Was this not meant to be launched just before the Fukushima disaster ?? Funny that happening........Whats the bets it will become a sucess ??? 1000:1 odds ???
INVENTORS!!! You MUST go underground, do your own marketing, not to tie up with government. Don't patent your inventions. At least look for an investors and make your simple proven prototype and spread it. This is already proven scientifically by some scientist around the Globe. You MUST UNDERSTAND, this is a BIG THREAT for National Security for OIL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY. Can't get any supportt from them even you have a good intention doin this.
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodynamics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
@DancingHorses26 Indeed. They use a chemical to split water into H and O and which doesn't occur in free nature, but must be produced artificially. That chemical (the energy of production) is the actual fuel!
DON'T MISLEAD PEOPLE LIKE THAT JUST TO SELL YOUR SCAM CRAP!!!
This car is powered by a Fuel Cell System!
Electric motors power the wheels, that get electricity form fuel cells, that consume H produced on board by turning water into hydrogen and oxygen through a chemical reaction, not electrolysis!
@billysgeo so lets break this down, you put water in the electrolysis chamber and use electricity from the battery to split it into hydrogen and oxygen. The Hydrogen is captured and fed into a fuel cell that generates electricity through a chemical reaction. The generated electricity is apparently enough to combat both drains (the electrolysis and the motors running the wheels). Sounds pretty circular to me, apart from adding the water.
Markets wil collapse well the western markets anyway if we didn't need oil anymore. some people don't relise how much economies are dependant on the use of oil
@mattymuck Well considering how much energy is expended to find oil, then drill for it, then refine it to an even usable state, and then transport it... hydrogen just plain is more efficient. Plus if you use solar energy on the car it really makes it a rather viable option to keep developing.
@mnpaintballfreak I wasn't comparing to oil, I was comparing it to using hydrogen as the initial fuel. Better to develop the right infrastructure to isolate and transport hydrogen to use directly as a fuel rather than using alternate energy sources in a car to create hydrogen which will weigh down the car and be highly inefficient. I highly doubt there is enough room on the car to create even near enough energy via PV cells, with what we have now anyways. mass production efficiency > individual
@mnpaintballfreak Also when you are comparing oil to hydrogen, the energy required to seperate h2o is like what 450kj/mol? You also have to transport the hydrogen (assuming we don't have super solar PV cells), which is also dangerous and probably has to be transported under certain conditions? Also when you refine oil, it is not refined only for the specific use of fuel in cars. Many useful products are retrieved.
@mattymuck I have to agree with you, oil is extremely useful in so many products, as well as an energy source. I simply believe that for many city and small car applications I believe that we should continue to develop self sufficient vehicles that run cleanly. Just because it isn't possible now doesn't mean it never will be, I mean who would ever have guessed we would have gone from massive steam driven engines running on ships to small combustion engines in motorcycles.
@mnpaintballfreak Well yes technologies such as solar cells will no doubt improve, however using that energy in order to split water to create hydrogen makes no sense. When you can just run the car with an electric motor directly from the electrical energy generated by the solar cells. In a perfect conversion of energy, the hydrogen would give as much as the solar cells would. This is never the case in real life and you must also take into account the weight of adding more systems.
@mattymuck it actualy dose make sense because there are a billion or so combustion engines right now running cars and they have not stoped making them yet. I worry more about all the crazy rich muslems that will be losing all there oil money. The holy war will be all they have left
Here is a straightforward guidebook named HHO Booster that I have used, and you can make use of to renovate your vehicle to get up to 60 MPG, and enhance your vehicles functioning by more than 65% for 10x cheaper than a hybrid automobile from several kind of car maker literally. Buying HHO Booster is one Of the best decisions I have ever made. Checkout my video and unbiased review of the HHO Booster Guide on my channel in the description of video.
Have any of you researched why we aren't using HHO to run our cars? The answer isn't because we're being dominated by oil producers, it's because HHO requires energy to produce. In fact, it requires more energy to produce then you get back by using. Basic chemistry and physics. Check out the first and second laws of thermodynamics; They're great.
I built an "HHO" generator when I was in the 5th grade. I built another one when I was a high school sophomore, measuring both energy input and output. That was when I knew for sure that "HHO" engines were a scam. It ALWAYS takes more energy to split the water than you get back when you recombine it.
xeniavader, You're just lying. PERIOD. LYING. Not just stupid, not just ignorant, you're flat out lying. You have no buddy with a truck running on H2O. Unfortunately, you're also ignorant of the laws of conservation of energy, thermodynamics, etc. This stupid concept doesn't work, has been proven not to work repeatedly and no successful demonstration has ever been made of this technology. If it's so great, why isn't the car on sale somewhere?
@robtice2 hmm, you might want to consider looking up hho generators..they convert water to hho (which is about 100x more explosive then gasoline, and feed it into that tiny engine. Its already been known about for over 100 years. the oil companys and alike dont want you to stop paying for gasoline.... get the drift why these things disappear..
@robtice2 ignorent of laws that are so OLD technology has made them incorrect nowadays.. the law of over unity was broken when permanent magnet alternators hit the market. No it wasn't possible before that (unless you had 8 bloody alternators on your engine, then it would be weight killing it.. lol
my hho drycell feeds a 3.5hp lawmower engine, it takes 180 watts to generate... the permanent magnet alterntor its spinning is putting out 2kilowatt.... I dont see how it doesn't work :-\
a buddy of mine up-fitted his truck to run solely on H20. Works great, you'd never know your were driving with hydrogen. One tank of water is good for 100s of miles. I'm sure the oil companies are doing their best to block this type of technology. High voltage and low amps is what's needed to maximize electrolysis. The required electricity is FAR less than the kinetic energy derived from burned hydrogen. I know this goes again most simple chemical equations. hope this makes it big.
@TheTwony splitting atoms = energy... were just slitting hydrogen and oxygen and feeding it to an engine. DONT EVER split a hydrgen molecule or you and you town/city will have a very bad day. burning hydrogen is harmless, its only leftover is water :-\
Another invention that poofed into thin air. On their web-site, there's a sob story about all the problems they're having bringing their product to market. Sounds like the oil cronies stuck it to them. The oil & gas cronies are in the process of finishing off the planet with their "gas fracking operations" and they don't want anyone throwing a wrench in the works. Especially the part where they throw radioactive & toxic chemical waste into the rivers and streams that supply our drinking water.
@HemiHead66 hho after burned converts back to water on its own.. there are no other emisions, and electrolysis takes 316L stainless and some electricity, dont worry bud, why were trying to replace fossil fuels
@HemiHead66 ~ Since the 60's, municipal water fluoridation has used hydrofluorosilicic acid, a waste byproduct from smoke stacks of aluminum and fertilizer plants, containing 23% sodium fluoride (rat poison), mercury, arsenic, lead, barium, cadmium, palonium 20 and other trace poisons. It's dental cavity prevention claim has never been proven. Water filters can't remove it, regardless of their claims. And, commercial pesticides are fluorides. So, our rivers perpetually poison our oceans.
@stopdemockery Yeah, I know about the fluoride in the water. Whoever came up with the idea to use fluoride to fight cavities must have been a real winner. If you don't take care of your teeth, they're going to rot. And no amount of fluoride will prevent it. They're probably putting that shit in the water for other reasons. I've got my own well, so...
@astrialkil Yes it is about taking care of your teeth. If you think that you can leave all of that crap on your teeth and not have them rot, you're crazy. As far as consumption, you'd have to be real bad with sugar & junk to have it do damage. If you brush your teeth & floss, most people won't have a problem. I eat a lot of sugar and never had much of a problem. All my problems came from not taking the time to get between those molars in the back. Didn't have dental floss when I was young.
