Pantsir-S1

[grivsfor]

Stop pizdung.

Good system tbh, and it can shoot down a Predator B, GlobalHawk, F-15, F-22,F-35, B2 bomber, B-1B Bomber.

[frenchfrys12]

Good system tbh, but it cannot shoot down a Predator B, GlobalHawk, F-15, F-22,F-35, B2 bomber, B-1B Bomber, or a sattelite. Best against helicoptors and the old A-10.

[cmdrnmartin]

@frenchfrys12

Uhhh, citation needed, because it can toast most of those that you mentioned.

[frenchfrys12]

@cmdrnmartin Thank you for being calm. But how far can a hellfire go? 5+ miles. How far can a top secret missle launched from a F-35 go? 105 miles. Can the radar penatrate stealth? Can it withstand a entire payload of cluster munitions or a MOAB? K then..

[cmdrnmartin]

The best A/G weapon a JSF can carry is the AGM-84H, and that's a bit of a stretch. That is the only 150mile air to ground weapon that I know of capable of being carried on small aircraft. But that's 3/4 of a million dollar missile, so its a waste on anti-tank ops. And yes, Radar can penetrate F-22/35 stealth, easily. The MOAB or cluster argument is invalid, the launching aircraft wouldn't get close enough to use it.

[frenchfrys12]

I've never heard that the Pantsir has low frequency radar. Stealth does work proven in Iraq. And yes it's worth taking out the S400's anti-stealth radar because then we can fly right over you and drop A FUCKING 2000 LB BOMB ON YOUR AA BATTERIES.

[IAmOpenMinded]

@frenchfrys12 Your logic makes no sense. To take out an anti stealth radar like you call it, you can only use the very same weapons that these new generation Russian AA systems are meant to counter in the first place. HARMS, JDAMS, and cruise missiles are now very vulnerable to quick, and accurate interceptions, so the means won't achieve the aims.

[ILTUSU]

Amazing defence system. It's not only to protect Russian troops but this baby and the Tunguska wich the Pantsir will replace in time also protect the bigger SAM systems like BUK, TOR, S-300 and S-400. Nothing compares to Russian Air defence systems.

[10713412]

i need to buy one for the birds taking a crap on my car

[Jimderkaisser]

....this video is a huge propaganda..the ADATS is better than the Crotale and also more modern.

[alongthebluff]

at least Crotale doesn't not have the ability to engage ground target during emergency situation. (Please correct me if I am wrong)

[ultima3210]

Can these things engage the AGM-88E Harm or is it just for low flying choppers and aircraft?

[clouster75]

Yes, it can even engage AA rockets. Other words it's can engage everything in range.

[andreyRUS17]

3:50 this is answer on your question

i watched about this weapon

it's amazing

[gosciu555]

Yeah of course, especially helicopters. The idea behind the design is to win a shoot out with an attack helicopter or CAS plane.

[kaktuscar86]

СВАКА ЧАСТ РУСИ, ПОЗДРАВ ИЗ СРБИЈЕ!!!!!!

we could've used those in '99.

[ONLYHSV]

russians definitely have the best AA weapns these days.

imagine an area covered by these babies, tor-m1 and s-300 / 400

[breg77]

Deploying these systems around Israel's borders would finally bring peace to the region.

[rossviktor]

мне нравится у панцыря возможность буксируемого стационара установка на крыше дома или например АЭС очень переспективно !

[jufkujgjgu]

Комплекс разрабатывается по заказу, для вооружения одной из арабских стран, чем обусловлен выбор шасси. Первоначальный вариант комплекса был отвергнут заказчиком и отправлен на доработку в связи с полным несоответствием заявленным характеристикам.

[jufkujgjgu]

В ближайшие 5 лет приятие на вооружение и поставка в ВС РФ не планируется. Для сведения: по данным МО РФ в настоящее время 85%, по данным ЦРУ США - 75% истебителей МиГ-29 непригодны к дальнейшей эксплуатации.

[GanzRUS]

Жестокая правда... Ещё несколько лет, и будут летать только те 12 мигов, которые недавно поступили по случаю срыва контракта...

[265Spike]

никакая это не правда, непригодны около 40%, и они поддлежат восстановлению. Алсо панцырь ещё недоделан, такчто не пизди про поставки, минобороны уже заинтересовалось.

[HEKOT77]

Уважаемые работники КБП,

почему в фильме про Панцирь С1 показывают Тунгуску? (2:50)

[prtiejr]

Это Панцирь С1 на гусеничном шасси.

