Couldn't they have gotten some prettier bitches on that album cover? The only one worth a second thought is the most light-skinned in the middle (the one for Luke). The dark skinned one in the middle (posing for Mr. Mixx) looks like a fucking man!
@Shandra360 Nothing to do with the skin, they just look ugly as hell from the back. The more light-skinned stands out because she has a nice ass unlike the rest. The one in front of Marquis looks nice too with that long hair but the other two are hella ugly looking at the rear shot.
@fleshnbone187 excuse you. you can't even see the women's faces and you all ready calling them ugly??? they all have awesome bodies...shame on you... clearly you are color struck..
@cdavilmar Believe me I'm not. I do have more of a thing for light skinned girls more than dark but I don't base it on their color, it's just what I have a natural attraction for. With that said, The darker skinned ones ain't no match for the girl standing in front of Luke (the light skinned one) As for their faces, from the back the one in front of Mr. Mixx with the shorter hair doesn't look really all that promising. Just my opinion
@fleshnbone187 Ok. I take you for your word, but at first glance your comment looked like a premature judgment based on skin color. To me they all look like they have awesome bodies, but then again I am a heterosexual girl. Maybe guys have a 6th sense about these things. However, if I had to guess who the prettiest girl was, I would vote the first one. She has the most womanly body and her hair is awesome.
now we know there are at least 7 big hairy women in the world, maybe more cuz that dislike bar is like wooly willy's wooly willy they just cant get enuff
Get over yourselves. This is funny, as is alot of 2LC's material. Some of you pansies think it can't be good rap unless you have some talentless punk talking about slinging crack and shooting people. I remember when 2 pac was just a dancer in the background of Digital Underground videos. He was sooo hardcore. Do the Humpty Hump.
Get over yourselves. This is funny as is alot of 2LC's material. Some of you pansies think it can't be good rap unless you have some talentless punk talking about slinging crack and shooting people. I rembember when 2 pac was just a dancer in the background of Digital Underground videos. He was sooo hardcore.
The Supreme Court case doesn't say it's fair use, per se, as some people seem to be suggesting. They just reverse the Circuit Court and remand so the defendant (2 Live Crew) can attempt to prove the affirmative defense of fair use, including showing that their use would not harm the market for rap derivative works of the original song
@majick59 There is nobody else interested in this garbage. It goes to prove it does not have any effect on the market. The lawsuit is what made it known.
Remember, when testing for fair use, and using criteria #1 about "purpose and character of use," the more transformative the use, the less important the other three factors.
And yes, if your professor doesn't agree it's parody, and she sits on the Federal Appeals Court, she's getting her ass reversed.
We just discussed this today in my class. It being a parody is your own opinion. Our professor is a lawyer and said she doesn't believe its fits a parody b/c it is not referencing or making an opinion about the original in her opinion. But a lot of our class said that it is b/c its referencing/making fun of writing lovey songs about pretty women and this version makes fun of that by talking about other types of women.
actually, the fact that it's a parody is the opinion of the supreme court of the united states. read the opinion. Souter refers to the song as a parody (not satire) dozens of times. so, unless your professor is Sandra Day O'Connor, i really don't care what she thinks.
Actually the Supreme Court just said that the 6th Circuit was incorrect in state a presumption that parody was not fair use. It was remanded for a new decision without the presumption applied by the 6th Circuit. On remand, the parties settled and 2 Live Crew agreed to license the music for an undisclosed amount of consideration.
@csdude35 this is not fair use at all. They were denied a license for philosophical differences to make a derivative work but they did it anyways and are still being sued.
@Vipmaxp not sure what you are talking about, i am talking about the supreme court case, who declared that the song was fair use under various copyright laws
@csdude35 If by fair use you mean ripping off musicians because they have no talent to write music themselves then yes, they should have forced them to give money to the real artists.
@csdude35 If by fair use you mean ripping off musicians because they have no talent to write music themselves then yes, they should have forced them to give money to the real artists.
2 Live Crew <3 :D Peace from Germany
DerNegermeister 6 months ago
Motherfuckers
lolomgmetobavi 7 months ago
@lolomgmetobavi Motherfucker !!!!!!!!!!!!
DerNegermeister 6 months ago
was this song ever on the uncensored version?
RobertC19850209 8 months ago
@RobertC19850209 No, it was only on the clean version (As Clean As They Wanna Be)
Skorpio420 3 months ago
nope had to buy the other virsion just to get his song
spk197231 3 weeks ago
Laaaaaaaaammmmmmeeeeeeeeeee!!!!