@HemiHead66 Umm... where do you get radioactive waste from oil??? You don't. The batteries to run electric cars however are considered toxic enough that they have to be stored in still water pools very similar to spent radioactive waste. Before you start complaining about oil and gas "cronies" start looking at what the real alternatives are first.
@mnpaintballfreak Actually oil contains naturally occuring radioactive materials, a method of finding deposits relies on this. However you make a good point.
@mattymuck You are right that some oil deposits have radon and some radium isotopes however these are not inherently from oil, it is from the soil around the oil. It is really not much different than the radioactive isotopes that are active in the ground around your house. You do have to take precautions with it just like testing for radon in your basement in certain parts of the country.
@HemiHead66 THEY MAKE TRILLIONS A YEAR OFF THEIR GAS MONOPOLY - OF COURSE THEY WOULD NOT WANT ANY 'NEW' TECHNOLOGY GETTING IN THE WAY OF THEIR PROFITS!!!!
STAN MEYER HAD A CAR BACK IN THE 80'S THAT RAN OFF WATER .... HE DIED OF URANIUM POISONING!
I'M NOT SAYING ITS A CONSPIRACY... BUT IF ITS BEEN AROUND SINCE THEY 80'S....... SOMETHING IS QUITE FISHY TO SAY THE LEAST
@peepeevagi brown's gas generator was what? 100 years ago? and proven by the government to work, and was PATENTED ? nope never heard of that one lol ;-)
@peepeevagi exactly the same thing. An electrolysis device that splits water into hydron and oxygen. only 2 ways I know... chemical (aluminium, potassium hydroxide and water) or electrolysis.. lol they're shit outta luck lol
Still, i imagine the Japanese will attempt to take credit for it (They allready whitewash and rewrite their history O.o). And people across the world will believe it D:
It is RIVA electric car..I came across a blow where Hundai did some testing with HHO model and found the mileage is decreased!!! and battery is exhausted...there are lot of people to fraud you selling ebooks...please beware..
@avijit2k8 well, I guess they messed up.. because NASA is looking at it... copy paste this link in explorer..See why hydrogen CAN run any combustion engine the same distance on hyrogen with "gas" tank 3x SMALLER. And yes there will always be fraudulent ppl, doesn't mean it doesn't work. erc.ivv.nasa.gov/vision/earth/everydaylife/apr_zeolite_prt.htm
Dihydrogen Monoxide is another term for water. The only place this type of technology is even feasible is on a submarine. Even there it isn’t energy efficient (requiring more energy to separate the molecules than it even will get from resulting elements) but oxygen is precious on a sub so it is worth it. BTW, the amount of water it would take to produce enough hydrogen to mimic a tank of gas would be equivalent to hauling around a hottub full of water.
@lockdownrocks 30 litre of water is the equivelent eregy of 30 MILLION gallons of gasoline. Albert Einstein
think again bud, Nasa is already proven you'd need 3x LESS ya dont believe it works? fine, pay for fuel for the rest of your life, well, of course, if theres any left by then :-\
@lockdownrocks ah yes I'm reading up on Nasa's tests, apparently its only 3x better then gasoline, hmm, takes 3x less hydrogen to go the attain the same mileage as using gasoline in the seperate trails with 2 identicle engines. cool.
Many people like those on here said light would travel in only a straight line and could not be bent. And no one even thought about the atom 1000 years ago, what history are you reading? As advanced as our "science" is no one understands the basic electron so how can anyone dismiss any new way of looking at the "science" behind HHO? Your skepticism is very typical of someone who believes what they are told and never attempts to reach out and try to disprove it. Open your mind robtice2 !
No one ever claimed you couldn't bend light. Ancient people knew about refraction of light. And, until the concept of an atom was created, no one COULD think about splitting it and once it was thought of (about 1,000 years ago) they thought about splitting it. You need to study some history.
It's not a matter of trust. This system was proven not to work about 100 years ago and it still doesn't work. Trust has nothing to do with it, its just plain mathematics and energy conservation. It simply takes more energy to separate the H2O than you get back when you recombine it. That's the whole ball game.
Big oil is trying to stop you putting dihydrogen monoxide in your petrol tank. THEY KNOW IT RUNS YOU VEHICLE BETTER THAN GAS. but big oil and big government is SURPRESSING THIS FACT with BLACK HELICOPTERS!!!! send me dollars 300 to find out the truf. Don't be fooled sheeple!!!! I will probably be killed for telling you this so I deserve $300 ok!
I find it amazing how so many people who think themselves to be so highly intelligent and educated can be so blind and so brainwashed. Those of you who have made brash comments on here about how this can't work have never, ever put your own sweat into trying to make a difference. This does work and for those who believe that the "math" proves it wont, think again. People thought for years you couldn't bend light but we found a way. We would never split the atom but we did or map DNA...
DiHydrogenMonoxide? Are you guys this stupid? We played these stupid semantics games in Freshman chemistry and laughed our asses off at them, now you want us to take it seriously? No thanks. It was dumb then and it's dumb now.
@robtice2 Is it so hard to trust, I could trust you or this, I choose this until proven undeniably wrong. Innocent until proven guilty. Right until proven wrong, that is my philosophy.
No, it's not. They refuse to allow a test of distance, for example, they refuse any kind of real test at all! The system will work short term, until the battery dies out. Scams of this type have been performed for over 100 years, creating cars that "run" off water, air, all kinds of crap. The simple fact is that anytime you claim to create more power than is available in your system, you're lying. The power required to separate the H &O exceeds the power you get back by recombining it.
you can seperate the hydrogen with an old teacher type hydrogen oxygen gas generator . same container but seprate compartments for negative and possative . one makes hydrogen other makes oxygen . but it takes alot. i mean a looooooot of hydrogen and some small motors are incapable of generating the power needed. but if it can be done who gives a shit about efficency its water . it in the air . so why not elecrolize steam or just plain air. i say hydrogen takes filled with solar created hydrogen
you can seperate the hydrogen with an old teacher type hydrogen oxygen gas generator . same container but seprate compartments for negative and possative . one makes hydrogen other makes oxygen . but it takes alot. i mean a looooooot of hydrogen and some small motors are incapable of generating the power needed. but if it can be done who gives a shit about efficency its water . it in the air . so why not elecrolize steam or just plain air.
why such dumb people comments negatively on this arent they educated or just narrow minded why not keep those big heads with tiny brains on a guillotine and just watch and be happy if this will work theyll benefit on it and the whole world,maybe they are capitalist, the supplier of big oil companies, its not the Japan, China, Europe or american first discover it... its from south east asia who first invented it.
@sparkygl0s i dont question this im more than inspired of trying this kind of technology myself and studying it, im not a chem., engr. but theres nothing to loose if i try it, for me to know if really does work, its like saying salt is salty but you havent tasted it. i just wonder a hundred years ago i think also say man can never fly airplane doesnt work.
@sparkygl0s i dont question this im more than inspired of trying this kind of technology myself and studying it, im not a chem., engr. but theres nothing to loose if i try it, for me to know if really does work, its like saying salt is salty but you havent tasted it. i just wonder a hundred years ago i think they also say man can never fly airplane doesnt work.
Correction. My tentacled sandbox says the culprit is bad code by the password protocol rewriters for Youtube. But your video lacks sound. You need to remove it and remake it, with sound. All these commenting folks who seem to have sound on this video are probably cops watching you and pretending to be honest citizens. Boy are you in trouble. Whatcha got going, an encrypted video or something? Messages from Bin Laden to his rich Aunt asking for a raise in his allowance?
This is fake. So is the comments box. THere is a virus in the video. The video knocks out your sound and Kaspersky eats the virus. I only wish Kaspersky would eat the person who posts this crap.
Unlimited energy sources are out there!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Free yourself!
Water Cars are dangerous to corporate profits and to every international economy.
If we curbed our reliance on fossil fuels, the global economy would come to a grinding halt and currencies would collapse, pushing the world into a new agrarian dark age.
