Of course it matters, who News Reporters voted for, if Wolf Blitzer voted 10 elections in a row for a Democrat, then stop telling me CNN is objective. If he was 50/50 or 60/40 or 70/30 then I would know he's not an idealogue.
It's not what they report. It's what they ignore. It's easy to tell who most of these people voted for. They are nothing but cheerleaders for the left.
Ms. Brzezinski's remarks on journalistic ethics lack professionalism as much as for what they imply. Sure, "every journalist" has a political affiliation and voted for someone. That doesn't mean flaunting it makes their output any better. It would clutter their reporting if I'd know or they make me aware of their views. Professional journalists should be able to retain those personal inclinations and save them for talk shows. Or just call it 'views channel' instead of 'news channel'.
The Mainstream Media has been wholeheartedly in the TANK for the Democratic Party for the last 30 years. Just compare their savagery against GWB and Dick Cheney and especially Sarah Palin, compared to their shameless kid glove treatment of Obama, John Kerry, JOHN EDWARDS, etc etc etc etc.
Very surprising honest. And you can be sure that there is a gropup of extreme leftists who had honest liberals like Mika because there goal is not a search for truth they belive they own the truth and to continue to search for it is a distraction from all the good they have to give the world.
I like Mika's motivations but I don't agree with her approach. I want reporters to simply present the news. That means I don't care what their opinions are, nor do I want to hear them tell me what someone said; I want to hear from the person who said it. An ideal broadcast would have as little video and narration of the journalist as possible, and as much actual footage of the events as available. The vast majority of media in the US has confused fact with opinion, and journalism with gossip.
@94dgrif I don't want a dull NPR-like cable news system. They would have no ratings. Objective news is fine, but there should also be a place you can go for partisan news.
@FromThatShow Well sure and those are Gossip, Comedy and Talk Shows. For it to be considered news I don't want to find the reporter appearing on any of those other three show types (ie blending the line between them). We currently have reporters/political commentators state their personal opinions as an editorial during a news show, only for other reporters to then cite those opinions with a journalistic cop-out phrase like "Some people are now saying that ....".
@94dgrif I agree that those are cop outs. I disagree that reporters should not state their opinions. I just think that Fox news needs to come out as conservative propaganda, and MSNBC needs to come out as liberal propaganda. Then everything would be right with the universe.
@davidheffron That's what people do online. People don't care about facts. They search out whatever information they WANT to find. It's just the way it is. You can't force people to accept fact.
Mika is not so liberal. Also, isn't obvious why the media tends to be more liberal? I mean, they are more educated and better-informed about world affairs.
That tends to make people have more ...liberal world views. It's just less brain dead.
Mika is very intelligent and honest. My biggest problem with her is she is about as uptight as you can get. Socially, sexually and in every other way. Bring up ANY subject of "social controversy" and watch her lock up and become extremely upset.
This is one of the worst ideas I've heard a pundit articulate in quite some time. Nobody expects reporters to not have political views or strong opinions. They only expect them to report on the news objectively from both sides. And if the world is dominated by liberal leaning reporting that's only because reality in recent times seems to have a liberal bias, as Colbert stated so poignantly back in his infamous correspondents dinner roast of the mainstream media and the Bush administration.
I absolutely agree wth her - I can't stand news organizations which pretend they are independent. No one is independent, everyone has a view. Everyone has an agenda.
Apparently it has not occurred to Mika that the content of the mass media might depend more on the economic interests of the people who own them than on the political leanings of the people who work for them.
Still, though, the owners inject their views into the views of the workers. By disclosing the truth behind the slant, hopefully this can allow viewers to form their own opinions accordingly. While what she's admitting is not particularly innovative, it is something the media continues to struggle with regardless of who's in power. A slant to either political party is damaging to the media as a whole because it suggests an air of superiority, something that was never intended.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@Snoopies622 Of course it has--there's just no EVIDENCE to support that bizarre theory. Why do you think human rights abuses in Chile recieved 8 times more coverage than the Holocaust in Cambodia from 1975 to 1979?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@Snoopies622 What a total lie. If your li'l hypothesis is correct, how do you explain the 4 years of CONSTANT UNRELENTING MEDIA HATRED towards GW Bush??? The blatant media lynching of Sarah Palin????? Their hatred towards Ronald Reagan, Dick Cheney, Dan Quayle, Rumsfeld, Condoleeza Rice, etc etc etc etc etc etc ????
@Snoopies622 you mean it PAYS to be liberal???? So why has NY times subscription rates plummeted since 2000? Why does Fox News DESTROY CNN and MSNBC combined? Why is talk radio always more profitable than the liberal newspapers?
