of fire fighter deaths. This is a known fact.

  • Heat of burning fuel was never calculated in the testing of the towers when built. Sure the building could withstand a direct hit. But its aftermath wasn't. And with toer 2 falling 1st made the most sense, since it was hit many floors lower than the 1st tower. Several floors were knocked out from the direct hit. So much more stress placed on all floors above and below the impact. Morons dont equate this as its to simplistic.

  • @troglodyt33 & spoonog, probably you don't understand the model they're working with. What you see in the model is only the floors of ONE SECTION OF THE BUILDING and not the whole building. The left part of the floors is connected to the facade and the right one to the core. The model was made to see how the floorplates stressed the facade not how the building exactly collapsed. So please, next time watch it more carefully before you start shouting

  • How come his computer models dont display the CORE of the towers.Besides the floors below the fires were not over heated and therefore were not under the same stresses and would have behaved in a differet way sorry guy whoever you are you got it wrong.Try putting in a core next time oh and by the way did you do a simulation for how much time it would take for your model of the building to hit terra firma.

  • They tested the WTC firewall by shooting five shotgun shells into a steel beam with fireproofing, what a great scientific result from the 9/11 commission. Just research in the history of man how many modern concrete & steel framed buildings have actually totally collapsed like WTC1, 2 & WTC7 (Building 7). And Computer models can be adjusted to "fit" the required result.

  • The "expert" seems to have missed the core in his "model".

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more