Mining fossil fuels employs tens of millions in the oil exploration, drilling and oil spill cleanup industries.
Without oil, mass unemployment, starvation and global calamity will occur, therefore Water Car technology must be buried and forgotten.
With the addition of batteries for ignition Oomph of the hydrolysis system, the next step in HHO vehicle technology is for the HHO system to hydrolyze the water vapor that naturally exists in the air. Even the driest air still has a minimum of ~1% by volume water in the form of water vapor. Why carry a tank of H2O around when the hydrolysis engine can suck in enough air to obtain it's water vapor? Batteries may be recharged once the HHO engine is in travel mode.
this guy is not to be trusted. he's trying to disguise the fact that HHO is the same has H20. Thats right folks. just put water into your gas tank to achieve the same effect.
@DancingSpiderman no; it's not water it's Dihydrogen Monoxide; that's what I run my car on. Dihydrogen Monoxide is an easily obtained household chemical and it's very cheap; Send me $100 to get my ebook called 200 uses for Dihydrogen Monoxide and $599 for my ebook called How to run your car on Dihydrogen Monoxide. Don't be taken in by big oil. Discover the secrets of Dihydrogen Monoxide today.
@DancingSpiderman Bullshit. HHO is by definition, H2O. It's just a different way of writing it in order to fool chemical idiots. It's like writing ClNa instead of NaCl. Either the people never had basic chemistry or they have forgotten it. PEOPLE, YOU"RE IDIOTS to think HHO isn't H2O. You don't get to make up new rules for how to write chemistry, you know.
For every hundred units of energy released when you burn hydrogen (with oxygen to produce water) it takes a hundred units of energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. Allowing for inefficiencies you'll get a lot less energy out than you have to put in. Thus FAIL!!!
No denying you can burn hydrogen in an engine but it is not efficient at all.
@johnathon124 No, we need a car that runs on idiots. Apparently there are plenty of them and they are excess to the general population. And, they apparently have lots of energy to expend.
Technically that would only stop the shit. The Jew bankers that make all the money off oil through futures trading would cut your gentile balls off and tie your dick in a knot. I have mine tied in a nice bow right now with gas hitting 4 bucks a gallon!
I am surprised we have not declared war on wall street and their crooked lap dogs in Washington DC. It would be over in a day.
@HemiHead66@HemiHead66 The world would have NEVER gotten this far in technology or advancement without fuel oil jackass! Go back to your $12/hr job will ya?
@3TruthSeeker33 Lick my balls, shit for brains, oil was obsolete decades ago. And your dumb-ass don't even know where most of out technology came from.
@3TruthSeeker33 It figures, another Obama birther with his brain filled with Drill Baby Drill propaganda.. What happened to those lower gas prices if we were only allowed to drill more? Even with Obama's moratorium, oil production in the U.S. is at an 8 year high, and that's with 6 million people unemployed. Where's the lower gas prices? You Pubtart idiots will buy anything.
@3TruthSeeker33 Lol you gotta be kidding :) The world far in advancement and technology? NO...we are very far behind my friend. The fact that the world still runs on oil is a very solid proof of that.
@HemiHead66 they already have to several inventors that made thier discoveries public. I say we do this HHO thing anyways and let the OIL companies suffer, fuck those goofs
I'm quite sure I can get a video that shows 10,000 miles per gallon. Why bother faking less? HHO is H2O is water, and this doesn't work. Never has, never will. The energy required to separate the hydrogen from the water exceeds the energy gained by recombining it. You have to be really naive and ignorant of the most elemental science to believe otherwise.
I merely posted a quoted claim and never stated whether it was or not true. HHO and H2O are not exactly the same.
H2O is a one single oxygen atom bonded with two hydrogen atom.HHO is two hydrogen gases with one oxygen gas that are mixed and not bonded. HHO is most commonly used in a torch for welding water is not. I am aware of the engery needed to create HHO and I dont believe that this vehicle does what it claims. However I do believe you dont have a full understanding of basic chemistry.
Chemical notation is not a matter of opinion and I do indeed have a basic understanding of chemistry. HHO and H2O are essentially identical. HHO cannot be "...two hydrogen atoms with one oxygen gas..." I suggest you check out basic standard chemical notation before you post on this subject again. Mixtures have a notational process, by the way and it's not uninterrupted elemental listing.
H2O is not a single atom. It is a molecule comprised of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom.
HHO is not as you claim. Electrolysis of two water molecules produces two molecules of hydrogen (H2) and one molecule of oxygen (O2). Every chemist will tell you that.
@LiamXaoh Learn to read buddy where in my comment did i say H2O is a single atom? Due to the limited character count field I did kind of botch up the point I was trying to make about what HHO is. HHO is not water nor is it a different way of stating H2O. AGAIN LEARN TO READ "H2O is a one single oxygen atom bonded with two hydrogen atom" I ran out of space and neglected to pluralize the word atom but I guess you lack the common sense to figure that out.
@youngn420 This is far beyond chemistry. This is wave field theory. Something about the combination of magnetic waves is causing a hydrogen atom to shift in the molecule... it is still wet, but it burns. A two contact electrolosis does not create the same effect. The energy origin may not be chemical, but it may be there nonetheless.
Many said the same thing about splitting the atom... Until it had a military use =P
At Chernobyl, about 0.05% of the reactor core material was released. The rest remains. The radiation level reached 40 times the lethal level almost instantly, causing death in 2 days to weeks for those exposed at that level. Don't forget there was radiation deaths in the Manhattan Project too. Italy has phased out nuke plants and Germany is to, based on illness rates and hazard analysis. And they use the US style nukes. Nuke is the most expensive power available. double any other.
Just so you know, a full reactor melt down is possible in US style reactor because the emergency water cooling systems have NEVER been tested and an earthquake can destroy the pumps, pipes and/or power to the pumps. Full melt down yields the China Syndrome, meaning the molten core sinks down through the base (nothing can stop it) and into the soil and water table below it. When it hits the water table. there is a Chernobyl style reaction. It would be worse than Chernobyl, much worse.
In case someone never attended school, "HHO" is EXACTLY the same as H2O and means common water. This thing is essentially a fake. Its a hydrogen car, nothing new, with the eternal problem of fuel. The energy required to separate the hydrogen from the water exceeds the energy gained by burning it back to water. There is simply no possible way to gain energy from this system. People been trying it since the discovering water splits into hydrogen and water. It's NEVER worked & doesn't now.
The problem is that EVERY system to separate the hydrogen from the oxygen requires more energy than you get back from recombining it. This simply doesn't work. The math is simple.
@robtice2 The EROEI (energy returned on energy invested) isn't the only thing to take in account. You also have to think of energy portability and energy density of the energy carrier. Since hydrogen is far superior to batteries it could be worth the energy loss.
@ingeborgsjon Actually, it is the only thing you need to take into account. If energy expended exceeds energy output, in a closed system (a car) the deficit means it WON'T WORK. I fail to see that Hydrogen is superior to batteries. The problem is getting the hydrogen using less energy than you get from recombining the hydrogen with something else. When the hydrogen is acquired from an outside source, (Iceland by geothermal) its a winner in terms of cost per unit traveled.
@robtice2 dude, u being flat earth about it. ie: "something doesn't agree with the theory i've got in my head that says how it should be, therefore it can't be true"
@robtice2 Your full of crap...... Stop lying and get a little education before you spout that horse crap.... Stanley Meyer easily got more and so does this one..
My dad is the only one on earth that knows secretes about the smartplug that can run virtually any fuel but it's not his invention and he doesn't own the patent. There are more powerful technologies possible than this dinky car. They want you to believe you have to have tiny lightweight vehicles to make alternative work. Since the dawn of Tesla we have been ripped of free energy. Energy is ample on Earth and easily harness with the right technology, the technology they suppress.