Please spare me. Get your facts right. The mainstream media is liberal because THEY ARE liberal. Deal with it
@newt0830 The NY Times, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, talk radio, liberal newspapers, etc. are all part of the mainstream media, and they are all owned by and represent powerful economic interests. Forget the distinction between "liberal" and "conservative", since both sets of positions are created by the owners of society for their own purposes.
Excellent. Fully agree. Individuals can never be trully objective, but they can at least state their idealogy honestly, so the viewer has context for their comments.
While Mika is telling us nothing we don't know, the unfortunate truth of the matter is that her dream of media honesty is never going to happen. If the people knew the true nature of liberalism, the true bias in the industry, and the fact that all of the reporting is left-leaning, the industry would complete its collapse, and the New Media would become the new media of choice. Of course by not admitting their bias, they are simply delaying the inevitable.
Of course it matters, who News Reporters voted for, if Wolf Blitzer voted 10 elections in a row for a Democrat, then stop telling me CNN is objective. If he was 50/50 or 60/40 or 70/30 then I would know he's not an idealogue.
jfan2000jfan 2 months ago
Why is it liberal or left wing to support a welfare state that is minimal compared to European welfare states?
American Democrats are centrists.
Murmillo1 3 months ago
shes part of it1!
newt0830 4 months ago
It's not what they report. It's what they ignore. It's easy to tell who most of these people voted for. They are nothing but cheerleaders for the left.
frogsoda 4 months ago
Ms. Brzezinski's remarks on journalistic ethics lack professionalism as much as for what they imply. Sure, "every journalist" has a political affiliation and voted for someone. That doesn't mean flaunting it makes their output any better. It would clutter their reporting if I'd know or they make me aware of their views. Professional journalists should be able to retain those personal inclinations and save them for talk shows. Or just call it 'views channel' instead of 'news channel'.
Kikrokos 7 months ago
The Mainstream Media has been wholeheartedly in the TANK for the Democratic Party for the last 30 years. Just compare their savagery against GWB and Dick Cheney and especially Sarah Palin, compared to their shameless kid glove treatment of Obama, John Kerry, JOHN EDWARDS, etc etc etc etc.
03185212345 9 months ago
Very surprising honest. And you can be sure that there is a gropup of extreme leftists who had honest liberals like Mika because there goal is not a search for truth they belive they own the truth and to continue to search for it is a distraction from all the good they have to give the world.
IamtheBurceDickenson 9 months ago
I like Mika's motivations but I don't agree with her approach. I want reporters to simply present the news. That means I don't care what their opinions are, nor do I want to hear them tell me what someone said; I want to hear from the person who said it. An ideal broadcast would have as little video and narration of the journalist as possible, and as much actual footage of the events as available. The vast majority of media in the US has confused fact with opinion, and journalism with gossip.
94dgrif 11 months ago
@94dgrif I don't want a dull NPR-like cable news system. They would have no ratings. Objective news is fine, but there should also be a place you can go for partisan news.
FromThatShow 11 months ago
@FromThatShow Well sure and those are Gossip, Comedy and Talk Shows. For it to be considered news I don't want to find the reporter appearing on any of those other three show types (ie blending the line between them). We currently have reporters/political commentators state their personal opinions as an editorial during a news show, only for other reporters to then cite those opinions with a journalistic cop-out phrase like "Some people are now saying that ....".
94dgrif 9 months ago
@94dgrif I agree that those are cop outs. I disagree that reporters should not state their opinions. I just think that Fox news needs to come out as conservative propaganda, and MSNBC needs to come out as liberal propaganda. Then everything would be right with the universe.
FromThatShow 9 months ago
@94dgrif Exactly.
davidheffron 11 months ago
Mika is spineless, she lets Joe be the big boss.
Anyway, the real reason that the media tends to be more liberal (Fox excepted) is that most journalists are well-educated and well-informed.
That does tend to make one less stupid, you know?
libertibelle11 1 year ago
@libertibelle11 Joe is the big boss lol.
FromThatShow 11 months ago
@FromThatShow But what worth is partisan news if all it does is reinforce your particular world view. The you find yourself in an echo chamber.
We're lucky in Britain to have the BBC. I don't belive anything's true untill I hear it confimed by the BBC. How British of me!!
davidheffron 11 months ago
@davidheffron That's what people do online. People don't care about facts. They search out whatever information they WANT to find. It's just the way it is. You can't force people to accept fact.