Corleone2239 11 months ago 3
Wow, I guess I'm not the first law student to come here after reading about this case.
Kanuskiz 11 months ago 2
Couldn't they have gotten some prettier bitches on that album cover? The only one worth a second thought is the most light-skinned in the middle (the one for Luke). The dark skinned one in the middle (posing for Mr. Mixx) looks like a fucking man!
fleshnbone187 11 months ago
@fleshnbone187 how u know what they look like is u mad because they dark skinned.
Shandra360 9 months ago
@Shandra360 Nothing to do with the skin, they just look ugly as hell from the back. The more light-skinned stands out because she has a nice ass unlike the rest. The one in front of Marquis looks nice too with that long hair but the other two are hella ugly looking at the rear shot.
fleshnbone187 9 months ago
@Shandra360
can we have that in English plz ?
onefatdick 6 months ago
@fleshnbone187 excuse you. you can't even see the women's faces and you all ready calling them ugly??? they all have awesome bodies...shame on you... clearly you are color struck..
cdavilmar 3 months ago
@cdavilmar Believe me I'm not. I do have more of a thing for light skinned girls more than dark but I don't base it on their color, it's just what I have a natural attraction for. With that said, The darker skinned ones ain't no match for the girl standing in front of Luke (the light skinned one) As for their faces, from the back the one in front of Mr. Mixx with the shorter hair doesn't look really all that promising. Just my opinion
fleshnbone187 3 months ago
@fleshnbone187 Ok. I take you for your word, but at first glance your comment looked like a premature judgment based on skin color. To me they all look like they have awesome bodies, but then again I am a heterosexual girl. Maybe guys have a 6th sense about these things. However, if I had to guess who the prettiest girl was, I would vote the first one. She has the most womanly body and her hair is awesome.
cdavilmar 3 months ago
now we know there are at least 7 big hairy women in the world, maybe more cuz that dislike bar is like wooly willy's wooly willy they just cant get enuff
bloodlustmassacre 11 months ago
Get over yourselves. This is funny, as is alot of 2LC's material. Some of you pansies think it can't be good rap unless you have some talentless punk talking about slinging crack and shooting people. I remember when 2 pac was just a dancer in the background of Digital Underground videos. He was sooo hardcore. Do the Humpty Hump.
ShaggyShagz13 1 year ago
Get over yourselves. This is funny as is alot of 2LC's material. Some of you pansies think it can't be good rap unless you have some talentless punk talking about slinging crack and shooting people. I rembember when 2 pac was just a dancer in the background of Digital Underground videos. He was sooo hardcore.
ShaggyShagz13 1 year ago
It's the entirety of the work, not the specificities that make it a parody instead of satire. Fair use applies here.
beatle1234 1 year ago
man these guys sampled every song made lol but cool song though
Regset 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the great bbw dating service naneedj.info
arilgathompson 1 year ago
The case settled out on remand, also it was found to be parody in so far as it commented on the triteness of the original.
cobbeec 1 year ago
assholes u need a sense of humor..This is a funny song
stabile1018 1 year ago
@stabile1018 i agree fella ppl need to loosen up and get a sense of humour ,its just music for ffs
Spoookyii 1 year ago
Had to watch to do my law paper...these kinds of work makes you appreciate the original song more.
shiranmack 1 year ago
Pitiful garbage
vsua10 1 year ago
This is not a parody. It does not pass comment on the original.
hatfinch 1 year ago
The Supreme Court case doesn't say it's fair use, per se, as some people seem to be suggesting. They just reverse the Circuit Court and remand so the defendant (2 Live Crew) can attempt to prove the affirmative defense of fair use, including showing that their use would not harm the market for rap derivative works of the original song
doomhandle 1 year ago 2
I'm having to listen to this horrific song for a paper for my law class i attend Yale
robertlamb178 1 year ago
@robertlamb178 I am also above this nonmusic garbage and I don't attend Yale
vsua10 1 year ago
Cause you look like cousin It :D:D:D:D:D:D:D
somehow888 1 year ago
hairy woman stay away from me (you're for my dad!)
MeYouView 1 year ago
Plus, tittyj2020, the version of Doo Wah diddy on the clean version is much much better than the nasty version.
Wrapscallionn 1 year ago
@Wrapscallionn Are you talking about the one I just posted as a response to this video?
Skorpio420 1 year ago
Who the fuck bought the clean version?
tittyj2020 1 year ago 16
@tittyj2020 I found it at a pawn shop. And it isn't exactly clean. "Break It On Down", "City of Boom", and "Mega Mix III" all have cussing on them.