There is not such thing as free energy, according to thermodymics laws, energy is only tranformed from one form into another while loosing energy in the process.
no it's not the guy that made the first water care is named Stan Myers. You can google it here on Youtube and he was killed over it. The Japs stole this technology. My father made the first plane fly without magnetos it's on youtube as well called smartplugs. my dad is only mentioned once by first name "Chuck". It was also a Nasa and military project. My dad quite because he was cheated and he was offered a job with the Skycar also here on youtube but he said it wouldn't work.
Huh, that's pretty interesting. But I have to say- Tesla motors is NOT going to be that big a seller. The cheapest car they sell is $49,900. I don't see too many people buying from them. Zenn shows considerably more promise, with their only apparent flaw being that they're fairly new (only 1 model year), and they don't have very many dealers yet. GM and Ford don't have a lot of hope of surviving that long. I've never heard of Magna before, but their site isn't loading well so I can't learn more.
The point is Big Oil is not crushing these electric cars. We have real practical cars on the road or coming into production soon. Not just test programs like the EV1.
CNET has a news article claiming an equivalent of 230 mpg for the Volt. If you live in an area with cheap electricity (5 cents / KwH) it will cost you about 40 cents to charge the battery overnight. Volt's predicted to cost $40K minus $7.5K US Gov incentive. (CNET's numbers not mine) Expect it on dealers lots late 2010.
In my area this would be close to zero emissions as we're mostly Hydro & Nuclear.
Yeah, I just heard about that today. It sounds pretty good actually (Though $32500 is still a little pricey, not horrible, especially considering the cost of running it, but it is a considerable initial investment).
Also, where do you live anyway? Zero emissions would be nice.
This has been flagged as spam show
An endothermic reaction (electrolysis) is needed to split water into the elements hydrogen and oxygen. Where does that outside energy come from?
The laws of physics are immutable that's the message to all you simple GREENPEACE baffoons that fell for this hoax.
victor9245 2 weeks ago
unveiling a new american car, BURNS TRIPLE THE FUEL!... meanwhile in japan
undertyped1 2 weeks ago
If the technoligy is there to build a tiny car with zero emmissions then it will improve and we all can drive 500 HP cars with zero emmissions
ReNeGaDe800RiDeR 1 month ago
Was this not meant to be launched just before the Fukushima disaster ?? Funny that happening........Whats the bets it will become a sucess ??? 1000:1 odds ???
robertk1968 1 month ago 4
is the sound gone on this video? I can't get any audio.
OzKnosis 1 month ago
see Wiki article: Water-fuelled car
newcome880 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
INVENTORS!!! You MUST go underground, do your own marketing, not to tie up with government. Don't patent your inventions. At least look for an investors and make your simple proven prototype and spread it. This is already proven scientifically by some scientist around the Globe. You MUST UNDERSTAND, this is a BIG THREAT for National Security for OIL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY. Can't get any supportt from them even you have a good intention doin this.
MrManilahomes 2 months ago
Where does the energy for electrolysis come from?
Misery1988 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodynamics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
Thermospecialist 3 months ago
This "technology" is bullshit. It requires *energy* to separate hydrogen from water, people. It doesn't just happen all by itself!
DancingHorses26 4 months ago
@DancingHorses26 do your research b4 you comment and once u do you will realize how stupid you just made urself seem. food for thought
eggbeaters 3 months ago
@DancingHorses26 Indeed. They use a chemical to split water into H and O and which doesn't occur in free nature, but must be produced artificially. That chemical (the energy of production) is the actual fuel!
Thermospecialist 3 months ago
@DancingHorses26
Ok then.. we use an alternator to provide that power.
Still beats the hell out of driving (or walking) to a gas pump.
RooFx 1 month ago
Getting more energy through combining water than it takes to split it.
'Cos fuck thermodynamics.
SingularlyDatarific 5 months ago
What does that have to do with HHO gas???
DON'T MISLEAD PEOPLE LIKE THAT JUST TO SELL YOUR SCAM CRAP!!!
This car is powered by a Fuel Cell System!
Electric motors power the wheels, that get electricity form fuel cells, that consume H produced on board by turning water into hydrogen and oxygen through a chemical reaction, not electrolysis!
billysgeo 7 months ago
@billysgeo so lets break this down, you put water in the electrolysis chamber and use electricity from the battery to split it into hydrogen and oxygen. The Hydrogen is captured and fed into a fuel cell that generates electricity through a chemical reaction. The generated electricity is apparently enough to combat both drains (the electrolysis and the motors running the wheels). Sounds pretty circular to me, apart from adding the water.
Petalpusher28 6 months ago
MAKE THAT QUICK ECOLOGIC RE EVOLUTION QUICK !!! AND FUKUSHIMA
christophezirgle 7 months ago
Can these be purchased in the United States. This would be great.
doughauf 7 months ago
Markets wil collapse well the western markets anyway if we didn't need oil anymore. some people don't relise how much economies are dependant on the use of oil
TheCorruptA 7 months ago
This "invention" was exposed for the fraud it truly is.
Water is not the source of energy at all here.
a1mint 8 months ago
Wasn't this patented by Stan Meyers in the mid 1900's?
InsidiakMFWA 8 months ago
This is invented by filipino.
MultiSimplyCool 8 months ago
ooooh goody lets convert water to hydrogen and use more energy doing that than we get back when converting hydrogen back to water again, brilliant!
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck Well considering how much energy is expended to find oil, then drill for it, then refine it to an even usable state, and then transport it... hydrogen just plain is more efficient. Plus if you use solar energy on the car it really makes it a rather viable option to keep developing.
mnpaintballfreak 8 months ago
@mnpaintballfreak I wasn't comparing to oil, I was comparing it to using hydrogen as the initial fuel. Better to develop the right infrastructure to isolate and transport hydrogen to use directly as a fuel rather than using alternate energy sources in a car to create hydrogen which will weigh down the car and be highly inefficient. I highly doubt there is enough room on the car to create even near enough energy via PV cells, with what we have now anyways. mass production efficiency > individual
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mnpaintballfreak Also when you are comparing oil to hydrogen, the energy required to seperate h2o is like what 450kj/mol? You also have to transport the hydrogen (assuming we don't have super solar PV cells), which is also dangerous and probably has to be transported under certain conditions? Also when you refine oil, it is not refined only for the specific use of fuel in cars. Many useful products are retrieved.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck I have to agree with you, oil is extremely useful in so many products, as well as an energy source. I simply believe that for many city and small car applications I believe that we should continue to develop self sufficient vehicles that run cleanly. Just because it isn't possible now doesn't mean it never will be, I mean who would ever have guessed we would have gone from massive steam driven engines running on ships to small combustion engines in motorcycles.
mnpaintballfreak 8 months ago
@mnpaintballfreak Well yes technologies such as solar cells will no doubt improve, however using that energy in order to split water to create hydrogen makes no sense. When you can just run the car with an electric motor directly from the electrical energy generated by the solar cells. In a perfect conversion of energy, the hydrogen would give as much as the solar cells would. This is never the case in real life and you must also take into account the weight of adding more systems.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck it actualy dose make sense because there are a billion or so combustion engines right now running cars and they have not stoped making them yet. I worry more about all the crazy rich muslems that will be losing all there oil money. The holy war will be all they have left
uawwildbob 7 months ago
@uawwildbob Did you reply to the wrong person? You are talking about something completely different than i was.
mattymuck 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you cant beat them join them and disolve them from within
tubmansolution 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is Stan Meyer's invention using Brown's Gas. It is monotomic gas.