FromThatShow 11 months ago
@davidheffron I agree with you sir. I am an American and get my world news from BBC America.
metalrod23 7 months ago
Mika is not so liberal. Also, isn't obvious why the media tends to be more liberal? I mean, they are more educated and better-informed about world affairs.
That tends to make people have more ...liberal world views. It's just less brain dead.
libertibelle11 1 year ago
Mika is very intelligent and honest. My biggest problem with her is she is about as uptight as you can get. Socially, sexually and in every other way. Bring up ANY subject of "social controversy" and watch her lock up and become extremely upset.
rfw45 1 year ago
Comment removed
ultraviolet39 1 year ago
This is one of the worst ideas I've heard a pundit articulate in quite some time. Nobody expects reporters to not have political views or strong opinions. They only expect them to report on the news objectively from both sides. And if the world is dominated by liberal leaning reporting that's only because reality in recent times seems to have a liberal bias, as Colbert stated so poignantly back in his infamous correspondents dinner roast of the mainstream media and the Bush administration.
ultraviolet39 1 year ago
I absolutely agree wth her - I can't stand news organizations which pretend they are independent. No one is independent, everyone has a view. Everyone has an agenda.
BluCosmos 1 year ago
thats it i want to mount her now
SHEPARDWISPERER 1 year ago
Honest woman, intelligent woman, and sexy woman! Yeah baby!
Calsummersishere 1 year ago
She is such a douche. If it wasn't for Joe Scarborough she would be unemployed.
mhunt13104 1 year ago
Its not false. You guys just started wit that shit since Obama got elected. It'll be out the window again when a Republican takes over.
Dronetek1 1 year ago
false left/right paradigm
wake up
VoIPpoetry 1 year ago
No, the viewers are stupid and so are you Mike (we know u have a penis). What is this so-called "balance" you want?
U need to balance your slant on intelligence... STFU.... and bake me a pie.
Go back to Russia too, you commie...
GrandPrixAutoGT 1 year ago
Nice work Mika! So true!
oriondt 2 years ago
Apparently it has not occurred to Mika that the content of the mass media might depend more on the economic interests of the people who own them than on the political leanings of the people who work for them.
Snoopies622 2 years ago 17
Still, though, the owners inject their views into the views of the workers. By disclosing the truth behind the slant, hopefully this can allow viewers to form their own opinions accordingly. While what she's admitting is not particularly innovative, it is something the media continues to struggle with regardless of who's in power. A slant to either political party is damaging to the media as a whole because it suggests an air of superiority, something that was never intended.
teasymphony 2 years ago
@Snoopies622 She says the 'objective news networks' ie the ones that try to be balanced
barker505 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Snoopies622 Of course it has--there's just no EVIDENCE to support that bizarre theory. Why do you think human rights abuses in Chile recieved 8 times more coverage than the Holocaust in Cambodia from 1975 to 1979?
EkajTheSwordsman 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Snoopies622 What a total lie. If your li'l hypothesis is correct, how do you explain the 4 years of CONSTANT UNRELENTING MEDIA HATRED towards GW Bush??? The blatant media lynching of Sarah Palin????? Their hatred towards Ronald Reagan, Dick Cheney, Dan Quayle, Rumsfeld, Condoleeza Rice, etc etc etc etc etc etc ????
03185212345 9 months ago
@Snoopies622 you mean it PAYS to be liberal???? So why has NY times subscription rates plummeted since 2000? Why does Fox News DESTROY CNN and MSNBC combined? Why is talk radio always more profitable than the liberal newspapers?
Please spare me. Get your facts right. The mainstream media is liberal because THEY ARE liberal. Deal with it
newt0830 4 months ago
@newt0830 The NY Times, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, talk radio, liberal newspapers, etc. are all part of the mainstream media, and they are all owned by and represent powerful economic interests. Forget the distinction between "liberal" and "conservative", since both sets of positions are created by the owners of society for their own purposes.
Snoopies622 4 months ago 7
Excellent. Fully agree. Individuals can never be trully objective, but they can at least state their idealogy honestly, so the viewer has context for their comments.
MarkB701 2 years ago
While Mika is telling us nothing we don't know, the unfortunate truth of the matter is that her dream of media honesty is never going to happen. If the people knew the true nature of liberalism, the true bias in the industry, and the fact that all of the reporting is left-leaning, the industry would complete its collapse, and the New Media would become the new media of choice. Of course by not admitting their bias, they are simply delaying the inevitable.
douglasvgibbs 2 years ago
Liberal media honesty???? Never happen Mika. Keep dreamin'
kanemasterDJG 2 years ago
wow, surprising honesty.
DronetekPolitics 2 years ago 4