Skorpio420 1 year ago
@Skorpio420 its the 2 Live Crew....Pioneersssssssssss!!!!
HWMeatcutter 11 months ago
@tittyj2020 This particular song wasn't on the "Nasty As They Wanna Be" album. It was only released on the clean version.
Aw0L74 1 year ago
haha this is soo funny!!!! love it <3
DasFlorian 1 year ago
2 Live was cool as hell.....plus , they tested the free speech waters for us.
Wrapscallionn 1 year ago
this iz kool
mralami 1 year ago
Big hairy woman all that hair it ain't legit
Cause you look like `Cousin It'
Lmao!
chilloeh 1 year ago
still cracks me up how this song caused "the" parody case for IP classes, lol this song suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuucks
astocsm 1 year ago
I love the fact that most of the comments on this video are from IP students! haha
majick59 1 year ago
@majick59 There is nobody else interested in this garbage. It goes to prove it does not have any effect on the market. The lawsuit is what made it known.
vsua10 1 year ago
Lmao, I am writing a paper on this for a law class.
Default2009 1 year ago
this shouldn't be allowed even by fair use simply because it's so crappy.
KennethKaniffFromCT 1 year ago
wow dont like it... listening to it only because of the case.... i think the states made a mistake.....
slavena10 1 year ago
yea....only prety women..........from mexicali.b.c
timsa2 1 year ago
+1 for listening after reading the case.
Remember, when testing for fair use, and using criteria #1 about "purpose and character of use," the more transformative the use, the less important the other three factors.
And yes, if your professor doesn't agree it's parody, and she sits on the Federal Appeals Court, she's getting her ass reversed.
briang467 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
briang467 2 years ago
dont like it
Doakmiseter 2 years ago
remember law students, this is a parody, not a satire, and also is fair use :D
csdude35 2 years ago 83
We just discussed this today in my class. It being a parody is your own opinion. Our professor is a lawyer and said she doesn't believe its fits a parody b/c it is not referencing or making an opinion about the original in her opinion. But a lot of our class said that it is b/c its referencing/making fun of writing lovey songs about pretty women and this version makes fun of that by talking about other types of women.
MegKaiser88 2 years ago
actually, the fact that it's a parody is the opinion of the supreme court of the united states. read the opinion. Souter refers to the song as a parody (not satire) dozens of times. so, unless your professor is Sandra Day O'Connor, i really don't care what she thinks.
csdude35 2 years ago 24
@csdude35
Actually the Supreme Court just said that the 6th Circuit was incorrect in state a presumption that parody was not fair use. It was remanded for a new decision without the presumption applied by the 6th Circuit. On remand, the parties settled and 2 Live Crew agreed to license the music for an undisclosed amount of consideration.
someaznpunk 1 year ago
@csdude35 this is not fair use at all. They were denied a license for philosophical differences to make a derivative work but they did it anyways and are still being sued.
Vipmaxp 1 year ago
@Vipmaxp not sure what you are talking about, i am talking about the supreme court case, who declared that the song was fair use under various copyright laws
csdude35 1 year ago
@csdude35 Hahhahaha! I am reading about this case for my IP class right now!
rajalcool 1 year ago
@csdude35 If by fair use you mean ripping off musicians because they have no talent to write music themselves then yes, they should have forced them to give money to the real artists.
therealsteamingpile 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@csdude35 If by fair use you mean ripping off musicians because they have no talent to write music themselves then yes, they should have forced them to give money to the real artists.
therealsteamingpile 1 month ago
mark another one up that is listening after reading the copyright case...
johngambill 2 years ago 3
haha i am definitely watching this after reading the case... i don't think i can ever listen to the original song in the same way again....
poisonivy1809 2 years ago
I wonder how many of the views are people looking up this song after reading the copyright case?
NeoAngelus 2 years ago 4
Guilty!!!
jjpanthers 2 years ago
*raises hand*
illi10nis27 1 year ago
@NeoAngelus LOL. Count me in...
PrincessEmoke 1 year ago
isnt this the one that got them in shyt?
dnaslinky369 2 years ago
Woo! Legal precedent yay!
callanr 2 years ago
lol, my i.p. final is tomorrow bayyybaaayyy
astocsm 2 years ago
weird- mine too
CedricLogan 2 years ago
Old Times!
Hunibersal 2 years ago
Good Times!
Skorpio420 2 years ago 2