Invented here in the USA in 1997
RonPaulAKAfreedom 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is a straightforward guidebook named HHO Booster that I have used, and you can make use of to renovate your vehicle to get up to 60 MPG, and enhance your vehicles functioning by more than 65% for 10x cheaper than a hybrid automobile from several kind of car maker literally. Buying HHO Booster is one Of the best decisions I have ever made. Checkout my video and unbiased review of the HHO Booster Guide on my channel in the description of video.
HelpingMakeLifeEZ 9 months ago
There you go the reason Japan got HAARP-ed
fullfist 9 months ago
@fullfist
Maybe its time someone dropped a nuke on HAARP.
summer20105707 9 months ago 3
Have any of you researched why we aren't using HHO to run our cars? The answer isn't because we're being dominated by oil producers, it's because HHO requires energy to produce. In fact, it requires more energy to produce then you get back by using. Basic chemistry and physics. Check out the first and second laws of thermodynamics; They're great.
Zink575 9 months ago
now to get a V8 running so we dont look like pussies
Govenator1 9 months ago
@inauspiciousominous troll yourself away
yourpersonalspammer 9 months ago
I built an "HHO" generator when I was in the 5th grade. I built another one when I was a high school sophomore, measuring both energy input and output. That was when I knew for sure that "HHO" engines were a scam. It ALWAYS takes more energy to split the water than you get back when you recombine it.
robtice2 10 months ago
xeniavader, You're just lying. PERIOD. LYING. Not just stupid, not just ignorant, you're flat out lying. You have no buddy with a truck running on H2O. Unfortunately, you're also ignorant of the laws of conservation of energy, thermodynamics, etc. This stupid concept doesn't work, has been proven not to work repeatedly and no successful demonstration has ever been made of this technology. If it's so great, why isn't the car on sale somewhere?
robtice2 10 months ago
@robtice2 hmm, you might want to consider looking up hho generators..they convert water to hho (which is about 100x more explosive then gasoline, and feed it into that tiny engine. Its already been known about for over 100 years. the oil companys and alike dont want you to stop paying for gasoline.... get the drift why these things disappear..
Me102288 10 months ago
@robtice2 ignorent of laws that are so OLD technology has made them incorrect nowadays.. the law of over unity was broken when permanent magnet alternators hit the market. No it wasn't possible before that (unless you had 8 bloody alternators on your engine, then it would be weight killing it.. lol
my hho drycell feeds a 3.5hp lawmower engine, it takes 180 watts to generate... the permanent magnet alterntor its spinning is putting out 2kilowatt.... I dont see how it doesn't work :-\
Me102288 10 months ago
@robtice2 It doesn't take much amps to split water it takes voltage or signal, 60 hertz wont cut it try 50,000 hertz.
a stun gun at 1,000,000 volts will work too and it runs off a 9v battery!
astrialkil 9 months ago
a buddy of mine up-fitted his truck to run solely on H20. Works great, you'd never know your were driving with hydrogen. One tank of water is good for 100s of miles. I'm sure the oil companies are doing their best to block this type of technology. High voltage and low amps is what's needed to maximize electrolysis. The required electricity is FAR less than the kinetic energy derived from burned hydrogen. I know this goes again most simple chemical equations. hope this makes it big.
xeniavader 10 months ago
einstein said the same about splitting atoms, i think that has been prooved wrong on many occasions now
TheTwony 11 months ago
@TheTwony 30 million barrels of energy in 30 mililitres of water. that one?
Me102288 10 months ago
@TheTwony splitting atoms = energy... were just slitting hydrogen and oxygen and feeding it to an engine. DONT EVER split a hydrgen molecule or you and you town/city will have a very bad day. burning hydrogen is harmless, its only leftover is water :-\
Me102288 10 months ago
Another invention that poofed into thin air. On their web-site, there's a sob story about all the problems they're having bringing their product to market. Sounds like the oil cronies stuck it to them. The oil & gas cronies are in the process of finishing off the planet with their "gas fracking operations" and they don't want anyone throwing a wrench in the works. Especially the part where they throw radioactive & toxic chemical waste into the rivers and streams that supply our drinking water.
HemiHead66 11 months ago 16
@HemiHead66 hho after burned converts back to water on its own.. there are no other emisions, and electrolysis takes 316L stainless and some electricity, dont worry bud, why were trying to replace fossil fuels
Me102288 10 months ago
@HemiHead66 ~ Since the 60's, municipal water fluoridation has used hydrofluorosilicic acid, a waste byproduct from smoke stacks of aluminum and fertilizer plants, containing 23% sodium fluoride (rat poison), mercury, arsenic, lead, barium, cadmium, palonium 20 and other trace poisons. It's dental cavity prevention claim has never been proven. Water filters can't remove it, regardless of their claims. And, commercial pesticides are fluorides. So, our rivers perpetually poison our oceans.
stopdemockery 10 months ago
@stopdemockery Yeah, I know about the fluoride in the water. Whoever came up with the idea to use fluoride to fight cavities must have been a real winner. If you don't take care of your teeth, they're going to rot. And no amount of fluoride will prevent it. They're probably putting that shit in the water for other reasons. I've got my own well, so...
HemiHead66 10 months ago
@HemiHead66 no its not about taking care of your teeth , it about carbohydrate consumption and simple sugars in particular that does the damage.
astrialkil 9 months ago
@astrialkil Yes it is about taking care of your teeth. If you think that you can leave all of that crap on your teeth and not have them rot, you're crazy. As far as consumption, you'd have to be real bad with sugar & junk to have it do damage. If you brush your teeth & floss, most people won't have a problem. I eat a lot of sugar and never had much of a problem. All my problems came from not taking the time to get between those molars in the back. Didn't have dental floss when I was young.
HemiHead66 9 months ago
@HemiHead66 I only have 32 cavities and never brush my teeth so i don't know what you are talking about. and yes i have a sweet tooth.
astrialkil 9 months ago
@HemiHead66 So that they can create another market for "fresh drinking water" since it will soon be more difficult to find everywere...
sixstringmania 9 months ago
@HemiHead66 Umm... where do you get radioactive waste from oil??? You don't. The batteries to run electric cars however are considered toxic enough that they have to be stored in still water pools very similar to spent radioactive waste. Before you start complaining about oil and gas "cronies" start looking at what the real alternatives are first.
mnpaintballfreak 8 months ago
@mnpaintballfreak Actually oil contains naturally occuring radioactive materials, a method of finding deposits relies on this. However you make a good point.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck You are right that some oil deposits have radon and some radium isotopes however these are not inherently from oil, it is from the soil around the oil. It is really not much different than the radioactive isotopes that are active in the ground around your house. You do have to take precautions with it just like testing for radon in your basement in certain parts of the country.
mnpaintballfreak 8 months ago
@HemiHead66 THEY MAKE TRILLIONS A YEAR OFF THEIR GAS MONOPOLY - OF COURSE THEY WOULD NOT WANT ANY 'NEW' TECHNOLOGY GETTING IN THE WAY OF THEIR PROFITS!!!!
STAN MEYER HAD A CAR BACK IN THE 80'S THAT RAN OFF WATER .... HE DIED OF URANIUM POISONING!
I'M NOT SAYING ITS A CONSPIRACY... BUT IF ITS BEEN AROUND SINCE THEY 80'S....... SOMETHING IS QUITE FISHY TO SAY THE LEAST
THREEDAYOLDCOYOTE 8 months ago
This technology was invented by Denny Klein, from the US, and he even patented his technology! That was in 1996 lol.
peepeevagi 11 months ago
@peepeevagi Then in this Year his patent expires hehe and stanley meyers has expired for a while
Gades117 10 months ago
Even so, i'll be damned if japan tries to claim they invented the system.
peepeevagi 10 months ago
@peepeevagi brown's gas generator was what? 100 years ago? and proven by the government to work, and was PATENTED ? nope never heard of that one lol ;-)
Me102288 10 months ago
But that's not the same thing. Though i imagine it COULD be considered the same by the japanese.