[HEKOT77]

Это тунгуска. У неё СОЦ совсем другая. У Панциря ФАР, у Т. зеркало. Кроме того, Панцирей зелёных нет.

[SAMTOMAS]

i think the apache has no chance it can get fucked from 30km away.lol

[shudra14]

it modern and effective

[SLOWOLITUS]

Эхх... Сербам бы таких агрегатов, да поболее! От албанцев защищать Косово и Метохию

[Abanamat85]

Ниче ниче, Сербы еще всем дадут о себе знать, и Албанцев и Хорват на место поставят!

[SLOWOLITUS]

дай то бог!

[HEKOT77]

К сожалению, это реклама. Сиречь враньё.

[HEKOT77]

Кто мой коммент заминусовал, спросите у КБПшников, где сейчас Панцири, предназначенные Эмиратам и почему...

[NewbieGuide]

i wanna buy one to shoot ducks on country side

[JediMegafrag]

lol :)

[HEKOT77]

I don't know about ducks, but guls are visible with it's thermovision camera. :)

[AbsoliteZero]

LOL. Not many people know that Russians using 4 targets not planes but missles, that means that even SAAM-9/MZRK75 even nowadays can easely oblitirate 95% of USAF planes.I'm not talking of thoese freaky S-300/400 and many more,theese is part of Mobile Strategic Missle Defence System MSMDS. AWESOMe and GRUESOME in same way.

[obender71]

The missile is extraordinary lightweight for the performances in range, speed and power of warhead.

[MyTerrain]

Good stuff, Serbs need it now.

[Tsagia]

Heck yeah!:P

[tramvaj12]

@MyTerrain We need most of this kind things. But until we had US government controlling us we will not have anything.

[agore308]

Can someone tell me why America spends so much more on defense than Russia but is lagging almost an entire generation behind in missiles? The tomahawk is shit compared to the Brahmos and there is nothing the US has that compares to the Pantsir s1 or the s-400.

[mikgazine]

It's Because US AA Fokus only on the Missiles Seek Force, and US AA material is more light than the Soviet SPAAG. But the real power of US AA is Direct Figter Combats.

[Abanamat85]

Why does America spend so much on defense? Are you serious? Because of the enormous navy, the military commitments in the middle east (Iraq, Afghanistan), the bases all over the world, f-22, f-35, research into new weapons and systems (rail gun, bigdog, stealth, etc)

[Abanamat85]

Oh, and also because money paid to military contractors, this is done differently in the states. Perhaps not as efficiently, and way overpriced. That's a bad thing for the american tax payer. Eisenhower warned about the dangers of the military industrial complex.

[Abanamat85]

AND also because US apparently doesn't currently NEED such systems - their airforce. Neither does Russia really, but it sells very well to smaller countries, especially the ones that are not friends of the West, who dont have powerful defense industries, and therefore need these systems. Russia is and was one of the few willing to sell them.

[Abanamat85]

So they have much more experience in development, fielding, and combat history. That's why these Russian systems are better. Восток дело тонкое.. ;)

[mikgazine]

The king of Flakpanzer my friend, now Russian have a real answer for US Air Force...

Its the A10 equivalent on the ground!

[bittemeinrammstein]

lol man they are both Russian so who cares... Russian weapons always best brother! ;)

[basajobo]

among the best in the world, if not the best in it^s class. I think is good that exist a balance in military power, and RUSSIA gives that balance against USA. Nobody has the right to domain others countries with military press. there is just one human race, and then why all this destruction power...?ah...you know this is envy, hungry for power and this power translated in resources control and again obtain power with these resources and mantain the chain

[aleksandarkomlj]

America and Russia are Pervers,make a Profite whit selling of weapons ! Global Imperialism is Pervers.Long Live INDIA,BALKAN and AFRICA,

Down whit degenerick FAT Americans and Drunk Russians.Long live Freedom of Natural Nations.

Death to Syntetic way of Life!!!

[sim0b]

ha! soon russia will be under the control of the usa and great britain economically. russia and china will lose if a conventional war breaks out. Long live the usa!

[ruskie18]

Its a modified Tunguska.

[Roma515]

The most important that the machine is at war itself, without participation of the person. The person authorizes for defeat of the purpose.

[rusak24]

what kind of chassie is that?

[Maloross]

Belorussian made GM352.

[ete0]

Tunguska shoots other rockets, on a distance at 2-3 times smaller then an opportunity of work in movement. Except for that wheel the chassis give the advantages.

[asdbsasd]

If it would be in iraq, war would not be

[Ales988]

this is better than anything:)

[jcng5]

how much does it cost per system?

[gorf1]

About 15 mln $