They should keep their noses buried in rice where they belong xD
peepeevagi 10 months ago
@peepeevagi exactly the same thing. An electrolysis device that splits water into hydron and oxygen. only 2 ways I know... chemical (aluminium, potassium hydroxide and water) or electrolysis.. lol they're shit outta luck lol
Me102288 10 months ago
Still, i imagine the Japanese will attempt to take credit for it (They allready whitewash and rewrite their history O.o). And people across the world will believe it D:
peepeevagi 10 months ago
It is RIVA electric car..I came across a blow where Hundai did some testing with HHO model and found the mileage is decreased!!! and battery is exhausted...there are lot of people to fraud you selling ebooks...please beware..
avijit2k8 11 months ago
@avijit2k8 well, I guess they messed up.. because NASA is looking at it... copy paste this link in explorer..See why hydrogen CAN run any combustion engine the same distance on hyrogen with "gas" tank 3x SMALLER. And yes there will always be fraudulent ppl, doesn't mean it doesn't work. erc.ivv.nasa.gov/vision/earth/everydaylife/apr_zeolite_prt.htm
Me102288 10 months ago
@Me102288 your link is broken
astrialkil 9 months ago
Dihydrogen Monoxide is another term for water. The only place this type of technology is even feasible is on a submarine. Even there it isn’t energy efficient (requiring more energy to separate the molecules than it even will get from resulting elements) but oxygen is precious on a sub so it is worth it. BTW, the amount of water it would take to produce enough hydrogen to mimic a tank of gas would be equivalent to hauling around a hottub full of water.
lockdownrocks 11 months ago
@lockdownrocks 30 litre of water is the equivelent eregy of 30 MILLION gallons of gasoline. Albert Einstein
think again bud, Nasa is already proven you'd need 3x LESS ya dont believe it works? fine, pay for fuel for the rest of your life, well, of course, if theres any left by then :-\
Me102288 10 months ago
@Me102288 Enstein is refering to the energy release when the water is annihilated by anti-matter, not the burning of the hydrogen.
lockdownrocks 10 months ago
@lockdownrocks ah yes I'm reading up on Nasa's tests, apparently its only 3x better then gasoline, hmm, takes 3x less hydrogen to go the attain the same mileage as using gasoline in the seperate trails with 2 identicle engines. cool.
Me102288 10 months ago
Many people like those on here said light would travel in only a straight line and could not be bent. And no one even thought about the atom 1000 years ago, what history are you reading? As advanced as our "science" is no one understands the basic electron so how can anyone dismiss any new way of looking at the "science" behind HHO? Your skepticism is very typical of someone who believes what they are told and never attempts to reach out and try to disprove it. Open your mind robtice2 !
terrystech 11 months ago
No one ever claimed you couldn't bend light. Ancient people knew about refraction of light. And, until the concept of an atom was created, no one COULD think about splitting it and once it was thought of (about 1,000 years ago) they thought about splitting it. You need to study some history.
robtice2 11 months ago
It's not a matter of trust. This system was proven not to work about 100 years ago and it still doesn't work. Trust has nothing to do with it, its just plain mathematics and energy conservation. It simply takes more energy to separate the H2O than you get back when you recombine it. That's the whole ball game.
robtice2 11 months ago
Big oil is trying to stop you putting dihydrogen monoxide in your petrol tank. THEY KNOW IT RUNS YOU VEHICLE BETTER THAN GAS. but big oil and big government is SURPRESSING THIS FACT with BLACK HELICOPTERS!!!! send me dollars 300 to find out the truf. Don't be fooled sheeple!!!! I will probably be killed for telling you this so I deserve $300 ok!
augnkn93043 11 months ago
I find it amazing how so many people who think themselves to be so highly intelligent and educated can be so blind and so brainwashed. Those of you who have made brash comments on here about how this can't work have never, ever put your own sweat into trying to make a difference. This does work and for those who believe that the "math" proves it wont, think again. People thought for years you couldn't bend light but we found a way. We would never split the atom but we did or map DNA...
terrystech 11 months ago
@terrystech Amen, touche, I agree, finally I found the video, the holy grail of HHO, the place where people have brains!!!
aForkandaSpoon 11 months ago
DiHydrogenMonoxide? Are you guys this stupid? We played these stupid semantics games in Freshman chemistry and laughed our asses off at them, now you want us to take it seriously? No thanks. It was dumb then and it's dumb now.
robtice2 11 months ago
@robtice2 Is it so hard to trust, I could trust you or this, I choose this until proven undeniably wrong. Innocent until proven guilty. Right until proven wrong, that is my philosophy.
aForkandaSpoon 11 months ago
If it works, I'd love it.
robtice2 11 months ago
No, it's not. They refuse to allow a test of distance, for example, they refuse any kind of real test at all! The system will work short term, until the battery dies out. Scams of this type have been performed for over 100 years, creating cars that "run" off water, air, all kinds of crap. The simple fact is that anytime you claim to create more power than is available in your system, you're lying. The power required to separate the H &O exceeds the power you get back by recombining it.
robtice2 11 months ago
you can seperate the hydrogen with an old teacher type hydrogen oxygen gas generator . same container but seprate compartments for negative and possative . one makes hydrogen other makes oxygen . but it takes alot. i mean a looooooot of hydrogen and some small motors are incapable of generating the power needed. but if it can be done who gives a shit about efficency its water . it in the air . so why not elecrolize steam or just plain air. i say hydrogen takes filled with solar created hydrogen
theonethatgoofs 11 months ago
you can seperate the hydrogen with an old teacher type hydrogen oxygen gas generator . same container but seprate compartments for negative and possative . one makes hydrogen other makes oxygen . but it takes alot. i mean a looooooot of hydrogen and some small motors are incapable of generating the power needed. but if it can be done who gives a shit about efficency its water . it in the air . so why not elecrolize steam or just plain air.
theonethatgoofs 11 months ago
why such dumb people comments negatively on this arent they educated or just narrow minded why not keep those big heads with tiny brains on a guillotine and just watch and be happy if this will work theyll benefit on it and the whole world,maybe they are capitalist, the supplier of big oil companies, its not the Japan, China, Europe or american first discover it... its from south east asia who first invented it.
reylopez99 1 year ago
@reylopez99 The problem is that it doesn't work. It's been a scam for over 100 years. It never worked.
robtice2 1 year ago
@robtice2 Yet, here he is. . . Driving.
Vilemk0 11 months ago
@robtice2 you make laugh, if it works will it bothers you?
reylopez99 11 months ago
@robtice2 but if it work will it bothers you?
reylopez99 11 months ago
@reylopez99
You think its dumb to question this technology. I think its dumb to blindly accept it, without some understanding of what is going on here.
sparkygl0s 11 months ago
@sparkygl0s i dont question this im more than inspired of trying this kind of technology myself and studying it, im not a chem., engr. but theres nothing to loose if i try it, for me to know if really does work, its like saying salt is salty but you havent tasted it. i just wonder a hundred years ago i think also say man can never fly airplane doesnt work.
reylopez99 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sparkygl0s i dont question this im more than inspired of trying this kind of technology myself and studying it, im not a chem., engr. but theres nothing to loose if i try it, for me to know if really does work, its like saying salt is salty but you havent tasted it. i just wonder a hundred years ago i think they also say man can never fly airplane doesnt work.
reylopez99 11 months ago
Correction. My tentacled sandbox says the culprit is bad code by the password protocol rewriters for Youtube. But your video lacks sound. You need to remove it and remake it, with sound. All these commenting folks who seem to have sound on this video are probably cops watching you and pretending to be honest citizens. Boy are you in trouble. Whatcha got going, an encrypted video or something? Messages from Bin Laden to his rich Aunt asking for a raise in his allowance?
1emanres 1 year ago
and then a semi comes...
zomgwtfbbqbagel 1 year ago
This is fake. So is the comments box. THere is a virus in the video. The video knocks out your sound and Kaspersky eats the virus. I only wish Kaspersky would eat the person who posts this crap.
1emanres 1 year ago
@1emanres .... What?
johnathon124 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unlimited energy sources are out there!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Free yourself!
baccaratbargaineq 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Water Cars are dangerous to corporate profits and to every international economy.
If we curbed our reliance on fossil fuels, the global economy would come to a grinding halt and currencies would collapse, pushing the world into a new agrarian dark age.
Mining fossil fuels employs tens of millions in the oil exploration, drilling and oil spill cleanup industries.
Without oil, mass unemployment, starvation and global calamity will occur, therefore Water Car technology must be buried and forgotten.
CorporateRule 1 year ago
Comment removed
CorporateRule 1 year ago
Comment removed
CorporateRule 1 year ago
Comment removed
CorporateRule 1 year ago
Comment removed
CorporateRule 1 year ago
Comment removed
CorporateRule 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real but the coverup is strong, if you are interested in a REAL free energy machine then
just search for the LT MAGNET MOTOR in the youtube video search , it is probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
affluenceclm 1 year ago
Looks cool/ Where can i buy one?. How much?. Thanks
athletichunta 1 year ago
it's a G-Wiz people!! - search on youtube for G-Wiz . its powered by batteries. don't be fooled!!
augnkn93043 1 year ago
With the addition of batteries for ignition Oomph of the hydrolysis system, the next step in HHO vehicle technology is for the HHO system to hydrolyze the water vapor that naturally exists in the air. Even the driest air still has a minimum of ~1% by volume water in the form of water vapor. Why carry a tank of H2O around when the hydrolysis engine can suck in enough air to obtain it's water vapor? Batteries may be recharged once the HHO engine is in travel mode.
DancingSpiderman 1 year ago
:O, water powerd car, OMG
TheMaxinator3 1 year ago
why no sound?
rawux1228 1 year ago
this guy is not to be trusted. he's trying to disguise the fact that HHO is the same has H20. Thats right folks. just put water into your gas tank to achieve the same effect.
augnkn93043 1 year ago
@augnkn93043 HHO is NOT the same as H2O.
HHO is disassociated hydrogen and oxygen molecules in gaseous form.
H2O is liquid water.
NOT the same thing.
DancingSpiderman 1 year ago
@DancingSpiderman no; it's not water it's Dihydrogen Monoxide; that's what I run my car on. Dihydrogen Monoxide is an easily obtained household chemical and it's very cheap; Send me $100 to get my ebook called 200 uses for Dihydrogen Monoxide and $599 for my ebook called How to run your car on Dihydrogen Monoxide. Don't be taken in by big oil. Discover the secrets of Dihydrogen Monoxide today.
augnkn93043 1 year ago
@augnkn93043 Very well then. The day for Dihydrogen Monoxide has come. If I had $100 dallah and if i had a vehicle I'd send for your book e.
DancingSpiderman 1 year ago
@DancingSpiderman Bullshit. HHO is by definition, H2O. It's just a different way of writing it in order to fool chemical idiots. It's like writing ClNa instead of NaCl. Either the people never had basic chemistry or they have forgotten it. PEOPLE, YOU"RE IDIOTS to think HHO isn't H2O. You don't get to make up new rules for how to write chemistry, you know.
robtice2 11 months ago
That car looks like its been taken roughly up the ass by a much larger car and its now looking for a show to sit under and cry....
myjizzureye 1 year ago
where does the water go? if its renewable then this might be makin it go away completely right?
bubbah12345 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For every hundred units of energy released when you burn hydrogen (with oxygen to produce water) it takes a hundred units of energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. Allowing for inefficiencies you'll get a lot less energy out than you have to put in. Thus FAIL!!!
No denying you can burn hydrogen in an engine but it is not efficient at all.
Element095 1 year ago
what we really need is a car that runs on piss and shit .
johnathon124 1 year ago 22
@johnathon124 LOOOOL
that's true
Flavor88 1 year ago
@johnathon124 that engine exists. It is called the Pantone engine.
DancingSpiderman 1 year ago
@johnathon124 Piss would probably work.
Vilemk0 11 months ago
@johnathon124 No, we need a car that runs on idiots. Apparently there are plenty of them and they are excess to the general population. And, they apparently have lots of energy to expend.
robtice2 11 months ago
@johnathon124 Actually, that sounds doable... Yup, I checked. There are a few people working on making bio-ethanol from sewage. Neato.
93tomb 11 months ago
@johnathon124 shit's already been done :-) just wondering it piss would work if ya drank some high octane alcohol.. lol
Me102288 10 months ago
@johnathon124 If cars started running on piss & shit, the oil cronies would look to shove a cork up everyone's ass.
HemiHead66 10 months ago 31
@HemiHead66 No actually they would rip out your intestines and ban urine and poo as "
toxic substances like they are trying to do with carbon dioxide!
astrialkil 9 months ago
@HemiHead66
Technically that would only stop the shit. The Jew bankers that make all the money off oil through futures trading would cut your gentile balls off and tie your dick in a knot. I have mine tied in a nice bow right now with gas hitting 4 bucks a gallon!
I am surprised we have not declared war on wall street and their crooked lap dogs in Washington DC. It would be over in a day.
QuarkToo 9 months ago
@HemiHead66 Factually it would take two corks for women, and one cork plus a rubber band for men - but you're quite right in principle.
LoveVernors 7 months ago
@HemiHead66 @HemiHead66 The world would have NEVER gotten this far in technology or advancement without fuel oil jackass! Go back to your $12/hr job will ya?
3TruthSeeker33 6 months ago
@3TruthSeeker33 Lick my balls, shit for brains, oil was obsolete decades ago. And your dumb-ass don't even know where most of out technology came from.
HemiHead66 6 months ago
@3TruthSeeker33 It figures, another Obama birther with his brain filled with Drill Baby Drill propaganda.. What happened to those lower gas prices if we were only allowed to drill more? Even with Obama's moratorium, oil production in the U.S. is at an 8 year high, and that's with 6 million people unemployed. Where's the lower gas prices? You Pubtart idiots will buy anything.
HemiHead66 6 months ago
@3TruthSeeker33 Lol you gotta be kidding :) The world far in advancement and technology? NO...we are very far behind my friend. The fact that the world still runs on oil is a very solid proof of that.
Cas32dobbelt0 4 months ago
@HemiHead66 earthquake sinks em all... tsunami, haarp.
RobMonty248 4 months ago
@HemiHead66 they already have to several inventors that made thier discoveries public. I say we do this HHO thing anyways and let the OIL companies suffer, fuck those goofs
MrROTD 3 weeks ago
I saw in another video w/audio that this thing gets about 80k/liter that equates to roughly 188.86mi/gal
youngn420 1 year ago
I'm quite sure I can get a video that shows 10,000 miles per gallon. Why bother faking less? HHO is H2O is water, and this doesn't work. Never has, never will. The energy required to separate the hydrogen from the water exceeds the energy gained by recombining it. You have to be really naive and ignorant of the most elemental science to believe otherwise.
robtice2 1 year ago
I merely posted a quoted claim and never stated whether it was or not true. HHO and H2O are not exactly the same.
H2O is a one single oxygen atom bonded with two hydrogen atom.HHO is two hydrogen gases with one oxygen gas that are mixed and not bonded. HHO is most commonly used in a torch for welding water is not. I am aware of the engery needed to create HHO and I dont believe that this vehicle does what it claims. However I do believe you dont have a full understanding of basic chemistry.
youngn420 1 year ago
Chemical notation is not a matter of opinion and I do indeed have a basic understanding of chemistry. HHO and H2O are essentially identical. HHO cannot be "...two hydrogen atoms with one oxygen gas..." I suggest you check out basic standard chemical notation before you post on this subject again. Mixtures have a notational process, by the way and it's not uninterrupted elemental listing.
robtice2 1 year ago
@youngn420 - wrong!
H2O is not a single atom. It is a molecule comprised of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom.
HHO is not as you claim. Electrolysis of two water molecules produces two molecules of hydrogen (H2) and one molecule of oxygen (O2). Every chemist will tell you that.
LiamXaoh 1 year ago
@LiamXaoh Learn to read buddy where in my comment did i say H2O is a single atom? Due to the limited character count field I did kind of botch up the point I was trying to make about what HHO is. HHO is not water nor is it a different way of stating H2O. AGAIN LEARN TO READ "H2O is a one single oxygen atom bonded with two hydrogen atom" I ran out of space and neglected to pluralize the word atom but I guess you lack the common sense to figure that out.
youngn420 1 year ago
@youngn420 - get over it. There is no such thing as HHO.
LiamXaoh 1 year ago
@youngn420 This is far beyond chemistry. This is wave field theory. Something about the combination of magnetic waves is causing a hydrogen atom to shift in the molecule... it is still wet, but it burns. A two contact electrolosis does not create the same effect. The energy origin may not be chemical, but it may be there nonetheless.
Many said the same thing about splitting the atom... Until it had a military use =P
ParrhesiaJoe 1 year ago
@robtice2 - you got it right there. The folks that promote this HHO bullshit don't want to hear about science and facts.
LiamXaoh 1 year ago
At Chernobyl, about 0.05% of the reactor core material was released. The rest remains. The radiation level reached 40 times the lethal level almost instantly, causing death in 2 days to weeks for those exposed at that level. Don't forget there was radiation deaths in the Manhattan Project too. Italy has phased out nuke plants and Germany is to, based on illness rates and hazard analysis. And they use the US style nukes. Nuke is the most expensive power available. double any other.
robtice2 2 years ago
Just so you know, a full reactor melt down is possible in US style reactor because the emergency water cooling systems have NEVER been tested and an earthquake can destroy the pumps, pipes and/or power to the pumps. Full melt down yields the China Syndrome, meaning the molten core sinks down through the base (nothing can stop it) and into the soil and water table below it. When it hits the water table. there is a Chernobyl style reaction. It would be worse than Chernobyl, much worse.
robtice2 2 years ago
In case someone never attended school, "HHO" is EXACTLY the same as H2O and means common water. This thing is essentially a fake. Its a hydrogen car, nothing new, with the eternal problem of fuel. The energy required to separate the hydrogen from the water exceeds the energy gained by burning it back to water. There is simply no possible way to gain energy from this system. People been trying it since the discovering water splits into hydrogen and water. It's NEVER worked & doesn't now.
robtice2 2 years ago
L@@K, a coffin on wheels. LOLOLOLOLOL
kriegmeister3000 2 years ago
!!!
Kywdo 2 years ago
isn't that car a g-wiz? if it is that quiet strange as a g-wiz is an electric car so theirs no gas engine for the hydrogen...
Core2duoMac 2 years ago
The problem is that EVERY system to separate the hydrogen from the oxygen requires more energy than you get back from recombining it. This simply doesn't work. The math is simple.
robtice2 2 years ago 2
There is more energy in heaven and earth than dreamed of in the mind of a small-minded person
saturnx311 2 years ago
@robtice2 The EROEI (energy returned on energy invested) isn't the only thing to take in account. You also have to think of energy portability and energy density of the energy carrier. Since hydrogen is far superior to batteries it could be worth the energy loss.
ingeborgsjon 1 year ago
@ingeborgsjon Actually, it is the only thing you need to take into account. If energy expended exceeds energy output, in a closed system (a car) the deficit means it WON'T WORK. I fail to see that Hydrogen is superior to batteries. The problem is getting the hydrogen using less energy than you get from recombining the hydrogen with something else. When the hydrogen is acquired from an outside source, (Iceland by geothermal) its a winner in terms of cost per unit traveled.
robtice2 1 year ago
@robtice2 and yet this one works.....
opiumrx 11 months ago
@robtice2 dude, u being flat earth about it. ie: "something doesn't agree with the theory i've got in my head that says how it should be, therefore it can't be true"
maybe u should see with ur eyes b4 deciding
lancsFrogger 10 months ago
@robtice2 Your full of crap...... Stop lying and get a little education before you spout that horse crap.... Stanley Meyer easily got more and so does this one..
Gades117 10 months ago
My dad is the only one on earth that knows secretes about the smartplug that can run virtually any fuel but it's not his invention and he doesn't own the patent. There are more powerful technologies possible than this dinky car. They want you to believe you have to have tiny lightweight vehicles to make alternative work. Since the dawn of Tesla we have been ripped of free energy. Energy is ample on Earth and easily harness with the right technology, the technology they suppress.
x11115 2 years ago
@x11115 if its no his invention HOW can he be the "only one on earth"?
Mosley2 2 years ago
sure, your father knows real bigg secrets .... and now you are just blubbering your lips about that secret.
The two of you are unbeatable maybe even , eh?
If only we would know what your father knows ... owell, nevermind that . i think your full of shit , come to think of it ^^
partyshock 2 years ago
There is not such thing as free energy, according to thermodymics laws, energy is only tranformed from one form into another while loosing energy in the process.
MrKompere 2 years ago
that car look s so funny i want one
aaronlikesalex 2 years ago
this is a filipino inventor idea.
gikaintapan 2 years ago
I kind of know the some of the idea, on how it works. Do you know where to get the full understanding on how it works on plan water?
rennnsymbol 2 years ago
no it's not the guy that made the first water care is named Stan Myers. You can google it here on Youtube and he was killed over it. The Japs stole this technology. My father made the first plane fly without magnetos it's on youtube as well called smartplugs. my dad is only mentioned once by first name "Chuck". It was also a Nasa and military project. My dad quite because he was cheated and he was offered a job with the Skycar also here on youtube but he said it wouldn't work.
x11115 2 years ago
1:38 almost crash haha
RescGT777 2 years ago
Hey, don't rub it in, haha.
Also, that makes a lot more sense. I'm from the US. Nothing really makes sense here, lol.
Jrien 2 years ago
Huh, that's pretty interesting. But I have to say- Tesla motors is NOT going to be that big a seller. The cheapest car they sell is $49,900. I don't see too many people buying from them. Zenn shows considerably more promise, with their only apparent flaw being that they're fairly new (only 1 model year), and they don't have very many dealers yet. GM and Ford don't have a lot of hope of surviving that long. I've never heard of Magna before, but their site isn't loading well so I can't learn more.
Jrien 2 years ago
The point is Big Oil is not crushing these electric cars. We have real practical cars on the road or coming into production soon. Not just test programs like the EV1.
bcreason 2 years ago 2
You know they always say soon.
drekecdrekecadrekecu 2 years ago
In this case they have specific dates and prototypes undergoing testing.
Toyota, Ford, GM & others have announced specific models and release dates. The first ones are coming out in 2010.
bcreason 2 years ago
CNET has a news article claiming an equivalent of 230 mpg for the Volt. If you live in an area with cheap electricity (5 cents / KwH) it will cost you about 40 cents to charge the battery overnight. Volt's predicted to cost $40K minus $7.5K US Gov incentive. (CNET's numbers not mine) Expect it on dealers lots late 2010.
In my area this would be close to zero emissions as we're mostly Hydro & Nuclear.
bcreason 2 years ago
Yeah, I just heard about that today. It sounds pretty good actually (Though $32500 is still a little pricey, not horrible, especially considering the cost of running it, but it is a considerable initial investment).
Also, where do you live anyway? Zero emissions would be nice.
Jrien 2 years ago